This stock? My 2.4 swapped neon is much quicker.. this ain't to bad tho like the sound.. watch my vids.. my old sohc neon was lil faster than this I believe too..
I was going to comment saying how my 1.8 Ford Mondeo was as quick as this but then I realised this only has 140HP? Is that right? My Mondeo has done 155,000 miles and is 125HP standard, but I've remapped the ECU so it SHOULD in an ideal world be putting out 133HP.. I'm surprised this is as quick as mine now that I realise it only had 140HP standard and what with it having 200K on the clock. Isn't it pretty heavy too?
@MGK1992 btw the 2.3HO quad4 is stronger than that 3.1 so technically its impossible that you took a beretta GTZ with a z24 if u had him there is two thing that could make you win, either he dont know how to drive or his engine was frickin tired or not in shape and not well keep, the 2.3 is 180 hp 185 ft-lb of torque or so , that 3.1 is 140 hp 185 ft-lb of torque, and also, the z24 is heavier because of that big v6, but that v6 is way stronger than the 2.3, 2.3hO was less reliable.
@Dii4I3Lo i will race you man i got a 2.2 cavy but i dont do a strait line bull shit im a back road racer in my cavy power isnt everything unless you got the suspension too keep up
@MGK1992 but if your talking about the 2.4 Quad4 that was not in any beretta gtz but in sunfire and cavalier from 95 to 02 , then, its possible that you took them
@Motorfordtoyota yeah this car is now 3400 swapped out of a 2000 Grand Am GT, ill make videos of it real soon ive just been busy with this new trans am ws6 i got... haha
@MGK1992 it depends i had a 90 z24 with a three speed auto and i remember hitting 119 with out problem , and i never did anything on it, too bad i blew the engine
@MGK1992 Mostly true but not always. I have a 2002 Chevy Cavalier LS Sport coupe automatic. In first I do 35, then 2nd at 70mph, and 3rd all the way to 110mph while the 5 speed in this video needed 4th to get to 110 and I dont. Thats when I speed shift it (1-2-3-D). It technically has 5 gears if you think about. 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 3rd Overdrive, Drive, and 4th. A mechanic said that mine is a 4speed auto even though it only says 1, 2, 3, D. For the most part, you are right though.
@nathenandrew No real overdrive. It's called "lockup". It has a solenoid that locks up the torque converter in thirrd gear and doesn't allow it to slip like normal... as kind of a faux overdrive. This "lockup" solenoid wears out and sticks in lockup mode, and then it will not downshift as you slow. It feels like somebody is pushing you. Have to let it cool down until it unlocks, or Limp home mode is to disconnect electrical connector to solenoid where it goes into the trans cover.
@fordxbgtfalcon they did it with V6 2.8 and they changed to V6 3.1 in 1990 until 1994 , in 1995 they changed the model and the engine , the 3.1 V6 was replaced with a 2.4 Twin Cam developing 150 hp and 140 or 150 ft-lb of torque , that V6 originally came with 140hp and 185 ft-lb of torque the 2.8 was the same engine as 3.1 except with a decreased stroke, i got a 1993 Cavalier Z24 5spd, with 300 000km still running good, but i dont know if i as fast as you, hard to say since my speedo is in KM
Yea this brings back memories of my 94 z24 5 speed. You got to luv that torque in 1st gear! Not many econo boxes could hang with that launch. Seems like that engine was slightly underated. Also had an 88 Z with the digital dash. Fun cars to drive...
What still impresses me is the car's ability to pass over other cars even on an uphill road, despite its age. That v6 was not as powerful as other more modern l4s by the time, but it has a damn good torque. I know what I'm telling you since I learned to drive on a 5 speed rs v6
@cluless87mx Holy shit! it can pass slower cars uphill??!!! wow!!! for a v6 the power sucks. 140hp and 180tq.(45 hp per liter) a 93 maxima SE featured a 3.0L making 190hp.(63hp per liter) slightly smaller engine with 50 more hp. hell a stock 93 altima with a 2.4L makes 155hp and 160tq.(64hp per liter) For some reason GM still doesn't understand this whole Overhead Camshaft thing.... Hell by 93 even Ford had DOHC engines. Such as my DOHC 4.6 (60hp per liter)
@svtlincoln The secret is (or used to be) in the low range. Most newer cars need to be revved up to get a significant torque. This one had a very broad torque range attached to a 5sp manual. They made such a nice job together! Just to give you an idea, look up for "cumbres de maltrata subida" here on youtube. Only thing is most videos are by truckers and in spanish (I wish youtube existed back then). There´s a good vid by this user: "samyarturo", and another one by "pollov5" as well. Cheers!
oh well my brother had a 92 2.2 5spd and it ran a 16.6 @ 82mph with just an intake and aftermarket muffler and since yours is a 94 its got the 120hp 4 cylinder instead of the 110hp one so im guessing at the very best you might be able to hit a 16.5 or 16.4 with a good launch...
yea... Mines not a z24 though.. I want one, but i'm plenty happy with the cavy I have now. Not much done to it but the exhaust, a K&N filter, and NO catalytic converter (Took out the honeycomb). Sounds great though and runs like a champ. I'd have to say mine may only run high 16's. But great low end torque! =P
i love these cars as well, i have not timed mine yet.... but i cant wait to and ill post it up soon... The hell with what other dorks say about cavaliers... wether there fast or not they are GREAT running cars!!!! and still quick =P
oh yeah i agree, this car now has 221,000 miles and its still goin! i plan on buying a nitrous kit for it for really cheap and seeing what it can do with a 50 shot since i plan on swapping in the 3400SFI V6 soon haha...
aem cai and around 68,xxxx miles. i have a vid of my car doing a 0-100 run, but that was stock, i'll try to get an updated vid with the cai soon. going to the track again and hopefully can pull off a better time with it being winter now.
i owed 5 z24s in my life and have 2 still main Fact governor at 115 2.8 v6 1988 top speed 119. 1989 top speed 127 3.1 v6 1990 tru 94 top speed 132 auto 134 5speed
hey 93 v6 mustang against a 93 v6 cavalier the cavalier would win. i know. i did it. :) v6s aint gonna always have the power a v8 would have. so ofcourse his car is slow if you drive a v8. and actually on an automatic the car will go to 113 mph before the governor kicks in.
@MrShinerunner23 another thing that favors the Chevy over the mustang is its relative light weight. You should also consider the gear ratios vs the respective torque curve each car has. I have no clue how it is like in the mustang, but the gm´s v6 attached to that Muncie-Getrag trans. do really kick ass!
thats as fast as mine is i have a 93 rs 3.1 and its pretty fast but i can take mine a lil past 110 and that ford guy is full of it i seen his video and hes not really fast go chevy
@rudolphna54 My 90 Z24 had 280,000 on it when I sold it, and it'd still burn the front tires on takeoff... and it was an automatic with original engine and trans... If Chevy wants to get back in the game, they should re-make those cars
Gotta say I'd rather have my old 94 Auto Z24 3.1 than my current Escort GT 5 spd. The Cavalier has so much classic styling almost muscle car like. At least the V6 doesn't stupid when the muffler falls off. Ug take a look at my vids for an embarrassing vid of no exhaust on a 4 banger.
haha not a bad sounding escort... i drove my z24 with open downpipe for awhile and it seriously sounded like a V8 350 and it screamed at when i floored it lol.
It's not quite so much a loss of power as it is gearing. Obviously, the 5-speed has 2 extra gears over the 3-speed auto and has shorter gearing, allowing for better acceleration. Plus, the old 3.1's are all low-end and lack any top-end power. I used to drive a '92 Lumina base model with the 3.1 and 3-speed and it wasn't helped much that it had to hold out the gears for so long (which also meant running high up the RPM range longer than in the 5-speed, meaning a loss of power).
My Grand Prix is slower than your cavalier, 3.1l on a light body is sweet, the prix isn't that heavy, yet it needs spunk!! Nice accelaration with your car BTW.
@darren107 ive raced a couple stock 5.0 mustangs, one of them was a 5spd and one was an Auto but i was almost dead even with the 5spd but he got me once we got to about 85mph and i beat the Auto by a tiny bit...
Theres no way a 16 second car can beat a 13 second car, i've owned a 94 z24 and a 94 mustang gt with the 5.0 and the mustang kills it every which way. @MGK1992
Nice man, wish my Z24 was a stick, but I get to 110 too, just a hair behind you though. I've been told that these cars can do a burnout through 3rd gear with the manual gear box. Nice video and thanks for watching mine. 5 *****
it's actually 108. urs is a 93. maybe 94
owenpls 2 months ago
YO TENGO UNO ESTAN CHIDOSS SON LOS MEJORES
saviany89 2 months ago
This stock? My 2.4 swapped neon is much quicker.. this ain't to bad tho like the sound.. watch my vids.. my old sohc neon was lil faster than this I believe too..
96greon 3 months ago
<3 the 3.1 sound
falaqdad15 3 months ago
loaf
tysmd12345 4 months ago
Just get another 3.1 and work on that! You cannot beat those 3.1L. I had a 2.8L in my 87 Buick century RIP :(
josh1303 5 months ago
@josh1303 yes u can. 3.4
rcjg24 4 months ago
I had a Z24 2.4 L omg that engine was so powerfull I mean it could of taken over m taurus v6. good good engines they have!!
XoXKyleXXX 6 months ago
My 3rd gen 2.2 ecotec will walk on any old cavi
FordHaten 7 months ago
sounds yummy
falaqdad15 9 months ago
I was going to comment saying how my 1.8 Ford Mondeo was as quick as this but then I realised this only has 140HP? Is that right? My Mondeo has done 155,000 miles and is 125HP standard, but I've remapped the ECU so it SHOULD in an ideal world be putting out 133HP.. I'm surprised this is as quick as mine now that I realise it only had 140HP standard and what with it having 200K on the clock. Isn't it pretty heavy too?
Zlyzer 11 months ago
@Zlyzer yeah but 180tq at a close rpm range that makes the car quick (more tq then hp)
Jaygeta1 10 months ago
Damn, thats pretty good, Ive got a Sunbird GT with a 3.1 and a five speed, and I am inpressed
65novadude 1 year ago
Fuck the quad4, I want a 3.1!
Motorfordtoyota 1 year ago 15
@Motorfordtoyota yeah i beat a Beretta GTZ with the Quad 4, it was a close race but i got him...
MGK1992 1 year ago 2
@MGK1992 Just cant beat the 3.1 reliability and sound! Plus a 5 speed, awsome!
Motorfordtoyota 1 year ago
@MGK1992 btw the 2.3HO quad4 is stronger than that 3.1 so technically its impossible that you took a beretta GTZ with a z24 if u had him there is two thing that could make you win, either he dont know how to drive or his engine was frickin tired or not in shape and not well keep, the 2.3 is 180 hp 185 ft-lb of torque or so , that 3.1 is 140 hp 185 ft-lb of torque, and also, the z24 is heavier because of that big v6, but that v6 is way stronger than the 2.3, 2.3hO was less reliable.
exeat5 1 year ago
@exeat5 el 2.3 era de 140 hp y 155 lb-pie ok. no digas tonterias
kunulises 1 year ago
@exeat5
Your a fucking joke !
You state the 2.4( wait sorry 2.3 according to your dumbass) is more powerful then the 3.1L but the 3.1L is heavier yet stronger?
WTF is going on in that little hamster wheel of a brain?
Take your head out of your ass before you make any post.
I have a 3.1L pushing 240TQ to the wheel, N / A
Sitting in my garage ready to go,
Fuck your gen III Cav's
Nothing but a fucking disgrace.
Dii4I3Lo 1 year ago
@Dii4I3Lo i will race you man i got a 2.2 cavy but i dont do a strait line bull shit im a back road racer in my cavy power isnt everything unless you got the suspension too keep up
TManAmes692 11 months ago
@MGK1992 but if your talking about the 2.4 Quad4 that was not in any beretta gtz but in sunfire and cavalier from 95 to 02 , then, its possible that you took them
exeat5 1 year ago
@MGK1992 race my gtz plz
w41king 1 year ago
@MGK1992 yeah thats why i love the z24 with a 3.1 what a tourqe monster
Jaygeta1 10 months ago
@Jaygeta1 lol 185lb/ft isn't a torque monster dumbass
mustangmikeca 10 months ago
@mustangmikeca u got alot to learn
Jaygeta1 8 months ago
@mustangmikeca that's why you are a mustang fag right lol
Jaygeta1 3 months ago
@MGK1992 some how i doubt that, i have a 3100 and it wouldnt stand a chance against a quad.there definantly had to be something wrong with it.
maddogy1d 4 months ago
@Motorfordtoyota lol stock for stock the quad 4 will win so you know the 1988 grand am will beat the 3.1
w41king 1 year ago
@w41king Yeah, but stock for stock, the 3.1 will last about 3.5 million years longer.
Motorfordtoyota 1 year ago
@Motorfordtoyota ok if you put it that way you got me
w41king 1 year ago
@Motorfordtoyota u want the 3.4 swap
rcjg24 4 months ago
@rcjg24 3.4s arent as reliable as 3.1 MPFI.
Motorfordtoyota 4 months ago
@Motorfordtoyota yeah this car is now 3400 swapped out of a 2000 Grand Am GT, ill make videos of it real soon ive just been busy with this new trans am ws6 i got... haha
MGK1992 4 months ago
@Motorfordtoyota
The Quads are powerful, but unreliable. I'd take a 3.1 MPFI over one anyday.
bgoins12 2 months ago
how does the car hold up at 110 because i haven't had enough distance for me to hit that high
joeyjord4life 1 year ago
i could only get my moms old 94 z24 to about 98 - 100 in this time but hers was an auto
wallen2k9 1 year ago
@wallen2k9 yeah the autos kill all the power cuz their only a 3spd.
MGK1992 1 year ago
@MGK1992 it depends i had a 90 z24 with a three speed auto and i remember hitting 119 with out problem , and i never did anything on it, too bad i blew the engine
o well
Miamiz24 1 year ago
@MGK1992 Mostly true but not always. I have a 2002 Chevy Cavalier LS Sport coupe automatic. In first I do 35, then 2nd at 70mph, and 3rd all the way to 110mph while the 5 speed in this video needed 4th to get to 110 and I dont. Thats when I speed shift it (1-2-3-D). It technically has 5 gears if you think about. 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 3rd Overdrive, Drive, and 4th. A mechanic said that mine is a 4speed auto even though it only says 1, 2, 3, D. For the most part, you are right though.
nsrailfann4life91 1 year ago
@MGK1992 my cavy is auto but five speed unless your talking about the old z24 cavaliers
TManAmes692 11 months ago
@MGK1992 HAHAHA what a pos!
prosurfer2222 11 months ago
se forzan pero se icieron para correr 110mph o 200 km/h
scoobydoo2902 9 months ago
@MGK1992 4 spd, 3+overdrive
nathenandrew 1 month ago
@nathenandrew No real overdrive. It's called "lockup". It has a solenoid that locks up the torque converter in thirrd gear and doesn't allow it to slip like normal... as kind of a faux overdrive. This "lockup" solenoid wears out and sticks in lockup mode, and then it will not downshift as you slow. It feels like somebody is pushing you. Have to let it cool down until it unlocks, or Limp home mode is to disconnect electrical connector to solenoid where it goes into the trans cover.
JetMechMA 1 week ago
that is actually not bad man, pretyy fast dude
XuleGua 1 year ago
very fasttt!!! nicee man!!!
xbizkit18 1 year ago
wow, i never knew they made a z24 with a v6? thought they were all 4 bangers? shows what I know, lol
fordxbgtfalcon 1 year ago
@fordxbgtfalcon they did it with V6 2.8 and they changed to V6 3.1 in 1990 until 1994 , in 1995 they changed the model and the engine , the 3.1 V6 was replaced with a 2.4 Twin Cam developing 150 hp and 140 or 150 ft-lb of torque , that V6 originally came with 140hp and 185 ft-lb of torque the 2.8 was the same engine as 3.1 except with a decreased stroke, i got a 1993 Cavalier Z24 5spd, with 300 000km still running good, but i dont know if i as fast as you, hard to say since my speedo is in KM
exeat5 1 year ago
that bitch is gonna blow
djbas5309 1 year ago
i cant believe its a V6 calalier
eryonne2468 1 year ago
Yea this brings back memories of my 94 z24 5 speed. You got to luv that torque in 1st gear! Not many econo boxes could hang with that launch. Seems like that engine was slightly underated. Also had an 88 Z with the digital dash. Fun cars to drive...
nimbledagreat 1 year ago
@nimbledagreat oh yeah i love this car and i plan to keep it for awhile because i never get sick of driving it lol
MGK1992 1 year ago
What still impresses me is the car's ability to pass over other cars even on an uphill road, despite its age. That v6 was not as powerful as other more modern l4s by the time, but it has a damn good torque. I know what I'm telling you since I learned to drive on a 5 speed rs v6
cluless87mx 1 year ago
@cluless87mx Holy shit! it can pass slower cars uphill??!!! wow!!! for a v6 the power sucks. 140hp and 180tq.(45 hp per liter) a 93 maxima SE featured a 3.0L making 190hp.(63hp per liter) slightly smaller engine with 50 more hp. hell a stock 93 altima with a 2.4L makes 155hp and 160tq.(64hp per liter) For some reason GM still doesn't understand this whole Overhead Camshaft thing.... Hell by 93 even Ford had DOHC engines. Such as my DOHC 4.6 (60hp per liter)
svtlincoln 1 year ago
@svtlincoln The secret is (or used to be) in the low range. Most newer cars need to be revved up to get a significant torque. This one had a very broad torque range attached to a 5sp manual. They made such a nice job together! Just to give you an idea, look up for "cumbres de maltrata subida" here on youtube. Only thing is most videos are by truckers and in spanish (I wish youtube existed back then). There´s a good vid by this user: "samyarturo", and another one by "pollov5" as well. Cheers!
cluless87mx 1 year ago 2
nice. try not to shift so hard though. ease into it.
Asakura9109 1 year ago
and the car are stock?
boody92 2 years ago
@boody92 yes its stock besides an aftermarket air filter which doesnt do much.
MGK1992 2 years ago
yeah like one or two horsepower but they sure sound cool
midgetmayo 1 year ago
You start in the second gear or what ?
boody92 2 years ago
no i definitely started in first gear, didnt even need to hit 5th gear...
MGK1992 2 years ago
It's a 1994, 2.2 L, 5 spd manual. Same car as the black one i have in my favorite videos. capt mines blue and needs a little touch up. lol
TonySanders94Cavy 2 years ago
oh well my brother had a 92 2.2 5spd and it ran a 16.6 @ 82mph with just an intake and aftermarket muffler and since yours is a 94 its got the 120hp 4 cylinder instead of the 110hp one so im guessing at the very best you might be able to hit a 16.5 or 16.4 with a good launch...
MGK1992 2 years ago
yea... Mines not a z24 though.. I want one, but i'm plenty happy with the cavy I have now. Not much done to it but the exhaust, a K&N filter, and NO catalytic converter (Took out the honeycomb). Sounds great though and runs like a champ. I'd have to say mine may only run high 16's. But great low end torque! =P
TonySanders94Cavy 2 years ago
is yours a 4cyl or V6? 5spd or auto? i could tell u exactly what u would run...
MGK1992 2 years ago
i love these cars as well, i have not timed mine yet.... but i cant wait to and ill post it up soon... The hell with what other dorks say about cavaliers... wether there fast or not they are GREAT running cars!!!! and still quick =P
TonySanders94Cavy 2 years ago
oh yeah i agree, this car now has 221,000 miles and its still goin! i plan on buying a nitrous kit for it for really cheap and seeing what it can do with a 50 shot since i plan on swapping in the 3400SFI V6 soon haha...
MGK1992 2 years ago
I have a 1994 Z24, fastest ive ever gotten it up was around 130.....
hardyea 2 years ago
what do you 60' in the quarter?
linoleumshake 2 years ago
not very good, like a 2.3 or 2.4... its capable of high 15's for sure
MGK1992 2 years ago
oh for sure, i get 2.2 60 ft's and i got 15.7 @86 so yours has the potential.
linoleumshake 2 years ago
nice... what are your mods? and how many miles do you have?
MGK1992 2 years ago
aem cai and around 68,xxxx miles. i have a vid of my car doing a 0-100 run, but that was stock, i'll try to get an updated vid with the cai soon. going to the track again and hopefully can pull off a better time with it being winter now.
linoleumshake 2 years ago
this car sucks major balls!
SMEGALswim 2 years ago
@SMEGALswim
just like you, you cocksucking faggot
GMCMan29 2 years ago
te rifas
gerardoneron 2 years ago
i owed 5 z24s in my life and have 2 still main Fact governor at 115 2.8 v6 1988 top speed 119. 1989 top speed 127 3.1 v6 1990 tru 94 top speed 132 auto 134 5speed
Jaygeta1 2 years ago
that sounds about right...
MGK1992 2 years ago
Bet you felt pretty bad ass huh haha
destinypaintball68 2 years ago
lol what do you mean by that?
MGK1992 2 years ago
Just that most people feel awesome when they are going about a buck twenty. its just a really good feeling
destinypaintball68 2 years ago
yeah too bad i have a govenor at 110 otherwise this car could almost hit 140 haha
MGK1992 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice video, check out my 3.1l i had to hit it from a 20 because it was raining but still.
renz586 2 years ago
i went 180 in my skyline. thats when the speedo maxes out. but i did run into a govoner:) and i was only at 5krpm and my redline is 7500.
burn21991 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
no you didn't.
renz586 2 years ago
I'm speechless.
d06svt 2 years ago
whys that?
MGK1992 2 years ago
I couldn't think of any snappy insults for your slow car.
d06svt 2 years ago
hey 93 v6 mustang against a 93 v6 cavalier the cavalier would win. i know. i did it. :) v6s aint gonna always have the power a v8 would have. so ofcourse his car is slow if you drive a v8. and actually on an automatic the car will go to 113 mph before the governor kicks in.
MrShinerunner23 2 years ago
@MrShinerunner23 another thing that favors the Chevy over the mustang is its relative light weight. You should also consider the gear ratios vs the respective torque curve each car has. I have no clue how it is like in the mustang, but the gm´s v6 attached to that Muncie-Getrag trans. do really kick ass!
cluless87mx 1 year ago
thats not bad. hp/torque?
dustmagejr 2 years ago
145hp, 190ft/ib with my little mods...its basically stock everything though...
MGK1992 2 years ago
okay, thanks. i've been considering buying one of these cars as a project, and modding it to around 200-250hp.
dustmagejr 2 years ago
omg... your serious, you actually wasted your time getting track times... sad...
FDallaround 2 years ago
congratulations for your car !!!!! i love the power of z24's
betoazul5 2 years ago
thats as fast as mine is i have a 93 rs 3.1 and its pretty fast but i can take mine a lil past 110 and that ford guy is full of it i seen his video and hes not really fast go chevy
93caviers 2 years ago
7.9 seconds...out of a 3.1L...
theclipper505 2 years ago
It's an ancient V6 with 210,000 miles what do you want exctly?
rudolphna54 2 years ago 9
lol sorry I didnt consider how old it was. At least its not the auto :)
theclipper505 2 years ago
@rudolphna54 My 90 Z24 had 280,000 on it when I sold it, and it'd still burn the front tires on takeoff... and it was an automatic with original engine and trans... If Chevy wants to get back in the game, they should re-make those cars
ChrsGuit 9 months ago
@rudolphna54 show the power of the lb6 v6chevrolets one of the best engine tasted for years,this engine works amazing in offroads ways too
contactbiotrance 6 months ago
my escort would stomp that and its a 1.8 4 banger non turbo with 146,000 miles
1979FordsRock 2 years ago
doubt it, i smoke escort gt's all day...
MGK1992 2 years ago
bull shit muy car hits 0-60 in 5.5 seconds and its a 4 banger
1979FordsRock 2 years ago
lol that was a good one...
MGK1992 2 years ago
dude how do you compaire that peace of trash with a Z24 and i think your watch doesn't work men sad face :( haha 5.5 seconds hahaahahahah
themoma199 2 years ago
Gotta say I'd rather have my old 94 Auto Z24 3.1 than my current Escort GT 5 spd. The Cavalier has so much classic styling almost muscle car like. At least the V6 doesn't stupid when the muffler falls off. Ug take a look at my vids for an embarrassing vid of no exhaust on a 4 banger.
magazinedude2002 2 years ago
haha not a bad sounding escort... i drove my z24 with open downpipe for awhile and it seriously sounded like a V8 350 and it screamed at when i floored it lol.
MGK1992 2 years ago
I don't want to put a 0-120 because my clutch is gone making it sound like I can't shift lol.
magazinedude2002 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out my video of My Cavalier See what you think of the 2.2
Ricozero 2 years ago
0 a 100 8.2 seg good
rasinger02 2 years ago
I miss my old z24. It was same as yours 5 speed 3.1 but mine was a 91. never could keep the horn cover in though :)
southernrocker21 2 years ago
he cant take a honda no more. =P
MFranciz90 2 years ago
haha yeah marc... whos prelude got beat by my cavalier again? lol
MGK1992 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
AHHHHHHHHHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHA. slow.
lazzer408 2 years ago
i have a 92 z24 auto
i'm thinkin about puttin some performance stuff in it
EHSstriker10 2 years ago
thats cool but the only problem is the 3 speed auto kills all the power, i raced one stock vs stock and beat it by a few car lengths...
MGK1992 2 years ago
yea i have a 3 speed auto in my 94 Cavy. that tranny definitely robs power
94crapalier 2 years ago
yup and even a 3.1 auto vs a 2.2 4cyl. 5speed would be a really close race...
MGK1992 2 years ago
yea it would!
94crapalier 2 years ago
It's not quite so much a loss of power as it is gearing. Obviously, the 5-speed has 2 extra gears over the 3-speed auto and has shorter gearing, allowing for better acceleration. Plus, the old 3.1's are all low-end and lack any top-end power. I used to drive a '92 Lumina base model with the 3.1 and 3-speed and it wasn't helped much that it had to hold out the gears for so long (which also meant running high up the RPM range longer than in the 5-speed, meaning a loss of power).
Halogen360 2 years ago
yeah deff. true... i just dont understand why GM would put a 3 speed auto in them instead of a 4 speed...
MGK1992 2 years ago
nice :)
zoidburg111 2 years ago
I bet you could easily take a honda lol
ojd1990 3 years ago 5
oh yeah, all day lol
MGK1992 3 years ago
My Grand Prix is slower than your cavalier, 3.1l on a light body is sweet, the prix isn't that heavy, yet it needs spunk!! Nice accelaration with your car BTW.
juanacious 2 years ago
@ojd1990 i think he could take a 5.0 mustang...of the same year and same miles
darren107 1 year ago
@darren107
maybe because 5.0s are slow dogs stock. But of course if you wanted to build a race cr most ppl would choose a fox over a Z24
ojd1990 1 year ago
@darren107 ive raced a couple stock 5.0 mustangs, one of them was a 5spd and one was an Auto but i was almost dead even with the 5spd but he got me once we got to about 85mph and i beat the Auto by a tiny bit...
MGK1992 1 year ago
Comment removed
sn8ke2005 1 year ago
Theres no way a 16 second car can beat a 13 second car, i've owned a 94 z24 and a 94 mustang gt with the 5.0 and the mustang kills it every which way. @MGK1992
sn8ke2005 1 year ago
I had a 91 jet black...miss that car...3.1 is a great motor...nice ride
broncofangj 3 years ago
Comment removed
Tunerboy8732 3 years ago
nice vid I have a 94 RS wit a 3.1 nd its fast definetly gives those ricers a run for there money
Tunerboy8732 3 years ago 2
yeah i know i can never get any ricers to race me, maybe its because they are too scared of losing haha...
MGK1992 3 years ago
hey, what is the rpm at 110mph
preludejunker 3 years ago
at 110 its at like 5,000 rpm's... the top of fourth gear is about 115 to 120mph... 5th gear goes all the way to 130 to 140mph...
MGK1992 3 years ago
ahh...reminds me of the old 1990 Z...powerful cars for their time! Nice vid
brunoxrs 3 years ago
yeah i know ive won alot of races with it haha.
MGK1992 3 years ago
my old 1990 used to lay the smack down on those pesky little rice burners. Friggin reliable too, owned it 16 years with NO major issues.
brunoxrs 3 years ago
Nice man, wish my Z24 was a stick, but I get to 110 too, just a hair behind you though. I've been told that these cars can do a burnout through 3rd gear with the manual gear box. Nice video and thanks for watching mine. 5 *****
redsx58 3 years ago
not bad man... where did you do this at? reply back on myspace..
jvspimpstud 3 years ago
Comment removed
jvspimpstud 3 years ago