The beatles were a great part of my memory's growing up in twickenham middlesex
in the sixties,buying there 45 rpm records.Im a Singer song writer,Musician,moved to
Canada bc In 1975 And started my own Beatles tribute band, Called the Hornet's.I just wrote and Recorded a Tribute song for John Lennon and the Beatles Called
I really enjoyed Paul in this movie... Gary Bakewell, the boy who played him, was really like him! I enjoyed the movie too, it's very nice to see the Beatles before all that fame.
THIS IS NOT RIGHT... THEY MADE THE BEATLES SOUND LIKE A HARD ROCK BAND, AND NOT THE CLASSIC SOUNDING BAND THEY WERE... YOU WANNA SEE GREAT ACTING OF THE BEATLES WATCH NOWHERE BOY... NOW THAT'S AN AWESOME DISPLAY OF TRUE BEATLE MUSIC (EVEN THOU IT IS THE QUARRYMEN) BUT IT STILL THE BEATLES
Guys this film is SHITE , im watching it now nothing like John lennons personality , made him look like a MUG.. Like this so people dont waste there money
Yes, it was unfair of me to say that because he was on hiatus for five years until he wrote "Starting Over" in 1980. But by 1975, "Stand By Me" had been his last single. Despite his success with the single, "Imagine", critics were tepid toward the album (Rolling Stone bit the hand that once fed them by accusing him of posturing). He co-wrote Bowie's "Fame", but if he wasn't being eclipsed, he was receding. He was a living icon & for a lot of people icons are never washed up.
@joshjhutton it's rated r because The Beatles were extremely involved with drugs and sex with people they've only met for 90 seconds, just like jim morrison!
if u watch the movie, it kinda hints that stu would have been kicked out regardless of if he met astrid or not. paul reckoned he was a better bass player than stu, and he didnt want to be in a band with 3 guitarists
I think that's not the same anymore. People know the problems Beatles had or about the acid trips or how some of their songs were written when they were stoned.
I watched it!!!!! The movie was sooooooooooooooooo sad that I nearly cried. It's a movie that I love to hate, hate to love, hate to hate and love to love. Only because Stuart died in the end. I always get paranoid at the end that I'll have an aneurism. Yeah, scary stuff. OH, btw, send any comments to ILoveLiverpuddlians. I'm on my friend's youtube.
it was amazing but i think they had to call it "Stuart Sutcliffe ", because it was focusing on Stu's life more than the beatles ... and Stephen Dorff gave an outstanding performance
Great film on the early part of The Beatles career in Hamburg. All the cast did a fantastic job especially Ian Hart and Stephen Dorff as Lennon and Sutcliffe.
The music, the clothes and the attitude are all inspiring..
I havent seen this movie since it was first released but I loved it! The characters of Lennon, Astrid, and Sutcliff were well played. Great storyline, you forget that this was about the greatest rock band in history. In fact the name "Beatles" was only mentioned once (in the dialog in this trailer).
I think this is a good british film. the director now makes movies in Hollywood and what more can I say about Ian Hart! I filmed an interview with one of the film's producers Nik powell. take a look at my channel
In one of millions leyends about the beatles, it´ told about the "sexual favor" of lennon from epstein. Everyone knows about the homosexualy of beatles´s manager. In this leyend, lennon acces to brian touch him, (nothing more) just like a price for the exit of the beatles. Ín the movie exploited that ambivalency of john. in my opinion john was not a gay (perhaps bisexual). why? in the seventies nobody talks about any scandal homsexual in that john´s involucred.
Okay, I have seen part 1 of this on YouTube but when I went to go and watch it today all there was was the video diaries. What the hell???? Does anyone know why this is?????
This movie gives us the real answer to John & Yoko. Lennon idealized the relationship between Stuart Sutcliffe & Astrid Kircher. They had been bohemian artists who adored each other & John couldn't have that kind of relationship with Cynthia. Stuart quit the Beatles to pursue the loves of his life - painting & Astrid - and the two didn't compete for his attention. On the contrary, it all seemed to merge together in a very natural way that made Stuart a transcendant figure in John's mind.
Woah. I think you just blew my mind with that. I never thought of it that way.
Seriously, I've been wondering for a long time why I think of John and Yoko's relationship as completely right and completely wrong at the same time. You gave me something to think about, for sure XD
Very well put. I hadn't thought of it in that way, but it would make sense.
John was said to always keep his close friends at hand, and his loss no-doubt affected John more deeply than he ever expressed, except perhaps in song.
In the movie, the lighthouse conversation between John and Astrid (rum) struck me as having a John and Yoko-esque quality in a what if? sort of way.
Astrid, is certainly a fascinatingly integral part of Beatle lore, and worthy of her own biography.
Once Brian Epstein died, The Beatles started breaking up & so John was ready to do a Stuart on the other Beatles. I think he'd always felt a great deal of ambivalence toward Stuart & Astrid. But I think he was bitter & resentful toward the others failure to empathize with him. Stuart was no big deal for them, but for John that event was deeply personal & meaningful. But the terrible irony is that no one could ever have imagined the similar fate that awaited him with his own early death.
@Yeaahright Suffice it to say that John failed to imitate Stu. The Beatles started unraveling the minute Brian Epstein died & it was Paul, not John, who filled his shoes & succeeded with Sgt. Peppers. By mimicking Stu, John found the perfect way to express his resentment but he paid the price because audiences wouldn't indulge his conceit. Yoko was ruinous to John as an artist & when he died, he was on the brink of being washed up. Gasp!
@bondurango well music wasn't enough for John, he was a real artist. While the others Beatles longed to go back to their families and settle down, he on the contrary left his wife and child, and Yoko did the same, to be a real artists. One of his only redeeming quality is that at least he was a real artist. I even forgive him for bad mouthing Paul and even his music with the Beatles. Only a real artist (not a businessman) can be as critical and not self-indulgent and content and smug.
Are you kidding? Of course it's rated R, there's alot of sex in it. It was a pretty good movie. The man who played John Lennon actually looked like Julian Lennon lol.
Interesting observation. I just saw this movie the other day and didnt realize it was so old (1994). Some actors looked ok, but the writers weighed story over looks.
John) Ian Hart looked ok and the voice, and Stephen Dorff as Stu looked great, but I too thought that the (John) actor gave off too much of a Julian vibe.
I think it was the eyebrows! The actors were too small, and not full like Johns. Overall an entertaining movie if youre not too stingy on bio-accuracy.
muito bom esse filme
PERCICAMARGO1 4 weeks ago
The beatles were a great part of my memory's growing up in twickenham middlesex
in the sixties,buying there 45 rpm records.Im a Singer song writer,Musician,moved to
Canada bc In 1975 And started my own Beatles tribute band, Called the Hornet's.I just wrote and Recorded a Tribute song for John Lennon and the Beatles Called
Everlasting Memory,Check it out on My Channel.
Chris J Marr
chrisjmarr 5 months ago
I really enjoyed Paul in this movie... Gary Bakewell, the boy who played him, was really like him! I enjoyed the movie too, it's very nice to see the Beatles before all that fame.
ccaarroolliinnee1000 6 months ago
I wanted to know more about Stuart, so that's why I watched this. I do think Nowhere Boy is better if you want to see a movie about John. R.I.P Stu.
newallthestars100 6 months ago
THIS IS NOT RIGHT... THEY MADE THE BEATLES SOUND LIKE A HARD ROCK BAND, AND NOT THE CLASSIC SOUNDING BAND THEY WERE... YOU WANNA SEE GREAT ACTING OF THE BEATLES WATCH NOWHERE BOY... NOW THAT'S AN AWESOME DISPLAY OF TRUE BEATLE MUSIC (EVEN THOU IT IS THE QUARRYMEN) BUT IT STILL THE BEATLES
DoubleS0312 7 months ago
Guys this film is SHITE , im watching it now nothing like John lennons personality , made him look like a MUG.. Like this so people dont waste there money
xEnZoProDucTioNz 10 months ago
j ai adoré ce film
lanroze 11 months ago
I hated this movie and Paul did too. Nowhere Boy is the best illrustation of John's life and the Early Beatles.
gamemasterzoomzoomom 1 year ago 2
This film is so cool!! It illustrates the pre-Beatles period very well! And I love Stuart's story although it's very sad. A very exciting film!
miramarachan 1 year ago
Stuart Sutcliffe was John's best friend, but i think Paul was a better influence to John.
WiltatKansas 1 year ago
@bobyoung53
Yes, it was unfair of me to say that because he was on hiatus for five years until he wrote "Starting Over" in 1980. But by 1975, "Stand By Me" had been his last single. Despite his success with the single, "Imagine", critics were tepid toward the album (Rolling Stone bit the hand that once fed them by accusing him of posturing). He co-wrote Bowie's "Fame", but if he wasn't being eclipsed, he was receding. He was a living icon & for a lot of people icons are never washed up.
bondurango 1 year ago
this movie was really about stu sutcliff and his influence on the group, and it shows a very close relationship between him and john..
wisesatyr72 1 year ago
the best!
ROSECROIX21 1 year ago
great and haunting movie
4yules 1 year ago
you need to read cynthia lennon book and you find out the true reason why they broke up
1365225 1 year ago
An underrated movie about an underrated guy, Stuart Sutcliffe.
Bickaa8012 1 year ago 2
Rated 'R' becaus theres boobies
joshjhutton 1 year ago
@joshjhutton it's rated r because The Beatles were extremely involved with drugs and sex with people they've only met for 90 seconds, just like jim morrison!
leatherfaze03 1 year ago 4
And Boobies
joshjhutton 1 year ago
i saw the live action performance of this film. it was pretty good.
ChokeslamKing 1 year ago
i went to see it last night, really didn't think it was much cop
tarff26 1 year ago
if u watch the movie, it kinda hints that stu would have been kicked out regardless of if he met astrid or not. paul reckoned he was a better bass player than stu, and he didnt want to be in a band with 3 guitarists
skacaulkie 1 year ago
Hey guys, for those of you who is looking for Backbeat the movie, it's been posted on youtube.
rendersen23 1 year ago
Comment removed
rendersen23 1 year ago
The trailer seems better than the actual movie. I've only seen a few parts of it and I don't think I would like it if I watched the whole thing :/
yeslauren 2 years ago
people jus tend tto think. OH the beatles a nice little pop rock band :).......nah! ;)
mrwelbourn 2 years ago
I think that's not the same anymore. People know the problems Beatles had or about the acid trips or how some of their songs were written when they were stoned.
Gary320 2 years ago
meh.. i spose ahah :)
mrwelbourn 2 years ago
the casting is really great. :D
pikopikochuu 2 years ago
Check out my vids of The Backbeat Beatles. You will spot Chris O'Neill.
ellendean 2 years ago
This is one of my favorite movies of all time!!!!!!!!
ledzep896 2 years ago
I don't understand why crap like Birth of the Beatles is on here in full but this masterpiece isn't.
makes no sense.
Eleanorigby1 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
splatterday 2 years ago
This movie is being shown on VH1 Classics tonight!
BeatleLover4243 2 years ago
I watched it!!!!! The movie was sooooooooooooooooo sad that I nearly cried. It's a movie that I love to hate, hate to love, hate to hate and love to love. Only because Stuart died in the end. I always get paranoid at the end that I'll have an aneurism. Yeah, scary stuff. OH, btw, send any comments to ILoveLiverpuddlians. I'm on my friend's youtube.
AlicelieThe5thEsq 2 years ago
waaa This film its great!
1Beatlemaniac1 2 years ago
i just finished watching this movie and i cried
Beatles4ever63 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why... the fuck... would someone make a movie about Stuart Sutcliffe? Whats next, a movie about Tim Staffell?
jackwc2 2 years ago
Wasn't JUST about him....
trinitymike 2 years ago
Yeh, i saw this movie
it was amazing but i think they had to call it "Stuart Sutcliffe ", because it was focusing on Stu's life more than the beatles ... and Stephen Dorff gave an outstanding performance
Raneem13 2 years ago
please post the full movie!!!!
tarkothegreat123 2 years ago
i didnt know stuart but i didnt like him in the movie
aghmpa 2 years ago
Great film on the early part of The Beatles career in Hamburg. All the cast did a fantastic job especially Ian Hart and Stephen Dorff as Lennon and Sutcliffe.
The music, the clothes and the attitude are all inspiring..
bobgrantsbus 2 years ago
Yeah, Paul said he thought it wasn't a good film, but he did say that the actor playing him gave a good performance.
His reasons consisted of the artistic license taken, John being shown singing Long Tall Sally, etc....
Hopefully a real biopic will get made someday.
MannequinSkywalker 2 years ago 4
I havent seen this movie since it was first released but I loved it! The characters of Lennon, Astrid, and Sutcliff were well played. Great storyline, you forget that this was about the greatest rock band in history. In fact the name "Beatles" was only mentioned once (in the dialog in this trailer).
turbotime1964 2 years ago
the guy who did lennon sounded like him.
andantinowithaswager 2 years ago 5
I think this is a good british film. the director now makes movies in Hollywood and what more can I say about Ian Hart! I filmed an interview with one of the film's producers Nik powell. take a look at my channel
niceguy2106 2 years ago
In one of millions leyends about the beatles, it´ told about the "sexual favor" of lennon from epstein. Everyone knows about the homosexualy of beatles´s manager. In this leyend, lennon acces to brian touch him, (nothing more) just like a price for the exit of the beatles. Ín the movie exploited that ambivalency of john. in my opinion john was not a gay (perhaps bisexual). why? in the seventies nobody talks about any scandal homsexual in that john´s involucred.
SulioBretz 3 years ago
jaja, capullo, aprende inglés! " involucred"? leyend? LOOOOOOOOOOOL
klugerhans 2 years ago
I think you'll find, that when it states 'Rolling Stone says....' it's referring to the american music magazine & not the rock group.
e8412561 3 years ago 3
HAHAHAHA
Stiletto92 2 years ago
Okay, I have seen part 1 of this on YouTube but when I went to go and watch it today all there was was the video diaries. What the hell???? Does anyone know why this is?????
ScousersRule7 3 years ago
OMG
1Beatlemaniac1 3 years ago
so wheres part 2?
whathoney73 3 years ago
This movie gives us the real answer to John & Yoko. Lennon idealized the relationship between Stuart Sutcliffe & Astrid Kircher. They had been bohemian artists who adored each other & John couldn't have that kind of relationship with Cynthia. Stuart quit the Beatles to pursue the loves of his life - painting & Astrid - and the two didn't compete for his attention. On the contrary, it all seemed to merge together in a very natural way that made Stuart a transcendant figure in John's mind.
bondurango 3 years ago 27
Woah. I think you just blew my mind with that. I never thought of it that way.
Seriously, I've been wondering for a long time why I think of John and Yoko's relationship as completely right and completely wrong at the same time. You gave me something to think about, for sure XD
livefortoday17 3 years ago
Very well put. I hadn't thought of it in that way, but it would make sense.
John was said to always keep his close friends at hand, and his loss no-doubt affected John more deeply than he ever expressed, except perhaps in song.
In the movie, the lighthouse conversation between John and Astrid (rum) struck me as having a John and Yoko-esque quality in a what if? sort of way.
Astrid, is certainly a fascinatingly integral part of Beatle lore, and worthy of her own biography.
libjen 3 years ago 2
Once Brian Epstein died, The Beatles started breaking up & so John was ready to do a Stuart on the other Beatles. I think he'd always felt a great deal of ambivalence toward Stuart & Astrid. But I think he was bitter & resentful toward the others failure to empathize with him. Stuart was no big deal for them, but for John that event was deeply personal & meaningful. But the terrible irony is that no one could ever have imagined the similar fate that awaited him with his own early death.
bondurango 3 years ago
@bondurango gasp, that is one hell of a realization.
Yeaahright 1 year ago
@Yeaahright Suffice it to say that John failed to imitate Stu. The Beatles started unraveling the minute Brian Epstein died & it was Paul, not John, who filled his shoes & succeeded with Sgt. Peppers. By mimicking Stu, John found the perfect way to express his resentment but he paid the price because audiences wouldn't indulge his conceit. Yoko was ruinous to John as an artist & when he died, he was on the brink of being washed up. Gasp!
bondurango 1 year ago 2
@bondurango well music wasn't enough for John, he was a real artist. While the others Beatles longed to go back to their families and settle down, he on the contrary left his wife and child, and Yoko did the same, to be a real artists. One of his only redeeming quality is that at least he was a real artist. I even forgive him for bad mouthing Paul and even his music with the Beatles. Only a real artist (not a businessman) can be as critical and not self-indulgent and content and smug.
Yeaahright 1 year ago
@Yeaahright
You are basically saying that being an artist is better than taking care of your family?
JustAdelaide 5 months ago
@JustAdelaide is it not??
ivan6194life 4 days ago
@bondurango Hhahahahahah, u don't know any thing. This movie was so wrong on so many parts. Specially around cynthia and john !
swegirl1000 1 year ago
i love this movie...that's really great...and astrid is so similar...
DizzyMissRomi 3 years ago 2
Are you kidding? Of course it's rated R, there's alot of sex in it. It was a pretty good movie. The man who played John Lennon actually looked like Julian Lennon lol.
AnnaCill 3 years ago 15
Interesting observation. I just saw this movie the other day and didnt realize it was so old (1994). Some actors looked ok, but the writers weighed story over looks.
John) Ian Hart looked ok and the voice, and Stephen Dorff as Stu looked great, but I too thought that the (John) actor gave off too much of a Julian vibe.
I think it was the eyebrows! The actors were too small, and not full like Johns. Overall an entertaining movie if youre not too stingy on bio-accuracy.
libjen 3 years ago
i didnt know backbeat was rated r
AeroBeatlesDoorsLed 4 years ago