100% of royal bullshit spewed by the RATigan. americans hate them. i know i do. not hate.......yes hate. they are murdering innocents and using our military to do it but the media has the people thinking they are freedom fighters.
Hari is right on. Britain is a democracy with a prime minister and elected representatives and does not need to hang on to the Queen and the monarchy. The Queen has no powers and is a waste of British taxpayers money! Get rid of the monarchy and those Islamofascists!
You need to indicate where I've said something ahistorical and how it negates my argument.
Your comment about legoland reveals that you miss the crux of the argument used by the chap in the video i.e. being a tourist attraction does not warrant being a head of state.
I despise everything about the royal wedding, especially the timing of it which is designed to distract from the abuses of the middle and working classes that are going on right now...on the other hand it brings in a ton of revenue to the country which dwarfs the twenty million quids of tax payers' money. Damned royals and their money-making ways.
The demand for and attendance to the street parties to celebrate this upcoming wedding can be used as a crude measure to gauge their popularity. This tentatively suggests that they are least popular in Glasgow which is the most populous city in Scotland.
I know you are tempted to take this as evidence for your hypothesis about the unemployed since Glasgow has a high unemployment of ~11% however the remainder of the population should create sufficient demand for street parties nonetheless.
An obscure reference to some poll without actually giving a link to it does not count as empirical evidence. Which poll? Who took the poll? How large was the sample? How was the data collected? Does the sample represent the full spectrum of British society?...
The Royals are so popular in Scotland that they're having the fewest street parties and none at all in Glasgow due lack of interest.
You loyalty is commendable especially after Prince Philip referred to your country men as drunks.
@Mite What does a street party have to do with the monarchys relevance? I dont remember the last time anyone hosted an NHS street party yet im pretty sure the majority of people wish to preserve it. If you are so concerned with the polling perhaps you should look into them or maybe you could ask mummy to spoon feed it to you. Good luck.
Profitable parasites that would be more profitable still after being humanely stuffed by a taxidermist and put on display as it would lower maintenance costs, just the odd dusting now and then is all that is required.
You can still sell the brand e.g. pencils, T-shirts and mugs to the other mugs willing to buy them. The tourists will still come to see the trappings of royalty stuffed or otherwise.
Alternatively we could auction them to the tourists so they can take them home as souvenirs
the queen as a symbol of democracy is a joke. her enumerated royal powers are expressly that of a dictator.
the fact that these quasi-dictatorial powers are exercised only nominally today does not preclude a future "king" or "queen" from choosing to wield the full dictatorial breadth of those powers.
"How about we research your geneology and see all of the people your ancestors fucked over and force you to repay the debts."
How about we research yours? You claim to have a family history spanning 800 yrs in Scotland. And that you "currently" live there. Conspicuously you did not mention that were actually Scottish (i.e. born there). In fact you sound more like an intolerable Yank trying to 'discover' his Scottish roots.
@SmiteTheUnholy Did I not mention that I was Scottish? Really? Not even in the exact comment your quoting the 800 years comment from? Perhaps you are correct, I forgot that your genetics consist mostly of sheep DNA,they dont have laws regarding crime do they? Mentally inadequate failure is failing.
You mean assumptions like those who dislike the monarchy are mostly unemployed "dole scroungers"?
No I can honestly say we have known rapists or interbreeding in our family. Is that a common thing in your circles then?
Your comparison is fucked in any case as these parasites still reap the profits of their ancestor's peccadilloes and demand respect for them to boot. And shit like you are only too willing to provide it.
"Every piece of land on this Earth are ill-gotten gains"
I whole heartedly agree but that is another subject for a different time. But my point is that such people are not worthy of the respect that servile scum such as yourself lavish upon them.
@SmiteTheUnholy Do you honestly believe your family is pure and angel like? Nobody in your family has stolen,raped or murdered? Delusional much? The fact of the matter is that times change,the only difference between the royals and your family is that they were far more succesfull. Whats your point? Youre just a bitter little man that wants what they have. How about we research your geneology and see all of the people your ancestors fucked over and force you to repay the debts.
Whether the monarchy is profitable or not is irrelevant since I primarily took issue with your ignorant comment about the unemployed. You are shifting the goal posts yourself dipshit.
Of what the fuck is William going to become the Duke of after this marriage? all the other positions are are taken. Duke of Ben Evis by any chance?
@SmiteTheUnholy The majority of Brits agree with having the monarchy and feel that it is still relevant. Looking back I should have said "in my experience" in regard to the opponents Ive met . These however are FACTS. Yet you respond with assumptions and petty comments about newspapers. I couldnt give a flying fuck about any royal title or activity so long as its profitable and doesnt cause undue suffering. You moved the goalposts,you inserted the bullshit and you failed miserably. GTFO.
Says the kid who erroneously concludes that most of Britain love the royals because his circle of friends do and makes 'Daily Mail-esque' claims that those who don't must be unemployed due to his confirmation bias.
Heaven forbid that you should ever be unemployed yourself or would you leach from mater and pater instead of the taxpayer?
"owners of the land are not entitled to any of the benefits?"
@SmiteTheUnholy Every piece of land on this Earth are ill-gotten gains you moronic waste of oxygen. Yes,your intellectual inadequacy. Its the reason you are feebly attempting to change the subject to benefits and ignoring the fact that the monarchy is profitable. The reason you remove the @ in the hope im not going to see your feeble minded response. I never said people who disagree with royalty are unemployed. This furthers your apparent mental inadequacy. Less sheep fucking more reading please
@SmiteTheUnholy The majority of Brits agree with the monarchy. Almost every poll and personal experience confirm that belief. Nothing you say has any basis whatsoever,your only retorts are either inaccurate or mentions of right wing newspapers. You really need to do better than this son,its pathetic.
"...income from royal estates paid INTO the treasury"
They don't earn money. They inherited vast estates from their ancestors who took them. Those estates could raise even more money without those parasites leeching from it to the tune of tens of millions. They are as redundant as the Pope's penis.
If you think having a thistle up your arse makes you representative of the majority then you need think again.
@SmiteTheUnholy So the owners of the land are not entitled to any of the benefits? Take your communist bullshit back to Russia. Your house could serve me much better if your parasitic arse didnt live in it. Why dont I just take it from you? I never said I was representative of the majority,im simply pointing out your intellectual inadequacy.
I am german,we are so happy that they ( the sachsen coburgs ) left for england and that we dont have to pay for them,I heard the wedding cost 48 000 000Euro
finally a brit with some sense. Also the only Americans obsessed with this royal BS is the American media that is trying to force this crap down our throats. What a shame
@eastsider4eva But I find inbreeding utterly disgusting (it happens among all royalty not just Brits) it is the the stupid, but it seems more as if YOU were the one trying to shut down the debate right away. Claiming my points are null and void, while these usurping leeches still tax half the western world & have servants wiping their asses for them. I don't stand for ANYTHING remember that next time you feel like being a dumb troll then maybe there could be a debate.
@eastsider4eva Alex Jones isn't my cult leader, matter of fact I don't even subscribe to his youtube channels because he hates on people that I look up to. I'm not sure that he hates German people, I certainly have no problem with the German people AT ALL. All I was really trying to say was that British royalty are inbred and not really Anglo-Saxon but Germanic (not that it matters & no this is not a conspiracy) I personally think the Germans are a great people with an amazing country & culture.
i'd rather have Britian's "royalty" and multiple candidates for actual leadership than the US's 2 party stranglehold of dictatorship of power. Their "kings and queens' don't really have political power--they're more like pop stars.
Monarchy is so overrated and stupid but I think all the radical Muslims pouring into the country might be a bigger threat to England than the Royal Family is.
This manhild has no clue as to what he is talking about. The vast majority of Britons are happy with the royal family and the vast majority of people who complain about them are brats on welfare who are barely literate. They complain about our royal family who cost those of us who pay taxes 70p a year. Whilst at the same time each of them take £70 in benefits a week. Give me a fucking break.
"The vast majority of Britons are happy with the royal family"
You haven't spoken to many "Britons" from Wales or Scotland I'll wager. By my estimation I would say only 12% give fuck. You claim those who dislike them must be dole scroungers!? Go back to your daily mail for solace you POS.
@SmiteTheUnholy I am Scottish you fucking imbecile. I am currently living in Scotland and my family has done so for well over 800 years. The vast majority of people Ive encountered who dislike the royal family are dole scroungers. That my friend is a fact. Wheras the better educated people are the less the complain about the royalty. Mind your own cesspool of a nation before you spread your American retardation to our fine shores. Daily mail? Fuckoff moron.
"...spread your American retardation to our fine shores."
I'm Welsh.
By your reasoning we must have a physics department largely populated by dole scroungers.
I'm certain that dislike or indifference to the royal family in Scotland is much greater than the 8% of the unemployed there.
You have a disdain for the unemployed whom you refer to as "scroungers" yet are sycophant towards the biggest "scroungers" of the lot i.e. the Royals.
@SmiteTheUnholy Get out the cellar yourself manchild. I have a dislike of scroungers. Something the royal family most certainly are not. They cost us £38 million,half of which is in building maintenance that we would pay no matter what. That lowers them to around £20million, income from royal estates paid INTO the treasury alone is well over 6x that. Lets not forget the massive boost to tourism and entertainment value aswell. Whilst physical, fucking a sheep does not make you a physicist,GTFO.
interesting that my front page had the letters in purple as if I had watched this previously and after making this comment once I don't see it showing up
My wife, who is from the Philippines, loves the British monarchy. Hell, I don't know why. But she got involved because of Princess Di. She's quite angry with Charles. Heaven knows why she's into this wedding. Oh, well.
Why wont you let me be a normal person. I swear to god I hate when these posh assholes want all the free swag that comes with their status and just dont want any of the less appealing side of it. Fuck you.
certainly most countries on the world do not ensure any child could become leader -- Obama went to the right schools and knew the right people. the monarchy is endorsed by many Britons and they live on their own money and their own lands. They aren't stealing anything or inappropriate, unless of course you are ignorant of history like this lad
They do more good than harm and when the shit hits the fan people listen to them, especially those that hate the government….even thought the royals are part of an agreement of government of England.
@mirandansa You dont ? do some reserche , get to the very bottom of who they are , what they are and what they have done and still do behind the scene and you will.
@mirandansa I hate them as long as they retain their power. I drove by the queens motorcade in Canada and I was thinking about how it would be nice if a missile hit her car.
This Englishman is a twat and has probably never read a history book. Without the monarchy and government working together England would have lived a few hundred more years in anarchy. As for being a republic…….wahahahah…..keep it!...If you really want to know why England has a monarchy then read or listen to “This Sceptred Isle” It starts in 55BC and even if you are English you will probably not have heard any of this history before.
We live in the 'modern' age and are supposedly democratic now. Civilization in Britain will not fall apart due to the absence of some long standing parasites who enjoy a status no higher than 'Lady GaGa' in most peoples minds.
@SmiteTheUnholy Why remove a part of English culture that does more good than harm and brings in more revenue than it costs. The monarchy is part of the English history and a heroic symbol to its people. England has had one big trouble since its birth, too many people wanted to be its king. This caused anarchy in Briton for over a thousand years, only when the people took control did they realise that England would be more stable with a king and a government...its complicate!
You don't think blood-lines run the US -- your the ignorant one. Even Freaking Cheney and Obama's blood line are attached -- how F'd up do you think that is.
FAntastic...I've been waiting for this....20%...try 40%!!! including Anglafiles....or those of us of Brit desent here in the states... This bloodline crap has GOT TO GO!!!
It's just another way to keep corruption going...and stiffle the will of the people...(and keep them slaves)...
I worship the royals because they are of the Merovingian bloodline, and descended from the ancient Annunaki. Plus, the royals are not bad looking, as far as reptilian overlords go.
What this clown neglects to mention is that a good proportion of the British public could not give a flying fuck about the royal wedding, and we'll be doing almost anything that day to get away from it. If they were televising Kate with her ass in the air that would be something else though.....!
@eastsider4eva Go worship your clown queen and don't forget to bow while you wipe her royal asshole. Nobody wants to hear your subhuman sympathizing sorriness on this channel.
@FatalAnimal you want to know why I glorify blood sacrifice? because humans are so stupid they dont even realize what is happening to them. they deserve it and you know I am right.
THERE IS NO FUCKING OBSESSION...NO ONE GIVES A FUCK....THIS IS ALL THE MSM GIVING AN ILLUSION THAT AMERICANS OR ANYONE, BUT THE MSM THEMSELVES ACTUALLY GIVE A FLYING.....ALL THEY WILL DO IS KILL THAT POOR DUMMY LIKE THEY DID DIANA...
oh shit, I know the english guy he goes around tv stations sprouting his bullshit lol he is so annoying..how is 20% the majority ?. There is nothing undemocratic about the Queen holding election for her subjects ???. the english guy is a nobody just jealous that his mum didnt love him
Also, I'd like to point out that Prince Charles served in the Falklands, and Price Harry fought in Afghanistan. How many politicians would let their kids actually serve?
He's basically just spouting lies. Everyone in the UK considers the monarch nothing more than a figure head, which she is. She doesn't lead the country in any meaningful sense, in fact in no sense at all.
im no fan of the royal family.....they are playing their part in the ultimate creation of the new world order......it is taking shape and they are a large part of it.....the sad thing is that by the time people wake up to it we will have all been enslaved......
@jetli80 The Royal family attract millions more in tourism revenue than they cost, and they're also part of the heritage. It's really no different than using taxpayer money to keep a museum open, except we actually see a decent monetary return.
@jetli80 The queen is one of the most powerful people on earth if not the most powerful. She still owns half of canada, Australia, New Zealand, a lot of islands in the atlantic, etc.... she has the last say on a lot of things on earth...
@mmaghfai No, she doesn't. The Queen has no power whatsoever over Canada, Australia, New Zealand or any of the islands around the world. They all have elected heads of state. The Queen is a figurehead; she has no authority whatsoever.
@mw2000 she can desolve parliament and cause election if she feels its in the national interest.She also has has lots of friends at the Bohemian Grove
@mw2000 what a load of tosh. The elected australian government was dismissed in 1975, despite two years left of its mandate. The Governor general very much his royal priviledge to force Gough whitlam's government out. The fact that australia and NZ forces ( and canada) are fightingin Iraq and Afghanistan is a direct result of the queen being the head of the armed forces in these countries..
@1adadada No. The events in Aus were the actions of the Gov-General, not the Queen, who admitted to being powerless to stop events unfolding.
As for Aus/NZ/Canada fighting in Afghanistan because the Queen is head of the armed forced, are you insane? The Queen cannot command troops into battle. Canada was not in Iraq. Jamaica and Grenada didn't get involved in either. Why not? If the Queen can command someone to go to war, why not them? The Queen cannot even decide if Britain goes to war.
@mw2000 " not the Queen, who admitted to being powerless to stop events unfolding." This is argumentum ad ignoranium and is not supported by anything other than the queen said it was so. This premise relies on us taking her at her word, which I do not. I will ignore the ad hominem and respond to the fallacy statement. yes the queen can/does command troops into battle/ deploy troops overseas. Canada fought in Iraq 1
@mw2000. This is not really a credible argument. Jamaica and Grenada don't really have a significant or long history of militarism as far as I know, where as the Gurkas ( who are represented in the middle east along with Aus,NZ etc ) do.
@1adadada Why isn't it a credible argument? They have a military, why wouldn't they be sent there? They are - by your logic of the Queen controlling everything - far more expendable than Aus or Canada.
The Gurkhas are a brigade of the British army, so they do what the British military tells them to. They are not another nation of people commanded to go into battle by the Queen. If they don't want to be a Gurkha, they don't have to be, they can continue to be Nepalese citizens.
@mw2000 you've lost me. I made no reference to expendability or controll. I merely stated as the head of the armed forces, the queen has the power to order foreign troops overseas. This is not conjecture this is fact. Your reference to expendability, is there fore irrelevant, and a non-seqitur. I think it would be wise for you to review the queens powers for yourself, before we continue this discussion.
@unknownshadow1993 Your the idiot. Charles, William's Father, The Queens SON will be King when it dies .....and as long as we keep paying £40m a year in maintenance of course...
@DJCW You call me an idiot even though you don't know the difference between "your" and "you're". "It dies"? Charles does not take the crown automatically! He can choose to pass it straight on!
@unknownshadow1993 Pffft!! er yeah thank you MISS for the English lesson, now time for a short English History lesson Sherlock. Charles WILL be King If (IT) dies NOT William!! If Charles ABDICATES then William is NEXT in line....end of story and your retarded rant!!!
I mean IT as in that old bitch lizard Queen. Fuck her and her Zionist Cohorts!!!
hmmmm? "He can choose to pass it straight on! " Now you change your story because YOU WERE WRONG!!
The Royal family are inbred scumbag bottom feeders. Even if you hate Alex Jones you should watch this video The Royal Wedding exposed! /watch?v=-I3l7wYmUyU
They are INBRED Germanic (not even British) I support this British Republican (big difference from the republicans over here) they want INDEPENDENCE from those UGLY shills known as Royalty
Not sure why Americans are gushing over the royal fucked up wedding or the family, didn't you guys have a revolution to get rid of them from your country ...
100% of royal bullshit spewed by the RATigan. americans hate them. i know i do. not hate.......yes hate. they are murdering innocents and using our military to do it but the media has the people thinking they are freedom fighters.
sssssjjjj1 3 weeks ago
Eurotrash has never meet a dictator they didnt like
DaytonaRoadster 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Who do all of you consider to be inbred in the British Royal Family?
bette1908 5 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I have never disagreed with anyone more.
He thinks he is so clever. He Isn't, and is grossly out of touch with mainstream opinion
scottp2210 9 months ago
Hari is right on. Britain is a democracy with a prime minister and elected representatives and does not need to hang on to the Queen and the monarchy. The Queen has no powers and is a waste of British taxpayers money! Get rid of the monarchy and those Islamofascists!
hatmap 9 months ago 4
@hatmap You traitor!
TheLiberalKnight 4 months ago
@Redpilldown
You need to indicate where I've said something ahistorical and how it negates my argument.
Your comment about legoland reveals that you miss the crux of the argument used by the chap in the video i.e. being a tourist attraction does not warrant being a head of state.
SmiteTheUnholy 9 months ago 2
@Redpilldown
What we need is another Cromwell.
Does legoland have a lego Queen?
SmiteTheUnholy 9 months ago
I despise everything about the royal wedding, especially the timing of it which is designed to distract from the abuses of the middle and working classes that are going on right now...on the other hand it brings in a ton of revenue to the country which dwarfs the twenty million quids of tax payers' money. Damned royals and their money-making ways.
geffel 10 months ago
We NEED more people like you here in Britain we are living the Royal Popularity with "Big Brother" wedding.
Myapplexpress 10 months ago
@Ant
The demand for and attendance to the street parties to celebrate this upcoming wedding can be used as a crude measure to gauge their popularity. This tentatively suggests that they are least popular in Glasgow which is the most populous city in Scotland.
I know you are tempted to take this as evidence for your hypothesis about the unemployed since Glasgow has a high unemployment of ~11% however the remainder of the population should create sufficient demand for street parties nonetheless.
SmiteTheUnholy 10 months ago
@Ant
An obscure reference to some poll without actually giving a link to it does not count as empirical evidence. Which poll? Who took the poll? How large was the sample? How was the data collected? Does the sample represent the full spectrum of British society?...
The Royals are so popular in Scotland that they're having the fewest street parties and none at all in Glasgow due lack of interest.
You loyalty is commendable especially after Prince Philip referred to your country men as drunks.
SmiteTheUnholy 10 months ago
@Mite What does a street party have to do with the monarchys relevance? I dont remember the last time anyone hosted an NHS street party yet im pretty sure the majority of people wish to preserve it. If you are so concerned with the polling perhaps you should look into them or maybe you could ask mummy to spoon feed it to you. Good luck.
Antarayan 10 months ago
Profitable parasites that would be more profitable still after being humanely stuffed by a taxidermist and put on display as it would lower maintenance costs, just the odd dusting now and then is all that is required.
You can still sell the brand e.g. pencils, T-shirts and mugs to the other mugs willing to buy them. The tourists will still come to see the trappings of royalty stuffed or otherwise.
Alternatively we could auction them to the tourists so they can take them home as souvenirs
SmiteTheUnholy 10 months ago 2
boy, I'm glad we revolted
ieodksnw787 10 months ago
the queen as a symbol of democracy is a joke. her enumerated royal powers are expressly that of a dictator.
the fact that these quasi-dictatorial powers are exercised only nominally today does not preclude a future "king" or "queen" from choosing to wield the full dictatorial breadth of those powers.
ieodksnw787 10 months ago
@ieodksnw787
They really don't have any power.
geffel 10 months ago
I don't think Barack Obama, or any other President was ever on food stamps. And a lot came from poor backgrounds like Clinton and Nixon.
ieodksnw787 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"How about we research your geneology and see all of the people your ancestors fucked over and force you to repay the debts."
How about we research yours? You claim to have a family history spanning 800 yrs in Scotland. And that you "currently" live there. Conspicuously you did not mention that were actually Scottish (i.e. born there). In fact you sound more like an intolerable Yank trying to 'discover' his Scottish roots.
SmiteTheUnholy 10 months ago
@SmiteTheUnholy Did I not mention that I was Scottish? Really? Not even in the exact comment your quoting the 800 years comment from? Perhaps you are correct, I forgot that your genetics consist mostly of sheep DNA,they dont have laws regarding crime do they? Mentally inadequate failure is failing.
Antarayan 10 months ago
You mean assumptions like those who dislike the monarchy are mostly unemployed "dole scroungers"?
No I can honestly say we have known rapists or interbreeding in our family. Is that a common thing in your circles then?
Your comparison is fucked in any case as these parasites still reap the profits of their ancestor's peccadilloes and demand respect for them to boot. And shit like you are only too willing to provide it.
SmiteTheUnholy 10 months ago
@SmiteTheUnholy You lost sweetie. Learn to read.
Antarayan 10 months ago
Don't confuse indifference with consent.
"Every piece of land on this Earth are ill-gotten gains"
I whole heartedly agree but that is another subject for a different time. But my point is that such people are not worthy of the respect that servile scum such as yourself lavish upon them.
SmiteTheUnholy 10 months ago
@SmiteTheUnholy Do you honestly believe your family is pure and angel like? Nobody in your family has stolen,raped or murdered? Delusional much? The fact of the matter is that times change,the only difference between the royals and your family is that they were far more succesfull. Whats your point? Youre just a bitter little man that wants what they have. How about we research your geneology and see all of the people your ancestors fucked over and force you to repay the debts.
Antarayan 10 months ago
What does "agree" with the monarchy mean?
Whether the monarchy is profitable or not is irrelevant since I primarily took issue with your ignorant comment about the unemployed. You are shifting the goal posts yourself dipshit.
Of what the fuck is William going to become the Duke of after this marriage? all the other positions are are taken. Duke of Ben Evis by any chance?
Provide some empirical evidence Haggis head.
SmiteTheUnholy 10 months ago
@SmiteTheUnholy The majority of Brits agree with having the monarchy and feel that it is still relevant. Looking back I should have said "in my experience" in regard to the opponents Ive met . These however are FACTS. Yet you respond with assumptions and petty comments about newspapers. I couldnt give a flying fuck about any royal title or activity so long as its profitable and doesnt cause undue suffering. You moved the goalposts,you inserted the bullshit and you failed miserably. GTFO.
Antarayan 10 months ago
"...your intellectual inadequacy"
Says the kid who erroneously concludes that most of Britain love the royals because his circle of friends do and makes 'Daily Mail-esque' claims that those who don't must be unemployed due to his confirmation bias.
Heaven forbid that you should ever be unemployed yourself or would you leach from mater and pater instead of the taxpayer?
"owners of the land are not entitled to any of the benefits?"
That land is ill-gotten gains.
Run along now tartan twat.
SmiteTheUnholy 10 months ago
@SmiteTheUnholy Every piece of land on this Earth are ill-gotten gains you moronic waste of oxygen. Yes,your intellectual inadequacy. Its the reason you are feebly attempting to change the subject to benefits and ignoring the fact that the monarchy is profitable. The reason you remove the @ in the hope im not going to see your feeble minded response. I never said people who disagree with royalty are unemployed. This furthers your apparent mental inadequacy. Less sheep fucking more reading please
Antarayan 10 months ago
@SmiteTheUnholy The majority of Brits agree with the monarchy. Almost every poll and personal experience confirm that belief. Nothing you say has any basis whatsoever,your only retorts are either inaccurate or mentions of right wing newspapers. You really need to do better than this son,its pathetic.
Antarayan 10 months ago
@Antarayan
"...tourism and entertainment value "
So does a fucking waxwork.
"...income from royal estates paid INTO the treasury"
They don't earn money. They inherited vast estates from their ancestors who took them. Those estates could raise even more money without those parasites leeching from it to the tune of tens of millions. They are as redundant as the Pope's penis.
If you think having a thistle up your arse makes you representative of the majority then you need think again.
SmiteTheUnholy 10 months ago
@SmiteTheUnholy So the owners of the land are not entitled to any of the benefits? Take your communist bullshit back to Russia. Your house could serve me much better if your parasitic arse didnt live in it. Why dont I just take it from you? I never said I was representative of the majority,im simply pointing out your intellectual inadequacy.
Antarayan 10 months ago
Fuck England and Israel
zimm1986 10 months ago
I am german,we are so happy that they ( the sachsen coburgs ) left for england and that we dont have to pay for them,I heard the wedding cost 48 000 000Euro
alpenhuhn1 10 months ago
Fuck the Queen. The Royals are all part of the NWO plot.
Nadanbata 10 months ago
Did he say henry the 8th? Did he die in 1547? And isn't the monarchy just figure head now? I thought parliment had the power?
TheSlaveKeyboardist 10 months ago
finally a brit with some sense. Also the only Americans obsessed with this royal BS is the American media that is trying to force this crap down our throats. What a shame
Drknoble 10 months ago 9
@eastsider4eva But I find inbreeding utterly disgusting (it happens among all royalty not just Brits) it is the the stupid, but it seems more as if YOU were the one trying to shut down the debate right away. Claiming my points are null and void, while these usurping leeches still tax half the western world & have servants wiping their asses for them. I don't stand for ANYTHING remember that next time you feel like being a dumb troll then maybe there could be a debate.
MadXMax187 10 months ago
@eastsider4eva Alex Jones isn't my cult leader, matter of fact I don't even subscribe to his youtube channels because he hates on people that I look up to. I'm not sure that he hates German people, I certainly have no problem with the German people AT ALL. All I was really trying to say was that British royalty are inbred and not really Anglo-Saxon but Germanic (not that it matters & no this is not a conspiracy) I personally think the Germans are a great people with an amazing country & culture.
MadXMax187 10 months ago
i'd rather have Britian's "royalty" and multiple candidates for actual leadership than the US's 2 party stranglehold of dictatorship of power. Their "kings and queens' don't really have political power--they're more like pop stars.
hanslute 10 months ago
Monarchy is so overrated and stupid but I think all the radical Muslims pouring into the country might be a bigger threat to England than the Royal Family is.
GunOwnerDan 10 months ago
Should have never gave up your guns.
dmvallaccess 10 months ago
Off with 'er heads.
efectomariposa93 10 months ago
These Illuminati royals are a bunch of clown shoe wearing, devil worshiping, child molesting scumbags.
Down with the Illuminati
A message to the Illuminati:
You will fail at you're goals.
Why? You ask well I'll tell you why.
It's because you Illuminati suck at life.
narukofan2 10 months ago
@narukofan2 Thats right,They are all that and a bag of chips
111Yamato 10 months ago
@111Yamato LOL. They sure are.
narukofan2 10 months ago
This manhild has no clue as to what he is talking about. The vast majority of Britons are happy with the royal family and the vast majority of people who complain about them are brats on welfare who are barely literate. They complain about our royal family who cost those of us who pay taxes 70p a year. Whilst at the same time each of them take £70 in benefits a week. Give me a fucking break.
Antarayan 10 months ago
@Antarayan
Your monarchy tried to raid heating funds for the elderly, May they rot in hell and those opposed to them have my support.
It's why we tossed your inbred ass's out.
BadSwineDOTcom 10 months ago
@BadSwineDOTcom Nobody "tossed" us out. My familys lived here for over 800 years. YOU are our national refuse, not the other way around moron.
Antarayan 10 months ago
@Antarayan
Go fuck your cousin, floss your nasty teeth and send your income to a millionaire you inbred giblet.
1776 = PWNED.
BadSwineDOTcom 10 months ago
@BadSwineDOTcom That is exactly why you are our national refuse. Its nice to see you keep the stereotypical American retardation alive.
Antarayan 10 months ago
@Antarayan
"The vast majority of Britons are happy with the royal family"
You haven't spoken to many "Britons" from Wales or Scotland I'll wager. By my estimation I would say only 12% give fuck. You claim those who dislike them must be dole scroungers!? Go back to your daily mail for solace you POS.
SmiteTheUnholy 10 months ago
@SmiteTheUnholy I am Scottish you fucking imbecile. I am currently living in Scotland and my family has done so for well over 800 years. The vast majority of people Ive encountered who dislike the royal family are dole scroungers. That my friend is a fact. Wheras the better educated people are the less the complain about the royalty. Mind your own cesspool of a nation before you spread your American retardation to our fine shores. Daily mail? Fuckoff moron.
Antarayan 10 months ago
@Antarayan
Stand back! He's Scottish! and he loves our Queen.
SmiteTheUnholy 10 months ago
@Antarayan
"...spread your American retardation to our fine shores."
I'm Welsh.
By your reasoning we must have a physics department largely populated by dole scroungers.
I'm certain that dislike or indifference to the royal family in Scotland is much greater than the 8% of the unemployed there.
You have a disdain for the unemployed whom you refer to as "scroungers" yet are sycophant towards the biggest "scroungers" of the lot i.e. the Royals.
Get out from your Mother's cellar and git kid.
SmiteTheUnholy 10 months ago
@SmiteTheUnholy Get out the cellar yourself manchild. I have a dislike of scroungers. Something the royal family most certainly are not. They cost us £38 million,half of which is in building maintenance that we would pay no matter what. That lowers them to around £20million, income from royal estates paid INTO the treasury alone is well over 6x that. Lets not forget the massive boost to tourism and entertainment value aswell. Whilst physical, fucking a sheep does not make you a physicist,GTFO.
Antarayan 10 months ago
I Will not watch this mess.
jmjfanss 10 months ago 2
Freaks and elitist pigs
Born2Flesh 10 months ago 2
@MoxNewsDotCom Do you know what this guys name is?
Redpilldown 10 months ago
interesting that my front page had the letters in purple as if I had watched this previously and after making this comment once I don't see it showing up
gwizzle1 10 months ago
My wife, who is from the Philippines, loves the British monarchy. Hell, I don't know why. But she got involved because of Princess Di. She's quite angry with Charles. Heaven knows why she's into this wedding. Oh, well.
ButterflyStorms 10 months ago
interesting that my front page had the letters in purple like I had watched this previously
gwizzle1 10 months ago
Eat The Priest Class...
DackIsBack 10 months ago
This guy is right on the money. These royalties are as evil as the banksters that we hate and want to get rid of.
JuggalocodeChile1988 10 months ago
@JuggalocodeChile1988 why are they, the goverment gives them no cash?
Redpilldown 10 months ago
@JuggalocodeChile1988 They're up there but no one is as bad as those banksters. They're even less useful than the royals. Thieves; all of them.
ButterflyStorms 10 months ago
rubber gloves for you on your return looooooool
MorpheusWasRight 10 months ago
Why wont you let me be a normal person. I swear to god I hate when these posh assholes want all the free swag that comes with their status and just dont want any of the less appealing side of it. Fuck you.
Churchx77 10 months ago
all children are prisoners of the world into which they are born
cruiscinlan 10 months ago
20:24 BACKWARD! If I ever see you in Briton you little Yankee fucking sell-out wanabe newsboy I will punch you right in the face.
Redpilldown 10 months ago
certainly most countries on the world do not ensure any child could become leader -- Obama went to the right schools and knew the right people. the monarchy is endorsed by many Britons and they live on their own money and their own lands. They aren't stealing anything or inappropriate, unless of course you are ignorant of history like this lad
cruiscinlan 10 months ago
This is fucking retarded, they seriously need to have every last cent of theirs stripped away.
DvineGaming 10 months ago
only 20% that is surprising
LionCome 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fuck the royal family. They are useless now.
GTR66960 10 months ago
They do more good than harm and when the shit hits the fan people listen to them, especially those that hate the government….even thought the royals are part of an agreement of government of England.
Redpilldown 10 months ago
Holy shit! A US news story that's about another country!
redcomic619 10 months ago
I don't hate the royals personally. But I think the monarchy as a system should be ditched.
mirandansa 10 months ago
@mirandansa You dont ? do some reserche , get to the very bottom of who they are , what they are and what they have done and still do behind the scene and you will.
luc649 10 months ago
@mirandansa I hate them as long as they retain their power. I drove by the queens motorcade in Canada and I was thinking about how it would be nice if a missile hit her car.
DvineGaming 10 months ago
This Englishman is a twat and has probably never read a history book. Without the monarchy and government working together England would have lived a few hundred more years in anarchy. As for being a republic…….wahahahah…..keep it!...If you really want to know why England has a monarchy then read or listen to “This Sceptred Isle” It starts in 55BC and even if you are English you will probably not have heard any of this history before.
Redpilldown 10 months ago
@Redpilldown
We live in the 'modern' age and are supposedly democratic now. Civilization in Britain will not fall apart due to the absence of some long standing parasites who enjoy a status no higher than 'Lady GaGa' in most peoples minds.
SmiteTheUnholy 10 months ago 16
@SmiteTheUnholy Why remove a part of English culture that does more good than harm and brings in more revenue than it costs. The monarchy is part of the English history and a heroic symbol to its people. England has had one big trouble since its birth, too many people wanted to be its king. This caused anarchy in Briton for over a thousand years, only when the people took control did they realise that England would be more stable with a king and a government...its complicate!
Redpilldown 10 months ago
@SmiteTheUnholy .............know your history tit.........and legoland is dead to all in uk
Redpilldown 9 months ago
That what u get with all that inbreeding
kimlea69 10 months ago
I love this Brit!
MTL911Truth 10 months ago
You don't think blood-lines run the US -- your the ignorant one. Even Freaking Cheney and Obama's blood line are attached -- how F'd up do you think that is.
prayfortruejustice 10 months ago
ain't gonna happen buddy.
MrAvalanche2004 10 months ago
Yep... nothing like a good old fashioned royal wedding to bring a nation together.
MrAvalanche2004 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
OFF WITH THEIR HEADS.
mattjay1 10 months ago
FAntastic...I've been waiting for this....20%...try 40%!!! including Anglafiles....or those of us of Brit desent here in the states... This bloodline crap has GOT TO GO!!!
It's just another way to keep corruption going...and stiffle the will of the people...(and keep them slaves)...
marypoppins2009 10 months ago
inbred tyrants...thats all they are...KILL ALL MONARCHS!!!!
Steadno 10 months ago 2
@Steadno I'm anti-monarchy but, you call them tyrants and then exclaim we should kill them all...
AyeYirMa 10 months ago
@AyeYirMa well yes...and?
Steadno 10 months ago
Ooops.. He spoke out.
He'll have a "accident" soon.
hitech98 10 months ago
Fuck these royal pricks. I feel sorry for the guy who has to bottle the queens shit. Fucked up people!!!
fukkuutube 10 months ago
I worship the royals because they are of the Merovingian bloodline, and descended from the ancient Annunaki. Plus, the royals are not bad looking, as far as reptilian overlords go.
mackler 10 months ago
What this clown neglects to mention is that a good proportion of the British public could not give a flying fuck about the royal wedding, and we'll be doing almost anything that day to get away from it. If they were televising Kate with her ass in the air that would be something else though.....!
Cabronosidad 10 months ago
@eastsider4eva Go worship your clown queen and don't forget to bow while you wipe her royal asshole. Nobody wants to hear your subhuman sympathizing sorriness on this channel.
MadXMax187 10 months ago
@eastsider4eva We don't want to hear your COINCIDENCE CULT CRAP HERE. Go fuck yourself little boy
MadXMax187 10 months ago
BABYLONIAN SUN WORSHIP. GIVE US YOUR CHILDREN SLAVES!!!!
InCMPunkWeTrust 10 months ago
Four words. German inbred psychopath satanists.
Kitswain59 10 months ago 41
@Kitswain59 they arent German bruh. they are Babylonians
InCMPunkWeTrust 10 months ago
@Kitswain59 so true
toetag88 10 months ago
The French, had the right idea on how to treat their "royals"...
grendelcatt 10 months ago 2
@grendelcatt why do compassionate liberals glorify bloody revolutions?
InCMPunkWeTrust 10 months ago
@InCMPunkWeTrust Not sure - why do compassionate Conservatives Glorify Blood Sacrifices?
FatalAnimal 10 months ago
@FatalAnimal I'm no conservative.
InCMPunkWeTrust 10 months ago
@FatalAnimal you want to know why I glorify blood sacrifice? because humans are so stupid they dont even realize what is happening to them. they deserve it and you know I am right.
InCMPunkWeTrust 10 months ago
THERE IS NO FUCKING OBSESSION...NO ONE GIVES A FUCK....THIS IS ALL THE MSM GIVING AN ILLUSION THAT AMERICANS OR ANYONE, BUT THE MSM THEMSELVES ACTUALLY GIVE A FLYING.....ALL THEY WILL DO IS KILL THAT POOR DUMMY LIKE THEY DID DIANA...
DeathDOer01 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
oh shit, I know the english guy he goes around tv stations sprouting his bullshit lol he is so annoying..how is 20% the majority ?. There is nothing undemocratic about the Queen holding election for her subjects ???. the english guy is a nobody just jealous that his mum didnt love him
harj2009 10 months ago
Comment removed
harj2009 10 months ago
Also, I'd like to point out that Prince Charles served in the Falklands, and Price Harry fought in Afghanistan. How many politicians would let their kids actually serve?
01000001011100100111 10 months ago
He's basically just spouting lies. Everyone in the UK considers the monarch nothing more than a figure head, which she is. She doesn't lead the country in any meaningful sense, in fact in no sense at all.
01000001011100100111 10 months ago
im no fan of the royal family.....they are playing their part in the ultimate creation of the new world order......it is taking shape and they are a large part of it.....the sad thing is that by the time people wake up to it we will have all been enslaved......
lumpfish99 10 months ago
they are stupid inbreeds you kick them too the street they will starve
f328owner 10 months ago
but he has a point, the british are funneling money to an institution that holds no power and does nothing for the state.
jetli80 10 months ago
@jetli80 The Royal family attract millions more in tourism revenue than they cost, and they're also part of the heritage. It's really no different than using taxpayer money to keep a museum open, except we actually see a decent monetary return.
01000001011100100111 10 months ago
@jetli80 he is 100% accurate....there are govt trolls everywhere......they put out comments to make people pro-royal......
lumpfish99 10 months ago
@jetli80 The queen is one of the most powerful people on earth if not the most powerful. She still owns half of canada, Australia, New Zealand, a lot of islands in the atlantic, etc.... she has the last say on a lot of things on earth...
mmaghfai 10 months ago
@mmaghfai No, she doesn't. The Queen has no power whatsoever over Canada, Australia, New Zealand or any of the islands around the world. They all have elected heads of state. The Queen is a figurehead; she has no authority whatsoever.
mw2000 10 months ago
@mw2000 she can desolve parliament and cause election if she feels its in the national interest.She also has has lots of friends at the Bohemian Grove
harj2009 10 months ago
@mw2000 what a load of tosh. The elected australian government was dismissed in 1975, despite two years left of its mandate. The Governor general very much his royal priviledge to force Gough whitlam's government out. The fact that australia and NZ forces ( and canada) are fightingin Iraq and Afghanistan is a direct result of the queen being the head of the armed forces in these countries..
1adadada 10 months ago
@1adadada No. The events in Aus were the actions of the Gov-General, not the Queen, who admitted to being powerless to stop events unfolding.
As for Aus/NZ/Canada fighting in Afghanistan because the Queen is head of the armed forced, are you insane? The Queen cannot command troops into battle. Canada was not in Iraq. Jamaica and Grenada didn't get involved in either. Why not? If the Queen can command someone to go to war, why not them? The Queen cannot even decide if Britain goes to war.
mw2000 10 months ago
@mw2000 " not the Queen, who admitted to being powerless to stop events unfolding." This is argumentum ad ignoranium and is not supported by anything other than the queen said it was so. This premise relies on us taking her at her word, which I do not. I will ignore the ad hominem and respond to the fallacy statement. yes the queen can/does command troops into battle/ deploy troops overseas. Canada fought in Iraq 1
1adadada 10 months ago
@mw2000. This is not really a credible argument. Jamaica and Grenada don't really have a significant or long history of militarism as far as I know, where as the Gurkas ( who are represented in the middle east along with Aus,NZ etc ) do.
1adadada 10 months ago
@1adadada Why isn't it a credible argument? They have a military, why wouldn't they be sent there? They are - by your logic of the Queen controlling everything - far more expendable than Aus or Canada.
The Gurkhas are a brigade of the British army, so they do what the British military tells them to. They are not another nation of people commanded to go into battle by the Queen. If they don't want to be a Gurkha, they don't have to be, they can continue to be Nepalese citizens.
mw2000 10 months ago
@mw2000 you've lost me. I made no reference to expendability or controll. I merely stated as the head of the armed forces, the queen has the power to order foreign troops overseas. This is not conjecture this is fact. Your reference to expendability, is there fore irrelevant, and a non-seqitur. I think it would be wise for you to review the queens powers for yourself, before we continue this discussion.
1adadada 10 months ago
@mw2000 I concede the point about the Gurkhas.
1adadada 10 months ago
@mmaghfai gee i thought the world went to war to get rid of these kind of imperialistic states so why are the british still supporting them?
jetli80 10 months ago
This guy is an idiot! William is going to become King, not his father.
unknownshadow1993 10 months ago
@unknownshadow1993 Your the idiot. Charles, William's Father, The Queens SON will be King when it dies .....and as long as we keep paying £40m a year in maintenance of course...
Blood sucking parasites!!
DJCW 10 months ago
@DJCW You call me an idiot even though you don't know the difference between "your" and "you're". "It dies"? Charles does not take the crown automatically! He can choose to pass it straight on!
unknownshadow1993 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@unknownshadow1993 Pffft!! er yeah thank you MISS for the English lesson, now time for a short English History lesson Sherlock. Charles WILL be King If (IT) dies NOT William!! If Charles ABDICATES then William is NEXT in line....end of story and your retarded rant!!!
I mean IT as in that old bitch lizard Queen. Fuck her and her Zionist Cohorts!!!
hmmmm? "He can choose to pass it straight on! " Now you change your story because YOU WERE WRONG!!
DJCW 10 months ago
Fuck you we have a prime minister! Please don't listen to this cunt!!!!
unknownshadow1993 10 months ago
@unknownshadow1993 this 'cunt' comes across as intelligent. What good is a prime minister if he can be vetoed by the monarchy?
TheJourney000 10 months ago
@TheJourney000 If any monarch actually did that their feet wouldn't touch the ground. We'd be a republic in a week.
01000001011100100111 10 months ago
@TheJourney000 Seeing as the prime minister does not usually get vetoed by the Monarchy, then very!
unknownshadow1993 10 months ago
Off with his head !
silentfades 10 months ago
He's jealous because he's not banging kate.
lenfantterribleX 10 months ago
The Royal family are inbred scumbag bottom feeders. Even if you hate Alex Jones you should watch this video The Royal Wedding exposed! /watch?v=-I3l7wYmUyU
They are INBRED Germanic (not even British) I support this British Republican (big difference from the republicans over here) they want INDEPENDENCE from those UGLY shills known as Royalty
MadXMax187 10 months ago
God Save the Royal Demons
mispistoleros 10 months ago
i know i wont be watching
GONECRUISING72 10 months ago 23
@GONECRUISING72 yep, me neither
punkgirlinLT 10 months ago
Time for Regicide.
kjb86 10 months ago
Hey British Anarchists do the right thing!
starkweather444 10 months ago 2
but...kate middleton is hot...
oJKBo 10 months ago
The British royal wedding is truly disgusting!
European royals = inbreds with IQ around room temperature
KimInLosAngeles 10 months ago 3
Not sure why Americans are gushing over the royal fucked up wedding or the family, didn't you guys have a revolution to get rid of them from your country ...
TheAsfaloth 10 months ago 3
That is the best interview ever!! I couldnt agree more.
nett103 10 months ago 2