But interesting thing about Science is when you have time, matter and space, they all need each other. Without one or the other, life wouldn't be possible. Just as how there's a reason why the sun comes up and why it goes down. Just as the reason why there's a moon and how it effects the tides of the ocean. Yes, these are very elementary, simple, arguments...but does it have to be complicated? God made it plain to us but that doesn't mean we should stop learning about him in other ways. In other words, science buffs or scientists should not disregarding the idea of God but should be believing him and using him as the question "HOW DID HE MAKE THIS CREATION AND FOR WHAT PURPOSE?"

One more thing, about people wanting to have scientific evidence. You know, it's funny how they argue about science bc what I would like to know is what does that have to do with anything with the WORD OF GOD? I mean, God's word wasn't simply to share us with scientific facts, history, anthropology, or even art. However, he can be. The bible shows him as a Moralist, where he gives us the ethic code. So, when you do have to deal with someone like that, it just doesn't make any sense for them to argue with science when you are debating about Religion because it doesn't even matter who's arguement stands.

Just the same as the Disciples, who ran away from Jesus 3 days ago but all of a sudden 3 days later they were willing enough to pack and go around the world to spread the word, even willing to risk their lives, which they did. Hmm...that would be lunacy but what were they gaining? Also, here's another interesting thing about Jesus. He is the ONLY person out through history that his following crowd grew after he died. Think about it...what other person that died after and had their word to spread? All of the other leaders in the world were ALIVE and in the present time when they were sharing their word, whether politics, religion, etc.

Yeah, I'm sure people will say he was born on the 25th of December, just as Jesus. But the truth is NO ONE KNOWS WHAT DAY JESUS WAS REALLY BORN, LOL? I don't even know why that's even an issue. That just makes me think about Horus, MIthra, Krishna, being made up. Also, look up the Roman empire with Augustus Ceasar, Pontius Pilate and other contemporaries who saw Jesus. Any history buff should know that you need WITNESSES to say someone existed. Now, you can argue about details but it shouldn't negate that they didn't exist. I don't think the Roman empire would just crucify somebody and then all of a sudden worship him...unless something miraculous happened.

Also, some people will say most of these laws came from the book of the dead. I'm sure that's a very vaild argument to use but I wonder, how did the Egyptians apply their law comparing to God applying to his. James 2:10 "For whoever stumbles one law, breaks all of it." lol, it's going to be hard to believe if the Egyptians followed that rule when out through history they punished each person differently. Even though, The Book of the Dead has been written NUMEROUS OF TIMES. You can look it up. Wikipedia is the quickest way. You will even find about Horus, who's made up.

I read some of your comments on your arguments against someone who spoke about conscience. Here's a few pointers for you, for the future. First off, make sure the message isn't strictly about "Believe this or perish" but the message is more as "Believe in me so I can save you from perishing." As for the conscience argument...think of it this way. Why didn't God give the commandments to Adam and Eve but to Moses, instead? I mean, Adam and Eve broke the law too. Are we assuming that between the time from them to Moses that no one knew how to live their lives? Of course they knew! Look at it as Moses gave the laws not because they are rules but to REMIND US AND SHOW how sinful we are to mankind.

After reading some of your comments it seems that you are confused about the 'theory'. I recommend you look up the definition as there is a HUGE difference (in fact they have completely separate meanings) between a 'theory' & a 'scientific theory'. To claim that evolution is JUST a 'theory' does not do much for your credibility.

Are you really so stupid that you think gravity is a law! HAHAHAH