Added: 4 years ago
From: ngingrich
Views: 19,205
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (115)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Oregon, Kentucky SEARCH:

    Say Hello to Michelle Obama

    Obama's Marxist doctrine

    Obama: The wolf

    Are You Smarter than Barack Obama?

    FREE USA will be MARXIST USA!

    GREAT MESMERIZERS: Castro, Che Guevara

    Stalin, Hitler, Tito Fujimori, OBAMA

    I am Black, educated and say NO to BHO !

    Hit SHOW below

  • The TV Queen has DUMPED JESUS.! Oprah's feeling about "the one" IS NOT from the LIGHT OF GOD ! OPRAH is PLAYING KING Maker ! WE WILL HOLD FAST TO THE HAND OF GOD and VOTE OUR CONSCIENCE, not RACE, nor GENDER nor the COMMAND OF A BLASPHEMOUS CELEBRITY ! Search 4 Oprah denies Jesus "A MESSAGE TO MY FRIEND OPRAH WINFREY" Blood on Barack's hands The Man Behind Barack Obama May the Holy Spirit guide us ALL! Click on SHOW
  • You are an elitis, because your PhD you think u r smarter

    The bottom line is we should start getting out of Iraq and we need a clear mission statement to exit Iraq.

    You and the war mongers cannot articulate a clear vision of success or exit strategy.

    WHO ARE U KIDDING?

    WE all know...Iraq is a phoney war!

    God punishes people that promote wars and the killings of innocent people( american forces and innocent Iraquis) You know you could never be right on this issue, I really feel sorry for you

  • BAMBOOZLER ! EXPOSED IN TIME OBAMA IS DONE ! MUST DROP OUT OF THE RACE WE REJECT HIM ! This is a MOVEMENT ! JOIN !! YES WE CAN ! SEARCH: Why NOT to vote for Barack Only The Facts Obama-odinga cousins? He was born a muslim, his father and grandfather were both muslims. Abongo, his half brother, his cousin Raila Odinga, Kenya' s opposition leader, BOTH are marxists and militant MUSLIMS. ( But Barack is not ?) GOOGLE IT ! SEE the HIDDEN TRUTH ! Hit Show below
  • DO NOT TRUST GINGRICH

    Retired Generals Schwarzkopf, Zinni and Hoar have indicated that the "surge" is a short term tactic not a strategy, ALL WERE AGAINST IRAQ WAR:

    A-What happens when the surge is over, Quada will return and begin guerilla tacts. The Iraqui people have to take responsibility for their well being. America Cannot remain in Iraq forever.

    B- Since 12/25/07 there have been 6 suicide bombings in Iraq. Combination of Al Quada, Shia on Sunni, and Shia killing Shia.

  • u are nothing more than another lying politition...and a different verson of the present administration..."FLAKE!" ~DEADMAN~

  • He actually is a family values guy! He was screwing around on his sick wife while impeaching Bill cus he lied about getting a blow job. Newt believes in marriage between 1 man and as many women as he can bed! What a lying bastard!

  • You are dead on Newt.

    John Edwards the trial lawyer with a $400 haircut, ummm yep, that's just what this Country needs. Sheesh!

  • So if it sounds like truth to you....it IS true??? Duh???

  • Truth is always relative term. To me it sounds like true speech. To you it might be different. It is plurality of opinions; this is one element of our beloved Democracy, man. Let it be this way.

    Duh!

  • So you don't really think there is "TRUTH"?

    It's simply whatever to "believe"??

  • I believe exactly in what you believe. Are you happy now?

    Good, whatever makes you happy, man...

  • I envy you your ability to be selectively brain dead!:) PEACE!

  • ...but Newt....what you BELIEVE doesn't make it true!!! hahahahaha

  • to you....but to me it sounds like truth

  • That is a moronic statement! "Truth" doesn't have anything to do with what it "sounds like" to a finite being, such as you are.

  • Mr.Gingrich was the one that led the way for attacking everybody and everything. He was the author along with Karl Rove that made the hate filled attack on political opponents all the rage. Now when it has come back to haunt him and his cronies he is squealing foul. What goes around comes around. He being a History teacher and lover should have realized that in the 90's. They are the ones that turned this process into a hate filled farce.

  • This man doesn't just speak English, he speaks COMMON SENSE.

    I would add that respect for the truth in our Country has progressively diminished ever since the Media gave Florida to Al Gore way before the polls were closed. Instead of apologizing for their failed plan to manipulate an election, the Media turned to Bush-hating, and in the process they throw decency and truthfulness out the window.

  • 100% agree

  • Does he not hear her debate? She rocks every debate..never falters. Everyone knows he doesn't like her...wah wah crybaby.

  • well put Newt. Of course you're not always above it all either.

  • If Newt Gingrich wants to extend the US invasion of Iraq he should go there and volunteer to be a truck/ hummvee convoy driver. It's easy for him to bark like a mad dog about staying in Iraq because he doesn't have to worry about being blown up by a road side bomb

  • seen this already.

  • Destructive huh? LOL!

    ZeitgeistMovie d0t c0m

  • Welcome to the nation of victimologista and ET newsites. The land of personal attacks, and 5 second ping pong sloganism. What discourse? Why not spend time to research local elections; judges, congress, state and city officials, AND the next Pres.? Few will...Myself,

    I really have no idea myself. What do the blogs in China and Iran say?

    What's Britany at? I gotta go now The View is on.

  • Excellent comments. Keep going Newt.

  • Fred Thompson in 2008!!

  • Destructive of thought?

    High technology?

    I could make that 1984 video with the equipment I have as a hobbyist.

    Attack ads on the mainstream media are far worse.

    Gingrich is a tool and a puppet.

  • I've just watch four of Newt's videos and I think the man is right on target. It's a shame he's not president. God know Bush has sold us out.

  • What did Bush do?

  • I have been a U.S. Citizen for 1 month today. I am voting for the only candidate who has a consistant voting record and only votes according to the Constitution. Ron Paul.

  • Ron Paul allows gay marriage.

  • Help us Gingrich-wan Kenobi! You're our only hope!

  • The 1984 ad took me about 2 or 3 minutes to watch. I didn't gossip it, I didn't feel endangered either. it just reiterated that the world is heading toward an Orwellian state, especially with the national ID's being able to track our every movement being enforced in the next couple of years.

    With how uneducated America is, by all means something has to get the message through that we have to stop voting for candidates paid for by lobbyists. I strongly disagree with Newt.

  • why the hell did this get such bad reviews? I'm an independent / moderate democrat and his words are brilliant. The ratings make no sense.

  • Blah! Blah! Blah! Blah!

  • Not even an important issue at all. If they can't learn English they should not work simple, just like the old ways. Why have bisexual education for them if they want to be gay let them be gay.

  • Duncan Hunter in 2008.

  • this guy is one of the smarter minds in politics and the most elegant speaker ive seen in a while. id definitely vote for him

  • i would like newt to run since i'm from georgia and i'm ashame to say jimmy carter is from georgia..its about time georgia gave something good

  • You should go to his website to read about his ideas on just about every issue facing this nation. I believe he will announce his candidacy at the end of Sept. He is so far above anyone else running, and not afraid to speak directly to the people and other candidates. He beats them all on ideas hands down. People have bought into the BS from the MSM about his past, but the truth shows that he cares far more about America than his own political career.

  • He's going to run, and set a standard for the future of campaigning. You should visit his websites. American Solutions is one and Newt is another (both orgs-hint.) He paid for the lib investigative attack on his reputation which rendered a conclusion of: innocent of all wrong-doing. He didn't feel the Am. taxpayer should have to pay for such nonsense. What other politician do you know of that has spent their money when they could spend yours?

  • talking about empty speeches...

  • Newt---YOU'RE DESTRUCTIVE!! Step down!!

  • I'm a Liberal and I fully agree with Newt on this issue. We need more debate and discussion of issues, less character attacks and propaganda.

  • All these conservatives are decrying the current system of parochialism and the diverse and petty interests of the electorate. It's just a thinly veiled contempt for the people they represent, which translates into policy.

  • Newt's not very popular. Obama videos have much greater eye balls. I'm not just talking about the Apple Ad. Sorry McCain or Guliani is going to lose to Obama. America is Incredibly pissed at the establishment, beltway curruption, The War Stupid, and their demand for a universal health care system to rival France or Cuba. For Cheaper than what we're paying now in the GDP

  • this dude tried to impeach clinton for a bj, and now he's complaining about the low tone of politics? how do you say "hypocrite" in spanish?

  • Clinton committed acts that may constitute grounds for an impeachment" by lying under oath in the Jones litigation and obstructing justice by urging Ms. Lewinsky "... to to file an affidavit that the President knew would be false".

  • Clinton rewrote the laws so he could get away with alot of shit...but bush is doing basically the same thing but people want to impeach him... but i support bush for alot of issue and since clinton lied i will under oath of god i will never vote for another liberal

  • Clinton lied? This administration didn't lie about Sadam's aid to Osama? They didn't lie about the WMD's? Boy, what planet are you on?

  • ha i never said what he lied about so before he question me about anything make sure u know what i'm talking about...Clinton said under oath of god :i did not have sexual relation with that woman" and bush did not lie about WMD saddam launched scud missiles at israel during the first gulf war who was not a combant also he gased 1500+ kurds gas...yeah so he didnt have WMD now did he?

  • I knew exactly what you were referring to. Clinton lied about "his lawyer spin on sexual relations" Now, that's so much more important than "human lives" in your world. It is true, most americans can't for themselves. This war is about oil, not terrorism. Try to seek the truth and don't be too proud to say you were mistaken or that your prez lied to you.

  • he hasnt lied...if this war was for oil then why didnt we go into Saudi Arabia to get our oil fields also why is it that we are number 7 in oil contracts in iraq with china being number one so before u ever said he lied u need to back up ur facts and my father is over in iraq so before u ever say anything about human lives make sure they dont have family in a war zone

  • Above all, I will pray that your father, as all who are fighting a lie make it home safely. I have family there too! We didn't go after the Saudis for 2 reasons; 1) they are educated in economics & business @ Harvard & Yale, and could not be manipulated/pimped like sadam was; 2) There is a "quiet" partnership between Arabs and the US oil. Sad but true we were lied to. PS- did you know that the whitehouse flew some Bin Ladin family out of this country on 9/11 & 9/12? Interesting, huh?

  • sure they did and we also didnt land on the moon...grow up why cant you accept that we are not invisible like we were taught to be 1) if this was war for oil why didnt we get our oil feilds back? it has nothing to do with being "educated at harvard and yale" so how does that stop us from getting our oil feidls back if they are educated there? 2)if there is a "partnership between them and us" why are we in iraq for oil which is an arab nation also.

  • Okay Boo-you may want to get a pill for this one: Why you ask? "One word: Oil. The Saudi elites happen to be longtime oil business buddies of the Bush clan,

    Cheney's Halliburton Corporation,and the giant oil companies of our country.". I know it will be hard for you to digest this, but try to be open. I think you can. For some people however, ignorance is bliss!

  • this "partnership between arbas and the US" is bs..u gotta do better than that sorry

  • How did Clinton re-write laws? R-House and R-Senate. They would have to vote on it. President Bush had no over sight. Quit spinning your lies. People do think for them self. We don't march to with the Fascist turn. By the way Pesident Bush change over 800 laws and most of them took some of our Freedoms away. With no over sight.

  • lol omg i didnt mean he actually re-wrtoe the laws...and what freedoms did he take away?

  • According to liberal rhetoric that I've been able to glean amongst the profanity and name-calling which is their only hope of winning an argument, is the outrageous practice of listening in on conversations that they have with people assoc. terrorist org. Plotting attacks against their own country must be an inalienable right (pursuit to happiness?) I'm sure evil Cheney is profitting millions from the millions HB is losing in Iraq. Why aren't libs buying stock since it's so profitable.

  • libs are idiots and how are we losing iraq?

  • I was saying Halley Burton was losing millions in Iraq. I believe the folks fighting this war who say the surge is working aka we are winning. The MSM and the dimwits are totally invested in our defeat, otherwise they will have a very long wait for the WH, and can expect to be ousted out of Congress as well. If Bush lied about WMDs it would have been easier to plant some to be found than to admit faulty intel.

  • i've served 2 tours in iraq and i'm not at libery to say if we have or have not found WMD but he did have them because he gased 1500+ kurds....if thats not WMD i wonder what is

  • He gassed far more than 1,500 actually, and the Coalition has found hundreds of thousands in mass graves -- and Democrats know this fact.

    So essentially, on the topic of WMDs, the center-Democrats' are telling us: We see the gunshots, but there was no gun.

    The left-Democrats are saying: We still don't believe there were any gunshots. This proves there was no gun. Bush did 9/11.

  • Yeah i know what you mean and i know hes gased more than 1500 thats why i put the + next to it and your right

  • Re-Defeat Communism in 2008, Don't vote for a Libtard

  • talk about pie in the sky dreams. you might want to have realistic goals, newt, like ending war or eliminating the national debt. mature political debate? here!? you're nuts.

  • right on! this is great. the democrats have been in power for a few months now and what have they done? attack Bush over the perfectly legal attorney firings, and pose for photo ops.

  • You're obviously not paying attention. Go watch more fox news. get out of political debates cuz you have no basis in reality.

  • ...It was just an ad someone did for fun! And a very good one too! But y is everyone in an up roar now and not about all the other attack ads...if this is even considered one! It was just some guy having some fun!

  • Well said, Newt. Although it was supposed to be a joke, it was still an attack. Which is sad because it discredits all parties involved. I would, for once, like to see people run on the issues, and Americans actually research the candidates, themselves, instead of being lead by clever campaign adds, and misleading 3rd party sound bites from new outlets with agendas.

  • wow. he has the personality of wet sock.

  • it's a joke newt, get over it.

  • oops....if he only KNEW!!!!

  • I met Gingrich...what a load of crap. He signed my book..."to my friend Jeremy" If he only new!!!

  • Check out this New Congress in town animation

  • I fail to understand what this guy's problem is. Since when is showing our support for one canidate over another not covered under the First Amendment? Must be one of those politically correct Republicans that give all conservatives a bad name. That being said, forcing canidates to talk and discuss their views with the American people isn't a bad idea...

  • I agree. It's always okay for a politician to speak out, although the media may not like it, nor the people, but that's what we need if we are going to elect somebody into office. Will we get a person or a wind-up politician? If our government is so terrible, let's find out what we want.

  • Newt, how is the 1984 ad any different than some other hit we see on TV. I think this video did spark dialogue.

    I believe that as long as it gets people talking about the candidates and taking a stand as to why the video was or was not relevant, then it's a healthy start. Better yet, it's an ad that at least wasn't paid for, but made by the people and for the people.

  • The "Vote Dfferent" video isnt an attack ad. It isnt an ad at all. Nobody paid for it, and the person who made it has nothing to do with the Obama campaign.

  • ex Obama staffer.

  • Holy crap, I actually agree with Newt Gingrich about something! (I had written something requiring more thought than this, but I needed more than 500 characters to say what I wanted to say)

  • I don't believe that we need one party, but one government. We have too many professional politicians that base their actions not upon what is best for the people, but what is best for their party. Our country has become obsessed with this, and we have forgotten why we have a government. We need some legislators who can act as a true representative of the people, and who can actually make positive changes for all.

  • Would be nice if we could get good competent people to avctually run for office in this country. Republicans are now dead. Democrats are dying badly, like peewee Herman in Buffy, the Vampire Slayer.

  • I disagree too. Nit

  • I too have to disagree mate... Freedom of speach is here, you'll ether have to get used to it or get out of position. Welcome... To the world. Politics will be politics... But people in America will do what they enjoy...

    The ad is not a step forward nor is it a step back... But then again... Lowering chances of hillary being prez... That may be a step FORWARD (Yes... I am American Scum :D)

  • Dems, you need to do better...

  • i have to admit, i agree with gingrich 100% on this. that 1984 video is very clever but completely meaningless too.

  • yeah...you're talking...you find free speech destructive??? wow...let's go democrats...can they do better????

  • Why do you idiots change the meaning of things? Oh! I know! Because you can't comprehend the meaning. Newt is all about free speech, dumbass. NEGATIVE campaigning is destructive! DUH!

  • there is one thing in there that enables us all to solve problems----FREE SPEECH

  • wogs, 1) I agree on Nat'l Healthcare. My first reaction to it is that Wash DC has proven over and over that its bureaucracy rarely runs anything efficiently. Which is Mr. Gingrich's driving point, Washington is broken and we need new ideas to fix it. 2) It's not that Mr. Gingrich is defending Clinton but that the video doesn't offer any suggestions or constructive critism. In this video's opening credits he states that 1984 is clever but an attack ad nonetheless.

  • I've got to disagree Newt. I think that the "1984" presents us with the darkness of our future if we do not act. When you came to my high school (Chattahoochee) over 10 years ago, you had a plan to reduce the size of the federal government. Now you seem to be lining up alongside Clinton to further enslave us with nationalized healthcare. Your coming to her defense here is just another example of that alliance.

  • "enslave" us with national healthcare? wow. interesting perspective. taking care of everyone in our country is "enslavement" ???

  • National health care is a very bad idea, you socialist retard.

  • When someone takes half your wages what else do you call it? Healthcare is a good with inelastic demand and ever-increasing costs. Forcing people to pay for it is enslavement. Why should I care about my health if you're going to foot the bill?

  • Mr. Gingrich misses the point -- the only reason that the attack ad was necessary is because the echo chamber of TV political punditry anoints an establishment candidate before the people have had a say. But I agree it is a shame that the politics of the future will be fought with images and not words.

  • As long as Karl Rove is being paid by tax dollars to be a White House-based dirty tricks operative with no policy role, how can any member of the Republican party dare to complain about the poisonous atmosphere in politics today?

  • You've just proven Mr. Gingrich's point. Instead of commenting on the topic of the video or offer your own suggestions, you simply made an irrelevant attack concerning the current administration. It's that limited thinking that allows the current state of politics to continue.

  • YouTubers, regardless of your personal political leanings, Mr. Gingrich is speaking on a larger scale than the decisive walls created by the labels of Democrat and/or Republican. He's asking us to think of our Country and not the "surround the wagons" mentality of any one party. Let's challenge our candidates to be more than slick, cut-and-paste videos and give us intelligent answers to intelligent questions.

  • I've seen the youtube commercial

    finnaly someone broke the chains of Fox Mordoch and CNN Warners

    The Add completely ruined the AIPAC money that was spent on clinton.

  • and for some it pointed out that even if Obama is a newbie he can play just as dirty and nasty as any republican, that is really something to brag about.

  • haven't you learned anything about politics they all play dirty in theri minds the ends justifices the means. in the end i really don't care how dirty they are towards each other as long a a good democrat takes office and cleans up allt he mess that the idiot on wheels is gonna leave behind (idiot on wheels = bush)

  • when your right your right : ) here's hoping for a Democrat in the WhiteHouse and a majority in the House and Senate. Your so nice to bush, much nicer then he deserves.

  • Don't you think it's a bit frightening to have one party control everything?

  • Having 1 party in control obvisiously isn't good for the country. I wouldn't hope to see it happen again except Bush and his crew have done so much damage it is going to take 1 party in complete control to accomplish anything in a reasonable amount of time, the country can't wait.

  • And what has this "crew" done for damage? I see none whatsoever.

  • Really? National Debt New Orleans Iraq Signing statements the lowest voter confidence of any President including old tricky Dick and I just woke up and haven't had coffee yet. I understand party loyality but blinders are a requirement.

  • The past is the past and everyone has the right to another chance. Look to the future, not the past.

  • Isn't this like an arsonist complaining about fires?

  • That video wasn't anything like the crap that has come out from both the Dems and Repubs over the last 10 years. That "1984" video was not made by a particular political party either. It was freedom of speech at work. Wanna hear about bad attack ads? what about the swiftboat ads attacking Kerry?

  • Thanks for the video response Pierre.

    Check out my 'Republican Dangers' video for my thoughts about some of the points you raised in your video and this post.

    I agree that '1984' was no worse than any of the other attack ads put out by the two parties. It was probably more clever. But it was still a negative attack ad and not part of any dialogue about solutions, which is what I'm trying to promote.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more