You are afraid, you are angry. God does exist friends. God is all around you everyday. Do you love your family? If so, prove it. Is what you feel for a child, mother or father simply a series of chemical reactions in the brain? Love exist because we feel it, we experience it. Ask someone to put love in your hand or in a box and show it to you..not possible. If you love another human being, anyone...that feeling you have for them is God.
He's a math prof, not a physicist. He doesn't even know the physics he is using isn't the latest theory. He doesn't even seem to realize he is trying to prove something using theories that we've already improved upon (i.e. proved false).
His department should informally censor him for being an unprofessional goof and making his entire university look ridiculous.
"So, this proves that talking snakes exist? Awesome! Hey snakey, get over here and say hi to the camera." *Snake does nothing* "Come on, you're killing me here." *Nothing still* "Well, that proves it. That he's shy, but do you know what also is complete bullshit? The bible, it depicts talking snakes, witches, and unicorns. Look 'em up"
@neotropic9's description. Your opinion of nonsense does not matter to the truth of science. I havent even watched the vid, but it's a fact that a lot of high paid scientists have found strong evidence of Intel. design but aren't allowed to publish their finds. A creator exists, call it/him/her whatever you want, but it's common sense. THERMODYNAMICS STATE: NOTHING CAN COME FROM NOTHING. Therefor, something had to have always been, and it had to be intelligent. FACT. Not negotiable.
@xxFairestxx Call it God, call it "the source" call it "the unmoved mover," whatever you call it, there IS an intelligent creator. Religion is the system of trying to have a relationship with it. Saying there is no creator is COMPLETE and TOTAL nonsense. It shows a sheer lack of intelligence and common sense.
@Killerclownmeat Not true. Read my post better friend, the proof is the fact of a source. God, Allah, w/e you want to call it...the source of all life is a source of intelligent energy. Scientifically proven through common sense and deductive reasoning.
You can't prove God exists, but you also cannot disprove it, common sense says there is God, we cannot prove God existence, he will prove it to the whole world soon, but in meantime, we should stick to what Bible says
since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them.
true, common sense does say what has been made could not have come into existence just like that, before you ask me and what made God, you must know, God is eternal, always was
In the last century astrophysicists have discovered that the stars of Pleiades move in unison with each other, and are thus gravitationally bound. They have also discovered that the stars of Orion are free agents that are not gravitationally bound. 3,500 yrs ago, God asked Job, “Can you bind the cluster of the Pleiades, Or loose the belt of Orion?” (Job 38:31)
How can he prove that something which destroys the barriers of the laws of nature, with the laws of nature? The laws of nature says, that god can not exist, so why can he use physics to prove it? that makes no sense. By proving that god exists, he is at the same time disapproving with the laws of nature... paradox...
Why does this immense, unfathomable, , allmighty, omniscient, creator need to be proven to exist by his infinitesimally small ,insignificant, creatures, Shouldn`t his existence by as obvious as the light of day ?
If he has scientific prove that god exists. he should write a scientific paper and submit it for peer review.. Maybe he is up for a Nobel prize. I doubt it. !!
@whothaplaya if god exist but does not intervene... well that's the same result as god not existing because what use is god if god is going to be useless? it's the same as god not being there. right? therefore god might as well be irrelevant. either way, exist or not, makes no real difference.
how can any1 get evidence of God?i think it's greed and selfishness is why people demand evidence of God from others.i never seen God's face yet do i demand more?i already know why he won't show himself because he stated it in the bible.to know that the bible is God's word you gotta know that he exists.
to found proof of God is not even scientific yet atheism demands to get evidence.who cares who is right and who is wrong?worry about death when the time comes.stop fighting!
This message is to harryupscrabble. You made a statement that religious people are underachievers. I respectfully disagree. First off, MOST people are underachievers regardless of what they believe. Second, prayer DOES work. People who pray DO get things done. You just have to GET UP OFF YOUR RUMP AND DO YOUR PART!! The reason that most overachievers aren't religious is because MOST PEOPLE aren't religious either.
@kvtar you are correct that most people are underachievers. but logic says that one of the most crucial requirement of success is focus and or drive. since religious people are focused on worshipping god then already time is consumed there. you can't expect driven people like albert einstein to have succeeded at physics if he was religious. religion would have eaten up his time.
@harryupbabble Your comment seems a bit silly - most of the world leaders have a strong religious background of some kind (e.g. George Bush, Barrack Obama, Gordon Brown) - to become and then work as president of the USA, or any country for that matter, I would argue that you HAVE to have a lot of drive and determination. You could even conclude that these people were successful BECAUSE they were religious, as they all have that one common donominator.
@tot1enham well there's two basic types of religious. the religious-first and the religious-second. some politicians are politicians first then religious second. they tend to be mostly about power and they tend to have "god complex". when i say "religious" i am talking about the religious-first. life itself is religion to the truly religious. life is all about god to the truly religious and everything else is second to them. politicians can be "semi-religious" and some use religion to get votes.
@harryupbabble Your assertion that there are 'two basic types of religious' may, or may not, be true. However this is only your opinion, there are no defined 'types of religious' people. I'm sure there are those that seek to use religion for reasons that are not sincere, and I'm sure that includes some politicians. However, to suggest that all successful men/women have done this is merely speculation and highly improbable. Of course, if you dedicate your life purely to ANYTHING, including
God, you will not be able to concentrate on other things. This would be the same if you were to dedicate your lif epurely to science or your job, you would probably not have a healthy family life, or purely to having a great social life, you might not be able to progress well in a demanding career. However, when people take things in moderation, which the majority of 'religous people' do (you did not state which of your 'type's you were talking about here, that was added later),
@tot1enham true. whatever you are trying to succeed at will be the thing you MIGHT succeed at. but "really really" religious people are not trying to succeed at anything. their main purpose is to ensure they get to heaven. no proof that this goal is achievable. also true that extreme achievers suffer in other life areas, social life, family, etc. but they get things done more so than the "moderate", "mediocre" types. electricity. greatest invention. was thomas edison religious? a great dad? no.
@harryupbabble I would suggest that people in that one of your 'groups' (i.e. 'really,really religous people') often DO succeed at their goal in life,as their goal in life is to become really religious people.That may be a preacher,religious warrior,pope/simply leading a life that they see as 'a good life in the eyes of God'.Their life ambition is often achieved,just as scientist might achieve its goal of discovering something.Whether or not their 'after life' goal is achieved,we may never know
@tot1enham religious people will not know if they have succeeded an what they are trying to achieve (the goal of trying to get to heaven). the only way to know success is to die first. this religious goal is very selfish since it does not benefit anybody but the religious one. inventors' or scientists' goals benefits humans. discovery of electricity benefits all who uses it. its easy to succeed at being religious. one just need to pray a lot. its not like quantum physics or something.
@harryupbabble I would disagree that it is easy to succeed with religion, although some religious people may believe that they can take an easy ride. First of all many remand require strict schedules, rituals and code of conduct (e.g. Muslims have to pray 5 times/day, Jews/Muslims can't eat many things - the list is far too long to go on) - so that is not easy if youre to follow the religion properly. Secondly the vast majority (possibly all) religions preach to treat humanity well, give
@tot1enham by "it's easy to succeed at religion" i meant anybody can do it. you don't need a high IQ or a particular talent. rituals and schedules can't be that hard to do once you are dedicated. but in, let say, physics... you need a certain mathematical mind and not just everyone can do it, no matter how dedicated.
@harryupbabble charity, help the poor etc.. This often takes a great deal of time, comitment and hard work - many charities all over the world are connected to religions and involve believers travelling and sacrificing modern comforts to help others - this is hardly selfish - even if it is simply to end up in heaven (which it may or may not be, depending on the individual) that can only serve as good on 2 fronts. It is true that religious people will only know if they have succeeded after they
@harryupbabble have died, but if they truly believe that what they are doing will send them to the heaven they are told about, then it seems common sense to try! Going back in our conversation a little way, I just want to emphasise the previous point about religious people being able to dedicate theire lives to the sciences etc.. My Mum works for Rothamsted Research in Harpenden, England. It is a world renowned and respected scientific experimental and research centre which specialises in
@harryupbabble crops and agriculture. (My Mum is a PA to one of the heads of departments by the way, not a scientist!) One of the scientists there is a Christian, and is so dedicated to his faith that, for example, he will drink nothing other than water, as he beleives it is not pure. At the centre they have made many breakthroughs for farmers in the both developed and third world countries, possibly saving the livelyhood of millions of people. They also currently work on technology to
@harryupbabble to detect explosives and so counter terrorism, as well as hundreds of other things (it was founded in 1843 and so has had plenty of time to add to the list). I am not suggesting this particular scientist is directly involved in all the great work that goes on there, but I do know that they are currently doing a lot of work regarding climate change which could potentially help us all. He is a major guy at the station so I'm in little doubt he is heavily involved.Just one case
@harryupbabble that I know of personally where a dedicated religious person is doing good for humanity and the world in general. I'm sure there are plenty of others. Also very UNselfish (they generally don't get paid too well either, although I've no idea of his particular salary.
@tot1enham you are probably correct that religious people are generous and they do charity BUT you have to remember that the reason they are being that way is because they believe in the bible and the bible tells them to do that. they are trying to PLEASE god because they believe these are the things they HAVE to do to get to heaven. so it STILL is selfish. they just want to get to heaven.
@harryupbabble LOL - I've never known anyone clarify/change their position so much - anyway, I've no doubt your sentiments are true so we'll go with your latest stance. To say that religious people are only generous and unselfish because God told them to be is pure speculation. Those people can just as easily argue that they are that way inclined because God has inspired them - either way, what they are doing is good and so your criticism can only serve to stop them doing good. I also
@tot1enham change my stance? where? speculation? maybe, but a dam good speculation tho. i speculate that the MAJORITY of church-going religious people follow the bible to the letter. and all for the expectant reward of getting to heaven. if you take away the heaven part how many people will stay religious? my guess is... NOT a lot. never did i say that good deeds is a bad thing. and good deeds are done by nonreligious people too. but a lot less pious, less sanctimonious, less "holier than thou".
@harryupbabble I have on more than one occasion noticed you 'shifting the goalposts', so to speak. For example you started by talking about all religious people - then when I disputed what you were saying, you the 'only meant certain groups'. Then you said that religious people were selfish. When I disputed this it didn't count because of the reason they were doing it, even though you have no definate idea of why they are doing it. Anyone can say their speculation is 'good speculation', but
@harryupbabble this makes it no more valid. Adolf Hitler may have speculated that the world would be better off without jews. He would have thought that was 'good speculation', it doesn't mean he's right. You have no idea why people do what they do, and you don't know that they would stop doing it if God did not exist. I beleive that if they are charitably inclined they would do their good work with or without God to see it, but, like you, I too am speculating.
@tot1enham well that was adolf hitler's biggest mistake. i happen to think that having the jews on your side is better if your goal is to rule the world. you MIGHT have people like albert einstein developing the atomic bomb for you. contrary to what mel gibson may believe i happen to think that the jews are not the cause of most of the world's problem. the major cause of problems to the mother earth is simply just... human. and greed. sure, world domination is greedy but that's beside the point.
@lizazoon yeah i agree. religion and race pride and different cultures divides humans. people like to stick with their own types. the solution to all these problems is to make everyone the same. universality. or or or find other habitable planets. that way... we can leave this one and let the mideast or arab and jews war on each other for another thousand years. end of pseudo-preach.
@tot1enham my speculation was "religious people follow the bible to the letter" and their MAIN drive is to get to heaven. how is that bad speculation? based on personal experience the religious people say to me "heaven this and heaven that". that is the bulk of what i hear from religious people.
@harryupbabble seriously doubt that even most scientists go into their profession out of care for their fellow human being - they do it because of an inqustive mind and possibly a sense of achevement and fulfilled ego if they discover something great. Was the atomic bomb really invented out of kindness and generosity - there will be many other examples of inventions and discoveries like this. To say that religion is easy simply shows a lack of understanding and is very presumptious. And I
@harryupbabble don't see that the fact that you have to have a certain IQ to be a scientist (which isn't true) or certain qualifications, proves anything. Just that you have to study and learn. If anything it shows that science is for the elite, but religion is for everyone. And of course, as per my example, you can succeed at both.
@tot1enham you can't have a low IQ to be a scientist. you need above average IQ at the very least. some people have limited mental abilities. those people can't be scientists. no offense to friends and relatives of retarded people but it's the brutal truth. true, it's always been the elite that gets the "bomb-making, electricity-harnessing, blue-printing, etc" types of jobs done. no offense but the"majority" are like drone bees. the majority does the "dumber" but still essential jobs. it's true.
@QantasNeverCrashed1 Science investigates all things that can be proven by logic and scientific laws - it rules nothing out. I f something is proven it is no longer 'supernatural' in the way you are suggesting - science is a tool for proving or disproving ANYTHING, so long as it is done in a logical and scientific way.
The reason why he didn't tell you was because most people do not understand quantum physics. If you really want the quantum "evidence" check out the featured video to the right.
humans using science to try to figure out if god exist's is like a calculator using math to figure out why man created him. it will never happen. god created us so it stands to reason that he makes his own science, his own dimensions, and his own time. so trying to "discover" him with ours, is pretty stupid. and god does allow things to happen like rape and murder but the FACT that we cause it and blame it on god is very, very childish.
@superchee2e if god doesn't want to be found then yes there's nothing primitive humans can do because god is like the greatest hider ever. or maybe it's not so hard to hide if it isn't there in the first place. the lack of evidence of god's existence seems to point to the very simple and extremely possible fact that god just doesn't exist. if god does exist then god should stop being coy and childish and just simply show up. what's the downside to god showing up?. better than absent. no doubt.
@harryupscrabble we don't know why god won't show himself, because WE will never be able to comprehend god's reasoning. we as humans "not me personally, but scientists" say that if you can't touch it or see it, it doesn't exist. we as people are taught that from birth. but god isn't seen or felt, yet he exists. and if you don't believe it than do a little more research than looking video's on youtube. "side note" youll never find it if you look just to disprove it.
@superchee2e... you typed "WE will never be able to comprehend god's reasoning" and yet the churches act like they have comprehended god's reasoning. the priests say things like "this is what god wants people to do, god wants people to be good, god wants people to be NOT homosexuals, god wants people to NOT kill fetuses etc etc". it seems like the churches knows god's reasoning. the churches also say that they know for sure that god exist. all i know is that god is a tool that some humans uses.
LOL using a formula of hardcore science. That would be math. Oh and don't worry, you won't understand it, but i do so believe me. His equation makes no fucking sense at all. It involves gravity, the coefficient of friction and speed. Then he write quantum mechanics and circles it. WAY TO BE DUMB FUCK! This guy should not be an educator.
apparently 1/2(9.8)(Coefficient of Friction)(velocity)(Resistance(potential/current) = GAWD
No. This is just the kind of crap we have to put up with from the media. How... how DARE they report this as an ACTUAL STORY. He wrote QUANTUM MECHANICS. He actually wrote it, as if it was some kind of mathematical value.
And then they have the... the... AUDACITY to proclaim that it's 'too complex for us to understand'. And don't show the full equation, in all its erroneous glory.
Sorry people, but showing shots of a guy with glasses writing things like "quantum mechanics" on a chalkboard followed by him writing "god exists" doesn't make it true. You need actual evidence.
"This professor, who's very, very, clever, has found proof that invisi - man exists using quantum mechanics and physics. But we know you wouldn't understand all that stuff, so we're not going to show you the arguments at all".
If his research was any help to one of mankind's most controversial questions, the story would be all over the world, rather than explained for 3 minutes on a local news show.
Couldn't the action eye-witness crackerjack news team consult with someone who could interpret his delusional scribblings? Edward R. Murrow must be turning over in his grave.
it's more about greed. what's wrong with this current life? the here and now. isn't it enough? why waste time being preoccupied with something (god and the afterlife) that may or may not exist? i mean if the god and the afterlife exist then good, and if doesn't then too bad too much time was wasted kneeling and looking up. why should bargaining through prayers and devotion and worship to god be a requirement to access to an afterlife that may or may not even exist? long live hedonism. hahaha.
@FIGHTFANNERD3... when you typed "no not realy dumbass " what are referring to? i totally don't have a clue. it's kind of vague. no it's more than just vague. it's vaguer than vague. seriously.
@FIGHTFANNERD3.... when you typed "no not really dumbass" what are you referring to? i totally don't know. it's kind of vague. not, it's more than just vague. it's vaguer than vague. so vague. vague, like your mom's big smelly vaguena.
@nonconservative... not racist at all. atheist here. i don't go by race. i go by achievements. the truth is that religious people tend to be underachievers because they devote their life to worship of god. they really do not get anything done. there are exceptions of course. johann bach was influenced by his love of god. but generally... most overachievers were and are atheists because... well atheists have more time and are not clouded by emotions. praying really is a big waste of time.
@harryupscrabble you are a racist and full of bullsh*t. anyone who looks up your comments/channel can see youre just another piece of propaganda spreading hate. penis envy? lol
I waited the entire video for him to tell us his "evidence" for God's existence. Nothing. The best we got was incomprehensible scrawls on a blackboard finishing in "=God", which sounds like a logical fallacy to me. I would wholeheartedly embrace scientific proof of God, but I did not see it in this video, not even close.
hahahaha you, people of the west have found everything, except the clearest thing which is God, and even if you find it, you will be worshiping the wrong God called Jesus. Wake up. Jesus was just a messenger of God. we, in the east, found God, Allah because we have his latest Book, the Quraan. an iliterate man 1400 years ago can't know that earth has 7 layers, and that there are waves in deep oceans, and that earth is egg-like formed, and talk about black holes, so it is the word of God
So, where did the universe come from. Mass energy?? God?? well, let's see one of them had to be eternal in order to be there before the universe was there. Is mass energy eternal?? no. It wears out, so that leaves God, who does not grow weary or tire. And what's with the tornado story at the end??
These are not the only two options. They're just the only two YOU can think of. Maybe ever considered asking a physicist who might actually give you an answer? And what is this "mass energy" and why does it wear out anyway? the universe most probably "came from" a collision of two branes in a 11-dimensional multiverse. What we observe as particles (ergo mass and forces) are leftover vibrations in our 3-dimensional brane from that collision (according to string-theory if i got that right)
You cannot prove God using math. Example, Heisenberg tried to predict the location of a free electron & could not. Math could not predict the final location of an electron. That led to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principal saying that quantum events could not be predicted. Neither can the existence of God. At the quantum level the universe does not conform to math and the laws of science. Einstein called the quantum entanglement of two particles "spooky action at a distance".
He was wrong, actually. The derivative of his rolle's theorem integrated twice with all of the forces of the universe factored in does not equate to god. It equates to Raptor Jesus.
quantum physics and M theory lead to the multiverse and higher dimensions of probable outcomes, if he finds any kind of god, it won't be the biblical one.
"which will be used to run computer simulations of all intelligent life that has ever lived in the history of our universe. This virtual reality emulation is what Tipler means by "the resurrection of the dead."
"Tipler says that the existence of the Omega Point is required to avoid the violation of the known laws of physics" - no a constant is required and is unknown, another person who goes "god did it"
and that we shall run computers from gods awesomeness YAY US
um, at any point in that story did he even explain how he came to this conclusion or even explain what his proof was? Either he has none or this report wasn't put together very well (or both).
when i saw your stupid little douche bag comment, i immediately thought of pabloo piccasso. i know he was not little but still. oh wait i didn't mean pabloo piccasso, i meant that guy from the mike myers movie. MiniMe is his name, i think.
I used to believe that God should intervene but maybe life is better without any kind of interference. Life is not that bad without God. Third world situations might be exaggerated just a bit. Africa should put up solar panels everywhere and sell electricity. Then the starving Africans can get fat like the rest of the world... on McDonald's.
As a questioner of questionable things and in the name of neutrality and of the uncertainty of God's existence/nonexistence and as one whose beliefs shifts. I ask.. If children are dying all over the world, chances are it's by starvation, right? What if the lesson is "don't want kids to die? then don't keep making babies... in the third world". If God exist then maybe yes God could be a cold meany but God could also be saying "you humans created these problems, you fix it, learn from it".
And that answer is that over-population may indeed be the problem in certain cases - but we can have that without any supernatural deity existing at all.
It's an extra layer to the puzzle we don't need for the same basic explanation.
@jazzx251... I am not sure which comment of mine are you replying to but yeah god is just for needy people. some people need god. why? i am not sure. i-me-myself can't think of one reason why god's existence or nonexistence makes any kind of difference. let's pretend that the religious people are right all along and that god does exist. the question is... so what?
This ridiculous professor is Fran J Tipler, his work on TOE is one of the best in the 50 top papers on TOE. He is a mathematics and Cosmology professor at Tulane University. I don't think you're in the position to call his work a steaming pile of shit, I think you're a steaming pile of shit for making such a bullshit comment.
How is God the realm of fantasy? If you don't want you rsilly atheistic idea refuted and derided I suggest you be less of an asshole that uses ad hominem, and be nice and rational.
The unified theory of Physics is not about God, so the good Professor is a great physicist PERIOD. That is his area: Mathematical Physics and Astrophysics! Gods don't come into the equation!
hay what kind of name is HomoCyborgZombie. it doesn't make sense. zombies cannot be homos they can only be lesbians coz zombie's only want to eat, they don't want to suck. jonas brothers suck. also, cyborgs don't need flesh food. hetero cyborgs need only batteries. lesbian zombies need extra batteries for flashlights and for veiny pink plastic toys. hetero cyborgs need to say things like "like tears in the rain" and are asked questions like "do androids dream of electric sheep?" haha.
in about 2% of cases... ignorance is indeed bliss. at that particular time, your comment was sort of like 2% homo milk and i was kind of blissed and far ting from lactose intolerance
Young HomoCZ, in order for logic to make sense, you first need to be logical. The name HomoCyborgZombie does not seem logical. Could I be mistaken? I doubt it. Sorry it took me days to reply, I was constipated and was trying to expel IT and at the same time I was also trying to dislodge two humungous boogers at two different nostrils. It was very hard to breathe and when I finaly was able to breathe, the room smelled like IT. God. Haha.
Right, becayse "zombies cannot be homos they can only be lesbians coz zombie's only want to eat, they don't want to suck. jonas brothers suck." is 100% logic.
As for the rest, I blame platypuses on all of it, no need for apologies on not replying.
what are platypuses? are they something like dishy beavers? no, do not tell me. i really do not want to know. i have smelled and seen way too much puses already.
umm, so best case scenario for the dude, and he found the God equation, does it identify exactly which one? Clearly he has been touched by the noodly appendage of the divine FSM, but has not realized the path he truly walks.
In wars, in trenches, with death looming, nonbelievers have been known to say something like "please God, if you let me live I will be your servant for life". This is weird because one of the surest way of ending up dead is by becoming a soldier. And, supposedly, the fastest way to meet God is to die. If suicide is a sin then shouldn't war be a sin because it is suicidal to be a soldier. I guess everything is subject to revisions.
One side attacks, the other side defends. Defenders shoot back. Being a soldier is still suicidal even for the attacking side. In peace, to kill and to commit suicide is a sin but in war, suddenly it's "screw God's book go ahead and kill and if the chance of you being killed is close to being the same as committing suicide that's too bad". During all these wars, God it seems is not even there. Isn't seeming not to be there the same as not being there? Besides the "faith" thing, what use is God?
In peace there is no need to kill. Why bring that up?
In war there is a reason. You kill to protect your loved ones. You entire statement is the same as the first and nothing contradicted what I said before.
God is here, but what is he going to do? Clap his hands and make everything stop? Choose a side and make them win? That isn't how his world works. He gave us free will and how you choose to spend your time is his gift.
When something is censored or deleted then fascism is present and commenting further is just futile. Done with this one. It was nice talking to you but fascism is a deterrence to proper discussions. Bye.
It would be wrong to take it that way. Take it this way instead: I thought that my booger comment was deleted. I admit to wrongly think that. I still say that the idea of God not doing anything is a colossal waste. If you're going to be the ultimate symbol of good then go VISIBLY do some good. I mean why not? What's the big deal? What's up with the hide and seek. Excuses for nonexistence, perhaps? Most likely. God, I dare ya. Come down and shut all us nonbelievers up and skip all this mystery.
Our rules don't apply to him. You have to understand that. Why not? He gave us life. Humans choose what they want to do. Why would he interfere? Besides, for being good, don't you think eternal life is a good enough gift for him "not being there".
I will really sound like a stupid Christian, but your last part, it is called hell...
Correct me if I am wrong but didn't God supposedly do a lot of interfering in the past? The great Flood, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah etc. God interfered then. And, LOL, appeared as a burning bush. I suspect that as the world got more modern it got harder to fool people with tales of parting seas and waterwalking etc. Therefore, made-up God appeared less and less because how can foolery pass the tests of modern science and logic and justified skepticism? Just freewill asking questions.
Wasn't that when he was trying to get us to believe in him? Every religion has a beginning. If God didn't appear in the past, how would we know about him? And please stop misinterpreting the bible in your favor. :/
Huh? Which misinterpretation? And of course God just have a great desire to be known and idolised by puny humans. Why would a being that can create the universe care what so-much-lesser beings do. That would be like a booger idolising a human. If my booger idolised me, I would just pick it and think "booger fool I have better things to do than be idolised by you", Like write stuff at YouTube. Oh wait, I would think that somebody put LSD in my coke if my booger said that. Haha. Fight? What fight?
Thats you in the corner, defending youuuuur religion. It's hard to give information to people who are never willing to accept they are wrong. You will never get answers from religious people, only brief recycled lines and insults
Hey, I am Christian. Now don't go around saying my beliefs are wrong. The greatest minds of this world still can't prove/disprove this, so what makes you think you can?
Please, I never try to push my ideas in your throats, so don't push yours down mine.
Ok, didn't mean no offence, i don't hate theists or anything. I don't really agree with ''The greatest minds of this world still can't prove/disprove this''. I think there is more than enough for us to be comparative and find answers. I have many reasons myself why I don't believe, but these only came by after learning more about religions myself. And then a brief learning of history, literature and science.
It's really up to individuals on how much they look into this. As more information can only give us a bigger and clearer picture. Information is out there, nothing is holding us back and nothing is making our minds up, but us.
Yea, it's cool. I am Christian because it has brought so many good teachings into this world, and I really believe there is a superior being out there.
"...people who are never willing to accept they are wrong ...only brief recycled lines and insults". To be fair, the same thing can be said of atheists, not just religious people. But, the superior agnostic can say "if God exist that's fine, if God does not exist that's fine too. Neither the atheist nor the religious can say that simply because both are slightly inferior. Nya nya nyanana. It's summer, I am bored, I am typing stuff. I should be picking my nose instead. Boogers need to be picked.
"I'll just throw out some complicated ideas like quantum mechanics, add some bullshit, and POOF, god exists--and if you don't get it, it's because you're not as smart as me"
Science has always been intertwined with christianity? Has this idiot read ANY history prior to the renaissance?
The renaissance? Is that a joke? The renaissace's key figures Leonardo Da Vinci was a Christian, and the most influential man of this time era was Isaac Newton, also the greatest scientist of all time, and they were both Christians.
When Deists like Voltaire attacked the Church, Newton defended Christianity by saying:
'I seek to show God's glory through-out my work.'
The enlightenment era, where mankind made it's greatest scientific advancements as well as establishing liberal democracy, was characterized by the _rejection_ of religious authority in government and the replacement of it with rational "natural" religion--like deism.
There was also a HUGE GAP in scientific advancement that you neglected to mention from the Christian dark ages, which lasted for several centuries.
The enlightenment era was headed by one of the most religious people of all time, Isaac Newton and Robert Boyle. Let's not forget about Galileo, Copernicus, Pascal, and Decartes who were all religious as well. The enlightenment era had a deistic tone in goverment, but not in Science.
It wasn't just in government, it was in philosophy as well. It's funny that you point to people like galileo and copernicus who were at odds with christianity due to their heliocentrism, which they backed with scientific evidence instead of dogma. Even Pascal had one of his books b
I agree that relativity and quantum physics prove all the concepts of God. No bs!
truthseeker010101 3 weeks ago
You are afraid, you are angry. God does exist friends. God is all around you everyday. Do you love your family? If so, prove it. Is what you feel for a child, mother or father simply a series of chemical reactions in the brain? Love exist because we feel it, we experience it. Ask someone to put love in your hand or in a box and show it to you..not possible. If you love another human being, anyone...that feeling you have for them is God.
Frab2001 1 month ago
"I became a committed christian at the age of 12..."
Case closed.
JaydeeOldBoy 7 months ago
phoenix wright would like to have a word with you.
monsterfreesocash 8 months ago
He's a math prof, not a physicist. He doesn't even know the physics he is using isn't the latest theory. He doesn't even seem to realize he is trying to prove something using theories that we've already improved upon (i.e. proved false).
His department should informally censor him for being an unprofessional goof and making his entire university look ridiculous.
KeithCanadaa 9 months ago
@chanceacalton Well, you sure got me there!
Deathgizmo 9 months ago
"So, this proves that talking snakes exist? Awesome! Hey snakey, get over here and say hi to the camera." *Snake does nothing* "Come on, you're killing me here." *Nothing still* "Well, that proves it. That he's shy, but do you know what also is complete bullshit? The bible, it depicts talking snakes, witches, and unicorns. Look 'em up"
zentos20 9 months ago
@neotropic9's description. Your opinion of nonsense does not matter to the truth of science. I havent even watched the vid, but it's a fact that a lot of high paid scientists have found strong evidence of Intel. design but aren't allowed to publish their finds. A creator exists, call it/him/her whatever you want, but it's common sense. THERMODYNAMICS STATE: NOTHING CAN COME FROM NOTHING. Therefor, something had to have always been, and it had to be intelligent. FACT. Not negotiable.
xxFairestxx 10 months ago
@xxFairestxx Call it God, call it "the source" call it "the unmoved mover," whatever you call it, there IS an intelligent creator. Religion is the system of trying to have a relationship with it. Saying there is no creator is COMPLETE and TOTAL nonsense. It shows a sheer lack of intelligence and common sense.
xxFairestxx 10 months ago
@xxFairestxx And your lack of evidence is a sheer lack of obvious intelligence and common sense
Killerclownmeat 7 months ago
@Killerclownmeat Not true. Read my post better friend, the proof is the fact of a source. God, Allah, w/e you want to call it...the source of all life is a source of intelligent energy. Scientifically proven through common sense and deductive reasoning.
Message me if you want to discuss it:)
xxFairestxx 7 months ago
You can't prove God exists, but you also cannot disprove it, common sense says there is God, we cannot prove God existence, he will prove it to the whole world soon, but in meantime, we should stick to what Bible says
Romans 1:19
since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them.
true, common sense does say what has been made could not have come into existence just like that, before you ask me and what made God, you must know, God is eternal, always was
ZanarSargamathA 11 months ago
In the last century astrophysicists have discovered that the stars of Pleiades move in unison with each other, and are thus gravitationally bound. They have also discovered that the stars of Orion are free agents that are not gravitationally bound. 3,500 yrs ago, God asked Job, “Can you bind the cluster of the Pleiades, Or loose the belt of Orion?” (Job 38:31)
YaHuwshuWaH33 11 months ago
test
YaHuwshuWaH33 11 months ago
"Christianity and Science has always been intertwined."
:D
BlloodRayyven 1 year ago
bishop eddie long haha
YungFuture01 1 year ago
well that was dumb....
sazkwatch 1 year ago
How can he prove that something which destroys the barriers of the laws of nature, with the laws of nature? The laws of nature says, that god can not exist, so why can he use physics to prove it? that makes no sense. By proving that god exists, he is at the same time disapproving with the laws of nature... paradox...
hatzifratzi 1 year ago
Why does this immense, unfathomable, , allmighty, omniscient, creator need to be proven to exist by his infinitesimally small ,insignificant, creatures, Shouldn`t his existence by as obvious as the light of day ?
lizazoon 1 year ago
LoL! You know nothing of science "professor".
ubersteigen 1 year ago
I think he's just exploiting the fact that most people are ignorant about the theories of relativity and quantum mechanics.
gupsphoo 1 year ago
Does he believe pschyciatrist exist? Because I'd suggest he go see one and get on sometype of medication before his delusions get worse!
crazy4carolyn 1 year ago
I dont get , whata fuck quantum physic has to do with god?
kingfker 1 year ago
god is a lie
LordStarscreamPrime 1 year ago
If he has scientific prove that god exists. he should write a scientific paper and submit it for peer review.. Maybe he is up for a Nobel prize. I doubt it. !!
lizazoon 1 year ago
God allows the universe to evolve according to a set of laws and does not intervene in the universe to break these laws.- Stephen Hawking
whothaplaya 1 year ago
@whothaplaya if god exist but does not intervene... well that's the same result as god not existing because what use is god if god is going to be useless? it's the same as god not being there. right? therefore god might as well be irrelevant. either way, exist or not, makes no real difference.
harryupbabble 1 year ago
how can any1 get evidence of God?i think it's greed and selfishness is why people demand evidence of God from others.i never seen God's face yet do i demand more?i already know why he won't show himself because he stated it in the bible.to know that the bible is God's word you gotta know that he exists.
to found proof of God is not even scientific yet atheism demands to get evidence.who cares who is right and who is wrong?worry about death when the time comes.stop fighting!
musicfreak2621 1 year ago
God does exist.
SummerSunshine1988 1 year ago
0:55
you known whats also in advanced realitivity? NOTHING IS INFINITE
p.s is it me or does his equation look like a work of a 8th grader
BaltoMovie 1 year ago
This message is to harryupscrabble. You made a statement that religious people are underachievers. I respectfully disagree. First off, MOST people are underachievers regardless of what they believe. Second, prayer DOES work. People who pray DO get things done. You just have to GET UP OFF YOUR RUMP AND DO YOUR PART!! The reason that most overachievers aren't religious is because MOST PEOPLE aren't religious either.
kvtar 1 year ago
@kvtar you are correct that most people are underachievers. but logic says that one of the most crucial requirement of success is focus and or drive. since religious people are focused on worshipping god then already time is consumed there. you can't expect driven people like albert einstein to have succeeded at physics if he was religious. religion would have eaten up his time.
harryupbabble 1 year ago
@harryupbabble Your comment seems a bit silly - most of the world leaders have a strong religious background of some kind (e.g. George Bush, Barrack Obama, Gordon Brown) - to become and then work as president of the USA, or any country for that matter, I would argue that you HAVE to have a lot of drive and determination. You could even conclude that these people were successful BECAUSE they were religious, as they all have that one common donominator.
tot1enham 1 year ago
@tot1enham well there's two basic types of religious. the religious-first and the religious-second. some politicians are politicians first then religious second. they tend to be mostly about power and they tend to have "god complex". when i say "religious" i am talking about the religious-first. life itself is religion to the truly religious. life is all about god to the truly religious and everything else is second to them. politicians can be "semi-religious" and some use religion to get votes.
harryupbabble 1 year ago
@harryupbabble Your assertion that there are 'two basic types of religious' may, or may not, be true. However this is only your opinion, there are no defined 'types of religious' people. I'm sure there are those that seek to use religion for reasons that are not sincere, and I'm sure that includes some politicians. However, to suggest that all successful men/women have done this is merely speculation and highly improbable. Of course, if you dedicate your life purely to ANYTHING, including
tot1enham 1 year ago
God, you will not be able to concentrate on other things. This would be the same if you were to dedicate your lif epurely to science or your job, you would probably not have a healthy family life, or purely to having a great social life, you might not be able to progress well in a demanding career. However, when people take things in moderation, which the majority of 'religous people' do (you did not state which of your 'type's you were talking about here, that was added later),
tot1enham 1 year ago
@tot1enham true. whatever you are trying to succeed at will be the thing you MIGHT succeed at. but "really really" religious people are not trying to succeed at anything. their main purpose is to ensure they get to heaven. no proof that this goal is achievable. also true that extreme achievers suffer in other life areas, social life, family, etc. but they get things done more so than the "moderate", "mediocre" types. electricity. greatest invention. was thomas edison religious? a great dad? no.
harryupbabble 1 year ago
@harryupbabble I would suggest that people in that one of your 'groups' (i.e. 'really,really religous people') often DO succeed at their goal in life,as their goal in life is to become really religious people.That may be a preacher,religious warrior,pope/simply leading a life that they see as 'a good life in the eyes of God'.Their life ambition is often achieved,just as scientist might achieve its goal of discovering something.Whether or not their 'after life' goal is achieved,we may never know
tot1enham 1 year ago
@tot1enham religious people will not know if they have succeeded an what they are trying to achieve (the goal of trying to get to heaven). the only way to know success is to die first. this religious goal is very selfish since it does not benefit anybody but the religious one. inventors' or scientists' goals benefits humans. discovery of electricity benefits all who uses it. its easy to succeed at being religious. one just need to pray a lot. its not like quantum physics or something.
harryupbabble 1 year ago
@harryupbabble I would disagree that it is easy to succeed with religion, although some religious people may believe that they can take an easy ride. First of all many remand require strict schedules, rituals and code of conduct (e.g. Muslims have to pray 5 times/day, Jews/Muslims can't eat many things - the list is far too long to go on) - so that is not easy if youre to follow the religion properly. Secondly the vast majority (possibly all) religions preach to treat humanity well, give
tot1enham 1 year ago
@tot1enham by "it's easy to succeed at religion" i meant anybody can do it. you don't need a high IQ or a particular talent. rituals and schedules can't be that hard to do once you are dedicated. but in, let say, physics... you need a certain mathematical mind and not just everyone can do it, no matter how dedicated.
harryupbabble 1 year ago
@harryupbabble charity, help the poor etc.. This often takes a great deal of time, comitment and hard work - many charities all over the world are connected to religions and involve believers travelling and sacrificing modern comforts to help others - this is hardly selfish - even if it is simply to end up in heaven (which it may or may not be, depending on the individual) that can only serve as good on 2 fronts. It is true that religious people will only know if they have succeeded after they
tot1enham 1 year ago
@harryupbabble have died, but if they truly believe that what they are doing will send them to the heaven they are told about, then it seems common sense to try! Going back in our conversation a little way, I just want to emphasise the previous point about religious people being able to dedicate theire lives to the sciences etc.. My Mum works for Rothamsted Research in Harpenden, England. It is a world renowned and respected scientific experimental and research centre which specialises in
tot1enham 1 year ago
@harryupbabble crops and agriculture. (My Mum is a PA to one of the heads of departments by the way, not a scientist!) One of the scientists there is a Christian, and is so dedicated to his faith that, for example, he will drink nothing other than water, as he beleives it is not pure. At the centre they have made many breakthroughs for farmers in the both developed and third world countries, possibly saving the livelyhood of millions of people. They also currently work on technology to
tot1enham 1 year ago
@harryupbabble to detect explosives and so counter terrorism, as well as hundreds of other things (it was founded in 1843 and so has had plenty of time to add to the list). I am not suggesting this particular scientist is directly involved in all the great work that goes on there, but I do know that they are currently doing a lot of work regarding climate change which could potentially help us all. He is a major guy at the station so I'm in little doubt he is heavily involved.Just one case
tot1enham 1 year ago
@harryupbabble that I know of personally where a dedicated religious person is doing good for humanity and the world in general. I'm sure there are plenty of others. Also very UNselfish (they generally don't get paid too well either, although I've no idea of his particular salary.
tot1enham 1 year ago
@tot1enham you are probably correct that religious people are generous and they do charity BUT you have to remember that the reason they are being that way is because they believe in the bible and the bible tells them to do that. they are trying to PLEASE god because they believe these are the things they HAVE to do to get to heaven. so it STILL is selfish. they just want to get to heaven.
harryupbabble 1 year ago
@harryupbabble LOL - I've never known anyone clarify/change their position so much - anyway, I've no doubt your sentiments are true so we'll go with your latest stance. To say that religious people are only generous and unselfish because God told them to be is pure speculation. Those people can just as easily argue that they are that way inclined because God has inspired them - either way, what they are doing is good and so your criticism can only serve to stop them doing good. I also
tot1enham 1 year ago
@tot1enham change my stance? where? speculation? maybe, but a dam good speculation tho. i speculate that the MAJORITY of church-going religious people follow the bible to the letter. and all for the expectant reward of getting to heaven. if you take away the heaven part how many people will stay religious? my guess is... NOT a lot. never did i say that good deeds is a bad thing. and good deeds are done by nonreligious people too. but a lot less pious, less sanctimonious, less "holier than thou".
harryupbabble 1 year ago
@harryupbabble I have on more than one occasion noticed you 'shifting the goalposts', so to speak. For example you started by talking about all religious people - then when I disputed what you were saying, you the 'only meant certain groups'. Then you said that religious people were selfish. When I disputed this it didn't count because of the reason they were doing it, even though you have no definate idea of why they are doing it. Anyone can say their speculation is 'good speculation', but
tot1enham 1 year ago
@harryupbabble this makes it no more valid. Adolf Hitler may have speculated that the world would be better off without jews. He would have thought that was 'good speculation', it doesn't mean he's right. You have no idea why people do what they do, and you don't know that they would stop doing it if God did not exist. I beleive that if they are charitably inclined they would do their good work with or without God to see it, but, like you, I too am speculating.
tot1enham 1 year ago
@tot1enham well that was adolf hitler's biggest mistake. i happen to think that having the jews on your side is better if your goal is to rule the world. you MIGHT have people like albert einstein developing the atomic bomb for you. contrary to what mel gibson may believe i happen to think that the jews are not the cause of most of the world's problem. the major cause of problems to the mother earth is simply just... human. and greed. sure, world domination is greedy but that's beside the point.
harryupbabble 1 year ago
@harryupbabble The bible and the quran are a big part of the worlds` problems today
lizazoon 1 year ago
@lizazoon yeah i agree. religion and race pride and different cultures divides humans. people like to stick with their own types. the solution to all these problems is to make everyone the same. universality. or or or find other habitable planets. that way... we can leave this one and let the mideast or arab and jews war on each other for another thousand years. end of pseudo-preach.
harryupbabble 1 year ago
@tot1enham my speculation was "religious people follow the bible to the letter" and their MAIN drive is to get to heaven. how is that bad speculation? based on personal experience the religious people say to me "heaven this and heaven that". that is the bulk of what i hear from religious people.
harryupbabble 1 year ago
@harryupbabble seriously doubt that even most scientists go into their profession out of care for their fellow human being - they do it because of an inqustive mind and possibly a sense of achevement and fulfilled ego if they discover something great. Was the atomic bomb really invented out of kindness and generosity - there will be many other examples of inventions and discoveries like this. To say that religion is easy simply shows a lack of understanding and is very presumptious. And I
tot1enham 1 year ago
@harryupbabble don't see that the fact that you have to have a certain IQ to be a scientist (which isn't true) or certain qualifications, proves anything. Just that you have to study and learn. If anything it shows that science is for the elite, but religion is for everyone. And of course, as per my example, you can succeed at both.
tot1enham 1 year ago
@tot1enham you can't have a low IQ to be a scientist. you need above average IQ at the very least. some people have limited mental abilities. those people can't be scientists. no offense to friends and relatives of retarded people but it's the brutal truth. true, it's always been the elite that gets the "bomb-making, electricity-harnessing, blue-printing, etc" types of jobs done. no offense but the"majority" are like drone bees. the majority does the "dumber" but still essential jobs. it's true.
harryupbabble 1 year ago
most people will succeed in the end, some tremendously so.
tot1enham 1 year ago
This is a violation of the Philosophy of Science. Science makes no comment on the supernatural, neither pro nor con. End of discussion.
QantasNeverCrashed1 1 year ago
@QantasNeverCrashed1 Science investigates all things that can be proven by logic and scientific laws - it rules nothing out. I f something is proven it is no longer 'supernatural' in the way you are suggesting - science is a tool for proving or disproving ANYTHING, so long as it is done in a logical and scientific way.
tot1enham 1 year ago
OMFG TORNADO!!!
tj11112129 1 year ago
The tornado is proof that this guy is right. :-)
imperiumdiaboli 1 year ago
The reason why he didn't tell you was because most people do not understand quantum physics. If you really want the quantum "evidence" check out the featured video to the right.
GateMessenger 1 year ago
humans using science to try to figure out if god exist's is like a calculator using math to figure out why man created him. it will never happen. god created us so it stands to reason that he makes his own science, his own dimensions, and his own time. so trying to "discover" him with ours, is pretty stupid. and god does allow things to happen like rape and murder but the FACT that we cause it and blame it on god is very, very childish.
superchee2e 1 year ago
@superchee2e if god doesn't want to be found then yes there's nothing primitive humans can do because god is like the greatest hider ever. or maybe it's not so hard to hide if it isn't there in the first place. the lack of evidence of god's existence seems to point to the very simple and extremely possible fact that god just doesn't exist. if god does exist then god should stop being coy and childish and just simply show up. what's the downside to god showing up?. better than absent. no doubt.
harryupscrabble 1 year ago
@harryupscrabble we don't know why god won't show himself, because WE will never be able to comprehend god's reasoning. we as humans "not me personally, but scientists" say that if you can't touch it or see it, it doesn't exist. we as people are taught that from birth. but god isn't seen or felt, yet he exists. and if you don't believe it than do a little more research than looking video's on youtube. "side note" youll never find it if you look just to disprove it.
superchee2e 1 year ago
@superchee2e... you typed "WE will never be able to comprehend god's reasoning" and yet the churches act like they have comprehended god's reasoning. the priests say things like "this is what god wants people to do, god wants people to be good, god wants people to be NOT homosexuals, god wants people to NOT kill fetuses etc etc". it seems like the churches knows god's reasoning. the churches also say that they know for sure that god exist. all i know is that god is a tool that some humans uses.
harryupscrabble 1 year ago
What does scientific proof mean to Christians anyway?
Scientist: God doesn't exist.
Christian: Science is wrong.
Scientist: God does exist.
Christian: Science and religion can work together!
roxef 1 year ago
God exists and science will always prove that. If you have any speculations than ask away.
myjumbalaya 1 year ago
Lol
dX/dT = Corinthians 1:10
What a load of horse crap.
jazzx251 1 year ago
How about you all look up his works? His ideas are actually respected in the scientific world, even though I don't agree with them.
valken666 1 year ago
LOL using a formula of hardcore science. That would be math. Oh and don't worry, you won't understand it, but i do so believe me. His equation makes no fucking sense at all. It involves gravity, the coefficient of friction and speed. Then he write quantum mechanics and circles it. WAY TO BE DUMB FUCK! This guy should not be an educator.
apparently 1/2(9.8)(Coefficient of Friction)(velocity)(Resistance(potential/current) = GAWD
snipeshow920 1 year ago
....
.....
*speechless*
...wow. Hehehe. HAAAHAAHAAAHAAAAAHAAAAAA XD
No. This is just the kind of crap we have to put up with from the media. How... how DARE they report this as an ACTUAL STORY. He wrote QUANTUM MECHANICS. He actually wrote it, as if it was some kind of mathematical value.
And then they have the... the... AUDACITY to proclaim that it's 'too complex for us to understand'. And don't show the full equation, in all its erroneous glory.
Sickening.
VillainousOperative 2 years ago
I thought all college professors were atheists.Reason for this kind of thinking,I suppose is they come on as goofy and phony with no reasoning.
vrghiks 2 years ago
Sorry people, but showing shots of a guy with glasses writing things like "quantum mechanics" on a chalkboard followed by him writing "god exists" doesn't make it true. You need actual evidence.
Deathgizmo 2 years ago 10
"This professor, who's very, very, clever, has found proof that invisi - man exists using quantum mechanics and physics. But we know you wouldn't understand all that stuff, so we're not going to show you the arguments at all".
Deathgizmo 2 years ago
and that the sun and the moon have their own orbits and that the sun moves, and and and
omarzellal 2 years ago
âhahhahahhahahahah :D
ir86 2 years ago
ok,so he believes god exists based on this,but can science indicate if any of the religions are true?
TLSlayer 2 years ago
Ah, the joys and pleasures of tenure.
ibtrippen 2 years ago
Comment removed
MrNerify 2 years ago
Too long; didn't watch version:
'Science is science, so god must exist.'
What?
zachy12341 2 years ago
0:40 "Hardcore Science"??? Sounds sexy
Mathewmatic 2 years ago
If his research was any help to one of mankind's most controversial questions, the story would be all over the world, rather than explained for 3 minutes on a local news show.
WinglessIceAngel 2 years ago 2
Couldn't the action eye-witness crackerjack news team consult with someone who could interpret his delusional scribblings? Edward R. Murrow must be turning over in his grave.
robfanclub 2 years ago
well, the thing is... if god does exist then so what?
and if god does not exist then also so what? what exactly is the impact either way?
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
It is all about the afterlife. LOL!
KSH2006 2 years ago
it's more about greed. what's wrong with this current life? the here and now. isn't it enough? why waste time being preoccupied with something (god and the afterlife) that may or may not exist? i mean if the god and the afterlife exist then good, and if doesn't then too bad too much time was wasted kneeling and looking up. why should bargaining through prayers and devotion and worship to god be a requirement to access to an afterlife that may or may not even exist? long live hedonism. hahaha.
harryupscrabble 2 years ago 6
LOL!. Where did you get greed from?
KSH2006 2 years ago
afterlife... the desire for more life after death is greed. is it not?
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
I was wondering why you came to that conclusion. I like the way how you answered it. Nicely said.
KSH2006 2 years ago
i am glad you think so. thank you very much for the compliment.
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
no not realy dumbass
FIGHTFANNERD3 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FIGHTFANNERD3... when you typed "no not realy dumbass " what are referring to? i totally don't have a clue. it's kind of vague. no it's more than just vague. it's vaguer than vague. seriously.
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
@FIGHTFANNERD3.... when you typed "no not really dumbass" what are you referring to? i totally don't know. it's kind of vague. not, it's more than just vague. it's vaguer than vague. so vague. vague, like your mom's big smelly vaguena.
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
What a plesant chap you are.
postme12 2 years ago
@postme12...sarcasm acknowledged.
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
@harryupscrabble ok "word warrior" racist
nonconservative 1 year ago
@nonconservative... not racist at all. atheist here. i don't go by race. i go by achievements. the truth is that religious people tend to be underachievers because they devote their life to worship of god. they really do not get anything done. there are exceptions of course. johann bach was influenced by his love of god. but generally... most overachievers were and are atheists because... well atheists have more time and are not clouded by emotions. praying really is a big waste of time.
harryupscrabble 1 year ago
@harryupscrabble you are a racist and full of bullsh*t. anyone who looks up your comments/channel can see youre just another piece of propaganda spreading hate. penis envy? lol
nonconservative 1 year ago
Haha you think he can hear you? Why don't you scream in CAPS a little louder?
coolkid5289 2 years ago
Hey doc why don't you publish your goatshit in a journal and become a fuckillionaire??? WHY NOT???
majav15mg 2 years ago
I waited the entire video for him to tell us his "evidence" for God's existence. Nothing. The best we got was incomprehensible scrawls on a blackboard finishing in "=God", which sounds like a logical fallacy to me. I would wholeheartedly embrace scientific proof of God, but I did not see it in this video, not even close.
nemo3590 2 years ago 5
Agreed.
KSH2006 2 years ago 2
hahahaha you, people of the west have found everything, except the clearest thing which is God, and even if you find it, you will be worshiping the wrong God called Jesus. Wake up. Jesus was just a messenger of God. we, in the east, found God, Allah because we have his latest Book, the Quraan. an iliterate man 1400 years ago can't know that earth has 7 layers, and that there are waves in deep oceans, and that earth is egg-like formed, and talk about black holes, so it is the word of God
omarzellal 2 years ago
How is this a reply to my comment? Troll elsewhere please, kthnx.
nemo3590 2 years ago
So, where did the universe come from. Mass energy?? God?? well, let's see one of them had to be eternal in order to be there before the universe was there. Is mass energy eternal?? no. It wears out, so that leaves God, who does not grow weary or tire. And what's with the tornado story at the end??
Twinkies4myfamily 2 years ago
These are not the only two options. They're just the only two YOU can think of. Maybe ever considered asking a physicist who might actually give you an answer? And what is this "mass energy" and why does it wear out anyway? the universe most probably "came from" a collision of two branes in a 11-dimensional multiverse. What we observe as particles (ergo mass and forces) are leftover vibrations in our 3-dimensional brane from that collision (according to string-theory if i got that right)
Schraupe 2 years ago
the preist paid him.
amen.
yummycars 2 years ago 2
This imbecile should have his PhD revoked.
KakashiBallZ 2 years ago 2
You cannot prove God using math. Example, Heisenberg tried to predict the location of a free electron & could not. Math could not predict the final location of an electron. That led to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principal saying that quantum events could not be predicted. Neither can the existence of God. At the quantum level the universe does not conform to math and the laws of science. Einstein called the quantum entanglement of two particles "spooky action at a distance".
GateMessenger 2 years ago
He was wrong, actually. The derivative of his rolle's theorem integrated twice with all of the forces of the universe factored in does not equate to god. It equates to Raptor Jesus.
Plethorix 2 years ago
win!
ctvwr 2 years ago
quantum physics and M theory lead to the multiverse and higher dimensions of probable outcomes, if he finds any kind of god, it won't be the biblical one.
sethorlando 2 years ago 2
Right, it will be a pantheist God.
GateMessenger 2 years ago
LOL hes a muppet essentially
"which will be used to run computer simulations of all intelligent life that has ever lived in the history of our universe. This virtual reality emulation is what Tipler means by "the resurrection of the dead."
"Tipler says that the existence of the Omega Point is required to avoid the violation of the known laws of physics" - no a constant is required and is unknown, another person who goes "god did it"
and that we shall run computers from gods awesomeness YAY US
3wrongnotes 2 years ago
The guy is full of crap. Quantum mechanics isn't a true science.
emeralds222 2 years ago
What exactly was the point of him stating that he was still a Christian at the age of 16?O_o
chinchychilla 2 years ago
um, at any point in that story did he even explain how he came to this conclusion or even explain what his proof was? Either he has none or this report wasn't put together very well (or both).
vgfmak 2 years ago
when i saw your stupid little douche bag comment, i immediately thought of pabloo piccasso. i know he was not little but still. oh wait i didn't mean pabloo piccasso, i meant that guy from the mike myers movie. MiniMe is his name, i think.
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
This guy...for a scientist he sure is a stupid little douche bag.
TowelWipe 2 years ago
basicly everyone can call oneself scientist.
ValdeVeldo 2 years ago
well i don't think forrest gump can himself scientist coz he probably can't even say the word "scientist"
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
I used to believe that God should intervene but maybe life is better without any kind of interference. Life is not that bad without God. Third world situations might be exaggerated just a bit. Africa should put up solar panels everywhere and sell electricity. Then the starving Africans can get fat like the rest of the world... on McDonald's.
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
a) The Christian is (apparently)
(i) All powerful
(ii) All knowing
(iii) All loving
b) Children are dying in pain and poverty all over the world
(i) he knows and wants to change but can't and therefore is not all powerful
(ii) he could change it and would care but doesn't know, then he isn't all knowing
(iii) he knows and could change it but doesn't want to, therefore is not all loving
Thus I conclude, that the christian god does not exist.
RanDom2BugGeR 2 years ago 3
As a questioner of questionable things and in the name of neutrality and of the uncertainty of God's existence/nonexistence and as one whose beliefs shifts. I ask.. If children are dying all over the world, chances are it's by starvation, right? What if the lesson is "don't want kids to die? then don't keep making babies... in the third world". If God exist then maybe yes God could be a cold meany but God could also be saying "you humans created these problems, you fix it, learn from it".
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
Occam's razor.
The simplest answer is the best.
And that answer is that over-population may indeed be the problem in certain cases - but we can have that without any supernatural deity existing at all.
It's an extra layer to the puzzle we don't need for the same basic explanation.
jazzx251 1 year ago
@jazzx251... I am not sure which comment of mine are you replying to but yeah god is just for needy people. some people need god. why? i am not sure. i-me-myself can't think of one reason why god's existence or nonexistence makes any kind of difference. let's pretend that the religious people are right all along and that god does exist. the question is... so what?
harryupscrabble 1 year ago
word warrior
nonconservative 1 year ago
what a heap of SHIT
MattChez 2 years ago
Comment removed
MaamsJoan 2 years ago
Comment removed
MaamsJoan 2 years ago
This ridiculous professor is Fran J Tipler, his work on TOE is one of the best in the 50 top papers on TOE. He is a mathematics and Cosmology professor at Tulane University. I don't think you're in the position to call his work a steaming pile of shit, I think you're a steaming pile of shit for making such a bullshit comment.
ogirv101 2 years ago
He should stick with his subjects: Mathematics and Cosmology, and not get into the realms of fantasy!
MaamsJoan 2 years ago
How is God the realm of fantasy? If you don't want you rsilly atheistic idea refuted and derided I suggest you be less of an asshole that uses ad hominem, and be nice and rational.
ogirv101 2 years ago
Language, language.... tch tch!
The unified theory of Physics is not about God, so the good Professor is a great physicist PERIOD. That is his area: Mathematical Physics and Astrophysics! Gods don't come into the equation!
MaamsJoan 2 years ago
God comes after the equation when we appreciate the harmony, uniformity, simplicity, and beauty of the Universe which these equations reveal.
'mere disbelief in a personal God is no philosophy at all' -Albert Einstein
ogirv101 2 years ago
What an idiot.
If god does exists, than we should figure out which god.
HomoCyborgZombie 2 years ago
hay what kind of name is HomoCyborgZombie. it doesn't make sense. zombies cannot be homos they can only be lesbians coz zombie's only want to eat, they don't want to suck. jonas brothers suck. also, cyborgs don't need flesh food. hetero cyborgs need only batteries. lesbian zombies need extra batteries for flashlights and for veiny pink plastic toys. hetero cyborgs need to say things like "like tears in the rain" and are asked questions like "do androids dream of electric sheep?" haha.
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
Wow, way to completely ignore the comment.
HomoCyborgZombie 2 years ago
in about 2% of cases... ignorance is indeed bliss. at that particular time, your comment was sort of like 2% homo milk and i was kind of blissed and far ting from lactose intolerance
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
You're not making any sense, old man.
HomoCyborgZombie 2 years ago
Young HomoCZ, in order for logic to make sense, you first need to be logical. The name HomoCyborgZombie does not seem logical. Could I be mistaken? I doubt it. Sorry it took me days to reply, I was constipated and was trying to expel IT and at the same time I was also trying to dislodge two humungous boogers at two different nostrils. It was very hard to breathe and when I finaly was able to breathe, the room smelled like IT. God. Haha.
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
Right, becayse "zombies cannot be homos they can only be lesbians coz zombie's only want to eat, they don't want to suck. jonas brothers suck." is 100% logic.
As for the rest, I blame platypuses on all of it, no need for apologies on not replying.
HomoCyborgZombie 2 years ago
what are platypuses? are they something like dishy beavers? no, do not tell me. i really do not want to know. i have smelled and seen way too much puses already.
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
What?
HomoCyborgZombie 2 years ago
ROFL, his "hard core equation" @ 0:49...
{Einsteins equation} [General Relativity] + {Quantum Mechanics} => God Exist? WTF?
Maybe it was for the reporters?
pyro2290 2 years ago
hehehehe "hardcore science"
umm, so best case scenario for the dude, and he found the God equation, does it identify exactly which one? Clearly he has been touched by the noodly appendage of the divine FSM, but has not realized the path he truly walks.
Greichen 2 years ago
In wars, in trenches, with death looming, nonbelievers have been known to say something like "please God, if you let me live I will be your servant for life". This is weird because one of the surest way of ending up dead is by becoming a soldier. And, supposedly, the fastest way to meet God is to die. If suicide is a sin then shouldn't war be a sin because it is suicidal to be a soldier. I guess everything is subject to revisions.
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
You defend your country and your loved ones in war. If you go to war for any other reasons than for your own selfish desires, you are a sinner.
XmetaI4everX 2 years ago
One side attacks, the other side defends. Defenders shoot back. Being a soldier is still suicidal even for the attacking side. In peace, to kill and to commit suicide is a sin but in war, suddenly it's "screw God's book go ahead and kill and if the chance of you being killed is close to being the same as committing suicide that's too bad". During all these wars, God it seems is not even there. Isn't seeming not to be there the same as not being there? Besides the "faith" thing, what use is God?
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
In peace there is no need to kill. Why bring that up?
In war there is a reason. You kill to protect your loved ones. You entire statement is the same as the first and nothing contradicted what I said before.
God is here, but what is he going to do? Clap his hands and make everything stop? Choose a side and make them win? That isn't how his world works. He gave us free will and how you choose to spend your time is his gift.
XmetaI4everX 2 years ago
When something is censored or deleted then fascism is present and commenting further is just futile. Done with this one. It was nice talking to you but fascism is a deterrence to proper discussions. Bye.
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
I'll just take that as you admit you were wrong. ¬_¬
XmetaI4everX 2 years ago
It would be wrong to take it that way. Take it this way instead: I thought that my booger comment was deleted. I admit to wrongly think that. I still say that the idea of God not doing anything is a colossal waste. If you're going to be the ultimate symbol of good then go VISIBLY do some good. I mean why not? What's the big deal? What's up with the hide and seek. Excuses for nonexistence, perhaps? Most likely. God, I dare ya. Come down and shut all us nonbelievers up and skip all this mystery.
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
Our rules don't apply to him. You have to understand that. Why not? He gave us life. Humans choose what they want to do. Why would he interfere? Besides, for being good, don't you think eternal life is a good enough gift for him "not being there".
I will really sound like a stupid Christian, but your last part, it is called hell...
XmetaI4everX 2 years ago
Correct me if I am wrong but didn't God supposedly do a lot of interfering in the past? The great Flood, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah etc. God interfered then. And, LOL, appeared as a burning bush. I suspect that as the world got more modern it got harder to fool people with tales of parting seas and waterwalking etc. Therefore, made-up God appeared less and less because how can foolery pass the tests of modern science and logic and justified skepticism? Just freewill asking questions.
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
Wasn't that when he was trying to get us to believe in him? Every religion has a beginning. If God didn't appear in the past, how would we know about him? And please stop misinterpreting the bible in your favor. :/
You have failed to comeback my other answers.
XmetaI4everX 2 years ago
Huh? Which misinterpretation? And of course God just have a great desire to be known and idolised by puny humans. Why would a being that can create the universe care what so-much-lesser beings do. That would be like a booger idolising a human. If my booger idolised me, I would just pick it and think "booger fool I have better things to do than be idolised by you", Like write stuff at YouTube. Oh wait, I would think that somebody put LSD in my coke if my booger said that. Haha. Fight? What fight?
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
Wait, wait, I just need to say something. I don't want to fight if God exists anymore. You won't convince me and I won't convince you. Peace?
XmetaI4everX 2 years ago
Thats you in the corner, defending youuuuur religion. It's hard to give information to people who are never willing to accept they are wrong. You will never get answers from religious people, only brief recycled lines and insults
ZClipze 2 years ago
As well as completely fucking illogical bullshit with the aim of keeping their beliefs in mind. Denial and lies doesn't help anyone grow/learn
ZClipze 2 years ago
Hey, I am Christian. Now don't go around saying my beliefs are wrong. The greatest minds of this world still can't prove/disprove this, so what makes you think you can?
Please, I never try to push my ideas in your throats, so don't push yours down mine.
XmetaI4everX 2 years ago
Ok, didn't mean no offence, i don't hate theists or anything. I don't really agree with ''The greatest minds of this world still can't prove/disprove this''. I think there is more than enough for us to be comparative and find answers. I have many reasons myself why I don't believe, but these only came by after learning more about religions myself. And then a brief learning of history, literature and science.
ZClipze 2 years ago
It's really up to individuals on how much they look into this. As more information can only give us a bigger and clearer picture. Information is out there, nothing is holding us back and nothing is making our minds up, but us.
ZClipze 2 years ago
Yea, it's cool. I am Christian because it has brought so many good teachings into this world, and I really believe there is a superior being out there.
XmetaI4everX 2 years ago
"...people who are never willing to accept they are wrong ...only brief recycled lines and insults". To be fair, the same thing can be said of atheists, not just religious people. But, the superior agnostic can say "if God exist that's fine, if God does not exist that's fine too. Neither the atheist nor the religious can say that simply because both are slightly inferior. Nya nya nyanana. It's summer, I am bored, I am typing stuff. I should be picking my nose instead. Boogers need to be picked.
harryupscrabble 2 years ago
ROFL
"I'll just throw out some complicated ideas like quantum mechanics, add some bullshit, and POOF, god exists--and if you don't get it, it's because you're not as smart as me"
Science has always been intertwined with christianity? Has this idiot read ANY history prior to the renaissance?
j01tz0r 2 years ago
The renaissance? Is that a joke? The renaissace's key figures Leonardo Da Vinci was a Christian, and the most influential man of this time era was Isaac Newton, also the greatest scientist of all time, and they were both Christians.
When Deists like Voltaire attacked the Church, Newton defended Christianity by saying:
'I seek to show God's glory through-out my work.'
ogirv101 2 years ago
The enlightenment era, where mankind made it's greatest scientific advancements as well as establishing liberal democracy, was characterized by the _rejection_ of religious authority in government and the replacement of it with rational "natural" religion--like deism.
There was also a HUGE GAP in scientific advancement that you neglected to mention from the Christian dark ages, which lasted for several centuries.
j01tz0r 2 years ago
The enlightenment era was headed by one of the most religious people of all time, Isaac Newton and Robert Boyle. Let's not forget about Galileo, Copernicus, Pascal, and Decartes who were all religious as well. The enlightenment era had a deistic tone in goverment, but not in Science.
ogirv101 2 years ago
It wasn't just in government, it was in philosophy as well. It's funny that you point to people like galileo and copernicus who were at odds with christianity due to their heliocentrism, which they backed with scientific evidence instead of dogma. Even Pascal had one of his books b