Added: 3 years ago
From: xXxXTigerManXxXx
Views: 28,647
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (558)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LOL THAT'S A ROMAN MAN WITH A TOGA. DON'T THESE PEOPLE HAVE BETTER THINGS TO DO?????

  • That is not a Roman. Look at the eyes, those are the same eyes that Syrian people have. They look nothing like Italians we see today. I mean look at an Italian and you'll see the difference. You are judging it to be Roman because of the wear. Jews wore Togas since the 2nd BCE. Jews were heavily Hellenized people and it was that hellenization that led to the division of Jews into Pharisees, Essenes, and Zealots.

  • @SmartGuy4today Agree Jews were Hellenize too. But how can you say its a Jew? It could be a Romanized Syrian, Romanized Tunisian, Romanized babylonian or Romanized Philistine. Jews were Semitic too and so they all looked the same. How can you just take a sculpture and say its ancient Jew? This video doesn't give any further evidence or details

  • One of the key physical traits that all true Jews have in common with Middle-Eastern Arabs and Aramaeans that also differ them from Indo-Europeans (Europeans specifically) are the eyes. It is also what differs Arabs from Indians that a lot of Americans never take the effort or realize.

  • Um...it might be a TINY bit more meaningful if the video poster actually said who this statue was supposed to be of. Obviously it's a roman-made statue, but of whom???

  • @Migratoryprimate I wish more info was presented to but to his credit Jews were Roman citizens

  • They were Roman Citizens. Paul the Christian was a Jew named Saul and a Roman Citizen.

  • Cant Romans be black/jewish? Rome today is America where u get all sorts of people..And ancient Hebrews were dark skinned, not the white Caucasian (non-semites) you get today

  • Someone strapped a garment over a black slave to ultimately say that Jesus was black! JA JA JA JA J JA

  • Looks like an Americanized black man, lmao. 

  • nose is to small .

  • Looks like a black man to me.

  • @HappyHooker83 Wavy hair and all? Not very black by the look of it.

  • What do you mean black by?

  • as mike tyson would put this is ludicrous. roman statue italiano.

  • Anybody who come to this video and believes that lie/crap deserves to be deceived. If that's what Ancient Jews looked like.....then i got some state of the art townhomes for sale in a suburb of Afganastan. Call me for more info @ 1- 800-dumbass.

  • I love Hitler for murdering those Khazar rats. "Man Know Thy Self" These big nose dogs were oppressing the Germans and on top of that they were claiming a religion not a race of people. The ones who say they are jew-ish are so by conversion to Judaism the faith not by Nationality. Next time you see a rabbi, ask him what's his Nationality and also ask him of which tribe is he a descendant, I'm referring to the 12 tribes of Israel. The real JEWS are BLACK people not khazars.

  • I believe that everyone that commented that this was a roman statue is correct. Besides the fact that Yisraelites were not to cut their beards (Lev. 19) unless there was an infection (Lev. 14). The man in the statue clearly had a close cut shave on his face which was very Romanish. Elohim made beards on man as a distinctiveness between man and woman.

  • That is not a typical Jewish face. No details of its origin, or who made it, or where it was found are offered, only a baseless assertion without evidence.

  • OY!

  • fuck Jews

  • wow..the average jew was a statue?..

  • @wonnthree hahahahahhaha 

  • @wonnthree ahahahah you rule!

  • @wonnthree ,, Naaa. he just stoned..

  • Jews never built statues.

  • anyone saying behavior is genetic --doesn't have the knowledge of science

  • THE NEW JEWISH PEOPLE ARE BEING TAUGHT LIES IN THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN!!

  • what? thats a Roman!... they Jews have Hook noses and Rat faces! LOL! ;)

  • I'm sure they looked like traders

  • jews want to be glorious powerfull romans

  • LOL thats a roman man

    FAIL

  • @MrRobyopunkass HAHAHA!!!!! Major FAIL!!!! LOL

  • THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT AN ASHKENAZI JEW LOOKS LIKE. NOT A HEBREW. THANK YOU FOR THE IMAGE.

  • @buttahpecan lol....that bust is a Jew from 332 to 37 B.C....the "Hebrews" lived during that time and were called Jews by the babylonians because they were from the Kingdom of Judah or Yehudah and the HEBREW word for Jew is Yehud. King David himself only lived 500 or so years before that bust. So the bust itself is over 2000 years old, well before Ashkenazi Jews existed.

  • @buttahpecan thats a lie????

  • @Nickidewbear most ashkenazi Jews I've seen don't look semitic, and Jewish girls are notoriously malicious. If they pull crap now, chances are their grandmothers did, cultures may change, and times may change, but behaviors inherent to genes do not, and like all semitic women, Jew-bitches are arrogant, and arrogance is the thing that leads to evil. For people who live near Jews NOW, no one wants to marry Jewish women because they are notorious adulteresses.

  • @pillsburydoughboy47 behavior is not genetic-

  • @BOGZASV8MA ah, a solid 50% of it is.....

  • @pillsburydoughboy47 what about the other 50%?

  • @BOGZASV8MA ah, environment..... as a general rule though environment just merely gives nasty people a different breed of nasty.  Example; someone born with nasty genes in suburbia, will grow up to be a corporate douchebag who rapes women who work under him and never see even an hour of jail time. Same said person born in, oh, a bad neighborhood of Moscow, Russia, will be a mafia hitman. Nasty just expresses itself in different ways is all.

  • @pillsburydoughboy47 i don't know what the hell are you talking about ?????

  • @Nickidewbear You're only Hebrew if you have the gene for favism, along with near eastern features. Even primarily breeding with European women, the gene should still be there somewhere. If its there, yeah, you're Hebrew, but if it isn't you're not. Favism does not afflict ashkenazi Jews because breeding with white bitches no doubt rendered it dormant. Dormant however, does not mean absent.

  • With a toga and a Roman clip. Right. Looks pretty accurate to me. Check out the busts of Brutus sometime. Now there's a lesson in history.

  • even in the bible is written "Jesus said unto them"(Jews)

    " You are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John.8:42-44. KJV Bible)

  • @VendPrekmurec

    As a medical doctor I suggest you to visit psychologist.If your psychological condition deteriorate further and you develop a full scale paroid syndrome with obsessive-compulsive elements you may need medication as well.

  • @Tomislavv2 wow you are a fucking psychologist?wow you are probably smart now right? I am a physicist so fucking what? Have you ever asked yourself what if - you are "obsessed" with something more than me? I mean your channel is like some channel of some 9 year old boy from kindergarten..

    "I speak Serbian, Hebrew, Arabic, English, Russian, Hungarian, Slovakian,German"

    well and i speak German, Hungarian, Russian, Hungarian, Slovakian, Serbian, Italian Slovenian and Sanskrit"

    so what?

  • @Tomislavv2 about "psychiatry"

    watch?v=6qs9TLTvYFs

  • Comment removed

  • @VendPrekmurec

    Do not react as an offended child.My advice was sincere.As your channel is not available for certain reasons I cant send you few important facts.Therfore send me please a PM and I will reply you.I am not psychologist I am on third year of pediatrics,my interests are related to genetics.I will remove this comment later.

  • "jews" - afro semites - the "chosen ones, beloved ones" or the "shining ones" were always parasites. They were adopting even Aryan knowledge as was Kabbalah and writing their own occult history. (became also part of western history - stories from torah and (Jesuit) School - Levites hebraic "Shol" (egyptian teaching about Duat - Osirian levites school.

    many people here know this that there is one big occult hoax behind all of this Abrahamic (Anti Brahmanic) doctrine... they are masters of lies

  • I'd love to see proof for that claim: "Ashkenazi history is full of malicious traitor gold digger women, who married white men in Europe because they were rich, prefering them over Jewish men, because Jewish men were poor." Most of us Ashkenazic Jews, even Crypto Jews, were far from touching gentiles with a 10-foot pole; and my Great-Granddad Czarnecki got into a heap of trouble when he married the gentile Slavic American known as Mary Trudniak, and he attended her church.

  • @Nickidewbear Actually, the evidence is the other way, which makes perfect sense. The majority of intermarriages were between Jewish men and gentile women, as the genetic record makes clear. It happened about 1 in 200 marriages per generation

  • "European" Jews are Hebrew Jews who settled and/or were born in Europe, or descended from Jews settling and/or being born in Europe.

  • I wonder how that was allowed, though. Authorities back in Ha'Eretz did not allow a prototype of Jesus to be reconstructed with a skull which was requested to be used.

  • This was not a very long video, but interesting..

  • Is he a great-great-great.....-great-g­randdad of Wolf Blitzer and Billy Joel?

  • He looks like Wolf Blitzer, Billy Joel, and other Ashkenazic Jews if you look hard enough.

  • @Nickidewbear LOL. You're right. He does kinda look like Billy Joel and Wolf Blitzer, although he was probably more tanned

  • THAT"S RIGHT! the real jews were blacks and still are!

  • @ResurrectTheElect original "jews" were afro semites, descendants of the "chosen ones" - Adamic race (created by their god) - who created their "race" with mixing of human and non human dna (in sumeria were they known as "anunnaki", before they became "1" god)

  • @VendPrekmurec

    LMAO. You call this pseudo-sci-fi delusions the TRUTH? "Adamic race"? Anunaki? You're a deluded imbecile and a racist. There is no one with "non-human DNA". Why dont you find some of your fellow addled cult members to talk to?

  • that looks like my karate instructor and he is sepharadim

  • Toda. We were originally Olive, not Black. So, "ResurrectTheElect" would do well to hold his tongue.

  • there were no "Ancient Jews" before 11. century AD

    original "jews" are Afro-Semites (Adamic - Adapas - Anunnaki's cross breed )

  • We don't belong among African (Kushite) peoples. But are some of us Yehudi and Kushi? Yes. Langston Hughes was a Yehudi Kushi (because his dad was a Matrilineal Jew, and her dad was the Jewish Silas Cushenberry).

  • "We cannot conclude that the Polish Jews were solely of Western origin, it is highly probable that during the first millennium of our era the first Jews to penetrate into the territories between the Oder and the Dnieper came from the southeast, from the Jewish kingdom of the Khazars."

    - Leon Poliakov, in The History of Anti-Semitism: From the Time of Christ to the Court Jews, trans. Richard Howard (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003), page 246.

  • Leon Poliakov is wrong. Ashkenazic Jews come from Israel then went into Turkey (which became Byzantinia) and other places; then some who left Byzantinia went to Khazaria.

  • Just a thought in a form of a question: Why is it so hard to believe that the Hebrew Israelites in the scriptures were black when you have imposters like the Ashkenazis, khazar, sephardic whatever, leading you all these years on earth, to believe that they were the children of Israel. Is it that difficult to accept blacks? Are we that inferior to people that we could not be considered the true Isrealites?We have lots of evidence, and we still are called racist, anti-semitic, stupid.

  • Another famous Jew (author) admitting Khazarian ancestry:

    "Dan Rottenberg, who has traced his and his wife's family back to the early 1800s and found one line that goes back to the Khazar kingdom in the Crimea, which dates to the 8th century... In any case, some East European Jews, and perhaps a great many, are descended from the Khazars... a branch of my wife's family named Tamarin, from Russia, maintains that the family came into Judaism via the Khazar conversion."

  • @karlkarlkarl1234 Wow. Dan Rottenberg. Well, that settles it. The DAN has spoken. His wife's family allegedly claims descent from Khazars, so it must be true. My neighbor's family claims descent from Roman emperors. They have just as much proof, lol.

  • @karlkarlkarl1234 The Jews of Spain (Sephardim) had no connection to eastern Europe whatsoever. They accounted for the majority of Jews 1000 years ago.

    I defy you to find a single linguist who can find any Turkic element in Yiddish. THere is Hebrew, Aramaic, Old Romance, German, and Slavic. But nothing Turkic. How strange for a people of alleged Turkic origins.

    And please show me Jews who look like Central Asian "Huns", lol

  • There is some Turkic in Yiddish. However, this does not take away that Ashkenazic Jews are Jews. Remember that many of us Ashkenazic Jews were kicked out of Byzantinia during the pogroms there.

  • @Nickidewbear

    "There is some Turkic in Yiddish"

    My friend, that is completely incorrect. There is actually no trace of anything Turkic in Yiddish. Hebrew, Aramaic, Old Romance. German, Slavic, yes. It mirrors Jewish migration through Europe in different centuries. But there is no Turkic element at all.

  • That makes him part of 12%-17% of Jews who have Khazarian blood.

  • "These are the words the LORD spoke concerning **Israel and Judah**,Ask and see: Can a man bear children? Then why do I see every strong man with his hands on his stomach like a woman in labour, every **face turned deathly pale**?" Jeremiah 30:6

    Since when do Negros turns "deathly pale"?

    Negros are not the Israelites...the Jews are.

  • @ResXperience On what basis do you call ancient Jewish populations like Ashkenazim and Sephardim are "imposters"? What a racist statement. You know nothing of the history of Jews in the last 2000 years. Why is it so difficult for YOU to accept that Jews are in fact Jews?

    "Are we that inferior to people that we could not be considered the true Isrealites?"

    Who's been treated as inferiors more and for longer than Jews? Do you think the world cares who is an Israelite? You dont get a prize for it

  • @chained2it In order to be considered an Israelite, well first you have to be a descendant of shem, second off none of those jews came from the land of Israel. If what I said is racist, then YES I am racist, because unlike YOU I can admit who I am. By the way me saying that they are imposters are facts, not racism. Dont play that race card chump! The world doesnt care who the israelites are, who cares, The only ones who cares is God and the Hebrews who know who they are. Shalom.

  • @ResXperience "The Hebrews who know who they are. Shalom."

    As if you speak Hebrew? The "Hebrews" know who they are because they have kept alive their traditions and their lineage for thousands of years. You know nothing of Jewish history for the last 2000 years. Shem is a biblical myth. I am not talking about biblical myth. The Bible was written in ancient Judea, an actual nation, not a myth. Jews were the people of that nation, and Jews today are their descendants. Simple historical fact

  • "... in the territory between the Black Sea & the Baltic, most of which was part of the kingdom of Poland, there European Jews had met another strand of the Jewish people, Jews who had entered the same area from the south & east. Jewish colonies on the Black Sea and in the Crimea dated back to very early times, and the kingdom of the Khazars had left many Jewish relics in lands." - J. Parkes, in A History of the Jewish People (Chicago, IL: Quadrangle Books, 1963), pages 105-106. 

  • Shem is no myth.

  • @chained2it, I agree that the "races" (ethnic groups) came per Migdal Bavel (the Tower of Babel).

  • @ResXperience "then YES I am racist,"

    Then dont complain when other are racist towatds you, hypocrite.

    " I can admit who I am."

    Really? Is that why you claim Israelite ancestry when you are in fact West African? When there is not a SHRED of evidence that your ancestors lived in the middle east 2000 years ago? No genetic historical, or linguistic evidence. Jews have always been around, for over 3000 years. We have never disappeared, just been scattered. The world has always known who we were

  • "It is very likely that the Judaized Khazars, especially those that had acculturated to the cities, contributed to the subsequently Slavic-speaking Jewish communities of Kievan Rus'. In the same way, one may conjecture that Khazar Muslims contributed to the Turkic-speaking and Turko-Muslim communities of the Volga basin and North Caucasus." - Peter Benjamin Golden, in An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples (Wiesbaden, Germany: Otto Harrassowitz, 1992), pages 243-244.

  • @ResXperience

    "saying that they are imposters are facts, not racism"

    Really? Based on WHAT do you claim it is "fact"? There are no "facts" that prove your claim. It is nothing but slander, and an attempt to boost your ego by claiming an ancestry you imagine makes you special. Jews are just people like anyone else. And their identity has never been a mystery, Historical records of Jews are extensive even after the Bible. The ancestry of most Jews today was indeed in ancient Judea and Israel

  • "Jews reached Lithuania from the shortlived but flourishing Jewish state of the Khazars, who were among the founders of Kiev in 865. The Khazars lost their kingdom in 969 to the Russian princes, who introduced the Russian Orthodox Church... Thus inspired, the Russians expelled the Jews..., who moved en masse to the then-Lithuanian towns of Gardinas (Grodno), Minsk, Pinsk..." - M. Greenbaum, The Jews of Lithuania: A History of a Remarkable Community 1316-1945 (Jerusalem: Gefen, 1995), page 2.

  • @ResXperience

    'none of those jews came from the land of Israel"

    Funny how historical records and DNA says otherwise. I guess the Romans were lying when they wrote accounts of bringing hundreds of thousands of Jewish slaves from Judea to Europe.

  • "The descendants of the Khazars reached eastern and central Europe. There is substantial evidence that some of them settled in Slavic lands, where they took part in establishing the major Jewish centers of eastern Europe. Many Khazar Jews fled to Poland to avoid forced baptism... some fled into northern Hungary."

    - Robert and Elinor Slater, in Great Moments in Jewish History (Middle Village, NY: Jonathan David, 1999), page 87.

  • If you look up the numbers, only 12%-17% of Ashkenazic Jews have any Khazar blood whatsoever. This means that only 12%-17% of Ashkenazic Jews at maximum have any ancestors who violated Deuteronomy 7:1-5 and Numbers 36, or were frankly raped by Khazar men.

  • "It is clear that the influence of Jews, who became the most active agents of the commerce of the Caliphate, was substantial in the Khazar kingdom, and it is probable that the commonly observed mongoloid type among East European Jews, particularly in the Ukraine, Poland and Roumania, derives from the conversions and intermarriages of the Khaqans." - W. E. D. Allen, in The Ukraine (New York, NY: Russell and Russell, 1963), pages 8-9.

  • The world does care- you forgot to mention that Blacks like Res get more breaks than Jews.

  • @ResXperience

    "We have lots of evidence, and we still are called racist, anti-semitic, stupid."

    Because its racist, anti-Semitic, and stupid. The people of the Levant region (middle east) are not black. Jews come from that region. Do you think if you are considered an Israelite that the world will hold you in high esteem or something? You fetishize Israelites, which makes it impossible for you to accept Jews simply as people.

  • @chained2it We dont care about what glory the world will give us because it is not the worlds glory we seek but YHWH's glory. How can I be anti-semetic, then I would be against myself. Why does true facts have to be racist. If I gave you information and proof that fits my argument, you should be more open. But the problem is that You cant accept the true facts. We dont hate the synagogue of satan, we just know who the real hebrews are and who are not.

  • @ResXperience " How can I be anti-semetic, then I would be against myself."

    Please. You are in no way semitic. West African culture is not semitic. You have not given any information. You do nothing but make silly claims based on the religious rhetoric of a cult. You are about as Hebrew as a ham sandwich, lol. Who do you wannabees think you are fooling?

  • "In 1016 C.E., the Russians crushed the Khazar kingdom and brought it to a close...They were certainly dispersed in many of the neighboring lands. It is conceivable, according to many scholars, that they are the forebears of the Polish & Russian Jews of previous generations. If your ancestors came from these lands, you may have the blood of kings in you - not David and Solomon."

    - Rabbi Benjamin Blech, in The Complete Idiot's Guide to Jewish History and Culture (Alpha Books, 1999), p.161-162.

  • Comment removed

  • Torah was written long before 1000 AD.

  • @Nickidewbear 1. Torah is Leningrad Codex - written in 11. century AD, there IS NOT OLDER TORAH ON THIS WORLD. Later Jewish - Christian popes burned all those books over the europe, because they were very afraid of the truth to come into the surface that so called "New Testament" - doctrine is even older (written Bible - Bible of Kolbrin, Egyptian Osirian Alexandrian Christianity) than "Old Testamen" (written)... but book survived in private hands in Russia...

    Old "Jews" were Hyksos in Egypt

  • @VendPrekmurec

    There is a 2300 year old Torah,the entire Torah was found at Qumran.

  • @Tomislavv2 do you mean Dead Sea Scrolls? Yeah this is another interesting "fact"... well you do not realize that there exist a massive fundation - to support the idea that EVERYTHING came from Mesopotamia (Anunnaki, Bible, Torah, etc etc) - as OCCULT IDEA (and nothing more)

    back to DSS... You perhaps do not realize that DSS were written from 7-11 century AD (as CORRECT dating with radiocarbon C-14: has deviation of cca +/- 1400 years...

  • @VendPrekmurec The Dead Sea Scrolls date back to the 3rd century BC. And of course the Bible came from Mesopotamian region, as the Bible itself makes clear

  • @VendPrekmurec

    No there is an ABSOLUTE CONSENSUNS among ALL scientiscts that Dead sea scroles were wrriten between 200 BCE and 70 CE,radicarbon analyses allso supported this fact..Dating the dead sea scrolles is not an issue anymore.The origin of the authors of Dead Sea scrolls remained a mistery,but the time frame in which they were wrriten is certanly not.

  • @VendPrekmurec The earliest fragment of any Biblical texts dates back to the 8th century BC, a fragment of Isaiah

  • @chained2it whole Afro Semitic occult, nothing more

  • @VendPrekmurec Whatever that means,

  • @chained2it Josephus Flavius,Against Apion, 1,73

    Moses: It was also reported that the priest, who ordained their polity and their laws, was by birth of Heliopolis, and his name Osarsiph, from Osyris, who was the god of Heliopolis; but that when he was gone over to these people, his name was changed, and he was called Moses.

    with other words... Moses was Levites priest of Osiris (Asura)

  • @VendPrekmurec To begin with, the proclamations of any single writer prove nothing. But that's not what Josephus claimed, only what some in one region believed. And even if Moses was a pagan Egyptian priest, the religion Moses preached bore little resemblance to Egyptian religion. And in all likeness, the entire story of Moses is likely mythical at best, at least in part.

    And none of that has anything to do with your claims. If Moses lived it was in the 13th century BC

  • @chained2it LOL SO IF MANETHO WAS NOT A EGYPTIAN HISTORIAN, SO YOU ARE ?

  • @VendPrekmurec Actually, I have a minor degree in historical studies. Manetho lived over 1000 years after the story of the Exodus. His writing doesnt prove there was any connection to the Biblical Moses. Many scholars believe his writings were altered to include the name of Moses. Regardless it proves nothing but Manetho's beliefs about a man by that name. Josephus was a historian too, and he didnt share Manetho's view of Moses. If there even WAS a Moses. You're talking religious myths

  • Comment removed

  • @chained2it Moses was his (Osarphys) later name. Name "Moses" was compiled by Levites (Osiris's school) and means "Mes" (egyptian "giving a birth to..., son of ... " (Titulus of Horus, real son of Ra and not Osiris - btw...) and Yah (even this word was not their... it was taken from old Chaldeans - who were simply old Slavs; term Yav' - "appear", material realm, or "I am"... YHWH became "forbidden word" and "Baal" (Veles)as a "demon"

  • Comment removed

  • @VendPrekmurec Chaldeans were Slavs? That's hysterical. "Eheieh" is the name of God which means "I am". It is the name given at the burning bush. Your post reads like the delusional rantings of a schizophrenia patient

  • Comment removed

  • @VendPrekmurec "El is plural of god"

    No, imbecile, El means god. singular. HIM is the masculine plural. The name is Elohim. There is no connection to the Slavic language.

    What are you trying to accomplish? You simply make the most ridiculous claims without the slightest objective proof. You simply invent alleged "facts" , There is no point even talking to you

  • @chained2it study again you jewish "scholar"... i will not be the judge when you will die... if you think you are so fucking superior, you are wrong...

  • @VendPrekmurec "if you think you are so fucking superior, you are wrong.."

    It has nothing to do with being "fucking superior". Tsk tsk. DId i hurt your feelings?

    It has everything to do with your being a delusional bullshit artist who replaces reality with his own personal fantasies and makes up "facts" to suit himself

  • Comment removed

  • @chained2it ... Kabbalah has nothing (in original) to do with Abrahamic religion... ever heard about Kundalini?

    Very jewish right?

  • @VendPrekmurec Kundalini has nothing to do with Kabbalah. They simply deal with the same things

  • @VendPrekmurec So because Kundalini deals with the rising serpent power, and Kabbalah deals with the rising serpent path, they must have common origins? People paved roadways and paths in similar fashion all over the world with no connection to one another. You're so interested in uncovering "conspiracies" that hide the "truth" that the point of anything like Kabbalah is lost on you. Especially with your blatantly racist views of sub-humans, etc

  • @chained2it other roman sources about "jews" ... they were known as Calini (Kali Ma dark moon cult) from India (yes 1. garden of eden was near Kashmir - old Kush Mir (notice the similarity with Biblical Kush in Africa - there were Aryan prisoners brought into ...from Kushmir)

    you think you know about the past eh?

  • @VendPrekmurec

    I am sorry but I red Josephus many times and there is no such thing in his book as you have wrriten here.All Josephus books are on internet.Against Apion gutenberg(.)org/dirs/2/8/4/284­9/2849(.)txt

    There is no even a 1,73 passage as passages are numbered with 1,2,3.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @Tomislavv2 Other "facts" were simply complied in old Byzantine (old Jerusalem) - new became Russia(yes for that "glory" - whole Slavic - Venetic history was re-written ... also with help of Teutonic - Gothic (later became "germanic" order)

  • @VendPrekmurec "old Byzantine (old Jerusalem)

    The city of Byzantium was in Asia Minor, not Israel. Do you make this stuff up yourself, or do the voices in your head help you?

  • @Tomislavv2 about "god" from the Torah - you will find him in Egypt... to know jews who they really are, you have to meet, their real lord Asura / Bakasura, Osiris and - name Hyksos ) ... but this is just only the beginning of this story and whole perversion

    I hope you will sleep well this night

  • @VendPrekmurec HYKSOS is the name of a people, not a god. The Hyksos were Semitic invaders from Canaan. The name simply means "foreign invader".

    Seriously, is it aliens who tell you this stuff? Or was it the plot of your favorite comic book?

  • @Nickidewbear Hyksos worshiped cult of Osiris. Moses was in fact Levites. Priest of Osiris from Heliopolis (read Egyptian historian Manetho - Flavius)

    "He" (Levites) compiled also 10 commandments - taken from Osiris's Book of the dead...the same with so called "Circumcision"... Roman historians also called Jews as Calini from India (from SARAswati - where 1. Anti Brahman - Abrahm - Abraham came from)

  • You Kemetists never hold your tongue and think before you speak, do you?

  • @Nickidewbear LOL why the hell should i keep my mouth shut? I speak the truth, so if you do not like it, fuck off

  • Your language suggests otherwise.

  • Comment removed

  • "Poland was Christianized in 966, at a time when Jews already lived there. The first ones came from the Khazar state of Russia and Kievan Rus. Late in the eleventh century, Jews fleeing from persecution in southern and western Europe arrived. Not, however, until the fifteenth century did large numbers of Jews begin to live in Poland."

     - Meyer Weinberg, in Because They Were Jews: A History of Anti-Semitism (Greenwood Press, 1986), page 153

  • @ResXperience "Is it that difficult to accept blacks?"

    No. Is it that difficult for you to accept your ancestry as it is and not try to steal another's heritage? What does inferiority have to do with it? Jews have already been subjected to genocide for being an "inferior race". You seem to think being an Israelite will grant you some special favor. It doesnt work that way. Jews have been persecuted for centuries. If Jews are "chosen" its only in the eyes of God, and God knows who is who

  • @chained2it Exactly, what I have been saying about those jews who say they are the Hebrew Israelites. Stilling the heritage of the real hebrews. Jewish people have always considered so called blacks as inferior, please dont make me prove it. Seems that you dont understand the duet 28, seeming that you think that the jews already suffered the curse in the bible by the hands of germany. You should check your facts. You and many people on this forum are the real anti semites!

  • @ResXperience You have no CLUE about whats happened to Jews, LONG before Germany. I'm talking about actual history, and you are talking about your ill-informed superstitious interpretation of scripture. Deut 28 is about the terms of the Covenant, including the punishment for abandoning it. Its not a prophecy. Even if it was, it has nothing to do with African slavery 1500 years later. Jews were enslaved by Rome 2000 years ago.

  • "It's highly possible that my ancestry might not move in the direction of ancient Israel at all.... After 965 CE, the Khazars were through as an organized power, but Judaism remained, and it may well be that many East European Jews are descended from Khazars and the people they ruled. I may be one of them."

    - Isaac Asimov, in It's Been A Good Life (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2002), chapter 1.

  • Isaac Asimov was a revisionist and Athiest.

  • "Jews are the largest and most important of these nationalities [of Soviet Union]... According to many historians, they are descended from the Khazars, a people who ruled much of the Volga-Dnieper basin the 7th to 9th centuries and converted to Judaism en masse in the 8th century." - William G. Andrews, in The Land and People of the Soviet Union (New York, NY: HarperCollins, 1991), page 183.

  • You Afrocentrics are the actual revisionists.

  • Actually DNA supports what I'm saying perfectly.

    Once again do to w w w . khazaria .com and read about Jewish history written by the Jews (not Zionists who deny their history)

  • @karlkarlkarl1234

    LOL,. Lying weasel, I just quoted EXACTLY what the khazaria website says about DNA. It COMPLETELY CONTRADICTS you liar. Go ahead and quote what it says, liar. Look at my comments below. Those are quotes directly from that website. Can you READ, imbecile?

    "East European Jewish ancestry originates substantially from ancient Judea, and the same is true of most other modern Jewish populations .... But, it is rational to conclude that some Jews also have some Khazar ancestors."

  • - "possibly-Khazar ancestral strain represents a minority rather than a majority of Eastern European Jews. On the paternal side, Khazar ancestry in Ashkenazic Jews appears to have totalled between 5 and 19 percent"

    "genetic study published by Harry Ostrer ... in 2010 showed that Ashkenazic Jews have more northern Mediterranean ancestry than Slavic/Khazar ancestry, and also showed strong links between Ashkenazim and Italian Jews, Greek Jews, Sephardic Jews, and Syrian Jews"

    U lying weasel

  • "At the present time we know of no nation under the heavens where Christians do not live. For [Christians are even found] in the lands of Gog and Magog -- who are a Hunnic race and are called Gazari (Khazars)... circumcized and observing all [the laws of] Judaism." - in Expositio in Matthaeum Evangelistam, composed circa 864.

    "The Khazars write Hebrew [letters]." - Muhammad ibn Ishaq an-Nadim of Baghdad, in his late 10th century Kitab al-Fihrist.

  • @karlkarlkarl1234

    Associated Press Sept 9, 2008

    "Russian archaeologists said Wednesday they had found the long-lost capital of the Khazar kingdom in southern Russia"....

    "The city was the capital of the Khazars, a semi-nomadic Turkic peoples who adopted Judaism..."

    "The capital is referred to as Itil in Arab chronicles .....Itil was said to be a multi-ethnic place with houses of worship and judges for Christians, Jews, Muslims and pagans. Its remains have until now never been identified"

  • "Descendants of the Khazars, men noteworthy for their learning and piety, were known long after in Toledo.... And, to the present day, the Mongoloid features common amongst the Jews of eastern Europe are, in all probability, a heritage from these 'proselytes of righteousness' of ten centuries ago." - Cecil Roth, in A Short History of the Jewish People (London: Horovitz [East and West Library], 1959), page 288.

  • "Part of the Khazar Jews remained in their areas of settlement because there is evidence of a messianic movement among the Jewish Khazars of the Crimea. Others returned to the Caucasus and there augmented the Jews who had earlier immigrated from Persia. They formed the core of the 'Mountain Jews' who even today live in communities rich in tradition. Khazar Jews also settled in Kiev and other cities in Rus', as well as in Poland." - H. Haumann, A History of East European Jews (2002), p.6-7.

  • "The Khazars integrated with the Russian kingdom at its formation, the majority of them fled to Central Europe, where they met the flow of Jewish immigrants from France and Germany that came as a result of the Crusades. And from their meeting the Ashkenazi Jews were born. The surnames Kagan and Kaganovitch, and the names of villages in Poland like Kaganka, attest in this area to the presence of Jewish Khazars."

    - M. Halter, L'Empire khazar, (2005), p.12

  • @karlkarlkarl1234 "where they met the flow of Jewish immigrants from France and Germany that came as a result of the Crusades. And from their meeting the Ashkenazi Jews were born"

    According to this particular theory, they would only be partially of Khazar descent. Which means they would still be of Israeite descent. Do you think Khazar blood is cursed or something? Or do you think Jews need to be "pure-blooded" for some reason?

    Btw, the Jewish name "kagan" is a variant of the hebrew "kohen"

  • From the JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA: "Khazars, a non-semitic, Asiatic tribal nation who emigrated into Eastern Europe about the first century, who were converted as an entire nation to Judaism in the seventh century by the expanding Russian nation which absorbed the entire Khazar population, and who account for the presence in Eastern Europe of the great numbers of Yiddish-speaking Jews in Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Galatia, Besserabia and Rumania."

  • @karlkarlkarl1234 Once again, this is a FALSE quote from the Jewish Encyclopedia, It says nothing about Yiddish speakers