This tempo is actually more likely how a minuet would have been played back then. From six different French pendulum markings from the first half of the 18th century, we find minuets being played from quarter = 126 - 231 with an average of about 190 bpm. You can read about this "Interpreting Pendulum Markings for French Baroque Dances" by Harris-Warrick. Quantz in 1752 gave the minuet quarter = 160.
Mr. Koopman, IMHO, is one of the best harpsichordists ever!!!!! Acknowledging that the trills may be excessive to some, it's still true he possesses fantastic technique which enables him to play at lightning speeds (with trills). :0
@Hyrulean112 Yes, the first part is in G Major, the Fugue switches to E Minor, then goes back to G Major when it repeats the theme. This has too many embellishments and improvisations for my taste, but to each his own.
@dropoutextreme yes, possitive. 1. It's a minuet 2. it doesn't show even one part of a fugue. Just so you know. Maybe look up what exactly qualifies a fugue...
I don't like it at all; most unpleasantly ornamented and improvised--Kipnis does much better and with more compliment to the work than the mere showing off of his own technical ability.
During the baroque period it was normal to add ornaments when the theme was repeated. Today there's a wrong way to think at Bach's works as stark and severe.
_Bach_ is actually one of the few composers whose intentions and beliefs regarding proper performance are clear and anything but frivolous: he is known for having made numerous corrections of his own scores _specifically_ involving ornamentation. Do not allow yourself to fall victim to the generalizations of 'proper' Baroque performance which are put forth by so many music scholars and applied to Bach; they don't.
How come you don't like it at all? You said he "does more compliment to the work than merely showing off his ability". Doesn't that mean he's making the work sound nice rather than trying to show off? Correct me if I'm wrong.
I was comparing Koopman with someone else--Kipnis--who is known for lavish embellishment, but who, in my opinion, does so with less vanity and better supplements the music (despite his ability, in cases where there seems no room for embellishments he actually concedes to the work whereas Koopman defiantly inserts them whenever possible to the point absurdity).
alexred1, estoy totalmente de acuerdo con Vd, en toda su apreciación. Tengo un Cd de este mismo intérprete y deja mucho que desear. Esta pieza está excesivamente adornada y en un tempo inadecuado.
@mxtiplitz esa es una gran verdad: el "bouquet" del libro de Anna Magdalena Bach es precisamente la calidad de sus adornos, ni pocos ni muchos, sólo los justos. Eso es lo que convirtió a ese libro en una pieza deliciosa para tocar en cualquier ocasión: conseguí en Internet un facsímil del original y es realmente maravillosa (sólo poseía unas doce piezas nomás para tocar). Es realmente una pena que algunos intérpretes le agreguen cosas que no fueron puestas en los originales: sólo lo tapan.
@mxtiplitz Yo soy un gran amante de la musica de Bach y te dire que siempre me gustaran mas las versiones originales pero tambien me gusta escuchar variaciones de estas. La musica no tiene por que ser cuadrada. Saludos!!!
@DarkLoveFashion Con todos los respetos, esto no es una variación ni estamos hablando de que la música no tenga por qué tener ciertos grados de interpretación. Estamos hablando de un minuet de Bach excesivamente adornada y tocada en tempo desastrosamente rápida. Si a Vd. le agrada le felicito, pero si se quiere presentar como una buena interpretación, le recomendaría que estudiara un poco historia de la música, dicho esto sin rencor ni menosprecio por mi parte hacia Vd. Humildemente.
@mxtiplitz Excuse me but if u are an expert of theory of music you should ineeed know that baroque music is often enriched with trills and scales. And no..it's not too fast; take a metronome and measure the beats..it perfectly fits.
@borghese84 I know very well Sir.Koopman. In fact, I know him since I bought an HORRIBLE cd from he. and yes, I have some idea of the history of music and its environment, so I'll tell you more, the licenses that allowed Mr. Koopman harpsichord are unforgivable, but as a wise man would say pianist often, if not always, you find a good piano player from a bad one in the early stages of a simple work
@6cuerdas6 Opino con mejor criterio del que creés tener: hace años que toco clavicordio y piano, y jamás tocaría esta pieza a la velocidad que lo hace este individuo. En los facsímiles que se consiguen de Bach (sí, esta obra se consigue en facsímil del original) se ve claramente la velocidad a la que debe ejecutarse esta pieza que no se parece en nada a la "carrera" que se muestra acá.
Y si te molesta mi opinión, lo siento mucho: no soy culpable de tu necedad.
Quiero hacer una pregunta: ¿Por qué lo toca TAN rápido, si esa no es la velocidad que corresponde? Así suena deslucido, molesto, hasta bruto: da la impresión que lo toca así de rápido para sacárselo de encima.
Si alguien me lo quiere explicar, por favor, soy todo oidos: no entiendo esta clase de cosas y las considero una ofensa hacia su creador.
Fantastic!
Tenifus 6 days ago
This tempo is actually more likely how a minuet would have been played back then. From six different French pendulum markings from the first half of the 18th century, we find minuets being played from quarter = 126 - 231 with an average of about 190 bpm. You can read about this "Interpreting Pendulum Markings for French Baroque Dances" by Harris-Warrick. Quantz in 1752 gave the minuet quarter = 160.
sheridanhaskell 1 week ago
Holy Trills Batman! Awesome!
rlondon777 2 months ago
G major! haha this was the first bach Ive even learned, Im now working a Back little fuge in g, Its awsome!
itscodyw 2 months ago
haha yeah as the others said gmajor.... i played this a few years ago on violin :D
ArchangelusMortis 5 months ago in playlist At home with Bach (Klaus Mertens & Ton Koopman)
MAJOR!
Ratje1a 5 months ago
g major!!!
micangess 6 months ago
very fast
he214abc 6 months ago
12 people... dont like bach, old men or harpsichords. fair enough.
great vid.
larsgathe 7 months ago
Yup.... G MAJOR...really should change it. It is very misleading. Thanks.
redbrian3655 8 months ago
yes, you really should change the title to G Major
TheLivingHeiromartyr 9 months ago
you rock harpsicord dude!!!
Sh2theB 10 months ago
Why does it say G minor?
colourfulwithaU 11 months ago
haha Ton Koopman you play this most brilliant !
Darkboy2525 1 year ago
Oh I love this piece, and Ton Kooman is just amazing. And I actually like the ornamentations very much. That's real technique and creativity.
VONHIMMELBACH 1 year ago 3
G major, not minor!
marquischadier 1 year ago 43
Great sounding harpsichord
GodDamnlt 1 year ago
Comment removed
europeanguy3 1 year ago
too fast!!!! and is G major
damiancho15 1 year ago
@damiancho15 I don't agree. It sounds very naturaly. You only have to feel the pulse of the whole bar instead of every single quarter note.
It's indeed in G major.
Wienermitan 1 year ago
isnt that in g major?
jasonman071 1 year ago 2
erm, how your fingers ever move so fast? Anyway, its a really interesting change though. :)
feli1097 1 year ago
Mr. Koopman, IMHO, is one of the best harpsichordists ever!!!!! Acknowledging that the trills may be excessive to some, it's still true he possesses fantastic technique which enables him to play at lightning speeds (with trills). :0
bhinderbinder 1 year ago
my favorite version of this peice on youtube..all the others play it slow and stumble along..and i love the sound of a harpsichord
cwecub 1 year ago
Isn't it i G Major?
Hyrulean112 1 year ago
@Hyrulean112 Yes, the first part is in G Major, the Fugue switches to E Minor, then goes back to G Major when it repeats the theme. This has too many embellishments and improvisations for my taste, but to each his own.
dropoutextreme 1 year ago
@dropoutextreme there is no fugue...
jmarkha5 1 year ago
@jmarkha5 if you say so.
dropoutextreme 1 year ago
@dropoutextreme yes, possitive. 1. It's a minuet 2. it doesn't show even one part of a fugue. Just so you know. Maybe look up what exactly qualifies a fugue...
jmarkha5 1 year ago
WTF MAN this is so weird
SonicDreamcaster 1 year ago
fuckin' beutiful
Orchidbeautyful 2 years ago
I love how he is tilting his head like that
sirrington 2 years ago
nice triplets!
LePoteAmarcel 2 years ago
this guy showes with his skills that he really has the baroque technique ! well done !
rosangel123qw 2 years ago
bloody brillian. i am trying to lear that. good on you :)
Alexmango2k7 2 years ago
the player is pretty good but there are too much ornamentation for my taste
rodrigocientista 2 years ago
rock it baby!
LePoteAmarcel 2 years ago
this is menuet in G major... not minor...
dapna 2 years ago 2
no is minor. the major begins with re sol la si do re sol sol
whatdidyousaynigga 2 years ago
I like it =D
bachlifly 2 years ago
I don't like it at all; most unpleasantly ornamented and improvised--Kipnis does much better and with more compliment to the work than the mere showing off of his own technical ability.
dolofonos 2 years ago
During the baroque period it was normal to add ornaments when the theme was repeated. Today there's a wrong way to think at Bach's works as stark and severe.
sousukesagaraJKD 2 years ago 3
_Bach_ is actually one of the few composers whose intentions and beliefs regarding proper performance are clear and anything but frivolous: he is known for having made numerous corrections of his own scores _specifically_ involving ornamentation. Do not allow yourself to fall victim to the generalizations of 'proper' Baroque performance which are put forth by so many music scholars and applied to Bach; they don't.
dolofonos 2 years ago
Did you read C.P.E. Bach's "Method of Playing the Clavier"? There are J.S. Bach's thoughts (reported by his son) about ornamentation.
sousukesagaraJKD 2 years ago
How come you don't like it at all? You said he "does more compliment to the work than merely showing off his ability". Doesn't that mean he's making the work sound nice rather than trying to show off? Correct me if I'm wrong.
Zaphenath4 2 years ago
I was comparing Koopman with someone else--Kipnis--who is known for lavish embellishment, but who, in my opinion, does so with less vanity and better supplements the music (despite his ability, in cases where there seems no room for embellishments he actually concedes to the work whereas Koopman defiantly inserts them whenever possible to the point absurdity).
dolofonos 2 years ago
Oh I see. So basically, you're saying Koopman is overdoing it?
Zaphenath4 2 years ago
Precisely.
dolofonos 2 years ago
alexred1, estoy totalmente de acuerdo con Vd, en toda su apreciación. Tengo un Cd de este mismo intérprete y deja mucho que desear. Esta pieza está excesivamente adornada y en un tempo inadecuado.
mxtiplitz 2 years ago 3
@mxtiplitz esa es una gran verdad: el "bouquet" del libro de Anna Magdalena Bach es precisamente la calidad de sus adornos, ni pocos ni muchos, sólo los justos. Eso es lo que convirtió a ese libro en una pieza deliciosa para tocar en cualquier ocasión: conseguí en Internet un facsímil del original y es realmente maravillosa (sólo poseía unas doce piezas nomás para tocar). Es realmente una pena que algunos intérpretes le agreguen cosas que no fueron puestas en los originales: sólo lo tapan.
alexred1 1 year ago
@mxtiplitz Yo soy un gran amante de la musica de Bach y te dire que siempre me gustaran mas las versiones originales pero tambien me gusta escuchar variaciones de estas. La musica no tiene por que ser cuadrada. Saludos!!!
DarkLoveFashion 1 year ago
@DarkLoveFashion Con todos los respetos, esto no es una variación ni estamos hablando de que la música no tenga por qué tener ciertos grados de interpretación. Estamos hablando de un minuet de Bach excesivamente adornada y tocada en tempo desastrosamente rápida. Si a Vd. le agrada le felicito, pero si se quiere presentar como una buena interpretación, le recomendaría que estudiara un poco historia de la música, dicho esto sin rencor ni menosprecio por mi parte hacia Vd. Humildemente.
mxtiplitz 1 year ago
@mxtiplitz Excuse me but if u are an expert of theory of music you should ineeed know that baroque music is often enriched with trills and scales. And no..it's not too fast; take a metronome and measure the beats..it perfectly fits.
borghese84 1 year ago 2
@borghese84 I know very well Sir.Koopman. In fact, I know him since I bought an HORRIBLE cd from he. and yes, I have some idea of the history of music and its environment, so I'll tell you more, the licenses that allowed Mr. Koopman harpsichord are unforgivable, but as a wise man would say pianist often, if not always, you find a good piano player from a bad one in the early stages of a simple work
mxtiplitz 1 year ago
this is not gminor...this is major
Swimmy93 2 years ago 2
A sweet-sounding tone refreshes sad hearts.
VittorioDDV 2 years ago
Cuidado con los argentinos como alexred1 opinan sin saber nada, por favor criticar a un Maestro de esta calidad.
Gracias
6cuerdas6 2 years ago
@6cuerdas6 Opino con mejor criterio del que creés tener: hace años que toco clavicordio y piano, y jamás tocaría esta pieza a la velocidad que lo hace este individuo. En los facsímiles que se consiguen de Bach (sí, esta obra se consigue en facsímil del original) se ve claramente la velocidad a la que debe ejecutarse esta pieza que no se parece en nada a la "carrera" que se muestra acá.
Y si te molesta mi opinión, lo siento mucho: no soy culpable de tu necedad.
alexred1 1 year ago
@6cuerdas6 Si tu oído está estropeado, andá al médico, SORDO!!
alexred1 1 year ago
@alexred1 Te parece que no se puede tener criterios diferentes en musica?
Tu primero cuida las palabras a emplear y despues piensa, medita y tal vez entiendas.
Saludos hombre del oido perfecto!!
6cuerdas6 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I love that elegant piano.
musicxg 2 years ago
That would be a harpsichord my friend.
zynko1234 2 years ago 6
Otro video igual al anterior...
Quiero hacer una pregunta: ¿Por qué lo toca TAN rápido, si esa no es la velocidad que corresponde? Así suena deslucido, molesto, hasta bruto: da la impresión que lo toca así de rápido para sacárselo de encima.
Si alguien me lo quiere explicar, por favor, soy todo oidos: no entiendo esta clase de cosas y las considero una ofensa hacia su creador.
alexred1 2 years ago
Excellent.! We can see how an easy piece like this can be played in a professional manner...
kefaad 3 years ago
Where is this being performed, i.e. in which hall?
bigbono12 3 years ago
Gohliser Schlösschen, Leipzig, January 2000
SoliDeoGloria8550 3 years ago
6 und 8 von Jan.
WolfgangSebastien 3 years ago