Overunity device is realy work man , back here in indonesian country has been sales the device can produce 1 KW - 5 KW , it realy work mate , your devices just need big flywell to run smoothly
no need trying to prove a point by useing improper tools. if your going to try and use a motor and alt/gen, you are forgetting thats motors are only around 75%-90% efficent, and alts/gens are everywhere from 40% to90% efficent, thus just to break even it needs to be 334% to 124% OU. plus you are not useing the right tools. should be useing an oscilloscope, (same with your jeal thief). but since this is a mechanical OU, then you need to show lbf/min or HP.
@DougRH52 proves? I would guess, like most of the OU devices out, once he finaly built it and found out that it did not work as an OU, so they 1, lie about it, 2. give out a bounch of nonsensical data to confuse and "prove it", 3. only shows data that look good even tho meaningless( volts in and volts out) 4. throwing in science terms haveing nothing to do with whats going on (centrifugal fource).
basicly perpetuate a myth for views, money, selfworth. dont get me wrong, -cont-
dont get me wrong, I do believe something is out there waiting to be discoveried, but it will not as long as all the back yard inventors waste time one false hopes and lies. plus I liked this one. completely new idea, until i tried it, and then read how he tried to explain it... centrifugal fources? has nothing to do with the efficancy of a planetary gear train. but at least he came up with something new not just a copy of the fakes, and built it. just went about it wrong
Check out some of the other references I've posted here. Their still ARE things that we don't know about this and their are some 'Real deals' that (seemingly) violate our current understanding about electromagnetics.
These are new devolopments in this field that shows that we have more singifcant things to learn abou them yet. Some of them that will really increase our energy efficiency and greatly reduce poluttion on our world that we have poisened as is DYING off VERY rapidly!
@DougRH52 yeah, my main point, as is the group i am head of, is that (like Einstein & Tesla believed) anything is possible. that right now there is no OU, Magnet motor, PMM, "free energy" device that works. that working on them is not only fun but leads to development of better efficancy, if ppl would stop lieing to thierselves and other. my biggiest issue is the lies/scams that get so many to give up and not try thier own ideas.. new ideas and not the scams. -cont-
I don't think that most such individuals are trying to cover such things up. As is quite apparent on here, most are trying desperately to 'get it out there' & to get some recognition, support & assistance. If one isn't in or came from 'academia', it's really hard to get anyone to take one seriously. Often because they don't have any real access needed to make things go even if they really have somethings legit.
Only about 2% ~ 3% US patents ever make it into the market place.
@DougRH52 i just use the term "cover-up" to turn the phrase. but you said it your self to get it out there and some recognition...but all that does it hurt the "search" that is exactly why no one takes it seriusly. because as of today it does not work. beside it realy hurts them. think about it, lets say he does discover anything, not even OU just something, all anyone will see is this and how they handled it. you do know that most patents are worthless/outdated, and have no market.
By virtue of the very fact that they aren't 'broadcasting it' depserately tyring to get it out there and 'prove' it to fo.ks before it is ready, is indicative of it being the real thing. Also they obviously have more solid business expertice behind them.
Many like me need is to be the CTO (Chief Technical Officer) and have a proven, motivated and capable CEO to make it go.
Somewhat paradoxically, in our current economic climate, which is now dead as we have 'bankrupt' the Eco system: Scientists predicting that 1/2 ~ 2/3 species will be extinct before the end of THIS century. Hence TOTAL collapse of the food chain.
Is that it isn't going to be significant unless it IS a successful profitable product. After that, then it can permeate widely.
These can & often do start from serious Academic R&D
Their are some (very) few exceptions to these routes.
@DougRH52 not going to go off subject. but as being a patent holder, and doing my research not from what other "thinks" and being a total geek, i go thru patents for the fun of it. it the best way to figure out how something works. and staying on subject my point still stands, it does not work any of them as of yet. lieing about result does nothing but hurt the search, and the best way to help is just be truthful and post facts, and KISS.
Patents GREAT R&D tools! Most comprehensive source of info in single locations.
No sense expending & wasting resources if already patented. Thus part of START of any R&D.
Have to know of & site all relevant existing (patented) 'prior art' when applying.
A Back Yard inventor, possibly with virtually no resources, recognition nor credibility; Honesty & Integrity are vital & crucial. This applies to everything!
Patents GREAT R&D tools! Most comprehensive source of info in single locations.
No sense expending & wasting resources if already patented. Thus part of START of any R&D.
Have to know of & site all relevant existing (patented) 'prior art' when applying
A Back Yard inventor, possibly with virtually no resources, recognition nor credibility; Honesty & Integrity are vital & crucial. This applies to everything!
besides if ppl were not so dead set on just trying to prove that they are not wrong (that its already here and being covered up) that instead of seeing what they got (something that may lead to better efficancy) that they "lie" just for "proof" or money. thats why i say the biggest cover-up is by the "free energy" nuts, and thus doing more harm then good. but like i said at first i realy liked this one. until he started down the wrong road . but still at least it was new.
@DougRH52 the thing is. that when it comes to those devices, they only "seem to violate" understanding of those with only so much knowledge on it. thats why its so important to messure the in and out in Watts per hour, (1.5VDC .3Amps for 1 hr = 0.45 Watts for 60 Min) with a output that was pulsed for the same amount of time like a joule thief (3.2VDC .3Amps but only a total time 1/10 of input for 0.96Watts for 6 Min)... great things when used for LED's and could lead to better efficancy.
'Mathematics is the language with which God hath wrought the Universe'
Many that have an idea, work things through and KNOW intuitively that they are right & then set out to prove it theoretically, but lack the (advanced) language of math to prove the theory. Nor have the resources to prove it physically.
I can easily get 20+ % gain in ALL Otto engine efficiencies. Full Physics prof said was impossible Proved it with very crude experiment far from optimal with things I had + ~ $25
In spite of 'BIG' Science & Business, that their were still more 'basic / fundamental', significant and even process inventions patented by private individuals than by the large, very well funded organizations with massive amounts of money, personnel & other resources over the last century. Considering the very deep, detailed delving Science and technology, that's really saying something!
If you're 1 step ahead of the rest, you're a genius. If 2 steps ahead, they call you 'crazy'
Ignore 'net marketing BS & watch all the video Shows the R&D & results of this (seemingly) 'Over Unity' generator with decades of R&D by numerous teams of scientists, engineers, techs & trades globally. Once started by an external motor, it is then no longer driven by any external force or power, yet continues producing electric power and heat (until it needs repairs). Over Unity or using forces not yet understood? The latter I think.
if it truely is OU then ie. a 1lb weight pulling down on the lets say 1ft pully at 10 rpms from gravity, will raise the 1lb weight up on a 1 ft pully on the out put at if ratio is 1-5 at 50 rpm, thus there is your proof, input of 31.4 ft·lbf/min (.09515 HP) output of 157 ft·lbf/min (.47575 HP) thus a 500% OU. and since i just so happen to have a few planetary gear Xmsn (for scooters) laying around, i could prove this for you and everyone else.
you went about this all wrong...as the head of a group of ppl trying to come up with the new alt energy source, that does play around with over unity ideas, the first rule is K.I.S.S., and never make fusle claims. if your tranmission is truely OU, all it would take is one simple test. take your Xmsn and add to pullys the same size to the input and output, show the ip &op ratio ie, 1-5 ration, then tie string to both sides, add set wieght to both ends, then there is your proof. cont.
I'm not sure why you would want a Sun and Planetary gear system that does not increase torque when it reduces speed? This is one of the things looked for when reducing speed by mechanical means. This as you quite likely know is contrary to the usual operation of such gear sets, though what you are saying may very well be possible.
Not to mention the bedframe ($12) and the two chairs you'll be needing for firewood this winter as you've not worked to make a living for the last 6 months while working on this project... Seriously... you've not provide (in the video) enough information to show any type of increase in (POWER). Take a white board and pen to show us what exactly you are so excited about?? maxwell
an electric field is a source of energy. if the electric field is destroyed the source of energy is no longer available. if an electric field induce on its own an electric field in a secondary material that secondary field can then dissipate trough its own potential difference. the source field will automatically restore the secondary field when work is being done. negentropy is cased by fields influencing external mass. energy and fields are made from a change geometry.
@coldarc By 'Electric Filed' are you referring to the 'MAGNETIC' forces generated? Such things are spoken of as 'Electro-Magnetic'' energy for good reason. ,
The following is not put forth as being 'definitive facts', but rather more of being some information and a postulation to encourage discussion and hopefully an increase in knowledge:
All matter is Energy. So what is the (universal) nature of such (ElectroMangetic) Energy? It is ALL 'vibrations' is it not? But of what?
@DougRH52 no. the electric field will like a magnetic field align the structure inside some materials. in this case voltage is a difference between two material were the field influence is stronger on one plate than on the other, but what create the energy across the potential difference is the field. the materials it influences freely organize secondary field with no observable source of energy. the problem with magnetism is to make it do the same thing.
@coldarc Losing track here. Most certainly in a generator. In a motor, it is the magnetic fields induced by the electrical windings that produce the 'power output' to do work with, but your assertion still holds true.
@DougRH52 The referred to 'Power output' by induced magnetic flux refers to a motor not a generator. But the ease of direct manipulation of the electricity rather than magnetic field still applicable.
But magnetic flux interaction, creation and control with electricity in motors and generators is well understood & widely documented. But I don't think that we know and understand everything about these yet.
Please view entire Video at TopMagneticGenerator Com + # of installations.
@coldarc 'Refresher' questions: Transformers: It's MAGNETIC FLUX field between 2 windings that induces electrical power in the output. Their is no actual, literal 'electrical field' outside actual conductors? It's only induced magnetic flux fields isn't it?
'Over wire' (Inductive?) Ammeter probes actually measure Magnetic Flux don't they? Can it know the current without knowing the voltage? Will the Magnetic Flux density be the same with the same Current but different Voltages? I think not.
@DougRH52 transformers produce a electric field in the output winding when the output winding is open loop. when the circuit become closed the electric field decrease in strength in proportion with the increase in strength of the magnetic field.
the ammeter probe currents only and says nothing about the power.
the flux density of the magnetic field can be the same with same current and different voltages in some cases. 5v 1 amp 5 ohms and 10v 1 amp 10 ohms have same flux density.
electric generator produce currents by the potential difference in amplitude between magnetic fields of opposite directions influencing a coil. its the decrease in amplitude alongside its resistance within a coil under load that act as currents. the potential difference is created by a difference in strenght of the magnetic field influencing the coil between time intervals. the electric field should be detectable when the coil is open loop.
its the induced field when spinning the rotor that slows the rotor inside a generator and not the potential difference created in the coil. that means the mechanical work is only rotating against the induced field and does not provide any work on the output by doing so. what creates the magnetic drag does not provide a single watt of power to the output as the potential difference have already taken place when the circuit is open loop.
You are incorrect. The increase in voltage means nothing to the amps. You must see what the pulse wave looks like to measure the current. This is not over-unity if measured correctly. No measure of frequency, not true-RMS...this is just hooking motors together and playing with meters.
Two dyno test were made by other persons(not me) before this video and three more dyno test after this video. Still no negative report from different engineers, technician and big companies who spent time and money. So, this groups did not measured it correctly and they are also incorrect as well. This energy companies should not continue their product development because you(smart people) by just watching this video and without any research and experiment, already know this is not over-unity.
That means nothing. I have yet to see any actual empirical data. I did the same tests with real companies and found that this design loses about 40% of its power.
I am happy it did not work because I only authorized two companies and they already paid me money, the device will be available in market soon. You said 40% lost of power (reduce in speed and torque), a planetary design capable of reducing speed and torque at same time, that is a new invention. Planetary gear power = torque x speed can be calculated mathematically, math skeptics calculated my design as equal in power input and output. Now they have to change the formula because of that 40% lost.
The simplest way to load an electric motor is a resistor or some light bulbs. Light bulbs are nice for the common Joe but I like to know how many volts and amps are there or how many watts are available. running a motor unloaded proves very little.
throw your cheap ass Harbor Freight meters in the dumpster and get a FLUKE 87, which measures TRUE RMS, instead of AVERAGE volts and current. Then you will see the laws of physics do NOT ALLOW OVERUNITY. I dont know if you are too uneducated to understand the difference, or if you are intentionally scamming people?
overunitydotcom is an intelligence gathering operation. POYN99, WilbyInebriated, ION, MileHigh, IST, Grumpy Sigma16, Ramset and Harti just to name a few are gathering information of people and suppressing information.
Overunityresearchdotcom is another operation run by POYNT99. They try and get you to disclose information so you can't patent for 1 year. If you disclose real information they delete it and ban you. Boycott these web sites & copy this and re-post to warn others.
REAL Free energy technology exists!But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Get a REAL working magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
I don't see anything here to suggest overunity. Increase of voltage means a decrease in current. Not an increase in current. Also output motor was not under load. How is it drawing over 16A under no load conditions. You mentioned the DC generated is pulsed DC. You need an oscilloscope to properly measure it. Your meter cannot measure that accurately.
The basic of generator when you increase the rotation of the rotor, you increase both the voltage and current. The orange motor was the load, same load used in the other video(see double power transmission in series failure experiment) which caused overload. If there was a decrease in current, the double power transmission in series should work. Electric motors draw current even in no load condition.
@tubejhuncarl Thank you for the reply. Yes I agree voltage and current capability increase with rotation of a generator. However, the idling current and load current are different. Current draw increases and is proportional to load. The unloaded motor you indicated was drawing over 16A? That seems quite high for a motor not under load. Maybe I'm missing something here?
@valveman12 I don't see evidence for overunity either. If the output exceeds 100% of the input + energy consumed by the system, connecting the output to the input would mean that the device would be self sustaining. I look forward to seeing the demonstration.
From our latest experiment, the generator was under load or closed circuit even the orange motor had no load. Do this generator experiment and draft a schematic diagram and analyze. When you increase the speed of the generator under closed circuit, the torque required by the generator also increases... see the double power transmission experiment video
Calculate the output power with 100% rolling resistance or friction of the planetary gears with the reverse sun gear. The result will be no overunity, the output power equal to the input power (power=speed x torque). Now, according to physics, the rolling resistance or friction decreases during constant motion. This time, calculate again the output power with decreasing rolling friction down to zero rolling resistance. Use your knowledge in mathematics and you will be surprised!
Overunity device is realy work man , back here in indonesian country has been sales the device can produce 1 KW - 5 KW , it realy work mate , your devices just need big flywell to run smoothly
MrDuajuta 1 week ago
Awesome video of Overunity Demonstration.
But If you want more...
Go to Google and search for "Top Magnetic Generator" ...
Click the First Result (Skip the Ads)
john38294 2 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
★★★ If you want to get the Magnetic-Generator plans
★★ Just search Google for "Best Magnetic Generator"
★ Click the First result (Skip the Advertisements)
FlowersAll 4 months ago
Kids, this video is complete and utter bullshit. Stay in school.
smackbabie 4 months ago
I cant follow you because I cant see what was typed due to the colors :(
TheBrianCoats 5 months ago
part 3
no need trying to prove a point by useing improper tools. if your going to try and use a motor and alt/gen, you are forgetting thats motors are only around 75%-90% efficent, and alts/gens are everywhere from 40% to90% efficent, thus just to break even it needs to be 334% to 124% OU. plus you are not useing the right tools. should be useing an oscilloscope, (same with your jeal thief). but since this is a mechanical OU, then you need to show lbf/min or HP.
1crazyfocker 6 months ago
@1crazyfocker
The 'X factor' efficiency losses that aren't being taken into account is going to is certainly going to skew this.
This is a poor configuration to try and prove these assertions.
I'm not sure what if anythign this particualar demonstration proves?
DougRH52 5 months ago
@DougRH52 proves? I would guess, like most of the OU devices out, once he finaly built it and found out that it did not work as an OU, so they 1, lie about it, 2. give out a bounch of nonsensical data to confuse and "prove it", 3. only shows data that look good even tho meaningless( volts in and volts out) 4. throwing in science terms haveing nothing to do with whats going on (centrifugal fource).
basicly perpetuate a myth for views, money, selfworth. dont get me wrong, -cont-
1crazyfocker 5 months ago
@DougRH52 -cont-
dont get me wrong, I do believe something is out there waiting to be discoveried, but it will not as long as all the back yard inventors waste time one false hopes and lies. plus I liked this one. completely new idea, until i tried it, and then read how he tried to explain it... centrifugal fources? has nothing to do with the efficancy of a planetary gear train. but at least he came up with something new not just a copy of the fakes, and built it. just went about it wrong
1crazyfocker 5 months ago
@1crazyfocker
Check out some of the other references I've posted here. Their still ARE things that we don't know about this and their are some 'Real deals' that (seemingly) violate our current understanding about electromagnetics.
These are new devolopments in this field that shows that we have more singifcant things to learn abou them yet. Some of them that will really increase our energy efficiency and greatly reduce poluttion on our world that we have poisened as is DYING off VERY rapidly!
DougRH52 5 months ago
@DougRH52 yeah, my main point, as is the group i am head of, is that (like Einstein & Tesla believed) anything is possible. that right now there is no OU, Magnet motor, PMM, "free energy" device that works. that working on them is not only fun but leads to development of better efficancy, if ppl would stop lieing to thierselves and other. my biggiest issue is the lies/scams that get so many to give up and not try thier own ideas.. new ideas and not the scams. -cont-
1crazyfocker 5 months ago
@1crazyfocker
I don't think that most such individuals are trying to cover such things up. As is quite apparent on here, most are trying desperately to 'get it out there' & to get some recognition, support & assistance. If one isn't in or came from 'academia', it's really hard to get anyone to take one seriously. Often because they don't have any real access needed to make things go even if they really have somethings legit.
Only about 2% ~ 3% US patents ever make it into the market place.
DougRH52 5 months ago
@DougRH52 i just use the term "cover-up" to turn the phrase. but you said it your self to get it out there and some recognition...but all that does it hurt the "search" that is exactly why no one takes it seriusly. because as of today it does not work. beside it realy hurts them. think about it, lets say he does discover anything, not even OU just something, all anyone will see is this and how they handled it. you do know that most patents are worthless/outdated, and have no market.
1crazyfocker 5 months ago
@1crazyfocker
'Cover Up'
Agreed. One such US company quite the opposite.
Have some former TOP US Gov officials onboard.
By virtue of the very fact that they aren't 'broadcasting it' depserately tyring to get it out there and 'prove' it to fo.ks before it is ready, is indicative of it being the real thing. Also they obviously have more solid business expertice behind them.
Many like me need is to be the CTO (Chief Technical Officer) and have a proven, motivated and capable CEO to make it go.
DougRH52 5 months ago
@1crazyfocker
Somewhat paradoxically, in our current economic climate, which is now dead as we have 'bankrupt' the Eco system: Scientists predicting that 1/2 ~ 2/3 species will be extinct before the end of THIS century. Hence TOTAL collapse of the food chain.
Is that it isn't going to be significant unless it IS a successful profitable product. After that, then it can permeate widely.
These can & often do start from serious Academic R&D
Their are some (very) few exceptions to these routes.
DougRH52 5 months ago
@1crazyfocker - Re: Patents:
Often needed to get started.
But, LOTS of products ARE successful that are made by MANY different entities, often numerous global places. Though our world IS rapidly 'shrinking'.
Including most life & most if not ALL of humanity! So is going to bring all to a crashing catastrophic halt VERY soon. Already well underway.
Still a very big market out there and in almost all cases, no one corporate entity is going to be able to provide for and service the entire market.
DougRH52 5 months ago
@DougRH52 not going to go off subject. but as being a patent holder, and doing my research not from what other "thinks" and being a total geek, i go thru patents for the fun of it. it the best way to figure out how something works. and staying on subject my point still stands, it does not work any of them as of yet. lieing about result does nothing but hurt the search, and the best way to help is just be truthful and post facts, and KISS.
1crazyfocker 5 months ago
@1crazyfocker - Patents & Credibility
Patents GREAT R&D tools! Most comprehensive source of info in single locations.
No sense expending & wasting resources if already patented. Thus part of START of any R&D.
Have to know of & site all relevant existing (patented) 'prior art' when applying.
A Back Yard inventor, possibly with virtually no resources, recognition nor credibility; Honesty & Integrity are vital & crucial. This applies to everything!
Best designs often are KISS
Regards . DougRH
DougRH52 5 months ago
@1crazyfocker - Patents & Credibility
Patents GREAT R&D tools! Most comprehensive source of info in single locations.
No sense expending & wasting resources if already patented. Thus part of START of any R&D.
Have to know of & site all relevant existing (patented) 'prior art' when applying
A Back Yard inventor, possibly with virtually no resources, recognition nor credibility; Honesty & Integrity are vital & crucial. This applies to everything!
Best designs often are KISS
DougRH52 5 months ago
@DougRH52 -cont2-
besides if ppl were not so dead set on just trying to prove that they are not wrong (that its already here and being covered up) that instead of seeing what they got (something that may lead to better efficancy) that they "lie" just for "proof" or money. thats why i say the biggest cover-up is by the "free energy" nuts, and thus doing more harm then good. but like i said at first i realy liked this one. until he started down the wrong road . but still at least it was new.
1crazyfocker 5 months ago
@DougRH52 the thing is. that when it comes to those devices, they only "seem to violate" understanding of those with only so much knowledge on it. thats why its so important to messure the in and out in Watts per hour, (1.5VDC .3Amps for 1 hr = 0.45 Watts for 60 Min) with a output that was pulsed for the same amount of time like a joule thief (3.2VDC .3Amps but only a total time 1/10 of input for 0.96Watts for 6 Min)... great things when used for LED's and could lead to better efficancy.
1crazyfocker 5 months ago
@1crazyfocker
I hear ya.
It is an ill conceived experiment & apparatus for what he is trying to prove.
But hey, he's trying.
Very few scientists get everything correct right out of the blocks.
Edison tried over 2000+? filaments, (but definitely into the 4 figure range) before he got it right.
DougRH52 5 months ago
@DougRH52
'Mathematics is the language with which God hath wrought the Universe'
Many that have an idea, work things through and KNOW intuitively that they are right & then set out to prove it theoretically, but lack the (advanced) language of math to prove the theory. Nor have the resources to prove it physically.
I can easily get 20+ % gain in ALL Otto engine efficiencies. Full Physics prof said was impossible Proved it with very crude experiment far from optimal with things I had + ~ $25
DougRH52 5 months ago
@1crazyfocker
In spite of 'BIG' Science & Business, that their were still more 'basic / fundamental', significant and even process inventions patented by private individuals than by the large, very well funded organizations with massive amounts of money, personnel & other resources over the last century. Considering the very deep, detailed delving Science and technology, that's really saying something!
If you're 1 step ahead of the rest, you're a genius. If 2 steps ahead, they call you 'crazy'
DougRH52 5 months ago
@1crazyfocker
Magnets4energy . Izonate . Com - ?id=sale100
Ignore 'net marketing BS & watch all the video Shows the R&D & results of this (seemingly) 'Over Unity' generator with decades of R&D by numerous teams of scientists, engineers, techs & trades globally. Once started by an external motor, it is then no longer driven by any external force or power, yet continues producing electric power and heat (until it needs repairs). Over Unity or using forces not yet understood? The latter I think.
DougRH52 5 months ago
part 2
if it truely is OU then ie. a 1lb weight pulling down on the lets say 1ft pully at 10 rpms from gravity, will raise the 1lb weight up on a 1 ft pully on the out put at if ratio is 1-5 at 50 rpm, thus there is your proof, input of 31.4 ft·lbf/min (.09515 HP) output of 157 ft·lbf/min (.47575 HP) thus a 500% OU. and since i just so happen to have a few planetary gear Xmsn (for scooters) laying around, i could prove this for you and everyone else.
1crazyfocker 6 months ago
you went about this all wrong...as the head of a group of ppl trying to come up with the new alt energy source, that does play around with over unity ideas, the first rule is K.I.S.S., and never make fusle claims. if your tranmission is truely OU, all it would take is one simple test. take your Xmsn and add to pullys the same size to the input and output, show the ip &op ratio ie, 1-5 ration, then tie string to both sides, add set wieght to both ends, then there is your proof. cont.
1crazyfocker 6 months ago
if you go to high sku, you can learn he difference between amperage and rpm
baloneyjazz 6 months ago
I'm not sure why you would want a Sun and Planetary gear system that does not increase torque when it reduces speed? This is one of the things looked for when reducing speed by mechanical means. This as you quite likely know is contrary to the usual operation of such gear sets, though what you are saying may very well be possible.
DougRH52 6 months ago
Not to mention the bedframe ($12) and the two chairs you'll be needing for firewood this winter as you've not worked to make a living for the last 6 months while working on this project... Seriously... you've not provide (in the video) enough information to show any type of increase in (POWER). Take a white board and pen to show us what exactly you are so excited about?? maxwell
Moneymax3001 6 months ago
an electric field is a source of energy. if the electric field is destroyed the source of energy is no longer available. if an electric field induce on its own an electric field in a secondary material that secondary field can then dissipate trough its own potential difference. the source field will automatically restore the secondary field when work is being done. negentropy is cased by fields influencing external mass. energy and fields are made from a change geometry.
coldarc 8 months ago
@coldarc By 'Electric Filed' are you referring to the 'MAGNETIC' forces generated? Such things are spoken of as 'Electro-Magnetic'' energy for good reason. ,
The following is not put forth as being 'definitive facts', but rather more of being some information and a postulation to encourage discussion and hopefully an increase in knowledge:
All matter is Energy. So what is the (universal) nature of such (ElectroMangetic) Energy? It is ALL 'vibrations' is it not? But of what?
DougRH52 6 months ago
@DougRH52 no. the electric field will like a magnetic field align the structure inside some materials. in this case voltage is a difference between two material were the field influence is stronger on one plate than on the other, but what create the energy across the potential difference is the field. the materials it influences freely organize secondary field with no observable source of energy. the problem with magnetism is to make it do the same thing.
coldarc 6 months ago
@coldarc These short posts are limiting for such things.
'... , but what create the energy across the potential difference is the field'....
Which field are you refering to in this case? The magnetic flux fields or the elcetrical?
DougRH52 5 months ago
@DougRH52 both of them. its easier with a electric field because the energy can be extracted directly.
coldarc 5 months ago
@coldarc Losing track here. Most certainly in a generator. In a motor, it is the magnetic fields induced by the electrical windings that produce the 'power output' to do work with, but your assertion still holds true.
DougRH52 5 months ago
@DougRH52 The referred to 'Power output' by induced magnetic flux refers to a motor not a generator. But the ease of direct manipulation of the electricity rather than magnetic field still applicable.
But magnetic flux interaction, creation and control with electricity in motors and generators is well understood & widely documented. But I don't think that we know and understand everything about these yet.
Please view entire Video at TopMagneticGenerator Com + # of installations.
DougRH52 5 months ago
@coldarc 'Refresher' questions: Transformers: It's MAGNETIC FLUX field between 2 windings that induces electrical power in the output. Their is no actual, literal 'electrical field' outside actual conductors? It's only induced magnetic flux fields isn't it?
'Over wire' (Inductive?) Ammeter probes actually measure Magnetic Flux don't they? Can it know the current without knowing the voltage? Will the Magnetic Flux density be the same with the same Current but different Voltages? I think not.
DougRH52 5 months ago
@DougRH52 transformers produce a electric field in the output winding when the output winding is open loop. when the circuit become closed the electric field decrease in strength in proportion with the increase in strength of the magnetic field.
the ammeter probe currents only and says nothing about the power.
the flux density of the magnetic field can be the same with same current and different voltages in some cases. 5v 1 amp 5 ohms and 10v 1 amp 10 ohms have same flux density.
coldarc 5 months ago
@DougRH52 flux density is currents and not power.
coldarc 5 months ago
electric generator produce currents by the potential difference in amplitude between magnetic fields of opposite directions influencing a coil. its the decrease in amplitude alongside its resistance within a coil under load that act as currents. the potential difference is created by a difference in strenght of the magnetic field influencing the coil between time intervals. the electric field should be detectable when the coil is open loop.
coldarc 6 months ago
its the induced field when spinning the rotor that slows the rotor inside a generator and not the potential difference created in the coil. that means the mechanical work is only rotating against the induced field and does not provide any work on the output by doing so. what creates the magnetic drag does not provide a single watt of power to the output as the potential difference have already taken place when the circuit is open loop.
coldarc 6 months ago
You are incorrect. The increase in voltage means nothing to the amps. You must see what the pulse wave looks like to measure the current. This is not over-unity if measured correctly. No measure of frequency, not true-RMS...this is just hooking motors together and playing with meters.
rostit420 9 months ago
Two dyno test were made by other persons(not me) before this video and three more dyno test after this video. Still no negative report from different engineers, technician and big companies who spent time and money. So, this groups did not measured it correctly and they are also incorrect as well. This energy companies should not continue their product development because you(smart people) by just watching this video and without any research and experiment, already know this is not over-unity.
tubejhuncarl 9 months ago
@tubejhuncarl
That means nothing. I have yet to see any actual empirical data. I did the same tests with real companies and found that this design loses about 40% of its power.
rostit420 9 months ago
I am happy it did not work because I only authorized two companies and they already paid me money, the device will be available in market soon. You said 40% lost of power (reduce in speed and torque), a planetary design capable of reducing speed and torque at same time, that is a new invention. Planetary gear power = torque x speed can be calculated mathematically, math skeptics calculated my design as equal in power input and output. Now they have to change the formula because of that 40% lost.
tubejhuncarl 9 months ago
@tubejhuncarl it is unity, unity with the cosmic force ;) Well, one of the two. Or both of them when you get light.
conspiracyco 4 months ago 2
is it possible to sell this devise
mbaqader 9 months ago
The simplest way to load an electric motor is a resistor or some light bulbs. Light bulbs are nice for the common Joe but I like to know how many volts and amps are there or how many watts are available. running a motor unloaded proves very little.
Thanks for the demonstration.
SidneyBou 1 year ago
throw your cheap ass Harbor Freight meters in the dumpster and get a FLUKE 87, which measures TRUE RMS, instead of AVERAGE volts and current. Then you will see the laws of physics do NOT ALLOW OVERUNITY. I dont know if you are too uneducated to understand the difference, or if you are intentionally scamming people?
MrHobiecat 1 year ago
overunitydotcom is an intelligence gathering operation. POYN99, WilbyInebriated, ION, MileHigh, IST, Grumpy Sigma16, Ramset and Harti just to name a few are gathering information of people and suppressing information.
Overunityresearchdotcom is another operation run by POYNT99. They try and get you to disclose information so you can't patent for 1 year. If you disclose real information they delete it and ban you. Boycott these web sites & copy this and re-post to warn others.
OUTRUTH 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
REAL Free energy technology exists!But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Get a REAL working magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
affluenceclm 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything in their power to stop these
information. If you want a Free energy machine do a search in youtube for the LT MAGNET MOTOR , Join the
revolution!
cadentavaricegrtrj 1 year ago
I don't see anything here to suggest overunity. Increase of voltage means a decrease in current. Not an increase in current. Also output motor was not under load. How is it drawing over 16A under no load conditions. You mentioned the DC generated is pulsed DC. You need an oscilloscope to properly measure it. Your meter cannot measure that accurately.
valveman12 1 year ago
The basic of generator when you increase the rotation of the rotor, you increase both the voltage and current. The orange motor was the load, same load used in the other video(see double power transmission in series failure experiment) which caused overload. If there was a decrease in current, the double power transmission in series should work. Electric motors draw current even in no load condition.
tubejhuncarl 1 year ago
@tubejhuncarl Thank you for the reply. Yes I agree voltage and current capability increase with rotation of a generator. However, the idling current and load current are different. Current draw increases and is proportional to load. The unloaded motor you indicated was drawing over 16A? That seems quite high for a motor not under load. Maybe I'm missing something here?
valveman12 1 year ago
@valveman12 I don't see evidence for overunity either. If the output exceeds 100% of the input + energy consumed by the system, connecting the output to the input would mean that the device would be self sustaining. I look forward to seeing the demonstration.
Spoif 10 months ago
From our latest experiment, the generator was under load or closed circuit even the orange motor had no load. Do this generator experiment and draft a schematic diagram and analyze. When you increase the speed of the generator under closed circuit, the torque required by the generator also increases... see the double power transmission experiment video
tubejhuncarl 10 months ago
IQ Challenge..
Calculate the output power with 100% rolling resistance or friction of the planetary gears with the reverse sun gear. The result will be no overunity, the output power equal to the input power (power=speed x torque). Now, according to physics, the rolling resistance or friction decreases during constant motion. This time, calculate again the output power with decreasing rolling friction down to zero rolling resistance. Use your knowledge in mathematics and you will be surprised!
tubejhuncarl 10 months ago
Good work Carlos! I am so glad that you were able to complete this part of your project. Onwards and Upwards my friend! Blessings to you and yours.
mangput 1 year ago