And to speak of , this is a propulsion system not a generator... the guy who invented this also created the gearless differential that formula 1 uses... put the hula hoops on quotes there I don't want anyone mocking me.
We have a different way of thinking, I'm sorry you can't understand how this mechanism works... but you can make free energy generators let's say (as simple as I can explain it) : by using opposing hula hoops as generators on a "vibrating" rod connected to each other. Many more mechanisms are in my head right now that I can't explain here. You are not using "free" energy rather than using mechanic energy from materials, momentum, gravitional energy to convert it to whatever energy you want.
Newton's third law typifies the kind of flat land, pool ball thinking that numbs bright young minds: "Every action"... (said as though actions were things that had distinct beginnings and endings which could be considered separate from the ever spirally, wobbling, jiggling mess of motion and/or expanding, cooling, warming, shrinking, ablating, radiating, waving and counter waving, kinking and unkinking of concentrations of confused accelerations and decelerations of motion generally reffere
you endanger yourself and anyone who would to have these items. have children and teach them, progressive learning. everything is monitored, an induvidual with these capabilitys is a danger to some people out there.
i think its using a combination of inertia and gyroscopic precession to produce a net upward force effectively producing lift. does it work though? is there a scale prototype?
BTW Mr Inventor, you will never get a patent on this concept because it has already been patented by Alfio Di Bella. OTOH, he stole the idea from an even earlier patent ... so who knows?
Note to 'Greens': have you ever calculated how much energy, and other resources, is wasted by crackpots?
There are hundreds of crackpot inventions, like this one, listed at the patent office. The inventors all 'see what they want to see' and completely overlook Newton's 3rd law.
IMHO, it's an Inertial propulsion system. (Rigorously, an antigravity device produces an opposing spacetime curvature, complete with an improper acceleration - but just watch that electric meter go!). Inertial propulsions distract matter from the ambient gravitational field into a dominant local frame. Gyros for example. Newton III is being obeyed in both cases. Excellent work
@GMANIM Don't repeat pseudoscientific twaddle as if it were fact. Sure, there are engineers who believe in 'inertial propulsion'; but engineers are surprisingly bad at physics. It is easy to build something that will move 'mysteriously' across a shiny surface without using wheels or gas-jets. Why are engineers so easily fooled by this artefact? Well, have you ever noticed how short the 'friction' section is in most textbooks? In fact, it is a complex phenomenon. IP does not work in space.
@GMANIM Nobody in their right minds would actually waste funding on that, since the concept is ludicrous. I meant that IP cannot work in space, since contact with a surface is essential. Crackpot inventors are baffled by the absence of any obvious propelling device such as a wheel. In fact, it is the non-linearity and asymmetry of friction which permits motion. Textbooks give the impression that the friction coefficient is a constant. In fact, it is an orientation- and velocity- ...
In fact, there would be no need to test it in space: all that one has to do to test IP under space-like conditions is to suspend the device as a ballistic pendulum. If IP works in the absence of a contacting surface then it would be possible for the device to maintain itself in a stable position, far from bdc. No such test has ever succeeded.
The idea behind this is that the rotating arms carry weights that,the way they are rotating,are creating moreupward momentum than downward.This may not lift the object but may lessen it's actual weight.It's not an energy-free mechanism but at least it's not a direct propultion system(like the ones used in rockets).It may not be the solution to antigravity but at least it's better than having no ideas yourselves and just post"no antigravity, lame"...If you have something better to propose,plz do!
It doesn't do anything about interfering with the weak magnetic force much less act upon the Strong Magnetic or Strong Nuclear Forces. It sets up no field of it's own and has no apparent mode of self-powering, meaning it would have to be powered from outside the supposed "anti-gravitational" effect area.
As far as I can see this is a fallacy with this device. However, Anti-Gravity does exist and can be reproduced if you know what you're doing.
this device would work. explanation: in the first 20 seconds you see both arms spinning in a full circle. focus on one arm. if it were spinning alone the device would be unbalanced because the weight would move in a circle causing the device to be pulled towards the weight. this would be like an unbalanced wheel vibrating as it spun. now cut the circle in half. force is moving from side to bottom to side, but never to the top. you would have a net force going down in the animation.
@Naprelan If this where true energy is being created. As the angular moment of the arms is independent of the acceleration of the center of mass. He's also created a free energy machine.
As a skeptic, it's funny to read about people who will jump on and call you a dumb ass. I want to see it work more to see short sighted know-it-alls eat their words. In-the-box thinking never did anything outside of a box. What did going with the crowd EVER accomplish? Being wrong is not so bad. It's only bad if you give up trying.
Δεν μπορω να καταλαβω πως αυτος ο μηχανισμος θα μπορουσε να δημιουργισει ΑΝΤΙΒΑΡΥΤΗΤΑ η να επιρεασει θετικα η αρνητικα την βαρυτητα, αλλα οποιος θελει να βεβαιωθει θα πρεπει να κανει γυρο απο αυτον η και εντος αυτου τουλαχιστον μετρησεις ατμοσφαιρικης πιεσης.
@FullMusicEcho just to be able to read the inside of this mechanism that gravity is reduced or negated, it would be a GREAT start to anti-gravity research.
squirrelspown, this "box" dosnt produce antigravity. It only distribute centrifugal and centripetal force on 180 degrees. Antigravity is somthin very different. Antigravity is the opposite of gravity and this also dosnt mean its the same thing as a magnet pole's like North and South wich attract or repel. We know what gravity is but not sure about antigravity what it is or if it even exist... Antigravity still is between the missunderstood terms like: dark matter, dark energy, antimatter
this principle does work and i have built the same mechanism and tested it fiew years ago, i could say i had the same ideea so reinventing somethin invented does happen, anyway it works in real and whats funny: its not used to anything this principle. Or maybe it is somewhere someone... :)
Free energy has been here all along ,But Elite controllers don't want ppl to be free from the costs of energy,Go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints for a genuine magnet motor ,Join the energy revolution!
@squirrelspown because of the way the counter weights are spinning one rotation pulls it up while tthe next rotation pulls it down therefore the direction moving never changes so the theory is if u start this in mid air and let go of it it will stay somewhat vibrating in mid-air...hope this helped thanks =)
Αν καταλαβαίνω καλά, μέσω αυτού του κινηματικού μηχανισμού, οι φυγόκεντρες δυνάμεις των μαζών ασκούνται συνεχώς προς τα πάνω, οπότε προκύπτει συνεχώς μια δύναμη αντιθετη απο το βαρος που μπορει να λειτουργησει προωθητικα. Πανεξυπνο μου φαινεται...
how rude. lol. U are absolutely right about basic knowledge and about us as people who dont know shit about nature and how it works. But this thing is a mechanical device made by humans. And we do know how our own stuff works cause we build it
Poly kalo. Elpizo na min exete provlima me diaforous periergous poy kynigane tis nees idees. Stin asimetria mou fainetai einai to zoumi px. 3 epaliloi konoi me magnites. Kai pali bravo!
gay
sethdux123456 1 month ago
I am very happy to see the vidoe after you give this a prototype of a propulsion mechanism based on a new kinematics theory of physics
AntoMelta 1 month ago
I Love The Video It Can Increase My Knowledge a prototype of a propulsion mechanism based on a new kinematics theory of physics
willamricard 1 month ago
Steady I Really Like This Video Antigravity Mechanism - a prototype of a propulsion mechanism based on a new kinematics theory of physic
imegatrone 1 month ago
Good, I like that you share this video a prototype of a propulsion mechanism based on a new kinematics theory of physics , I wish success always
Melehete 1 month ago
Nice Video a prototype of a propulsion mechanism based on a new kinematics theory of physics That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You
NganaJHone 1 month ago
I Really Like The Video From Your a prototype of a propulsion mechanism based on a new kinematics theory of physics
Ondelendo 1 month ago
Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing a prototype of a propulsion mechanism based on a new kinematics theory of physics
bundawartini 1 month ago
it doesnt work , in all 4D parabolics in each Dimension are counteracting on each other so its zero , no up no down ...
85maxspeed 1 month ago
re file afto miazi me sta8eropiiti dn pistevo na liturgi, isos an ta e3igouses perisotero
manologrhacker 1 month ago
Comment removed
giorgos10000 1 month ago
Comment removed
giorgos10000 1 month ago
If this had just been a video showing a sample of computer generated imagery it would have been great. As it is, it's just a waste of time.
Illisil 2 months ago
@Illisil see here /watch?v=-ySUr7iD-uU
giorgos10000 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
And to speak of , this is a propulsion system not a generator... the guy who invented this also created the gearless differential that formula 1 uses... put the hula hoops on quotes there I don't want anyone mocking me.
giorgos10000 2 months ago
Comment removed
giorgos10000 2 months ago
We have a different way of thinking, I'm sorry you can't understand how this mechanism works... but you can make free energy generators let's say (as simple as I can explain it) : by using opposing hula hoops as generators on a "vibrating" rod connected to each other. Many more mechanisms are in my head right now that I can't explain here. You are not using "free" energy rather than using mechanic energy from materials, momentum, gravitional energy to convert it to whatever energy you want.
giorgos10000 2 months ago
There are more than enough data here that prooves Mr. Tsiriggakis theory:
h t t p : / / w w w . tsiriggakis.gr/Files/04GRM/3rdEYEv2Jan2008.pdf
You can also see this experiment in action here:
h t t p : / / w w w . y o utube.com/watch?v=-ySUr7iD-uU&feature=related
giorgos10000 2 months ago
@giorgos10000 That's as ridiculous a theory as thinking that
you can make free-energy machines with magnets just because
magnets make "invisible forces" and feel like they're pushing on
you like little magic invisible animals. Gyroscopes do the same,
thus the delusions that this can work.
rstevewarmorycom 2 months ago
my guess is this : if u spin something fast enough the gravity doesn't cach it
cris23dumi 4 months ago 5
This is why figure skaters fly into the stands.
Bandaloope 5 months ago
This will work... all we have to do is ignore physics
RandyJ007 5 months ago
Newton's third law typifies the kind of flat land, pool ball thinking that numbs bright young minds: "Every action"... (said as though actions were things that had distinct beginnings and endings which could be considered separate from the ever spirally, wobbling, jiggling mess of motion and/or expanding, cooling, warming, shrinking, ablating, radiating, waving and counter waving, kinking and unkinking of concentrations of confused accelerations and decelerations of motion generally reffere
tommymorey 5 months ago
you endanger yourself and anyone who would to have these items. have children and teach them, progressive learning. everything is monitored, an induvidual with these capabilitys is a danger to some people out there.
11kungfu11 5 months ago
i think its using a combination of inertia and gyroscopic precession to produce a net upward force effectively producing lift. does it work though? is there a scale prototype?
o0bananaman0o 5 months ago
BTW Mr Inventor, you will never get a patent on this concept because it has already been patented by Alfio Di Bella. OTOH, he stole the idea from an even earlier patent ... so who knows?
Note to 'Greens': have you ever calculated how much energy, and other resources, is wasted by crackpots?
flowerbower 6 months ago
There are hundreds of crackpot inventions, like this one, listed at the patent office. The inventors all 'see what they want to see' and completely overlook Newton's 3rd law.
flowerbower 6 months ago
IMHO, it's an Inertial propulsion system. (Rigorously, an antigravity device produces an opposing spacetime curvature, complete with an improper acceleration - but just watch that electric meter go!). Inertial propulsions distract matter from the ambient gravitational field into a dominant local frame. Gyros for example. Newton III is being obeyed in both cases. Excellent work
GMANIM 6 months ago
@GMANIM Don't repeat pseudoscientific twaddle as if it were fact. Sure, there are engineers who believe in 'inertial propulsion'; but engineers are surprisingly bad at physics. It is easy to build something that will move 'mysteriously' across a shiny surface without using wheels or gas-jets. Why are engineers so easily fooled by this artefact? Well, have you ever noticed how short the 'friction' section is in most textbooks? In fact, it is a complex phenomenon. IP does not work in space.
flowerbower 6 months ago
@flowerbower Who tested 'IP' in space?
GMANIM 6 months ago
@GMANIM Nobody in their right minds would actually waste funding on that, since the concept is ludicrous. I meant that IP cannot work in space, since contact with a surface is essential. Crackpot inventors are baffled by the absence of any obvious propelling device such as a wheel. In fact, it is the non-linearity and asymmetry of friction which permits motion. Textbooks give the impression that the friction coefficient is a constant. In fact, it is an orientation- and velocity- ...
flowerbower 6 months ago
@GMANIM [cont.] dependent tensor quantity.
In fact, there would be no need to test it in space: all that one has to do to test IP under space-like conditions is to suspend the device as a ballistic pendulum. If IP works in the absence of a contacting surface then it would be possible for the device to maintain itself in a stable position, far from bdc. No such test has ever succeeded.
flowerbower 6 months ago
LOL its a fancy office desck toy
chrisbell1987 6 months ago
not anti gravity
TheSaltysack 7 months ago
Longest video description i have ever seen... thumbs up if u didnt read it all
kaylor87 7 months ago
but u can spin it one more time
chicksdigmy12in 7 months ago
and why isnt this attached to my car yet?
chicksdigmy12in 7 months ago
build it
0clanmovies 8 months ago
wow u must be really freaking smart
edzorz 8 months ago
der...something spinning~ der...no control if it did displace G. hello!
44thcustomer 8 months ago
all it needs is a chuck norris push for antigravity.... he was too fast to be captured in this video though
Vikosaurus 8 months ago
The idea behind this is that the rotating arms carry weights that,the way they are rotating,are creating moreupward momentum than downward.This may not lift the object but may lessen it's actual weight.It's not an energy-free mechanism but at least it's not a direct propultion system(like the ones used in rockets).It may not be the solution to antigravity but at least it's better than having no ideas yourselves and just post"no antigravity, lame"...If you have something better to propose,plz do!
Niphrentil 8 months ago 3
I dont' get this. What is this thing? what are your inventions? what are you offering?
This is not messaged correctly.
superdiza 9 months ago
xD omg there is no antigravity. people like u are so ... primitive! eso-freaks
SebushMcChill 9 months ago
e3igise mas ti akrivos simveni
manologrhacker 9 months ago
Dont think its anti-gravity - but rather a really efficient machine that recycles its own energy or motion.
dadubs93 9 months ago
i saw this with my lawn-mower in florida too, two days later it was broken
tamaramj 10 months ago
Sorry, but this thing would never work.
It doesn't do anything about interfering with the weak magnetic force much less act upon the Strong Magnetic or Strong Nuclear Forces. It sets up no field of it's own and has no apparent mode of self-powering, meaning it would have to be powered from outside the supposed "anti-gravitational" effect area.
As far as I can see this is a fallacy with this device. However, Anti-Gravity does exist and can be reproduced if you know what you're doing.
DrGoodwrench64 10 months ago
@DrGoodwrench64 If it can then not in a very convincing manner, duh.
heloizyjhenifer 9 months ago
this device would work. explanation: in the first 20 seconds you see both arms spinning in a full circle. focus on one arm. if it were spinning alone the device would be unbalanced because the weight would move in a circle causing the device to be pulled towards the weight. this would be like an unbalanced wheel vibrating as it spun. now cut the circle in half. force is moving from side to bottom to side, but never to the top. you would have a net force going down in the animation.
Naprelan 1 year ago
@Naprelan If this where true energy is being created. As the angular moment of the arms is independent of the acceleration of the center of mass. He's also created a free energy machine.
repatte 11 months ago
cool adaptation of a giro if that is what it is
DragonRoLo 1 year ago
As a skeptic, it's funny to read about people who will jump on and call you a dumb ass. I want to see it work more to see short sighted know-it-alls eat their words. In-the-box thinking never did anything outside of a box. What did going with the crowd EVER accomplish? Being wrong is not so bad. It's only bad if you give up trying.
jnhrtmn 1 year ago
Δεν μπορω να καταλαβω πως αυτος ο μηχανισμος θα μπορουσε να δημιουργισει ΑΝΤΙΒΑΡΥΤΗΤΑ η να επιρεασει θετικα η αρνητικα την βαρυτητα, αλλα οποιος θελει να βεβαιωθει θα πρεπει να κανει γυρο απο αυτον η και εντος αυτου τουλαχιστον μετρησεις ατμοσφαιρικης πιεσης.
FullMusicEcho 1 year ago
@FullMusicEcho just to be able to read the inside of this mechanism that gravity is reduced or negated, it would be a GREAT start to anti-gravity research.
jayteean 1 year ago
It looks more like an elaborate exotic pendulum... Funny thing about pendulums is they use gravity to work they do not negate gravity.
MrAwsome514 1 year ago
A 3-axis device? That's been done, it's called the gravitron, which has nothing to do with gravity. NASA uses one to train their astronauts.
UnderManiac 1 year ago
ive messed with an animation program before made somthing exactly like this. its called pivot
jjaquu 1 year ago
its like the thing from CONTACT, that somehow fast spherical motions create vortexex or something..
crittertv 1 year ago
greek inventor design this
21Anastasios 1 year ago
squirrelspown, this "box" dosnt produce antigravity. It only distribute centrifugal and centripetal force on 180 degrees. Antigravity is somthin very different. Antigravity is the opposite of gravity and this also dosnt mean its the same thing as a magnet pole's like North and South wich attract or repel. We know what gravity is but not sure about antigravity what it is or if it even exist... Antigravity still is between the missunderstood terms like: dark matter, dark energy, antimatter
AlexandruBogdan81 1 year ago
this principle does work and i have built the same mechanism and tested it fiew years ago, i could say i had the same ideea so reinventing somethin invented does happen, anyway it works in real and whats funny: its not used to anything this principle. Or maybe it is somewhere someone... :)
AlexandruBogdan81 1 year ago
@AlexandruBogdan81 This mechanism could NEVER produce anti-gravity. Don't be a dumbass!
UnderManiac 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy has been here all along ,But Elite controllers don't want ppl to be free from the costs of energy,Go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints for a genuine magnet motor ,Join the energy revolution!
gordinflon232425 1 year ago
cool wasted my time again, die fuckwit.
reefbreaker 1 year ago
you can do anything in animation, build it.
71296105195 1 year ago
η δυο τριαξονικους... θα ηταν πολυ καλυτερο και ο καθενας σε αντιθετη φορα απο αυτη που εχουν...
Akatanomastos4u 1 year ago
του λειπει κατι... πρεπει να βαλει 3 τριαξονικους αξονες... να λειτουργουν με την ιδια μεθοδο...
Akatanomastos4u 1 year ago
Very interesting concept.
OTTONUS 1 year ago
fail
Yevhen123 1 year ago
wow so why does this spinning box thing produce anti gravity?
squirrelspown 1 year ago 34
@squirrelspown opposing centrifugal forces, like a gyroscope, and this almost opposes al directions but he is missing an axis
wispers187 1 year ago
@squirrelspown
not at all i think^^
nsawilla 1 year ago
@squirrelspown
it doesn't
hobbiz 1 year ago
@squirrelspown It doesn't.
flowerbower 6 months ago
@squirrelspown because of the way the counter weights are spinning one rotation pulls it up while tthe next rotation pulls it down therefore the direction moving never changes so the theory is if u start this in mid air and let go of it it will stay somewhat vibrating in mid-air...hope this helped thanks =)
brandonsg123 1 month ago
It's the same guy that invented the differential that formula 1 has, and they stole it from him. He makes watches and flying discs!
giorgos10000 1 year ago
for every action, there is an opposite and equal reaction.
whether it's spinning or not...
mhread 1 year ago 3
Wow that explains everything!
helicrashpro 1 year ago
kjyytyuty means my shirt is white
dish125db 1 year ago
They have the device upside down it would generate unbalanced oscillation into the ground. Check out "Dean Drive" for a similar idea.
tlsnodgrass1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Βασικά είναι πολύ παλιό κόλπο! Γνωστό ως αδρανειακή πρόωση.
Fotai19 2 years ago
Αν καταλαβαίνω καλά, μέσω αυτού του κινηματικού μηχανισμού, οι φυγόκεντρες δυνάμεις των μαζών ασκούνται συνεχώς προς τα πάνω, οπότε προκύπτει συνεχώς μια δύναμη αντιθετη απο το βαρος που μπορει να λειτουργησει προωθητικα. Πανεξυπνο μου φαινεται...
kosarg11 2 years ago
take me to your leader!
whotookmynickkokokai 2 years ago
@whotookmynickkokokai fail uncle sam joke!
camelazo 2 years ago
Comment removed
Fotai19 2 years ago
he bilt something weird.He doesnt explain anithing, and there it is! an antigravity machine!!!!
demotulation 2 years ago
@demotulation I would have to agree, no explanation given, you could say even a box accelerating threw space is an anti gravity machine.
Jammieg001 2 years ago 10
so alot of spinning creates antigravity? lol
minion6500 3 years ago
First check their site THEN make an opinion.
IaOIWXqH9Io
As I understand the center of the mass is above the machine when operates!
kalimeraHellas 3 years ago
Eric Laithwaite
kalimeraHellas 3 years ago
lol. okey. basic knowledge of mechanics anyone?
ActiveStorage 3 years ago
Put your "lol", you known where. Mechanics is open subject. Nature is not described sufficient. THERE IS NOT SUCH THING AS
"basic knowledge". Every day we learn something. So, better start to learn or to re-learn. Are you able take the challenge?
kalimeraHellas 3 years ago
how rude. lol. U are absolutely right about basic knowledge and about us as people who dont know shit about nature and how it works. But this thing is a mechanical device made by humans. And we do know how our own stuff works cause we build it
ActiveStorage 3 years ago
If you know "how stuff works" then why ask for a basic knowledge of mechanics 3 posts earlier? You are trolling nothing more.
kalimeraHellas 3 years ago
so i could make fun of this mechanical devise
ActiveStorage 3 years ago
Comment removed
kalimeraHellas 3 years ago
well, at least im not lying and being honest with you. I wish those who invented this anti-gravity thing could be honest with you too.
if there was no lies around the world would flourish.
ActiveStorage 2 years ago
Comment removed
kalimeraHellas 2 years ago
well actually no. u do )
ActiveStorage 2 years ago
Comment removed
kalimeraHellas 2 years ago
Good Day Shalomsky !
Are you from the "khazarian Autonomus Oblast:";)
west from Vladivostock ;)
just asking!
zigsauer 2 years ago
lol. nope. Obninsk, Kalugskaya oblast )
whats up with u? )
ActiveStorage 2 years ago
So you a Wandering khazarian ?;)
just asking!
zigsauer 2 years ago
lol u retarded? )
keep asking. it's okey
ActiveStorage 2 years ago
Comment removed
zigsauer 2 years ago
Well if you was a woman I would let you play my " "Fiddle" on the roof " ;)
zigsauer 2 years ago
Me ..... , Im No-one !
zigsauer 2 years ago
Συγχαρητήρια για την ιδέα σας. Ανοίγει νέους ορίζοντες για την εξερεύνηση του διαστήματος με σφραγίδα Ελληνική
antoniosperipatitis 3 years ago
Poly kalo. Elpizo na min exete provlima me diaforous periergous poy kynigane tis nees idees. Stin asimetria mou fainetai einai to zoumi px. 3 epaliloi konoi me magnites. Kai pali bravo!
kalimeraHellas 3 years ago