RROD is mostly a problem with the PCB the GPU sits on coming unsoldered, not necessarily the GPU itself. and hopefully ATI would fix the problem if it really was the GPU only.
@rapps143 That's just ridicilous.The Ati card in Xbox360 is from the 3000 series and now we are in 5000 series.Besides Xbox360 doesnt get red ring's anymore.
@M1KENDO not the same, better! lol eyefinity is AMD's gimmick, their cards would have more potential if ATI stream would pick up in the market, like CUDA. since ATI cards have SO MUCH more potential power.
It's simple, if you want raw power and DX11, get the 5870...
if you want to play games in 3D, and have DX11 (and possibly better performance) then wait to see what Nvidia has to offer.
besides Nvidia says that their DX11 card will also cut down the work of the CPU by offloading it onto the GPU, becoming a GPU/CPU, and giving you better performance, so it may end up destroying this card...We'll have to wait and see. :-)
I'm not saying it will, but it's very possible, based on what they said.
take down Nvidia? lol, yeah take them down, and just have ATI, and don't play games in 3D, and have shitty deals on video cards, because of no competition, makes sense yeah...
don't be a fan boy, they both make amazing cards, but Nvidia offers something ATI doesn't. Which makes me lean towards Nvidia, AND Nvidia has said their card will easily beat the 5870 when it's released, so who wins then?
You know, this card was the first confirmed to support Direct X 11, nvidia said there GTX 285 and 295 now also work with DX 11 now also. But here's the thing I see, Nvidia still uses GDDR3 in every single one of there cards, and ATI uses GDDR5 which runs it's memory faster to the processor to calculate more graphics on your screen. ATI has always won the war despite what PC magazines say, ATI still has the only cards with GDDR5 memory.
nvidias 285 bus width is 2x bigger, 512bit compared to ATIs 4890 256bit on the last generation cards, making nvidias 285 pulling ~ 160gb/s bandwidth compared to the 4890s ~ 125gb/s, thats over 35gb/s faster, memory speed isnt the only thing to account for dumbass
Not only can this GPU put out some serious fps during games. I bet it can do some serious folding as well. I need one of these that's for sure. I won't pay $379 for it. I will wait till it is $179 like my 4870.
Sorry but you need to check the hardwire review sites, the single 5870 is in some bench even faster and sometimes a bit slower and its only a single Gpu the 295 is Double Gpu on 1 printboard.
Also this 5870 usses way less power then the 295 so next time dont talk crap first check the review websites.
you ATI fans are fucked in the head, Nvidia brings much more to the table, it's called "3D Vision" letting you play games in 3D, and I'm giving Nvidia the benefit of the doubt, when they say their DX11 card will beat the 5870. IMHO it's a much better deal going with Nvidia's card, NOT the cards they have now, but the DX11 card they will be releasing.
I lol'd. It's just 3D glasses. There is nothing to it. I know your mad that your NVIDIA was beaten to DX11 and they are still struggling on their prototype but there is no need to take it out on NVIDIA's competition. Performing operations of the CPU on the GPU makes the GPU slower. Remember, when it comes to gaming the GPU plays an important role. More important than the CPU unless the game is CPU intense, say a simulation. You can use this Dx11 as a CPU as well so there is nothing different.
lol what are you talking about "It's just 3D Glasses" please explain what you mean by this....thank you
and also, don't think you understand EXACTLY what it means to have a GPU capable of taking on CPU work... it could be done in a way that doesn't negate system performance, we don't know yet. we'll have to wait and see.
I'm giving Nvidia the benefit of the doubt that when they say their DX11 will be more powerful than the 5870. Again, we'll have to wait and see of course.
You would be referring to AMD Fusion then. A CPU merged with the GPU. It's rather useless in a gaming perspective. Having code run on a GPU will bring negative performance much in the way PhysX causes slower GPU performs but eases the CPU's load so it can process the program faster. There is still a negative decrease in performance. The only way to not have a decrease in GPU performance is to have the code running on a seperate area of the GPU. IE: Fusion. Yes, it's useless 3D glasses.
It's a second-rate technology that halves the frame rate of your game in order to generate two different images. One for each eye. This creates an illusion of 3D. Overall it isn't that impressive.
No, I jumped off the NVIDIA train a while back and I don't see anything fascinating about 3D. It's just something to rake some extra cash in. It's rather expensive and isn't all that important. It's kind of like having multiple speakers surrounding you. An enthusiast effect that matters little but costs a lot. When you see AMD/ATI you think price to performance. The goal is to get the best performance with the least money.
see you haven't even tried it, what a joke, I'm telling you man, its AMAZING, it's not like a cheap looking 3D, it ACTUALLY looks VERY GOOD.
anyways, don't matter much to me if you like it, it's your loss, lol
but just because YOU dont find value in it, doesnt mean it isnt valuable to many people, this is why Nvidia's cards cost more. their not going to lower the price of the cards simply because of bunch of people dont understand the value of the cards. and have never even bothered to try it.
1981, you're just another fanboy who needs to stop smoking pot.
If AMD is snatching alot of ground from Nvidia, offering better products for the money, having a more generous attitude towards their technologies then isn't it Nvidia doing the wrong stuff here? Ofcourse people will not find value in an more expensive videocard which only performs a few percent better.
3D Vision is a boring gimmick until the technology would spread to all manufactors and hardware.
lol, I'm not a fanboy, I'd punch old ladies, and babies to get the 5870 if it offered 3D Vision.
but it doesn't, you obviously have not even tried it, otherwise you would not be saying it's a gimmick, pretty much every person that has tried it, has said it's amazing.
and I have tried it, and I will NEVER go back to playing the games I use to, even with using the crappy red & blue glasses (until I get the proper kit to do it right)
even now, I'd rather play the game in 3D with crappy color.
that's how good it is, that I would deal with having shitty color to have 3D, and then when I get the kit, it will be perfect color in 3D.
it's really one of those things that most people (even I) have thought before trying it that it's probably not that great, and that it would be a half ass effect, but really it's not.
ther'es nothing wrong with liking Nvidia, and there's nothing wrong with liking ATI, sometimes ATI is better, they are for performance right now, but it's different for me.
Stop smoking pot. How does this 3D crap perform better in displaying colors?
How is it different for you with the acceptance of liking one brand over another? You're just another 12-year old fanboy. You don't bring any arguments, you don't have the least of research and you simply have lots of emotion over a brand, which makes your ideas of the brand turn out to be of a religion than a materialistic matter. Which is simply sickening.
your a fucktard, I was saying that when you view the 3D with red & blue glasses the color isn't very good, and when your using the proper kit, you get 3D, and perfect color (as appose to having shitty color with the red & blue glasses)
ATI is just fine, I'm not a fanboy, if ATI offered a proper 3D enabled video card, I would probably get an ATI card, but they don't, and being 3D creates a HUGE dif. in immersion, it's worth it to me, to go with Nvidia, because they offer it, it's that simple.
please don't be like everyone I have fucking talked to that says 3D gaming is shit, and just a bunch of hype, everyone I have talked to has said that, and then surprise surprise they haven't even fucking tried it!
how can they form an opinion on something they haven't even tried?
seriously, youtube is fucking full of people that have an opinion about something they know FUCK ALL about.
it's so fucking stupid too, EVERYONE that argues with me about 3D Gaming, has NOT even fucking tried 3D gaming, notice how NO ONE that has ACTUALLY tried 3D Gaming argues with me? because they agree with me that it's amazing.
its always stupid 15 year olds that think they are geniuses that havent even tried it, have an opinion, its like forming an opinion on a movie, you haven't even fucken seen.
"Yes this movie sucked, even tho I didn't even see it, I'm a genius, I know the meaning of life"
Why the fuck do you waste your time here, 1981? Nobody gives a fuck about the 3D Vision as it's an boring GIMMICK until it develops to a technology that makes sense without having to buy surprisingly expensive, crappy monitors and and run Nvidias laughable videocard adapters.
Seeing how the 3D Vision isn't really any sort of hot item on Nvidias selling records sort of speaks for the industry not giving more of a shit for boring gimmicks than anyone else around here.
lol, anyways, your STILL speaking from no experience, how can you say it's a gimmick, you haven't even tried it. WHAT A JOKE.
and also the monitor is not a crappy monitor. if not used for 3D, it at least makes for a very good gaming monitor.
anyways, I'm done arguing with fucking idiots like yourself, your the fucking fan boy here. while I have no problem buying ATI cards, I will even admit their 5870 is very fast and worth the money, IF you don't want 3D gaming.
You're coming here on AMDs official YouTube channel and jerk off with the 3d Vision crap nobody could care less about. You're basicly the one starting all this.
Take your shit somewhere else. Nobody cares about 3D Vision, period.
haha this actually makes me laugh, because your the one that's missing out on a whole new level of gameplay, omg, I wish I could see your face when you find out what you have been missing, hahahahahahahaha fucking hilarious!
Fail. The game still plays the same, the visual representation is what differs. Nobody cares about 3D Vision as it doesn't justify a $400-500 pricetag for a crappy monitor and some labeled Nvidia crap. And looking how the 3D Vision isn't selling or even making the least of fuzz, maybe it's just You who portrait it to be more of a deal than the rest of the industry thinks it is.
yeah well, if you were to take a look at some ppls vids about 3D Vision, & read some FUCKING comments from people, you would know how good it is.
do you understand what a review it? Do you understand people form opinions upon the integration of new information and their brain, not bullshit "beliefs" of what they "Think" it is like, based on nothing. otherwise I could just sit here and be like
"Duck tastes like shit, I've never tried it but it tastes like shit, I should know, I never tried it"
lol, yeah I'm the stupid one because I actually try things before talking negative about it, or at least investigate it to find out what people think about. Right.....
Efco88 has a Crysis-5870 gameplay on max settings with 8x aa. He averages around 40 fps, the card is a beast....And Nvidia fanboiz are loosing their minds.
and what the fuck is wrong with you? I believe I started talking about this, by making a simple comment about how Nvidia has 3D Vision, and you take it as some personal attack on you...
so what, what's wrong with admitting Nvidia has a good feature, just because YOU personally don't like it, doesn't mean it's junk,and that Nvidia sucks.
Nvidia makes amazing cards, and so does ATI, Nvidia offers something ATI doesn't, and ATI offers something Nvidia doesn't at the present time, DX11.
lol, I give GOOD reasons to get an Nvidia card, WITHOUT saying ATI is shit, and that both are good companies, and I tell people that if they want 3D get Nvidia, if they want Performance get the 5870, now what's wrong with that? I'm not being a retard, and just saying "ATI sucks!!!"
so why the hostility? I will recommend ATI to one person, and Nvidia to another, not like I'm hardcore ONLY NVIDIA.
Who knows, my next purchase may be ATI, but that depends, as I can't see into the future.
If you think 3D design think quadro, Im an ATI/ AMD fan, but i have to give to NVIDIA, the Quadro cards are insane, Fire Gls are also good, but not that good, now for gaming, ATI rocks, its cheap, really good quality, FAST, comparing that to NVIDIA; well its fast, but freaking expensive, so they are really compared
Usually ATI cards have better effects ( due to the driver options ) while NVIDIA cards priorizes performance, or at least thats what i heard lol.
The only advantage of nvidia by now seems to be the PhysX, but still ATI cards are cheaper so they make for it. The problem of NVIDIA to me is that its too much advertising...
But well, about buying a NVIDIA/ATI card it depends on the price range you wanna expend and how much is it in where you can get, but both will satisfy n1
the advantages of the Nvidia cards would be Physx, and 3D Vision, with great performance. ATI right now offers DX11 of course, but really to me 3D gaming is more important, and I'm not talking about 3D how most people see 3D, most people when I say 3D they say...
"Dude, every game has been 3D since like Doom 1"
but they don't understand what REAL 3D is like.
most people know fuck all about it, and think they know everything about it.
at least I will say ATI is good, your just like "Egh egh egh, fucking Nvidia sucks, Nvidia blows, if someone gave me an Nvidia card, I'd piss on it, egh egh egh"
egh = the sound retards and ignorant fucks make.
am I the only person that thinks it's stupid for someone to have a negative opinion on something they haven't even tried?
go fucking try it, THEN come back and comment, until then shut the fuck up.
"Fuck being immersed in games, I want to play games at 120 fps!!"
a rate TWICE as high, the eye can't even detect.
I agree you need performance, like I don't expect ANYONE to play a game at 20 fps in 3D, lol
but at the same time, you wanna be immersed in your game and have performance, if it means playing a game at 80 fps and be thoroughly immersed, it's worth it, and HIGHLY playable at 80 fps, and then when you don't want 3D on, the FPS goes up.
From what I have read it is nothing much than another 3D solution. It's well put together so it is easier for beginners to function but if I wanted 3D I could go for the Zalman solution and still keep my ATI Radeon 4870. But I still have no interests in 3D.
The only thing I dislike about the eyefinity is the monitors. If there was ever a removable frames for monitors, the eyefinity would look simply amazing without having the monitor frames in your way, other then that, it's pretty cool.
Great peice of hardware though i am going to get myself the 5850 the 5870 is a bit out of my price range :( but its only a difference of a few frames and when newer drivers come out we will see more performance out of these :D
it's competing with gtx 295 and 4870 x2 even AMD will stop producing X2 cause this one 5870 has the same performance but with a single GPU with addition the support of DX 11 .. it' incredible really
Nah ive used 3 cases with this card, and all my friends and ive read quite a bit on the forums. Its only the original ATi and older sapphire coolers that do it. I have a 2nd one in crossfire and it uses the new sapphire coolers, which idle at 50~ :)
im only worried about the Heating Problems that besieged this card, even my xbox 360 graphics was made by ATI and i have the dreaded red ring!
rapps143 2 years ago
RROD is mostly a problem with the PCB the GPU sits on coming unsoldered, not necessarily the GPU itself. and hopefully ATI would fix the problem if it really was the GPU only.
divinityzoo 2 years ago
@rapps143 That's just ridicilous.The Ati card in Xbox360 is from the 3000 series and now we are in 5000 series.Besides Xbox360 doesnt get red ring's anymore.
32JSE 2 years ago
@32JSE well, it's not actually from any series, it's specifically designed for the xbox, and its more comparable to an HD 2900 or nvidia 7800 GTX
masterchief3k 2 years ago
It's based on the 3000 series said by Ati themselve's.
32JSE 2 years ago
@rapps143 The 5870 stays cool as ever mines on full load at 30% fan stays at 60 C thats at 30% fans!!!
Amazing don't hesitate, enjoy a 5xxx series card asap!
ZR0SuM 1 year ago
i think
amd /ati had to best graphices card
but , only the 5000 er series
MrTobi103 2 years ago
0:19 fuck me, why not just buy a 42" LCD or 32" its the same
M1KENDO 2 years ago
Ah... why not buy 3 42" and connect it all together :D
WatchedProductions 2 years ago
why not buy a proyetor
M1KENDO 2 years ago
screens are clearer :D
WatchedProductions 2 years ago
@M1KENDO not the same, better! lol eyefinity is AMD's gimmick, their cards would have more potential if ATI stream would pick up in the market, like CUDA. since ATI cards have SO MUCH more potential power.
masterchief3k 2 years ago
@masterchief3k Well sorry for you, you enjoy your wait Im gonna continue to Enjoy the Power of My 5870!
Woot Woot to the 58XX & 57XX Series!
ZR0SuM 1 year ago
Very good move, AMD. Very good move. No answer from Nvidia as we speak.
Atheismrulez 2 years ago
ATI FTW!!
Simple as that...
ThaleSakano 2 years ago 3
yea and they 4got 2 write "shity drivers" and "no optimization 4 games"
...i am Ati user, not GF fan.
strelok1988 2 years ago
Aren't all drivers on first release like that?
mmstick 2 years ago
It's simple, if you want raw power and DX11, get the 5870...
if you want to play games in 3D, and have DX11 (and possibly better performance) then wait to see what Nvidia has to offer.
besides Nvidia says that their DX11 card will also cut down the work of the CPU by offloading it onto the GPU, becoming a GPU/CPU, and giving you better performance, so it may end up destroying this card...We'll have to wait and see. :-)
I'm not saying it will, but it's very possible, based on what they said.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
Good Job ATI!
The ATI brand was suffering by brand-image side a cool marketing policy!
Keep on advertising!
And nice job for the last products and innovations!
Take down Nvidia!
TheMash84 2 years ago
take down Nvidia? lol, yeah take them down, and just have ATI, and don't play games in 3D, and have shitty deals on video cards, because of no competition, makes sense yeah...
don't be a fan boy, they both make amazing cards, but Nvidia offers something ATI doesn't. Which makes me lean towards Nvidia, AND Nvidia has said their card will easily beat the 5870 when it's released, so who wins then?
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
ATI rocks! nVidia is in trouble. GDDR5 is unreal speed for any graphics card.
wickedout2010 2 years ago
00:18 omg name of monitor please :) thanks
AsimisterMT
AsimisterMT 2 years ago
They are just normal monitors rotated...
Look for monitors with this feature.
TheMash84 2 years ago
ATI strikes back ;)
Floopy41 2 years ago
Its finally HERE!!!...
Go AMD/ATI...
You are the Best!
sourjerer 2 years ago
Holy Crap That Card Is Huge! I Wonder If I Can Fit It Into My Next Gaming Rig??? Either Way I'll Always Choose ATI Over nVidia!!! GO RED TEAM!!!
NorthwindKazeTora 2 years ago
You know, this card was the first confirmed to support Direct X 11, nvidia said there GTX 285 and 295 now also work with DX 11 now also. But here's the thing I see, Nvidia still uses GDDR3 in every single one of there cards, and ATI uses GDDR5 which runs it's memory faster to the processor to calculate more graphics on your screen. ATI has always won the war despite what PC magazines say, ATI still has the only cards with GDDR5 memory.
ViciousDave4Life 2 years ago
nvidias 285 bus width is 2x bigger, 512bit compared to ATIs 4890 256bit on the last generation cards, making nvidias 285 pulling ~ 160gb/s bandwidth compared to the 4890s ~ 125gb/s, thats over 35gb/s faster, memory speed isnt the only thing to account for dumbass
Rustheredfox 2 years ago
how much will this cost? I was'nt even finished saving money for the 4890 due to lots of great games coming out lately.
:-( ... QQ
czdesigns 2 years ago
$380 it is on newegg now
chrismon1001 2 years ago
wow... that will surely hurt my pocket. :-( well, maybe it's a good thing that 'assassins creed 2' got pushed to 2010 then. :-(
czdesigns 2 years ago
how much money?
Intelpentium54321 2 years ago
I'd like to see some legit hardware specs please!
lmayes33 2 years ago
i dont have the cash to buy this one.. fuck!
rapps143 2 years ago
hey hey games look like crysis on max :o
mozart116 2 years ago
Not only can this GPU put out some serious fps during games. I bet it can do some serious folding as well. I need one of these that's for sure. I won't pay $379 for it. I will wait till it is $179 like my 4870.
kodemunke 2 years ago
i can't compare this new ATi card is for good viewing graphic not performance like the GTX 295
PlayNChilll 2 years ago
Sorry but you need to check the hardwire review sites, the single 5870 is in some bench even faster and sometimes a bit slower and its only a single Gpu the 295 is Double Gpu on 1 printboard.
Also this 5870 usses way less power then the 295 so next time dont talk crap first check the review websites.
3dkiller 2 years ago
What about the Radeon 4870x2? That's one card with two GPUs also.
ViciousDave4Life 2 years ago
depends on wich game you are playing they are both fast , the new 5870 usses less power also feutures new stuff like direcxt11 and more.
3dkiller 2 years ago
"the game has changed"
no it has not. NVIDIA is gonna own ur ass sooner or later =D
chaosrealm93 2 years ago
More like later. All nVidia wants to do these days is rerelease the same card and put a new sticker on it.
MyNameIsBucket 2 years ago 6
and if that doesnt work out, then make game developers "optimize" the games for them.
chaosrealm93 2 years ago
@MyNameIsBucket omg that a epic saying were did u hear that
wingscancer 1 year ago
Oh, yeah? Well over in December they'll bring a clumsy solution performing a few percent better with double the price-tag.
Nvidia haven't done anything good since 8-series. So why do people still portrait them as anything less slow than they are?
BorkaBonum 2 years ago
"Nvidia haven't done anything good since 8-series"
truer words have never been spoken. And they just love to overcharge. Its sickening.
kif868 2 years ago
you ATI fans are fucked in the head, Nvidia brings much more to the table, it's called "3D Vision" letting you play games in 3D, and I'm giving Nvidia the benefit of the doubt, when they say their DX11 card will beat the 5870. IMHO it's a much better deal going with Nvidia's card, NOT the cards they have now, but the DX11 card they will be releasing.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
I lol'd. It's just 3D glasses. There is nothing to it. I know your mad that your NVIDIA was beaten to DX11 and they are still struggling on their prototype but there is no need to take it out on NVIDIA's competition. Performing operations of the CPU on the GPU makes the GPU slower. Remember, when it comes to gaming the GPU plays an important role. More important than the CPU unless the game is CPU intense, say a simulation. You can use this Dx11 as a CPU as well so there is nothing different.
mmstick 2 years ago
lol what are you talking about "It's just 3D Glasses" please explain what you mean by this....thank you
and also, don't think you understand EXACTLY what it means to have a GPU capable of taking on CPU work... it could be done in a way that doesn't negate system performance, we don't know yet. we'll have to wait and see.
I'm giving Nvidia the benefit of the doubt that when they say their DX11 will be more powerful than the 5870. Again, we'll have to wait and see of course.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
You would be referring to AMD Fusion then. A CPU merged with the GPU. It's rather useless in a gaming perspective. Having code run on a GPU will bring negative performance much in the way PhysX causes slower GPU performs but eases the CPU's load so it can process the program faster. There is still a negative decrease in performance. The only way to not have a decrease in GPU performance is to have the code running on a seperate area of the GPU. IE: Fusion. Yes, it's useless 3D glasses.
mmstick 2 years ago
useless 3D glasses? what ones are you talking about? could you explain what they look like? thnx
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
It's a second-rate technology that halves the frame rate of your game in order to generate two different images. One for each eye. This creates an illusion of 3D. Overall it isn't that impressive.
mmstick 2 years ago
have you tried it?
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
No, I jumped off the NVIDIA train a while back and I don't see anything fascinating about 3D. It's just something to rake some extra cash in. It's rather expensive and isn't all that important. It's kind of like having multiple speakers surrounding you. An enthusiast effect that matters little but costs a lot. When you see AMD/ATI you think price to performance. The goal is to get the best performance with the least money.
mmstick 2 years ago
see you haven't even tried it, what a joke, I'm telling you man, its AMAZING, it's not like a cheap looking 3D, it ACTUALLY looks VERY GOOD.
anyways, don't matter much to me if you like it, it's your loss, lol
but just because YOU dont find value in it, doesnt mean it isnt valuable to many people, this is why Nvidia's cards cost more. their not going to lower the price of the cards simply because of bunch of people dont understand the value of the cards. and have never even bothered to try it.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
1981, you're just another fanboy who needs to stop smoking pot.
If AMD is snatching alot of ground from Nvidia, offering better products for the money, having a more generous attitude towards their technologies then isn't it Nvidia doing the wrong stuff here? Ofcourse people will not find value in an more expensive videocard which only performs a few percent better.
3D Vision is a boring gimmick until the technology would spread to all manufactors and hardware.
BorkaBonum 2 years ago
lol, I'm not a fanboy, I'd punch old ladies, and babies to get the 5870 if it offered 3D Vision.
but it doesn't, you obviously have not even tried it, otherwise you would not be saying it's a gimmick, pretty much every person that has tried it, has said it's amazing.
and I have tried it, and I will NEVER go back to playing the games I use to, even with using the crappy red & blue glasses (until I get the proper kit to do it right)
even now, I'd rather play the game in 3D with crappy color.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
that's how good it is, that I would deal with having shitty color to have 3D, and then when I get the kit, it will be perfect color in 3D.
it's really one of those things that most people (even I) have thought before trying it that it's probably not that great, and that it would be a half ass effect, but really it's not.
ther'es nothing wrong with liking Nvidia, and there's nothing wrong with liking ATI, sometimes ATI is better, they are for performance right now, but it's different for me.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
Stop smoking pot. How does this 3D crap perform better in displaying colors?
How is it different for you with the acceptance of liking one brand over another? You're just another 12-year old fanboy. You don't bring any arguments, you don't have the least of research and you simply have lots of emotion over a brand, which makes your ideas of the brand turn out to be of a religion than a materialistic matter. Which is simply sickening.
BorkaBonum 2 years ago
your a fucktard, I was saying that when you view the 3D with red & blue glasses the color isn't very good, and when your using the proper kit, you get 3D, and perfect color (as appose to having shitty color with the red & blue glasses)
ATI is just fine, I'm not a fanboy, if ATI offered a proper 3D enabled video card, I would probably get an ATI card, but they don't, and being 3D creates a HUGE dif. in immersion, it's worth it to me, to go with Nvidia, because they offer it, it's that simple.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
please don't be like everyone I have fucking talked to that says 3D gaming is shit, and just a bunch of hype, everyone I have talked to has said that, and then surprise surprise they haven't even fucking tried it!
how can they form an opinion on something they haven't even tried?
seriously, youtube is fucking full of people that have an opinion about something they know FUCK ALL about.
ignorant dickheads if you ask me.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
and wtf are you talking about, me treating it like a religion?
augh, I can't believe I'm fucking arguing this shit, you fucking expect me to buy ATI when they don't offer something as immersive as 3D Gaming?
your the fucking retard here, you'd choose ATI over Nvidia if your games ran at 1000 fps, even tho Nvidia offers more immersion.
I guess I'll be like everyone else, just buy a video card because it offers 60 fps more than ur eye can even detect, and say fuck the immersion.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
it's so fucking stupid too, EVERYONE that argues with me about 3D Gaming, has NOT even fucking tried 3D gaming, notice how NO ONE that has ACTUALLY tried 3D Gaming argues with me? because they agree with me that it's amazing.
its always stupid 15 year olds that think they are geniuses that havent even tried it, have an opinion, its like forming an opinion on a movie, you haven't even fucken seen.
"Yes this movie sucked, even tho I didn't even see it, I'm a genius, I know the meaning of life"
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
Why the fuck do you waste your time here, 1981? Nobody gives a fuck about the 3D Vision as it's an boring GIMMICK until it develops to a technology that makes sense without having to buy surprisingly expensive, crappy monitors and and run Nvidias laughable videocard adapters.
Seeing how the 3D Vision isn't really any sort of hot item on Nvidias selling records sort of speaks for the industry not giving more of a shit for boring gimmicks than anyone else around here.
BorkaBonum 2 years ago
lol, anyways, your STILL speaking from no experience, how can you say it's a gimmick, you haven't even tried it. WHAT A JOKE.
and also the monitor is not a crappy monitor. if not used for 3D, it at least makes for a very good gaming monitor.
anyways, I'm done arguing with fucking idiots like yourself, your the fucking fan boy here. while I have no problem buying ATI cards, I will even admit their 5870 is very fast and worth the money, IF you don't want 3D gaming.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
You're coming here on AMDs official YouTube channel and jerk off with the 3d Vision crap nobody could care less about. You're basicly the one starting all this.
Take your shit somewhere else. Nobody cares about 3D Vision, period.
BorkaBonum 2 years ago
haha this actually makes me laugh, because your the one that's missing out on a whole new level of gameplay, omg, I wish I could see your face when you find out what you have been missing, hahahahahahahaha fucking hilarious!
later man, haha
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
"a whole new level of gameplay"
Fail. The game still plays the same, the visual representation is what differs. Nobody cares about 3D Vision as it doesn't justify a $400-500 pricetag for a crappy monitor and some labeled Nvidia crap. And looking how the 3D Vision isn't selling or even making the least of fuzz, maybe it's just You who portrait it to be more of a deal than the rest of the industry thinks it is.
BorkaBonum 2 years ago 2
yeah well, if you were to take a look at some ppls vids about 3D Vision, & read some FUCKING comments from people, you would know how good it is.
do you understand what a review it? Do you understand people form opinions upon the integration of new information and their brain, not bullshit "beliefs" of what they "Think" it is like, based on nothing. otherwise I could just sit here and be like
"Duck tastes like shit, I've never tried it but it tastes like shit, I should know, I never tried it"
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
With every comment you touch another level of absolute stupidity. Get out of here.
BorkaBonum 2 years ago
lol, yeah I'm the stupid one because I actually try things before talking negative about it, or at least investigate it to find out what people think about. Right.....
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
Efco88 has a Crysis-5870 gameplay on max settings with 8x aa. He averages around 40 fps, the card is a beast....And Nvidia fanboiz are loosing their minds.
helldrell666 2 years ago
and what the fuck is wrong with you? I believe I started talking about this, by making a simple comment about how Nvidia has 3D Vision, and you take it as some personal attack on you...
so what, what's wrong with admitting Nvidia has a good feature, just because YOU personally don't like it, doesn't mean it's junk,and that Nvidia sucks.
Nvidia makes amazing cards, and so does ATI, Nvidia offers something ATI doesn't, and ATI offers something Nvidia doesn't at the present time, DX11.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
fuck off nvidia fanboy over defensives spamming freak
sgtheadhole 2 years ago
lol, I give GOOD reasons to get an Nvidia card, WITHOUT saying ATI is shit, and that both are good companies, and I tell people that if they want 3D get Nvidia, if they want Performance get the 5870, now what's wrong with that? I'm not being a retard, and just saying "ATI sucks!!!"
so why the hostility? I will recommend ATI to one person, and Nvidia to another, not like I'm hardcore ONLY NVIDIA.
Who knows, my next purchase may be ATI, but that depends, as I can't see into the future.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
If you think 3D design think quadro, Im an ATI/ AMD fan, but i have to give to NVIDIA, the Quadro cards are insane, Fire Gls are also good, but not that good, now for gaming, ATI rocks, its cheap, really good quality, FAST, comparing that to NVIDIA; well its fast, but freaking expensive, so they are really compared
PanZerjer 2 years ago
well, there are reasons for Nvidia's cards being more expensive, I'd go into it, but nobody considers it important enough for some reason.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
what do you mean ?
Usually ATI cards have better effects ( due to the driver options ) while NVIDIA cards priorizes performance, or at least thats what i heard lol.
The only advantage of nvidia by now seems to be the PhysX, but still ATI cards are cheaper so they make for it. The problem of NVIDIA to me is that its too much advertising...
But well, about buying a NVIDIA/ATI card it depends on the price range you wanna expend and how much is it in where you can get, but both will satisfy n1
XBlackFuryX 2 years ago
the advantages of the Nvidia cards would be Physx, and 3D Vision, with great performance. ATI right now offers DX11 of course, but really to me 3D gaming is more important, and I'm not talking about 3D how most people see 3D, most people when I say 3D they say...
"Dude, every game has been 3D since like Doom 1"
but they don't understand what REAL 3D is like.
most people know fuck all about it, and think they know everything about it.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
at least I will say ATI is good, your just like "Egh egh egh, fucking Nvidia sucks, Nvidia blows, if someone gave me an Nvidia card, I'd piss on it, egh egh egh"
egh = the sound retards and ignorant fucks make.
am I the only person that thinks it's stupid for someone to have a negative opinion on something they haven't even tried?
go fucking try it, THEN come back and comment, until then shut the fuck up.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
Why don't you watch a couple reviews of it, like fucking everyone else does.
watch?v=tLImrYqLsIA
watch?v=37hWzy5SGw0
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
I know I'm not going to go around saying
"Fuck being immersed in games, I want to play games at 120 fps!!"
a rate TWICE as high, the eye can't even detect.
I agree you need performance, like I don't expect ANYONE to play a game at 20 fps in 3D, lol
but at the same time, you wanna be immersed in your game and have performance, if it means playing a game at 80 fps and be thoroughly immersed, it's worth it, and HIGHLY playable at 80 fps, and then when you don't want 3D on, the FPS goes up.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
it's really one of those things that in theory sounds "Iffy" and cheesy at best, but then in practice it's a whole other story.
I was the same way, I thought it would be stupid too..
I say you at least owe it to yourself to read reviews on it.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
From what I have read it is nothing much than another 3D solution. It's well put together so it is easier for beginners to function but if I wanted 3D I could go for the Zalman solution and still keep my ATI Radeon 4870. But I still have no interests in 3D.
mmstick 2 years ago
Zalman solution?
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
lol, yeah you would still need an Nvidia card, sorry, just researched it.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
It works with ATI as well.
mmstick 2 years ago
wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooot
GamingDude12 2 years ago
The only thing I dislike about the eyefinity is the monitors. If there was ever a removable frames for monitors, the eyefinity would look simply amazing without having the monitor frames in your way, other then that, it's pretty cool.
TenzionX 2 years ago
i want to buy a 5870 but they to high for right know
67CopperHead 2 years ago
And I was all set to buy a 4890 Graphics card. *sigh* Now i gotta save some more. LOL
kif868 2 years ago
Great peice of hardware though i am going to get myself the 5850 the 5870 is a bit out of my price range :( but its only a difference of a few frames and when newer drivers come out we will see more performance out of these :D
fossilfern 2 years ago
Comment removed
someoneAPB 2 years ago
it's competing with gtx 295 and 4870 x2 even AMD will stop producing X2 cause this one 5870 has the same performance but with a single GPU with addition the support of DX 11 .. it' incredible really
microvision9 2 years ago
AWESOMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Zi0in0 2 years ago
WOahh that looks like a Computer Exaust !
thenameless191993 2 years ago
this mean it is more powerfull than 4890????????
m2uk550 2 years ago
look it up on Tom's Hardware site
"ATI Radeon HD 5870: DirectX 11, Eyefinity, And Serious Speed"
not just speed but great things like power management. you should see the power usage on idle ...oh my ... i want it now
ZankDigiTrash 2 years ago
is faster tht a 4870x2 and even the 295gtx is some cases
agearmaster1 2 years ago
Yea lol strange question :D :D :D :D :D
edgars911 2 years ago
by far.
NSFThunderbird 2 years ago
yes 5870 more powerfull it can beat a GTX 295
67CopperHead 2 years ago
no it can't, but it gets really close on ATI tuned games
Mr937595 2 years ago
COOL!GOOD CARD!
JIEHUH1990 2 years ago
i got 4870 1gig edition. i will wait for non reference coolers and price drops...$300 would be comfortable
Vagmonster666 2 years ago
theres also the hd 5850, which still beats the gtx 285.
RobsRigg 2 years ago
I have two 4870's in crossfire mode, AWESOME
Poco1997 2 years ago
I will wait another generetions maybe 2 cause i got the 4870X2
1bchrisd1 2 years ago
i got 4850 (H) :P
MegaG15 2 years ago
we are at the same situation budd ;p what do u mean 2? 5870x2 or? or 68xx series?
asslister 2 years ago
sorry
i wanted to say i will wait 1 or 2 generations because ive got the 4870X2 card
1bchrisd1 2 years ago
yeag mang, im thinking the same way, own 4870x2 my self ;3
asslister 2 years ago
design of the graphics card was awesume :P
Nobzu 2 years ago
That cooler is so sick :P .
veljkocar 2 years ago
It looks kind of like a car. I hope its not like previous ati coolers (the 4870) where its loud, yet idles at some bullshit temperature like 70.
Luky1Jay 2 years ago
Your case airflow must suck pretty hard for the 4870 to idle at 70C... even with the reference cooler.
Anyway, according to reviews, the 5800-series cooler is supposed to be very good.
Gw2Archon 2 years ago
Nah ive used 3 cases with this card, and all my friends and ive read quite a bit on the forums. Its only the original ATi and older sapphire coolers that do it. I have a 2nd one in crossfire and it uses the new sapphire coolers, which idle at 50~ :)
Luky1Jay 2 years ago
did u even get a 4870?
sgtheadhole 2 years ago
It only uses 27 Watts in Idle mode, look up the facts.
iD0NUTZ 2 years ago
I hope the price will be sweet as with HD4800 series
func0il 2 years ago
Yes, for 270€ buy me a x2 version
Dragst3er 2 years ago
yeah amd / ati rocks fukk!
icguilty 2 years ago 2
Sweet, amd is back in town!
teckim 2 years ago 2
w00t!
ikcti 2 years ago
With DirectX 11 games .. nothing can stand against this guy .. waiting some benchmarks of DX 11 games.
legendray2008 2 years ago 3
I want. And I suppose this mean bye Nividia.
oskarsoftw 2 years ago 6
ATi FTW !
gigabit942007 2 years ago 5
my 4870x2 is old now lol
german199denuevo 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nvidia FTW!
NZXTblueline 2 years ago
ATI/AMD FTW NUBLET
GameHax555 2 years ago 4
ati owns nvidia ;)
the longer, the more
Willyfisch 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
we will see :D
nvidia owns ati!
NZXTblueline 2 years ago
then why r u watching ATi vids
CFOShock 2 years ago