whats the purpose of this trial ? will it go anywhere ? will the UN get warrants for bush and blairs arrest and trial.....No? nothings been done...what a waste of time...if your going to have a trial then for gods sake go through with its verdict immediatley and do something....actions speak louder than words and all i seem to hear at this trial is words.....sad..patheitc and usless....
What kind of 'academic judge' goes on TV - in an important trial - an compares Bush to Hitler. And yes, poor poor Saddam. He was such a hapless victim ...
@lector0003 Possibly because Bush is in The Order of Death,skull and bones and his grandfather Prescott Bush helped fund the nazi's.Do you Americans get taught any real history?
@lector0003 No Saddam wasn't good and neither were his sons but the US constitution does not give the government the right to declare we are unless attacked. This is part of the reason why the country is going down the crapper from the massive debt accumulated by going to war.
What a farce. A dog and pony show. Was Saddam Hussein an international criminal? No, he was just a fabulous muslim leader, loved by his people... even the millions that he killed.
@thowdy The UK and US launched the invasion of Iraq on the basis that Saddam had WMDs capable of strikes on US and UK soil within 45 minutes. This was a lie, and many many more lives were lost in Iraq due to this and the ten years of embargoes that preceded it. Saddam was a brutal dictator, but he kept some semblance of control. Iraq is now fucked and so dangerous that natives don't even dare to return to renew their passports.
Some "semblance of control?" Yeah, all he did was fight a decade long war with Iran and launched a war against Kuwait, not to mention what he did against the Kurds and the moslems in the south. He ran a brutal, miserable regime.... what a muslim hero he was. And Iraq is so dangerous for one reason: Islamic fighting. Period, end of story. I thought the war was a mistake, but the way the Leftist around the world reacted to it was hideous.
@thowdy But you excuse the UK and US (also the top world arms dealers) for their history of war, colonisation and interference in the politics and economics of other countries? What principle are you arguing for, that it's wrong to impose regimes through violence? Look at the history of the super powers. You need to lose this sports-fan-us-and-them attitude, you'll make more sense of things.
@Valelacerte What regime did the US impose upon Iraq? And after the initial short period when the coalition took out the Saddam dictatorship, all violence was caused by muslim sectarian fighting, as clannish hostilities which were bottled up by Saddam's iron fist were let loose. I won't argue about how wise it was for Bush to think he could both take out Saddam and impose some sort of peace between muslim clans, but I know it wasn't the evil thing that the Islam/Left Alliance made it out to be
@thowdy You're forgetting that the population of Iraq has been suffering from bombings and sanctions since 1990; half a million children were dead by about 1996. The history of the US' involvement in Iraq is filthy: they supported Saddam's actions against Kuwait over a border dispute, as they did for his actions against Iran. When their complicity became a public embarrassment, then they feigned outrage and attacked. The US happily supplied arms and stirred up Sunni-Shia animosity.
@thowdy You're forgetting that the population of Iraq has been suffering from bombings and sanctions since 1990; half a million children were dead by about 1996. The history of the US' involvement in Iraq is filthy: they supported Saddam's actions against Kuwait over a border dispute, as they did for his actions against Iran. When their complicity became a public embarrassment, then they feigned outrage and attacked. The US happily supplied arms and stirred up Sunni-Shia animosity.
these are the same people who thing 911 was planed by bush and we never landed on the moon
thelordsofhope 2 weeks ago
So a make believe court make a make believe ruling and I'm suppose to make believe I care...lol
gollyanamegame 4 weeks ago
I should like to volunteer to be on the firing squad; if I may. Thank you in anticipation.
LukeCoulson 1 month ago
by the way..i beleive bush and blair are indeed war criminals, but i wont hold my breath to see them arrested anytime before 2045...
crazyknight2008 1 month ago
whats the purpose of this trial ? will it go anywhere ? will the UN get warrants for bush and blairs arrest and trial.....No? nothings been done...what a waste of time...if your going to have a trial then for gods sake go through with its verdict immediatley and do something....actions speak louder than words and all i seem to hear at this trial is words.....sad..patheitc and usless....
crazyknight2008 1 month ago
@crazyknight2008 It's a glorified sheep show. Nothing more.
a2zhandi 1 month ago
What kind of 'academic judge' goes on TV - in an important trial - an compares Bush to Hitler. And yes, poor poor Saddam. He was such a hapless victim ...
lector0003 1 month ago
@lector0003 Possibly because Bush is in The Order of Death,skull and bones and his grandfather Prescott Bush helped fund the nazi's.Do you Americans get taught any real history?
2wheels88 1 month ago
@2wheels88 They don't get taught anything unless it's on the idiot box. ie: family guy, simpsons,king of the hill, or cnn or msnbc or ......
a2zhandi 1 month ago
@lector0003 I think his biggest regret was knowing he was conned by bush.
Them bastards, You can't trust any of them.
a2zhandi 1 month ago
@lector0003 No Saddam wasn't good and neither were his sons but the US constitution does not give the government the right to declare we are unless attacked. This is part of the reason why the country is going down the crapper from the massive debt accumulated by going to war.
screwopenborders 1 month ago
What a farce. A dog and pony show. Was Saddam Hussein an international criminal? No, he was just a fabulous muslim leader, loved by his people... even the millions that he killed.
thowdy 2 months ago
@thowdy The UK and US launched the invasion of Iraq on the basis that Saddam had WMDs capable of strikes on US and UK soil within 45 minutes. This was a lie, and many many more lives were lost in Iraq due to this and the ten years of embargoes that preceded it. Saddam was a brutal dictator, but he kept some semblance of control. Iraq is now fucked and so dangerous that natives don't even dare to return to renew their passports.
Valelacerte 2 months ago
Some "semblance of control?" Yeah, all he did was fight a decade long war with Iran and launched a war against Kuwait, not to mention what he did against the Kurds and the moslems in the south. He ran a brutal, miserable regime.... what a muslim hero he was. And Iraq is so dangerous for one reason: Islamic fighting. Period, end of story. I thought the war was a mistake, but the way the Leftist around the world reacted to it was hideous.
thowdy 2 months ago
@thowdy But you excuse the UK and US (also the top world arms dealers) for their history of war, colonisation and interference in the politics and economics of other countries? What principle are you arguing for, that it's wrong to impose regimes through violence? Look at the history of the super powers. You need to lose this sports-fan-us-and-them attitude, you'll make more sense of things.
Valelacerte 2 months ago
@Valelacerte What regime did the US impose upon Iraq? And after the initial short period when the coalition took out the Saddam dictatorship, all violence was caused by muslim sectarian fighting, as clannish hostilities which were bottled up by Saddam's iron fist were let loose. I won't argue about how wise it was for Bush to think he could both take out Saddam and impose some sort of peace between muslim clans, but I know it wasn't the evil thing that the Islam/Left Alliance made it out to be
thowdy 2 months ago
@thowdy You're forgetting that the population of Iraq has been suffering from bombings and sanctions since 1990; half a million children were dead by about 1996. The history of the US' involvement in Iraq is filthy: they supported Saddam's actions against Kuwait over a border dispute, as they did for his actions against Iran. When their complicity became a public embarrassment, then they feigned outrage and attacked. The US happily supplied arms and stirred up Sunni-Shia animosity.
Valelacerte 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thowdy You're forgetting that the population of Iraq has been suffering from bombings and sanctions since 1990; half a million children were dead by about 1996. The history of the US' involvement in Iraq is filthy: they supported Saddam's actions against Kuwait over a border dispute, as they did for his actions against Iran. When their complicity became a public embarrassment, then they feigned outrage and attacked. The US happily supplied arms and stirred up Sunni-Shia animosity.
Valelacerte 2 months ago
@thowdy ohh yes, that entitled to kill 2 Millions innocent iraqi people (including women and children)
El0Bandolero 2 months ago
@El0Bandolero grow up.
Muslim on muslim killing is the reason why Iraq turned into the Shiitehole that it is.
thowdy 2 months ago
@thowdy form an orderly queue now. I can only shoot one cunt at a time.
LukeCoulson 1 month ago
And how about we pull all financial aid to these people? Sounds like a good plan to me.
amybolte 2 months ago
JAIL? Not jail shot, in front of a firing squad for all to see! Long live Communism!
RedMusicSinging 2 months ago
bout fuckin time!!!
garsnic100 2 months ago
ewwww......this video just proves that some people are really really really stupid......and im not talking about Pres. Bush
davecole19 3 months ago