Usually listening to a pure A note through an oscillater signal grinds my head the fuck up, but this sounds strangely 'welcome', like, my ears dont mind that its initially there. Then again, listening to the whole thing does get a bit headachey..
@MrMulegy It IS 432...according to our 3 decimal-place laboratory counter...and Adobe Audition that generated the tone. It is pulsing at infrasonic rates --- perhaps giving the aural illusion of being slightly higher (sinusoidal rises and falls). But, even the oscilloscope shows it to be spot on as a centered 432 Hertz.
I've been doing some basic exploration about the A 432 tuning and am still largely on the fence. I have discovered two things:
1. I like the way it sounds, but perhaps not enough to shun my favorite A 440 music
2. Most interestingly, on every analysis I've done of my singing voice (though none are conclusive) my sung A is not 220 but 215 or 216 hz. The 216 is obvious, but the 215 is closer to what I'd get in equal-tempered C 256. So basically I sing in that ballpark despite a lifetime of A 440.
@dmGuillotine Yes, 216 is, of course, the lower octave of 432. C = 256 Hz is the basic tuning system to obtain 432, 216, etc. No reason to "shun" music played/recorded in A = 440. The sounds have a tendecny to "gel" at best geometric formations, anyway. Still, 432 should be the better tuning to use in general...just more natural, fer sur.
@sonatherapy Why might it be--and this really puzzles me--that after growing up with nothing but A 440, and within less than half a year of even being aware A 432, I should find the formants of my voice to line up so nearly to A 432 / C 256 tuning? I had never analyzed my singing voice until recently, so I have no idea whether this has always been true or if there was an abrupt shift in my pitch memory. My perfect pitch has had recent problems also with this discrepancy. I find it all so odd.
@dmGuillotine Perfectly natural puzzle to contemplate. It has been stated that the DNA of the ear responds best to 432, and that the Pineal Gland resonates best at this frequency. Unquestionably, most opera music was composed/performed at lower tunings...to accomodate the voices of the singers. 440, historically, is a relatively recent tuning dating from WW II. Even "Perfect Pitch" is "relative," within the diatonic system. For example, I can tell you what a pitch IS...but not its exact tuning.
this is absolutely fascinating - incredible - but what are the benefits? what are the harms of non 432? how do we know any of this is real - i want to know more about this - where can i learn more? - peer reviewed papers on this? anything like that? anybody know?
@bennett5058 Google 432 Hertz --- quite a few sites --- a couple organizations. Several perspectives, e.g., 432 is higher octave of 27 (3-cubed)...ta natural, Synergetic resonance, sacred/cosmic number, etc. The DNA of the ear resonates best to 432 --- has been long used as a comfotable tuning among musicians...especially opera singers who strain to add the 440 Hz "edge," 432 feels best with the voice. Also see my book -- SONA: Healing with Wave Front Bioresonance (Chapter on "Pulse Tunings").
I'm curious why the number of "spokes" changed from 16 to 14 in two different water drops...wouldn't they always be the same number at the same frequency? Hmm, perplexing. Unless various different frequencies were being used here?
@TheSilverMeister The only frequency used is 432 Hz. The size of the dish, amount of water, time period of sounding in the water, amplitude, et al determine the patterns that are formed. The idea that "only one" pattern is representative of a frequency --- and its resonant effects in any material --- is incorrect. Change the size of the water dish, its weight and inherent qualities, size of Chladni plate, vibrating diaphragm...its tension, etc., and the patterns will change.
Some are in my SONA book...tunings used in treatments. Others are online...just Google 432 Hertz. I have not compiled a list of such studies, per se. We do know that the DNA of the ear responds best to 432 Hz.
@gkamericoast ...I recommend looking up Jamie Buturff, check out the video "The 432 and Marko Rodin's VBM", he talks about a study done with 432-hz chakra tones.
@gkamericoast If you're on Facebook, look up John Cronen, he's been working with Tibetan bowls for 22 years, and has quite an opinion on why 440-hz music isn't good for us. My understanding is that our chakras are more in tune with A=432-hz tuning. Our throat chakra vibes at 384-hz, which is a G note in the A=432-hz scale. Apparently, there's nothing "harmonious geometrically" about 440-hz. John Stuart Reid has a cymascope and is worth looking up.
@TheRealDerfMan Familiar with Cronen. Good friends with John Reid and Analiese. Know and have used the CymaScope. 432 Hz is the natural tuning --- 3-Cubed at higher octave. We posit that 432 goes with the throat (color Indigo)...384 Hz with the "higher heart" center (color Blue). See the new video just posted, "Aura Protocol (Cymatics)."
@sonatherapy ...coooool... for the record, I've only been looking into this for a few months, so my overall understanding may not be very accurate. Haven't even started really looking into the whole thing with colors. Will check out your other video, thanks!
Over a century of research: healing wave front bioreosnances are found to follow basic harmonic guidelines, i.e., binary, ternary, and triangulations like 432 = 3-cubed to the fourth octave. 440 Hz does not fit the natural resonance matrices of bio-acoustics (is never used by acoustic therapists) - and, in fact, creates a dissonance within the inner ear. 440 tuning is not natural to the vocal cords - produces stress upon the singer. Many online sources - plus books and research papers.
I have not done a video of 360 Hertz. "20 Sonations for Healing" (posted hereon) does have 90 Hz, which is a lower octave. Is there something special about 360?
Images are 432 Hz resonating in a small disc of water. Two different sizes used, each less than half an inch in diameter --- shallow. Patterns determined by (1) size, shape, material density of dish, (2) water amount; (3) frequency range/type of sound wave; (4) amplitude; (5) secondary harmonics; (6) water viscosity, etc. Water also becomes "entrained." No Chladni box here. No "set" formations except with a CymaScope. Water's different from sand, but you are "seeing" 432 Hertz Synergetics.
can someone please explaine me why do they all look different? Is it because of different machines/materials used and is the pattern also dependent of the shape & size of the chladni-box used?
Usually listening to a pure A note through an oscillater signal grinds my head the fuck up, but this sounds strangely 'welcome', like, my ears dont mind that its initially there. Then again, listening to the whole thing does get a bit headachey..
WeIsDaTyrantz 5 hours ago
I hear 435 Hz here...
MrMulegy 2 weeks ago
@MrMulegy It IS 432...according to our 3 decimal-place laboratory counter...and Adobe Audition that generated the tone. It is pulsing at infrasonic rates --- perhaps giving the aural illusion of being slightly higher (sinusoidal rises and falls). But, even the oscilloscope shows it to be spot on as a centered 432 Hertz.
sonatherapy 2 weeks ago
@sonatherapy You are right, on another laptop it sounds exactly 432 Hz. Interesting...
MrMulegy 2 weeks ago
The "DNA of the ear" can you explain this? How exactly have you been measuring the resonance of DNA and the resonance of ones pineal?
nightspore666 2 weeks ago
@SteveFalconer1 That's gtreat, Steve. So, your D should be around 288 Hz, right?
sonatherapy 3 weeks ago
Tested my didgeridoo today and it sings a D when my vibrational tuner is set to 432.
I tune my steel string acoustic to A = 432 then tune the other strings off the A. I just love the resonate sound, so soothing :D
RhetoricalSyndicate 3 weeks ago
I've been doing some basic exploration about the A 432 tuning and am still largely on the fence. I have discovered two things:
1. I like the way it sounds, but perhaps not enough to shun my favorite A 440 music
2. Most interestingly, on every analysis I've done of my singing voice (though none are conclusive) my sung A is not 220 but 215 or 216 hz. The 216 is obvious, but the 215 is closer to what I'd get in equal-tempered C 256. So basically I sing in that ballpark despite a lifetime of A 440.
dmGuillotine 1 month ago
@dmGuillotine Yes, 216 is, of course, the lower octave of 432. C = 256 Hz is the basic tuning system to obtain 432, 216, etc. No reason to "shun" music played/recorded in A = 440. The sounds have a tendecny to "gel" at best geometric formations, anyway. Still, 432 should be the better tuning to use in general...just more natural, fer sur.
sonatherapy 1 month ago
@sonatherapy Why might it be--and this really puzzles me--that after growing up with nothing but A 440, and within less than half a year of even being aware A 432, I should find the formants of my voice to line up so nearly to A 432 / C 256 tuning? I had never analyzed my singing voice until recently, so I have no idea whether this has always been true or if there was an abrupt shift in my pitch memory. My perfect pitch has had recent problems also with this discrepancy. I find it all so odd.
dmGuillotine 1 month ago
@dmGuillotine Perfectly natural puzzle to contemplate. It has been stated that the DNA of the ear responds best to 432, and that the Pineal Gland resonates best at this frequency. Unquestionably, most opera music was composed/performed at lower tunings...to accomodate the voices of the singers. 440, historically, is a relatively recent tuning dating from WW II. Even "Perfect Pitch" is "relative," within the diatonic system. For example, I can tell you what a pitch IS...but not its exact tuning.
sonatherapy 1 month ago
this is absolutely fascinating - incredible - but what are the benefits? what are the harms of non 432? how do we know any of this is real - i want to know more about this - where can i learn more? - peer reviewed papers on this? anything like that? anybody know?
bennett5058 1 month ago
@bennett5058 Google 432 Hertz --- quite a few sites --- a couple organizations. Several perspectives, e.g., 432 is higher octave of 27 (3-cubed)...ta natural, Synergetic resonance, sacred/cosmic number, etc. The DNA of the ear resonates best to 432 --- has been long used as a comfotable tuning among musicians...especially opera singers who strain to add the 440 Hz "edge," 432 feels best with the voice. Also see my book -- SONA: Healing with Wave Front Bioresonance (Chapter on "Pulse Tunings").
sonatherapy 1 month ago
@sonatherapy I can feel the vibrational euphoria. Thanks for putting this up Doctor spock!
Anarchyson1 1 week ago
I'm curious why the number of "spokes" changed from 16 to 14 in two different water drops...wouldn't they always be the same number at the same frequency? Hmm, perplexing. Unless various different frequencies were being used here?
TheSilverMeister 2 months ago
@TheSilverMeister The only frequency used is 432 Hz. The size of the dish, amount of water, time period of sounding in the water, amplitude, et al determine the patterns that are formed. The idea that "only one" pattern is representative of a frequency --- and its resonant effects in any material --- is incorrect. Change the size of the water dish, its weight and inherent qualities, size of Chladni plate, vibrating diaphragm...its tension, etc., and the patterns will change.
sonatherapy 2 months ago 2
Some are in my SONA book...tunings used in treatments. Others are online...just Google 432 Hertz. I have not compiled a list of such studies, per se. We do know that the DNA of the ear responds best to 432 Hz.
sonatherapy 2 months ago
Can you show me the case studies you mention or refer me to them?
gkamericoast 2 months ago
@gkamericoast ...I recommend looking up Jamie Buturff, check out the video "The 432 and Marko Rodin's VBM", he talks about a study done with 432-hz chakra tones.
TheRealDerfMan 2 months ago
@TheRealDerfMan Will do! Thanks!
gkamericoast 2 months ago
what is the worse case scenario of listening to everything at 440 Hz really? Be straight with me please. I am very interested to know. Thanks!
gkamericoast 2 months ago
@gkamericoast If you're on Facebook, look up John Cronen, he's been working with Tibetan bowls for 22 years, and has quite an opinion on why 440-hz music isn't good for us. My understanding is that our chakras are more in tune with A=432-hz tuning. Our throat chakra vibes at 384-hz, which is a G note in the A=432-hz scale. Apparently, there's nothing "harmonious geometrically" about 440-hz. John Stuart Reid has a cymascope and is worth looking up.
AGAIN: only my understanding... ;)
TheRealDerfMan 2 months ago
@TheRealDerfMan Familiar with Cronen. Good friends with John Reid and Analiese. Know and have used the CymaScope. 432 Hz is the natural tuning --- 3-Cubed at higher octave. We posit that 432 goes with the throat (color Indigo)...384 Hz with the "higher heart" center (color Blue). See the new video just posted, "Aura Protocol (Cymatics)."
sonatherapy 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@sonatherapy ...coooool... for the record, I've only been looking into this for a few months, so my overall understanding may not be very accurate. Haven't even started really looking into the whole thing with colors. Will check out your other video, thanks!
TheRealDerfMan 2 months ago
@TheRealDerfMan that's very interesting! I will check out all those referrals / sources. much appreciated!!
gkamericoast 2 months ago
amazing!! Thank you!
nadinesnoopy 3 months ago
Over a century of research: healing wave front bioreosnances are found to follow basic harmonic guidelines, i.e., binary, ternary, and triangulations like 432 = 3-cubed to the fourth octave. 440 Hz does not fit the natural resonance matrices of bio-acoustics (is never used by acoustic therapists) - and, in fact, creates a dissonance within the inner ear. 440 tuning is not natural to the vocal cords - produces stress upon the singer. Many online sources - plus books and research papers.
sonatherapy 3 months ago
what are the harmful effects of 440 hz?
markitymark90 3 months ago
@markitymark90 No harmful effects, per se. 99.9% of music IS at A = 440 Hz. Benefits could be obtained if the A = 432 Hz were the norm.
sonatherapy 2 months ago 2
I have not done a video of 360 Hertz. "20 Sonations for Healing" (posted hereon) does have 90 Hz, which is a lower octave. Is there something special about 360?
sonatherapy 4 months ago
i would love to see a cymatic visualization of 360 hertz...would that be possible?
alchemikey 4 months ago
uff, esto si que es relajante¡
imix73 4 months ago
Images are 432 Hz resonating in a small disc of water. Two different sizes used, each less than half an inch in diameter --- shallow. Patterns determined by (1) size, shape, material density of dish, (2) water amount; (3) frequency range/type of sound wave; (4) amplitude; (5) secondary harmonics; (6) water viscosity, etc. Water also becomes "entrained." No Chladni box here. No "set" formations except with a CymaScope. Water's different from sand, but you are "seeing" 432 Hertz Synergetics.
sonatherapy 4 months ago
can someone please explaine me why do they all look different? Is it because of different machines/materials used and is the pattern also dependent of the shape & size of the chladni-box used?
PhaseLU 4 months ago
♥(--..--)♥Figh as Huck~ Inlakech Namaste♥«´¨`•°432hz* °•´¨`»♥
ShamanicSoundz 4 months ago
yay...so happy to have another visual of 432 online. Don't forget to join "The Cosmic 432" on Facebook.
see ya there.
covellz 4 months ago
This is corresponding with the Schumann frequency
valoski1 4 months ago
Thank you !
wonderfulight 4 months ago