Added: 3 years ago
From: mlbgecko
Views: 1,166
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Should have kept Shea and remodled it. The Mets have an owner who is more in love with the Brooklyn Dodgers than he is with the Mets history so he had to build a stadium Like Ebbits Field even named it Citi Field. Don't care much for the Wilpons. If Doubleday would have kept the team I think Shea would still be standing. Not the same maybe Citi is nicer but it doesnot seem like home.

  • Was never there, sucks though The Aud was still standing here until about the last week in may, just a big open lot now.

  • A terrible tragedy. And all so corporate fat cats can have more luxury boxes and they can suck more money out of the rest of us. Equally outrageous is that the taxpayers who built the new stadium don't get any recognition and they're going to name it after a corrupt and ruthless bank. Disgraceful.

  • Do they rename the 7 Train Stop? How about the WTC?

  • the 7 train stop is Mets-Willets Point but WTC is still WTC

  • Well it was better,but not a lot better,anyways shea remodeled would have been just fine

  • Shea Stadium should have been remodeled!! not destroyed!!they could have done the same thing that Kauffman Stadium is doing.Example:

    New seats,color green is fine with me

    Extend more seats

    Take out the bleachers and turn it into normal seats

    HD Scoreboard

    etc...

    Like U.S. Cellular Field did

    It would have cost MUCH LESS

    And im not critizicing Citi Field,i must admit it it looks great,but it wasnt necessary that new stadium specially at this time that the economy is BAD

    p.s. phillysuk

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more