Added: 2 years ago
From: CreationMinistries
Views: 287
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Yes, they date the rocks by the 'index' fossils. If you have a rock with a dinosaur fossil, you know it is at least 65 million years old.  Is that too hard for creationists to understand. It is that well established.

    .

    The Geologic Column exists everywhere. IT IS A TIME SCALE

  • @gregrutz Come on Greg. Even old-earth daters are trying to distance themselves from their index fossils which have bee showing up alive today by the DOZENS. They have become a total embarrassment to old earth BELIEFS! Read up on "Lazarus Taxon."

  • Russ, How do you explain all the fuss about dinosaurs having feathers?

  • Evos are trying to convince gullible people that dinos changed into birds so now dinosaurs have feathers! As with all Darwinian tales, no viable evidence of this exists nor do reptiles contain the genetic data to form feathers.

  • I was on wiki and they claim feathered fossils are showing up all the time. They claim to even have found quill knobs. I don't believe it's conceivable that dinosaurs became bird (since birds appear first in their timeline anyway) but what do you suppose they are seeing? Do you have a video on the Dino-bird hoax?

  • These are the same folks who clim we evolved from a rock and back it up with fraud after fraud in textbooks.

    They have found some hair-like remnants so of course they becaome "feathers" in the land of Darwinism...which must be somewhere over the rainbow because NO EVIDENCE exists here on planet earth

  • I get the odd feeling I'm being ignored.

  • Nope. Between speaking, traveling, writing books and more I can't respond to the 50 comments I get every single day from folks who are upset that I stand up for the one true God, Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior

  • The corruption in paleontology is not unlike the corruption of pharmaceutical companies. Falsified science abounds and is used to support the evolution religion.

    It is an affront to true science.

  • Ah, so the global flood with all its raging currents conveniently placed specific creatures with other specific creatures in specific layers all over the earth in such a manner that beyond all reasonable doubt suggests evolution did, indeed, happen. Except it actually didn't, and this is evident by the word of the holy bible.

    I have seen the light!

  • I suggest you check your light bulb:

    Strata layers are in a mixed order and the fossil record is a total refutation of Darwinism

  • No, they aren't

  • I think you're lying.

  • Easy enough to prove who is wrong.

    Provide us with 10 places where the earth's strata have the 12 primary layers of the Geologic Column/Time Scale are found in the correct order (including its corresponding Index Fossils). It NEVER HAS BEEN FOUND so good luck as you will discover who is "lying"

  • Why ten? Would one not suffice? Either way, I'm not going to provide you with any - I'm not the one who thinks we 'should' find a vertical lineup of every stratum on this planet. Strata don't form under just any condition, let alone remain intact for hundreds of millions of years.

    It's irrelevant, anyway: there's no issue with constructing the column from more than a single location.

  • Need I say more?

  • Need you say more? You could, you know, reply to the points I raised. Laid out:

    1. We shouldn't expect to find the geological column nicely stacked up, anywhere. I've presented you with two examples anyway.

    2. Even so, this doesn't mean we can't accurately compile geologic strata from multiple locations.

  • Okay I lied. I did manage to find two examples, courtesy of TalkOrigins:

    Bonaparte Basin of Australia (Trendall et al. 1990, 382, 396)

    Williston Basin of North Dakota (Morton 2001)

  • The track record reveals we can not simply accept secular humanist claims as I reveal throughout our videos. Here they claim that the 12 layers are there in the correct order by which old earth ages are derived, however, 92% of these layers are not there. In fact, when we examine the overall picture humanists only claim that 4 tenths of 1% of the earth's crust contains about 8% of the projected Geologic Column - hardly confidence building support for old earth beliefs

  • "we can not simply accept secular humanist claims"

    Yeah, because religious folk are always right. All advances in science are atheistic methods of supporting godless worldviews.

    Is this going to be your only response to counter-evidence? If so, we're done.

    "92% of these layers are not there."

    Source?

  • Religious folks are not always right. Secular Humanists, who worship the religious philosophy of Naturalism - which is based upon "millions of years leading to Darwinism" - have destroyed our scientific and educational establishments, taking us from # ONE in the world in science, math and overall education, to almost DEAD LAST And gee, I feel so bad that I haven't taken the time you want me to take to respond in the manner you want me to respond....I will miss you terribly

  • First off, there are plenty of religious evolutionary biologists. It isn't a cult. And it isn't a strictly secular science.

    Second, evolution is a scientific theory, surmounted from documented evidence. Creationism is pure doctrine. Which is the detriment to education?

  • First, I thought I would not be hearing from you again....? Second, I never said "millions of years leading to Darwinism" was a cult - just a religious belief that is being taught as if it were science Third, when we taught biblical creation in our schools we were NUMBER ONE in the world in science, math and overall education, now we are almost DEAD LAST The proof of the pudding is in the eating

  • Damn right. Those liberals will do anything to spread the lies.

  • Thats easy, anywhere, seeing as how things like uplifting folding and angular uncomformities are about as subtle as an elephant in the living room.

  • All best fitting a worldside flood

  • Not even a little bit.

  • please disregard my last comment. What i meant to say is dating rocks is not possible because the geometric column does not exist.

  • Great Video, Russ! Thanks! Keep em' comin'!

  • Find a single whale in a layer with a single trilobite, then your premise may have a little credit.

  • You have things backwards.

    I say the earth's crust was destroyed in a global flood so ocean floor dwelling creatures would be found in the lowest layers

    This is exactly what is found - trilobites are perfect examples

    Darwinists think being in the same layer is proof of living together so please show us a fossilized chicken in a layer with a fossilized human. We know they live together so this should not be a problem unless your starting presuposition is wrong - which it is

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more