Added: 3 years ago
From: msnbcReporter
Views: 5,484
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (35)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Am i the only one that came here for Michael Ian Black?

  • I love your vid! Good work. Check mine too on?? my channel.

    

  • The Clinton's don' use computers either. Next time do your research Rachel.  I am not sure if anyone will notice if you eventually do get it right because nobody watches your show!

  • guys stop arguing about this shit... it doesnt matter anymore

  • Comment removed

  • i don't care what he knows even if he has the answer to life if he can't use a computer he isn't worth voting for.

  • Oh and Bustinbush can't read so don't refer that person to wikipedia! :-)

  • Typical liberal media. JoeVinOPKS, you hit the nail on the head with your post! Good job!

  • McCain's captors routinely dislocated his shoulders, beat him with a pipe, and hung him to a ceiling with his arms tied behind his back. And because of all that, he can't use a keyboard, or comb his hair, or tie his shoes. This man suffered more in one day for the cause of freedom than smart alecky propagandists like you are liable to suffer in a lifetime, and you have the audacity to mock him because he can't use a keyboard?! Good grief, this is supposed to be journalism?!

  • Bullshit, were you there to witness this BS or is it just regurgitated lies?

  • BustinBush, you can read about McCain's POW experiences on the Wikipedia article about him, among many other places. Amazing that you ridicule McCain for not being able to use a keyboard (which the Boston Globe reported in 2000) when you could have used your own keyboard to google this subject and look up the facts about McCain's experiences as a POW. I get the idea you're not interested in learning the truth, though.

  • JoeVinOPKS... you are aware that Wikipedia derives its information from the general public correct? Also, in most companies, schools, newspapers, etc, Wikipedia is not considered a reliable resource, mainly because of it's lack of filter and it's inability to count it's facts as credible or true. Thus if you're basing your information and devotion of McCain on Wikipedia you may want to try researching on a more legitimate resource, perhaps the "world wide interweb" as you repubs refer to it.

  • I mentioned Wikipedia because it contains a good summary of McCain's experience as a POW, and you use it as an excuse to bash Republicans. Did you even check the Wikipedia article? If you had, you would have seen that virtually every sentence of the account is sourced with references from the NY Times, Washington Post, Vanity Fair, Arizona Republic (hardly conservative publications), and various books that have been written about McCain's POW experiences. Check your facts before you criticize.

  • I am very well aware of the references to different publications from Wikipedia, however you do not see publications quoting Wikipedia. I am simply stating that Wikipedia is hardly a credible source for sound and accurate facts, nor is it a basis for such fervent support of a candidate who doesn't know how to use a computer.

  • The article references multiple sources that detail McCain's POW experiences. You admit that it does this, and you do not cite a single factual error in the article. Yet you dismiss the citation of the article anyway, because why? Because it's Wikipedia, that's why. Fine, be like that. Then read the references cited by the article, as they make the case for McCain's heroism just fine. It's the facts that make me support his candidacy, not that those facts happened to be cited in Wikipedia.

  • if you didn't know... Obamas and McCains Wikipedia page is watched fervently by there supporters. Both of their pages are like a campaign ads. The PERFECT EXAMPLE is Sarah Palin. If you looked at her wikipedia page before her vice president candidacy was announced, it was less than a page long. Now there are several articles about her. Wikipedia is now a public resume for politicians.

  • In response to the comment about FDR using a telegram, I'm sure he was at least knew how to send a telegram, regardless of whether he was physically capable of doing it. I suppose it is a bit much to ask that the president know how to use the internet, but then again maybe it's also a bit much to ask that the president know which countries exist and don't exist (Czechoslovakia) but then again look at our track record we did elect the man who runs into doors and can't complete coherent sentences.

  • JoeVinOPKS is right

  • please! stop insulting all our intelligence and just TRY to open your thinking for a minute...

    who cares if he's physically unable to use a keyboard - that is absolutely NO justification for knowing how it works. absolutely none. Our country has entered a new era of technology and cannot afford having a leader who is this distant from reality.

  • the guy cant type or use the mouse because of his POW injuries! dont dare make fun of that!! thank u :)

  • This is a stupid ad that will put Obama down further. Imagine an ad about FDR where it is 3AM and he needs to run down to the corner to get to a telegraph to tell Pearl Harbor they are about to be attacked. Of course FDR was crippled, not from fighting for his country but by Polio. So now Obama is making fun of the handicapped.

  • McCain cannot type because of his POW injuries.

  • Maddow = MSNBC = anti McCain

    This is not news but propaganda.

  • Of course. But it's funny. :)

  • oh rachael ur awesome...

  • MSLSD is a joke...

  • Do you want a computer-illiterate person to lead us into the future?

  • Not really but i DO want someone who knows what war is and hopefully how to fight one. I believe that a computer literate president isnt a must have at this point in history. Next election i may change my tune though.

  • dude - Mccain has trouble breathing! there is always something funny about a 200 year old man.

  • hahahaha... this guy is hilarious " itz not like therz a magic button u push n da computer turns on"

  • but, jesus never existed! google "jesusneverexisted"

  • iF OBAMA SAID HE IS JESUS(THEN YOU CAN SAY HE'S THE ANTI-CHRIST)

    SO FOR ALL YOU BITCH ASS STUPID PEOPLE THAT SAAYS HE THE ANTI CHRIST YOU ARE ALL NATURAL BORN DUMB ASSES...OBAMA HAS NUTHIN TO DO WITH THE TERM ANTI-CHRIST

  • WWooooooooow what a BRIANT DUMB as

    well there goes the most briantly dumass president that we might have

    OBama 08...oh yeah Obama Is not the anti-christ

    THE ANTI-CHRIST WILL CLAM TO BE JESUS...OBAMA NEVER SAID HE WAS JESUS

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more