jfk's assasintation is sooooo sad =[.

RE claims the film technology wouldn't allow this in '63 (late '63 at that), I know I've seen older movies with effects like these. Television series Bewithced was in '64 and there were lots of special effects like these and more.

Excellent, you present a strong argument.

I work in the film industry and right away you lost me. An optical printer, especially one that would be available in 1963 could never achieve the complicated moving matte that would be necessary to pull this off. Especially if the 2 plates that were being composited came from the Zapruder film. There would be all sorts of noticeable artifacts where the 2 plates came together. This what I thought. So I spoke with an older co-worker at the post production facility I work in. All he does is make opticals and has been doing it since the 70's. So he knows the older optical printers very well. He watched your video and said it would not be possible to perform a complicated composite like you explain on an optical printer from 1963. Nice try though.

There's only one minor thing that bothers me though I completely agree and 100% convinced that there was a conspiracy: why didn't the perps keep it simple? Why didn't they just ambush the President like Ruby did with Oswald? One bullet to the head from behind like Lincoln? Other than that I agree to the whole conspiracy. I posted the question on one channel and I haven't gotten a response yet.

People who follow the Warren Comission´s conclusions are sheep. The Comission was ADMITTEDLY (and I am stressing this fact!)formed to establish a pre conceived conclusion, which means that they were the ones following a very narrow theoretical path. People like bleeaahh have done a much better job of trying to find the truth than the comission ever did.

nstead of the typical process of looking at all the possibilities and deciding which of them best makes sense, conspiracists generally follow a line of reasoning which first demands that the conspiracy exist. They then follow whatever tortured path of conjecture is necessary to arrive at that conclusion.

.. I dont think, however, that the young black couple are able to give any testimony about this case because they are most likely dead or disappeared now.. but there is plenty of indicies AND evidence pointing to a conspiracy, probably NOT involving Oswald as I firmly believe that he was in fact trying to prevent the crime from happening. Or that he believed it himself- this made him eligible as the patsy.

Interesting analysis. I would also REALLY like to see the "Babooshka Lady" and Gordon Arnold films as well as listen to what the young black couple, witnessed by Marilyn Sitzman, sitting behind the retaining wall, close to the picket fence at the time of the head shot(s), have to say about what they saw..

He falls forward, because Connely got shot in the back.

I read that at school. o-o