british imperialists..... love how these pro britains and royalists still love everything from her.... her voice, her 'attitude' (neo-liberal-capitalist) , her turds? what else?
Your first idea of companies who do not try and create jobs should be taxed is a good idea but your second is just stupid that is not how a successful economy works.
Also people should be able to feed their families but they will always be the less fortunate but people should be able to earn as much as possible because that is what should inspire people to be successful in life and if you limit what people earrn that is stepping in to marxism.
if only we could have a leader now with the balls she did i too hate TUC if you strike in a recesion you should loose your job the strikers should be lucky to have a job in the economy we have now and how stupid do you have to be to strike and not get paid when you have a family who need to be fed
@SupErFeRrit22 That's ridiculous, the point was they could barely feed their family when they were being paid! More to the point, why should some of Britain's hardest workers face the indignity of not being able to feed their families when the rich are given a free reign to get richer and control more and more of total wealth? In a recession, the rich who do not create jobs should be taxed and companies which take massive profits should be made to support their workers as living costs increase.
@thatcher88 Your first idea of companies who do not try and create jobs should be taxed is a good idea but your second is just stupid that is not how a successful economy works.
Also people should be able to feed their families but they will always be the less fortunate but people should be able to earn as much as possible because that is what should inspire people to be successful in life and if you limit what people earrn that is stepping in to marxism.
There is nothing wrong with suggesting that a company should distribute more of its profits and improve worker's rights and create more jobs. It is all very well to have inspiration, but as you admitted yourself, the 'less fortunate' will always exist in a neo-liberal society, and therefore, only a limited number can improve their lives through 'inspiration'. I think these people would prefer less lofty notions such as enough food for their kids or the ability to heat their homes...
@thatcher88 i disagree because if you give the workers everything they want the economy would fall in to colapse and everyone would be poor which is unfortunate i do not like it as much as you do but that is the way the world works i know i am sounding like a unheartful fuck but it is
I disagree with the assumption you make that ensuring hard working workers are able to feed their kids and heat their homes is the equivalent to giving workers 'everything they want'. It's an odd thing to say, because you imply workers want an endless supply of benefits. However, most workers want to be safe at work and be paid enough to have a reasonable standard of living. If our wonderful neo-liberal economy cannot even provide this to a great bulk of workers, then perhaps we must change.
@thatcher88 i did not mean it like that and have a look at the BA staff when they went on strike and the post office both have nothing to moan about BA staff had various perks which many would wish to have and the health and saftey at work act provides safe working conditions if you are familier with it.
Your hardly in a position to comment on whether the BA or post office staff have nothing to complain about. However, both companies, particularly BA, are in a position to cut the exorbitant salaries and re-direct some of the profit to their hardest working, yet lowest paid workers. Company directors need to start valuing these front line workers who keep these companies in existence. You cannot deny that a percentage of these workers are lowly paid, and struggling to pay for the basics.
@thatcher88 no but you have to admit they is a lot more people who would love to have the jobs that they went on strike for also this is going to go on forever so lets change the topic what are your thoughts on the london riots
There has to be a point that can't be crossed however in terms of workplace safety and salaries. Generally, it doesn't take long for these people to want the same things as the previous workers when they find their salaries won't cover living costs. As for the London riots, they are really difficult to understand, except that the acts are thuggish criminality. These people are an underclass who are excluded from society who recognize they are the victims of wealth inequality.
@thatcher88 that may be true for a minority of the rioters but for the most part they are out to loot and cause trouble just because they are criminals and i think the way we stop further riots in the future is to set an example and make the rioters arrested to pay for the damages out of their salaries at a monthly or weekly rate and to make them clear up the damage along with an apology to every buisness damaged this would make them respect authority and the community.
@SupErFeRrit22 I don't disagree that they are out to loot and cause trouble or that they are criminals. But I feel there is a connection between their criminality, looting and rioting and the fact many of these people, unlike those from the middle class, are quite disillusioned from the rest of society and also unable to participate in the economy as we do. I agree with your idea, but I think we must go further and remove the conditions that allowed it to happen in the first place.
However, most victims of wealth inequality are not committing criminal acts such as the vandalising and ruining businesses. Individually, these businesses don't control most of the wealth, but together, smaller business employ millions of people. I believe that you can reduce instances of rioting by creating more equal distribution of wealth. However, before anybody does that, society has a right to expect nobody feels it right to destroy lives and impose violent anger on innocent people.
@thatcher88 It's an attitude, not money. More and more money has been thrown at this under class over the past 100 years and they have not got any better, infact they seem to have got far worse.
And they are going to continue bullying those who work for more and more money until the gap of classes wealth is closed. and Once that gap is closed, no one will want to work.
Do you really think people will go to work knowing they will be in the same position if they didn't?
@123Scears123 yes! And these people are hilarious, they claim they aren't progressing because people like my mum who owns a cleaning business, isn't paying enough tax. Well sorry but my mum only takes home 50k a year and has mortgage etc to pay, these people do not!
and they spend the money on drugs, alcohol etc and their kids always have designer clothes, it's no wonder they have nothing if they waste money like that.
@123Scears123 I'm sick and tired of people like you and me and our families having to work and pay tax and the tax is paying for this lot to buy their drugs and create mafias on the streets.
it's easy for labour MPs and guardian journalists, as they live in dominantly white-middle class areas like cornwall, they don't live in areas effected by Left-wing policy like Hounslow, hackey, Slough etc.
@EmpressTheresa Re: "people like me": what kind of person are you Theresa: do you have properties in "Hounslow, hackey [Hackney], Slough" or "etc": where do you pay your council tax :-) You seem a little "out of touch" with the localities you specifically mention since all three have opposition members in Parliament :-)
She stood up for Britain abroad, but didnt give a monkeys about her own people. Higher prices, more strikes, poorer services, millions out of work.............she was Evil
She manages to show her true attitudes by referring to the racist national front as the 'national unions'. Evil fucking bitch.
Her family made millions from investing in apartheid South Africa and having broken the industrial back of the UK she emigrated to the USA. Her best mate was Pinochet!
The reason I love this woman is simple. She stood up for Britain. Look at the state of the country when she became the Prime Minister. The economy and the country itself was in a very much better state when she left in 1990. If she did such a bad job, how did she get re-elected 3 times?
Yes, undoubtedly the economy was much improved after she left, but the way she did it was immoral, and claiming it really improved for the average person is utterly disingenuous. How many children had to go hungry because their parents couldn't feed them? How many people lost their jobs because she destroyed their industries? Why is Britain's wealth now so unequally divided and the rich in control of so much of the wealth, where the rich free to get rich, and the poor becoming poorer.
I was 2 days old when she gave her last speech in parliament and i have to say after watching her perform i admire her courage and will. She truly deserves the title of iron lady.
@mchap38834 Please explain why you love this woman and why, you must understand why, this question has been asked of you because of the wrong doing she did for this country, I hate this woman because she caned this country it made her and her son very rich, a lot of corruption went on when she was in government, look out it's going to be even harder with this present government it's only just began, pure corruption, and they are a law on too there selves just like the royal evil family.
SEGUN ELLA A LOS DICTADORES HABIA Q MOLERLOS A PALOS MIENTRAS Q DESPUES DE LA GUERRA SE ESTRECHABA LA MANO CON PINOCHET ,VIEJA PUTAAAAAAAAAAAAA
cashondo61 2 weeks ago
VOY A HACER UNA FIESTA CUANDO TE MUERAS VIEJA HIJA DE REMIL PUTASSSSSS
cashondo61 2 weeks ago
que vieja mas hija de puta, tenes maldad vieja decrépita
TheDe0101 3 weeks ago
Most charismatic politician ever.
Tsvetanof 1 month ago 2
@Tsvetanof She's up there with Winston. No others have come close since.
sexckatxx 1 month ago 2
@sexckatxx Who, Winston Silcott?
jackwilshiresfakeid 1 week ago
Thatcher for Prime Minister!
7beers 1 month ago 4
fuck her
apikopboy7 4 months ago
She looks here kind of like Leelee Sobieski ,the descendant of Polish King Jan III Sobieski. Just a impression.
Olhor10 5 months ago
british imperialists..... love how these pro britains and royalists still love everything from her.... her voice, her 'attitude' (neo-liberal-capitalist) , her turds? what else?
sebaz1982 6 months ago
Your first idea of companies who do not try and create jobs should be taxed is a good idea but your second is just stupid that is not how a successful economy works.
Also people should be able to feed their families but they will always be the less fortunate but people should be able to earn as much as possible because that is what should inspire people to be successful in life and if you limit what people earrn that is stepping in to marxism.
SupErFeRrit22 7 months ago
if only we could have a leader now with the balls she did i too hate TUC if you strike in a recesion you should loose your job the strikers should be lucky to have a job in the economy we have now and how stupid do you have to be to strike and not get paid when you have a family who need to be fed
SupErFeRrit22 7 months ago
@SupErFeRrit22 That's ridiculous, the point was they could barely feed their family when they were being paid! More to the point, why should some of Britain's hardest workers face the indignity of not being able to feed their families when the rich are given a free reign to get richer and control more and more of total wealth? In a recession, the rich who do not create jobs should be taxed and companies which take massive profits should be made to support their workers as living costs increase.
thatcher88 7 months ago
@thatcher88 Your first idea of companies who do not try and create jobs should be taxed is a good idea but your second is just stupid that is not how a successful economy works.
Also people should be able to feed their families but they will always be the less fortunate but people should be able to earn as much as possible because that is what should inspire people to be successful in life and if you limit what people earrn that is stepping in to marxism.
forgot to click reply first time
SupErFeRrit22 7 months ago
There is nothing wrong with suggesting that a company should distribute more of its profits and improve worker's rights and create more jobs. It is all very well to have inspiration, but as you admitted yourself, the 'less fortunate' will always exist in a neo-liberal society, and therefore, only a limited number can improve their lives through 'inspiration'. I think these people would prefer less lofty notions such as enough food for their kids or the ability to heat their homes...
thatcher88 7 months ago
@thatcher88 i disagree because if you give the workers everything they want the economy would fall in to colapse and everyone would be poor which is unfortunate i do not like it as much as you do but that is the way the world works i know i am sounding like a unheartful fuck but it is
SupErFeRrit22 7 months ago
I disagree with the assumption you make that ensuring hard working workers are able to feed their kids and heat their homes is the equivalent to giving workers 'everything they want'. It's an odd thing to say, because you imply workers want an endless supply of benefits. However, most workers want to be safe at work and be paid enough to have a reasonable standard of living. If our wonderful neo-liberal economy cannot even provide this to a great bulk of workers, then perhaps we must change.
thatcher88 6 months ago
@thatcher88 i did not mean it like that and have a look at the BA staff when they went on strike and the post office both have nothing to moan about BA staff had various perks which many would wish to have and the health and saftey at work act provides safe working conditions if you are familier with it.
SupErFeRrit22 6 months ago
Your hardly in a position to comment on whether the BA or post office staff have nothing to complain about. However, both companies, particularly BA, are in a position to cut the exorbitant salaries and re-direct some of the profit to their hardest working, yet lowest paid workers. Company directors need to start valuing these front line workers who keep these companies in existence. You cannot deny that a percentage of these workers are lowly paid, and struggling to pay for the basics.
thatcher88 6 months ago
@thatcher88 no but you have to admit they is a lot more people who would love to have the jobs that they went on strike for also this is going to go on forever so lets change the topic what are your thoughts on the london riots
SupErFeRrit22 6 months ago
There has to be a point that can't be crossed however in terms of workplace safety and salaries. Generally, it doesn't take long for these people to want the same things as the previous workers when they find their salaries won't cover living costs. As for the London riots, they are really difficult to understand, except that the acts are thuggish criminality. These people are an underclass who are excluded from society who recognize they are the victims of wealth inequality.
thatcher88 6 months ago
@thatcher88 that may be true for a minority of the rioters but for the most part they are out to loot and cause trouble just because they are criminals and i think the way we stop further riots in the future is to set an example and make the rioters arrested to pay for the damages out of their salaries at a monthly or weekly rate and to make them clear up the damage along with an apology to every buisness damaged this would make them respect authority and the community.
SupErFeRrit22 6 months ago
@SupErFeRrit22 I don't disagree that they are out to loot and cause trouble or that they are criminals. But I feel there is a connection between their criminality, looting and rioting and the fact many of these people, unlike those from the middle class, are quite disillusioned from the rest of society and also unable to participate in the economy as we do. I agree with your idea, but I think we must go further and remove the conditions that allowed it to happen in the first place.
thatcher88 6 months ago
@thatcher88 that is fair i guess well i have enjoyed our little debate fairwell.
SupErFeRrit22 6 months ago
However, most victims of wealth inequality are not committing criminal acts such as the vandalising and ruining businesses. Individually, these businesses don't control most of the wealth, but together, smaller business employ millions of people. I believe that you can reduce instances of rioting by creating more equal distribution of wealth. However, before anybody does that, society has a right to expect nobody feels it right to destroy lives and impose violent anger on innocent people.
thatcher88 6 months ago
@thatcher88 It's an attitude, not money. More and more money has been thrown at this under class over the past 100 years and they have not got any better, infact they seem to have got far worse.
And they are going to continue bullying those who work for more and more money until the gap of classes wealth is closed. and Once that gap is closed, no one will want to work.
Do you really think people will go to work knowing they will be in the same position if they didn't?
EmpressTheresa 4 months ago
@EmpressTheresa I couldn't agree more!
123Scears123 2 months ago
@123Scears123 yes! And these people are hilarious, they claim they aren't progressing because people like my mum who owns a cleaning business, isn't paying enough tax. Well sorry but my mum only takes home 50k a year and has mortgage etc to pay, these people do not!
and they spend the money on drugs, alcohol etc and their kids always have designer clothes, it's no wonder they have nothing if they waste money like that.
EmpressTheresa 2 months ago
@123Scears123 I'm sick and tired of people like you and me and our families having to work and pay tax and the tax is paying for this lot to buy their drugs and create mafias on the streets.
it's easy for labour MPs and guardian journalists, as they live in dominantly white-middle class areas like cornwall, they don't live in areas effected by Left-wing policy like Hounslow, hackey, Slough etc.
people like me do!
EmpressTheresa 2 months ago
@EmpressTheresa Re: "people like me": what kind of person are you Theresa: do you have properties in "Hounslow, hackey [Hackney], Slough" or "etc": where do you pay your council tax :-) You seem a little "out of touch" with the localities you specifically mention since all three have opposition members in Parliament :-)
elrjames777 1 week ago
haha she seems to like the police
unfad1ng 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DIE BITCH, DIE!!!
LordRassy 9 months ago
She stood up for Britain abroad, but didnt give a monkeys about her own people. Higher prices, more strikes, poorer services, millions out of work.............she was Evil
fustyans 9 months ago
Comment removed
aeronuk1 8 months ago
Bad karma has got her
cunningsophie 10 months ago
I left school the year this woman came to power. I reckon all you Thatcher fanboys are about 12 and have no idea what you are talking about!
MrGhostTube 11 months ago
She manages to show her true attitudes by referring to the racist national front as the 'national unions'. Evil fucking bitch.
Her family made millions from investing in apartheid South Africa and having broken the industrial back of the UK she emigrated to the USA. Her best mate was Pinochet!
Despicable human being!
MrGhostTube 11 months ago
No matter what your opinion of her, she was one of the most dominant figures of the 20th century. :)
KeViNkErR93 11 months ago
An attitude still relevant today. Thatcher forever!
Maddy4Me 11 months ago 17
@Maddy4Me do you have a problem?
PederReiersrud 3 weeks ago
good old maggie
SuperDanielclark 1 year ago 2
@SuperDanielclark Go fuck yourself. Thatcher was a cunt of the highest order. You are a spastic loving cunt for supporting her. FUCK YOU
LordRassy 9 months ago
her voice is kind of sexy...
thenewsophialoren 1 year ago 23
Great stuff - thanks for uploading !
thiocfaigharla 1 year ago 2
The reason I love this woman is simple. She stood up for Britain. Look at the state of the country when she became the Prime Minister. The economy and the country itself was in a very much better state when she left in 1990. If she did such a bad job, how did she get re-elected 3 times?
mchap38834 1 year ago
Yes, undoubtedly the economy was much improved after she left, but the way she did it was immoral, and claiming it really improved for the average person is utterly disingenuous. How many children had to go hungry because their parents couldn't feed them? How many people lost their jobs because she destroyed their industries? Why is Britain's wealth now so unequally divided and the rich in control of so much of the wealth, where the rich free to get rich, and the poor becoming poorer.
thatcher88 7 months ago
NorthNotsouth - Thank you very much for your comment, I am pleased that you like the clip - All the best - ThamesTV
ThamesTv 1 year ago 2
I was 2 days old when she gave her last speech in parliament and i have to say after watching her perform i admire her courage and will. She truly deserves the title of iron lady.
northnotsouth 1 year ago 2
@northnotsouth lucky you you didn't have to live through the SHIT she did
zghvbn1 1 year ago
Love love love this woman!!!
mchap38834 1 year ago
@mchap38834 Please explain why you love this woman and why, you must understand why, this question has been asked of you because of the wrong doing she did for this country, I hate this woman because she caned this country it made her and her son very rich, a lot of corruption went on when she was in government, look out it's going to be even harder with this present government it's only just began, pure corruption, and they are a law on too there selves just like the royal evil family.
pimple22 1 year ago