Please see the Climate Scientists' Register that the International Climate Science Coalition have created & has been endorsed by 137 climate experts since June 2010:
tinyurl[dot]com/2es3rqx
The Register states:
“We, the undersigned, having assessed the relevant scientific evidence, do not find convincing support for the hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide are causing, or will in the foreseeable future cause, dangerous global warming."
So let's take your logic a bit further... Who is funding the IPCC? Would that be the UN? Is the UN an unbiased group? Do they want world government and regulation? Do they select their scientists of choice for the IPCC? Why is it that agreeing with them is pre-requisite for the job? Ok, now who has more money, the UN or Exxon? Even if what you say is true, who gives a sh@$^?
why didn't you tell in your first post you're just another ignorable 'world -government' paranoid conspiricist.
would've saved everybody a whole lotta time if you would've said from the start you are not responding because you actually care about the science but just are into complot theories. I salut you sir. Farewell.
You might want to re-phrase that last part so it actually makes literary sense, I have a feeling most of your associates won't catch that though- Any luck on the Exxon proof yet? I could have saved you a lot of time by just pointing out the fact that you were lying in the first place, but that is much less fun than letting you figure it out yourself. You should practice abstract thinking before discrediting scientists in this, or any other, film- ciao
"Friends of Science" is double-speak for "anti-science lobby group". Dr Tim Ball is a Canadian journalist who acts as their chief propogandist..
This sort of anti-science propoganda is childs play to debunk but there are still plenty of people (mainly parochial americans) who think Al Gore invented AGW in 2005. They explify the arrogant american, they simply cannot comprend that the rest of the world are not buying into their domestic politics.
I just got finished with a retrofit 355 CID cheverolet small block into a 91 Porsche 928GT ! the car does 1/4 mile in 12.58 seconds! gets 10.5 MPG so : FUCK THE POLAR BEARS !! IM DRIVING MY PORSCHE!!!
to verify how ineffective carbon is we use atomic absorbtion spectometry and find if the entire atmosphere was carbon it would absorb no more than 8% of heat radiating from earth thus 20 years of AGW theory has produced no signature
To verify the validity of global warming, we need to do the following experiment: Put in a vessel 0.03% carbon dioxide , 1 % Water vapour, 78% Nitrogen & 21% Oxygen. We next expose the vessel to a given amount of solar radiation and we record its temperature. On another identical vessel, we repeat the same procedure except we change the proportion of carbon dioxide to its current proportion of 0.04%.
you know, all those sceptics are sponsored by big oil! here's a suggestion for u-- play the rockefeller game type in your fave enviro group followed by the word rockefeller and see if you can find one that hasnt taken his money . after that check out maurice strong the multi billionaire oil man who ran UNEP for 20 yrs the one who wrote the cheques yes he's also in on GM,Uranium etc if u control both sides u control the outcome-wake up!
Tim Ball has published 4 peer-reviewed studies over the entirety of his career. His work with "Friends of Science" has also been funded by the petroleum industry. I started watching this one with an open mind, but I don't find anything he's in credible. I have watched The Great Global Warming Swindle, too and a couple of scientists from it were misrepresented or mislead by the director. Frend Singer was also a "scientist" hired by the tobacco indstry to create doubt the smoking-cancer link.
My favorite quote HAS TO BE the one from the bigot at the Boston Globe, Ellen Goodman. Feb. 9, 2007 article titled 'No Change in Political Climate':
"I would like to say we're at a point where global warming is impossible to deny. Let's just say that global warming deniers are now on a par with Holocaust deniers, though one denies the past and the other denies the present and future."
When they stoop to this level of inveracity, they are essentially admitting defeat.
"In searching for a new enemy to unite us we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill." -- Club of Rome members Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider in their book 'The First Global Revolution".
the most telling evidence that global warming isn't real is something previous global warming deniers used was the global cooling in 1970s. Even if it was wrong it shows, because the CO2 was still high in 1970 so how was the earth cooling, it should have been warming still. I'm not saying that a species can't effect the climate, look at the first mass extinction, but i am saying that the climate as of right now hasn't changed because of us.
CO2 increase in the atmosphere has always followed warming, not the other way around. Guess what, the sun warms the earth, WOW what a concept! The oceans give off and take in CO2 with warming and cooling.
Human made global warming is a lie from anti-capitalist communist that are pissed they lost the cold war.
Sorry, TimDOG - Not at all true. IF the oceans were not significantly damaged then they MIGHT be able to consume the excess CO2 produced by human activity. Cars, buses, trucks, planes, industry - all add up to more and more CO2 in the atmosphere. Decimation of forests, increased ocean temps and dying corral. It won't be long before the proof that is in shows itself. Keep up the denial Timdog.
Liquid absorbs more gas when cooler, and less gas when heated (yes, this is the opposite relationship for liquids disolving solids). I am not sure what damage you are referring to that would change this basic concept of physics.
Perhaps you should look up "The Great Gloabal Warming Swindle" and look into some other view points. I have watched Al Gore's PowerPoint presentation (aka "An Inconvenient Truth") and I see why it is persuasive to those who do not have a firm undestanding of science; it is its simplicity that is so seductive to simple people.
tork - well, i guess you actually answered your own question. ocean temperatures have increased, thus (according to you) absorbing less. but, what i'm referring to is absorption of co2 by corral. increased deep water temp has killed a great deal of corral - man has polluted and over fished our oceans causing more damage.
Amen! And for those who do agree to this video: If it's somehow a whole lie that global warming is man-made, what do you think is right for our atmosphere? That we just keep on relying on pollution and oil? I don't see al gore's campeign for clean energy as something that could be detrimental to the world's future. Just because global warming "MAY" be false, it does not mean that the actions theorized to lead towards it are not harmful.
The second he said "...there is no evidence of humans being the cause," I stopped watching. You may be able to claim the existence of evidence to the contrary, but to say that there is no evidence of anthropogenic global warming is to forfeit your credibility.
Save the leaves you rake up in the fall. DO NOT use mass produced toilet paper. Toilet tissue is the most overprocessed form of paper, full of cancer-causing chemicals. Keep fall leaves buried in a hole to keep them from getting dry and scratchy.
The Oregon Petition — signed by 18,000 scientists world-wide states:
"There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate."
CO2 emission sources: Oceans-------59.5% Decaying vegitaion----17.9% Plant and animal respiration--17.9% Human made----4.7% (factories, cars, fireplaces, breathing, etc.) The human input of CO2 into the earth is insignificant compared to natural sources, i.e. 4.7% to 95.3%. Quit worrying about global warming.
On top of this Co2 is responsible for only about 4% of the overall effect greenhouse effect, water vapor being responsible for 95%. Only 0.2% to 0.3% of the greenhouse effect (depending on whose numbers you use) is due to emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases from human sources.
Halleluja... this is so simple. Only 4% of the greenhouse gasses consists of CO2. Only 10% of that is caused by human emissions. CO2 does not have as large an influence on the greenhouse effect as water vapor. Yet still, people claim CO2 is the main culprit for the greenhouse effect. This just doesn't make any sense at all...
Except that you forget to note that the natural emissions are balanced by natural sinks, resulting in a nett CO2 flux of 0.
Or more simply, if natural emissions are at 95.3 and natural sinks are at 95.3 the nett flux is 0. You add 4.7 to the sources and the nett flux becomes 4.7. (In practice the natural sinks take up some of our emissions and so the nett flux ends up being about 58% of what we add.)
The Revolution is beginning to take shape! We need to stop silencing science, quit intimidating researchers, and cease the extortion of the global salvationists! The watermelons (green on the outside/red [communist-socialist] in the core) are the real culprits of environmental degradation!
There is huge money giving voice to everyone and anyone disagreeing with the scientific consensus on global warming. That is of course in addition to those who are simply bribed. Unfortunately this sad lot mostly consisting of politicians and lobbyists includes some scientists too, though insignificant in numbers and status compared to the main stream. This video is just that, propaganda from big money with a vested interest.
CHECK OUT WIKIPEDIA "SCIENTIFIC OPINION ON CLIMATE CHANGE"!
This warmist nonsense has all the appearances of another socialist power grab. It is fueled by emotions, primarily fear and envy. The envy part is explicit, the fear is implicit -- these folks cannot force themselves to look in the mirror and realize that they produce nothing of exchange value to other individuals -- they envy capitalists and success of all stripe - their only recourse is to reduce the achievers to their level of mediocrity.
*Yawn* Every major scientific institution dealing with climate, ocean and atmosphere, agree that the climate is warming rapidly, and the primary cause is human CO2 emissions. They include: Royal Society of Canada, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Academie des Sciences (France), Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (Germany), Science Council of Japan, Russian Academy of Sciences, Royal Society (United Kingdom) and even National Academy of Sciences (United States of America)
governments are helpless regarding climate change , we are too arrogant to admit that our activities are not a drop in the ocean in the universe and would never change the climate, there was no gaz emission when the ice age happened and we didnt cause the extinction of the dinosaurs we are arrogant beings to admit that we can do nothing in the big universe
You really think the massive change of the face of the earth by humans will NOT effect the oh so thin layer of life on the globe? The dinosaurs (probably) disappeared because of a comet that hit the earth in ONE place and caused too much dust to form clouds. We're busy releasing all kinds of gasses allover the planet. Just take a look at google earth, there are areas where the earth is just PEOPLE-PEOPLE-MOREPEOPLE...
Pray that we still have people polluting and and not an asteroid or a comet , there we would have a global disaster and mass extinction but not from gaz emissions or hauman activities ..
Nice attempt by our "friends of science" but nothing new from the counter-side. The speaker intros with evidence that changed his view, but none was given here. Instead, unknown commentators are videoed. At least global warming theorists have data. Where's the beef?
JimDHart, answer this: how can there be a consensus among scientists that global warming is happening? Isn't it true that if there is a "consensus" then it really isn't science?
This has been flagged as spam show
Please see the Climate Scientists' Register that the International Climate Science Coalition have created & has been endorsed by 137 climate experts since June 2010:
tinyurl[dot]com/2es3rqx
The Register states:
“We, the undersigned, having assessed the relevant scientific evidence, do not find convincing support for the hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide are causing, or will in the foreseeable future cause, dangerous global warming."
Tom Harris
ICSC
TomHarrisICSC 1 year ago
Thanks Ian Clark- for having the courage to state your scientific convictions regardless of popularity-
keithmlarsen 2 years ago
@keithmlarsen
the proof of the funding of those people isn't all that hard.
Exxon yearly has to publish its books, including gifts. :)
ZeDollyDots 2 years ago
then it should be easy for you to prove, right?
So let's take your logic a bit further... Who is funding the IPCC? Would that be the UN? Is the UN an unbiased group? Do they want world government and regulation? Do they select their scientists of choice for the IPCC? Why is it that agreeing with them is pre-requisite for the job? Ok, now who has more money, the UN or Exxon? Even if what you say is true, who gives a sh@$^?
keithmlarsen 2 years ago
why didn't you tell in your first post you're just another ignorable 'world -government' paranoid conspiricist.
would've saved everybody a whole lotta time if you would've said from the start you are not responding because you actually care about the science but just are into complot theories. I salut you sir. Farewell.
ZeDollyDots 2 years ago
You might want to re-phrase that last part so it actually makes literary sense, I have a feeling most of your associates won't catch that though- Any luck on the Exxon proof yet? I could have saved you a lot of time by just pointing out the fact that you were lying in the first place, but that is much less fun than letting you figure it out yourself. You should practice abstract thinking before discrediting scientists in this, or any other, film- ciao
keithmlarsen 2 years ago
"Friends of Science" is double-speak for "anti-science lobby group". Dr Tim Ball is a Canadian journalist who acts as their chief propogandist..
This sort of anti-science propoganda is childs play to debunk but there are still plenty of people (mainly parochial americans) who think Al Gore invented AGW in 2005. They explify the arrogant american, they simply cannot comprend that the rest of the world are not buying into their domestic politics.
Tapecutter59 2 years ago
Fuck Al Gore, He thinks he's gonna pull this scam off? What a loser.
saltycreefer 2 years ago
obama=nobel bullshit prize winner.
luminatedgame 2 years ago
Al Gore and Goldman Sachs own N. America's only climate trading exchange in Chicago, CCX. They are set to make billions. AGW's a SCAM Suckers...
factorniner 2 years ago
Thank you for posting.
chewbaca1989 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Man has used technology to shelter from the elements, and the climate change theory eco-freaks want us all to be afraid of the weather.
It's just natural weather.
MRMILO57 2 years ago 2
Good information.
wwwMERTHcom 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LET THE POLAR BEARS SWIM!!!!
I just got finished with a retrofit 355 CID cheverolet small block into a 91 Porsche 928GT ! the car does 1/4 mile in 12.58 seconds! gets 10.5 MPG so : FUCK THE POLAR BEARS !! IM DRIVING MY PORSCHE!!!
BILLCLINTONCAUSED911 2 years ago
to verify how ineffective carbon is we use atomic absorbtion spectometry and find if the entire atmosphere was carbon it would absorb no more than 8% of heat radiating from earth thus 20 years of AGW theory has produced no signature
subbvert 2 years ago
To verify the validity of global warming, we need to do the following experiment: Put in a vessel 0.03% carbon dioxide , 1 % Water vapour, 78% Nitrogen & 21% Oxygen. We next expose the vessel to a given amount of solar radiation and we record its temperature. On another identical vessel, we repeat the same procedure except we change the proportion of carbon dioxide to its current proportion of 0.04%.
selti1 2 years ago
welcome Zedollydots to the hegelian mindtrap
you know, all those sceptics are sponsored by big oil! here's a suggestion for u-- play the rockefeller game type in your fave enviro group followed by the word rockefeller and see if you can find one that hasnt taken his money . after that check out maurice strong the multi billionaire oil man who ran UNEP for 20 yrs the one who wrote the cheques yes he's also in on GM,Uranium etc if u control both sides u control the outcome-wake up!
subbvert 2 years ago
Can anyone explain me why every poor climate skeptic in this video was offered (and accepted !) moneyfrom Exxon ?
Every single one !?
ZeDollyDots 3 years ago
Evidence?
Dust1Might 2 years ago
the books exxon mpublishes yearly in which they show where the money goes to
ZeDollyDots 2 years ago
Thats complete rubbish
rich17279 2 years ago
Comment removed
ZeDollyDots 2 years ago
google a while and check who is paying Ian Clark, Salie Baliunas, Timothy Ball etc.
wanna bet you meet a company named exxon ?
ZeDollyDots 2 years ago
Comment removed
keithmlarsen 2 years ago
Comment removed
keithmlarsen 2 years ago
The world has been cooling from 2005: The ice age is next!
JonThm 3 years ago
this vid is ancient...
anthonyfoxtrott 3 years ago
Tim Ball has published 4 peer-reviewed studies over the entirety of his career. His work with "Friends of Science" has also been funded by the petroleum industry. I started watching this one with an open mind, but I don't find anything he's in credible. I have watched The Great Global Warming Swindle, too and a couple of scientists from it were misrepresented or mislead by the director. Frend Singer was also a "scientist" hired by the tobacco indstry to create doubt the smoking-cancer link.
stama9 3 years ago
ture.
but more importantly, Tim Ball tells exactly what some people want to hear, so he MUST tell the truth, no ?
;-)
ZeDollyDots 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My favorite quote HAS TO BE the one from the bigot at the Boston Globe, Ellen Goodman. Feb. 9, 2007 article titled 'No Change in Political Climate':
"I would like to say we're at a point where global warming is impossible to deny. Let's just say that global warming deniers are now on a par with Holocaust deniers, though one denies the past and the other denies the present and future."
When they stoop to this level of inveracity, they are essentially admitting defeat.
Long live Sol.
pvsheridan 3 years ago
this make so much more sense. which I dont find in al gore's fiction book
Johnrosssssss 3 years ago 3
Scientists have understood about the urban heat island effect since the begining. urban data has been left out of all studies. This is lies.
carlwegenschimmel 3 years ago
"Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized nations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?"
-Maurice Strong, Head of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio and Executive Officer for Reform in the Office of the Secretary General of the U.N.
Hockeyfan22168 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"People only insist that a debate stop when they are afraid of what might be learned if it continues." - George Will
"Mann-made Global warming is the real false flag operation."- me
arkivx1 3 years ago 2
"In searching for a new enemy to unite us we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill." -- Club of Rome members Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider in their book 'The First Global Revolution".
neothomist1275 4 years ago 5
the most telling evidence that global warming isn't real is something previous global warming deniers used was the global cooling in 1970s. Even if it was wrong it shows, because the CO2 was still high in 1970 so how was the earth cooling, it should have been warming still. I'm not saying that a species can't effect the climate, look at the first mass extinction, but i am saying that the climate as of right now hasn't changed because of us.
jakehr3 4 years ago 3
WE MUST DESTROY CAPITALISM !!!!!!!!
SHMUJEW 4 years ago
Meh, it's better than communism.
Matheas 4 years ago
The comment above " WE MUST DESTROY CAPITALISM " is the real goal of the global warming extremist, wackos.
Human made global warming is a lie from anti-capitalist communist that are pissed they lost the cold war.
timDOGcrane 4 years ago 3
YES thank you- amen brother!!!
enterthetekken 4 years ago
Quick leaves are falling off the trees in fall!!!
We need a one world government and global carbon tax now!!!!
Its out of control people!!!!
Hollywood cant be wrong!
jec3073 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is a LARGE OIL FUNDED LIE!
6 billion people on the planet.
450 million active cars!
THIS VIDEO IS A LIE.
nlightnd07 4 years ago
CO2 increase in the atmosphere has always followed warming, not the other way around. Guess what, the sun warms the earth, WOW what a concept! The oceans give off and take in CO2 with warming and cooling.
Human made global warming is a lie from anti-capitalist communist that are pissed they lost the cold war.
timDOGcrane 4 years ago 8
Sorry, TimDOG - Not at all true. IF the oceans were not significantly damaged then they MIGHT be able to consume the excess CO2 produced by human activity. Cars, buses, trucks, planes, industry - all add up to more and more CO2 in the atmosphere. Decimation of forests, increased ocean temps and dying corral. It won't be long before the proof that is in shows itself. Keep up the denial Timdog.
nlightnd07 4 years ago
Liquid absorbs more gas when cooler, and less gas when heated (yes, this is the opposite relationship for liquids disolving solids). I am not sure what damage you are referring to that would change this basic concept of physics.
TorkelUF 4 years ago 4
Perhaps you should look up "The Great Gloabal Warming Swindle" and look into some other view points. I have watched Al Gore's PowerPoint presentation (aka "An Inconvenient Truth") and I see why it is persuasive to those who do not have a firm undestanding of science; it is its simplicity that is so seductive to simple people.
TorkelUF 4 years ago 2
tork - well, i guess you actually answered your own question. ocean temperatures have increased, thus (according to you) absorbing less. but, what i'm referring to is absorption of co2 by corral. increased deep water temp has killed a great deal of corral - man has polluted and over fished our oceans causing more damage.
nlightnd07 4 years ago
Amen! And for those who do agree to this video: If it's somehow a whole lie that global warming is man-made, what do you think is right for our atmosphere? That we just keep on relying on pollution and oil? I don't see al gore's campeign for clean energy as something that could be detrimental to the world's future. Just because global warming "MAY" be false, it does not mean that the actions theorized to lead towards it are not harmful.
numbers93 3 years ago
The second he said "...there is no evidence of humans being the cause," I stopped watching. You may be able to claim the existence of evidence to the contrary, but to say that there is no evidence of anthropogenic global warming is to forfeit your credibility.
bat200 4 years ago
OMG. All of these "scientists" are paid by oil companies. And check out desmogblog for the scoop on the "Friends of Science". What bullshat.
singlexy 4 years ago
Nice to see that the debate is still ongoing, even though there are plenty of socialist control freaks who wish it wasn't! globalwarminghoax. net
noplebian 4 years ago
Save the leaves you rake up in the fall. DO NOT use mass produced toilet paper. Toilet tissue is the most overprocessed form of paper, full of cancer-causing chemicals. Keep fall leaves buried in a hole to keep them from getting dry and scratchy.
GreenRespect 4 years ago
get less kids less people who crap less toilet paper made voila
boxingisbest 4 years ago
The Oregon Petition — signed by 18,000 scientists world-wide states:
"There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate."
forkeat 4 years ago 2
forkeat 4 years ago
On top of this Co2 is responsible for only about 4% of the overall effect greenhouse effect, water vapor being responsible for 95%. Only 0.2% to 0.3% of the greenhouse effect (depending on whose numbers you use) is due to emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases from human sources.
jackson32 4 years ago
Halleluja... this is so simple. Only 4% of the greenhouse gasses consists of CO2. Only 10% of that is caused by human emissions. CO2 does not have as large an influence on the greenhouse effect as water vapor. Yet still, people claim CO2 is the main culprit for the greenhouse effect. This just doesn't make any sense at all...
BasKooij 4 years ago
Except that you forget to note that the natural emissions are balanced by natural sinks, resulting in a nett CO2 flux of 0.
Or more simply, if natural emissions are at 95.3 and natural sinks are at 95.3 the nett flux is 0. You add 4.7 to the sources and the nett flux becomes 4.7. (In practice the natural sinks take up some of our emissions and so the nett flux ends up being about 58% of what we add.)
hintaweb 4 years ago
Al Gore is my sheperd
He is only aware of what he wants
He makes me lie down on park benches outside his mansion
He leads me beside the polluted water of his strip mine
He restores my doubt in brain dead politicians
He leads me in the path of Kyoto for his legacy sake
His lies make children sleepless
Though I walk dark in my house his 4 are lit like Vegas
Surely his lust for power will follow me all the days of my life
And I will see votes held to the light on thanksgiving forever
letzfaceit 4 years ago
The Revolution is beginning to take shape! We need to stop silencing science, quit intimidating researchers, and cease the extortion of the global salvationists! The watermelons (green on the outside/red [communist-socialist] in the core) are the real culprits of environmental degradation!
Anthropogenic global warming is a hoax!
keepontruckin87 4 years ago
The cult of manmade global warming is leftist BS.
dougroadster 4 years ago
This is bullshit!
annajosefine 4 years ago
There is huge money giving voice to everyone and anyone disagreeing with the scientific consensus on global warming. That is of course in addition to those who are simply bribed. Unfortunately this sad lot mostly consisting of politicians and lobbyists includes some scientists too, though insignificant in numbers and status compared to the main stream. This video is just that, propaganda from big money with a vested interest.
CHECK OUT WIKIPEDIA "SCIENTIFIC OPINION ON CLIMATE CHANGE"!
SnowJackal717 5 years ago
Because wikipedia is the bastion of unbiased political truth.
prnd3825 5 years ago
stupid people, who paid for your movie? hmm, let me guess....
tomdolinger 5 years ago
This warmist nonsense has all the appearances of another socialist power grab. It is fueled by emotions, primarily fear and envy. The envy part is explicit, the fear is implicit -- these folks cannot force themselves to look in the mirror and realize that they produce nothing of exchange value to other individuals -- they envy capitalists and success of all stripe - their only recourse is to reduce the achievers to their level of mediocrity.
ce5k 5 years ago 2
Yeah, of course its bull shit brains - all this lot are on the pay roll of the "lefties" or "the greens". Wake up dickhead.
wordofmouse 5 years ago
*Yawn* Every major scientific institution dealing with climate, ocean and atmosphere, agree that the climate is warming rapidly, and the primary cause is human CO2 emissions. They include: Royal Society of Canada, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Academie des Sciences (France), Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (Germany), Science Council of Japan, Russian Academy of Sciences, Royal Society (United Kingdom) and even National Academy of Sciences (United States of America)
wordofmouse 5 years ago
governments are helpless regarding climate change , we are too arrogant to admit that our activities are not a drop in the ocean in the universe and would never change the climate, there was no gaz emission when the ice age happened and we didnt cause the extinction of the dinosaurs we are arrogant beings to admit that we can do nothing in the big universe
luxeden 5 years ago
You really think the massive change of the face of the earth by humans will NOT effect the oh so thin layer of life on the globe? The dinosaurs (probably) disappeared because of a comet that hit the earth in ONE place and caused too much dust to form clouds. We're busy releasing all kinds of gasses allover the planet. Just take a look at google earth, there are areas where the earth is just PEOPLE-PEOPLE-MOREPEOPLE...
nosfoe78 5 years ago
Pray that we still have people polluting and and not an asteroid or a comet , there we would have a global disaster and mass extinction but not from gaz emissions or hauman activities ..
luxeden 5 years ago
Pathethic rejection of well researched up to date data
bylyurheid 5 years ago
Nice attempt by our "friends of science" but nothing new from the counter-side. The speaker intros with evidence that changed his view, but none was given here. Instead, unknown commentators are videoed. At least global warming theorists have data. Where's the beef?
JimDHart 5 years ago
JimDHart, answer this: how can there be a consensus among scientists that global warming is happening? Isn't it true that if there is a "consensus" then it really isn't science?
bdsmawd 5 years ago