Sukhoi Su-35 BM

[millardcasey24]

This is one very "standing" video. =p

[olbywong717c]

Your video is a favorite on Maldives

[JURANDIRDOMINGOS]

O BRASIL TEM QUE COMPRAR ESTE TIPO DE ARMAMENTO, E NAO REFUGO VELHO DOS ESTADOS UNIDOS

[TheRadioman1976]

"The Flanker's Irbis-E radar is indeed far more powerful than the Raptor's APG-77." Excellent! The more powerful the radar, the more easily detectable it will be to AWAC's type aircraft. Think about it this way: you have someone coming after you at night looking for you with a powerful flashlight. You can spot him first before he sees you. In that way, you can kill the man with the flashlight first.

[Thecampercz]

@decription

Yes me friend, but 30 Nautical miles is still like more than 50 Km wich is still really big range, you cant shoot missiles at so much distant, the enemy will just turn 180 and run away and missiles launched will eventually be out of fuel and explodes in the air..

[mauricioalfredo83]

f22 c**k suckers still dont get there is NO stealth against this Sukoi.....by the way a russian made stealth technology like 30 years ago and he told it to usa

[qbonumber1]

way better than the F-15.

The F-22 requieres 30 hours of maintence for every hour flying.

in my opinion the Su-35 is a way better plane than any of these

[ricjan33]

But the funny part of it all is that all 20 F-35 are still standing too rusty. Now they are 186 F-22 still and 20 F-35 still, all fighters are still invisible

[ricjan33]

The US Air Force has stopped flying all Lockheed Martin F-22s for an indefinite period, shashashasha

[ricjan33]

All F-22 aircraft of Wonder Woman are all rusted stuck indefinitely shit shashashashasha

[EkulGgats]

What a gorgeous aircraft. Needs canards, though! I wonder why they haven't made them standard-

[GreekArmy57]

@MegaILIRIA SU 35BM IS THE BEST IN THE WORLD!!!!

[Elfulcrum777]

NATO may call this warbird flanker E but for me its Terminator 

[ACX2008]

The Su-35BM and F-22A are both impressive aircraft and I pray we never see them duke it out, unless its an international airshow

[wierdosinc]

isnt the su 35 bm the finished version of the su-37 prototype?

[JimRaynor55]

"Craptor"...These Russian fanboy vids are so funny. The RCS of a Raptor is not 0.001m^2, you need to insert another zero to get into the ballpark. The IRBIS-E would have horrible detection range against the Raptor, and if the unstealthy Flanker radiates it will be even easier to pick up with the Raptor's passive sensors.

[N1cholas240]

@JimRaynor55 The RCS of a Raptor is not 0.001m^2,

Your right the RCS of a f-22 is 0.0001m2. 0.001M2 is a F-35 rcs.

[1990PatMorrison]

correction the F-22's RCS is .0001m^2 which the Su-35BM can detect at 20 km

[sergiobaires367]

the best best best and beautiful combat aircraft!!! russian aircraft is the best

[AgentxAnonymous]

I think a lot of people don't know that the US fighters can't engage beyond visual range, so that completely screws the F22 superiority theory...

[illogicallyinclined]

@AgentxAnonymous

On the contrary, all modern US fighters are built for BVR engagement. What the F-22 does lack is good IRST for comparatively closer engagements.

[tramvaj12]

@AgentxAnonymous but even if you can I do not think that the missiles invisible so you do not have use to shot from long distance, you can easily over maneuver it

[AgentxAnonymous]

The F22 can barely keep up with the F-15. Not to put down the Eagle, but these next gen Su's are jew dropping.

Then need to put 2D thrust vectoring on these..

[AgentxAnonymous]

@AgentxAnonymous Jaw *

[illogicallyinclined]

@AgentxAnonymous

If memory serves, all Su-35s have full 3d thrust vectoring based on the prototype Su-37, as opposed to the F-22's 2d thrust vectoring.

[KARASAWA40]

The Su-35 has been estimated at over $60 million, the F-22 costs $143 million.

[38602]

i'd prefer to listen imperial march from starwars ))

[pR05t0]

why is has no canards?

[itom95]

@pR05t0 to reduce the it's RCS. putting canards can severely increase its RCS, making it a sitting duck against BVR missiles. also, this Su-35BM is lighter, so it has the same maneuverability like the old Su-35, and it doesn't need canards.

old Su-35 with canards' RCS = 20+m2

Su-35BM's RCS = 0.7-0.9m2

thats a damn big difference.

[pR05t0]

@itom95 thats right, thats a lot of square meters...  hope they know what they are doing ;)

[SilentEagles]

IRBIS-E Snow Leopard Export Only (Su-35BM)

-Effective tracking range for RCS = 3 m2 target:(350-400 km)

-Target number of TWS at the same time:(30 Targets, engage 8 aerial targets)

-Coverage in Elevation:(60 degrees)

-Azimuth coverage boosts to (120 degrees.)

-Small Air Target Detection Range 90 km (49 nm)

-Antenna Diameter:(900 mm)

[SpetsnazPower]

@SilentEagles

Really how is the APG-77 superior to NO35 Ibris?

N035 Ibris detection of RCS 3m2= 400km

APG-77 detection of RCS 3m2= 270-300km

N035 Ibris detection of RCS 1m2= 300km

APG-77 detection of RCS 1m2= 210km

N035 Ibris detection of RCS 0.1m2= 165km

APG-77 detection of RCS 0.1-0.3m2= 150km

N035 can detect RCS up to 0.01m2 of 90km and the APG-77 cant

[SilentEagles]

APG-77 v 1 Part 2:

-Performing A-A and A-G modes at the same time:(Yes)

-Low Probability of Intercept Radar capability:(Yes)

-High speed capability of Data-link/communication:(Yes)

-Advanced functions for Microwave-weapon / CPU virus spreader/ Net-Hacker:(Yes)

[SilentEagles]

APG-77 v 1 (F-22 AESA radar)

-Effective tracking range for RCS = 1 m2 target:(200-240 km planned upgrades will allow a range of 250 miles (400 km) or more in narrow beams.)

-Target number of TWS at the same time:(100 aerial/ground targets)

-Horizontal tracking angles:(+/- 60 degrees (May equip conformal lateral AESA in the future)

-Style of antenna:(AESA, 2,000 T/R)

-MTBF (mean time between failures):(800~1,000 hrs)

[SilentEagles]

IRBIS-E Snow Leopard doesn't had superiority over APG-77 v 1. So nice tried ricjan33. Ausairpower say Irbis-e doesn't claim superiority over APG-77 v 1.

[hospitalerknight]

in vietnam the "ace" was northvietnam pilot not an american

[farecars]

Most of us know that russian technology was hyped by the U.S and British. Now the cold war is over we can't justify these lies for defence expenditure. The fact remains Russian engines and Rockets are good, flight control systems and weapon guidance are 1950's.

[959735]

@farecars Arschloch

[APACA]

F22 is dead

[USAAIRPOWER]

F-22 Raptor AESA Radar the AN/APG-77 (v) 1 is way superior and advance than Su-35BM Super Flanker AESA Radar the IRBIS-E! The AN/APG-77 could track 100 targets compare to IRBIS-E only track 30 target. AN/APG-77 Radar Warning Receiver track 463 km or more. Also 125-150 miles (200-240 km) against 1 m2 (11 sq ft) targets (estimated range). The IRBIS-E only track 400 km against 2 m2. I guess ricjan33 is really stupid. I got proof while he doesn't had any proof that IRBIS-E is superior than AN/APG-77

[KARASAWA40]

I think the PESA Irbis is more powerful, but people forget that it doesn't matter since the F-22 is stealth and has an LPI AESA. Against the F-22, it's pretty much a giant "shoot here" sign. However, the Su-35 should be able to search with its IR and communicate with AWACS, etc. However, the F-22 still has the advantage since its radar is LPI.

Do you have any sources on the AN/APG-77 performance? I'd like to see it if you do.

[Frbymic]

zizo847 cut the crap

[zizo847]

china took down 2 f 22.

[Archy11102]

ROFLMFAO - If China took 2 F-22s then I'm second jesus christ... and if by any chance your claim is true then when was that and which airplane or SAM they used? J-10 LOL

Chinese can't build a decent engine yet alone to shoot down 2 F-22s

Anyways, I'd love to see Russia to take part in Red Flag exercise if that's possible. In that case USAF and RuAF would know for a fact which airforce has better "birds"

[zizo847]

so the video of the chinese took 2 f22 is faked is that what you mean?okay look at the blue and red team results.maybe china can not make a sam that able to track the f22 but russ can i think.

[Rip1969]

Irbis-E radar is no way near as good as the an/apg-77 on the F-22.

Irbris-e is an older type PESA radar, vs. a modern AESA radar found on the F-22.

At 125 miles the Irbris can detect a 3 m2 object, howver at the distance the F-22 is said to have an RCS somewhere aroun .002 m2. That means the Irbris-E wouldn;t be able to detect the F-22 until about 25nm away.

Mean while the f-22's AN/APG-77 radar would have locked onto the Su-35bm at about 250nm away.

First shot first kill.. Raptor.

[Spetsnazovets]

Problem with your idea is that if F-22 uses its radar it discloses itself. If radar is turned on, it gets intercepted and appears on a radar of Su. F-22 is designed to operate using an AWACS to survey the area and send the F-22 the picture via datalink. Without someone beaming it the picture it has to use its own radar and hence negate its stealth advantage. AWACS is VERY vulnerable to SAMs especially SA5, SA-10, SA20 and SA-21 so would be used sparingly. So F-22 isn't not that hard to find.

[gametariq]

it's not like wether the f-22 will turn the radar on or off..the apg-77 will detect and lock on the su-35bm before the su-35 even knows there's an aircraft around..

the biggest problem to russians now is the small rcs of the f-22...X band radars can detect it but it will be late as hell,,i heard there will be an AESA radar to install in the su-35 soon,,and i heard also that russians now are developin' the radars that works on the L band..!! plus improvin' their OLS systems

[Rip1969]

THe AESA rada on the raptor changes it's frequency in X-band 1000's of times a second. Irbis-e is a pesa radar wic does not work in X-band. Also to remember PESA radars frequency change is pretty poor, around 100 in about 5 seconds. SO trying to detect an AESA radar i very very unlikely.

AWACS flies100's of miles away from the theatre, so no need to worry about SAM's. F-22 Is capable of performing fowards air controller missions.

[Rip1969]

AESA radar on the raptor changes it's frequency in X-band 1000's of times a second. Irbis-e is a pesa radar does not work in X-band. Also to remember PESA radars frequency change is pretty poor, around 100 in about 5 seconds. SO trying to detect an AESA radar i very very unlikely.

AWACS flies100's of miles away from the theatre, so no need to worry about SAM's. F-22 Is capable of performing fowards air controller missions.

[adrastea99]

AESA on the other hand is useless against stealth craft, which is why it isn't found on the Sukhoi although Phazotron does produce AESA

Irbis is designed to detect small objects moving fast which is how F22 appears on radar, and the Sukhoi would lock on at about 100nm

The F22 cannot use it's APG77 radar at full range without making itself known, so it can't really lock onto anything farther than 50nm at which point the passive radar can lock on

[Archy11102]

yeah right - radar. russians made stronger radar while USAF simply uses AWACS which share the info with F-22s computer. stronger radar means that plane which uses it is easier to detect - same as the ground AA defenses which have to switch on and off their radar so they don't get detected. F-22 has impressive record against F-15E (the most successful aircraft with ratio of 100+ kills and 0 losses) in sim. fights. I'm not American(4 the record) but somehow I doubt that Su-35 is better than F-22

[Spetsnazovets]

It isn't better. Its designed to beat the gen-4 fighters. Its gen4++ and can beat all gen4 planes in existence. To compete with F-22 there is a 5-gen fighter being made by MiG and Su. Its already flown. However its still Top Secret and will be revealed when it will be officially accepted into RuAF

[Rip1969]

"there is a 5-gen fighter being made by MiG and Su. Its already flown. However its still Top Secret "

THats a bunch of billshit... If it's so secret, how do you know about it?

[Spetsnazovets]

They stated that it flown but all the details are secret. Thats what i meant. As for radar interception i must have missaid something. Its not only radar that detects things. RWR does too and warns pilot. As for AWACS, It has to fly within roughly 200km from frontline to be able to timely warn fighters of incoming enemy. Too close for safety from S-300PMU2, S-300PMU1 and S-400. F-22 gets cued via datalink to targets, without that, its stealth is blown away by its radar use. multi-freq scanning.

[KARASAWA40]

F-22 radar is LPI, it does not automatically gve itself away. The F-22 can beam its radar directly at another plane and not be detected.

[Spetsnazovets]

depends on how fast the freq scan happens on RWR. Some RWR systems today have multiple scanners and scan several freq at once. But yet again: low probability yes but HOW low? Its all relative.

I'm not bagging F-22. Just merely stating that there are plenty of ways to detect it before it enters a useful missile range. Just cos missile range is say 200km doesn't mean that thats from how far you fire at another fighter.

Also the stealth fluctuates as plane maneuvers.

[KARASAWA40]

It's not just a matter of being able to scan all frequencies, the freq jump is random, so even if something is picked up, it may not be identified as a threat, but as noise. I don't know how low the F-22's PI is, but I'm sure it's low enough to greatly reduce the ability to detect the plane.

I'm very aware that max range is not when you fire a missile, but the F-22 isn't going to fly straight in and hope it's not seen. Tactics will be a part of it to, take a route that is stealthy.

[KARASAWA40]

Also, yes maneuvers effect stealth, but overall, the F-22's RCS is going to be low, and the chance it's detected is low. And like I said before, tactics. Avoid the enemy radar, limit movements to only those necessary.

[Spetsnazovets]

YOu ain't gonna hear argument from me. In my opinion comparing Su-35 to F-22 is actually an incorrect thing since they are from different generations. F-22 would be comparing to PAK-FA when its deployed. It is harder to detect F-22 then a gen-4 plane. I'd love to see F-22 radar detection range vs RSC graph.

In Oz we can see all planes in the air with OTH radar. Range of detection HUGE. L-band renders RCS and RAM irrelevant.

[GIANNHSPEIRAIAS]

because they make the f22 invisible in x band only but since the 35 bm has a l band too the game is over^^

[KARASAWA40]

The F-22 was design for all aspect multi frequency stealth. The F-35 is the one that is limited primarily to X band. The Su-35's L band will probably aid in tracking the F-22, but it will not completely negate its stealth. Also, even in the F-22 is detected, it can beat the Su-35. The F-22's performance is not stealth dependent at all.

[GIANNHSPEIRAIAS]

f22 and f3 is only stealth at x band the band tat mainly russia use there is not an aircraft who can be stealth from a to q band its simply a constructive matter nothing more the ram particle isnt nanoeffective

[KARASAWA40]

ausairpower, net / APA - 2009 - 01, h t m l

Replace the ",' with "." and remove spaces. Scroll down to stealth shaping, their main concern is how the F-35 is X band only, while other stealth fighters aren't. RAM is not the issue, it is wave mechanics, when λ is less than the characteristic size of something, controlled scatter is difficult, but it does not mean stealth is completely blown away.

[GIANNHSPEIRAIAS]

my god just restart your mind i think that it need a defragment..

there are two ways to discover a stealth one is to the airplane to carried out weapons in external hooks and the other is from the exaust heat

+ that is no matter now coz whoever has the mica ir in their weaponry is a stealth killer fire and forget missile without needed lock from the plane...

[KARASAWA40]

Stealth applies to all emissions (in the case of F-22, B-2, F-117, and F-35), IR included. Again, IR is not an automatic stealth killer. IR has low detection range and poor performance in bad weather. MICA IR, R-77T, whatever, they will not prove insurmountable to stealth fighters planes as the planes were designed to counter these things from the start.

[stalingradComando]

@KARASAWA40

That`s funny because stealth has bad performance in bad weather too. The F22`s RAM coating for example is easily damaged by rain thus making it much easier to spot for all-weather Su35`s

[KARASAWA40]

The F-22 can fly in any weather with no degradation in performance. You are thinking about the F-117 and B-2 which relied on RAM heavily. The F-22 and F-35 do not, and can fly in all weather easily. The F-22 has operated in Alaska and Guam without any negative effect on stealth by weather.

[stalingradComando]

@KARASAWA40

F22`s RAM is still affected by rain. B2`s and F117 couldn`t fly at all but even the F22 is affected by rain storms

[KARASAWA40]

No it isn't, the plane was rained on in Guam and suffered no loss of stealth effectiveness, from the beginning the USAF knew that not having all weather capability would make the plane much less effective so it was requirement that the plane had to perform in all weather.

[GIANNHSPEIRAIAS]

its bvr and f22 dont have the capability to discover those missile(basicly noone aircraft can discover them because they are in silent mode until they reach within 5nm of the target)

[gomsc011]

And Su-27 wasnt shot down in air fight. Su-27 statistics:

0 shot down by enemy

6 enemy fighters shot down by Su-27.

That planes are MiG-29s.

[Zeljko9292]

watch?v=JDfz1dSciGE

[USAAIRPOWER]

According to this video there isn't proof that IRBIS-E is superior than APG-77. Where is the proof the last time I check on ausairpower website they say that there isn't proof that IRBIS-E is far superior than APG-77.

[KGOldWolf]

How much longer with the battle for air supremecy be fought by piloted planes? Drones can fly without the restriction on G force human limitations. The Predator is beginning to show the effectiveness of Drone warfare. I am not military nor am I a war monger... I am just an American who sees the inevitable progress of technology. Let's hope for peace and turn swords back into plowshares.....

[djsal510]

actually US is losing its edge when it comes to air power russia china and india are advancing faster than US. Even one of th air force general stated it.

[USAAIRPOWER]

Oh please Russia & China haven't prove a worthy air force in the sky. The last time I check USA fighter aircraft blast your Sukhoi/Mig fighter out of the sky of Korea, Vietnam, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Iraq, & Serbia. Soo much for advancing faster aircraft than USA. Russia & China fighter aircraft are still weak & less advance then USA.

[ratibornet]

You know what, USAAIRPOWER, the Third World War is pending and we will see whose planes are Kings of the Sky! Remember this.

[USAAIRPOWER]

HA! WORLD WAR 3 IS ALREADY DEAD. AFTER ALL RUSSIA lost the cold war. So there won't be world war 3. Russia is still weak like Soviet Union.

[ratibornet]

Obviously, USAAIRPOWER you're prejudiced. Moreover, cold war was not the 3rd world war, simply because it didn't encompassed the whole globe and because there were not any open confrontations between US and USSR soldiers, whereas, the 3rd world war will kill about 2 billion people.

[ratibornet]

Furthermore, how can you state that the country is weak if it has nukes as much as US has. If there hadn't been mutual deterrence, the Earth would already have died. US would've attacked, as you said, weak Soviet Union (recollect the plan of Allen Dulles for instance). But they didn't, 'cos they were scared. And USSR didn't lose the cold war to USA, it lost it to itself. Finally, there can't be any impartial speculations about superiority of any aircraft before they meet each other face to face.

[USAAIRPOWER]

Russian Mig-15, Mig-17, Mig-19, Mig-21, Mig-23, Mig-25, Mig-29, Mig-33, Mig-31, Mig-35, Su-27, & Su-30 fail to become King of The Sky & Air Dominant. In order to be King of The Sky you must destroyed over 100 enemy aircraft in war, beat your rival in real air combat, maintain air dominance as you can for long & even more than decades. Also beat next generation fighter aircraft like Stealth in real air combat.

[USAAIRPOWER]

King of The Sky:(Generation)

(1) P-51 Mustang (1942-1949)

(2) F-86 Sabre (1949-1960)

(3) F-4 Phantom (1960-1976)

(4) F-15 Eagle (1976-2005)

All these fighter aircraft have proven a worthy, destroy over 100 enemy aircraft in war, bet their rival in real air combat, air dominance, & had been crown King of the sky. F-15 Eagle was the only fighter aircraft never shot down by another fighter aircraft in real air combat. F-15 Eagle pass it's crown to F-22 Raptor to become next King of The Sky.

[om3ga123]

When did the F-4 and F-15 ever face off against a superpower. Attributing dominance to the fact that all they have done is kill pilots from banana republics is not so honorable. The planes aren't good because they're better machines than what the russians have, its because they have better pilots than the armies they have faced.

[USAAIRPOWER]

Russian Fighter pilot are weaker than USA & India pilot. USA Fight pilot flying F-86 Sabre shot down a lot Russian, Chinese, & North Korean Fighter pilot flying Mig-15 Fagot. Don't mess with F-15 & F-4 because they will knock you out of the sky. F-15 is the King of The Sky.

[om3ga123]

I'm sorry what grade are you in? (if you're American) You write like you are 12. US pilots have never fought against Russian pilots. Or please, by all means, remind me which war the Americans and Russians fought against each other.

[USAAIRPOWER]

I'm America by the way your not fucking 23 years old. First of all US pilot did fought against Russian pilots during Korean War. Duh! America pilot were flying F-86 Sabre while Russia fly Mig-15 Fagot.

[ataramprat]

The Korean War, moron. It is no secret on either side that RUSSIAN pilots flew in North Korean Migs. The North did not have many good pilots. Russian pilots flew for their side. And we kicked their asses.

[gomsc011]

In a first time only. But the Russian pilots returns to home,and after that MiG fighters flew by Koran and Chinese pilots. And Russians are more better than Koreans, and they have good scores. Yevgeny Pepelaev shot down 23 US fighters,in a first time of korea war. And after that he go back to USSR and replaced by a Korean rookie. Russian pilots in the kora war was very godd,but the koreans are not. Thats the reason why USA could win the kora war in air.

[kibabiba]

>>And we kicked their asses

kill:loss ratio for the F-86 was 1.8:1 overall, and likely 1.3:1 against MiGs flown by Soviet pilots. It's not ass kicking, it's normal score

[USAAIRPOWER]

Su-35 may carry more missiles than F-22. Well guess what it doesn't matter. F-16 carry less missiles than F-15. F-16 manage to beat F-15 at Red Flag. Number of Missiles doesn't matter. F-22 Raptor is going be next King of the Sky & Air dominance on every country. Russia Su-27, Su-30, & Su-35 never seeing in air combat, never destroyed over 100, & beat rival in real air combat. You can't called your self the best & powerful fighter aircraft in the world including King of the sky & Air Dominance.

[USAAIRPOWER]

F-22 Raptor can dodge Su-35 missiles like AA-12 Adder. Su-35 tried to track F-22 Raptor with heat seeking missiles like AA-11 Archer is going be worthless. There is one main reason why F-22 Raptor had a thin covering afterburner to prevent any heat seeking missiles from track it. Su-35 doesn't stand a chance against F-22 Raptor in real air combat. F-22 Raptor could beat Su-35 by firing AIM-9X. Flares & Chaff are going be useless. We study about AA-11 Archer thanks to former East Germany Mig-29.

[USAAIRPOWER]

Su-35 Super Flanker may be bigger than F-22 Raptor but guess what size doesn't matter. A little guy could out smart a big guy or stronger than him. Do not underestimated F-22 Raptor in real air combat. Su-35 only could beat F-22 in NATO War game exercises or Pacific Vision only because F-22 Raptor doesn't show it's true performance, radar, & everything. Just like during Red Flag, IAF Su-30MKI doesn't show everything. You mess F-22 in real air combat & he will knock you out of the sky.

[USAAIRPOWER]

Your wrong ricjan33. F-22 Raptor radar APG-77 is way far powerful than Irbis-E. F-22 Raptor radar could track multiple targets & also track enemy aircraft from 200-240 km. Su-35 IRBIS-E could track one target at a time & also track enemy aircraft from 200 km. IRBIS-E can't track Stealth Aircraft. F-22 Raptor stealth is very stealthiest. F-22 used new form of Stealth called Planform Alignment it cover by Plasma to put F-22 invisible to radar & inferred. F-22 Raptor is Superior than Su-35.

[lolf08]

Is that Yegevny Frolov?Sukhoi test pilot as stated in wikipedia?

[FeelFree3]

The description said the Su35 radar is more powerful than F-22. I doubt it the Su35 radar is not even AESA radar, the russian should put AESA radar in their fighters if they want to sell more of them.

[ExhibitMan]

F-22 has never been near dogfights'. Remeber that they cancelled production of raptors one year ago. The tremendous cost this airplane have are staggering. Therefore, it's a risk of using this aircraft in places like Iraq and afghanistan or any place around the world. There're currently 187 active Raptors out there and it appears that DoD has no financial support to continue to elaborate this aircraft. That's why Su-35 is better and much more cheaper in many ways

[chrslbrt]

I have respect for Russian aircraft, in fact, the Su-35BM is one of my favorites, but I have to say if it were my life in stake, I'd take the stealth aircraft. And I hate to break it to you guys, but the F-22's frontal RCS is about "0.00016m2", not .001. I might put my money on the Su-35BM in the dogfight, but I'd take the raptor anywhere else. Just my 2 cents.

[ete0]

Guys, objectively Su-35 concedes F-22 on many parameters. And surpasses only in range of flight, to the weapon and a maneuverability. Perhaps, our plane also can be opponent F-22, but eventually compare these machines incorrectly. The raptor is 5 generation, instead of modernized 4. But at present Su-35 strongly keeps 2 place among fighters.

[UncivilizedMan]

Su-35 BM is a superb machine, no doubt about that... however, it is no match to the raptor which is a 5th generation fighter 'cause that machine is labelled by sukhoi as a 4++ aeroplane... i like russian airplanes but we have to admit that the raptor has to that date, no rival... it may change with the arrival of the pak-fa, but...

[matamoros77]

fuck craptor watch the video f 22 high flying enron ,craptor is shit

[N1cholas240]

@matamoros77 SUck-35.

[matamoros77]

@N1cholas240 youre just jealous stupid fuck hahaha, go suck your usa masters dick cocksucker, canadian fuck go bury yourself with your cancelled arrow pos fighter dicksucker

[N1cholas240]

@matamoros77 HAHAHAHA dont be pissed off that i made you look bad.

[Simbirsk2130]

If Raptor is operating over a region where Russian longtidunal radars are stationed, then the Su 27BM won't even need its radar. It will be just guided from ground. Also, you forget about the IRST, which can detect the Raptor from a range of about 80km(thats the distance from which the IRST on the original Su 27 could detect MiG 21)

[sukhoisown]

I disagree with you. The BM can dodge the F22s BVRAAM missiles. Then move in close and take the KILL!

[f38stingray]

I like the Su-35 as much as anyone else, but the truth about the F-22 is that it lives up to all the hype they've given it. The flipside is that the F-22 is so good at longer range engagements that it's not very interesting as a plane.

[matamoros77]

@UncivilizedMan news for you pak fa is here to stay and it can eat craptors for breakfast , craptor is just overrated over propaganda piece of shit hahah

[JuanDeSoCal]

the most interesting part of this clip was the brief glimpse of the avionics.

[candid37]

mm.. at the end there is another song. IDK who is author :)

[candid37]

song is by russian metal band "Ария" ("Ariya")

[Su35MultiroleFighter]

I love that camo color!!

[fabbred85]

os russos sao foda msm!!!

[darkmaster010]

i love this vid! whats the song you used? AWESOME. 5/5

[DINDRAGON]

For an upgraded version of the aircraft capable of performing "super cobras" that video is lame. Seeing the F-22A in flight, I realised that is quite a competition for the Flankers in acrobatics. I certainly hope that Sukhoi will REALLY impress us again with NEW demonstrations off the Su-35BM, showing the true potential of this baby instead of showing that it can actually fly (like if there was ant dought).

[Hawkwood777]

That video was filmed when the BM made its maiden flight.

This plane will be vastley better then the normal flankers and the others like the "normal" SU 35.

[Spartan9567]

this video was performed on a maiden flight and is you look at extreme manueverability demo's the F-22 is lame compared to the new Migs and Sukhoi's

[2129261184]

This was the first flight video, you don´t perform aerobatic maneuvers what-so-ever before you know the machine limits and capabilities.

First testing and then performing.

[joaofga123]

su-35bm num é só single seat?

[gio31brasil]

bom demais,pau no cu dos americanos!!!!

[JulyMirage]

disse tudo Gio! =P

[gio31brasil]

eheh valeu!!!

[JulyMirage]

Meu Deus! Que caça mais LINDO!

Com certeza a FAB tem que adiquirir vários desses!

Muuito bom o vídeo! ;D