Ahmadi issue was handled awkwardly by so called ulema. They created enmity among brothers. They were supposed to honor their viewpoint. Hence new sect. Sects following is SHIRK as per:
"Turn towards Him and be dutiful to Him; be firm in devotion, and do not become MUSHRIKEEN who created rifts in their order and are divided into sects, with each group exulting in what it has". 30:31-32
If Quran was followed we will not be divided as sunnis, shias, wahabi,barelvi etc leaving alone Ahmadis.
"Dr Abdul Hakim in his pamphlet Masih al-Dajjal and other writings accuses me of having written that anyone who does not believe in me, even if he has not heard my name or is living in a country beyond the reach of my call, is an unbeliever and shall go to hell. This is a patent fabrication by the Doctor. I have never said so in any book or poster of mine. It is binding on him to produce such writings of mine in which I have said so." [Haqeeqat-ul-Wahi], p. 178
The link Ghamidi Sahib established between Ahmadiyyat and Sufism is quite amusing......perhaps he needs some excuse not to accept Ahmadiyyat the true Islam.
Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (AS) Was Imam Mahdi, Masih Maud & True prophet of Allah. And Hazur(SAW) predicted about his coming, It was very clear. It is must for Muslims/non-Muslims to accept him or they will be answerable to Allah.
Thanks for the post mortem Mr Ghamidi. You have done a great service in explaining the back ground and how sufism influenced these episodes. Strange thing is Bahai and Rashad Khalifa and Mirza all swear to be messengers of Allah but their core messages don't match with each other!!!
It seems that Ghamdi sb himself has not properly studied the work of Maulana Abul Hassan Ali Nadvi praised by him because Maulana's approach is quite opposite. Ghamdi sb's approach is that Mirza was a careless sufi who made public the sectets of Sufia. Had Maulana been alive today, he would have been amused by this approach. I cannot believe that Ghamdi sb can be that superficial, perhaps Ahmadiat is not his topic.
Ahmadi issue was handled awkwardly by so called ulema. They created enmity among brothers. They were supposed to honor their viewpoint. Hence new sect. Sects following is SHIRK as per:
"Turn towards Him and be dutiful to Him; be firm in devotion, and do not become MUSHRIKEEN who created rifts in their order and are divided into sects, with each group exulting in what it has". 30:31-32
If Quran was followed we will not be divided as sunnis, shias, wahabi,barelvi etc leaving alone Ahmadis.
reasonlight 4 months ago
"Dr Abdul Hakim in his pamphlet Masih al-Dajjal and other writings accuses me of having written that anyone who does not believe in me, even if he has not heard my name or is living in a country beyond the reach of my call, is an unbeliever and shall go to hell. This is a patent fabrication by the Doctor. I have never said so in any book or poster of mine. It is binding on him to produce such writings of mine in which I have said so." [Haqeeqat-ul-Wahi], p. 178
Mirza sb never talked of hell.
16maryam127 6 months ago
Great Analysis. Ghamdi Sahab the great.
fahadabid 6 months ago
The link Ghamidi Sahib established between Ahmadiyyat and Sufism is quite amusing......perhaps he needs some excuse not to accept Ahmadiyyat the true Islam.
TheDawahChannel 8 months ago
Please see this video response: " Reply to Ghamidi on Ahmadiyya Prophethood Claim Part-3 "
KhadimeAhmadiyyat 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (AS) Was Imam Mahdi, Masih Maud & True prophet of Allah. And Hazur(SAW) predicted about his coming, It was very clear. It is must for Muslims/non-Muslims to accept him or they will be answerable to Allah.
ahmerton1 11 months ago
very informative lecture
angularkid 11 months ago
Thanks for the post mortem Mr Ghamidi. You have done a great service in explaining the back ground and how sufism influenced these episodes. Strange thing is Bahai and Rashad Khalifa and Mirza all swear to be messengers of Allah but their core messages don't match with each other!!!
mubashir56 1 year ago
It seems that Ghamdi sb himself has not properly studied the work of Maulana Abul Hassan Ali Nadvi praised by him because Maulana's approach is quite opposite. Ghamdi sb's approach is that Mirza was a careless sufi who made public the sectets of Sufia. Had Maulana been alive today, he would have been amused by this approach. I cannot believe that Ghamdi sb can be that superficial, perhaps Ahmadiat is not his topic.
arshadsirajuddin 1 year ago