What's so great about Wallace Stevens also, is the randomness of his greatness.
We're talking about a guy who spent the first half of his life in relative obscurity as an insurance adjuster in Pennsylvania, and then quietly wrote some of the 20th centuries most deeply moving language, so replete with modernity and understated elegance.
Perhaps that's when the mind is best suited to write great lines; when it isn't focused on the greatness of self, but rather the greatness around it.
I remember a professor's comment at college regarding Wallace Stevens, that makes more and more sense as I age, having heard poets try to outdo each other along verbose and spectacular fronts.
He said "There has never been a poet, who could move people so deeply, using almost only words everyone knows."
So true...Stevens rarely used esoteric language...rather, he used common language, with esoteric phrasing.
He could build a masterpiece with the tools of a laymen...so clever.
I greatly admire Stevens, but the point about simple language is true of most of the strong poets in English, Shakespeare expempted. In fact, Stevens had the ludicrous notion that English was Gallic at base, and certainly liked to display the peacock's tail of his diction.
I first heard these last lines in college at 20, and I knew they were great. Now I see their greatness is beautiful and devastating at the same time. Because I'm old now, I can understand the poem's full emotional content.
Yes, this is possibly the greatest poem of the 20th century. I had a professor who taught it at Hunter that made me realize what a powerful gift it can be to expose and explore a poem together.
Is this Stevens himself reading?
justinmjones10 9 months ago
@justinmjones10 Hehe, no it's me! Regards, Charles
brychar66 9 months ago
A perfect reading of this great poem, the beauty of the language is almost overwhelming just to read it, but his voice and tone add even more
mackjay2 1 year ago
i've almost memorized this poem... i has to be my favorite by far.... since i was in school.
Nowekian 2 years ago
I just listened to The Waste Land. I came to revisit this as an antidote.
I take it that Eliot recoiled from the modernist situation in horror, while Stevens came along and accepted it in magnificence.
trisoctehedron 2 years ago 2
Thank you so much for sharing this.
loveyoutodeathbut 2 years ago
What's so great about Wallace Stevens also, is the randomness of his greatness.
We're talking about a guy who spent the first half of his life in relative obscurity as an insurance adjuster in Pennsylvania, and then quietly wrote some of the 20th centuries most deeply moving language, so replete with modernity and understated elegance.
Perhaps that's when the mind is best suited to write great lines; when it isn't focused on the greatness of self, but rather the greatness around it.
slitheringinterstate 3 years ago 4
I agree with you entirely. Same applies to Eliot who worked as a bank clerk.
brychar66 3 years ago
A bank clerk? He worked as an account executive at Lloyds
and later as a director of Faber&Faber publishing co.
bbethany7 2 years ago
Stevens worked as a lawyer for a Hartford, Conn,
insurance firm his whole working life. His colleagues knew
nothing of his career as a poet.
bbethany7 2 years ago
Beautiful. One of my favorite poems. But, unfortunately, you had to leave out some of my favorite parts. For example:
"At evening, casual flocks of pigeons make
Ambiguous undulations as they sink,
Downward to darkness, on extended wings."
eadavisl 3 years ago
yes you are right - that particular section is tremendous; but listen again, my friend, it is there, at the end! 5.47 to the end.
brychar66 3 years ago
I remember a professor's comment at college regarding Wallace Stevens, that makes more and more sense as I age, having heard poets try to outdo each other along verbose and spectacular fronts.
He said "There has never been a poet, who could move people so deeply, using almost only words everyone knows."
So true...Stevens rarely used esoteric language...rather, he used common language, with esoteric phrasing.
He could build a masterpiece with the tools of a laymen...so clever.
slitheringinterstate 3 years ago 2
Sure. And in those three lines the magic is in the adjectives.
brychar66 3 years ago
I greatly admire Stevens, but the point about simple language is true of most of the strong poets in English, Shakespeare expempted. In fact, Stevens had the ludicrous notion that English was Gallic at base, and certainly liked to display the peacock's tail of his diction.
grobbledonk 2 years ago
I first heard these last lines in college at 20, and I knew they were great. Now I see their greatness is beautiful and devastating at the same time. Because I'm old now, I can understand the poem's full emotional content.
trisoctehedron 3 years ago
Thise lines aren't missed out. Perhaps you switched it off early!
grobbledonk 2 years ago
Yes, this is possibly the greatest poem of the 20th century. I had a professor who taught it at Hunter that made me realize what a powerful gift it can be to expose and explore a poem together.
wildgal43 3 years ago
It's certainly the most wonderful poem. Sorry I couldn't read it all. Chas.
brychar66 3 years ago
A most wonderful reading of a favorite poem...
king7wood 4 years ago
fine choice and i like the matisse...can i ask if there is some specific connection between matisse and stevens?
songoftherushes 4 years ago
Nothing specific,it just started with the woman in the dressing gown (or out of it!) so I carried on with the Matisse theme. Regards, Charles.
brychar66 4 years ago
I have no words. He used all the best ones.
dianasatyr 4 years ago
Beautiful poem.....
Sutch74 4 years ago
great images. great poem.
boynamedblue 4 years ago
One of the greatest poems of the 20th century.
extitan9 4 years ago
Cheers! He's very good, supposedly influenced by the French Symbolist poets who I love in any case so that's fine by me!
brychar66 4 years ago
Wow! That was like an incantation ... I have never yet read Wallace Stevens but I shall. Thanks.
MightyMelmoth 4 years ago