NASA video Apollo Landing Sites from satellite

[Lachausis]

I'm not an anti- or pro-, but these pictures aren't convincing. Looks too much CGI.

[MTMind2]

@Lachausis - To be honest, EVERYTHING looks CGI or 'photoshopped' to somebody these days :), hence you have to look beyond that. Why would NASA fake photos that will EASILY to shown to be fake by probes from other countries/nations (Japan, China, Europe, private companies etc) in the near future. That doesn't make sense. Hence they are real.

Every new piece of evidence supports the moon landings, such as Japan's Kaguya (Serene) probe a few years ago;

/watch?v=bpveN21EM9Q

/watch?v=6r80qhoPB0g

[Lachausis]

@MTMind2 I know it is expensive and pointless, but they should send a robotic ranger to one of the landing sites and finally film it in HD.

[MTMind2]

@Lachausis - But that still wouldn't convince the hoax believers, they'll just say any new footage is fake too, only this time new techniques will be added to the claims, such as CGI ("It may look real, but it's not" they'll say).

Also, the landing sites are historical, therefore NASA will not want rovers travelling all over them and hence destroying the first footprints left by man on the moon, and so everything would be filmed from a distance, leading to even more claims of it being fake :)

[Lachausis]

@MTMind2 So what about Van Allen belt?

[MTMind2]

@Lachausis - X-ray radiation can kill us, but every day millions of X-rays are carried out on patients. Hence it's about the intensity of radiation and length of exposure.

Here's what Dr James Van Allen said about the hoax claims and the belts named after him; "The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense". :-)

[Lachausis]

@MTMind2 Well he did work for NASA after all. I'm not implying that he lied, but nobody really knows how's it out there, unless they've been there. What important is - did astronauts mention it?

[MTMind2]

@Lachausis - Around the world over the years, there were/are thousands of scientists in his field who don't work for NASA and yet none of them disagree and claim the reverse (including USA's enemies). 'We' do know what's out there in terms of the moon landings, we also know that the Apollo craft's trajectory took them through the thin edges of the belts in about 1 hour. VA estimated they could spend a month in the belts without ill effects. Most Apollo astronauts were test pilots not scientists.

[MTMind2]

@Lachausis - I'm not playing down the dangers of radiation, but it's a word that seems to conjure up images of nuclear explosions and people being disintergrated, but the VA belts are not like that, neither are they like the pulsating space energy fields we used to see in Star Trek, where astronauts are zapped the moment they enter the belts (and their Apollo craft rocks from side to side :)). The biggest radiation danger to the astronauts would have been a large solar flare aimed at earth.

[TheDrac3000]

@MTMind2 These Countries you mentioned,are ALL getting a Great deal of money from the U.S,every year...Now China is getting our Gasoline...our Gov. says,they are getting better prices from China,so Now we suffer Gas shortage,and almost $5.00 per Gal...so every Piece of NEW Evidence Shows....BLACKMAIL!!!!!!

''Why would Nasa Fake Photos...how about Billions of Tax-payer money per year,since before the Apollo missions began..what do you think every U.S citiz. would do..finding out lie.

[MTMind2]

@TheDrac3000 - With all due respect, your reply is nonsense :) We live in a global economy, where everyone trades with everyone else, so to claim that China and Japan are somehow beholding to the USA and therefore part of the conspiracy is ridiculous. After the economic crisis of 2007/2008, for which we're still suffering the effects today, China are now in a far stronger position than ever before, and have their own plans to send men to the moon. The moon landings were real, get over it :-)

[TheDrac3000]

@MTMind2 With all due respect..back"! I hope you read this comment a tad' more carefully,as I never stated.."They didn't go to Moon"..I stated,that the "Film Footage" they show us' walking on Moon,is Faked'.If you knew,10% of what I know'...you would realize,that you're beginning statements actually confirm 'Everything',that I had stated...you should do research on the Past, to present on these subjects...Saul Alinsky./The illuminati./Apollo missions,Dates/ETA...you will know..con't 2

[MTMind2]

@TheDrac3000 - Good, so you agree they landed on the moon (6 times btw, although you may disagree), so let's take your claim that the footage is faked. How? Moon hoax believers say NASA used the tech of the time, which is wires and slow motion, and yet no sci-fi movie ever made nor any moon hoax film has ever recreated 1/6th gravity to the perfection seen in Apollo footage using such tech. So how did NASA achieve in 1969 what the world's best special effects experts can't do today?

[TheDrac3000]

@MTMind2and realize the True meaning of these Dates and exact ETA's, of Apollo missions,after you research ''illuminati'' and their 'Sacred numbers,The numbers 3, 7, 9,11,13, 33, 39. Any multiple of these numbers have special meaning to the Illuminati.the Bilderberg Group has core of 39 members who are broken into 3 groups of 13 members in each group.the core of 39 answers to the 13 who make up the Policy Committee.the 13 members of the Policy Committee answer to the Round Table of Nine

[MTMind2]

@TheDrac3000 - Sorry, but I'm not interested in such claims, all I'm seeing is the same kind of pattern fitting logic that makes some believe Nostradamus predicted many events in history, that the Qur'an states many discoveries found in modern science, and to claims found in the book "The Bible Code" and much more.

Like other moon landing conspiracies, your argument depends on the footage being faked, therefore it means nothing until you can prove 100% that it's possible to fake.

[TheDrac3000]

@MTMind2 very well said,I am working on this 'very thing' as we speak.I spent hours,days figuring out the different ways Nasa has tampered with the photos of the MoonI found them.they use 6 different techniques,hiding the real surface of the moon,I can change 5 of these tech. back to original pic.but the 6th..I call Blacknas'A.,as they 'Erased the images inside of photo..but the photos i have now,you will know why,they could not film live' on moon,Hieroglyphs,machines etc.everywhere

[MTMind2]

@TheDrac3000 - Firstly, thanks :) Secondly, that wasn't quite what I was asking for, since that's what moon hoax believers have already been doing for a few decades (hence their claims on YT). My point is about actual proof of concept. Eg, if some claim Usain Bolt uses secret jets in his shoes, then magnified photos of what they claim are signs of an exhaust from his shoes is not proof, I first want someone to build jet enhanced shoes to prove it's possible to cheat that way! :)

[MTMind2]

@TheDrac3000 - Hence my problem with the faked video claims. Apollo's 1/6th gravity is perfect, even kicked up dust falls back down at 1/6th G, so why haven't sci-fi movies come close to matching it? Even in the highest budget sci-fi series and films, no matter how many alien worlds and spaceships they visit, gravity exists mostly in 2 states, earth gravity or zero gravity, never 1/6th G, or 1/3rd G, or half G etc. Why can't they do was NASA is said to have easily done 42 years ago?

[MTMind2]

@TheDrac3000 - (Excuse the typos)

To add to my last post, why haven't any moon hoax films attempted to do that? If I believed the footage was faked and I was a film maker, my documentary would open with an apparent Apollo scene, with astronauts bouncing around in 1/6th G. THEN, 30 secs later, they would be joined by a guy in casual clothes who also bounces around in 1/6th G. What an opening! I'll reveal how it was done (i.e. how NASA did it) at the end of my film, proving it's possible.

[akirafactor]

So fake, just overhead pictures of the simulation models.

[alpine1600s]

They look pretty blurry to me. One factor that is a problem is the radiation outside of LEO. the ISS is the most radiation resistant spacecraft to date. The Apollo crews were some really lucky guys not to get radiation sickness. Over 80% lucky! The mars missions barely break 20% in success rate!

[towmandave00]

its nice to see NASA can finally afford photoshop

[dmoneytuttle]

What a joke! These picture's prove nothing. FAKE.

[nakazatoGTR]

@dmoneytuttle yeah whatever the proof, always a fake but you theorists bake your "PROOFS" and are too complicated that it collapses on its own.

[mrmoostashy]

Those pictures in the video of the 'supposed' Apollo landing sites are terrible quality, are they supposed to quell the naysayers?

[midx13]

I'm still undecided weather the landing on the moon did happen. But this video is fake I have seen better graphics in video games

[minieggg1]

@midx13 the satellite was 25km from the surface and that camera has a resolution of about 200mm per pixel! That quality is amazing.

[therealnightwriter]

lol, every single picture taken by Apollo fake, there is a film reel accidentally released by NASA that shows them in orbit faking shots out of the window (Apollo 12, I think) I just tried to look it up to provide a link, but not re-found yet.

[juanbbien]

I am maybe leaning to the fact they did land on the moon,but that a lot of the so called film footage was made here on earth to bolster up the American image of it all,like they have to do with everything.We are the best attitude,what do think my friends,I would be interested to know

[arobekie]

@juanbbien I do believe man did go to the moon,but i also believe that some of the photos were faked,after all the astronauts were test pilots not photographers,they are just so perfect,considering they had no viewfinders,i dont think NASA would spend billions of dollars and use precious time and limited life support to take photos of posing astronauts,these are what you might call "glamour" shots,soley for marketing purposes,they are of no use to the scientific community.

[haddukken]

@arobekie "Marketing" as you call it ensures they have a budget to continue space exploration.. we are talking about billions of dollars... so i would have to disagree with you, they would have definitely factored photo opps into their plan.

[arobekie]

@haddukken Disagree all you want,i know NASA spends billions on its space programme,how many of those classic photos do you think they have sold in the last forty years,each framed photo must cost a few dollars,as a child my bedroom walls were adorned with them,they were sold worldwide,and as you know,every penny counts.As for the photos,yes they were factored in their EVAs,we have all seen them,pictures of rocks and soil,loved by scientists,but dont hit the spot when haging on the wall.

[arobekie]

@juanbbien I do believe man did go to the moon,but i also believe that some of the photos were faked,after all the astronauts were test pilots not photographers,they are just so perfect,considering they had no viewfinders,i dont think NASA would spend billions of dollars and use precious time and limited life support to take photos of posing astronauts,these are what you might call "glamour" shots,soley for marketing purposes,they are of no use to the scientific community.

[juanbbien]

Junglecat 1176,there is quite a lot of information on the Van - Allen belts,i like you wondered about them, but it's said that the rockets went through the thinest part of them and they were going at a speed of 25,000 m.p.h. The astronauts could have made it through the radiation in one hour therefor receiving 1/25 of the radiation, which is not considered dangerous.It's just something to consider again.

[LWJCarroll]

Great to see...its a pity the experiments arent still in contact with NASA...I assume they could have sent a long term stream of local data....Thanks...Laurie Carroll AKL NZ

[RussellTuan]

lowered its orbit from 50km above the Moon's surface to just 25km.this means more speed is needed,picture will have motion-bur I am afraid of. 

[Fr0sht3d]

FAKE THE MOON IS MADE OF CHEESE WELL ALL KNOW IT

[monitoryou]

"Okay folks, we can't find out the real pictures of these missions anymore. So we are offering some nice new made pictures and animations just for you to know we were there." LOL

[Junglecat1776]

Nobody has ever landed on the moon. The van Allen belts. It's a hoax.

[JimmyRockDeutschland]

Hahaha! No true pictures. Only computer animations!

[thoraxe423]

Why don't they show pics of Apollo 18,19,and 20 now that would impress me!

[Skydivingkittens]

@thoraxe423 Because those missions never happened.

[arobekie]

@thoraxe423 Because its orbiting the moon,not the earth.

[encrypt777]

All in all still a cool video

[andrewquigley18]

fake

[kiararei]

typical humans, left behind their rubbish even when visiting another planet

[encrypt777]

@kiararei Im sorry I had to laugh but that was the first thing I noticed also :-D and they talk about us lol