Feb 19 2012 the water breaks, the balances will be adjusted from 20-21, the 22nd the judgment is made Alpha the begining my love in the beginning will sit on the right side of the scale, Omega the end love under will which has caused me so much pain on the left side of the scale. Omega will end it with the sagrado corazon, to restore Alpha to the heart in the beginning.
@CGimaging How does the vesica piscis relate to the tube torus? Do you have any suggestions regarding processes of feedback and sacred geometry? Uroborus?
I was good with Trigonometry, but not very creative with algabreic functions, would you happen to know why? I was assuming it was because "modern" math is flawed.
@melovinci Thomas Campbell, author of My BIG Toe offers the theory of the Digital Big Bang. thank you i did like this class however i didnt agree with alot of what would be called reality.. i watched it thinking it was a real theory of everything will have to watch it again,
i base my entire philosophy upon the duality of positive and negotive that create the trinity of onness i feel to be real,.after viewing your videos i began looking back at my art to see the vesica pices time and time again....awesome feeling to see things we create with a deeper sence of understanding......i get goose bumps watching your videos....thanks!
if you have a chance you should check out my short vid. yutube.com/watch?v=_w883aiqKHw which is a 3 minute video i made showing how sacred geometry is the backbone to almost all of our historic, present and way ancient religious and everyday symbols.
the duality is learning and the one is the ultimate solution to matters ,but no beginning just a loop to the past the present and the future at the same time ,its a rebirth every times ,at his image ,you can see
Respect. Charles, will you please do something on fractal generation. Is 137.5 degrees always the generator, or does it vary from set to set? Maybe you have but I have not seen it; very interested.
I don't know if you will ever read this (Charles) but I need to at least put in writing that I love watching these videos because not many teachers are as enthusiastic and passionate about their subject of choice and watching you is almost infectious or habit forming from your passion. And I too wanted to learn about SG for reasons that I just can't explain, your drawn to it. So thank you and keep it up. Many times thank you. Q? do you think we negate the life force as a fundamental force?
I've been listening to George Kavassilas raving on about the Vesica Pisces and so I did a search. Back in sacred geometry land where I always end up and here is the best explanations. Loved learning how this is even more fundamental than Metatrons cube. Big heart from Bangkok Charles :)
@SlipAllCityToy What does that mean...u know and salty or ur saying no we don't......bc if ur saying no Ill personally show u WE DO...doesn't matter where u are:
If you want to learn more about sacred geometry and the flower of life, this video is part of the series Spirit Science, check it out! it might paint this in a more complete picture watch?v=I7GJ-8SY068
The Bible was written in symbols and parables 2000+ years ago so that simple people with simple language could get it. We are not those people any longer, and we need to look deeper.
@Laxmijoy what are you looking for? the bible helped me find what i was looking for. so did several other tools of learning. perhaps the depth you seek can be found underneath your nose. i've found amazing formulas in several holy books. the bible has a very significant role in the universe. don't discredit it.
I dont know if you are familiar with the Geroge´s Kavassilas "Harmonic Ecuation of Ascention" Im sure you will love it, if you dont know it, is in George´s web site, you can google him to see it, blessings my friend
We're only looking at 2d point of view. Rhodin math also claims to have key to the universe, so which is it? both ? neither? one? what if you run a fractal radius and likewise a fractal radial degree for more or less spheres of a different matrix? aha
One problem, No big bang, it is a two-way motion universe. Twin Opposing votices per Viktor Schauberger and Walter Russell. As Above, so below. We live in an Electric Sacred Geometric Universe. Look into the Space Geometry of Russelian Science. "The Secret Of Light" Walter Russell
I wish my teachers in school had half of your inspiration--better late then never :) Thank you for sharing your passion. I am absorbing it down to my core.
you have a very nice video about flower of life, vesica piscis and sacred geometry.
Of course i want to give you a very new and exciting tipp about absolutely unknown and very old Light -knowledge about Sacred Geometry, Flower of Life and Holy Grail.
Please take an intensive look to the german book with the title: Gralsstein der Stein der Weisen.
There you can find the very best, and easy explain, about Sacred Geometry!
all his premises are built on mud. "the universe was created'(by division)". 'Duality' as opposed to multiplicity. "The Vesica Piscis is literally the womb of the universe"and he's "not kidding". you say it sounds crazy, well we have a word for that kind of crazy in English, its called DOGMA. Im not religious but Matthew 7:12, just from a philosophical point of view, is infinitely more sacred than any geometry. And by the way, there is no going to infinity(and coming back); its not an end point.
why is the idea of the universe never being created so unpopular?. Beginnings and endings/life-death might only be illusions. To me, it seems infinitely more logical that the universe never began and will never end; always was, always will be. 'IF' the 'big bang' even happened, it would be more accurately titled 'The microscopic bang' in comparison to the universe. Steve Hawkings is the equivalent of fecal matter flushing down the toilette, viewing the swirl, then judging the whole universe.
can this bullshit bring you eternal life after death on earth?? can it feed and teach poor countries?? dose it have any thing to do with building honesty and love in the hearts of mankind. Thats wat im talking about you bitch !!! do you hear me!
Does math make the world or does the world make the math? Can there be an intelligent society out there that has come to a math system that is completely different from ours but still works? Since we use a system that mostly works (There are flaws) why try to find a new system since the one we have took thousands of years to develop? We speak of Motzart as creating music but science discovering a concept. Libeniz system is more accurate and easier so why do we use Newtonian calcus?
Notice how the author of the video doesn't back up any of his claims, but instead chooses to pile more claims on his other claims.
Even videos talking about General Relativity from a highly simplified viewpoint back up their claims by mentioning invariance as being the cause for derivation.
This idea doesn't even hint at any intelligent derivation; so where's its justification for being believed?
vesica pisces is the starting point for life....just like a vagina...which must be passed through for your start!!! And we already know what shape it is as well!!!
Vesica n; "a membranous sac containing gas or liquid." In other words, an EGG! The Fish's EGG! How many times must we look to see God and Science as THE SAME THING??
You cannot understand sacred geometry through a left brain perspective alone.You need both left and right brains to work in unison in order to comprehend the vesica piscis.
For a musician who really doesn't like "math" lol, this was an excellent intro to the Vesica Piscis! I've always had a thing for Penrose Triangles, what would the relationship be here...
@TwistedLemniscate I understand haters gonna hate, but if you don't like it, just move on. If you like Sacred Geometry, you'll find other's comments to be more support for the idea, and if you don't, you'll think they're silly. No need to bash, no need to get hot under the collar, no need to troll. Just go.
But I'm not bashing for a silly reason like a distaste in someone's music, this bashing is not arbitrary, not based on opinion.
This video is promoting falsehoods, and arrives at conclusions that people who actually study the universe (physicits, cosmologists, astronomers, etc.) don't. This Platonism crap has hardly been popular for 2,000 years, and it's on the same level of sillyness as the Geocentric Theory of our solar system.
I'm commenting because whenever people are given an clearcut explanation of what the universe "is" it impedes on their potential for further investigation.
If you're told that A is the truth, then you'll probably think there's no need to investigate further, and then you may never come to realize that it was really B that was the answer. For never investigating on A's validity, you incorrectly presumed, was unnecessary.
If only you'd taken A as tentative from the start.
@TwistedLemniscate That's true, but once someone's bought into a belief, you cannot dissuade them. They have to realize it for themselves. Otherwise they'll brand you as a liar, or a troll, or an "infidel". Just let it go.
You're correct that I'm not a puppetmaster holding any strings. But the internet, more or less, can only take you places that you wish to go, and many people are spending their time reassuring themselves of things that they already believe.
To observe that there are people who aren't ignorant of these things, and yet arrive at different conclusions might just be the catalyst for them to try and think of these things for themselves.
@TwistedLemniscate Again, you make a good point. But when you start blatantly dissing someone's beliefs, you just look like an asshole, not a valid, well reasoned alternate opinion.
Yeah, but the comment I left before we started our whole conversation was a mathematical proof (syllogistic) that Platonism is self-defeating. Is formulating a mathematical argument not well reasoned?
Galileo would continuously mock other professors about their Aristotlean conception of gravity, and eventually gathered a crowd to watch him drop two varied weighted objects that fell simultaneously. His whole experiment made him to appear as an asshole, but is that why he did it?
@TwistedLemniscate Galileo provided irrefutable proof for his theories on gravity. Logic, as wonderful as it is, is not irrefutable. Zeno's paradoxes are a fine example, for instance, how he used (mathematically correct) logic to prove motion is impossible, although we know it to be possible.
No, Galileo didn't, science doesn't deal with "irrefuatble" anything, only falsifiables.
Zeno's paradoxes did use correct mathematics, though not applied correctly. Achilles-Turtle paradox describes the zooming in on a particular event (Achillies' gaining lead), and not the outcome of the race; Achilles applied the mathematics incorrectly. Similarly, the walking-towards-a-wall paradox (or whatever it's called) describes the zooming in on a particular event too (walking to wall).
@TwistedLemniscate The entire point of Zeno's paradoxes is that the process of logic can have absurd outcomes. Of course you'll walk to a wall and reach it, though logically you shouldn't be able to cross an infinite amount of points, etc. The process by which you reach the wall is supposedly impossible, therefore, the outcome either doesn't matter because you never reach it or is inconsistent with logic. Furthermore, math is often applied in the physical world, such as astrophysics.
The Zeno paradoxes came before the calculus, and therefore ideas such as continuity weren't as strongly understood. Once calculus was understood it became clearly obvious that if we were to correctly apply the math, then Zeno's interpretations of motion were false.
Meaning Zeno's application of the math lead to an impossibility because of his own flaw in applying it, and not an inherent one in the math.
@TwistedLemniscate You're missing the point. It's not the math that matters, it's the misapplication of logic. And who's to say you're not misapplying your logic and/or math in the disproving of this video's theories?
Missing the point? "It's not the math that matters, it's the misapplication of logic;" that's what I've been trying to tell you. We apparently had the same point.
Perhaps I did misapply, but really my real point is something similar to what Kant would say: What's more likely, that the real world adheres itself to mathematics or that mathematics adheres itself to the real world? The latter assertion is clearly the winner, and as a corollary there's nothing sacred about math.
@TwistedLemniscate Your entire argument is centered around Zeno's bad math, and not that his logic shows how logic can be wrong, as yours is most likely. As for the relation between reality and mathematics, just because math isn't the focal point does not mean that it's unimportant. It defines and conceptualizes reality into meaningful patterns, something most people have difficulty expressing.
No, my argument regarding ZP is about misapplication. You can read about his misapplication in the first chapter of many elementary calculus textbooks.
You're only Strawman arguing now. I never said that math is "unimportant," I'm a math enthusiast, and beginning my way to becoming a mathematician (I'm studying advanced calculus and point-set topology atm).
I used "sacred" as a religious religious word to portray that I don't believe math should be combined with religion.
@TwistedLemniscate And now we come back to the original argument: belief. You don't believe that math should be religious, for legitimate reasons, at least to you. And in my playing devil's advocate, I have provided reasons that are legitimate enough for someone who chooses to believe in Sacred Geometry. It's all about personal choice, and whether someone wants to pray to the Vesica Piscis or Jehova or Allah or a jug of Milk, that's their right, and you can't convince them they're wrong.
Obviously the two different beliefs are not the same; I hope you can see the difference between sacred worship and an opinion.
"I have provided reasons that are legitimate enough for..."
So far all of your comments have consisted of you either (1) saying I might be viewed as a troll, asshole, etc., (2) you agreeing with me, (3) using a fallacious interpretation of Zeno's Paradox, (4) or simply saying one can't convince another or [blah]. You'ven't provided a single reason.
@TwistedLemniscate You said yourself that science doesn't deal with what can be proven, but what can disproven. My reasons may not be straightforward, but by refuting your arguments, I have proof enough for someone who already wants to believe in my argument. If you or someone else doesn't believe this, then my refutations mean nothing to you.
"You said yourself that science doesn't deal with what can be proven, but what can [be] disproven."
No, whatever I said would be more along the lines of: "Things that don't lend themselves to any sort of test that'll show them to be false are unknowable and therefore beyond the capabilities of empirical analysis."
It's not about the capability of "disproof," but the capability of creating tests that could "disprove." Subtle, but VERY different.
@TwistedLemniscate You're dodging the argument I'm making, and it's that my argument lends credence to someone who ALREADY IS WILLING TO BELIEVE IN THIS. It doesn't matter whether I used fallacies or you're just too stupid or self-righteous to see that I'm right. The end result is that if someone takes my side, they take my side and take my arguments for canon, and think you're a pompous ass. If someone refutes me, then they'll think I'm an idiot cultist or whatever.
I may be wrong, but I believe I've confronted every argument you've made.
"It doesn't matter whether I used fallacies"
So having an inability to support yourself on nonflawed arguments doesn't matter? It's typically a good indicator that you're incorrect.
Perhaps you've misunderstood my intentions. I'm currently arguing for the sake of enjoyment, and not to influence readers. Who the hell would be interested in this argument?
@TwistedLemniscate I'd imagine everyone reading the comments, Twisted. Why else would they even read this? Not only have you avoided the argument of confirmation bias, but you're also taking quotes out of context when it should be read as, in Layman's terms "Either I'm wrong, or you're too biased to see I'm right."
And math doesn't "prove" anything related to the physical world. You could axiomatize aspects of the real world, but then the axioms would be math and not the physical world.
My thought was that if people believed in Platonism, then they'd surely believe a proof that proved it incorrect. Basically, if Platonism it true then Platonism is false.
And yeah, I'm aware that I'm using math in a Platonistic sort of way to combat Platonism.
@TwistedLemniscate. Take a look at "Randy Powell Intro To Vortex Math" (an extension on Marko Rodins work) This is the first time I've looked at sacred geometry and so far only this video but already noticed some correlations.
My insights pertain to psychology and point to a doubling of opportunities when a choice is made in accordance with the principle of allowance(as opposed to injunction which limits them).
Probability thus ensuring perpetual expansion of consciousness + the universe.
Do you have a book out there that I can get my hands on?
The videos really help, probably better than a book- but I cant take the internet with me, and I feel like this is a SERIOUSLY important thing for me to understand. :) Thanks for teaching.
I know nothing about this but all I know is Rainbow dome music by Hillage for my brain is on the same wave length...I will however keep this very much in my mind..As I love to feel spirit...
Namaste, Delagrazia, All. What I am referring to is the creation of Free Will, which did not exist in the earliest Cosmos. The difference is that a veil was inserted, which was done “by Lucifer", who had the knowledge of how God created the universe, and long long ago. Thus, there are two ubiquitous geometries, simultaneous; and Lucifer's is identical in all ways and appearances to the first -- except one. One: an utterly vital fact, which now required 4 steps.
Its center is this so profoundly deep. So cleverly hidden. A thousand times it passes without notice. Its purpose that. And yet still, discovering it is there, one is made to remove obstacles. In time existed a ransom now.
Luciferian Geometry, which is the cause of Free Will, has this core quality of opposition, not conjunction. Difference, not of sameness. It means to conceal, hide, confuse and retard -- in an infinite amount of ways -- the Light, the Love. This is shown geometrically. Seek and you shall find. The key is in your hand.
love the videos, thanks so much for making these. what if, instead of naturally letting these circles divide themselves by their radius, forming hexagonal patterns, you divided them by phi, and instead got pentagonal patterns? this idea has been reoccurring in my work for decades:D
3:40 This is Luciferian geometry. Those four circles are the means by which one LOSES the connection to Christ, the first over-arching circle in the Flower of Life. Nor did God create duality. I don't like your teachings.
:"Those four circles are the means by which one LOSES .. Fwer of Life."what do u mean?how one looses connection?/i know nothing about these thinks+i may beparallel here but right at the beggining when i saw the2circles in my mind came man/woman and evolution/a higher state when these2unite/alchemy-union(sex) >evolution through unity and the birth of their spiritual child/or man-woman birth of real baby/duality-trinity
"On a recent road trip to Dahlonega Georgia...while riding as a passenger...reclining in my seat with eyes closed...a download of Sacred Geometrics occurred translated through the shadows of the tree tops through Our Sacred Sun. It was a Phenomenal Kaleidescope of vibrant colors all rotating clockwise & then counter-clockwise in a Rainbow Vibration. The Infinite Rocks!
Love Always & Forever,
L.A.A.F.
Pat Timmermans...Purveyor of "Endless Possibilities!"
this is kind of the 1st time i herd of this Vesica Piscis. . . . i know its important. but so far noting is making sence. . . on to the next webpage about it so i can find out more. good video :)
"Standing in the Center of the Vesica Piscis...Am a Receptor...an Antennae for the Infinite Vibration...Carrying the Resurrection Energy...BEING the Cohesive Energy of Pure Love...the "GLUE" that holds Space...Am a Messenger of the Christ Seed...in Deepest Gratitude in Loving Service to the Almighty Mother-Father God...The Almighty Absolute..."
Love Always & Forever,
L.A.A.F.
Pat Timmermans...Purveyor of "Endless Possibilities!"
"Standing in the Center of the Vesica Piscis...Am a Receptor...an Antennae for the Infinite Vibration...Carrying the Resurrection Energy...BEING the Cohesive Energy of PURE LOVE...the "GLUE" that holds Space...Am a Messenger of the Christ-Seed...in Deepest Gratitude in Loving Service to The Almighy Mother-Father God...The Almighty Absolute..."
Love Always & Forever,
L.A.A.F.
Pat Timmermans...Purveyor of "Endless Possibilities!"
EYE OF HORUS - What the Chiristians are now calling the Eye Of Satan; the Evil Eye; One Eyed Devil. Especially when the iluminati had perverted the spiritualism behind this symbol shown as in the cap-stone of the pyramid on the dollar bill. The Ancient Kemetians knew the Vesica Piscis concept in which the single eye meant 'consciousness, or 'being-awake'-spiritually.
I like your passion here. I think that this form is a reflection of the essence, which I think you also understand to be true. The form of the essence is quite important, of course, and is the "word" so to speak. But the speaker's spirit, the REAL essence, is definitely not this mere form. This is mainly for anyone who doesn't already know this and might assume Gilchrist thinks reality IS that shape there. It's not. That's a formal expression. The essence is a content, a qualia.
It is sad to see what people come up with in their search for truth and meaning and order. Just look to Jesus. Simple, easy. God created you, He created the universe, he created your mind, and gave you ability to think and reason. Don't look to geometry for answers. JESUS is the answer.
@theninja001 "It is sad to see what people come up with in their search for truth and meaning and order"- Like talking snakes and jesus. At least there's evidence for geometry
How about packaging it, via a distribution network (like Blip tv or TubeMogul) into an enrichment "class" for home schoolers? Then you could just follow your bliss, as you do so well, and not be concerned with curriculum, etc.
What in quantum physics makes this clear as day?? Could you point me in the right direction? Always been very interested in the golden ratio and sacred geometry. Is it true that the periodic table is made up the 5 perfect solids???
Must be easy to make a buck in the US... whip together some hoccus easy to understand hogwash... get a guy with whitened hair, a beard and which knows when to smirk at the right time, and whalla - best seller (The Secret).
After i told someone of one of my future dreams, i realized that they unknowingly changed the outcome, so the butterfly effect seems to be an evident theory. All can be changed & it is potential of multiple realities being played out. We can only take THIS observation in for the most part, but anything can be accessed via subconscious. You can access intent through clearing the screen(blackscreen) & consciously pulling up information from past/present/future & travel anywhere.
The Kundalini awakening speaks of the 2 paths. I have had heavy precognition from birth. I had one that i didnt like, so the next night, i yelled out. My subconscious self appeared in front of me. i said i want this to change, i dont want my life to go this way. My other self sais, ok. He/me puts his hand out to shake & he dissolves into me. I immediately started recieving the same signal, but i make a stand in the end. 2 days later, the new dream happens & it changes me & the people involved.
I dont mean to toot my own horn, but Pisces are the beginning & end. A 4 year alignment of the electromagnetic field of the Earth on or around Leap Year. Pisces are duality of the conscious/subconscious. The dreammasters & the most profoundly psychic. Posiedon(Psi) Protected by Sirius. Some believe we were born immortal. We awake in deep Delta & control the blackscreen. We are asleep & awake. Pisces Power!!!
question: Is a ray of light compose of sacred geometry also? Or what is it that we see? And if the universe is holographic then why is sacred geometry structured so it can withstand a push (if you will.)
Feb 19 2012 the water breaks, the balances will be adjusted from 20-21, the 22nd the judgment is made Alpha the begining my love in the beginning will sit on the right side of the scale, Omega the end love under will which has caused me so much pain on the left side of the scale. Omega will end it with the sagrado corazon, to restore Alpha to the heart in the beginning.
daggertoungeomega 2 days ago
i mentioned some sites before check them out frequently there is good inof there also check starknowledge net
daggertoungeomega 2 days ago
Sacred Geometry 101B: The Vesica Piscis
daggertoungeomega 2 days ago
that was mind blowing
andy22vd 1 week ago
This is ridiculous. Drawing shapes inside another shape and declaring that the universe LITERALLY has a womb doesn't impress me much.
CDEggebrecht 3 weeks ago
would division make a bang and why do they say big if what happened was on the scale of atomic.
nettledned 3 weeks ago
at the end...that's what I'm talking about lol.
petefaders 3 weeks ago
i learned more about math in that video than i did in 12 years of school.
335281 4 weeks ago
@CGimaging How does the vesica piscis relate to the tube torus? Do you have any suggestions regarding processes of feedback and sacred geometry? Uroborus?
summondadrummin 1 month ago
I was good with Trigonometry, but not very creative with algabreic functions, would you happen to know why? I was assuming it was because "modern" math is flawed.
pmuttenthaler 1 month ago
The eye on the dollar bill
1Rizzay 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@melovinci Thomas Campbell, author of My BIG Toe offers the theory of the Digital Big Bang. thank you i did like this class however i didnt agree with alot of what would be called reality.. i watched it thinking it was a real theory of everything will have to watch it again,
discterb 1 month ago
Mr. Gilchrist I just want you to receive a huge THANK YOU...for your explanetions, for your simple way, for being...thank u thank u thank u
robertawatsu 1 month ago in playlist Altri video di CGimaging
Wonderful ! Thanks. As a midwife I see it as the shape all humans are born through.
CrystalSedona 1 month ago
"The light of the body is the eye: if therefore your eye be single, your whole body shall be full of light." Jesus in matthew ch 6 v 22
ionvkch 1 month ago
the concept is true, but this video presents it in a poor way.
cyroxos 1 month ago
@cyroxos you should make a video and cover all the angles, no pun intended
ionvkch 1 month ago
uauuuuuuuuuuuu
This is cool!!!
TheGlowingBee22 2 months ago
Wonderful knowledge to share!
I love your videos! Keep on pls :)
ralovesuk 3 months ago in playlist More videos from CGimaging
i base my entire philosophy upon the duality of positive and negotive that create the trinity of onness i feel to be real,.after viewing your videos i began looking back at my art to see the vesica pices time and time again....awesome feeling to see things we create with a deeper sence of understanding......i get goose bumps watching your videos....thanks!
roedogape 3 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
if you have a chance you should check out my short vid. yutube.com/watch?v=_w883aiqKHw which is a 3 minute video i made showing how sacred geometry is the backbone to almost all of our historic, present and way ancient religious and everyday symbols.
sunnyXsideXcyanide 4 months ago
the duality is learning and the one is the ultimate solution to matters ,but no beginning just a loop to the past the present and the future at the same time ,its a rebirth every times ,at his image ,you can see
7878toastmaster 4 months ago
Supremo. Genial. Maravillosamente explicado.
Superb! Brilliant! marvellously explained!
alnetworks2010 4 months ago
Respect. Charles, will you please do something on fractal generation. Is 137.5 degrees always the generator, or does it vary from set to set? Maybe you have but I have not seen it; very interested.
kepler5813 4 months ago
5:30 fractals, no?
MrSaint3 5 months ago
I don't know if you will ever read this (Charles) but I need to at least put in writing that I love watching these videos because not many teachers are as enthusiastic and passionate about their subject of choice and watching you is almost infectious or habit forming from your passion. And I too wanted to learn about SG for reasons that I just can't explain, your drawn to it. So thank you and keep it up. Many times thank you. Q? do you think we negate the life force as a fundamental force?
nrgjunky1 5 months ago
I love this Thank You
LordLarsaSolidor 6 months ago
I've been listening to George Kavassilas raving on about the Vesica Pisces and so I did a search. Back in sacred geometry land where I always end up and here is the best explanations. Loved learning how this is even more fundamental than Metatrons cube. Big heart from Bangkok Charles :)
charlesfrith 6 months ago
wow eye opener O.O i finally found a bit of explanation to something I've been wanting to understand
animeworldchick 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Harold Camping was RIGHT about May 21, click on my channel to see...
youneekk 6 months ago
the fish!! it all makes sense now in a way. vesca piscis.
Wolfsbane909 6 months ago
Women rule the world and universe :>
onlyonesuperdiva 6 months ago
@onlyonesuperdiva
...shit
SlipAllCityToy 6 months ago
@SlipAllCityToy What does that mean...u know and salty or ur saying no we don't......bc if ur saying no Ill personally show u WE DO...doesn't matter where u are:
onlyonesuperdiva 5 months ago
You sound like a Bauhaus scholar. :)
digitalbeat666 6 months ago
gerd zeigler and gila zur....look up these 2 mystics.....the wheels of life and mirror of the soul
daelohmen 7 months ago
gerd zeigler and gila zur....look up these 2 mystics
daelohmen 7 months ago
I know very well about the flower in it.
That flower is not just a simply flower. It is the flower of life.
qqoify 7 months ago
THIS MUST BE WHY FOOTBALL IS THE GREATEST SPORT IN THE UNIVERSE !!!! GO LIONS!!!
newton3010 7 months ago
@newton3010 am I a pervert or does that look like a Vagina to me?
Wolfsbane909 6 months ago
What a goober.
SebGarth 7 months ago
...that's what i'm talking about CG! : )
AkebulanWarrior 7 months ago
You are Plato reincarnated.
Jianju69 7 months ago
If you want to learn more about sacred geometry and the flower of life, this video is part of the series Spirit Science, check it out! it might paint this in a more complete picture watch?v=I7GJ-8SY068
jordanduchnycz 8 months ago
The Bible was written in symbols and parables 2000+ years ago so that simple people with simple language could get it. We are not those people any longer, and we need to look deeper.
Laxmijoy 8 months ago 11
@Laxmijoy what are you looking for? the bible helped me find what i was looking for. so did several other tools of learning. perhaps the depth you seek can be found underneath your nose. i've found amazing formulas in several holy books. the bible has a very significant role in the universe. don't discredit it.
STORM6490MT 4 months ago
?v=NBEc4qBhDI0&NR=1
STORM6490MT 4 months ago
Brilliant!!!!!!!!!!!!!
nobane 9 months ago
I dont know if you are familiar with the Geroge´s Kavassilas "Harmonic Ecuation of Ascention" Im sure you will love it, if you dont know it, is in George´s web site, you can google him to see it, blessings my friend
KamuiAyami02 9 months ago
I guess the Vesica Piscis is what I'm seeing during my DMT trips.
Sort of like the Alex Grey grids of eyes.
I've always wondered what that pattern was.... this video is a total eye opener for me.
fckths 9 months ago
We're only looking at 2d point of view. Rhodin math also claims to have key to the universe, so which is it? both ? neither? one? what if you run a fractal radius and likewise a fractal radial degree for more or less spheres of a different matrix? aha
mikefromspace 9 months ago
Thank You for the videos.
And thank you for explaining Advaitha philosophy(vedic) in terms of sacred geometry. These concepts were know to indians a very long time ago.
Interestingly the Vesica Piscis is called the womb of the universe, its shaped like an EGG!!!
Namaste! (You and Me are One)
ondway2nirvana 9 months ago
Comment removed
discterb 9 months ago
are there any other options than the big bang theory? Nassim Haramein's theory
seems to have more to offer but it has no relation to religion.
discterb 9 months ago
@discterb
Yes, there are other ways of seeing the root mysteries of the universe other than the Big Bang theory.
And yes, I am a big fan of Nissim Haramein's work.
And finally, I take a spiritual approach to Sacred Geometry, rather than a traditional religious approach.
Love and light,
Charles
CGimaging 9 months ago 7
@discterb Research Terence McKenna and Stanislav Grof.
watch?v=SJQiTsy1fWY&feature=related
The Big Bang may not have been the beginning, but rather may be the ending.
SororThothma 5 months ago
@discterb one of my favorite sites bigbangneverhappened dottt orggg
archaeologicalpark 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@archaeologicalpark thanks for the link will check it out!
discterb 4 months ago
@discterb Thomas Campbell, author of My BIG Toe offers the theory of the Digital Big Bang. Check him online.
melovinci 2 months ago
@discterb oh yes it does , not so much religion but definitely spirituality =)
69Sirdragon 3 weeks ago
One problem, No big bang, it is a two-way motion universe. Twin Opposing votices per Viktor Schauberger and Walter Russell. As Above, so below. We live in an Electric Sacred Geometric Universe. Look into the Space Geometry of Russelian Science. "The Secret Of Light" Walter Russell
77GSlinger 9 months ago
@ He is doing it with passion and that's great!
EnergyOM 10 months ago
so awe inspiring, thank you very much for making these videos.
industrialsparky 10 months ago
Sacred geometry in music - youtube.com/watch?v=nubsDlJvU_o
sladami44 11 months ago
I wish my teachers in school had half of your inspiration--better late then never :) Thank you for sharing your passion. I am absorbing it down to my core.
Shykrill 11 months ago
I really like your videos! Very well done. Elegant. You hqve a great voice and it'v obvious that you're passionate abou the subject. Great job Sir.
rayd888 11 months ago
Hello,
you have a very nice video about flower of life, vesica piscis and sacred geometry.
Of course i want to give you a very new and exciting tipp about absolutely unknown and very old Light -knowledge about Sacred Geometry, Flower of Life and Holy Grail.
Please take an intensive look to the german book with the title: Gralsstein der Stein der Weisen.
There you can find the very best, and easy explain, about Sacred Geometry!
wahremerkaba 11 months ago
The male and female reproductive organ openings are made in this shape because this is where life starts.
papchable 11 months ago
THAT'S WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT!!! RIGHT ON
abelar101 11 months ago
This sounds more like a porno than a science
MatsEP 11 months ago
@MatsEP shut ur nigger hole
ni66erinni6erni6nig 9 months ago
all his premises are built on mud. "the universe was created'(by division)". 'Duality' as opposed to multiplicity. "The Vesica Piscis is literally the womb of the universe"and he's "not kidding". you say it sounds crazy, well we have a word for that kind of crazy in English, its called DOGMA. Im not religious but Matthew 7:12, just from a philosophical point of view, is infinitely more sacred than any geometry. And by the way, there is no going to infinity(and coming back); its not an end point.
supplanter111 1 year ago
@supplanter111 you must be god
JBraun1990 11 months ago
why is the idea of the universe never being created so unpopular?. Beginnings and endings/life-death might only be illusions. To me, it seems infinitely more logical that the universe never began and will never end; always was, always will be. 'IF' the 'big bang' even happened, it would be more accurately titled 'The microscopic bang' in comparison to the universe. Steve Hawkings is the equivalent of fecal matter flushing down the toilette, viewing the swirl, then judging the whole universe.
supplanter111 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
illuminati people plan.
all symbol its about illuminati symbol. fake.......boring!!!
D A J A L EYES
ZyaravZany 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
illuminati people plan.
all symbol its about illuminati symbol. fake.......boring!!!
DAJAL eyes
ZyaravZany 1 year ago
can this bullshit bring you eternal life after death on earth?? can it feed and teach poor countries?? dose it have any thing to do with building honesty and love in the hearts of mankind. Thats wat im talking about you bitch !!! do you hear me!
2011neesh 1 year ago
@2011neesh amen
supplanter111 1 year ago
@2011neesh cau hear what u wrote?
IaStaiMaPutin 11 months ago
watch, "my creative element tannery row, and tallest organic skyscraper" . for more info. on sacred geometry.
kiwisonfire 1 year ago
Does math make the world or does the world make the math? Can there be an intelligent society out there that has come to a math system that is completely different from ours but still works? Since we use a system that mostly works (There are flaws) why try to find a new system since the one we have took thousands of years to develop? We speak of Motzart as creating music but science discovering a concept. Libeniz system is more accurate and easier so why do we use Newtonian calcus?
alphaboo1 1 year ago
The "logic arguments" are making me smile. SSXtrikE, you should take an elementary logic class...you know, audit it or something...
Stoltzfus 1 year ago
GAY
goldensmoke09 1 year ago
sry...but this is GAY
trizza82 1 year ago
@trizza82 poor soul ahhahahhahhahhahaahah pinche pendejo open ur eyes n mind fool
Helioanthrop 10 months ago
its a vagina!!
trizza82 1 year ago
Notice how the author of the video doesn't back up any of his claims, but instead chooses to pile more claims on his other claims.
Even videos talking about General Relativity from a highly simplified viewpoint back up their claims by mentioning invariance as being the cause for derivation.
This idea doesn't even hint at any intelligent derivation; so where's its justification for being believed?
TwistedLemniscate 1 year ago
vesica pisces is the starting point for life....just like a vagina...which must be passed through for your start!!! And we already know what shape it is as well!!!
Beautiful for sure!!!!
undtektid 1 year ago
Vesica n; "a membranous sac containing gas or liquid." In other words, an EGG! The Fish's EGG! How many times must we look to see God and Science as THE SAME THING??
mac23skidoo 1 year ago
Vesica piscis The Vessel Of The Fish(es)? The Way Of The Fish? This is a reference to Jesus also.
mac23skidoo 1 year ago
You cannot understand sacred geometry through a left brain perspective alone.You need both left and right brains to work in unison in order to comprehend the vesica piscis.
uthumb1 1 year ago
You are close-
mrgalleria 1 year ago
Comment removed
randomtracy 1 year ago
Comment removed
randomtracy 1 year ago
For a musician who really doesn't like "math" lol, this was an excellent intro to the Vesica Piscis! I've always had a thing for Penrose Triangles, what would the relationship be here...
MrTripDawg 1 year ago
For everyone not buying in to this bullshit I recommend reading through the comments for a laugh.
There's just a bunch of spiritualistic nonsense and silly attempts at philosophising here.
TwistedLemniscate 1 year ago
@TwistedLemniscate I understand haters gonna hate, but if you don't like it, just move on. If you like Sacred Geometry, you'll find other's comments to be more support for the idea, and if you don't, you'll think they're silly. No need to bash, no need to get hot under the collar, no need to troll. Just go.
SSXtrikE 1 year ago
@SSXtrikE
But I'm not bashing for a silly reason like a distaste in someone's music, this bashing is not arbitrary, not based on opinion.
This video is promoting falsehoods, and arrives at conclusions that people who actually study the universe (physicits, cosmologists, astronomers, etc.) don't. This Platonism crap has hardly been popular for 2,000 years, and it's on the same level of sillyness as the Geocentric Theory of our solar system.
TwistedLemniscate 1 year ago
@TwistedLemniscate Then let the supposed fools wallow in their lies, and disconcern yourself with such petty matters.
SSXtrikE 1 year ago
@SSXtrikE
I'm commenting because whenever people are given an clearcut explanation of what the universe "is" it impedes on their potential for further investigation.
If you're told that A is the truth, then you'll probably think there's no need to investigate further, and then you may never come to realize that it was really B that was the answer. For never investigating on A's validity, you incorrectly presumed, was unnecessary.
If only you'd taken A as tentative from the start.
TwistedLemniscate 1 year ago
@TwistedLemniscate That's true, but once someone's bought into a belief, you cannot dissuade them. They have to realize it for themselves. Otherwise they'll brand you as a liar, or a troll, or an "infidel". Just let it go.
SSXtrikE 1 year ago
@SSXtrikE
You're correct that I'm not a puppetmaster holding any strings. But the internet, more or less, can only take you places that you wish to go, and many people are spending their time reassuring themselves of things that they already believe.
To observe that there are people who aren't ignorant of these things, and yet arrive at different conclusions might just be the catalyst for them to try and think of these things for themselves.
TwistedLemniscate 1 year ago
@TwistedLemniscate Again, you make a good point. But when you start blatantly dissing someone's beliefs, you just look like an asshole, not a valid, well reasoned alternate opinion.
SSXtrikE 1 year ago
@SSXtrikE
Yeah, but the comment I left before we started our whole conversation was a mathematical proof (syllogistic) that Platonism is self-defeating. Is formulating a mathematical argument not well reasoned?
Galileo would continuously mock other professors about their Aristotlean conception of gravity, and eventually gathered a crowd to watch him drop two varied weighted objects that fell simultaneously. His whole experiment made him to appear as an asshole, but is that why he did it?
TwistedLemniscate 1 year ago
@TwistedLemniscate Galileo provided irrefutable proof for his theories on gravity. Logic, as wonderful as it is, is not irrefutable. Zeno's paradoxes are a fine example, for instance, how he used (mathematically correct) logic to prove motion is impossible, although we know it to be possible.
SSXtrikE 1 year ago
@SSXtrikE
No, Galileo didn't, science doesn't deal with "irrefuatble" anything, only falsifiables.
Zeno's paradoxes did use correct mathematics, though not applied correctly. Achilles-Turtle paradox describes the zooming in on a particular event (Achillies' gaining lead), and not the outcome of the race; Achilles applied the mathematics incorrectly. Similarly, the walking-towards-a-wall paradox (or whatever it's called) describes the zooming in on a particular event too (walking to wall).
TwistedLemniscate 1 year ago
@TwistedLemniscate The entire point of Zeno's paradoxes is that the process of logic can have absurd outcomes. Of course you'll walk to a wall and reach it, though logically you shouldn't be able to cross an infinite amount of points, etc. The process by which you reach the wall is supposedly impossible, therefore, the outcome either doesn't matter because you never reach it or is inconsistent with logic. Furthermore, math is often applied in the physical world, such as astrophysics.
SSXtrikE 1 year ago
@SSXtrikE
The Zeno paradoxes came before the calculus, and therefore ideas such as continuity weren't as strongly understood. Once calculus was understood it became clearly obvious that if we were to correctly apply the math, then Zeno's interpretations of motion were false.
Meaning Zeno's application of the math lead to an impossibility because of his own flaw in applying it, and not an inherent one in the math.
TwistedLemniscate 1 year ago
@TwistedLemniscate You're missing the point. It's not the math that matters, it's the misapplication of logic. And who's to say you're not misapplying your logic and/or math in the disproving of this video's theories?
SSXtrikE 1 year ago
@SSXtrikE
Missing the point? "It's not the math that matters, it's the misapplication of logic;" that's what I've been trying to tell you. We apparently had the same point.
Perhaps I did misapply, but really my real point is something similar to what Kant would say: What's more likely, that the real world adheres itself to mathematics or that mathematics adheres itself to the real world? The latter assertion is clearly the winner, and as a corollary there's nothing sacred about math.
TwistedLemniscate 1 year ago
@TwistedLemniscate Your entire argument is centered around Zeno's bad math, and not that his logic shows how logic can be wrong, as yours is most likely. As for the relation between reality and mathematics, just because math isn't the focal point does not mean that it's unimportant. It defines and conceptualizes reality into meaningful patterns, something most people have difficulty expressing.
SSXtrikE 1 year ago
@SSXtrikE
No, my argument regarding ZP is about misapplication. You can read about his misapplication in the first chapter of many elementary calculus textbooks.
You're only Strawman arguing now. I never said that math is "unimportant," I'm a math enthusiast, and beginning my way to becoming a mathematician (I'm studying advanced calculus and point-set topology atm).
I used "sacred" as a religious religious word to portray that I don't believe math should be combined with religion.
TwistedLemniscate 1 year ago
@TwistedLemniscate And now we come back to the original argument: belief. You don't believe that math should be religious, for legitimate reasons, at least to you. And in my playing devil's advocate, I have provided reasons that are legitimate enough for someone who chooses to believe in Sacred Geometry. It's all about personal choice, and whether someone wants to pray to the Vesica Piscis or Jehova or Allah or a jug of Milk, that's their right, and you can't convince them they're wrong.
SSXtrikE 1 year ago
@SSXtrikE
Obviously the two different beliefs are not the same; I hope you can see the difference between sacred worship and an opinion.
"I have provided reasons that are legitimate enough for..."
So far all of your comments have consisted of you either (1) saying I might be viewed as a troll, asshole, etc., (2) you agreeing with me, (3) using a fallacious interpretation of Zeno's Paradox, (4) or simply saying one can't convince another or [blah]. You'ven't provided a single reason.
TwistedLemniscate 1 year ago
@TwistedLemniscate You said yourself that science doesn't deal with what can be proven, but what can disproven. My reasons may not be straightforward, but by refuting your arguments, I have proof enough for someone who already wants to believe in my argument. If you or someone else doesn't believe this, then my refutations mean nothing to you.
SSXtrikE 1 year ago
@SSXtrikE @SSXtrikE
"You said yourself that science doesn't deal with what can be proven, but what can [be] disproven."
No, whatever I said would be more along the lines of: "Things that don't lend themselves to any sort of test that'll show them to be false are unknowable and therefore beyond the capabilities of empirical analysis."
It's not about the capability of "disproof," but the capability of creating tests that could "disprove." Subtle, but VERY different.
TwistedLemniscate 1 year ago
@SSXtrikE
One who argues with only fallacies cannot refute.
You argued with only fallacies.
Therefore you did not refute.
TwistedLemniscate 1 year ago
@TwistedLemniscate You're dodging the argument I'm making, and it's that my argument lends credence to someone who ALREADY IS WILLING TO BELIEVE IN THIS. It doesn't matter whether I used fallacies or you're just too stupid or self-righteous to see that I'm right. The end result is that if someone takes my side, they take my side and take my arguments for canon, and think you're a pompous ass. If someone refutes me, then they'll think I'm an idiot cultist or whatever.
SSXtrikE 1 year ago
@SSXtrikE
"You're dodging the argument I'm making..."
I may be wrong, but I believe I've confronted every argument you've made.
"It doesn't matter whether I used fallacies"
So having an inability to support yourself on nonflawed arguments doesn't matter? It's typically a good indicator that you're incorrect.
Perhaps you've misunderstood my intentions. I'm currently arguing for the sake of enjoyment, and not to influence readers. Who the hell would be interested in this argument?
TwistedLemniscate 1 year ago
@TwistedLemniscate I'd imagine everyone reading the comments, Twisted. Why else would they even read this? Not only have you avoided the argument of confirmation bias, but you're also taking quotes out of context when it should be read as, in Layman's terms "Either I'm wrong, or you're too biased to see I'm right."
SSXtrikE 1 year ago
@SSXtrikE
Zeno merely applied the math incorrecly.
And math doesn't "prove" anything related to the physical world. You could axiomatize aspects of the real world, but then the axioms would be math and not the physical world.
My thought was that if people believed in Platonism, then they'd surely believe a proof that proved it incorrect. Basically, if Platonism it true then Platonism is false.
And yeah, I'm aware that I'm using math in a Platonistic sort of way to combat Platonism.
TwistedLemniscate 1 year ago
If the Vesica Piscis is the basis of everything, then their must be some sort of Universal Logic.
This is because a mathematical object's existent relies on a logic's existence.
Premises:
(1) The VP is the basis of everything
(2) There must exist a universal logic for a VP to exist
Conclusion:
VP isn't the basis of the universal logic because the universal logic is needed for the VP to exist.
So (1)&~(1)
Unless a logical object can exist without a logic you're in a predicament.
TwistedLemniscate 1 year ago
Comment removed
GBCobber 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TwistedLemniscate. Take a look at "Randy Powell Intro To Vortex Math" (an extension on Marko Rodins work) This is the first time I've looked at sacred geometry and so far only this video but already noticed some correlations.
My insights pertain to psychology and point to a doubling of opportunities when a choice is made in accordance with the principle of allowance(as opposed to injunction which limits them).
Probability thus ensuring perpetual expansion of consciousness + the universe.
GBCobber 1 year ago
What did you call my Jesus fish, pagan?
thruthem 1 year ago
Your moms
all of your moms
are sacred
NmHman127Nugget 1 year ago
Thankh You
reggaeilevel 1 year ago
music just made me wanna get up and shake it on down haha
9elohim9 1 year ago
your videos are very interesting :)
i love how you say Namaste after each comment hehe =)
FrostedBlackCandy 1 year ago
The root,balance, [ dimension ] of what we learn. Where does chaos fit in? I think it's an imbalance. but why?
broodyart 1 year ago
Do you have a book out there that I can get my hands on?
The videos really help, probably better than a book- but I cant take the internet with me, and I feel like this is a SERIOUSLY important thing for me to understand. :) Thanks for teaching.
SpiraLateralus69 1 year ago
I know nothing about this but all I know is Rainbow dome music by Hillage for my brain is on the same wave length...I will however keep this very much in my mind..As I love to feel spirit...
TheFlippertastic 1 year ago
Comment removed
thadea 1 year ago
Truth speaks volumes! Thank you for helping others see clearly as our ancient ancestors did.
StefanoTiano 1 year ago
Namaste, Delagrazia, All. What I am referring to is the creation of Free Will, which did not exist in the earliest Cosmos. The difference is that a veil was inserted, which was done “by Lucifer", who had the knowledge of how God created the universe, and long long ago. Thus, there are two ubiquitous geometries, simultaneous; and Lucifer's is identical in all ways and appearances to the first -- except one. One: an utterly vital fact, which now required 4 steps.
TheGreatDissolve 1 year ago
Its center is this so profoundly deep. So cleverly hidden. A thousand times it passes without notice. Its purpose that. And yet still, discovering it is there, one is made to remove obstacles. In time existed a ransom now.
TheGreatDissolve 1 year ago
Luciferian Geometry, which is the cause of Free Will, has this core quality of opposition, not conjunction. Difference, not of sameness. It means to conceal, hide, confuse and retard -- in an infinite amount of ways -- the Light, the Love. This is shown geometrically. Seek and you shall find. The key is in your hand.
TheGreatDissolve 1 year ago
Høh..? Im finally learning math. And i am enjoying it!
nervesint 1 year ago
love the videos, thanks so much for making these. what if, instead of naturally letting these circles divide themselves by their radius, forming hexagonal patterns, you divided them by phi, and instead got pentagonal patterns? this idea has been reoccurring in my work for decades:D
drphosferrous 1 year ago
Your messages () come across clearly. Your Vision.
gordinidesigns 1 year ago
dah! its magnetic ! it does what it was desighned to do
crystalmomment 1 year ago
3:40 This is Luciferian geometry. Those four circles are the means by which one LOSES the connection to Christ, the first over-arching circle in the Flower of Life. Nor did God create duality. I don't like your teachings.
TheGreatDissolve 1 year ago
Shut up you christian fool!! He is not talking about the bible or any other religion.
nervesint 1 year ago
@TheGreatDissolve god didnt create duality?man woman hot cold +/-
:"Those four circles are the means by which one LOSES .. Fwer of Life."what do u mean?how one looses connection?/i know nothing about these thinks+i may beparallel here but right at the beggining when i saw the2circles in my mind came man/woman and evolution/a higher state when these2unite/alchemy-union(sex) >evolution through unity and the birth of their spiritual child/or man-woman birth of real baby/duality-trinity
delagrazia 1 year ago
"On a recent road trip to Dahlonega Georgia...while riding as a passenger...reclining in my seat with eyes closed...a download of Sacred Geometrics occurred translated through the shadows of the tree tops through Our Sacred Sun. It was a Phenomenal Kaleidescope of vibrant colors all rotating clockwise & then counter-clockwise in a Rainbow Vibration. The Infinite Rocks!
Love Always & Forever,
L.A.A.F.
Pat Timmermans...Purveyor of "Endless Possibilities!"
flashtimm 1 year ago
this is kind of the 1st time i herd of this Vesica Piscis. . . . i know its important. but so far noting is making sence. . . on to the next webpage about it so i can find out more. good video :)
BabyGersh 1 year ago
"Standing in the Center of the Vesica Piscis...Am a Receptor...an Antennae for the Infinite Vibration...Carrying the Resurrection Energy...BEING the Cohesive Energy of Pure Love...the "GLUE" that holds Space...Am a Messenger of the Christ Seed...in Deepest Gratitude in Loving Service to the Almighty Mother-Father God...The Almighty Absolute..."
Love Always & Forever,
L.A.A.F.
Pat Timmermans...Purveyor of "Endless Possibilities!"
flashtimm 1 year ago
"Standing in the Center of the Vesica Piscis...Am a Receptor...an Antennae for the Infinite Vibration...Carrying the Resurrection Energy...BEING the Cohesive Energy of PURE LOVE...the "GLUE" that holds Space...Am a Messenger of the Christ-Seed...in Deepest Gratitude in Loving Service to The Almighy Mother-Father God...The Almighty Absolute..."
Love Always & Forever,
L.A.A.F.
Pat Timmermans...Purveyor of "Endless Possibilities!"
flashtimm 1 year ago
Why is it called Piscis? That means Fish. So it actually looks like a fish.
vassephardi 1 year ago
you think ur tiny little brain on this tiny little rock in the entire universe has enough knowledge to understand the entire universe?
biggbb253 1 year ago
dude, that is heavy.
TheGreenMan2012 1 year ago
I admire this search for creation.
7sevo7 1 year ago
EYE OF HORUS - What the Chiristians are now calling the Eye Of Satan; the Evil Eye; One Eyed Devil. Especially when the iluminati had perverted the spiritualism behind this symbol shown as in the cap-stone of the pyramid on the dollar bill. The Ancient Kemetians knew the Vesica Piscis concept in which the single eye meant 'consciousness, or 'being-awake'-spiritually.
Herucleus 1 year ago
I like your passion here. I think that this form is a reflection of the essence, which I think you also understand to be true. The form of the essence is quite important, of course, and is the "word" so to speak. But the speaker's spirit, the REAL essence, is definitely not this mere form. This is mainly for anyone who doesn't already know this and might assume Gilchrist thinks reality IS that shape there. It's not. That's a formal expression. The essence is a content, a qualia.
wenaolong 1 year ago
That's the relation between subject and object. That's the form of dimensional bridging between quanta and qualia.
wenaolong 1 year ago
Oh My GOD ! I've had vision and dreams of this symbol, did not know what it meant, thank you so much for explaining this to me.
Zane3040 1 year ago
i LOVE you!
GixxxerKim 1 year ago
It is sad to see what people come up with in their search for truth and meaning and order. Just look to Jesus. Simple, easy. God created you, He created the universe, he created your mind, and gave you ability to think and reason. Don't look to geometry for answers. JESUS is the answer.
theninja001 1 year ago
@theninja001 I don't think it is sad - these geometric forms actually do exist, both conceptually and in nature, and are beautiful to look at.
histerics3 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@theninja001 "It is sad to see what people come up with in their search for truth and meaning and order"- Like talking snakes and jesus. At least there's evidence for geometry
stracy93 1 year ago
How about packaging it, via a distribution network (like Blip tv or TubeMogul) into an enrichment "class" for home schoolers? Then you could just follow your bliss, as you do so well, and not be concerned with curriculum, etc.
Beautiful! Divine, for sure. ☼
♥ ☼ ♥
TheseEyesGod 1 year ago
What in quantum physics makes this clear as day?? Could you point me in the right direction? Always been very interested in the golden ratio and sacred geometry. Is it true that the periodic table is made up the 5 perfect solids???
MrHmmm1 1 year ago
Thanks for this video. Beautifully, beautifully done.
mothanasure 1 year ago
Must be easy to make a buck in the US... whip together some hoccus easy to understand hogwash... get a guy with whitened hair, a beard and which knows when to smirk at the right time, and whalla - best seller (The Secret).
kareszt 1 year ago
After i told someone of one of my future dreams, i realized that they unknowingly changed the outcome, so the butterfly effect seems to be an evident theory. All can be changed & it is potential of multiple realities being played out. We can only take THIS observation in for the most part, but anything can be accessed via subconscious. You can access intent through clearing the screen(blackscreen) & consciously pulling up information from past/present/future & travel anywhere.
LendMeYourHand 1 year ago
The Kundalini awakening speaks of the 2 paths. I have had heavy precognition from birth. I had one that i didnt like, so the next night, i yelled out. My subconscious self appeared in front of me. i said i want this to change, i dont want my life to go this way. My other self sais, ok. He/me puts his hand out to shake & he dissolves into me. I immediately started recieving the same signal, but i make a stand in the end. 2 days later, the new dream happens & it changes me & the people involved.
LendMeYourHand 1 year ago
I dont mean to toot my own horn, but Pisces are the beginning & end. A 4 year alignment of the electromagnetic field of the Earth on or around Leap Year. Pisces are duality of the conscious/subconscious. The dreammasters & the most profoundly psychic. Posiedon(Psi) Protected by Sirius. Some believe we were born immortal. We awake in deep Delta & control the blackscreen. We are asleep & awake. Pisces Power!!!
LendMeYourHand 1 year ago
Comment removed
inorbit222 1 year ago
question: Is a ray of light compose of sacred geometry also? Or what is it that we see? And if the universe is holographic then why is sacred geometry structured so it can withstand a push (if you will.)
RHYMePRIMe 1 year ago
so this is the sign that represents Jesus ..the fish , a vesica piscis with a tail?
RHYMePRIMe 1 year ago
i trully see
TheNike2009 1 year ago
Do you see the womb, the sacred feminine? God mind, he/she/it consciousness. Don't think god is a he.
rickym23227 1 year ago 8
Very interesting and beautiful.
Thank you for sharing.
lilisigel 1 year ago
Vesica Pisces, where the spiritual world intersects the physical world all things spring forth from the womb of creation.
Paddyllfixit 1 year ago
Hi Charles - are you on Facebook???
Many blessings from Marianne in Ontario and Frank Chester in San Francisco
simcoeregionchapter 1 year ago
This comment has rec