The supreme court has 4 justness that dont seem to understand the bill of rights at any one time. It is the congress fault they have approved these people to the supreme court judge. The congress need to ask these people that are potential president appointees, how they understand each amendment of bill of rights and what it mean. Next if they believe in bill of rights more importantly if they believe in constitution, before congress confirms them to the bench.
The syllabus of the majority opinion, only three pages, is very clear; no legal translation is necessary. Among the other dozens of pages are historic notes and modern applications and pragmatic consequences of the ruling.
Scalia's questions at the start of the oral arguments en banc on 18 March 2008 leads you directly to the points that are upheld in the majority opinion.
This affirms my belief that the Founders were wise and not just smart.
if you're talking about USA PATRIOT act, i don't agree with that, but i don't belive this liberal notion that "bush hates the const. VOTE US WE'LL Fix IT!"
hooray!
cassidy99ful 2 years ago
The supreme court has 4 justness that dont seem to understand the bill of rights at any one time. It is the congress fault they have approved these people to the supreme court judge. The congress need to ask these people that are potential president appointees, how they understand each amendment of bill of rights and what it mean. Next if they believe in bill of rights more importantly if they believe in constitution, before congress confirms them to the bench.
samatention 2 years ago
This ruling is not a great victory...
aka the majority opinion stating that: restrictions on "dangerous and unusual" weapons...
What does this mean? It means the ruling changed NOTHING! They can still pass bans on "Assault weapons" and concealed carry, etc.
AK49Gunner 3 years ago
the victory is in the fact that liberals cannot deny that the second amendment is an individual right - not restricted to the "militia"
pushups2345 2 years ago
The syllabus of the majority opinion, only three pages, is very clear; no legal translation is necessary. Among the other dozens of pages are historic notes and modern applications and pragmatic consequences of the ruling.
Scalia's questions at the start of the oral arguments en banc on 18 March 2008 leads you directly to the points that are upheld in the majority opinion.
This affirms my belief that the Founders were wise and not just smart.
USNARox2008 3 years ago
the founding fathers were more than wise, they were brilliant.
Reaganwannabe 3 years ago
I'm referring to the FISA compromise passed today.
moccosinbite 3 years ago
haven't got to that yet.
Reaganwannabe 3 years ago
To bad that you do not care as deeply about the fourth.
moccosinbite 3 years ago
if you're talking about USA PATRIOT act, i don't agree with that, but i don't belive this liberal notion that "bush hates the const. VOTE US WE'LL Fix IT!"
Reaganwannabe 3 years ago