@dud321xyz fuck you fucking retard nadal fans....a lot of people just hate nadal......why do you bring up fed name when he talked about nadal....get a respect!
1. So what. WHo cares? Many players grunt louder than he does.
2. Fakes injuries? HE NEVER GIVES UP! Why would he fake his injuries?
3. Mearly just a stupid opinion of yours.
4. Nervous habbit. He can't help it.
5. How can he not be elegant if he got to the top.
And you call these facts? The only fact you wrote on here is that he rubs his pants. Everything else is your OPINION. You wouldn't know a statement that's a fact if it bit you.
1. Name me 5 players in the tour who grunt louder than Nadal. Still an awefull habit, I've seen him keep his mouth shut when he plays an important point.
2. He does fake injuries. Why did he take medical timeouts after being 1-2 down in sets vs Peztschner and Haase, won both matches and went on to win the championship? Was he just cautious or was it a dirty trick?
3. He does grimace a lot, especially when he's losing as if he was to say "How dare you beat me!"
1. Ferrer, gonzalez, murray,djokovic(at times). And who really cares? It's not that bad of a habbit. Almost every player grunts at sometime, including fed.
2. You couldn't prove it. And when does nadal ever lose to players out of the top 50 within the last 2 years.
"5. How can he not be elegant if he got to the top."
This is what you said. Then I said "Yep, not elegant" and your response was "Who cares"? Did you change your mind in a split second? This is another example how retarted nadaltards are.
As for Nadal omfg if he's the no 1 player does that forbid me from critisizing him? When Rios got to no 1 did everyone keep their mouth shut because he was the no 1 even without a single slam on his account?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@89Pleasek Whatever dude. Your opinion is your opinion. I like Nadal and you don't. It's really not worth arguing with you. Nadal is a great player and should be respected, even if you are the biggest fed fan/Nadal hater.
@Rafathaman94 dude, YOU need to respect fed, these 2 dudes are good friends, all the top tennis players are just a group of rich millionares, its all about money. the "rivalries" and blah blah they do care about of course, but it's about the money.
@cj397 I DO respect Fed. He's even one of my favorites. I don't respect people like you who are Federer loving biased a***holes that hate nadal. Maybe YOU should respect Nadal more? Ever thought of that? And what is with you and this "it's all about the money" crap. Dude, THEY LIKE TO WIN! Not get money. If the money was taken away, they would still try as hard because most tennis players LIKE TO WIN! When Fed cried at the AO, did he cry because he couldn't beat Nadal or because he didn't get $?
I mean how retarded can you be, what does 1 thing have to do with the other? Muster got to the top, was he elegant? Hell no! He grunted like a slaughtered pig each time he hit the ball, moved ugly. Nadal is at the bottom of the list of the most elegant players who got to no 1. Edberg was an elegant player, McEnroe was, even goddamn Sampras to some degree, now Federer. Nadal is definately not an elegant player, put that in your empty head
1. There is actually a difference between grunting "sometime" and doing it permanently whatever shot you're playing (including easy putaway volleys or dropshots, very energy demanding!"
2. You can't prove shit that he didn't as well. Everyone knows Nadal's dirty tricks, he got 2 warnings at Wimbledon this year, one for coaching and 1 for wasting time between serves. Guess that's just a coincidence.
3. 2007 Wimbledon vs Federer, check the last few games or check any match in which he's losing.
@SSJPeter 500 points are no that valuble to Nadal. Why shouldNadal waste his time in a silly 500 event when he should be focusing on the French open. And he WILL BE IN THE TOP 4 GUARENTEED!
@Rafathaman94 Nadal played well but he wasn't at his peak.
Federer played well but he wasn't as his peak.
However it was close and Federer has just started to play well again so Roland Garross will be even closer....and when both at their peaks Federer is always better on grass.
lol that isnt any good my friend at north woods high school is much better....where do these guys go to skool..it looks like a champion match and i must say it looks like they are both horrible rofl my friend would kill them both especially that 1 guy who cant even hit the ball rofl he sucks his highschoo,must suck to make the team rofl wow north woods 4 life btch
It doesn't matter his age or his record against the great Swiss. Federer has the numbers. Nadal is annoying, a bore to watch play, a one-dimension player that has only one trick in the book: plays relentless tennsi, because he knows he will never get tired (due, propably, to the use of illegal substances). His ambition is endless, vicious, when he loses you can see how angry he is when "shaking hands" with his opponent. He is obssessive and is not an example at all.
How dare you insult one of the best players in the world like that? What the hell are you talking about? Banned substances? Federer is angry when he loses matches to. You obviously don't know anything about nadal!
I always root for Federer against Nadal, but that doesn't mean I'm still not a huge fan of Rafa. His game is a true marvel, and he has given us some of the best matches in tennis history; I still get giddy just thinking of his showdown with Verdasco at the 2009 AO. I truly hope he recovers from his grueling style of play, although I am not optimistic seeing that he has not been the same player for over a year now despite being in his physical prime. Vamos Rafa!
nadal is not less succesful then federer DRKvideo. At rafas current age federer had only won 2 or 3 grand slams and nadals won 6 with the most of last year out.
THANK YOU! That is the exact reason why Nadal IS BETTER than federer. Nadal accomplished more at a younger age. People keep forgetting that Nadal is 5 YEARS YOUNGER THAN FEDERER! Nadal is more succesful than federer!
@ SSJPeter "I'm sure he won't! He can't. These are pure facts." How is that pure facts? The future never happened yet. Nobody knows for sure nadal won't defend his titles he won from Indinan Wells to Madrid. It is a fact that you are just stating opinions. Maybe Nadal won't win as much as federer, but that does not mean he can't win more titles.
Federer's game is pure talent. Such players always need to mature in order to perform in 100%. Nadal's game is physical and very tactically based. Thus, Nadal had to be successfull earlier when compared to Federer, otherwise, he wouldn't be successful at all, just because of the physical limitation his style will put upon him.
lol come on this is so ridiculous...Roddick is good but CLEARLY nowhere near as good and versatile as Nadal..he'll never be as good as a Nadal or a Federer, his speed, groundstrokes, placement, volleying, etc...are not EVEN close..how are you even debating this; Roddick hasn't won a grandslam in 6 years. Rafa just won two last year, an olympic gold medal and has won 5 grandslams total. He is 22. lol I'm an American but seriously let's be sensible here, Roddick's not a better player.
SpaceClay, Rafa has won 6 Grand Slams. All minus one against Federer and in all surfaces. He has beaten Fed 13/19 times in all surfaces too. Rafa has now won GS in every surface (something Roger couldn't). And Rafa has broken all sorts of tennis records; already matched the great Borg on clay titles. Looking at what Rafa has done at 22 everyone else (except Fed) looks insignificant.
dude I dunno if you are arguing with me or just correcting me what? obviously when I wrote that Rafa had not won the Australian yet. I think we're on the same side here I am definitely agreeing to the fact that Rafa is probably the best player in the world right now and one of the best in history. he is unbelievable. maybe you should read my post again. Federer is and always will be my favorite player but he just cannot beat Rafa right now.
no, ur just o stubborn to admit tht ur crybaby federer has been left in the dust by nadal. but fed can beat nadal if nadal's knees werent hurting. otherwise noone can beat a heathy nadal
im not going to say naal isnt great but in terms of tennis greatNESS, federer is greater b/c he has the grand slam and 5 wimbledons and 5 us opens in a row
if nadal could stay healthy, i think he could become the greatest ever without a doubt, but thats part of being a great tennis player as well
so dont get all annoying and get mad cuz i dont agree with you
well im just expressing my oppinoin and insults arent evr funny i wasnt evn trying to be funny its the truth fed is a cry baby. both r extremely great players but nadal can beat federer whn healthy.
First, Federer isn't a crybaby; like a man cannot cry and stay a man...
And, Nadal's knee doesn't make him unfortunate; he is the very cause of his problems. His motion which is far from being as fluent as Federer's makes him injury prone. If you had the fact he pushes these shot with muscles rather than technic, it makes it really risky.
Notice how he suffers pain often on hard court. Injuries doesn't show brilliance, but an overpushed wrong motion.
Nadal is a very good player, but he's far from hitting as well as Federer. No matter the taken shot, Federer's motion is more elegant, mroe fluent, more graceful, more efficient.
Also, Federer has a WAY more light footwork than Nadal's.
Federer's play is bio mechanically way superior to any tennis player in history. And he's more complete than any of them and has more titles. The only thign you can hodl against him is a head to head reccord...
Which is mostly played on clay where Nadal's spin and lefty racket handlind worth more.
13-7 Nadal you say, I say 5-4 Federer on any other surfaces.
This mere H 2 H doesn't worth much...
Now, if you started to be logical rather than trying to impress with sophistic and present lesser subjective ideas, perhaps this unuseful war would end.
well thts wat makes nadal different, u ppl reject him cause his style IS different i dont care if his motion is more elegant or anything all tht matters is tht it gets the job done. federer is way to stubborn he thinks tht his style is the best and rarely changes it up. unlike nadal and murray
What matters is not to get the job done; what matters is getting it done for a long time and stay injury free. And what I tell you is that he isn't well coordinated and fluent enough for how much he pushes it and that makes him injury prone, therefore not having a motion has Federer's.
Federer isn't stubborn; he actually understands he is probably the player who uses the least energy to produce the shots.
You can change many things, but it must be respect certain things.
you obviously havent seen brugera hit live, to say that he even comes close to nadal's ball is almost a joke. yes some of it is technology, strings, wide body rackets etc. but rafa's ball is the heaviest of all time, i watched rafa at aus open this year and his forehand is unbelievable, make sure u know what your talking about before making outlandish comments like this one buddy.
Nadal is simply not as perfectly coordinated and not as fluent as Federer.
He doesn't moves as lightly and where your technic lacks, you have to put a mortgage on your body and use more of your energy to compensate.
It's not a big problem, until you reach your body's limit like pros, and espacially Nadal with such an energetic play. He pushes it too much for what he can handle and this causes him injuries.
This is about footwork. And, yes running after everything is either due to footwork faults, using a wrong strategy, missing your stroke or wrongly judging the ball(trying to ru na ball he doesn't manage to get to).
But, this must be added to his technical problems. They aren't so big, so obvious, but when you push the shot as hard as he does, they become considerably risky.
Federer is much more successful than Nadal, and he does use much less effort per stroke, and he does have lighter footwork, where Nadal's western style is prone to tendonitis everywhere. Nadal is the clay king, but Federer will be much more successful in the end. Fed can create almost magical angles and shots. By the way, Federer can and does change it up often. He's very flexible with his spins and shots, and though his (and no ones) topspin will be great like nadal's, fed is still better.
void my ass nadal's knees were hurting idiot thts y he lost to soderling. look at it this way nadal crushed soderling last time they played and so did federer so all federer had to do was beat an already nervous soderling.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
How does somebody get called the best player on the planet, and he gets beat by Monfils not even reaching the SFs? And I think losers only spell losers "loosers" Just get the fuck off Youtube YoSoyZuri you whore.
I can spell it as I please, I am not english!! Maybe you can try to spell Spanish for us!! Give it a try! LOL Maybe you still refuse to accept Rafa as the best but don't argue with us, do it with all the experts who call him the best. The best player in the planet is how they refer to him at the AO! Don't tell me about it; I only repeat what others that know much more than me say!!!!!
it's called good days and bad days, maybe he's tired? he did win wimbledon, french, olympic gold, and australian open, and he did all that in one year
roddick beat rafa in dubai in 2008, andy played well considering he was coming back from an injury, nadal was red hot and very match tough having just won paris, so the only shit head here is you for not recognizing these facts..
@dud321xyz fuck you fucking retard nadal fans....a lot of people just hate nadal......why do you bring up fed name when he talked about nadal....get a respect!
polychronio 3 months ago
Roddick all day. Go USA
bogeyhitter25 1 year ago 16
As you can see I'm not fond of him but why is that?(not just because I'm a Federer fan)
I tell you:
1.He grunts like a whore! (grunting is very uncommon among male players anyway!)
2.He often fakes injuries! (that's not very sportsmanlike)
3.He grimases like a retard.(that pisses me off the most!)
4.He's rubbing his pants all the time.(he should change sizes)
5.He doesn't play elegant tennis.
You can hate me for writing these FACTS but they are all facts!
SSJPeter 1 year ago
@SSJPeter Oh, so now you are getting personl?
1. So what. WHo cares? Many players grunt louder than he does.
2. Fakes injuries? HE NEVER GIVES UP! Why would he fake his injuries?
3. Mearly just a stupid opinion of yours.
4. Nervous habbit. He can't help it.
5. How can he not be elegant if he got to the top.
And you call these facts? The only fact you wrote on here is that he rubs his pants. Everything else is your OPINION. You wouldn't know a statement that's a fact if it bit you.
Rafathaman94 1 year ago
1. Name me 5 players in the tour who grunt louder than Nadal. Still an awefull habit, I've seen him keep his mouth shut when he plays an important point.
2. He does fake injuries. Why did he take medical timeouts after being 1-2 down in sets vs Peztschner and Haase, won both matches and went on to win the championship? Was he just cautious or was it a dirty trick?
3. He does grimace a lot, especially when he's losing as if he was to say "How dare you beat me!"
4.Too bad
5. Yep, not elegant
89Pleasek 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@89Pleasek
1. Ferrer, gonzalez, murray,djokovic(at times). And who really cares? It's not that bad of a habbit. Almost every player grunts at sometime, including fed.
2. You couldn't prove it. And when does nadal ever lose to players out of the top 50 within the last 2 years.
3. You couldn't prove that either. Name one time.
5. Who cares?
Who the hell are you to question a world #1?
Rafathaman94 1 year ago
"5. How can he not be elegant if he got to the top."
This is what you said. Then I said "Yep, not elegant" and your response was "Who cares"? Did you change your mind in a split second? This is another example how retarted nadaltards are.
As for Nadal omfg if he's the no 1 player does that forbid me from critisizing him? When Rios got to no 1 did everyone keep their mouth shut because he was the no 1 even without a single slam on his account?
89Pleasek 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@89Pleasek Whatever dude. Your opinion is your opinion. I like Nadal and you don't. It's really not worth arguing with you. Nadal is a great player and should be respected, even if you are the biggest fed fan/Nadal hater.
Rafathaman94 1 year ago
@Rafathaman94 dude, YOU need to respect fed, these 2 dudes are good friends, all the top tennis players are just a group of rich millionares, its all about money. the "rivalries" and blah blah they do care about of course, but it's about the money.
cj397 1 year ago
@cj397 I DO respect Fed. He's even one of my favorites. I don't respect people like you who are Federer loving biased a***holes that hate nadal. Maybe YOU should respect Nadal more? Ever thought of that? And what is with you and this "it's all about the money" crap. Dude, THEY LIKE TO WIN! Not get money. If the money was taken away, they would still try as hard because most tennis players LIKE TO WIN! When Fed cried at the AO, did he cry because he couldn't beat Nadal or because he didn't get $?
Rafathaman94 1 year ago
"how can he not be elegant if he got to the top"
I mean how retarded can you be, what does 1 thing have to do with the other? Muster got to the top, was he elegant? Hell no! He grunted like a slaughtered pig each time he hit the ball, moved ugly. Nadal is at the bottom of the list of the most elegant players who got to no 1. Edberg was an elegant player, McEnroe was, even goddamn Sampras to some degree, now Federer. Nadal is definately not an elegant player, put that in your empty head
89Pleasek 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@89Pleasek Who cares if a player is elegant or not? As long as they have a good playing style to win touraments, it really doesn't matter.
Rafathaman94 1 year ago
1. There is actually a difference between grunting "sometime" and doing it permanently whatever shot you're playing (including easy putaway volleys or dropshots, very energy demanding!"
2. You can't prove shit that he didn't as well. Everyone knows Nadal's dirty tricks, he got 2 warnings at Wimbledon this year, one for coaching and 1 for wasting time between serves. Guess that's just a coincidence.
3. 2007 Wimbledon vs Federer, check the last few games or check any match in which he's losing.
89Pleasek 1 year ago
And by the way he skips barcelona that's -500 points so next week he will have 6480 points and he still has to defend 1600points until Roland Garros.
OK I must admit he probably will be in the top 4 when Roland Garros starts.
But let's see if he could at least beat an in-form top 10 player in the next few weeks.
SSJPeter 1 year ago
@SSJPeter 500 points are no that valuble to Nadal. Why shouldNadal waste his time in a silly 500 event when he should be focusing on the French open. And he WILL BE IN THE TOP 4 GUARENTEED!
Rafathaman94 1 year ago
The last time Nadal beat a top 10 player was in Madrid when he beat Djokovic in the semi final.
Since then he only beat players outside of the top 10.
Look into it.
It is suprising but it is true!
Yes,he has just won Monte carlo but he never faced a top 10 player.
SSJPeter 1 year ago
@SSJPeter Yeah, well the top 10 players could not get far enough to face nadal, so chances are, Nadal would have beaten the top players.
Rafathaman94 1 year ago
@SSJPeter You're a moron. Get some help you angry little girl.
Rafathaman94 1 year ago
@SSJPeter HAHA! And now he just ousted the greatest player of all time. OUCH!
Rafathaman94 1 year ago
@Rafathaman94 Due to luck and that shit score counting system.
Federer won 46 points while Nadal just 45.
SSJPeter 1 year ago
@SSJPeter Yeah, and WON! Fair and square. OUCH!
Rafathaman94 1 year ago
@Rafathaman94 Nadal played well but he wasn't at his peak.
Federer played well but he wasn't as his peak.
However it was close and Federer has just started to play well again so Roland Garross will be even closer....and when both at their peaks Federer is always better on grass.
SSJPeter 1 year ago
lol that isnt any good my friend at north woods high school is much better....where do these guys go to skool..it looks like a champion match and i must say it looks like they are both horrible rofl my friend would kill them both especially that 1 guy who cant even hit the ball rofl he sucks his highschoo,must suck to make the team rofl wow north woods 4 life btch
Patriot2572 1 year ago
Drug cheat ? Fuck you,Rafa has never cheated with drugs!
JazzMJFAN 1 year ago
It doesn't matter his age or his record against the great Swiss. Federer has the numbers. Nadal is annoying, a bore to watch play, a one-dimension player that has only one trick in the book: plays relentless tennsi, because he knows he will never get tired (due, propably, to the use of illegal substances). His ambition is endless, vicious, when he loses you can see how angry he is when "shaking hands" with his opponent. He is obssessive and is not an example at all.
msouzafon 1 year ago
How dare you insult one of the best players in the world like that? What the hell are you talking about? Banned substances? Federer is angry when he loses matches to. You obviously don't know anything about nadal!
Rafathaman94 1 year ago
I always root for Federer against Nadal, but that doesn't mean I'm still not a huge fan of Rafa. His game is a true marvel, and he has given us some of the best matches in tennis history; I still get giddy just thinking of his showdown with Verdasco at the 2009 AO. I truly hope he recovers from his grueling style of play, although I am not optimistic seeing that he has not been the same player for over a year now despite being in his physical prime. Vamos Rafa!
patriotscheme 1 year ago
You're an idiot.... if you are nadal's biggest fan, then why do you insult him? (sarcasm or not) I'd say I am a bigger fan of nadal than you are.
Rafathaman94 1 year ago
nadal is not less succesful then federer DRKvideo. At rafas current age federer had only won 2 or 3 grand slams and nadals won 6 with the most of last year out.
ampzvirdee 1 year ago
THANK YOU! That is the exact reason why Nadal IS BETTER than federer. Nadal accomplished more at a younger age. People keep forgetting that Nadal is 5 YEARS YOUNGER THAN FEDERER! Nadal is more succesful than federer!
Rafathaman94 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nadal is younger than Federer but Nadal will never accomplish that much like Federer!
NEVER!
He hasn't won a title for almost a year now!
He is finished!
If he screwed up this year's clay season he will fall back to number 6.-7.-8. in the ATP rankings!
He has to defend more than 3500 points from Indian Wells to Madrid and I'm sure he won't!
He can't.
These are pure facts.
SSJPeter 1 year ago
GIVE HIM TIME! He is only 23, and he has accomplished a lot, nadal is capable of winning more titles. NEVER SAY NEVER!
Rafathaman94 1 year ago
@ SSJPeter "I'm sure he won't! He can't. These are pure facts." How is that pure facts? The future never happened yet. Nobody knows for sure nadal won't defend his titles he won from Indinan Wells to Madrid. It is a fact that you are just stating opinions. Maybe Nadal won't win as much as federer, but that does not mean he can't win more titles.
Rafathaman94 1 year ago
@SSJPeter Oh and look at that, nadal just won Monte Carlo only dropping 14 games!
Rafathaman94 1 year ago
Federer's game is pure talent. Such players always need to mature in order to perform in 100%. Nadal's game is physical and very tactically based. Thus, Nadal had to be successfull earlier when compared to Federer, otherwise, he wouldn't be successful at all, just because of the physical limitation his style will put upon him.
Henrii01 1 year ago
What did Nadal ever do to you that you have to insult him in all your videos? YOu know nothing about tennis!
Rafathaman94 1 year ago
"spanish drug cheat" 100% agree
destoroy4 2 years ago
Nadal is the best
NeverLose11 2 years ago
ahohepa u must be the biggest idiot on the planet !!! NOOB !!!!
AzaxSyndrome1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Tenis is the gayest sport ever u Irish fag. XD I think u want thai boxer to be fags like u. But thea not XD
U fat homo....are an your moms a hoe. Did ur dad touch u as a Boy or did he wait till u were old enough. XD
ahohepa 2 years ago
How is he a cheat!
To insult is free I guess.
abravonu 2 years ago
YoSoyZuri just get THE FUCK OFF YOUTUBE. Nobody needs to hear your fucking tired and exaggerated shit about Nadal. Just go you fucking pathetic slut.
THES0L0IST 3 years ago
The soloist, who the hell are you to tell anyone here to get out of youtube, you idiot!! Is it yours?
So, put up or shut up!!
YoSoyZuri 2 years ago
lol come on this is so ridiculous...Roddick is good but CLEARLY nowhere near as good and versatile as Nadal..he'll never be as good as a Nadal or a Federer, his speed, groundstrokes, placement, volleying, etc...are not EVEN close..how are you even debating this; Roddick hasn't won a grandslam in 6 years. Rafa just won two last year, an olympic gold medal and has won 5 grandslams total. He is 22. lol I'm an American but seriously let's be sensible here, Roddick's not a better player.
SpaceClav3737 3 years ago
SpaceClay, Rafa has won 6 Grand Slams. All minus one against Federer and in all surfaces. He has beaten Fed 13/19 times in all surfaces too. Rafa has now won GS in every surface (something Roger couldn't). And Rafa has broken all sorts of tennis records; already matched the great Borg on clay titles. Looking at what Rafa has done at 22 everyone else (except Fed) looks insignificant.
YoSoyZuri 2 years ago
Comment removed
SpaceClav3737 2 years ago
dude I dunno if you are arguing with me or just correcting me what? obviously when I wrote that Rafa had not won the Australian yet. I think we're on the same side here I am definitely agreeing to the fact that Rafa is probably the best player in the world right now and one of the best in history. he is unbelievable. maybe you should read my post again. Federer is and always will be my favorite player but he just cannot beat Rafa right now.
SpaceClav3737 2 years ago
hahahah!
rafael nadal will never be as great as federer. and with what just happened this weekend, it makes your argument void.
chrism216 2 years ago
he already is
liampimp12341234 2 years ago
wrong
BarelyListening15 2 years ago
no, ur just o stubborn to admit tht ur crybaby federer has been left in the dust by nadal. but fed can beat nadal if nadal's knees werent hurting. otherwise noone can beat a heathy nadal
liampimp12341234 2 years ago
ok stop insulting its not funny
im not going to say naal isnt great but in terms of tennis greatNESS, federer is greater b/c he has the grand slam and 5 wimbledons and 5 us opens in a row
if nadal could stay healthy, i think he could become the greatest ever without a doubt, but thats part of being a great tennis player as well
so dont get all annoying and get mad cuz i dont agree with you
BarelyListening15 2 years ago
well im just expressing my oppinoin and insults arent evr funny i wasnt evn trying to be funny its the truth fed is a cry baby. both r extremely great players but nadal can beat federer whn healthy.
liampimp12341234 2 years ago
First, Federer isn't a crybaby; like a man cannot cry and stay a man...
And, Nadal's knee doesn't make him unfortunate; he is the very cause of his problems. His motion which is far from being as fluent as Federer's makes him injury prone. If you had the fact he pushes these shot with muscles rather than technic, it makes it really risky.
Notice how he suffers pain often on hard court. Injuries doesn't show brilliance, but an overpushed wrong motion.
GueorguiJoukov 2 years ago
Nadal is a very good player, but he's far from hitting as well as Federer. No matter the taken shot, Federer's motion is more elegant, mroe fluent, more graceful, more efficient.
Also, Federer has a WAY more light footwork than Nadal's.
Federer's play is bio mechanically way superior to any tennis player in history. And he's more complete than any of them and has more titles. The only thign you can hodl against him is a head to head reccord...
GueorguiJoukov 2 years ago
Which is mostly played on clay where Nadal's spin and lefty racket handlind worth more.
13-7 Nadal you say, I say 5-4 Federer on any other surfaces.
This mere H 2 H doesn't worth much...
Now, if you started to be logical rather than trying to impress with sophistic and present lesser subjective ideas, perhaps this unuseful war would end.
GueorguiJoukov 2 years ago
well thts wat makes nadal different, u ppl reject him cause his style IS different i dont care if his motion is more elegant or anything all tht matters is tht it gets the job done. federer is way to stubborn he thinks tht his style is the best and rarely changes it up. unlike nadal and murray
liampimp12341234 2 years ago
This is actually an unthought answer...
You found your point upon difference. You know, bio mechanics works the same for everyone. Some exploit it, others don't.
Some movements can be different, but you don't seem to realize how this works.
Federer's elegance and gracefulness comes from a flawless fluidity which makes it almost effortless. He is THE most fluent player on the tour.
I don't depreciate Nadal upon like or because of his style, but because of a bio mechanic understanding.
GueorguiJoukov 2 years ago
What matters is not to get the job done; what matters is getting it done for a long time and stay injury free. And what I tell you is that he isn't well coordinated and fluent enough for how much he pushes it and that makes him injury prone, therefore not having a motion has Federer's.
Federer isn't stubborn; he actually understands he is probably the player who uses the least energy to produce the shots.
You can change many things, but it must be respect certain things.
GueorguiJoukov 2 years ago
Nadal puts effort into his shots but he produces the most top spin of ever tennis player in history by a fair margin.
davenavarroforpm 2 years ago
Nope, brugera can match nadal for spin.
EscapedC0nvict 2 years ago
you obviously havent seen brugera hit live, to say that he even comes close to nadal's ball is almost a joke. yes some of it is technology, strings, wide body rackets etc. but rafa's ball is the heaviest of all time, i watched rafa at aus open this year and his forehand is unbelievable, make sure u know what your talking about before making outlandish comments like this one buddy.
TennisAnalyst 2 years ago
Nadal is simply not as perfectly coordinated and not as fluent as Federer.
He doesn't moves as lightly and where your technic lacks, you have to put a mortgage on your body and use more of your energy to compensate.
It's not a big problem, until you reach your body's limit like pros, and espacially Nadal with such an energetic play. He pushes it too much for what he can handle and this causes him injuries.
GueorguiJoukov 2 years ago
true i would suggest to nadal not to run after evrything, but it isnt technic its cause he uses so much wasted movement
liampimp12341234 2 years ago
This is about footwork. And, yes running after everything is either due to footwork faults, using a wrong strategy, missing your stroke or wrongly judging the ball(trying to ru na ball he doesn't manage to get to).
But, this must be added to his technical problems. They aren't so big, so obvious, but when you push the shot as hard as he does, they become considerably risky.
I was mostly thinking about his forehand swing.
GueorguiJoukov 2 years ago
jeez u no alot lol
liampimp12341234 2 years ago
was that sarcastic or honest?
GueorguiJoukov 2 years ago
honest lol
liampimp12341234 2 years ago
Well considering his records...I guess you could argue that his style IS the best.
daraemkar 2 years ago
Federer is much more successful than Nadal, and he does use much less effort per stroke, and he does have lighter footwork, where Nadal's western style is prone to tendonitis everywhere. Nadal is the clay king, but Federer will be much more successful in the end. Fed can create almost magical angles and shots. By the way, Federer can and does change it up often. He's very flexible with his spins and shots, and though his (and no ones) topspin will be great like nadal's, fed is still better.
DRKVideoProductions 2 years ago
void my ass nadal's knees were hurting idiot thts y he lost to soderling. look at it this way nadal crushed soderling last time they played and so did federer so all federer had to do was beat an already nervous soderling.
liampimp12341234 2 years ago
You big loosers!!! Rafa .. champion "called at Doha --the best player in the planet" hehehehe.. Vamos!
YoSoyZuri 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
How does somebody get called the best player on the planet, and he gets beat by Monfils not even reaching the SFs? And I think losers only spell losers "loosers" Just get the fuck off Youtube YoSoyZuri you whore.
THES0L0IST 3 years ago
I can spell it as I please, I am not english!! Maybe you can try to spell Spanish for us!! Give it a try! LOL Maybe you still refuse to accept Rafa as the best but don't argue with us, do it with all the experts who call him the best. The best player in the planet is how they refer to him at the AO! Don't tell me about it; I only repeat what others that know much more than me say!!!!!
YoSoyZuri 2 years ago
it's called good days and bad days, maybe he's tired? he did win wimbledon, french, olympic gold, and australian open, and he did all that in one year
TibxB0i 2 years ago
emmm no
he did not win australian open in 2008 you sucker
seidl01 2 years ago
are you retarded? you must not know tennis
he's won the aussie open 3 times, when did TibxB0i say 2008?
iRanzed 2 years ago
"he did win wimbledon, french, olympic gold, and australian open, and he did all that in one year "
he said he did win all in one year....
but nadal didn't won the aussie open in 2008
(sry bad english)......
seidl01 2 years ago
maybe he meant one actual year, not necessarily the same one.
yorrrsh 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Where is the "mighty" guy now?
YoSoyZuri 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This ignorant american shit-head didn't know that Nadal wipped the Queens' court with Roddick! The great Spaniard show that big head how's done!
YoSoyZuri 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
correction, "maybe Irish" shit-head!!
YoSoyZuri 3 years ago
roddick beat rafa in dubai in 2008, andy played well considering he was coming back from an injury, nadal was red hot and very match tough having just won paris, so the only shit head here is you for not recognizing these facts..
reefric 3 years ago
hahaha ..yeah man ,you´ve done a realistic description of that pathetic spanish dog face¡ hahah
do you have more points? that´s a good position of the camera¡
lanceloter 3 years ago
HOW STUPID U R!
81ley 3 years ago
Who needs deluded americunts ?? OR Australian dingos like you here, go home!! lol
YoSoyZuri 3 years ago
british people should probably be scorning you...
why don´t you come back to your dirty and poor town ,eh ? fagot español coño
lanceloter 3 years ago
'pathectic spanish wimp' lmao u do realise ur talking abt the best most amazing player in the world there!
ninzninz2 3 years ago
ninzninz, subcribed to "icficf9" who insults Rafa????
YoSoyZuri 3 years ago
AWESOME THANKS 4 POSTING!
ninzninz2 3 years ago 5