Recording from 1860. Sound restoration.

[klokerbandicoot]

original, part 1 part 2 was creepy

[kaleidoscopio5]

youu should try to restore brahms cylinders,where he is playing the piano.!!!!!!!

[DieterLo1]

Interesting, how the tried around 150 years ago.

[kqr573v2]

The maker of this device went on to manufacture speaker systems for drive-through restaurants

[kimosabesun]

@kqr573v2

roflmfao

[vampyra123450]

1-creepy

2-is that a violin?

[johneymute]

it,s amezing how to restore such terrible quality into clean audio.

if we just future improve it with stereo panning in echo and normal version and upsample it to 24bit audio for sacd,that would be top of the bill.

[johneymute]

whooooaaaah this is absolutely incredible,it,s just mind blowing,just amezing how it becomes possible to remaster this to such hich quality,by removing noise,hiss,cracks,falsh harmonics.

also this must,ve be very emotional since it was only recorded but never played till now,and recover something wich was hide by noise is just amezing.

now you can even change the keynote and use stereopanning echo to virtualy go back in time and change things up!!!!

[shaneyseano]

the 1st one is better than justin beiber!

[CosmicCaprice]

you did your best to clear her voice, but it was obvious she was just a bad singer.

[ss35523]

@CosmicCaprice It wasn't a woman, it was the inventor singing into it.

[Professor6871]

That is a good restoration there. Next could he or she did the only Queen Victoria one that's in existence?

[Sonicku]

wow professional restorer!

[mj090794]

its good

[KnowledgeAddicted]

creepy

[bullyword]

wow, now i can imagine a singing woman lived before 152 years!

[studentparamedicuk]

The original sounds much better

[hitlersucks101]

amazing!

[treehuggingdruid]

part 5 was dressy effects they should have left out. kind of like overtouching in photoshop. otherwise, interesting.

[Unutilized72]

Wow amazing!!!

[madamerotten]

I have read speculation that Martinville, himself, recorded this, and that the playback speed used by the researchers was too fast, thus creating the mistaken impression that it was recorded by a girl or woman.

[Buccura]

Wow, amazing how much you were able to clear up that recording!

[kaleidoscopio5]

no way,after 152 years,we know what was the singer singing,cool

[tinotrivino]

@kaleidoscopio5 we already knew it since the begining!

[locoparrandero2007]

and I hear another voices back the girl singing

[SOYSOCRATES1]

Wow!!!!

[hockey62946]

omg

[robbo4life]

only 1 small problem the recording was already at double speed but was sung very slowly

[identchannel1]

"Au clair de la lune, mon ami Pierrot, prête-"...

can you restore the Edison's Phonograph Doll? i know the doll sings "Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star" but i want hear it like what you did in the final restoration...

[identchannel1]

WOOOOOW!!!! i cant believe this, you actually restored PERFECTLY and in stereo. YOU'RE GREAT!

[MACA5982]

Fantastic!!!

[MrWWFattitudefan]

wow

[NewDisneySucksHard]

wow..

[Char920onUtube]

wow

[MrTech991]

how did you do this?

[MrTech991]

wow