I've looked into this gun, and I personally still like the AK-74 better. It's a more robust design, easier to maintain, and still shoots a fairly accurate round.
Да не, кое-как оденут, вот только как всегда забудут, что солдат надо кормить время от времени. Ну и проблемы с ориентацией (с навигацией то быш) часьтенько случаются.
I think the Russians should conseider using a modernised version of the Korobov TKB-022 assault rifle, using a somewhat longer barrel with a grenade launcher and a good sight.
@XShotGuyX Of course I am aware of bullpup design. The thing is that the TKB 022 is the shortest possible bullbpup configuration, so there is room for a slight increase in barell length, while at the same time keeping the rifle compact. Imagine my friend a Korobov with a 20 inches = 508mm barell, firing something like the 6.5 mm Grendel, and being fed by 60rd magazines. You could replace with one weapon the assault rifle, the light machinegun and the marksmans rifle!!!
@sakpan39 that would be marvelous, and i totally agree with you on a longer barrel, it would make things much better without compromising the compactness of the weapon, i would love to see a sniper configuration as well
when it comes to weapons Russian never fail to deliver the most interesting designs out there
По большей части армия сейяас голодная и без носков ! Сам служил недавно. Не до абоканов и спец жилетов! Нужна жратва ! Жрать хочу. Пойду-ка а кухню сейчас, картошку пожарю. Хехе
@HAXEPAKA тебе 19 лет и учишся во 2 классе элитной спец.школы для особо умных, но слегка недоразвитых идиотов.у тебя много друзей по палате № 6 (Наполеон, маршал Жуков, чульдрыпёс с звезды альдебаран и т.д.), которые являются большими специалистами в области военной техники.:-))))))))))))))))) ржунимагу.я в осадк выпал
@HAXEPAKA 5. Ты долбоёб). Потому, что твоего пункта 1. не существует) ты доказываешь то, чего не писал)), да и что ты докопался со своей ссылкой?))) Тебе понравилась тема в ссылке?) Так я тебе говорю, распечатай её, и тащись с этой темы хоть день и ночь)). Извини, а меня такие темы не интересуют)). А, понял, в палату №6 провели интернет)), у кого что болит, тот о том и говорит), ну да. Не забудь перед сном таблетки выпить, а то опять какую нибудь чушь напишешь))).
@gfhfktgbgtl Читай правильно, я уже давно школу закончил) насчёт Абакана согласен) это тут имеется индивидуум которому не понравился Абакан и он считает его дерьмом))
@4CaHeK НАХЕРАКА-4CaHeK 2:0.прочитал я правилно.абакан красивый ,но х.з. хороший иль дерьмо.я его тока по телеку видил.его в производство вааще по моему не запускали
@HAXEPAKA Вижу, ты сильно обиделся на меня))). Правда глаза мазолит?) Хаха это ты про меня написал то, что желаешь видеть), и если серьёзно, ты ошибся во всех пунктах, можешь не верить, меня это не волнует)). Нашел ссылку про себя?) Поздравляю. Можешь распечатать в формате А4 и на лоб себе прикрепить :D
@HAXEPAKA Ухахаха мало того, что писать не научился, так ещё и читать правильно не умеешь), не разгоняйся капсить, лучше поучи правописание и чтение))) Да уж, тут второй класс не поможет) тебе даже в первый рано)), "взрослый" ты наш). Разница между автоматом и тобой лишь в том, что от автомата толку больше), да и вообще, как то поднадоело мне тут тратить на тебя своё время).
@HAXEPAKA И ещё. Правописание проходят во 2 классе)). Эх, да 2-классник поумнее тебя в этом плане будет). Вот ты тут меня малолеткой называешь)) а сам даже правильно писать не научился :D. Не ну серьёзно, не стоит спорить с очевидными вещами. Ты высказал мнение об автомате, я высказал мнение о тебе, начался спор, в итоге оказалось что второклассник умнее тебя. Не вижу смысла данного спора.
@HAXEPAKA Мой первый комментарий содержит смысл который ты высказал про автомат, переадресованный на тебя, и это также моё мнение о тебе. Хаха не навязываешь своё мнение?))) Да не смеши), ты только ради этого и споришь тут как упёртый баран))). Твою умственную отсталость сужу по содержанию твоих же высказываний)). Это только доказывает правдивость моего первого комментария. Не стоит обижаться на правду...
@HAXEPAKA Да уж, ты прав) насчёт твоего умственного развития с тобой уж ничего не поделаешь, горбатого могила исправит)). Насчёт оскорблений кто начал то? У тебя глаза в каком месте?)) После того как я написал твои же слова только направленные на тебя, это сразу задело твои чувства)) Не понравился автомат - значит говно xD. Оказывается пиздишь на автомат и на меня). Себе противоречишь. Твои слова: пиздеть - не мешки ворочать. (С заглавной буквы начало предложения так и не научился писать))).
@HAXEPAKA Ха ха кто бы говорил про правописание :D научись для начала название республики с заглавной буквы писать, двоечник)) У тебя ещё и словарный запас хромает, без мата общаться не умеешь?) Из подворотни в интернет пришёл? Печально. А оскорбления говорят только о твоей неспособности отстоять свою точку зрения, и выставляют тебя посмешищем). Не понравился автомат? Так сделай автомат такой чтобы не говно был.. А, точно, ты же ничего не умеешь кроме как материться и хвастаться))
@HAXEPAKA А что мне на твой вопрос отвечать, будто-бы это изменит что-то. Хотя, если тебе легче станет: 19 лет мне, в армии я не был, где я по-твоему постреляю из боевого оружия? Хоть сам в армии не был, но имею хороших знакомых и друзей из этого направления. О чём говорю - знаю. Мелкий из нас - ты, если не по годам, так по умственному развитию. Такое ощущение, что общаюсь с гопотой какой-то.
@HAXEPAKA Быдло из нас какраз таки - ты, по речи видно, да и по нику как то свойственно. Знаю я таких... Побегал с Абаканом - теперь считаешь себя рэмбо и брызжишь тут слюной налево и направо, это только доказывает твоё слабоумие. Иди дальше сэкмки грызть :)
Абакан - далеко не говно. Это отличная штурмовая винтовка с возможностью стрельбы по 2 патрона. Оружие сделано так, что в этом режиме пули попадают практически в одну точку, то есть ни один бронежилет не спасёт.
The optics is way too high, cheek wield is impossible and thus the effective range and accuracy will suffer horrendously with that type setup. The AK style side-mounts are just horrible they are heavy and impractical, surely Russia can do better, or has the post cold-war budget affected Russia's R&D that much?
From the look, the an 94 and ak 74 holds similar, so I don't think it's that bad to shoot it. From David Fortier review I found this gun to be quite a piece. I would advise to google it and read it.
I love these vids of russian gadgets.. Fancy and yet I promise that next time we see pictures from conflicts like Georgia we're going to see ill equipped russian soldiers in 100 diffrent uniforms with no communications gear.. The russians, in my humble opinion really needs to take better care of their troops..
@Lordlako Russia's leadership is not ethnic Russian, caring about the soldiers and common people is not among her priorities because that does not make a quick profit.
nice outfit only personal guard and several special units
the AN-94, while performs great, has more closely fitting components, making it harder to train to maintain and harder to disassemble (like the AR-15 series rifles), therfore it should be given only to special forces, the AK-107 more than satisfies the army regular assault rifle need, great accuracy, virtually eliminated recoil, easy maintainance and great reliability like any other typical AK.
Hell, why not just replace them all with AK-107 all together.
You know I learned from Wikipedia that one of the downside of the AN-94 is that when the stock is folded, it blocks the trigger. Are the designers doing anything to counter this ? redesign the stock or something like that ?
Funnily enough we have almost the same problem with our RK95's here in finland. When the stock is folded, it does kinda block the trigger, and it does the reloading of the weapon impossible when you can't uhm, "charge" the weapon by pulling that reloading-handle-thing. (Forgot what it was called, hell, I can't even remember what it was called in finnish even though I did use that weapon for about half a year :D)
@kertaspaper94 Why on earth would you do that? a rifle is practically pointless without a stock. The stock in the folded position allows the weapon to be carried in confined spaces such as an infantry carrier, helicopter or air transport, where upon exiting it would be unfolded into a combat position. Using the weapon folded would simply result in bullets sprayed wildly to little effect.
@OspreyKnight Oh really, so you don´t aim and spray on full auto then?
You can shoot accurately, even from the hip, when trained.
Guess what special forces do, they train!
And a stock can really get in the way in CQC fighting, with ranges of maybe 5 meters from the muzzle in rooms, so you wish your stock could fold neatly to the side there.
You can also still raise the rifle and use the sights, all the stock does is help control recoil, it doesnt make the gun more accurate.
@Chrinik Am a soldier. I participate in shooting military competitions. I train with special forces for competition, and I train to follow them into combat as a photographer. You don't know shit bub.
Stocks stabilize the firing platform with another point of contact. When not using a stock a trick I was shown is to push the weapon into the sling to create a more stable platform. If you know what you're doing you can maneuver.
Hooligans fire from the hip. Warriors aim their weapons.
@OspreyKnight Oh and by the way, Obergefreiter Kühle, at your service. I know my way around weapons with foldable stocks since the G36 has one. I am able to hit with the stock folded. If you can´t, well...then you should maybe consider training more with your "special forces", since they don´t seem to be able to show you how.
And I was just a grunt.
Also, I talked about SHORT RANGES, ranges below 10 meters...if you cannot hit there, you fail shit as a shooter, it´s just the way it is.
@Chrinik sure you could do that. But that is still making your life harder. weapon with a stock at the low ready takes less time to get on target consistently than trying to aim(in your case a 5 pound, half meter long rifle) like a pistol. Using your sling as a stock like I said before would be faster than both and I have seen it done that way.
@OspreyKnight I don´t aim it like a pistol, I aimed it like a rifle...without a stock...
Stance was the same, even used the scope and reddot sights, no problem aiming, no problem hitting.
And that was at a 150m range...
Yes, using the stock is easier if you are used to it and actually have the room to raise it, but if your rifle has a folding stock and shit might get very cramped, you better also learn to use it that way, since you might have too at one point.
@OspreyKnight Maybe it is easier for me because my gun never came equipped with any kind of iron sights...
Also, it would be longer then half a meter, the G36 unfolded is as long as the M16...a full meter.
BUT, my point was not what is better, but that a rifle is not "useless" just because it misses a stock. As I said, if you train to use your rifle without a stock, you can still hit. You made it sound like you couldn´t hit the broadside of a barn with the flip of a switch anymore.
I'll admit I don't have a lot of experience with folding stocks since we don't have any in our military(baring socom). Still, I've never seen any professional soldier anywhere shooting it like you describe unless they were trying to look cool. Sure it's possible, I cannot dispute that. I've done that with my personal weapons. But it's awkward, slow and inaccurate even at 10 meters or less.
@OspreyKnight Never had a problem. Maybe it´s because we actually get trained to do it. But I don´t find 10 meters to be a hard range to hit a human sized target with a couple of roughly aimed shots. Sure, it´s not "accurate", but you don´t go for single shot, hole in hole accuracy in CQB fighting.
Hell, I didn´t really aim the P8 at 20m distance, I just pointed it at the targets and roughly aligned the sights.
I hit all targets, with all shots, in very little time...
Да, армии конец настал! Нормального современного оружия, только 10% всё остальное старьё! Поэтому и приняли новую доктрину, что ядерный удар можем наносить первыми! Поскольку простыми вооружениями воевать не сможем!
Просто у США такая же доктрина, наша - нормальный ответ.
Также будь у нас даже на 100% наша миллионая армия вооруженна суперсовременным оружием, в любом случаи трудно бороться с ТРЁХмиллиоными НАТОвским силами. Что впрочем не означает, что не нужно вооружаться.
@Malch19 Ti prav no ne nado zabivat chto ne vse chleni NATO podderzhivayut politiku Ameriki. tak chto iz etoy 3h millionnoy armii v realnoy voyne v luchem sluchaet budet uchastvovat' million ili poltora, ili zhe eto NATO voobshe razvalitsya potomuchto nemzam ili italianzam ili franzuzam budet zapadlo voevat za drug druga. IMHO
@infantrist09 V Chechne oni bili, no partiyami po 100 shtuk. A seychas ih sobirayutsya vstavit na vooruzhenie vsey armii, tolko zaymyot eto ne malo vremeni i stoit dofiga budet. poetomu vsyo delaetsya potihon'ku.
@BoTTeNBR No, the main infantry rifle for the Russian Federation is the AK-74M. The An-94 is a prototype rifle made around the mid-ninteys, but (and this may be incorrect) was believed to be issued in small numbers to Spetsnaz groups.
Слышь,kalysto69 ,ты ебаный урод.Ды я тебя сам в первую очередь сотру с лица земли,мудила ты хуева.у тебя вместо мозгов ковбойское гавно,мразь ты ебучая.Отсос тупой
Barmitsa is old.. German soldier of the future and FELIN equipment are so great but Russia will get improved Barmitsa in 2015 it will be called Ratnik and it will be also with exoskeleton
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Yeah sure, this equipment was soooo good, that the pigs, sorry, the russians decided to by to by the French Felyn instead of fielding their own equipment
Are you from Fuckistan LokiG36? Did Russians fuck your mother in the ass? If they didn't, I fuck your family, your mother, sister and wife, you fucking pig cocksucker.
I am not from Fuckistan, and the russians did not fuck any of my relatives, but they did send my grandmother to Siberia, they did kill my grandfather and destroy the national values of my nation. They also had fun running their tanks through our churches and telling us that religion is the "opium for the people" . I will always hate people like you, and do my best to diminish your numbers.
lol... your shity story smells with lie... looks like you took all cliches and united'em in one pulp fiction: "kommisars, seberia, GULAG, tanks, represions..." I think you are just ignorant stupid hater from 3rd world country
Dai idi ta nahui, nechevo mne s taboi sporiti ob tom shto proizoslo s moei semiioi. Ia to znaiu lutshe tebeia cerez shto prosli moi predki. Sam ti nenavistnik i sam ti tupoi.
tebe nado bi biti stadno za to shto tvoi predsetniviki sdelali so mnogami narodami is cccp.
С какими это "многими"?.. и русский народ подвергался репрессиям большевиков на равне с остальными и пострадал больше всех кстати ... Ну а вообще, глядя на зверей вроде тебя, мне думается, что все-таки в некоторых случаях большевички были правы, жаль не довели дело до конца.
Yeah You'r right American's carry more equipment- usless equipment. Each 1st infantry carries over 50lbs. making them slower than Russian troops XD >>> 2:17 sick sick sick KILLA MAMA FUCKAS! GO PWN DA U.S.
I'll put it this way. If you wanna shoot through wooden or other thin walls and kill someone on the other side like you would in houses or flats you'd prefer 7.62 as 5.45 and 5.56 don't have the penetrative power of the heavier bullet. It will also REALLY hurt the person even if armor is worn. Its only a little heavier yet the punch it provides is lots stronger then 5.45 and 5.56
The Russian Body Armor company "Fort" has a prototype similar to the French Felin system.
But, this company mostly produces equipment in small amounts for the Russian Military.
The "Barmitsa" kits are still not the standard equipment in the Russian Army, Russian retired officers like Ivashov and Vladimirov understand that "cutting corners" is harmful, but the Civilian Accountants and "Managers" in the Russian Defense Ministry do not.
Cutting corners is never the answer,but complex systems like the US "land warrior " I think will only slow down the soldier.That's why I like the FELIN(it does not drown the soldier in info.)
And yeah,civilian accountants are pain in the ass,they usually don't even know how to carry a rifle .
Very nice video, I saw the original program. Although far from realistic, it is obvious the 1P29 optical sight they show here was designed for the AK-74M, with the way it is attached on the AN-94 you could not hit a pumpkin from 20 meters away if trying to use it. As for the helmets and body armor, as a new recruit in the Russian Army you would be lucky to get a modernized SSh-68M(TSVM[Kevlar] layers with added weight). Normally nothing more than a regular steel SSh-60(made between 1960-1980).
Body armor - 6B3 and 6B5, the standard vests, made between 1986 and 1998.
Rifle - AKM or AK-74(without the "M"), made between 1958 and 1992.
The 6B7(or 6B26/27/28) full "Kevlar" helmets, 6B13 vests(and their variants), and 1P29 sights are only issued for "special" PR events(like in the video). In reality very few units have them and use them. Mostly old Soviet equipment is issued.
All this equipment in every Russian Infantry Squad would be fantastic, in reality it simply is not priority.
Perhaps, with a different Minister of Finance(not like Kudrin who sent Russian Gold and Currency Reserves to US Banks), and a new Minister of Defense(not the current Leningrad Furniture Salesman Serdyukov) enough financing would be available for these kits for every soldier in the Russian Army.
WarGamerHistorian --- They are not a republic , founding fathers , made it a republic , but it lost all factors which made them a republic. THEY are dirty imperialist bastards ...
Yes I hate them too, but you are hating them for things that doen't exist, just look at the UN, they pretend their in charge of keeping the peice, but everyone knows America will only pull out of the Middle East when terrorists are forced out and they are allowed to occupy the oil fields.
314Pala314 -- Look at USA ,,, CCCP desintegrated peacefully , USA , economic crisis made it to , record of invasions since 1979 ,.,, Grenada 1983 , Iraq 1991 , Serbia 1999 , Bosnia 1995 , Afganistan 2001 , Iraq 2003 , What is next ,.,.. HEY look at the real enemy of the world peace , every country on earth now wants to have long range Nuclear missiles , to protect themselves from USA imperialism ,.,, NOT RUSSIA ...
The Roman Empire was also a "republic", calling oneself a "republic" does not change the fact that the US has over 400 Military bases around the World and control dozens of countries, not even the British Empire had this much control.
Russian land warrior program?
fw1091 3 weeks ago
cool looking equipment, but english subtitles would be nice
Atvor 1 month ago
Но ведь дествительно, ведь лучше иметь 2 вертолета, чем отряд "суперсолдатов" со стрелковым оружием.
dyotomi 1 month ago
нашли что показывать. у америкосов это уже несколько лет на службе, а мы все "будет"
DmitryDaren 3 months ago
omg! cool weapon)
PailinAC 3 months ago
barmistva?
Dan42ize 3 months ago
Bear Calvary?!
Classicjarheads 5 months ago
не носят по своему опыту говарю
soltrei7 5 months ago
dear Santa...
ComradeCody 6 months ago 7
Ha ha ha haa, you hiden comunist ! , go no were with that shit...ha ha ha
BlauLion 7 months ago
look at 1:35 ...what a retarded shooting stance, they dont absorb the recoil if they shoot like that.. :P
and this "kit" have existed in my army for 20 years and in the american one maybe 30 years..good morning russia.
LudwigSwede 8 months ago
I've looked into this gun, and I personally still like the AK-74 better. It's a more robust design, easier to maintain, and still shoots a fairly accurate round.
SPT6767 8 months ago
russian infantry seems to be more modern now.
RockRebel1998 8 months ago
В нормальных странах экипировку разрабатывают военные специалисты и ученые несколько лет.А у нас новую форму придумал кто?Юдашкин блядь!
TheAttacka 8 months ago
блять они в конце так говорят о целеуказателе и компьютере, как будто в НАТО этого еще нет
DmitryDaren 9 months ago
солдат - переодетый прапор - имбицил...
Bomj74 9 months ago
Всё равно голожопыми воевать отправят.
Edward22050 10 months ago 36
@Edward22050
Да не, кое-как оденут, вот только как всегда забудут, что солдат надо кормить время от времени. Ну и проблемы с ориентацией (с навигацией то быш) часьтенько случаются.
SwineNahNah 8 months ago
@Edward22050 xaxaxaxaxaxaxaxaxa
shammy63 6 months ago
@Edward22050 тебя - да
STALKERBooka 2 months ago
I think the Russians should conseider using a modernised version of the Korobov TKB-022 assault rifle, using a somewhat longer barrel with a grenade launcher and a good sight.
sakpan39 11 months ago
@sakpan39 "longer barrel" hahah ever heard of a bullpup design? the barrel is 16.3 inches = 415 mm long
XShotGuyX 9 months ago
@XShotGuyX Of course I am aware of bullpup design. The thing is that the TKB 022 is the shortest possible bullbpup configuration, so there is room for a slight increase in barell length, while at the same time keeping the rifle compact. Imagine my friend a Korobov with a 20 inches = 508mm barell, firing something like the 6.5 mm Grendel, and being fed by 60rd magazines. You could replace with one weapon the assault rifle, the light machinegun and the marksmans rifle!!!
sakpan39 9 months ago
@sakpan39 that would be marvelous, and i totally agree with you on a longer barrel, it would make things much better without compromising the compactness of the weapon, i would love to see a sniper configuration as well
when it comes to weapons Russian never fail to deliver the most interesting designs out there
XShotGuyX 9 months ago
компьютерная графика в конце уже совсем убила))
Пропаганда такая пропаганда!
DeDustMet 11 months ago
@HAXEPAKA московский не московский, а вашу тусовку я тревожить не хочу)
4CaHeK 11 months ago
@HAXEPAKA Спи спокойно)
4CaHeK 11 months ago
@HAXEPAKA Г. Рига, да. Легче стало?
4CaHeK 11 months ago
@HAXEPAKA Я по крайней мере читаю правильно)) по гороскопу лев, сам Рижанин, не знаю только, какой смысл от этого...
4CaHeK 11 months ago
По большей части армия сейяас голодная и без носков ! Сам служил недавно. Не до абоканов и спец жилетов! Нужна жратва ! Жрать хочу. Пойду-ка а кухню сейчас, картошку пожарю. Хехе
Shaitantoo 11 months ago
@HAXEPAKA тебе 19 лет и учишся во 2 классе элитной спец.школы для особо умных, но слегка недоразвитых идиотов.у тебя много друзей по палате № 6 (Наполеон, маршал Жуков, чульдрыпёс с звезды альдебаран и т.д.), которые являются большими специалистами в области военной техники.:-))))))))))))))))) ржунимагу.я в осадк выпал
gfhfktgbgtl 11 months ago
@HAXEPAKA 5. Ты долбоёб). Потому, что твоего пункта 1. не существует) ты доказываешь то, чего не писал)), да и что ты докопался со своей ссылкой?))) Тебе понравилась тема в ссылке?) Так я тебе говорю, распечатай её, и тащись с этой темы хоть день и ночь)). Извини, а меня такие темы не интересуют)). А, понял, в палату №6 провели интернет)), у кого что болит, тот о том и говорит), ну да. Не забудь перед сном таблетки выпить, а то опять какую нибудь чушь напишешь))).
4CaHeK 11 months ago
@4CaHeK НАХЕРАКА-@ 4CaHeK 1:0 кусалово идет супер . 4CaHeK ты правда дибил какуюту хуйню морозиш. 19 лет и в 2 классе :-) а абакан четкий.красивый
gfhfktgbgtl 11 months ago
@gfhfktgbgtl Читай правильно, я уже давно школу закончил) насчёт Абакана согласен) это тут имеется индивидуум которому не понравился Абакан и он считает его дерьмом))
4CaHeK 11 months ago
@4CaHeK НАХЕРАКА-4CaHeK 2:0.прочитал я правилно.абакан красивый ,но х.з. хороший иль дерьмо.я его тока по телеку видил.его в производство вааще по моему не запускали
gfhfktgbgtl 11 months ago
@gfhfktgbgtl Ещё один не научившийся читать индивидуум) вы там что, кружок дебилов организовали? :D
4CaHeK 11 months ago
@4CaHeK ага.третьим будешь?
gfhfktgbgtl 11 months ago
@gfhfktgbgtl Нет, спасибо.
4CaHeK 11 months ago
@HAXEPAKA Вижу, ты сильно обиделся на меня))). Правда глаза мазолит?) Хаха это ты про меня написал то, что желаешь видеть), и если серьёзно, ты ошибся во всех пунктах, можешь не верить, меня это не волнует)). Нашел ссылку про себя?) Поздравляю. Можешь распечатать в формате А4 и на лоб себе прикрепить :D
4CaHeK 11 months ago
@HAXEPAKA Ухахаха мало того, что писать не научился, так ещё и читать правильно не умеешь), не разгоняйся капсить, лучше поучи правописание и чтение))) Да уж, тут второй класс не поможет) тебе даже в первый рано)), "взрослый" ты наш). Разница между автоматом и тобой лишь в том, что от автомата толку больше), да и вообще, как то поднадоело мне тут тратить на тебя своё время).
4CaHeK 11 months ago
@HAXEPAKA И ещё. Правописание проходят во 2 классе)). Эх, да 2-классник поумнее тебя в этом плане будет). Вот ты тут меня малолеткой называешь)) а сам даже правильно писать не научился :D. Не ну серьёзно, не стоит спорить с очевидными вещами. Ты высказал мнение об автомате, я высказал мнение о тебе, начался спор, в итоге оказалось что второклассник умнее тебя. Не вижу смысла данного спора.
4CaHeK 11 months ago
@HAXEPAKA Мой первый комментарий содержит смысл который ты высказал про автомат, переадресованный на тебя, и это также моё мнение о тебе. Хаха не навязываешь своё мнение?))) Да не смеши), ты только ради этого и споришь тут как упёртый баран))). Твою умственную отсталость сужу по содержанию твоих же высказываний)). Это только доказывает правдивость моего первого комментария. Не стоит обижаться на правду...
4CaHeK 11 months ago
@HAXEPAKA Да уж, ты прав) насчёт твоего умственного развития с тобой уж ничего не поделаешь, горбатого могила исправит)). Насчёт оскорблений кто начал то? У тебя глаза в каком месте?)) После того как я написал твои же слова только направленные на тебя, это сразу задело твои чувства)) Не понравился автомат - значит говно xD. Оказывается пиздишь на автомат и на меня). Себе противоречишь. Твои слова: пиздеть - не мешки ворочать. (С заглавной буквы начало предложения так и не научился писать))).
4CaHeK 11 months ago
@HAXEPAKA Ха ха кто бы говорил про правописание :D научись для начала название республики с заглавной буквы писать, двоечник)) У тебя ещё и словарный запас хромает, без мата общаться не умеешь?) Из подворотни в интернет пришёл? Печально. А оскорбления говорят только о твоей неспособности отстоять свою точку зрения, и выставляют тебя посмешищем). Не понравился автомат? Так сделай автомат такой чтобы не говно был.. А, точно, ты же ничего не умеешь кроме как материться и хвастаться))
4CaHeK 11 months ago
@HAXEPAKA А что мне на твой вопрос отвечать, будто-бы это изменит что-то. Хотя, если тебе легче станет: 19 лет мне, в армии я не был, где я по-твоему постреляю из боевого оружия? Хоть сам в армии не был, но имею хороших знакомых и друзей из этого направления. О чём говорю - знаю. Мелкий из нас - ты, если не по годам, так по умственному развитию. Такое ощущение, что общаюсь с гопотой какой-то.
4CaHeK 11 months ago
@HAXEPAKA Быдло из нас какраз таки - ты, по речи видно, да и по нику как то свойственно. Знаю я таких... Побегал с Абаканом - теперь считаешь себя рэмбо и брызжишь тут слюной налево и направо, это только доказывает твоё слабоумие. Иди дальше сэкмки грызть :)
4CaHeK 11 months ago
@HAXEPAKA Молодец, иди побегай ещё недели три, почему-то ни от кого больше не слышал плохих отзывов об Абакане.
4CaHeK 11 months ago
@HAXEPAKA говно у тебя в жопе, да в голове.
4CaHeK 11 months ago
Абакан - далеко не говно. Это отличная штурмовая винтовка с возможностью стрельбы по 2 патрона. Оружие сделано так, что в этом режиме пули попадают практически в одну точку, то есть ни один бронежилет не спасёт.
FahrenheitHD 1 year ago
The optics is way too high, cheek wield is impossible and thus the effective range and accuracy will suffer horrendously with that type setup. The AK style side-mounts are just horrible they are heavy and impractical, surely Russia can do better, or has the post cold-war budget affected Russia's R&D that much?
adobo777 1 year ago
AN-94 ABAKAN THE M-16 SERIES KILLER =)
DJMikaelito 1 year ago
@DJMikaelito it would be if it wasn't so damn unergonomic and uncomfortable to shoot
Also, it's A LOT more complicated and expensive to produce and maintain than an AK-model
Besides, the latest AK-models (AK107/108) have a burst-fire function if you're into that (as well as an interesting counter-recoil system)
GreveSparf 1 year ago
@GreveSparf
Agree AK is the king of the weapons =)
DJMikaelito 1 year ago
@GreveSparf
From the look, the an 94 and ak 74 holds similar, so I don't think it's that bad to shoot it. From David Fortier review I found this gun to be quite a piece. I would advise to google it and read it.
neblogenso 1 year ago
I love these vids of russian gadgets.. Fancy and yet I promise that next time we see pictures from conflicts like Georgia we're going to see ill equipped russian soldiers in 100 diffrent uniforms with no communications gear.. The russians, in my humble opinion really needs to take better care of their troops..
Lordlako 1 year ago
@Lordlako Russia's leadership is not ethnic Russian, caring about the soldiers and common people is not among her priorities because that does not make a quick profit.
nice outfit only personal guard and several special units
loki4145 1 year ago
What type of optical sight was on that Abakan?
adrianrubi 1 year ago
only the best units are going to get this, we'll still be seeing russian soldiers advancing with ak-74's and the cold warish helmet for a long time
poonjoo 1 year ago
Who's going to nuke who 1st????
G0FlyAKite1 1 year ago
didn't think russian military wore body armor and vests
0neofthem 1 year ago
"Barmitsa" in russian means a coil armor part of russian medieval helmets
georgysb 1 year ago
xDD yeah russia wird zu hello
TheDima999 1 year ago
the AN-94, while performs great, has more closely fitting components, making it harder to train to maintain and harder to disassemble (like the AR-15 series rifles), therfore it should be given only to special forces, the AK-107 more than satisfies the army regular assault rifle need, great accuracy, virtually eliminated recoil, easy maintainance and great reliability like any other typical AK.
Hell, why not just replace them all with AK-107 all together.
Ome99 1 year ago
@Ome99 dude.. its all coz of fat and old dickheads in our army headquarter. they think its too complex. so i think it wont happen in 5-7 years(
sorry for my eng
U378U 1 year ago
You know I learned from Wikipedia that one of the downside of the AN-94 is that when the stock is folded, it blocks the trigger. Are the designers doing anything to counter this ? redesign the stock or something like that ?
kertaspaper94 1 year ago
@kertaspaper94
Last time I saw it on an exhibition without any changes at the stock
abraqadabra 1 year ago 2
@kertaspaper94 Why would you want to fire it folded?
bigblockcrx 1 year ago
@bigblockcrx to show off
kertaspaper94 1 year ago
@bigblockcrx CQB maneuverability, obviously
GreveSparf 1 year ago
@kertaspaper94
Funnily enough we have almost the same problem with our RK95's here in finland. When the stock is folded, it does kinda block the trigger, and it does the reloading of the weapon impossible when you can't uhm, "charge" the weapon by pulling that reloading-handle-thing. (Forgot what it was called, hell, I can't even remember what it was called in finnish even though I did use that weapon for about half a year :D)
metsapeikkoo 1 year ago
@kertaspaper94
AK107 is a better option anyway for mass production. Conscripts will not make good use of the double tap on the AN94...
Xerxes17 11 months ago
@kertaspaper94 Why on earth would you do that? a rifle is practically pointless without a stock. The stock in the folded position allows the weapon to be carried in confined spaces such as an infantry carrier, helicopter or air transport, where upon exiting it would be unfolded into a combat position. Using the weapon folded would simply result in bullets sprayed wildly to little effect.
OspreyKnight 9 months ago
@OspreyKnight Oh really, so you don´t aim and spray on full auto then?
You can shoot accurately, even from the hip, when trained.
Guess what special forces do, they train!
And a stock can really get in the way in CQC fighting, with ranges of maybe 5 meters from the muzzle in rooms, so you wish your stock could fold neatly to the side there.
You can also still raise the rifle and use the sights, all the stock does is help control recoil, it doesnt make the gun more accurate.
Chrinik 9 months ago
@Chrinik Am a soldier. I participate in shooting military competitions. I train with special forces for competition, and I train to follow them into combat as a photographer. You don't know shit bub.
Stocks stabilize the firing platform with another point of contact. When not using a stock a trick I was shown is to push the weapon into the sling to create a more stable platform. If you know what you're doing you can maneuver.
Hooligans fire from the hip. Warriors aim their weapons.
OspreyKnight 9 months ago
@OspreyKnight I don´t know shit huh? Well then you fucking misunderstood me you pompurous ass.
If you take the stock off, use the sights on your gun, ALIGN THEM PROPERLY and fire, the shot is still gonna land where you aimed.
Sure, the gun will kick harder because it doesn´t have the stock to help you control it, but otherwise a stock doesn´t much account for accuracy.
Sure, aiming is harder, but with patience you could still hit over long distances.
I never said anything about NOT AIMING. Idiot
Chrinik 9 months ago
@OspreyKnight Oh and by the way, Obergefreiter Kühle, at your service. I know my way around weapons with foldable stocks since the G36 has one. I am able to hit with the stock folded. If you can´t, well...then you should maybe consider training more with your "special forces", since they don´t seem to be able to show you how.
And I was just a grunt.
Also, I talked about SHORT RANGES, ranges below 10 meters...if you cannot hit there, you fail shit as a shooter, it´s just the way it is.
Chrinik 9 months ago
@Chrinik sure you could do that. But that is still making your life harder. weapon with a stock at the low ready takes less time to get on target consistently than trying to aim(in your case a 5 pound, half meter long rifle) like a pistol. Using your sling as a stock like I said before would be faster than both and I have seen it done that way.
OspreyKnight 7 months ago
@OspreyKnight I don´t aim it like a pistol, I aimed it like a rifle...without a stock...
Stance was the same, even used the scope and reddot sights, no problem aiming, no problem hitting.
And that was at a 150m range...
Yes, using the stock is easier if you are used to it and actually have the room to raise it, but if your rifle has a folding stock and shit might get very cramped, you better also learn to use it that way, since you might have too at one point.
I dunno, I never had a problem.
Chrinik 7 months ago
@OspreyKnight Maybe it is easier for me because my gun never came equipped with any kind of iron sights...
Also, it would be longer then half a meter, the G36 unfolded is as long as the M16...a full meter.
BUT, my point was not what is better, but that a rifle is not "useless" just because it misses a stock. As I said, if you train to use your rifle without a stock, you can still hit. You made it sound like you couldn´t hit the broadside of a barn with the flip of a switch anymore.
Chrinik 7 months ago
@Chrinik I apologize. I was being a douche. I see what you're saying now. I still wouldn't ever use my weapon without the stock.
OspreyKnight 6 months ago
@OspreyKnight Noone said you had too.
But yeah, I gotta apologize too, gotten a little bit carried away with it.
Chrinik 6 months ago
@Chrinik thanks for ending a 2 month long youtube dick waving spectacle on a good note...
shammy63 6 months ago
@OspreyKnight thanks for ending a 2 month long youtube dick waving spectacle on a good note...
shammy63 6 months ago
I'll admit I don't have a lot of experience with folding stocks since we don't have any in our military(baring socom). Still, I've never seen any professional soldier anywhere shooting it like you describe unless they were trying to look cool. Sure it's possible, I cannot dispute that. I've done that with my personal weapons. But it's awkward, slow and inaccurate even at 10 meters or less.
OspreyKnight 7 months ago
@OspreyKnight Never had a problem. Maybe it´s because we actually get trained to do it. But I don´t find 10 meters to be a hard range to hit a human sized target with a couple of roughly aimed shots. Sure, it´s not "accurate", but you don´t go for single shot, hole in hole accuracy in CQB fighting.
Hell, I didn´t really aim the P8 at 20m distance, I just pointed it at the targets and roughly aligned the sights.
I hit all targets, with all shots, in very little time...
Chrinik 7 months ago
i wish i was russian :(
Conscript626 1 year ago 9
ajjajaaj, rosii nado armiyu svoyu snachala nakormit a potom ulle novye kaski delat xD
berkut2006 1 year ago
95 год... мда.. до сих пор солдатики в одних кирзачах и с 74-ками бегают. В Осетии вообще тихий ужас был. Слава путену, еба!
1SidIcarus1 1 year ago
@1SidIcarus1
А каски вообще образца 1941 года. И что теперь?)
Scoutrussp7 1 year ago
they are so strong !!
tipforeveryone 1 year ago
вентовка класная но не удобноя до черта
godfree19 1 year ago
солдат дебил полный ))))
godfree19 1 year ago
Надо каждого солдата одеть в такую экипировку!!!.
Godret1 1 year ago 13
@Godret1 уже лет 5 как носят.На личном опыте говорю.
RUSRomanRUS 9 months ago 20
Да, армии конец настал! Нормального современного оружия, только 10% всё остальное старьё! Поэтому и приняли новую доктрину, что ядерный удар можем наносить первыми! Поскольку простыми вооружениями воевать не сможем!
XblTb 1 year ago
Просто у США такая же доктрина, наша - нормальный ответ.
Также будь у нас даже на 100% наша миллионая армия вооруженна суперсовременным оружием, в любом случаи трудно бороться с ТРЁХмиллиоными НАТОвским силами. Что впрочем не означает, что не нужно вооружаться.
Malch19 1 year ago 3
@Malch19 Ti prav no ne nado zabivat chto ne vse chleni NATO podderzhivayut politiku Ameriki. tak chto iz etoy 3h millionnoy armii v realnoy voyne v luchem sluchaet budet uchastvovat' million ili poltora, ili zhe eto NATO voobshe razvalitsya potomuchto nemzam ili italianzam ili franzuzam budet zapadlo voevat za drug druga. IMHO
LimpBizkitRus 1 year ago
i gde zhe oni bili oni v 4e4ne.ili sej4as.soldatam vru4atj nado a ne clipi snimatj blja
infantrist09 2 years ago 7
v nature
mihanich 1 year ago
а одно мешает другому? вообще-то привлечение внимания наоборот - помогает. А чем больше внимание тем лучше для проекта.
Goldrag 1 year ago
@infantrist09 V Chechne oni bili, no partiyami po 100 shtuk. A seychas ih sobirayutsya vstavit na vooruzhenie vsey armii, tolko zaymyot eto ne malo vremeni i stoit dofiga budet. poetomu vsyo delaetsya potihon'ku.
LimpBizkitRus 1 year ago
Hey, at the end, what was that diagram of a soldier? It looked like the U.S' Landwarior/FutureSoldier concept.
Wooboo 2 years ago
Comment removed
01111983hummel 2 years ago
@01111983hummel ,
"бармица" - старорусское слово, означает защитная кольчужка на шее или свисающая со шлема.
никакого отношения к еврейской "бар-мицве" не имеет. Просьба не вводить славянские народы в заблуждение!!
abraqadabra 2 years ago 45
ааа спасиб, просвятили извиняюсь за флуд, свой пост удалил
01111983hummel 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
English subtitles would be welcomed.
deluxe007mx 2 years ago
Comment removed
deluxe007mx 2 years ago
i agree
but in russian army speak that kalashnikovs remain till 2050 year
1981TormentoR 2 years ago
no
an 94 prototype
1981TormentoR 2 years ago
An 94 entered in service few years ago.I think Aek 971 is good stuff too
TheTimurbest 2 years ago
Is the AN 94 the Russian main infantry rifle?
BoTTeNBR 2 years ago
no? AK 74 with caliber 5.45 mm main rifle (imho)
01111983hummel 2 years ago
@BoTTeNBR No, the main infantry rifle for the Russian Federation is the AK-74M. The An-94 is a prototype rifle made around the mid-ninteys, but (and this may be incorrect) was believed to be issued in small numbers to Spetsnaz groups.
Wooboo 2 years ago
@Wooboo I don´t like the AN-94 anyway. Too heavyand too complicated. I think that the AK-107 or even the AK-74M are better options.
Robbe19 1 year ago
@Robbe19 Oh, agreed. The AK-74M is an extremely competently designed weapon.
Wooboo 1 year ago
@Robbe19 well IMHO it's not intended for mass use in infantry... but in some special forces's hands, it's perfect.
dartho19 1 year ago
Ты ебнулся? 6Ш112 это разгрузка+ранец. Скопировали систему МОЛЛЕ и что тут такого? Ничего принципиально нового. Я в ней бегаю ЛИЧНО :-)))
А Бармица это броня, амуниция, снаряжение - все в одном флаконе.
yaziechnik 2 years ago
Система бармица марально устарела на смену ей идёт 6ш112 УМТБС МОЛЛЕ
Tropnuick 2 years ago
cho tam naschet horoshih botinkov soldatam?
middimar 2 years ago
Слышь,kalysto69 ,ты ебаный урод.Ды я тебя сам в первую очередь сотру с лица земли,мудила ты хуева.у тебя вместо мозгов ковбойское гавно,мразь ты ебучая.Отсос тупой
ramsharik 2 years ago
"GEARDOS!!!" the less fortunate Russian grunts would shout.
Agent1W 2 years ago
Barmitsa is old.. German soldier of the future and FELIN equipment are so great but Russia will get improved Barmitsa in 2015 it will be called Ratnik and it will be also with exoskeleton
Detroy90player 2 years ago
dude what drugs do you take 2015 and exoskeleton, maybe 2025 or 2030 an exoskeleton for special forces
SovietBear91 2 years ago
i know this is impossbile=D but we've already have got exolkeleton.. our military head said about exoskeleton not me)
Detroy90player 2 years ago
they said not full exoskeleton just a parts of it will be in 2015 in this equipment in series production for soldiers
Detroy90player 2 years ago
sorry not RAtnik will have exoskeleton in 2015 will be Fighter 21 - another russian equipment with exoskeleton
Detroy90player 2 years ago
А чё там за чувак компьютерный в конце?)))) Как говорится размечтались - хрен дождётессь. Ещё сапоги не все сносили.)))
stankomi 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yeah sure, this equipment was soooo good, that the pigs, sorry, the russians decided to by to by the French Felyn instead of fielding their own equipment
LokiG36 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nazi fuck off.
Mogger3 2 years ago
don't say nonsense.
yes,we wanna to buy some french equipment,but just a little part.we already work for the future soldier's equipment.
andreyRUS17 2 years ago
Are you from Fuckistan LokiG36? Did Russians fuck your mother in the ass? If they didn't, I fuck your family, your mother, sister and wife, you fucking pig cocksucker.
mikeplay007 2 years ago
Dear pig007,
I am not from Fuckistan, and the russians did not fuck any of my relatives, but they did send my grandmother to Siberia, they did kill my grandfather and destroy the national values of my nation. They also had fun running their tanks through our churches and telling us that religion is the "opium for the people" . I will always hate people like you, and do my best to diminish your numbers.
With utter hate,
LokiG36
LokiG36 2 years ago
@LokiG36
lol... your shity story smells with lie... looks like you took all cliches and united'em in one pulp fiction: "kommisars, seberia, GULAG, tanks, represions..." I think you are just ignorant stupid hater from 3rd world country
capitanTyTy 2 years ago 3
Dai idi ta nahui, nechevo mne s taboi sporiti ob tom shto proizoslo s moei semiioi. Ia to znaiu lutshe tebeia cerez shto prosli moi predki. Sam ti nenavistnik i sam ti tupoi.
tebe nado bi biti stadno za to shto tvoi predsetniviki sdelali so mnogami narodami is cccp.
LokiG36 2 years ago
С какими это "многими"?.. и русский народ подвергался репрессиям большевиков на равне с остальными и пострадал больше всех кстати ... Ну а вообще, глядя на зверей вроде тебя, мне думается, что все-таки в некоторых случаях большевички были правы, жаль не довели дело до конца.
capitanTyTy 2 years ago
i chto zhe oni sdelali? sam ja ne russkij, no xoteos by uslyshat tvoj pojasnenija
jaendos 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
people like you need to be exterminated. not just in your country but russia too.
kalysto69 2 years ago
only russian or slovak
Prorok107 2 years ago
Yeah You'r right American's carry more equipment- usless equipment. Each 1st infantry carries over 50lbs. making them slower than Russian troops XD >>> 2:17 sick sick sick KILLA MAMA FUCKAS! GO PWN DA U.S.
ongolos 2 years ago 2
the commentator said,that this equipment was shown in 1995
andreyRUS17 2 years ago
I may be wrong, but the American fighting man may be more well equipped.
XxMusashiYamatoxX 2 years ago
it's equipment from 1995
andreyRUS17 2 years ago 3
мы будем это все за рубеж продавать,а наши будут с ак-74 бегать
andreyRUS17 2 years ago 4
жжош ))
бармица впрочем адин хер гавно имхо
sabagaparada 2 years ago
Неплохо, но можно лучше.
MrDajdbog 2 years ago
Barmitsa took a full thirteen years to reach maturity.
nagmashdriver 2 years ago
"advanced small arm (AN-94 'Abakan')"
WTF... AN-94 Abakan is a rifle x_x(similar to ak )
Weakly332 2 years ago
"Small arms" is term describing portable firearms - pistols, smgs, ar, sniper rifles.
DudeNumberOnePlus 2 years ago
Do you even understand remotely how the AN-94 operates? It is nothing like the Kalash internally. It acts more like the G11 than anything else.
vogonford 2 years ago
Yes , i know , and it is not like AK in technology , but it was built like the AK (like size and weight) - i meant that
Weakly332 2 years ago
You are complete idiot
AN-94 is COMPLETELY diferent riffle than AK !
It has completely different mechanisms, technology and functionality than AK !
DiscoverRussia 2 years ago 37
By saying :"You are complete idiot" you just show your real face moron
And i alredy said that they have different mechanisms... check out my las post,blind man.
I said that it is made to be the same as AK in size and weight but un mechanical side.
Weakly332 2 years ago
@DiscoverRussia
Yet it does the same job exactly the same as it's predecessors. I'll take the old AK's over the AN94.
Wags182494 1 year ago
Do the Russian soldiers like the 5.45 ammo?
wwood14 2 years ago
I'll put it this way. If you wanna shoot through wooden or other thin walls and kill someone on the other side like you would in houses or flats you'd prefer 7.62 as 5.45 and 5.56 don't have the penetrative power of the heavier bullet. It will also REALLY hurt the person even if armor is worn. Its only a little heavier yet the punch it provides is lots stronger then 5.45 and 5.56
Spetsnazovets 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
WoW, will they now survive much longer than a minute ?
EmperorofTerra 2 years ago
вы их пригласите на отборочные на олимпиаду, позади стоять, дадите фору Болту, гамарджоба, мартышкин.
protfl 2 years ago
Hell russia is even advancing better then the U.S.
Lawldead99 2 years ago 3
Indeed. Russian army is back on the business.
BWkaptein 2 years ago 5
Hahahahahaha...You funny guy.
DOSU344 2 years ago
LoL, I guess you had a very very very very fantastic dream in the morning
EmperorofTerra 2 years ago
I would like to see systems like the FELIN in the Russian army .
ludgidia123 2 years ago
The Russian Body Armor company "Fort" has a prototype similar to the French Felin system.
But, this company mostly produces equipment in small amounts for the Russian Military.
The "Barmitsa" kits are still not the standard equipment in the Russian Army, Russian retired officers like Ivashov and Vladimirov understand that "cutting corners" is harmful, but the Civilian Accountants and "Managers" in the Russian Defense Ministry do not.
Maloross 2 years ago 3
Cutting corners is never the answer,but complex systems like the US "land warrior " I think will only slow down the soldier.That's why I like the FELIN(it does not drown the soldier in info.)
And yeah,civilian accountants are pain in the ass,they usually don't even know how to carry a rifle .
ludgidia123 2 years ago
WarGamerHistorian --- YOUR country is an empire , sooner or later people will rebel , and empire FALLS , after a huge WAR ,,, OK ,, get over it ,,
aviomaster 2 years ago
Its the first empire based on freedom..
richter75 2 years ago
Very nice video, I saw the original program. Although far from realistic, it is obvious the 1P29 optical sight they show here was designed for the AK-74M, with the way it is attached on the AN-94 you could not hit a pumpkin from 20 meters away if trying to use it. As for the helmets and body armor, as a new recruit in the Russian Army you would be lucky to get a modernized SSh-68M(TSVM[Kevlar] layers with added weight). Normally nothing more than a regular steel SSh-60(made between 1960-1980).
Maloross 2 years ago
Body armor - 6B3 and 6B5, the standard vests, made between 1986 and 1998.
Rifle - AKM or AK-74(without the "M"), made between 1958 and 1992.
The 6B7(or 6B26/27/28) full "Kevlar" helmets, 6B13 vests(and their variants), and 1P29 sights are only issued for "special" PR events(like in the video). In reality very few units have them and use them. Mostly old Soviet equipment is issued.
All this equipment in every Russian Infantry Squad would be fantastic, in reality it simply is not priority.
Maloross 2 years ago
Perhaps, with a different Minister of Finance(not like Kudrin who sent Russian Gold and Currency Reserves to US Banks), and a new Minister of Defense(not the current Leningrad Furniture Salesman Serdyukov) enough financing would be available for these kits for every soldier in the Russian Army.
Maloross 2 years ago
WarGamerHistorian --- They are not a republic , founding fathers , made it a republic , but it lost all factors which made them a republic. THEY are dirty imperialist bastards ...
aviomaster 2 years ago
Yes I hate them too, but you are hating them for things that doen't exist, just look at the UN, they pretend their in charge of keeping the peice, but everyone knows America will only pull out of the Middle East when terrorists are forced out and they are allowed to occupy the oil fields.
WarGamerHistorian 2 years ago
314Pala314 -- Look at USA ,,, CCCP desintegrated peacefully , USA , economic crisis made it to , record of invasions since 1979 ,.,, Grenada 1983 , Iraq 1991 , Serbia 1999 , Bosnia 1995 , Afganistan 2001 , Iraq 2003 , What is next ,.,.. HEY look at the real enemy of the world peace , every country on earth now wants to have long range Nuclear missiles , to protect themselves from USA imperialism ,.,, NOT RUSSIA ...
aviomaster 2 years ago 4
I don't like America, and I disagree with you, your an extremest! American Imperialsom, they are a Republic!
WarGamerHistorian 2 years ago
The Roman Empire was also a "republic", calling oneself a "republic" does not change the fact that the US has over 400 Military bases around the World and control dozens of countries, not even the British Empire had this much control.
Maloross 2 years ago