you are exactly right. Our country barely even resembles a democracy. Our government thinks on a partisan standpoint, rather than a moral standpoint. We have no voice to change the world, and those who do think about their personal gain.
Great video! I especially like your support of the troops, no matter what goes on at the political level!
I agree with you that when people get vulgar, become disrespectful, they are just shutting down dialog. That doesn't mean we can't voice our views, disappointments and concerns, but people really need to work on being civil and try to connect with the other side and be constructive. Each side beleives they're right, but that doesn't mean they are on everything!
Thanks Rog. Like we were saying in your video post to Duncan Hunter - We can all disagree but it doesn't mean we have to throw respect out of the conversation.
You know McCain doesn't like the whole internet thing as it is, and I'm hoping he isn't further discouraged by his "ratings" or people verbally bashing him. We need all of these candidates to listen to us. So YES I hope he responds ... I hope he takes the time and responds to all of our videos.
I agree with you bud. But I dissagree with your asseccment of bush. We hired a cowboy and got a pc puss. However, the frontline in our war on terror must stand. Reguardless of how badly the opposition picks apart the pc cover story. Or misrepresents the reasons we are there. You sound like a reasonable guy. So far, I think you would agree with me when I say we don't need another silver tongue. We need John Wayne in the oval office.
I can't remember saying anything about Bush. The US should fight against World Terrorism, the problem is we're not. 9/11 happened and we went after Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan. Then we went to Iraq because of WMDs. Now we're there because of Operation Iraqi Freedom. All along the way worldwide terrorism was as rampant as it's been for the past 40 years.
I'll spell it out. They are bait, voluntarily. And you are right. Things aren't going to get better until they drop the PC pretence. Let's face it; a Christian isn't going to harbor a Klan member that just blew up a church, or even associate with one. But a Muslim has to shelter a ghihadist as a matter of faith, even if he just blew up a mosque.
I've learned the differences of faith & religion are lie a broad spectrum for everyone in the world. We can all look at the "Westboro Baptist Church" for what Christianity really is or we can focus on the positivity of a Christian Church. The very same goes for Muslims. Classifying an entire group based on the actions of the few is bigotry - I'll have no part in it.
I don't agree with everything you've said, but I applaud your voice, man. You're reasonable, honest, and direct. This video is a great addition to the conversation. Thanks.
No, I've got no dispute with that. I'm just not as gung-ho about decentralization for all powers. I think there are many things individuals and states can do much better than the federal government, but that the combined power of the national body is more effective on other fronts. Or even, for something like education, where each can make improvements and work together. No, I was in full agreement with the spirit of your vid and the manner of presentation. Class act.
I see. Let's look at some key issues from the 2004 debates - same sex marriage and abortion were topics demanding Federal Laws. When you consider that's laws on marriage & pregnancies, the Federal Government should never mandate that responsibility.
Let's look in the face of catastrophies such as Hurricane Katrina; the majority of real support came from the combined States and not the Federal Government. It's just something to think about. Thanks.
You're right about Katrina, but only because the federal gov' dropped the ball. Plus, if we had the Nat'l Guard here, they could have helped too. I'm split on marriage and abortion, but I do think that there should be a national consensus.
There's alot of debating that we won't need to go into on that, but I would hope to make you understand the need for us to govern ourselves without Federal Laws.
We must remove as much authority from the Federal Government as possible. If each State loses the authority of personal government, then America will become a full Oligarchy.
What's to stop each state from becoming an oligarchy? What's needed is term limits, limits on how much can be spent on campaigns, and shorter campaign periods. I'm all for taking power from the wealthy few and electing more people interested in service. But I do think a united national power can be more expedient in filling certain civil needs.
That would mean secession from the Union and the creation of new countries & governments - which a few States have considered. Texas & California among them.
You can see what happens with United National Power when it comes from our Federal Government (Hurricane Katrina). That unity worked best when each State came together, not as we relied on the central government.
The Federal Government should in turn be apart of the World politics and follow international laws, which America helped create through the United Nations. Currently the US and other powerful nations ignore such laws and the UN no longer has any real authority.
We should absolutely be more concerned with foreign affairs on the national level, but even more importantly, the American citizens should be more concerned with what's going outside our borders- check out my response to McCain.
I still think that's because the national gov was dysfunctional. If it was ready, it could have been a strong hub for the combined powers of the states. They weren't flawless in their response, they couldn't be, because they were working independently. And as for the oligarchy on the state level, I was speaking figuratively- rule of the wealthy privileged few.
It's the point of a republic to break down power to it's lowest levels. You'ved stopped on the question of State corruption, but the idea of decentralizing authority goes down to County City & Townships. The point of the segregation of power to keep one another in check, so one town won't use corruption to gain power over the other towns. One city won't gain power over the other cities. One State won't gain power over the other States. The Federal Government won't gain absolute authority.
Look at where we are right now especially in the area of voting power. We have seven/eight States with more voting power than the others. Americans are accepting the path of majority decisions and Federal Laws superseding Local Laws.
I understand that, but that's where we disagree. I don't think that's a bad thing on some issues. There are some areas of policy that should be uniform across the country, while others should be up to localities. The most important strength in the segregation and redundancy of of powers is in keeping the other levels honest and transparent.
wow that video was amazing...honest and very true...I couldnt agree with you more, I'm sick of our corrupt government, and unforunitly I think the only way is to get the career politicians out of Washington D.C. from both parties.
I definitely have opinions about career Senators and the necessity of setting Terms Limits for them ... We've had Senators in power for over 40-50 years; That's too much influence for one person to have.
I'd enjoy running for office locally, but I just don't come across as the smiling baby-kissing politician. I know how politics work the media and how a large majority of people vote based on superficial things. Me being a regular guy is a benefit for the commonman, but we no longer vote that way. We vote in wealth, we vote in lawyers and we vote in people with connections & so-called experience. I could prove that by starting a Presidential Campaign here on YouTube.
ya start locally...it is sad how only people who have millions to burn win office...how are they supposed to represent the majority working population that make America worth living in.
It's a common argument I have in my own family. I tell my older brother that he isn't one of the common people because of his wealth. I say the commonman is like me & my father, those guys working in the warehouse - not people like my brother up in the offices with a group of engineers. He looks down on warehouse workers and I try to remind him that he's talking about his own father too.
joe, you start saying we need a leader that will unite us and lead us with a strong person at the top, but at the same time, shift a lot of power to the more local branches of government. that will be a hard thing to do, and i don't know if our government is willing to make that kind of change.
It's certainly not a difficult task, because it's something we used to have. We've lost it over time because Americans are embrassing COMPLETE democracy, without remembering the dangers of a full democracies.
I'll see real change when a President declares NO NEW LAWS on Taxes, Gay Marriages, Abortions or Minimum Wages - but instead to allow each State to mandate their own authority.
Leadership isn't about taking charge and giving orders, it's about being that person we are willing to follow.
You sound like a Ron Paul supporter!!
Freedom2Learn 4 years ago
You are the bomb! Keep setting the issues straight. Also, let me know what I can do to help!
mellybegood 4 years ago
you are exactly right. Our country barely even resembles a democracy. Our government thinks on a partisan standpoint, rather than a moral standpoint. We have no voice to change the world, and those who do think about their personal gain.
Drofwarcrelyt 4 years ago
Great video! I especially like your support of the troops, no matter what goes on at the political level!
I agree with you that when people get vulgar, become disrespectful, they are just shutting down dialog. That doesn't mean we can't voice our views, disappointments and concerns, but people really need to work on being civil and try to connect with the other side and be constructive. Each side beleives they're right, but that doesn't mean they are on everything!
RogCBrand 4 years ago
Thanks Rog. Like we were saying in your video post to Duncan Hunter - We can all disagree but it doesn't mean we have to throw respect out of the conversation.
j0eg0d 4 years ago
I hope he takes the time to watch and respond to your video.
Aedak33 4 years ago
You know McCain doesn't like the whole internet thing as it is, and I'm hoping he isn't further discouraged by his "ratings" or people verbally bashing him. We need all of these candidates to listen to us. So YES I hope he responds ... I hope he takes the time and responds to all of our videos.
j0eg0d 4 years ago
I agree with you bud. But I dissagree with your asseccment of bush. We hired a cowboy and got a pc puss. However, the frontline in our war on terror must stand. Reguardless of how badly the opposition picks apart the pc cover story. Or misrepresents the reasons we are there. You sound like a reasonable guy. So far, I think you would agree with me when I say we don't need another silver tongue. We need John Wayne in the oval office.
Kilkman 4 years ago
I can't remember saying anything about Bush. The US should fight against World Terrorism, the problem is we're not. 9/11 happened and we went after Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan. Then we went to Iraq because of WMDs. Now we're there because of Operation Iraqi Freedom. All along the way worldwide terrorism was as rampant as it's been for the past 40 years.
j0eg0d 4 years ago
I'll spell it out. They are bait, voluntarily. And you are right. Things aren't going to get better until they drop the PC pretence. Let's face it; a Christian isn't going to harbor a Klan member that just blew up a church, or even associate with one. But a Muslim has to shelter a ghihadist as a matter of faith, even if he just blew up a mosque.
Kilkman 4 years ago
I've learned the differences of faith & religion are lie a broad spectrum for everyone in the world. We can all look at the "Westboro Baptist Church" for what Christianity really is or we can focus on the positivity of a Christian Church. The very same goes for Muslims. Classifying an entire group based on the actions of the few is bigotry - I'll have no part in it.
j0eg0d 4 years ago
I don't agree with everything you've said, but I applaud your voice, man. You're reasonable, honest, and direct. This video is a great addition to the conversation. Thanks.
scamon01 4 years ago
That's cool. What didn't you agree with though ? Maybe that John McCain was once an American Patriot ?
j0eg0d 4 years ago
No, I've got no dispute with that. I'm just not as gung-ho about decentralization for all powers. I think there are many things individuals and states can do much better than the federal government, but that the combined power of the national body is more effective on other fronts. Or even, for something like education, where each can make improvements and work together. No, I was in full agreement with the spirit of your vid and the manner of presentation. Class act.
scamon01 4 years ago
I see. Let's look at some key issues from the 2004 debates - same sex marriage and abortion were topics demanding Federal Laws. When you consider that's laws on marriage & pregnancies, the Federal Government should never mandate that responsibility.
Let's look in the face of catastrophies such as Hurricane Katrina; the majority of real support came from the combined States and not the Federal Government. It's just something to think about. Thanks.
j0eg0d 4 years ago
You're right about Katrina, but only because the federal gov' dropped the ball. Plus, if we had the Nat'l Guard here, they could have helped too. I'm split on marriage and abortion, but I do think that there should be a national consensus.
scamon01 4 years ago
There's alot of debating that we won't need to go into on that, but I would hope to make you understand the need for us to govern ourselves without Federal Laws.
We must remove as much authority from the Federal Government as possible. If each State loses the authority of personal government, then America will become a full Oligarchy.
j0eg0d 4 years ago
What's to stop each state from becoming an oligarchy? What's needed is term limits, limits on how much can be spent on campaigns, and shorter campaign periods. I'm all for taking power from the wealthy few and electing more people interested in service. But I do think a united national power can be more expedient in filling certain civil needs.
scamon01 4 years ago
That would mean secession from the Union and the creation of new countries & governments - which a few States have considered. Texas & California among them.
You can see what happens with United National Power when it comes from our Federal Government (Hurricane Katrina). That unity worked best when each State came together, not as we relied on the central government.
j0eg0d 4 years ago
The Federal Government should in turn be apart of the World politics and follow international laws, which America helped create through the United Nations. Currently the US and other powerful nations ignore such laws and the UN no longer has any real authority.
j0eg0d 4 years ago
We should absolutely be more concerned with foreign affairs on the national level, but even more importantly, the American citizens should be more concerned with what's going outside our borders- check out my response to McCain.
scamon01 4 years ago
I still think that's because the national gov was dysfunctional. If it was ready, it could have been a strong hub for the combined powers of the states. They weren't flawless in their response, they couldn't be, because they were working independently. And as for the oligarchy on the state level, I was speaking figuratively- rule of the wealthy privileged few.
scamon01 4 years ago
It's the point of a republic to break down power to it's lowest levels. You'ved stopped on the question of State corruption, but the idea of decentralizing authority goes down to County City & Townships. The point of the segregation of power to keep one another in check, so one town won't use corruption to gain power over the other towns. One city won't gain power over the other cities. One State won't gain power over the other States. The Federal Government won't gain absolute authority.
j0eg0d 4 years ago
Look at where we are right now especially in the area of voting power. We have seven/eight States with more voting power than the others. Americans are accepting the path of majority decisions and Federal Laws superseding Local Laws.
j0eg0d 4 years ago
I understand that, but that's where we disagree. I don't think that's a bad thing on some issues. There are some areas of policy that should be uniform across the country, while others should be up to localities. The most important strength in the segregation and redundancy of of powers is in keeping the other levels honest and transparent.
scamon01 4 years ago
wow that video was amazing...honest and very true...I couldnt agree with you more, I'm sick of our corrupt government, and unforunitly I think the only way is to get the career politicians out of Washington D.C. from both parties.
AeroJunkie20 4 years ago
I definitely have opinions about career Senators and the necessity of setting Terms Limits for them ... We've had Senators in power for over 40-50 years; That's too much influence for one person to have.
j0eg0d 4 years ago
exactly....if only people like you would run for some office it might restore my faith in government.
AeroJunkie20 4 years ago
I'd enjoy running for office locally, but I just don't come across as the smiling baby-kissing politician. I know how politics work the media and how a large majority of people vote based on superficial things. Me being a regular guy is a benefit for the commonman, but we no longer vote that way. We vote in wealth, we vote in lawyers and we vote in people with connections & so-called experience. I could prove that by starting a Presidential Campaign here on YouTube.
j0eg0d 4 years ago
ya start locally...it is sad how only people who have millions to burn win office...how are they supposed to represent the majority working population that make America worth living in.
AeroJunkie20 4 years ago
It's a common argument I have in my own family. I tell my older brother that he isn't one of the common people because of his wealth. I say the commonman is like me & my father, those guys working in the warehouse - not people like my brother up in the offices with a group of engineers. He looks down on warehouse workers and I try to remind him that he's talking about his own father too.
j0eg0d 4 years ago
Awesome video j0e! Decentralization of power is the way to go.
D4Shawn 4 years ago
Thanks Shawn ^_^
j0eg0d 4 years ago
joe, you start saying we need a leader that will unite us and lead us with a strong person at the top, but at the same time, shift a lot of power to the more local branches of government. that will be a hard thing to do, and i don't know if our government is willing to make that kind of change.
BIndeed 4 years ago
It's certainly not a difficult task, because it's something we used to have. We've lost it over time because Americans are embrassing COMPLETE democracy, without remembering the dangers of a full democracies.
I'll see real change when a President declares NO NEW LAWS on Taxes, Gay Marriages, Abortions or Minimum Wages - but instead to allow each State to mandate their own authority.
Leadership isn't about taking charge and giving orders, it's about being that person we are willing to follow.
j0eg0d 4 years ago
Brilliant, just brilliant. Great video
Fringe111 4 years ago
Thank you, Joy.
j0eg0d 4 years ago