@electrodacus This homebuilt SEM does not have very good resolution -- 5 micrometers perhaps. I am currently working on a slow-scan image buffer which will allow higher quality images, and potentially better resolution.
@Jonasinc1 It's unlikely that this homebuilt scope will ever have the resolution necessary to see a virus, and even bacteria might be a stretch. One problem is that biological samples must be carefully dried and coated with metal to be used in a SEM. I don't have the equipment to do that well, so I would be starting with low-quality samples and trying to image them with a low-resolution SEM. I'll probably eventually try it, though. Stay tuned!
@axel1973w Acceleration voltages below 10KV will produce x-rays of sufficiently long wavelength so that they are stopped by glass and aluminum. They are known as "soft x-rays". The higher the acceleration voltage, the shorter the wavelength, and the more penetrating the x-rays will be. Color TV sets need lead shielding because they operate at higher acceleration voltages than B/W TVs, which do not need shielding.
@rushymoto If you are planning to use the microscope for real analysis, I would recommend finding a used one. eBay always has a bunch in varying states of operability. You can also try contacting local universities or research labs. You may find one collecting dust that no one really wants. There are so few sales, it is difficult to say what a good price is.
Most interesting again. Any idea what the depth of field might be? I guess if you had a gold sprayed bug it could interesting and presume focus scale would enable you to cover full depth. I think you will have to try a fruit fly sometime!!!
i believe that the shakiness of the image can be reduced if the microscope itself is physically separated for the vacuum pumps - vibration of the pumps moves the sample and the image gets shaky
you probably watched it but i found a lot about electron microscopes in this video series
@xXdenhartXx From my understanding, bio-material is difficult to image, at least for back-scatter imaging, because you have to coat the material with a metallic coating.
@AntiProtonBoy Yup, that's definitely the next step of the project. I've always wanted to play with FPGAs, and now is the perfect time to get started. I'll use the FPGA to control the raster generation along with signal capture, and the system should provide lots of flexibility with the best possible image resolution. Let me know if you have any helpful tips on where to get started with FPGAs.
This has been flagged as spam show
'm severely impressed. You have an amazing collection of vids. Thanks for your inspiring work!
deebsboy 1 month ago
Comment removed
deebsboy 1 month ago
Truly impressive work! You seem to know alot about what you are doing;)
xelionizer 3 months ago
pure nerd porn :)
death0intj 4 months ago
Very impressive.
timerider4 5 months ago
I'm extremely impressed great job.
So the wire is about the same diameter as an average human hair.
You can get the same level of magnification with an optical microscope.
What is limiting the resolution?
electrodacus 5 months ago
@electrodacus This homebuilt SEM does not have very good resolution -- 5 micrometers perhaps. I am currently working on a slow-scan image buffer which will allow higher quality images, and potentially better resolution.
bkraz333 5 months ago
This is very neat. What would you have to do to get an image of bacteria or a virus with the microscope?
Jonasinc1 5 months ago
@Jonasinc1 It's unlikely that this homebuilt scope will ever have the resolution necessary to see a virus, and even bacteria might be a stretch. One problem is that biological samples must be carefully dried and coated with metal to be used in a SEM. I don't have the equipment to do that well, so I would be starting with low-quality samples and trying to image them with a low-resolution SEM. I'll probably eventually try it, though. Stay tuned!
bkraz333 5 months ago
Aint u producing a lot of XRAYS too?
axel1973w 6 months ago
@axel1973w Acceleration voltages below 10KV will produce x-rays of sufficiently long wavelength so that they are stopped by glass and aluminum. They are known as "soft x-rays". The higher the acceleration voltage, the shorter the wavelength, and the more penetrating the x-rays will be. Color TV sets need lead shielding because they operate at higher acceleration voltages than B/W TVs, which do not need shielding.
bkraz333 6 months ago
@bkraz333 excellent explanation. thanks
axel1973w 6 months ago
So, In your opinion, How viable is it to find a real microscope on the used market or to build one that can be of good use?
rushymoto 6 months ago
@rushymoto If you are planning to use the microscope for real analysis, I would recommend finding a used one. eBay always has a bunch in varying states of operability. You can also try contacting local universities or research labs. You may find one collecting dust that no one really wants. There are so few sales, it is difficult to say what a good price is.
bkraz333 6 months ago
You are one heck of an engineer! Really love your work on that SEM...!
You actually made this topic quite easy to understand!
Thanks again:D
xelionizer 8 months ago
Wow, I'm impressed. Very cool.
rhuedepo 8 months ago
This machine rocks !!!
BTW: Please help jeriellsworth fix the mass spectrometer.
bejius 9 months ago
The images keep looking better and better. I look forward to seeing more videos and construction details.
googacct 9 months ago
Absolutely amazing!
oisiaa 9 months ago
Most interesting again. Any idea what the depth of field might be? I guess if you had a gold sprayed bug it could interesting and presume focus scale would enable you to cover full depth. I think you will have to try a fruit fly sometime!!!
jpfo1776 9 months ago
Have you considered making a scanning tunneling microscope?
revolutiongames2004 9 months ago
Thats so cool, i need one...
pieznice29 9 months ago
i believe that the shakiness of the image can be reduced if the microscope itself is physically separated for the vacuum pumps - vibration of the pumps moves the sample and the image gets shaky
you probably watched it but i found a lot about electron microscopes in this video series
AgentDexter47 9 months ago
@AgentDexter47 "Scanning Electron Microscope: Pt 1 of 6 "
AgentDexter47 9 months ago
This is the absolute best DIY science on youtube. Keep up the good work. We are rooting for you.
nukwaste 9 months ago
That is very cool. Nice job.
mechadrake 9 months ago
Have you tried your microscope on some bio-material?
xXdenhartXx 9 months ago
@xXdenhartXx From my understanding, bio-material is difficult to image, at least for back-scatter imaging, because you have to coat the material with a metallic coating.
puddingpimp 9 months ago
thorough, entertaining and imformative video. As always :D
Olirap 9 months ago
I wish I had a chance to chat with you a bit more at maker faire.
jeriellsworth 9 months ago 3
@jeriellsworth Yeah, me too. I gather that you are not located in the SF Bay Area? (darn!)
bkraz333 9 months ago
@bkraz333 I get down there often. I'll try giving you a ping next time.
jeriellsworth 9 months ago
This is so neat - is this completely homemade? - It sure looks like it!
DJelectfire 9 months ago
You seriously need to digitise the capture for youtube consumption!
AntiProtonBoy 9 months ago 3
@AntiProtonBoy Yup, that's definitely the next step of the project. I've always wanted to play with FPGAs, and now is the perfect time to get started. I'll use the FPGA to control the raster generation along with signal capture, and the system should provide lots of flexibility with the best possible image resolution. Let me know if you have any helpful tips on where to get started with FPGAs.
bkraz333 9 months ago