Limbaugh is in his own words a "water carrier for the GOP" but AXELROD is Iindeed an operative for the filthy TROTSKYITE ZIONIST JEWS who have infested this nation. Too bad Hitler didn't have time to finish the job.
as long as RUsh continues to be the de facto voice of the GOP and the GOP in turn grovals at his feet the American people will continue to reject them. Rush is an extremist idiot. Repubs, take back your party, return the sanity, get with the program, stop opossing everything the Dems do (some of it is good) just to earn political points and find a new way to lead, rather than the same old tired crap America has rejected.
Subtle attacks are good as counter-punches. But what we really need is a NO ATTACK, NO SPIN discussion of the facts. Axelrod has the winning argument here, there's no need to get personal (although Rush does the same).
When mainstream conservatives (and Republicans) stop asking "What would Reagan/Limbaugh do?" and begin to learn how to THINK ON THEIR OWN, they may someday have some semblance of credibility. Not holding my breath . . .
Thats the truth, more like he would have been charged with intend to sell or distribute with the amount of drugs he was using, that and because Oxycontin is a narcotic and is regulated by Police, he would have gotten more than a smack on the wrist.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What is Axelrod trying to change the subject. rush experience with the law crap? am not the biggest Limbaugh fan.
sotomayor never had trouble with the law. Maybe, she would have trouble understanding it. sotomayor purpose in the Supreme Court is to write laws. For example, look at Rove vs Wade.
Gunrights will be attacked by her. Obama is very wicked smart.
His attack on Rush is irrelevant. But the primary point of SCOTUS is to clarify positions of law that are overly vague. And clarification of any type is policy making, clearly, because you are giving specificity to something that was previously vague. I fail to see why anyone has a problem with that concept. The question is how will she do that not if she will.
You may want that to be the case but it isn't and you should understand the role of the judiciary in the United States or attempt to change its role if you don't like it. The whole reason we have _case law_ is because cases of higher courts make law. The legislature can then change the law if they dislike the ruling of the courts. Take the Lily Ledbetter case. SCOTUS said she couldn't sue according to how they read the law so Congress changed it. That is our process.
Has Rush been nominated to the Supreme court? or any court?
No.
Do radio or tv show hosts or any American not fit to question Sotomayor's racist statements and have to keep their comments to themselves?
I don't think so.
I don't know why the most powerful Administration in the world today is commenting on an entertainer on the radio and not other politicians but it seems weird to me.
I think that Limbaugh and his followers are both anti-Christian and anti-American. They support values that do not fit in either category. However, in contrast to the majority of the ultra-right Republicans I know, I believe in the principles of the US constitution, US Law and Christianity.
As I firm supporter of the US constitution, I say Limbaugh has the right to say what he believes, EVEN IF what he believes is in stark contrast to the US constitution and the Bible.
Don't see how you can say that. Nothing is more Anti-Christian and Anti-American than the Progressive / Liberal movement. Half of you clowns have never even bothered to listen to Limbaugh. The other half, there's no hope for anyway. I think that the same cure that the left is pushing for Israel is the one that will solve our problems, "Two State Solution". The Left and Right will never see eye to eye.
more like anti-southern-states-christian anti-southern-states-american.. didn't you know? the GOP turning hard-right -- ala Nazi movement mid 20's in Germany -- will become a local southern party only..
Problem with that is that the GOP has NOT turned hard right, but rather to the center. There could have been no more moderate candidate than John McCain. You see how well that worked out.
Well that's fallacious, that was what? 10 months ago? Besides, McCain was the ONLY electable candidate for the GOP in the general.
What is happening now is that all the moderate voices of the republican party are being shut by the shrill hard-right wing of the party, lead by Limbaugh et al.
Considering that Jesus was a Progressive / Liberal, I really have trouble understanding people who claim that being like Jesus is somehow Anti-Christian. It's like claiming all Republicans are anti-conservative.
Repub teabagging parties all over the US are lauded by neo-cons as good ol' grassroots activism ... jest like in them Revolutionary days!!
Yet Obama and Sotomayor, and basically any non-white American, are blasted for being civic minded, or for participating in community organizing, or for belonging to or supporting ... grassroots activist orgs, like Acorn or La Raza.
I can't possibly be the only person who sees this blatant hypocrisy.
She's not a racist but I think she has to explain why she ruled against family planning in the only court case about women's choice. I mean how the heck can we help the women's health in countries around the world if we have judges that rule the way she did in Center for Reproductive Law and Policy v. Bush? If she rules this way on women's health how will she rule on stem cell research?
I did read the decision and I'm still not convinced. The law that she cited as a basis for her opinion was clearly obsolete and besides we cant let these facists Republicans stand in the way of a woman's health in this country or in any country. She is after all catholic and for catholic hispanics when the Pope says jump they say "Como Alto?".
Your correct about white catholics yes but hte hispanic catholics are different. they will fall in line with whatever the pope says. I have a bad feeling that Sotomayor is one of these catholics.
That's great. That means that maybe one day they will legalize drugs or at very least that I'll continue to be able to buy my marijuana from my dealer in the future.
I actually have used coke once in my life and it was some 20 years ago when I was 14. I do smoke pot and see absolutely nothing wrong with it. Care to debate me on the war on drugs?
Oh come on Patty, thrill us with your obviously well though out descriptions of other mens penises. Purple-headed? How'd ya know that Patty? Whats purple taste like? I'm sure you know!
His or yours? You must really dwell on guys units Patty, what with your ready answers.Me personally, not so much. Don't worry tho, it seems most right wingers are conflicted about their sexuality.I dont know how you guys can run a political party out of a closet...well ,to judge by your results you can't, can you? Tsk..tsk. Gimme another opening Patty, I'm just getting warmed up.
clam chowder? no sorry tonight we only have chicken noodle and minestrone. Try pepsi throwback you'll like it, it tastes like soda used to taste. mmm mmm good
Dude, Ol' Patty is a neo-con snake charmer who wants to lure you into the mens room so he can solo on your skin flute. But he's not real bright. Give him something shiney and he'll wander away.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
They're going after the wrong part of that quote. It's not necessarily the fact that she said being a hispanic woman would make her more qualified than a white man but the fact that she thinks her "experiences" (ie poverty) would make her more qualified to judge. I think that's nonsense. It takes good legal analysis and intellect to be a decent judge, not life experiences. If everyone with hardships and struggles that 'built character' was qualified, ANYONE could be nominated.
I agree but obviously that would be a far smaller issue than racism and not enough to block her nomination with. That and the GOP are a bunch of morons.
Rush is following the path of the dead preachers, you know the type been on television/radio spews hate and yet has a flock of followers.
When they die the world breaths a breath of fresh air. And Fox has an obituary day. Not wishing Rush dead obviously just expecting it to happen sooner then later.
VIDEO:"Judge Sonia Sotomayor: Court is Where Policy is Made"
Mz. Sodomizer was caught on video accidentally showing that she legislates from the court. That is racketeering.
Such judicial activism is the Democrat's most effective tool for snuffing out self governance. With it, they pretend to abide by our republican form of democracy unless a vote goes their way, then they nullify it through such racketeering.
Of course, Obama's victory over McLiberal had nothing whatsoever to do with the 99%-Democrat media, their slobber-fest over Obama bin Liberal, or that they duped Republicans into nominating the most Liberal RINO in the pack.
Reagan was before Fox news and Limbaugh yet he somehow managed that landslide against what you might call a "100% Liberal media." What does that say about the state of modern Conservatism? What ever happened to Reagan's "the power of the right ideas brings victory?"
What happened is that Republicans ran a candidate, McLiberal, who has the WRONG ideas.
The only time during his campaign that he had any meaningful bump was when he selected a so-called "unelectable right-winger" as his running mate.
Ironically, thanks to McCain-Feingold, which criminalized the campaign funding that gave us Reagan. Thus, we can expect more media molded Liberal candidates. Good riddance to RINOs.
lol no the media isn't liberal. the media in general works off opinion polls and past voting outcomes. which simply means that the majority of americans in which they are marketing their product too are liberal.
Evidently, Liberalism is just an endless panic that reality will seep in and ruin everything.
Oh, and according to the last bipartsan Battleground Poll, most Americans consider themselves conservative. Not that your immaculate ignorance needs anything more to expose it.
You already demonstrated your inability to discriminate between "actually" and your fantasies, so your latest myth doesn't hold much weight, even without the referenced poll I provided that debunks it.
Devout Liberals & Pristine Ignorance -- Life Partners
For days now, you have attempted to refute reality and replace it with your mindless fantasy.
The fact remains that the Democrat party controls 99% of all media. That's an effective gag order against the opposition. That's the undeniable stench of fascism. That's a signature trait of totalitarian rule.
Regardless of the specific manner in which you reject reality, it still exists, and I refuse to accept that you're too stupid to recognize it.
oh im not a dem, i would have voted for ron paul or collin powell if they had the chance to go up to obama
the GOP is simply ditermined to leave no space for social liberals/ fiscal conservatives and that is why they are losing. bush one because the media painted him as a compationate concervative lol. and then you have cheney come out and essentially say f of to the moderates
Denial is a disease. Of course you would vote for RINOs. As for your nonsensical mantra, "social liberal -- fiscal conservative", it's just that. Mindlessly reciting it only evidences your rabid Leftist bent.
fact: the democrates have had a better spending record over the last 30 yrs
republicans spend more then dems with no valid method of actually paying for any of it. even the republicans have come out to say that they havent practiced what they preached. they have become a party thats only claim to conservatism is a social claim.
you are just a mindless GOP toe to line follower, you spout the baseless rhetoric just like they tell you which i guess makes you a good republican.
i would prefer low to no national social programs keeping only school financial aide and aide to the handicaped, and to have few to no laws that dictaite what i can do in my own home. that just isn't what the republicans offer, they are the party of corporate america, which you can see since almost all corporate lobbyist donate to the republicans. big business and restrictions of individuals who do not share the same personal ideologies is all they do.
99%? I refuse to think any one thinks anything is 99% PLEASE! Two of the components of Fascism is a focus on being overly patriotic and the melding of religious and govt ideals. Another is the combining of corporate and govt. interests. Why don't you try something constructive. Name calling is for the weak minded.
"overly patriotic" -- the Democrats' beloved labor price-fixing cartels lean heavily on jingoism, e.g., "Buy American"; Obama first named his vile labor-union bill the "Patriotic Employers Act"; then there's his VP calling tax hikes "patriotic"
-- CHECK.
"combining of corporate and gov't interests" -- Democrat party leaders like Frank and Dodd ferociously defended (and still do) the Fannie Fascism that just killed the world's credit markets
I would refute the abject, ignorant stupidity of your self righteous prattle, but what would be the point.
You have already made up your "lack of a mind".
What we have in the US is two corporatist parties. They both want to give away you money and mine. One on war & weapons. One on people who did not earn it.
Nothing will change as long as they can convince"the cattle"(you) to keep shouting "red team, blue team while paying no attention to the actual policies enacted.
You failed to address the point of my reply. Instead, you only posted popular Truther rhetoric. And you obviously did so entirely ignorant of the fact that it's socialist agitprop.
Yet even under that low bar, too, you fail, along with your "herd" of Alex Jones-ers. For this nation functions under a two-party system. It does so regardless of whether anyone is "shouting" about it.
Indeed, your only sign of either intelligence or education is that you boasted of refusing to offer a refutation.
There is not enough room to address the stupidity of your posts here and since you don't allow comments on your page we will just have to leave that alone.
just one comment though. Some one (you or me) is an idiot.
If Fox and Clear Channel make up 1% of the media than it must be me.
If they make up1.1% or more then admit you are misinformed, a liar, stupid, or like most of you one side idiots, a combination of these.
There are orders of magnitude more than 200 media channels, therefore, Fox and Clear channel combined are in fact much less than 1% of media, genius.
Oh, and Fox news is comprised of mostly Democrats, according to the political donations of their people.
It's not the blind, rabid devotion you demonstrate of your toxic politics that so impresses It's not even the magnitude of your immaculate ignorance that so impresses. Rather it's their infinite dimensionality.
your also quoting a ratio of funds not a out right long term support survey 99:1 ratio of contributions to Obama so it is very unaccurate to say that the media is 99% liberal outright. just that they supported obama over Mc Cain which was also the personal decision of the american people.
you also seem to disregard the fact that mc cain was supported by more big bisness lobbyist then Obama. 96 lobbyist gave funds to Mc Cain while only 26 gave to Obama.
you should also note that the media biased towards bush in 2000 with over 76% of stories about gore being negative according to the pew research center.
at the time people didn't want gore because he is equated to clinton. same reason no one wanted to vote for mc cain, he is equated to bush. it has nothing to do with a secret media bias allways in favour of the dems. the media was all behind regean aswell. the media in general supports the person that the population seems to be supporting.
Limbaugh is in his own words a "water carrier for the GOP" but AXELROD is Iindeed an operative for the filthy TROTSKYITE ZIONIST JEWS who have infested this nation. Too bad Hitler didn't have time to finish the job.
WmBurroughsTomato 2 years ago
so Rush is up for the SCOTUS right on!!!!
and here i thought it was the racist mexican
Rainsdad 2 years ago
His experience?
A politically-motivated liberal witch hunt.
TedinLasVegas 2 years ago
this was a really kool video i had fun watching it i really have to say you guys did a really good job shooting it .
Chick6517 2 years ago
Rush Limbaugh is the man.... He is a true vocal patiot! And a legend in his own time!!!
CREWCHIEF299 2 years ago
ah ah ah....... ahh
romchik88 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
search THE OBAMA DECEPTION
our dollar is on the verge of collapse
stop the New World Order
this isn't conspiracy anymore kids
know the truth!!!
ohkeepa2009 2 years ago
as long as RUsh continues to be the de facto voice of the GOP and the GOP in turn grovals at his feet the American people will continue to reject them. Rush is an extremist idiot. Repubs, take back your party, return the sanity, get with the program, stop opossing everything the Dems do (some of it is good) just to earn political points and find a new way to lead, rather than the same old tired crap America has rejected.
jamesjdm 2 years ago
Subtle attacks are good as counter-punches. But what we really need is a NO ATTACK, NO SPIN discussion of the facts. Axelrod has the winning argument here, there's no need to get personal (although Rush does the same).
RealCaptainAmerica 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ENERYONE WHO IS UNSUBSCRIBING TO FRED:
SUBSCRIBE TO ME!!! it is the transfer of subscriptions thats makes news! lets change the world!
DewtonBrothers 2 years ago
When mainstream conservatives (and Republicans) stop asking "What would Reagan/Limbaugh do?" and begin to learn how to THINK ON THEIR OWN, they may someday have some semblance of credibility. Not holding my breath . . .
RonPaulGeorgeRingo 2 years ago
Stop Christians from terrorizing America!
Antigodboy 2 years ago
rush is back doing Oxycontin that is why he is so fat and deaf.
tannersanta 2 years ago
If Rush hadn't so much money & was black, he woulda been imprisoned for a couple of years...here in Texas maybe for 10.
DillonX 2 years ago 8
Thats the truth, more like he would have been charged with intend to sell or distribute with the amount of drugs he was using, that and because Oxycontin is a narcotic and is regulated by Police, he would have gotten more than a smack on the wrist.
POOLGUY21 2 years ago
i like turkey bacon.
KiLLtheCorrUpt 2 years ago 5
Great dig, Mr. Axelrod. We all need frequent reminders of Mr. Limbaugh's assorted private gratifications.
prysmith37 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What is Axelrod trying to change the subject. rush experience with the law crap? am not the biggest Limbaugh fan.
sotomayor never had trouble with the law. Maybe, she would have trouble understanding it. sotomayor purpose in the Supreme Court is to write laws. For example, look at Rove vs Wade.
Gunrights will be attacked by her. Obama is very wicked smart.
popcur 2 years ago
His attack on Rush is irrelevant. But the primary point of SCOTUS is to clarify positions of law that are overly vague. And clarification of any type is policy making, clearly, because you are giving specificity to something that was previously vague. I fail to see why anyone has a problem with that concept. The question is how will she do that not if she will.
grenavitar 2 years ago 2
To clarify positions of law is the legislative
responsiblity. Not judges.
popcur 2 years ago
You may want that to be the case but it isn't and you should understand the role of the judiciary in the United States or attempt to change its role if you don't like it. The whole reason we have _case law_ is because cases of higher courts make law. The legislature can then change the law if they dislike the ruling of the courts. Take the Lily Ledbetter case. SCOTUS said she couldn't sue according to how they read the law so Congress changed it. That is our process.
grenavitar 2 years ago 2
It's Roe.... Karl Rove is the mouthpiece of the neocons. Got Rove on your mind?
MottJulianFanClub 2 years ago
Thanks for the correction. It's Roe vs Wade
popcur 2 years ago
Has Rush been nominated to the Supreme court? or any court?
No.
Do radio or tv show hosts or any American not fit to question Sotomayor's racist statements and have to keep their comments to themselves?
I don't think so.
I don't know why the most powerful Administration in the world today is commenting on an entertainer on the radio and not other politicians but it seems weird to me.
lees20022 2 years ago
I think that Limbaugh and his followers are both anti-Christian and anti-American. They support values that do not fit in either category. However, in contrast to the majority of the ultra-right Republicans I know, I believe in the principles of the US constitution, US Law and Christianity.
As I firm supporter of the US constitution, I say Limbaugh has the right to say what he believes, EVEN IF what he believes is in stark contrast to the US constitution and the Bible.
melreynolds61 2 years ago
Don't see how you can say that. Nothing is more Anti-Christian and Anti-American than the Progressive / Liberal movement. Half of you clowns have never even bothered to listen to Limbaugh. The other half, there's no hope for anyway. I think that the same cure that the left is pushing for Israel is the one that will solve our problems, "Two State Solution". The Left and Right will never see eye to eye.
wareaglealum 2 years ago
more like anti-southern-states-christian anti-southern-states-american.. didn't you know? the GOP turning hard-right -- ala Nazi movement mid 20's in Germany -- will become a local southern party only..
s4life 2 years ago
Problem with that is that the GOP has NOT turned hard right, but rather to the center. There could have been no more moderate candidate than John McCain. You see how well that worked out.
wareaglealum 2 years ago 2
"Problem with that is that the GOP has NOT turned hard right"
You are advocating extremism? I thought our war in the Middle East was about eradicating extremism?
Theopolitical 2 years ago
Well that's fallacious, that was what? 10 months ago? Besides, McCain was the ONLY electable candidate for the GOP in the general.
What is happening now is that all the moderate voices of the republican party are being shut by the shrill hard-right wing of the party, lead by Limbaugh et al.
s4life 2 years ago 2
Considering that Jesus was a Progressive / Liberal, I really have trouble understanding people who claim that being like Jesus is somehow Anti-Christian. It's like claiming all Republicans are anti-conservative.
melreynolds61 2 years ago
tho republicans are anti-conservative in practice. the only conservative quality they attempt to stick to is social conservatisim.
TheEvolver311 2 years ago
Repub teabagging parties all over the US are lauded by neo-cons as good ol' grassroots activism ... jest like in them Revolutionary days!!
Yet Obama and Sotomayor, and basically any non-white American, are blasted for being civic minded, or for participating in community organizing, or for belonging to or supporting ... grassroots activist orgs, like Acorn or La Raza.
I can't possibly be the only person who sees this blatant hypocrisy.
tonycapricorny 2 years ago 7
Take a Towtruck to pull that pig outta his stye. Goddam dope-fiend that he is.
gobee53 2 years ago
Oh now you're just making yourself look silly.
Again.
integral 2 years ago
She's not a racist but I think she has to explain why she ruled against family planning in the only court case about women's choice. I mean how the heck can we help the women's health in countries around the world if we have judges that rule the way she did in Center for Reproductive Law and Policy v. Bush? If she rules this way on women's health how will she rule on stem cell research?
megamaniac76 2 years ago
Just read the decision.
integral 2 years ago
I did read the decision and I'm still not convinced. The law that she cited as a basis for her opinion was clearly obsolete and besides we cant let these facists Republicans stand in the way of a woman's health in this country or in any country. She is after all catholic and for catholic hispanics when the Pope says jump they say "Como Alto?".
megamaniac76 2 years ago
Hmmm. Being a lapsed RC myself I've noticed that US Catholics aren't quite so locked into the Vatican as you might think.
And yes, I'm going to hell :)
integral 2 years ago
Your correct about white catholics yes but hte hispanic catholics are different. they will fall in line with whatever the pope says. I have a bad feeling that Sotomayor is one of these catholics.
megamaniac76 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Obama and Drug Czar Joe Biden's daughter are both confirmed coke sniffers.
patsagainstrats 2 years ago
That's great. That means that maybe one day they will legalize drugs or at very least that I'll continue to be able to buy my marijuana from my dealer in the future.
exacerbatedtaboo 2 years ago
I bet you'd like to snort a nice, fat line off Obama's purple-headed black snake.
patsagainstrats 2 years ago
I actually have used coke once in my life and it was some 20 years ago when I was 14. I do smoke pot and see absolutely nothing wrong with it. Care to debate me on the war on drugs?
exacerbatedtaboo 2 years ago
No.
patsagainstrats 2 years ago
Oh come on Patty, thrill us with your obviously well though out descriptions of other mens penises. Purple-headed? How'd ya know that Patty? Whats purple taste like? I'm sure you know!
gobee53 2 years ago
I would assume it matches his lips.
patsagainstrats 2 years ago
His or yours? You must really dwell on guys units Patty, what with your ready answers.Me personally, not so much. Don't worry tho, it seems most right wingers are conflicted about their sexuality.I dont know how you guys can run a political party out of a closet...well ,to judge by your results you can't, can you? Tsk..tsk. Gimme another opening Patty, I'm just getting warmed up.
gobee53 2 years ago
hahaha
dejahthoris 2 years ago
I feel ya bro.
I drink coke like an addict, and I use my pot to make clam chowder all the time!
k166a 2 years ago
clam chowder? no sorry tonight we only have chicken noodle and minestrone. Try pepsi throwback you'll like it, it tastes like soda used to taste. mmm mmm good
daderone 2 years ago
Dude, Ol' Patty is a neo-con snake charmer who wants to lure you into the mens room so he can solo on your skin flute. But he's not real bright. Give him something shiney and he'll wander away.
gobee53 2 years ago 2
you like thinking about that sort of thing don't you patsagainst?
daderone 2 years ago
Larry Sinclair-style.
patsagainstrats 2 years ago
"Obama and Drug Czar Joe Biden's daughter are both confirmed coke sniffers"
Guess that is what Obama meant when he speaks of bipartisanship and mutual interest with the cokeheads in the conservative movement.
ipbalkenende 2 years ago
Bam!!! 800 pound gorilla.
appatel 2 years ago
Limbaugh bahahahahahaha
That fat fuck. ann coulter should give him some pitty pussy so he can stfu
3star2nr 2 years ago 4
What and ruin her/his virginity?
Mychaels 2 years ago
HAHAHAHA
Jabba the rush. his dick probably shriveld away anyway
3star2nr 2 years ago
limbaugh is gay?
daderone 2 years ago
fucking white people
UltraBibendum 2 years ago
what did i do?
sharinganclan213 2 years ago
Past your bedtime lil' Troller.
gobee53 2 years ago
Whoa, what a devastating blow to Limbaugh credibility, the only thing missing was the references to Oxicontin.
Too bad it is Friday, so Limbaugh rebuttal until Monday .
JerezJulio 2 years ago 2
Oxy =p
micahgee 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
They're going after the wrong part of that quote. It's not necessarily the fact that she said being a hispanic woman would make her more qualified than a white man but the fact that she thinks her "experiences" (ie poverty) would make her more qualified to judge. I think that's nonsense. It takes good legal analysis and intellect to be a decent judge, not life experiences. If everyone with hardships and struggles that 'built character' was qualified, ANYONE could be nominated.
whoo689 2 years ago
good point
1samothrace77 2 years ago
Hey, but it was said, too, by Alito and Thomas that I've seen in the last 48 hours.
It's standard nomination-speak seen more recently from the RIGHT and APPLAUDED by REPUGS.
camlerer 2 years ago
@whoo
I agree but obviously that would be a far smaller issue than racism and not enough to block her nomination with. That and the GOP are a bunch of morons.
ipbalkenende 2 years ago
Axelrod could get OJ Simpson elected. He's THAT good
WKaliberr 2 years ago 4
'Limbaugh has his own issues with the law"....good one Axelrod, and you said it with sincerity, I almost thought you felt sorry for him...lol
hajqbvii 2 years ago 5
put in 'experieces' instead of' 'issues'...goofed
hajqbvii 2 years ago
Douche Limpdick.... I hope this sad creature in neutered so his idiot gene is not passed on to another generation.
SabuPtolemy 2 years ago 3
I don't think we have to worry about Limbaugh procreating..
For obvious reasons.
F33bs 2 years ago
Rush Limbaugh... and I thought his shows were mind numbing!
PersonalJesus348 2 years ago
LOL
Axelrod 21
limppole 0
game over
KataVideo 2 years ago 4
Zing!
allenjmu 2 years ago 6
appropriate? have you ever heard of Limbaugh?
danthemango 2 years ago
Rush Limbaugh never got off of oxycotin, that's why he has half a brain, is deaf, and has failing kidneys. He won't be missed.
sabboth42 2 years ago
Rush is following the path of the dead preachers, you know the type been on television/radio spews hate and yet has a flock of followers.
When they die the world breaths a breath of fresh air. And Fox has an obituary day. Not wishing Rush dead obviously just expecting it to happen sooner then later.
masticina 2 years ago 3
Ad hominem doesn't change the facts.
VIDEO:"Judge Sonia Sotomayor: Court is Where Policy is Made"
Mz. Sodomizer was caught on video accidentally showing that she legislates from the court. That is racketeering.
Such judicial activism is the Democrat's most effective tool for snuffing out self governance. With it, they pretend to abide by our republican form of democracy unless a vote goes their way, then they nullify it through such racketeering.
TylerNull 2 years ago
Axelrod is the man... Smart the reason Obama won in a landslide
Lamarmusizz 2 years ago 4
Of course, Obama's victory over McLiberal had nothing whatsoever to do with the 99%-Democrat media, their slobber-fest over Obama bin Liberal, or that they duped Republicans into nominating the most Liberal RINO in the pack.
Oh, and "Landslide"?
Reagan w/ 525 -- YES
Obama w/ 365 -- NO
TylerNull 2 years ago
What about your last Republican win was it a landslide? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Lamarmusizz 2 years ago
Mocking your own failed contrivance isn't much of a rebuttal.
TylerNull 2 years ago
Poor conservatives never will be in power
Lamarmusizz 2 years ago
Reagan was before Fox news and Limbaugh yet he somehow managed that landslide against what you might call a "100% Liberal media." What does that say about the state of modern Conservatism? What ever happened to Reagan's "the power of the right ideas brings victory?"
BiffWebster100 2 years ago
What happened is that Republicans ran a candidate, McLiberal, who has the WRONG ideas.
The only time during his campaign that he had any meaningful bump was when he selected a so-called "unelectable right-winger" as his running mate.
Ironically, thanks to McCain-Feingold, which criminalized the campaign funding that gave us Reagan. Thus, we can expect more media molded Liberal candidates. Good riddance to RINOs.
(And the media is about 99% Democrat, not 100%.)
TylerNull 2 years ago
lol no the media isn't liberal. the media in general works off opinion polls and past voting outcomes. which simply means that the majority of americans in which they are marketing their product too are liberal.
TheEvolver311 2 years ago
One hundred to one
ONE HUNDRED to ONE
One HUNDRED to 1
"Putting Money Where Mouths Are: Media Donations Favor DEMs 100-1" -- Investors Business Daily, 23 July 2008
Proselytize your idiocies to your bottom-feeding comrades.
TylerNull 2 years ago
it coudn't simply a have been that the public is more liberal. no the republicans need to have a conspiracy as to why they couldn't win.
investors business daily the anti-global warming anti-peak oil rag, oh it isn't biased.
TheEvolver311 2 years ago
99%?
Evidently, Liberalism is just an endless panic that reality will seep in and ruin everything.
Oh, and according to the last bipartsan Battleground Poll, most Americans consider themselves conservative. Not that your immaculate ignorance needs anything more to expose it.
TylerNull 2 years ago
actually the majority are independent nonaffiliated
TheEvolver311 2 years ago
You already demonstrated your inability to discriminate between "actually" and your fantasies, so your latest myth doesn't hold much weight, even without the referenced poll I provided that debunks it.
Devout Liberals & Pristine Ignorance -- Life Partners
TylerNull 2 years ago
and siting a conservative newspaper is unbiased how?
american conservatives & racial,sexual,and cultural bigotry--together forever
TheEvolver311 2 years ago
The number of news sources that Liberals must dismiss in order to cling to their mythologies just keeps growing and growing and growing and ...
TylerNull 2 years ago
i take a newspaper that was conceived as a easier to read version of the wall street journal as obviously right wing.
TheEvolver311 2 years ago
i take your aggressive rejection of reality as obviously left wing.
TylerNull 2 years ago
whatever you have nothing valid or insightfull to say, you wanna sit and make personal insults at people to prove your points then go on with that.
im only a social liberal, im a fiscal center-right. it is just unfortunate that the the dems are more fiscally concervative then the GOP.
TheEvolver311 2 years ago
"you have nothing valid or insightfull "
I have observable, referenced fact. Contrarily, you have stubborn ignorance, derision, and posing as a victim.
TylerNull 2 years ago
you gave a bias opinion poll of the readers of a right wing newspaper
not at all a fact
TheEvolver311 2 years ago
Spewing more mythology -- five posts of the stuff -- doesn't make it any less so.
TylerNull 2 years ago
most of that came from the article you sited
TheEvolver311 2 years ago
pew research polls are hardly mythology
TheEvolver311 2 years ago
For days now, you have attempted to refute reality and replace it with your mindless fantasy.
The fact remains that the Democrat party controls 99% of all media. That's an effective gag order against the opposition. That's the undeniable stench of fascism. That's a signature trait of totalitarian rule.
Regardless of the specific manner in which you reject reality, it still exists, and I refuse to accept that you're too stupid to recognize it.
TylerNull 2 years ago
lol your article reference doesn't even try to state that
the real myth is the myth created by the GOP that the libs controll the media
TheEvolver311 2 years ago
That's the fun of sticking reality right up against the snout of a rabid Democrat. We get to chronicle the specific manner in which they reject it.
TylerNull 2 years ago
oh im not a dem, i would have voted for ron paul or collin powell if they had the chance to go up to obama
the GOP is simply ditermined to leave no space for social liberals/ fiscal conservatives and that is why they are losing. bush one because the media painted him as a compationate concervative lol. and then you have cheney come out and essentially say f of to the moderates
all im saying is that your claim is false
TheEvolver311 2 years ago
"oh im not a dem"
Denial is a disease. Of course you would vote for RINOs. As for your nonsensical mantra, "social liberal -- fiscal conservative", it's just that. Mindlessly reciting it only evidences your rabid Leftist bent.
TylerNull 2 years ago
fact: the democrates have had a better spending record over the last 30 yrs
republicans spend more then dems with no valid method of actually paying for any of it. even the republicans have come out to say that they havent practiced what they preached. they have become a party thats only claim to conservatism is a social claim.
you are just a mindless GOP toe to line follower, you spout the baseless rhetoric just like they tell you which i guess makes you a good republican.
TheEvolver311 2 years ago
i would prefer low to no national social programs keeping only school financial aide and aide to the handicaped, and to have few to no laws that dictaite what i can do in my own home. that just isn't what the republicans offer, they are the party of corporate america, which you can see since almost all corporate lobbyist donate to the republicans. big business and restrictions of individuals who do not share the same personal ideologies is all they do.
TheEvolver311 2 years ago
Your endless recitals of Democrat party mythology don't make them any less a lie.
The larger the corporation, the more government established barriers to entry they can errect, the more money goes to the Democrat party.
Obama's crew actually held up the so-called emergency bailout until the executive pay of AIG and such were explicitly protected.
The fact that you view corporations as the enemy and government as the savior is yet another bit of evidence of your rabid Leftist bent.
TylerNull 2 years ago
so when republicans confess to not being fiscially conservative, they were really puppet democrates? they said it about them selves you idiot.
TheEvolver311 2 years ago
99%? I refuse to think any one thinks anything is 99% PLEASE! Two of the components of Fascism is a focus on being overly patriotic and the melding of religious and govt ideals. Another is the combining of corporate and govt. interests. Why don't you try something constructive. Name calling is for the weak minded.
finerbiner 2 years ago
"overly patriotic" -- the Democrats' beloved labor price-fixing cartels lean heavily on jingoism, e.g., "Buy American"; Obama first named his vile labor-union bill the "Patriotic Employers Act"; then there's his VP calling tax hikes "patriotic"
-- CHECK.
"combining of corporate and gov't interests" -- Democrat party leaders like Frank and Dodd ferociously defended (and still do) the Fannie Fascism that just killed the world's credit markets
-- CHECK.
LIBERAL FASCISM.
Next?
TylerNull 2 years ago
TylerNull
I would refute the abject, ignorant stupidity of your self righteous prattle, but what would be the point.
You have already made up your "lack of a mind".
What we have in the US is two corporatist parties. They both want to give away you money and mine. One on war & weapons. One on people who did not earn it.
Nothing will change as long as they can convince"the cattle"(you) to keep shouting "red team, blue team while paying no attention to the actual policies enacted.
finerbiner 2 years ago
You failed to address the point of my reply. Instead, you only posted popular Truther rhetoric. And you obviously did so entirely ignorant of the fact that it's socialist agitprop.
Yet even under that low bar, too, you fail, along with your "herd" of Alex Jones-ers. For this nation functions under a two-party system. It does so regardless of whether anyone is "shouting" about it.
Indeed, your only sign of either intelligence or education is that you boasted of refusing to offer a refutation.
TylerNull 2 years ago
There is not enough room to address the stupidity of your posts here and since you don't allow comments on your page we will just have to leave that alone.
just one comment though. Some one (you or me) is an idiot.
If Fox and Clear Channel make up 1% of the media than it must be me.
If they make up1.1% or more then admit you are misinformed, a liar, stupid, or like most of you one side idiots, a combination of these.
finerbiner 2 years ago
There are orders of magnitude more than 200 media channels, therefore, Fox and Clear channel combined are in fact much less than 1% of media, genius.
Oh, and Fox news is comprised of mostly Democrats, according to the political donations of their people.
It's not the blind, rabid devotion you demonstrate of your toxic politics that so impresses It's not even the magnitude of your immaculate ignorance that so impresses. Rather it's their infinite dimensionality.
But keep not-responding.
TylerNull 2 years ago
your also quoting a ratio of funds not a out right long term support survey 99:1 ratio of contributions to Obama so it is very unaccurate to say that the media is 99% liberal outright. just that they supported obama over Mc Cain which was also the personal decision of the american people.
TheEvolver311 2 years ago
you also seem to disregard the fact that mc cain was supported by more big bisness lobbyist then Obama. 96 lobbyist gave funds to Mc Cain while only 26 gave to Obama.
TheEvolver311 2 years ago
you should also note that the media biased towards bush in 2000 with over 76% of stories about gore being negative according to the pew research center.
at the time people didn't want gore because he is equated to clinton. same reason no one wanted to vote for mc cain, he is equated to bush. it has nothing to do with a secret media bias allways in favour of the dems. the media was all behind regean aswell. the media in general supports the person that the population seems to be supporting.
TheEvolver311 2 years ago
mc cain offered no new idea's, and obviously the majority wasn't in favour of a similar too bush game plan.
republicans are just butt hurt they lose, they are sore losers.
TheEvolver311 2 years ago