What would the human right people say if the UN peacekeepers adopt a robust approaches against the rebel to protect the civilians? Would it become another violation of the so-called "sound human right connotation?
TheAndrew : i totally agree, their peacekeeping missions are a giant waste of money, and the whole institution is run by haggling do-nothings who postulate on everything until eventually everybody dies.
The UN should be torn down and replaced with a Starbucks. What conflict has the UN prevented? None. In the Middle East, the Arab armies drove around them to attack Israel. They couldn't stop the genocide in Rwanda either, or in the Balkans, or anywhere on the planet. What does the UN stand for? -Usually Nothing
good report. I'd have to say there needs to be some way charge for being in the un and on he sercuriy council. you take that money and take it to support these missions. The congo will always be a problem though.
The UN is an essential part of the modern world and I think its a great organization, but its system of peace-keeping is an out-dated and ineffective system of defensive action made with an insufficient amount of troops, equipment, and funding, it should take on a much more agressive strategy, and I think there should be a mandatory amount of troops, supplies, and funding that must be supplied to the UN by the permanent members Security Council
its not so much the country and the government of the country, but the corruption within in the country. We need the UN, or else the US would have to be the UN. And we cant help everyone.
the real reason is that we dont want our white premium humans to die for africans, we ll give you some money for our good conscience but dont ask us for some real commitment! with the insane amounts we ve spent on 4th and 5th generation jetfighters we could have pacified the whole kongo easily - not even by force but by civil development help
forget the UN, confront your own fellow citizens and governments about their inaction
UN Forces have so many rules to abide by it's unbelievable. Some rules which make it completely impossible for them to do what's asked of them. How can the UN work when human rights, lawyers and politicians make it ridiculous. It's not the UN it's the people who make the rules the UN abide by which make the UN unable to carry out it's role.
well if obama can fix our country we can actually have a big impact on the UN... look at his stupid beer parties and programs on this site: whoopsamerica very funny
it's not the UN fault is those who do not "support" the mission full hearted (spelled right?). There needs to be less trouble about getting troops and gear in, and put more effort in from bigger nation.
who will video and post the kick off of the petition drive to turn the U.N. headquarters into a veterans shelter.Many are waiting to sign the historic document.
The UN is not a peace keeping force what so ever. All they do is sit at their desks and think up stupid things the Democrats want them to make true, which are not. "Climate Change" is one of their biggest falsehoods.
the UN was made for what the one world government will be stationed with, they give vaccines that have killed babies of pregrant women and have infected vaccines with aids to reduce third world populations. there in africa for steralzation
the problem with the un is there is too much politics. its verrry complicated stuff but most of the time its just too much politics that put restrants on some things sometiems its not the un's fault but the fact still remains
What would the human right people say if the UN peacekeepers adopt a robust approaches against the rebel to protect the civilians? Would it become another violation of the so-called "sound human right connotation?
pvorasin 1 year ago
"UN Peacekeepers can use force in order to protect people" than why didn't those useless buggers do that in Rwanda?! Or in Bosnia?!
nickhodgesuk 1 year ago
TheAndrew : i totally agree, their peacekeeping missions are a giant waste of money, and the whole institution is run by haggling do-nothings who postulate on everything until eventually everybody dies.
MzShorthand 2 years ago
The UN should be torn down and replaced with a Starbucks. What conflict has the UN prevented? None. In the Middle East, the Arab armies drove around them to attack Israel. They couldn't stop the genocide in Rwanda either, or in the Balkans, or anywhere on the planet. What does the UN stand for? -Usually Nothing
TheAndrew668 2 years ago
good report. I'd have to say there needs to be some way charge for being in the un and on he sercuriy council. you take that money and take it to support these missions. The congo will always be a problem though.
a7241982 2 years ago
If every country with a military gave a fixed percentage of its forces to the UN, this organization wouldn't be so useless.
mostliberal 2 years ago 7
The UN is an essential part of the modern world and I think its a great organization, but its system of peace-keeping is an out-dated and ineffective system of defensive action made with an insufficient amount of troops, equipment, and funding, it should take on a much more agressive strategy, and I think there should be a mandatory amount of troops, supplies, and funding that must be supplied to the UN by the permanent members Security Council
GuntherZielke 2 years ago
Why do they have ak's with no clipp?
Ekiepfoo 2 years ago
It would be a first!
SparklestheClown 2 years ago
so? people are poor in america! lets fix our own problems instead of other country's problems.
FalloutOfMe 2 years ago
whoa whoa the U N is not just Americans its called the united nations 192 nations at the moment
tehallanaz 2 years ago 4
people here are facing genocide. HUGE difference.
paintdataint 2 years ago
@FalloutOfMe
Why? What makes your problems more important?
TheSnowEater 1 year ago
If every country minded their own business, maybe we don't need a U.N., just a thought.
Brashne01 2 years ago
its not so much the country and the government of the country, but the corruption within in the country. We need the UN, or else the US would have to be the UN. And we cant help everyone.
jsantiago2010 2 years ago
Just a thought,if every country minded their own business,we would need bigger bombs.
OBAMASTINIAN 2 years ago
the real reason is that we dont want our white premium humans to die for africans, we ll give you some money for our good conscience but dont ask us for some real commitment! with the insane amounts we ve spent on 4th and 5th generation jetfighters we could have pacified the whole kongo easily - not even by force but by civil development help
forget the UN, confront your own fellow citizens and governments about their inaction
random0815 2 years ago
with UN there is more wars then there was before it was created
heyzues30 2 years ago
UN Forces have so many rules to abide by it's unbelievable. Some rules which make it completely impossible for them to do what's asked of them. How can the UN work when human rights, lawyers and politicians make it ridiculous. It's not the UN it's the people who make the rules the UN abide by which make the UN unable to carry out it's role.
Alaskinmafia 2 years ago
well if obama can fix our country we can actually have a big impact on the UN... look at his stupid beer parties and programs on this site: whoopsamerica very funny
hellorules2 2 years ago
it's not the UN fault is those who do not "support" the mission full hearted (spelled right?). There needs to be less trouble about getting troops and gear in, and put more effort in from bigger nation.
whiteguy12340 2 years ago
who will video and post the kick off of the petition drive to turn the U.N. headquarters into a veterans shelter.Many are waiting to sign the historic document.
Fockersnextdoor 2 years ago
The UN is not a peace keeping force what so ever. All they do is sit at their desks and think up stupid things the Democrats want them to make true, which are not. "Climate Change" is one of their biggest falsehoods.
TheNewVideo 2 years ago
the UN was made for what the one world government will be stationed with, they give vaccines that have killed babies of pregrant women and have infected vaccines with aids to reduce third world populations. there in africa for steralzation
SupaManCA 2 years ago
Excuses Excuses
"Not enough translators"?"Not enough intelligence"?
u only need one or two
u dont need intellegence to kill attacking forces
GnoixGenp 2 years ago
the UN has been a useless piece of garbage after the korean war.
opinion56 2 years ago 2
it's better than if there were none UN peace keepers at all...
katheiss 2 years ago
That sign language gorilla from the movie "Congo" has the answers. Where's that b*tch when you need her?!
BinkieMcFartnuggets 2 years ago
the problem with the un is there is too much politics. its verrry complicated stuff but most of the time its just too much politics that put restrants on some things sometiems its not the un's fault but the fact still remains
skittlesareyum48 2 years ago
I hope you don't know what you're talking about.
Eddyking5 2 years ago
theres no clips in da guns
bord2death1 2 years ago
before we judge them..
LETS ASK OURSELVES 1st.....
did we ever participated to them??
have we done anything to show our support their will and hope for peace?
do we even HAVE THE RIGHT TO post a critic when all we have done is watch their video??
MAN it's our turn now to show that we are not just people masters of talking..
lets act on our own even in little ways...
not on purpose but as A NATURAL WAY OF SHOWING THE GOODNESS IN OUR HEARTS....
PEACE MEN....
loqueromelvin 2 years ago
Can the UN Keep the Peace?
Can the UN do ANYTHING?
Of course not...
barklikeamonkey 2 years ago
What has the UN ever done to effectively keep ANY peace ANYWHERE just a few people to look like they are doing something. Disgusting
lenny380 2 years ago
Does a bear shit in the public restroom?
electric789 2 years ago
thy dot even pun magazines in the rifle!!
what this is a kind of a joke??
nisimgarame123 2 years ago
I bet nothing will change because the elites wants to depopulate the planet.
MrProPoker 2 years ago
give the UN soldiers stick to hold. They can't even fire back. What the point with carrying guns?
Quy4life 2 years ago
What your saying is rediculous. The UN is the same as any army, if their being fired on the OIC can give ordwrs to return fire.
0penuriis 2 years ago
would any one dumb enough to fire a UN? hahaha
Quy4life 2 years ago
learn to type
MotownMoleman 2 years ago
NEVER! If you don't want or can't protect yourself why other people be do it?
alexei3333 2 years ago
Those people looked real safe behind razor-wire!
The U.N. is great in Africa......Not so great if they Come to AMERICA!
sikovit 2 years ago
first :-)
scott265scott 2 years ago
Peace the Keep UN The Can
Narniasten1304 2 years ago
Keep the can the UN
spungii117 2 years ago