Added: 3 years ago
From: tenacross
Views: 3,083
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • keewl

  • @theteeway thanks

  • I think I found a problem with the logic...or... the way you used it. With this technique you have two available spaces in two rows or columns which the 2 can go so you actually need two numbers that can go there and only two...no more. The only way in which the technique would ever work is if you had the two same numbers that go in the x wing fashion. you used one. There was a possiblity that two other numbers(including the 2) could've gone in one of those positions.

  • No, it doesn't matter how many possible numbers there are for the square as long as you find a row where the 3 (for example) can only go in one of 2 columns and then find another row where the 3 can only go in one of the same 2 columns. So no matter what the

    3's in those 2 columns have to go in those 2 rows.

  • So you can eliminate the 3's anywhere else in those 2 columns, hopefully allowing you to proceed with the puzzle. I hope that makes sense, I tried to illustrate this visually using my fingers in the video.

  • i'm just finishing up a silly little sudoku video :P

  • Looking forward to watching it

  • oh- but it's already up :D

    check it! ha... it's not much :P

  • I have a Shortz sudoku book with a puzzle I found to be unsolvable. It's incredibly frustrating.

  • I've been beat by a few of the "Beware! Very Challenging" puzzles but overall it's great fun.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more