Added: 3 years ago
From: monky999
Views: 11,572
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (192)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • So, what do we learn from this vile display?

    That bitter, militant homosexual atheists don't like vaginas? ALERT THE MEDIA!!

  • i still think this one the best sarah palin jokes ever. to bad she's well...pretty much....dead and gond. how about something about bachmann before she to disappears!

  • i think they were aiming the joke at bristol. she was retarded enough to get pregnant as a teen

  • dude, i agree it si great to make fun of sara palin.. but not at the expense of a child.. that's her level of conduct

  • I'm a conservative and I hate Sarah Palin :3

  • She is only a cheerleader for the crazy tea party.  she will never be smart enough to do anything more except yell catch phrases.

  • The joke bombed but I'm still anti Sarah Palin.

  • Not 100% out of mouth?

  • Thats AWESOME!

    

  • HAHAHAHAHAHA yeah i bet that's gonna sting republicans

  • I'm loving the swastika earrings on her at :50

  • wow another youtube video bashing sarah palin......im sure glad people like you voted in a president thatll make sure the government will take care of us.....if she woulda got in office, god! just think, we would have to wipe our own asses........dumbshit!

  • omg! those earrings! so she is a nazi. that explains so much

  • Trig is a BABY who can't decide who his mother is and didn't do anything to anybody. He has Downs Syndrome, a lot of people's children do. He doesn't need people like you insulting him for it. It's classless.

  • I don't like her one bit, but anyone who would make jokes about Trig's Down Syndrome is a classless jerk of the first degree.

  • burn

  • i disagree 100 percent of palin's mouth and mind is retarded. her child came out smarter.

  • perfect! i hope sarah and her pals see this! how can we get their response?

  • Um, it's spelled "vagina", not "vigana".

  • this is absolutely wonderful! and IT IS the funniest sarah palin joke out there! thanks, monky, for creating this, putting it up, AND LEAVING IT UP!

  • this is one of the best videos on the internet and anyone who says is' obscene or anything like that is obviously some sort for perverted republican tea bragger, wide stance in the airport men's room closet perverted sexual deviate with psychotic overtones. in other words, a typical Republican

  • We all know that Sarah Palin is pro-war. No one in her family believes in pulling out.

  • ok i hate sarah palin and all but if this joke was about her son with down syndrome, then thats jus mean. its not the childs fault that he has a ignorant mom

  • Truthfully I didnt know she had a child with down syndrome, I thouht it was making fun of the dumb twit daughter she has who got knocked up at 16. Either way this joke is still funny.

  • I agree. This joke is in really bad taste. Indeed, Sarah Palin is a complete idiot, but doesn't deserve this.

  • she may deserve it but her child does not!

    she is an idiot but the joke is truly tasteless!!! and not all that funny!

  • Wonderful! And Funny! LOL funny!!!

    Republicans are stupid assholes and the GOP is over. There will be a new party to the left of the Dems, and the Dems will be the new conservatives, with the republicans relagated to the role of the american nazi party or some such fringe joke. i hope bush kills himself and cheney gets to do the rope dance. rush, hope you OD you fat bastard. and the guy who's the head of the GOP is only there because his skin is black. he's a complete moron.

  • What a scary thought!

  • totally right on the money! Loved seeing the Hall Room Boys tell it like it is! LOL all the way to the bank!

  • He thinks it means that sarah palin's children are retarded because they come out of her vagina too

  • And they come out being kind of fucked up.

  • This is 100% BITCHEN!

    funniest thing since sarah palin herself. more! please give us MORE!

  • I thought he was going to say

    "Lipstick.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  • ....That works also! Pretty funny!

  • @monky999 What's "vigana"??))

    tell me you aren't palin's supporter, are you?))

  • people like to be upset with out reason havent u watched fox news b4

    besides its making fun of what she says and her dumb quotes more than ne thing else

  • she is really stupid and all but i have a brother that is like that and that really isn't funny making fun of a child

  • I love how this video plans for the future.

  • I agree with masudrules, Sarah Palin was a racist, ridiculous, absurd choice for VP. It demonstrates how out-of-touch Republicans are with the country. Sill, making fun of a retarded child is not appropriate.

  • lol that's so wrong.

  • I don't think Sarah Palin was, or is, ready to run the country, or even to run as Vice President; she is unaware of and lacks interest mostly in foreign affairs but some domestic ones too. She doesn't seem to have the necessary experience or qualifications to run the country,

    But I think this joke is extremely offensive to anybody. We should elevate the civility of our discourse, even when it comes to comedy.

  • how about this - bite me. civil enough for you?

  • dont be a pussy

  • hey if its appropriate to call borack obama a secret Muslim and a terrorist 4 no reason but campaign move then this is by far not as bad

  • @masudrules Neither did that worthless idiot named Barack Hussein Obama.

  • @ARepublicanVictory Well he certainly is much smarter than she is, more well-informed and articulate about foreign policy issues and certainly has a more conciliatory tone than she does. Granted, he had less executive experience than she does, (although now they're about equal) but it must be said that being the Governor of a State in which 80% of revenue comes from oil profits is good preparation for running Saudi Arabia, NOT the USA.

  • @masudrules How do you know? You know this how? He was a fucking community activist while she ran a fucking state. Just because the clueless left tells you something does not mean that it is true. Obama is the most over rated and least accomplished of any person to have ever run for president. She has done more than that bastard and she looks prettier too. OBAMA is a punk ass sissy that gets slapped around by his wife.

  • @ARepublicanVictory Actually, I wouldn't be surprised that even when he was a community organizer he had more responsibilities than she did. All she had to do in Alaska (the 4th smallest State) was distribute oil profits to about 700 000 people. That's it. Compare that with being the president of the Harvard Law Review, serving as a Senator for two years and being well-versed and articulate; there's no doubt Obama comes out on top.

  • @masudrules You can believe your own bullshit all you like. The prick just got lucky. We call it being at the right place at the right time. This prick will not be the next president. Most likely Mit Romney or Mike Huckabee will be the next president.

  • @ARepublicanVictory Luck always is a factor. But it played a larger role in Palin's case, given that she was selected by McCain for these OBVIOUS two reasons: 1. The hardcore right wing doesn't like McCain but certainly likes Palin 2. She's a woman, and this would somehow be able to dismiss the notion that the Republican party is sexist. Obama, on the other hand, worked on his 2004 Keynote speech, worked in the Senate and worked on his presidential campaign. None of which is related to luck.

  • @masudrules He was there at the right time. Sometimes I think this was a set up. Why didn't the Democrats chose Clinton?

  • @ARepublicanVictory What aspect of GW's presidency are you "ok" with? And what aspects of Obama's are you not ok with?

    How could it have been a set up?

    There are many reasons why Clinton wasn't chosen; obviously given the history of the USA, the fact that Obama is an African American is part of it. But it's also because Clinton was perceived to be part of the Washington establishment; her support for the very unpopular Iraq War, for example, exacerbated this.

  • @masudrules Obama is bi racial. His mother is White and father Black. He is not 100% Black. And second, Blacks born in America are not African. Africans do not want anything to do with Blacks born outside of Africa. Lastly, I worked two jobs under the Bush regime. Bush put a thrashing on Muslim terrorists while Obama allows Muslim terror to thrive. Obama is another sorry Carter. Obama allows Mexican thugs to cross border and kill Americans. He is anti American and evil. There are more examples.

  • @ARepublicanVictory The fact that he's biracial makes no difference to my argument. For the sake of argument, I just used the terms African-American and black synonymously.

    National security is one aspect in which Obama has changed very little. Has he changed anything about the Patriot Act? No. Is his foreign policy very different? No, just his tone; in fact, on Pakistan, he's much more aggressive than Bush was. Plus, Bush did those things at great cost (torture, war crimes, etc), not Obama.

  • @masudrules There is no proof of torture of war crimes. If so, Bush and some of the ones responsible would have been placed on trial. It was only hearsay from the anti American Left. That is how they act and what they do, attack the American military, the American church, patriots, and the traditional and proper way of life. Obama is still the most failed and the most anti American of any president since Carter. Obama even makes Clinton look right wing.

  • @ARepublicanVictory Actually, the proof is in Bush's OWN book (Decision Points), where he admitted to ordering waterboarding, which IS torture. The United States HANGED Japanese soldiers for waterboarding American prisoners of war in World War II. If that's not proof for you that it's torture, you're hopeless. Placed on trial by whom? The Republican controlled Congress? The Bush-controlled justice department? Look up Hamdan v Rumsfeld; a Supreme Court ruling is NOT hearsay.

  • @masudrules water boarding is not torture, but nice try-

    more nonsensical liberal hysteria gone awry-

  • @masudrules African American is the wrong term. He is mixed, as in bi racial. Second, Blacks vote Democrat because they believe this myth that this former anti Black party is to help them. They help keep Blacks poor with the race card and the constant games being played with the economic class system.

    Bush kept America safe. Under Bush, the unemployment rate was 5.7. UNDER OBAMA, it is twice that number. Obama has destroyed the U.S military with his pro fag stances.

  • @ARepublicanVictory Sorry, I didn't know that you were all-knowing. Hey, maybe you should inform blacks that you know what's good for them and they don't. They'll be infinitely grateful for your authoritative (and not-at-all-patronizing) advice!!

    In November 2008, BEFORE Obama took office, Goldman Sachs already predicted that the unemployment rate would reach 8.5 percent or higher by the end of 2009. Also, "under Bush" there was a massive, devastating recession you seem to have ignored.

  • @masudrules We will leave that up to Democrats. They are the ones who think for Blacks and tell them when to eat and how to vote.

    Obama said that it would never go beyond 9%. It did, and thus that was his first lie of many. Obama makes me SICK and I wish that he will die soon.

  • @ARepublicanVictory Obama isn't the only politician that's ever lied. Unfortunately, that's what many politicians do, which is why your implication that the Republicans somehow have a better record in this regard is ridiculous.  I'm not going to cite all the examples in the Bush administration of deceit; it would take too long. Sure, Republicans helped blacks a lot, but they also hindered them. Dr. King was a Republican then, and many would say that he would be crazy to be a Republican now.

  • @masudrules He would be a Republican because he did not like racism. Blacks who vote Democrat are racists. King was anti racism. Republicans battle racism and charges of racism at the same time. Democrats play the race card and get a pass. And Obama is the greatest liar I have seen since LBJ.

  • @ARepublicanVictory It's ironic that you mention LBJ, who passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the Fair Housing Act of 1968. His efforts freed African Americans to serve in government and vote. At the same time, the civil rights legislation forced a political realignment as the south abandoned the Democratic Party and African Americans abandoned the Republican Party. You can go on with your anti-Obama diatribes and talking points, but these are the facts.

  • @ARepublicanVictory So to conclude, (because you're only using talking points and not actually responding to the substance of anything I'm saying so as to render this discussion quite unfruitful) both Republicans and Democrats individually have done great things for blacks as well as caused them much harm. But on this issue, and on balance, I think it's quite clear that the Republican establishment (not all Republicans) is nothing but a ghost of Lincoln's Grand Old Party, which is quite a shame.

  • @masudrules Republicans have always helped Blacks. Democrats do not. They have done much harm to Blacks. Democrats should be disbanded.

  • @ARepublicanVictory Let's put it this way. The fact is that for quite some time now, Blacks have overwhelmingly supported Democratic politicians. Indeed, the first black president was elected as a Democrat. There are two possible explanations for this lack of support:

    a) The Republican party is perceived as out of touch by Blacks because of many of their actions.

    b) Blacks are stupid and duped and only ARepublicanVictory understands what is truly good for them.

    I go for a) and you go for b) .

  • @masudrules Blacks mainly support Democrats because of the welfare, government subsidies and the consistent overuse of the "race card" when ever they get shown up in the stats; they do more crime, are less educated, have more diseases per capita and are more of the unemployed. Democrats. The truth is the truth. And Black racism is not tolerated in the Republican Party which does have Black success stories.

  • @ARepublicanVictory You just proved my point; many of the policies put forth by the Democratic Party (welfare, subsidies, etc) are more adapted to the needs of the black population with the characteristics you just mentioned. So why is it again that blacks should vote Republican? Because there are a couple of "success stories"?

  • @masudrules Many of the policies do nothing but create more Blacks into poverty. How does that help? It does not.

    Republicans still have done more than the filthy anti American Democrats have. The Democrats are the party that put Blacks in the back of the bus. The Republican Party did not do that. The Democrats made Separate But Equal, the Grandfather Clause, Slave Codes, lynching, and Blacks excuse this filthy racist degenerate party? I love how these filthy socialists try to lie about that.

  • @ARepublicanVictory Sure, some policies help foster excessive (and harmful) financial dependence in the long-term, but some are just necessary because without them many people wouldn't be able to make ends meet. We do need a balanced approach to eradicating poverty (including amongst blacks, of course) but that certainly doesn't include referring to Democrats as "anti-American".

    Blacks don't excuse it, they just don't live in the past, as should you; both parties have changed. Deal with it.

  • @masudrules No, the Democrat party has changed. It went from a party of hating Black Americans to a party to hating patriotic Americans. The Republican Party has always been patriotic. It has always defended the rights of others. But the Republican Party follows the guidelines of the Bible always. The Democrats as taken over by the unpatriotic and anti American New Left has always attacked the Bible, one of the greatest books of guideline-living.

    Deal with it.

  • @ARepublicanVictory I'm not sure where in the Bible you can find the permission to torture, as Bush irrefutably did several times. In what Chapter do you find the injunction to be insidious and dishonest? (read: Nixon's Watergate scandal) Or what about Reagan's Iran Contra Affair? From what part of the Bible did he, the only US president to be divorced (running on Christian Family Values), draw inspiration for that shameful act?

    Face it: you're blinded by your partisanship.

  • @masudrules And the proof is where? I have heard this time and time again, yet not one proof of evidence. And if we are talking water boarding, we received this during Army basic training which is not torture. Sorry, no torture.

    I really do not care for the rest. Presidents must do things all in the interests of keeping their nation safe. So nice try with the selective bullshit there pal. Tell some one who cares.

  • @ARepublicanVictory Mind you, I have nothing against her personally; to the extent that I can know about her as something other than a political figure, she seems like a charming, down-to-earth, family-oriented person. She's just entirely unfit for the presidency in terms of her qualifications: she's not very articulate, her displayed knowledge of current events is lacking, and, more importantly, she seems to be intellectually incurious.

    And who cares how she looks? It's not a beauty pageant.

  • @masudrules Why do you people keep saying the same ole' garbage. I think the woman is just fine. Why elect a man who had no executive skill whatsoever then? Obama was not the greatest thing that ever crawled out to run for the presidency at all. And he is no Abraham Lincoln like these Leftist fools try to make him out to be. Lincoln was a Republican, not a sorry anti American Democrat.

  • @ARepublicanVictory Because executive experience is important, but it's not everything. G.W. Bush had five years of very significant executive experience as governor of the second largest State in the Union, and yet his presidency was a failure in many ways. Jimmy Carter was the governor of Georgia for four years before becoming president, and I don't think you consider him a good president.

    True, Obama is no Lincoln, but if Lincoln were alive today, I think he would have run against Palin.

  • @masudrules G.W Bush was ok to me. Obama not ok at all. Abraham Lincoln would have had Palin as a running mate today. Remember, the Republican Party was also behind women being able to vote and have driver's licenses.

  • @ARepublicanVictory Oh and one last thing; your historical comparison isn't valid. The political landscape of the American electorate starting shifting immensely in the early 1900's and was accelerated by FDR's New Deal; African-Americans, typically displaying a Republican partisan identification ("Lincoln Republicans"), started shifting to the Democratic Party, as the Republicans were out of touch.

    So although the Lincoln comparison isn't accurate, neither is your attempted refutation of it.

  • @masudrules Interesting, since Abraham Lincoln, Republicans have been there for blacks when it counted. Nevertheless, Democrats invariably take all the credit for the success of the civil rights movement and invariably fail to give any credit to Republicans.

  • @ARepublicanVictory The Republican's support for blacks has ebbed and flowed, as with Democrats. And both parties have been opportunistic when it comes to taking credit for positive events. However, the burden of proof is still on you to explain why blacks overwhelmingly support Democrats nowadays.

    What does being able to vote and have driver's licenses have to do with it? Just because Palin is a woman and Lincoln was a strong promoter of women's rights doesn't mean he would support her.

  • @masudrules I know why. Because of the welfare policies. Second, because of Democratic support of the Unions, especially within inner cities. Not to mention how the New Left infiltrated the Democratic Party and shifted it to the Left. What was the Republican Party to do? Pander to the New Left? The Republican Party is a patriotic party which does not stand for racism. They ended slavery and segregation. That is something the filthy anti American Left is trying to steal credit for.

  • @ARepublicanVictory True, but short term anti-engagement politics -- America First, the fight against the League Of Nations, etc. -- left the Republicans in a very sorry state. Perceived as wrong on WWI, wrong on the Great Depression, disastrously wrong on WWII...perhaps if the US hadn't won both wars and made it through the Depression (over Republican opposition), the party would have been able to maintain its general appeal, but that's not the way it worked out.

  • @masudrules Hey, at least the Republican Party was right about the Civil War. They kept the country together.

  • @ARepublicanVictory I can cite dozens of countries that have those "pro fag" (very adult way of referring to it by the way) stances in place (one of which is Israel by the way, one of the US's staunchest allies and one of the best armies in the world) Come on, I was just stating things as they are, I agree with some Republican ideas and some Democratic ideas, but the fact that you have to go back almost two hundred years to point to success shows that on some issues Republicans are out of touch

  • @masudrules Nope, I do not. Loo at the Civil Rights issues. Republicans helped Blacks. Democrats supported KKK and other evil things. The Rev. Dr. King was also a Republican.

  • @ARepublicanVictory Moreover, the Republican Party started out as progressive in that they wanted to end slavery. But coming to power during the civil war also made them the party of big business. There were no foundries in Cleveland in 1860 and dozens by 1865, all making cannon and rifle barrels for the army. It was essentially only a northern party. It took until Nixon's southern strategy in 1968 for any southerners to vote Republican. ("yellow dog Democrats")

  • @masudrules Republicans are still ok with me. What were they to do when the New Left invaded the Democratic Party?

  • @ARepublicanVictory I'm not a strategist, I don't know what the Republicans should have done, I can only observe what they did do and the consequences it had. It is a known fact that new issues arise and parties have to adapt. For example, when Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell emerged as prominent public figures in the early 80's, Republicans adapted their platform. It's as simple as that.

    Just saying "waterboaring is not torture" isn't an argument. I guess you have no counterarguments...

  • @masudrules I do have counterpoints. But because you say it is torture does not mean it is.

  • @masudrules Fuck her. She's an idiot who doesn't read, doesn't know her continents, doesn't know supreme court cases, and she wants to run this country? Also, she's an amazing hypocrite, because she made fun of the "Hollywood elite" the whole time she was running, then after she lost, she suddenly has a reality t.v. show, and her daughter goes on "Dancing With The Stars" (which Sarah showed up to and appeared on). Conservatives like this deserve to be attacked in any way possible.

  • @GodPrefersAnAtheist I agree with you 100% that she is completely incompetent and entirely unqualified to hold any public office (except maybe as Governor of a state in which 80% of its revenue comes from oil profits, and even then she didn't do a good job) And she has made many hypocritical and nonsensical statements. But I don't think "conservatives like these" deserve to be attacked in ANY way possible; just on substantive issues, otherwise we'd stoop to Hannity/Beck's ground-hugging level.

  • @GodPrefersAnAtheist Amen brother! :)

  • @masudrules thank you. we need more educated, opinion-baring liberals and conservatives. Republicans suck. Democrats suck. People use the excuse 'middle of the road' to vote for their party ticket instead of statistics learned through basic 20-min. research.

    and we should 'elevate civility,' because 12-yr-old kids come here to comment because their parents vote for party X, which they dont even know about, and use words i wouldn't use if i were dying. THIS is more abhorred than any politic.

  • even if Obama bombed his own country with nukes by accident, he would still be a better president than Bush.

    mcfossil shit his pants, palin drank down the corn shit & gulped for more,

    rick davis fingered all the palin kids while todd sucked old cum from cindys c=unt, how were they supposed to win ??

  • @HOsarahpalinisacunt Looks like your comments are a bomb. You do not have a clue. You are another sick and stupid leftist. I hope some Muslim terrorist kills you.

  • This is sick how can u talk about her son that way, how wood u like it if some one said the same of u or your mother, and this is cruel to all people with special needs, there friends and families and isnt just a simple misstated joke

  • Seems like just yesterday when sarahsakscunt palin was saying ''just how much in love these 2 kids were''&''how they had been planning

    on getting married for forever!''&of course we ALL remember the ''It's going to be a White House(oops we lost)/Spring/Summer

    Wedding!Sarah started this BS w/ her LIES! Bristol says abstinence is NOT realistic SarahsSaks statement says Bristol totally supports

    abstinence.Has Palin ever MET her OWN daughter?Arrange a photo-op w/Bristol,maybe Sarah will showup

  • ROFLMAO

  • lol i didnt notice the earings until i read your comment

  • LOL SWASTIKA EARRINGS

  • omg yes!

  • this is some funny shit! are those her real earrings? Wilde Shit!

  • this is retarded

  • ROFL...

  • uh i hope the earrings at the end are editied.. if not..

    wow.

  • haha didn't notice till u said that...they must be fake

  • omg that was soo messed up. but hilarious. and i like her earrings!!

  • Haha that was a nice one

  • By the way those earrings were edited right? The svastika earrings at 0:50

  • The earings were not edited. They were on loan from the Republican party and were returned after the election along with the rest of her wardrobe. I think they were donated by Cheney. Doesn't anyone here read the news?

  • i live in america but don't get my news from american sources...it's either watered down or juiced up....can't trust a thing off Fox, Cnn, or anywhere!!! was that in the news, about her earrings, tho, seriously?

  • yes! unreal isn't it!

  • Oy Vey

  • If anything, sense of humor comes first, then eventual emotional stimulus follows after.

    I truly hope they improve the science of neurology.

  • not sure the numbers that high but pretty acurate lol

  • hahahahahaha nice one buddy

  • wow!

  • she has a fucking nazi swastika ear ring in wtf?

  • I can not stop watching this! It has got to be the best thing on youtube!!!

  • WOW! Some of the people who comment on this are OK, but most of them sound like little old church ladies. The fact that they either don't get it, or understand what it's really about is a very sad comment on the intellectual development of the people on YouTube.

  • I watched this when it first came on the scene., and just watched it about 3 times in a row again. One thing I gotta say, Monky, it's just about the crudest video on You tube....and it's also just about the funniest!!!

    Keep it up! Love it!

  • I don't like Sarah Palin either, but at least use a real voice in your next video.

  • why

  • It just makes it more believable, and it just sounds ore ... natural, like you put more effort into it.

  • well...i'll get a good voice person & give it a shot. thanks.

  • Worst. Delivery. Ever.

  • yeah...i hear it was a c-section

  • You win this round...

  • you truly are fucked up this is just evil, and not funny at all. and i haven't seen so many typos since 2nd grade computer class.

  • the only thing good she has is her cutie.

  • making fun of Downs Syndrome? That's pure hate.

  • i don't get it.....

  • No shit! This is full on FUNNY...you Jesus freak assholes can just fade

    But can you imagine how horrible it would be if this moronic bitch was a heart beat away from that 72 year old, on the croke bastard McCain? Now, that wouldn't be so funny...

  • Oh, just shut up. Seriously, I've had enough of watching people calling Obama a, well, an N-Word and other racist stuff get mauled violently (and I'm not saying its right, they deserve to get mauled), while people call Sarah Palin a moronic bitch and McCain a bastard just get off scot free.

    Its hypocritical and you know it. More than hypocritical really, more like, pardon my language, a two-faced hypocritical lying piece of shit who deserves to punched so hard they lose their teeth.

  • say what??

  • well idc what u guys think, i know its wrong but its hilarious.

    everybody should learn how to take a joke.

  • sara palin a fat B and she no she is she gay and love to be gay and dont im me are your a fag and i well not im back

  • This is really, really horrible. No class at all, no redeeming quality to it whatsoever. I didn't vote Republican, didn't agree with a lot from them; but that has nothing to do with this; this is pure hatefulness.

  • what don't you like about it?

  • Comment removed

  • It felt like the "joke" painted a target on a parent's heartache, & on a baby that may never be able to defend himself. And all for a giggle.

    To me, the cost of that giggle was far too high: The (private) sorrow of the parents and the cost of a life lived w/Down's syndrome. A very high price.

    I was upset when I posted that. I'm sorry I didn't calm down before posting.

  • i love how YouTube is now a political comment arena. wow. btw, at 0:50 she's wearing a swastica earing: i knew there was some reason every intelligent constituent out there stopped backing the McCain ticket as soon as Putin, i mean Palin, sorry, joined.

  • This is FUNNIER THE SHIT! love it!

    Sending it out to the world. Still LOL!

  • are you a special needs child?

  • Comment removed

  • vas te faire encule, vas te faire encule

  • Ringrazi il dio per Babelfish

  • Rodger that Clem! Rodger that! No Shit & Damn Straight!

  • Was ist los mit Ihnen Frenchie

  • thats shitty

  • congradaga-fuckin-lations mr. jackass democrat! nice joke!

  • excellent! spot on

  • is this one of those grown up jokes?......i didnt get it.

  • No, its an ignorant democratic jokes. Because for some reason the only thing democrats can do is make jokes...

  • No, a joke is supposed to be funny. This wasn't funny, it was plain hateful. It was lower than low.

  • Yeah thats true! Its a failed lame attempt at a joke! haha

  • wadya no aboud id?

  • Be glad hon. It was someone who thought he was being funny, but it was just hateful is all. You're really better off if you don't get it (I wish I hadn't)

  • LOL....

  • fail!