@ParapaDrifter You can't just throw together an SEG. It takes precision manufacturing and industrial equipment for the magnetization process. It takes a lot of energy required to magnetize the materials. The work to modulate all the equipment costs labor too.
You need 36 kilograms of raw unmagnetized neodymium, 36kg of teflon, 36kg of ferrite magnet, and 36 kg of copper. That's the weight after you shave the solid materials to size.
@TheRealVerbz I'm only looking for a cheap quick way to demonstrate the effect thats all, kindof like a backyard version of his one ring mockup; maybe put more rings in. It wouldn't be a full blown SEG. I guess what sparked this vein of thinking is the fact that Searl made more than what 5 or 10 back in 60s 70s?
It'd go a long way to impress more people if a smaller, less expensive version was made.
@ParapaDrifter The smallest model to demonstrate the Searl Effect is ann 18 inch diameter ring.
There is no cheap or easy way to make an SEG.
If we wanted to mass produce the devices, $25 million would be just enough for the facility, industrial equipment, workers, labor, licensing, legal, shipping, materials in bulk, etc.
If we wanted to demonstrate the magnetic sine wave effect where the roller doesn't need anything to keep orbiting, we need about $500,000 for the rest of the equipment.
Searl worked for British Rewine Electric Company when he first made his machines. He had an entire infrastructure backing him with all the equipment necessary, all the workers, all the materials for free.
All he paid for back then was the raw neodymium at 39 pents a kilo.
When he left the Electric Company, a very rich man named George Hains funded him. When George died, 13 elderly men backed John Searl and gave him the necessary money to keep working on the project.
slurry mix? He should have done some cheaply quick and dirty.
ParapaDrifter 10 months ago
@ParapaDrifter You can't just throw together an SEG. It takes precision manufacturing and industrial equipment for the magnetization process. It takes a lot of energy required to magnetize the materials. The work to modulate all the equipment costs labor too.
You need 36 kilograms of raw unmagnetized neodymium, 36kg of teflon, 36kg of ferrite magnet, and 36 kg of copper. That's the weight after you shave the solid materials to size.
This isn't standard technology.
TheRealVerbz 10 months ago
@TheRealVerbz I'm only looking for a cheap quick way to demonstrate the effect thats all, kindof like a backyard version of his one ring mockup; maybe put more rings in. It wouldn't be a full blown SEG. I guess what sparked this vein of thinking is the fact that Searl made more than what 5 or 10 back in 60s 70s?
It'd go a long way to impress more people if a smaller, less expensive version was made.
ParapaDrifter 10 months ago
@ParapaDrifter The smallest model to demonstrate the Searl Effect is ann 18 inch diameter ring.
There is no cheap or easy way to make an SEG.
If we wanted to mass produce the devices, $25 million would be just enough for the facility, industrial equipment, workers, labor, licensing, legal, shipping, materials in bulk, etc.
If we wanted to demonstrate the magnetic sine wave effect where the roller doesn't need anything to keep orbiting, we need about $500,000 for the rest of the equipment.
TheRealVerbz 10 months ago
Searl worked for British Rewine Electric Company when he first made his machines. He had an entire infrastructure backing him with all the equipment necessary, all the workers, all the materials for free.
All he paid for back then was the raw neodymium at 39 pents a kilo.
When he left the Electric Company, a very rich man named George Hains funded him. When George died, 13 elderly men backed John Searl and gave him the necessary money to keep working on the project.
Today there's no one helping.
TheRealVerbz 10 months ago