Added: 3 years ago
From: tsiriggakis
Views: 54,041
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (112)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • gay

  • I am very happy to see the vidoe after you give this a prototype of a propulsion mechanism based on a new kinematics theory of physics

  • I Love The Video It Can Increase My Knowledge a prototype of a propulsion mechanism based on a new kinematics theory of physics

  • Steady I Really Like This Video Antigravity Mechanism - a prototype of a propulsion mechanism based on a new kinematics theory of physic

  • Good, I like that you share this video a prototype of a propulsion mechanism based on a new kinematics theory of physics , I wish success always

  • Nice Video a prototype of a propulsion mechanism based on a new kinematics theory of physics That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You

  • I Really Like The Video From Your a prototype of a propulsion mechanism based on a new kinematics theory of physics

  • Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing a prototype of a propulsion mechanism based on a new kinematics theory of physics

  • it doesnt work , in all 4D parabolics in each Dimension are counteracting on each other so its zero , no up no down ...

  • re file afto miazi me sta8eropiiti dn pistevo na liturgi, isos an ta e3igouses perisotero

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • If this had just been a video showing a sample of computer generated imagery it would have been great. As it is, it's just a waste of time.

  • @Illisil see here /watch?v=-ySUr7iD-uU

  • Comment removed

  • We have a different way of thinking, I'm sorry you can't understand how this mechanism works... but you can make free energy generators let's say (as simple as I can explain it) : by using opposing hula hoops as generators on a "vibrating" rod connected to each other. Many more mechanisms are in my head right now that I can't explain here. You are not using "free" energy rather than using mechanic energy from materials, momentum, gravitional energy to convert it to whatever energy you want.

  • There are more than enough data here that prooves Mr. Tsiriggakis theory:

    h t t p : / / w w w . tsiriggakis.gr/Files/04GRM/3rd­EYEv2Jan2008.pdf

    You can also see this experiment in action here:

    h t t p : / / w w w . y o utube.com/watch?v=-ySUr7iD-uU&­feature=related

  • @giorgos10000 That's as ridiculous a theory as thinking that

    you can make free-energy machines with magnets just because

    magnets make "invisible forces" and feel like they're pushing on

    you like little magic invisible animals. Gyroscopes do the same,

    thus the delusions that this can work.

  • my guess is this : if u spin something fast enough the gravity doesn't cach it

  • This is why figure skaters fly into the stands.

  • This will work... all we have to do is ignore physics

  • Newton's third law typifies the kind of flat land, pool ball thinking that numbs bright young minds: "Every action"... (said as though actions were things that had distinct beginnings and endings which could be considered separate from the ever spirally, wobbling, jiggling mess of motion and/or expanding, cooling, warming, shrinking, ablating, radiating, waving and counter waving, kinking and unkinking of concentrations of confused accelerations and decelerations of motion generally reffere

  • you endanger yourself and anyone who would to have these items. have children and teach them, progressive learning. everything is monitored, an induvidual with these capabilitys is a danger to some people out there.

  • i think its using a combination of inertia and gyroscopic precession to produce a net upward force effectively producing lift. does it work though? is there a scale prototype?

  • BTW Mr Inventor, you will never get a patent on this concept because it has already been patented by Alfio Di Bella. OTOH, he stole the idea from an even earlier patent ... so who knows?

    Note to 'Greens': have you ever calculated how much energy, and other resources, is wasted by crackpots?

  • There are hundreds of crackpot inventions, like this one, listed at the patent office. The inventors all 'see what they want to see' and completely overlook Newton's 3rd law.

  • IMHO, it's an Inertial propulsion system. (Rigorously, an antigravity device produces an opposing spacetime curvature, complete with an improper acceleration - but just watch that electric meter go!). Inertial propulsions distract matter from the ambient gravitational field into a dominant local frame. Gyros for example. Newton III is being obeyed in both cases. Excellent work

  • @GMANIM Don't repeat pseudoscientific twaddle as if it were fact. Sure, there are engineers who believe in 'inertial propulsion'; but engineers are surprisingly bad at physics. It is easy to build something that will move 'mysteriously' across a shiny surface without using wheels or gas-jets. Why are engineers so easily fooled by this artefact? Well, have you ever noticed how short the 'friction' section is in most textbooks? In fact, it is a complex phenomenon. IP does not work in space.

  • @flowerbower Who tested 'IP' in space?

  • @GMANIM Nobody in their right minds would actually waste funding on that, since the concept is ludicrous. I meant that IP cannot work in space, since contact with a surface is essential. Crackpot inventors are baffled by the absence of any obvious propelling device such as a wheel. In fact, it is the non-linearity and asymmetry of friction which permits motion. Textbooks give the impression that the friction coefficient is a constant. In fact, it is an orientation- and velocity- ...

  • @GMANIM [cont.] dependent tensor quantity.

    In fact, there would be no need to test it in space: all that one has to do to test IP under space-like conditions is to suspend the device as a ballistic pendulum. If IP works in the absence of a contacting surface then it would be possible for the device to maintain itself in a stable position, far from bdc. No such test has ever succeeded.

  • LOL its a fancy office desck toy

  • not anti gravity

  • Longest video description i have ever seen... thumbs up if u didnt read it all

  • but u can spin it one more time

  • and why isnt this attached to my car yet?

  • build it

  • wow u must be really freaking smart

  • der...something spinning~ der...no control if it did displace G. hello!

  • all it needs is a chuck norris push for antigravity.... he was too fast to be captured in this video though

  • The idea behind this is that the rotating arms carry weights that,the way they are rotating,are creating moreupward momentum than downward.This may not lift the object but may lessen it's actual weight.It's not an energy-free mechanism but at least it's not a direct propultion system(like the ones used in rockets).It may not be the solution to antigravity but at least it's better than having no ideas yourselves and just post"no antigravity, lame"...If you have something better to propose,plz do!

  • I dont' get this. What is this thing? what are your inventions? what are you offering?

    This is not messaged correctly.

  • xD omg there is no antigravity. people like u are so ... primitive! eso-freaks

  • e3igise mas ti akrivos simveni

  • Dont think its anti-gravity - but rather a really efficient machine that recycles its own energy or motion.

  • i saw this with my lawn-mower in florida too, two days later it was broken

  • Sorry, but this thing would never work.

    It doesn't do anything about interfering with the weak magnetic force much less act upon the Strong Magnetic or Strong Nuclear Forces. It sets up no field of it's own and has no apparent mode of self-powering, meaning it would have to be powered from outside the supposed "anti-gravitational" effect area.

    As far as I can see this is a fallacy with this device. However, Anti-Gravity does exist and can be reproduced if you know what you're doing.

  • @DrGoodwrench64 If it can then not in a very convincing manner, duh.

  • this device would work. explanation: in the first 20 seconds you see both arms spinning in a full circle. focus on one arm. if it were spinning alone the device would be unbalanced because the weight would move in a circle causing the device to be pulled towards the weight. this would be like an unbalanced wheel vibrating as it spun. now cut the circle in half. force is moving from side to bottom to side, but never to the top. you would have a net force going down in the animation.

  • @Naprelan If this where true energy is being created. As the angular moment of the arms is independent of the acceleration of the center of mass. He's also created a free energy machine.

  • cool adaptation of a giro if that is what it is

  • As a skeptic, it's funny to read about people who will jump on and call you a dumb ass. I want to see it work more to see short sighted know-it-alls eat their words. In-the-box thinking never did anything outside of a box. What did going with the crowd EVER accomplish? Being wrong is not so bad. It's only bad if you give up trying.

  • Δεν μπορω να καταλαβω πως αυτος ο μηχανισμος θα μπορουσε να δημιουργισει ΑΝΤΙΒΑΡΥΤΗΤΑ η να επιρεασει θετικα η αρνητικα την βαρυτητα, αλλα οποιος θελει να βεβαιωθει θα πρεπει να κανει γυρο απο αυτον η και εντος αυτου τουλαχιστον μετρησεις ατμοσφαιρικης πιεσης.

  • @FullMusicEcho just to be able to read the inside of this mechanism that gravity is reduced or negated, it would be a GREAT start to anti-gravity research.

  • It looks more like an elaborate exotic pendulum... Funny thing about pendulums is they use gravity to work they do not negate gravity.

  • A 3-axis device? That's been done, it's called the gravitron, which has nothing to do with gravity. NASA uses one to train their astronauts.

  • ive messed with an animation program before made somthing exactly like this. its called pivot

  • its like the thing from CONTACT, that somehow fast spherical motions create vortexex or something..

  • greek inventor design this

  • squirrelspown, this "box" dosnt produce antigravity. It only distribute centrifugal and centripetal force on 180 degrees. Antigravity is somthin very different. Antigravity is the opposite of gravity and this also dosnt mean its the same thing as a magnet pole's like North and South wich attract or repel. We know what gravity is but not sure about antigravity what it is or if it even exist... Antigravity still is between the missunderstood terms like: dark matter, dark energy, antimatter

  • this principle does work and i have built the same mechanism and tested it fiew years ago, i could say i had the same ideea so reinventing somethin invented does happen, anyway it works in real and whats funny: its not used to anything this principle. Or maybe it is somewhere someone... :)

  • @AlexandruBogdan81 This mechanism could NEVER produce anti-gravity.  Don't be a dumbass!

  • cool wasted my time again, die fuckwit.

  • you can do anything in animation, build it.

  • η δυο τριαξονικους... θα ηταν πολυ καλυτερο και ο καθενας σε αντιθετη φορα απο αυτη που εχουν...

  • του λειπει κατι... πρεπει να βαλει 3 τριαξονικους αξονες... να λειτουργουν με την ιδια μεθοδο...

  • Very interesting concept.

  • fail

    

  • wow so why does this spinning box thing produce anti gravity?

  • @squirrelspown opposing centrifugal forces, like a gyroscope, and this almost opposes al directions but he is missing an axis

  • @squirrelspown

    not at all i think^^

  • @squirrelspown

    it doesn't

  • @squirrelspown It doesn't.

  • @squirrelspown because of the way the counter weights are spinning one rotation pulls it up while tthe next rotation pulls it down therefore the direction moving never changes so the theory is if u start this in mid air and let go of it it will stay somewhat vibrating in mid-air...hope this helped thanks =)

  • It's the same guy that invented the differential that formula 1 has, and they stole it from him. He makes watches and flying discs!

  • for every action, there is an opposite and equal reaction.

    whether it's spinning or not...

  • Wow that explains everything!

  • kjyytyuty means my shirt is white

  • They have the device upside down it would generate unbalanced oscillation into the ground. Check out "Dean Drive" for a similar idea.

  • Αν καταλαβαίνω καλά, μέσω αυτού του κινηματικού μηχανισμού, οι φυγόκεντρες δυνάμεις των μαζών ασκούνται συνεχώς προς τα πάνω, οπότε προκύπτει συνεχώς μια δύναμη αντιθετη απο το βαρος που μπορει να λειτουργησει προωθητικα. Πανεξυπνο μου φαινεται...

  • take me to your leader!

  • @whotookmynickkokokai fail uncle sam joke!

  • Comment removed

  • he bilt something weird.He doesnt explain anithing, and there it is! an antigravity machine!!!!

  • @demotulation I would have to agree, no explanation given, you could say even a box accelerating threw space is an anti gravity machine.

  • so alot of spinning creates antigravity? lol

  • First check their site THEN make an opinion.

    IaOIWXqH9Io

    As I understand the center of the mass is above the machine when operates!

  • Eric Laithwaite

  • lol. okey. basic knowledge of mechanics anyone?

  • Put your "lol", you known where. Mechanics is open subject. Nature is not described sufficient. THERE IS NOT SUCH THING AS

    "basic knowledge". Every day we learn something. So, better start to learn or to re-learn. Are you able take the challenge?

  • how rude. lol. U are absolutely right about basic knowledge and about us as people who dont know shit about nature and how it works. But this thing is a mechanical device made by humans. And we do know how our own stuff works cause we build it

  • If you know "how stuff works" then why ask for a basic knowledge of mechanics 3 posts earlier? You are trolling nothing more.

  • so i could make fun of this mechanical devise

  • Comment removed

  • well, at least im not lying and being honest with you. I wish those who invented this anti-gravity thing could be honest with you too.

    if there was no lies around the world would flourish.

  • Comment removed

  • well actually no. u do )

  • Comment removed

  • Good Day Shalomsky !

    Are you from the "khazarian Autonomus Oblast:";)

    west from Vladivostock ;)

    just asking!

  • lol. nope. Obninsk, Kalugskaya oblast )

    whats up with u? )

  • So you a Wandering khazarian ?;)

    just asking!

  • lol u retarded? )

    keep asking. it's okey

  • Comment removed

  • Well if you was a woman I would let you play my " "Fiddle" on the roof " ;)

  • Me ..... , Im No-one !

  • Συγχαρητήρια για την ιδέα σας. Ανοίγει νέους ορίζοντες για την εξερεύνηση του διαστήματος με σφραγίδα Ελληνική

  • Poly kalo. Elpizo na min exete provlima me diaforous periergous poy kynigane tis nees idees. Stin asimetria mou fainetai einai to zoumi px. 3 epaliloi konoi me magnites. Kai pali bravo!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more