Seriously, it's obviously not a helicopter. It's a Reptilian spacecraft with the queen of England on board. Wake up people. The Reptilians are here, only the penguin soldiers from the planet Mongo can save us, but they are being held captive in Area 51!
it was israeli mossud choppers along with our millitary choppers the goal was not to take pics or footage nor save lives it was simple control the area so they may trigger the secret weapons from a remote area to crumble the towers
Oh for god sake, STOP making issues where NONE EXIST.... Whilst there were TV channel Helicopters in the air around the WTC incident, there was POLICE choppers on scene also. So stop getting in a fluster about the "Mysterious" chopper that was quite obviously, far beyond the two towers and due to the reqisite for safe flight would NOT have flown through the smoke.....
Junior YouTube Detectives of various 911 beliefs (and Criminy, there's a lot of variation!) kept telling me to check out "this" vid or "that" because IT was the smoking gun which PROVED that [Jewish Lizardmen used a laser to vaporize the copper plating in the WTC or whatever was the truther's pet theory], so my comment must have been a reaction to the poster's "questions" which, like other conspiranoids' questions, are ever-unanswerable even if answered.
It was NYPD helicopter and there are even few vids filmed from the chopper orbiting around the towers. Conspiracy theorists and other wacky treehuggers have talents to twist and bend even normal things to look like unnatural things.
But the power structure, who has been responsible for educating the masses are well aware that these weak minded drones can be more then counted on to say things like "who cares if it's real or not, big whoop". These 'people' have lost, if they ever had, logical reasoning. They have been brought down to the level of instinctual animals. There 'minds' have been destroyed.
People trust their government and do not know how to apply logic. Yes, Killtown, you are correct, the Fox news helicopter was on the record as the 'first to get their' and that was from quite a distance to get the 9:02 nose out shot, wabc falsely claimed chopper 7 was on the seen at about 8:50 but when the anchor tried to communicate with the pilot no one answered and it was later proven the helicopter had to come from 14 miles away, the beginning of their film is right after the 2nd explosion
someone in this news heli said "it seemed the point on the south tower was getting smaller. I told the pilot to go lower, but suddenly I realised that the WTC was falling to the ground."
@HowToHaloShow Really? Please link me to the news coverage that "news heli" shot while passing the burning WTC, like it had somewhere better to go. I don't believe I ever saw it.
@WelcomeToKilltown it is a news heli and we dont know wich station. u know how many stations probably had helis in the air? either way what asshole fly's though the smoke that coudlve easily takenout his engines
I estimate there was a lack of independent photography, and to me that indicates electromagnetic jamming was utilized. My question is, how is that electromagnetic jamming implemented over such a large area.
It was a police/fire helicopter that was hoping to land on the roof to rescue people that were still inside the buildings but above where the planes impacted. Officials knew those people couldn't get below the impact site using the stairs. It was determined they couldn't land because of the amount of smoke.
@Derekxnl I think, and this is just my guess, you were talking about relativity - things appearing to go faster at person A's perspective than, say for example, person B's position.
@BrickUnit Remember, it took the FAA quite a while to ground all aircraft after the attack. Sure they'd still be flying... also consider the fact that they (rotary wing aircraft) don't have to file a flight plan unless they are above a certain altitude (usually 500 feet- but it varies from location to location).
Well first of all the chopper is flying around the building aka "orbiting," likely assessing damage or getting news footage. Although it looks close, it's likely several hundred or a few thousand feet away from the building being pretty safe. Additionally it would be easy to beat the military there, especially with the tens of helipads scattered throughout New York. It's just another helicopter circling the WTC, this video was also taken from a chopper.
I don't know where the footage is. You need to figure out whose chopper it is and do a little leg work from there. If they have a gyroscopically stabilized camera or FLIR EO Pod then they could assess damage quite easily at speed and distance. If you were a far ways away then it is easy to observe something static while moving fast. Consider how "slow" a jet-liner "appears" to move when at high altitude versus a lower altitude; it's all about relative distance and speed.
@WelcomeToKilltown it wasnt going very fast at all. From a helicopter it's very easy t get a good look at something regardless of speed as long as the pilot is doing it right. And just because it was taking footage doesn't mean it was broadcast or even kept. It also could have simply been an NYPD unit orbiting and waiting for an order.
@WelcomeToKilltown It's actually not flying that fast. From the perspective and angle we see it from it looks like it because we're comparing its size relative to the towers. It's a sort of optical illusion. I don't remember what it's called but I remember learning about it awhile ago in a Psychology class I took.
@WelcomeToKilltown Lets be an asshole and say it was planned by the us government because Aliens and Oil put them up to it. And Maybe hundreds of other assholes would believe it and create more of a problem in society with their skepticisms.
I have taken into consideration actual evidence that is contrary to the published truth. Things like the maximum temperature of jet fuel, thermite burns on the steel columns, WTC 7, etc. But every time I hear about the CGI conspiracy I just shake my head.
That was David Rockefeller in the helicopter. He was to have breakfast with some Cantor Fitzgerald execs that morning at Top of the World Restaurant in WTC1, but was running "a little late."
That was David Rockefeller in that helicopter. He was supposed to have breakfast that morning at the Top of the World restaurant in WTC1 that morning, and was "running a little late."
he wouldn't have been screwed with it being at the top of the tower, he could have just got to the roof and flew away, if anything he could have saved sum ppl
Just face it! You are so desperate you will believe anything! Even lasers, dynamite, C4, Thermite and Missiles, and you are so confused because you smoke pot every day that you don't even know if "they" used one or the other, or all of them combined!
1 There were several helicopters flying around this day 2 They did take close-up footage; why do you say they didn't? 3&4 Don't know what kind it is. Helicopters were IN the city, so they had faster access to the area. Also, read up on the FAA situation this day. This will give you more info on the whole fighter jet situation. LIke many events this day, this is still a situation that is confusing. 5 It's a real helicopter. There were several in the sky that day taking video.
Kill, in the extended clip after the impact, the alleged CGI helicopter enters from the left side of the screen. You didn't mention this. Was this a practice run as well or just a real helicopter entering the view? The record shows there was at least one helicopter in the immediate vicinity.
The nose out analysis.... fascinating! What do you think the perps were covering up with the CGI graphic? Missile? Drone? UAV? Guided Missile?
Exactly! Cause there are no helecopters flying around New York city on any given day anyway right? These no planers live in a totally fake world where nothing is as it seems and every bit of footage from anything must be fake because REAL planes could NOT have actually flown into the towers right? And there could be no helecopters flying around New York City right? Oh and don't forget those damn fake birds are the flying UAV's right?
Haha. Don't get me wrong. I believe the government is full of shit and I think they had everything to do with 9/11. But that's not a weird helicopter. It's just ... a helicopter. True, the no planers have a very far fetched story. But if you believe the plane theory I think it's healthy to toy with the notion of a no plane theory. What's to say there were ANY live shots that day? What if every amateur vid is a fake? Not likely. But it is possible whether people like to admit it or not.
your right, they just removed the towers in front of everyone and happened to have dead bodies there. go to any firefighter in ny or even anywhere in the us n say that it was fake and you will probably be dead too.
The weird thing is the pilot completely disregarded his safety, flew into the smoke; you can see the trail of smoke as he exits the smoke. And what purpose would it serve to film inside of smoke? Why did he fly into the smoke? Is he an idiot. Maybe. But I think it's important to ask those questions.
the majority of news pilots job is to "get the shot" they often risk alot for the better angle and or better position. Could be a manuever to a better location...
That the world around us is this big fake matrix we all think is real. And every piece of news footage is fake because planes did not fly into the twin towers. These big plane shaped holes just miraculously appeared in the buildings from some top secret cold fusion weapons. And if you believe any of this I got a building to sell you. Oh wait, the building is fake too....
I vote for NOT A REAL HELICOPTER / TV FAKERY TEST~! 5) Is it even a real helicopter, or is it a CGI insert testing out camera positioning before the 2nd hit grand finale?
Why are they there? Who is flying it? What did they have for breakfast? Why don't they tow a giant neon sign stating exactly what they're up to? Why don't they land on my front porch and bring me a bowl of Jell-o? Could they be going to the beach to meet with Elvis? If not - why? Was the smoke nerve gas called "Purple Nurple?" Why? Is it a CIA birdman meant to look like a helicopter? WhatWhenWhereHowWhy? If you deny any of the facts that I clearly stated hear THEN YOU ARE SHEEPLE IN DENIAL!
I fucking lol'd at the description.
mrmaster117 1 month ago
if an helicopter can fly enough near the smoke why they didnt rescue the victims with helicopers near to the windows?
digdug3520 2 months ago
Seriously, it's obviously not a helicopter. It's a Reptilian spacecraft with the queen of England on board. Wake up people. The Reptilians are here, only the penguin soldiers from the planet Mongo can save us, but they are being held captive in Area 51!
weelittledragon 5 months ago
Oh yea, very weird! Maybe it was Osama checking things out.
lorenavelvet 5 months ago
it was israeli mossud choppers along with our millitary choppers the goal was not to take pics or footage nor save lives it was simple control the area so they may trigger the secret weapons from a remote area to crumble the towers
chillyrooster 6 months ago
Oh for god sake, STOP making issues where NONE EXIST.... Whilst there were TV channel Helicopters in the air around the WTC incident, there was POLICE choppers on scene also. So stop getting in a fluster about the "Mysterious" chopper that was quite obviously, far beyond the two towers and due to the reqisite for safe flight would NOT have flown through the smoke.....
davetherave7 7 months ago
Comment removed
davetherave7 7 months ago
@jumpinhowlin Happy to give a chuckle.
Junior YouTube Detectives of various 911 beliefs (and Criminy, there's a lot of variation!) kept telling me to check out "this" vid or "that" because IT was the smoking gun which PROVED that [Jewish Lizardmen used a laser to vaporize the copper plating in the WTC or whatever was the truther's pet theory], so my comment must have been a reaction to the poster's "questions" which, like other conspiranoids' questions, are ever-unanswerable even if answered.
Darmesis 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It was NYPD helicopter and there are even few vids filmed from the chopper orbiting around the towers. Conspiracy theorists and other wacky treehuggers have talents to twist and bend even normal things to look like unnatural things.
R4wB0t 9 months ago
Comment removed
R4wB0t 9 months ago
Pointless.
adcashmo 9 months ago
why does the camera tilt like trying to hide something
chillyrooster 9 months ago
It's the news chopper:)
NowThePeople 10 months ago
What's the big deal, it could be anything. For all we know, it could be one of the many tour helicopters in NY who wanted a closer look, big woof.
getous 10 months ago
But the power structure, who has been responsible for educating the masses are well aware that these weak minded drones can be more then counted on to say things like "who cares if it's real or not, big whoop". These 'people' have lost, if they ever had, logical reasoning. They have been brought down to the level of instinctual animals. There 'minds' have been destroyed.
SlavesAreDisarmed 10 months ago
People trust their government and do not know how to apply logic. Yes, Killtown, you are correct, the Fox news helicopter was on the record as the 'first to get their' and that was from quite a distance to get the 9:02 nose out shot, wabc falsely claimed chopper 7 was on the seen at about 8:50 but when the anchor tried to communicate with the pilot no one answered and it was later proven the helicopter had to come from 14 miles away, the beginning of their film is right after the 2nd explosion
SlavesAreDisarmed 10 months ago
hey you got your video from Fox 5 :) DC lol
SkibopDaSequel 11 months ago
its the nypd helicopter the fottage is realsed now
davvvvo 1 year ago
someone in this news heli said "it seemed the point on the south tower was getting smaller. I told the pilot to go lower, but suddenly I realised that the WTC was falling to the ground."
kiwickle 1 year ago
@welcometokilltown
oh yes of course i must be stupid its obviously a osama bin laden heli planning to drop bombs on the firefighters -_-rly?
HowToHaloShow 1 year ago
*facepalm* its a news heli stupid.
HowToHaloShow 1 year ago 4
@HowToHaloShow Really? Please link me to the news coverage that "news heli" shot while passing the burning WTC, like it had somewhere better to go. I don't believe I ever saw it.
WelcomeToKilltown 1 year ago
@WelcomeToKilltown Ive seen it too, in a Swedish program about it. I dunno if its on youtube
MarNiRo08 1 year ago
@MarNiRo08 How could that helicopter fly past the WTC's at 8:59am and film the 2nd plane at 9:02am?
WelcomeToKilltown 1 year ago
@WelcomeToKilltown ehrm.. good point
MarNiRo08 1 year ago
@WelcomeToKilltown it is a news heli and we dont know wich station. u know how many stations probably had helis in the air? either way what asshole fly's though the smoke that coudlve easily takenout his engines
fuzzyrhino5 6 months ago
mossad did it
=nIH50KhpVWg
hoxran 1 year ago
why wont they rescue the people?
wg044154 1 year ago
@wg044154 HOW??????
Graphicstodiefor 1 year ago
can you say POLICE helicopter there were a lot of them around that day.
jerseycitybob 1 year ago
I estimate there was a lack of independent photography, and to me that indicates electromagnetic jamming was utilized. My question is, how is that electromagnetic jamming implemented over such a large area.
JZJYRWO 1 year ago
how was this footage taken goddamn it?
MrShimonhe 1 year ago
it's a fucking helicopter. are u serious?
da3coons 1 year ago
It was a police/fire helicopter that was hoping to land on the roof to rescue people that were still inside the buildings but above where the planes impacted. Officials knew those people couldn't get below the impact site using the stairs. It was determined they couldn't land because of the amount of smoke.
RossIris 1 year ago
Check up w w w. ae911truth. org
YousufM24 1 year ago
@Derekxnl I think, and this is just my guess, you were talking about relativity - things appearing to go faster at person A's perspective than, say for example, person B's position.
LoveAddictREmix 1 year ago
It's the ROFLCOPTER! SOI SOI SOI SOI
LoveAddictREmix 1 year ago
First off whats not understandable is how the government allowed those two planes to fly so low and so close to a city
HDTVWatch 1 year ago
pave low
BreffmintsMDV2010 1 year ago
nypd surveying the damage.
fireemt2b 1 year ago
oommgg i just wet myself
298linx 1 year ago
UFO
whitesbaseball4 1 year ago
i think..now this is just my theory that you need to get a life
1whatsupnow 1 year ago
its a ufo ahhhhhh!!!!!!!!!
MrSuperchrisx 1 year ago
if it is real it was a police chopper
doep007 1 year ago
Fuck me! hasnt anyone realized nothing and i mean nothing should have been in that airspace after the attack, only intercepters maybe
BrickUnit 1 year ago
@BrickUnit Remember, it took the FAA quite a while to ground all aircraft after the attack. Sure they'd still be flying... also consider the fact that they (rotary wing aircraft) don't have to file a flight plan unless they are above a certain altitude (usually 500 feet- but it varies from location to location).
Alloyaha 1 year ago
Well first of all the chopper is flying around the building aka "orbiting," likely assessing damage or getting news footage. Although it looks close, it's likely several hundred or a few thousand feet away from the building being pretty safe. Additionally it would be easy to beat the military there, especially with the tens of helipads scattered throughout New York. It's just another helicopter circling the WTC, this video was also taken from a chopper.
Alloyaha 2 years ago 8
Where's the news footage then?
If it was assessing damage, why is it flying so fast past it? How could they accurately assess the damage going so fast?
WelcomeToKilltown 1 year ago
I don't know where the footage is. You need to figure out whose chopper it is and do a little leg work from there. If they have a gyroscopically stabilized camera or FLIR EO Pod then they could assess damage quite easily at speed and distance. If you were a far ways away then it is easy to observe something static while moving fast. Consider how "slow" a jet-liner "appears" to move when at high altitude versus a lower altitude; it's all about relative distance and speed.
Alloyaha 1 year ago
@WelcomeToKilltown it wasnt going very fast at all. From a helicopter it's very easy t get a good look at something regardless of speed as long as the pilot is doing it right. And just because it was taking footage doesn't mean it was broadcast or even kept. It also could have simply been an NYPD unit orbiting and waiting for an order.
apoure25 1 year ago
@WelcomeToKilltown It's actually not flying that fast. From the perspective and angle we see it from it looks like it because we're comparing its size relative to the towers. It's a sort of optical illusion. I don't remember what it's called but I remember learning about it awhile ago in a Psychology class I took.
derekxnl 1 year ago
@WelcomeToKilltown, it is taking archive footage, a lot of which can be viewed in the documentary 102 Minutes that Changed America.
camster910 1 year ago
@WelcomeToKilltown most likely it was a civilian helecpter looking at what had just happened and they dont need to fly super slow
tractorman96 1 year ago
@WelcomeToKilltown Lets be an asshole and say it was planned by the us government because Aliens and Oil put them up to it. And Maybe hundreds of other assholes would believe it and create more of a problem in society with their skepticisms.
FlipGordon 1 year ago
@WelcomeToKilltown I've seen helicopter footage that would fit your description and speed type.
incinerator327 9 months ago
@WelcomeToKilltown
oki im 8 month late but if you search on youtube its a NYPD helicopter flying around.
HoldYourHeadUpAlex 5 months ago
@HoldYourHeadUpAlex If it was an NYPD helicopter, why did they fly by it like they had somewhere better to go?
WelcomeToKilltown 5 months ago
@WelcomeToKilltown
they where looking for the damages and they was trying to land on the roof but dident made it,search on youtube and you see the video...
HoldYourHeadUpAlex 5 months ago
@HoldYourHeadUpAlex It sure didn't look like it by how they just cruised on by.
WelcomeToKilltown 5 months ago
@Alloyaha but we know from other footage that the news choppers could not go inside a 5 mile radius....
organisten 1 year ago
I have taken into consideration actual evidence that is contrary to the published truth. Things like the maximum temperature of jet fuel, thermite burns on the steel columns, WTC 7, etc. But every time I hear about the CGI conspiracy I just shake my head.
AeronPrometheus 2 years ago
Maybe it's a news helicopter
JESSE75946 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That was David Rockefeller in the helicopter. He was to have breakfast with some Cantor Fitzgerald execs that morning at Top of the World Restaurant in WTC1, but was running "a little late."
Ciaresayton 2 years ago
That was David Rockefeller in that helicopter. He was supposed to have breakfast that morning at the Top of the World restaurant in WTC1 that morning, and was "running a little late."
Ciaresayton 2 years ago
good thing he was late
ReconBungie 2 years ago
he wouldn't have been screwed with it being at the top of the tower, he could have just got to the roof and flew away, if anything he could have saved sum ppl
tandown1000 2 years ago
whats weird about it then???
twardysimonward1 2 years ago
guys just face it!! 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!! YOU PEOPLE NEED TO WAKE UP AND DO SOMETHING BOUT IT!
djmilton78 2 years ago
yea it was george bush the botton for explosion was inside his story book he was reading to the children!!
failtolawl 2 years ago
Just face it! You are so desperate you will believe anything! Even lasers, dynamite, C4, Thermite and Missiles, and you are so confused because you smoke pot every day that you don't even know if "they" used one or the other, or all of them combined!
mlrs84 2 years ago
yup
skilledskater9 2 years ago
1 There were several helicopters flying around this day 2 They did take close-up footage; why do you say they didn't? 3&4 Don't know what kind it is. Helicopters were IN the city, so they had faster access to the area. Also, read up on the FAA situation this day. This will give you more info on the whole fighter jet situation. LIke many events this day, this is still a situation that is confusing. 5 It's a real helicopter. There were several in the sky that day taking video.
lng628 2 years ago 3
1) What was this helicopter doing?
NYPD AVIATION UNIT
2) Why didn't it take any close-up footage of the WTC burning?
IT DID
3) Is it military? If so, how did it beat the jet fighters to the scene before the 2nd hit?
NYPD AVIATION
4) If the dark helicopter was police or news, how did they beat the Air Force to the scene?
IT WAS BASED IN THE CITY
5) Is it even a real helicopter, or is it a CGI insert testing out camera positioning before the 2nd hit grand finale?
TWOOFERS
Denierbud11 2 years ago 3
Are you people serious? Fake helicoper? For God's sake, the videos that helicopter took can be seen right here on youtube if you bother to look.
optimusjd 2 years ago
The pilot was so brave, flying thru the smoke.
A lot of chopper pilots observe safety rules and don't do that!
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago 3
Kill, in the extended clip after the impact, the alleged CGI helicopter enters from the left side of the screen. You didn't mention this. Was this a practice run as well or just a real helicopter entering the view? The record shows there was at least one helicopter in the immediate vicinity.
The nose out analysis.... fascinating! What do you think the perps were covering up with the CGI graphic? Missile? Drone? UAV? Guided Missile?
swingdangler 3 years ago
and the way it shows at the other side through the smoke... it looks like it comes from the top of the building! now THATS some crappy FX!
xxGLhrMxx 3 years ago
another question:
why did the pilot fly through that stinky smoke instead of flying over or going around it?
were they testing the CGI behavior?
xxGLhrMxx 3 years ago
What's so weird about that?
bweazel 3 years ago
Exactly! Cause there are no helecopters flying around New York city on any given day anyway right? These no planers live in a totally fake world where nothing is as it seems and every bit of footage from anything must be fake because REAL planes could NOT have actually flown into the towers right? And there could be no helecopters flying around New York City right? Oh and don't forget those damn fake birds are the flying UAV's right?
freedomfan0801 3 years ago
Haha. Don't get me wrong. I believe the government is full of shit and I think they had everything to do with 9/11. But that's not a weird helicopter. It's just ... a helicopter. True, the no planers have a very far fetched story. But if you believe the plane theory I think it's healthy to toy with the notion of a no plane theory. What's to say there were ANY live shots that day? What if every amateur vid is a fake? Not likely. But it is possible whether people like to admit it or not.
bweazel 3 years ago
your right, they just removed the towers in front of everyone and happened to have dead bodies there. go to any firefighter in ny or even anywhere in the us n say that it was fake and you will probably be dead too.
gunnerman22 3 years ago
The weird thing is the pilot completely disregarded his safety, flew into the smoke; you can see the trail of smoke as he exits the smoke. And what purpose would it serve to film inside of smoke? Why did he fly into the smoke? Is he an idiot. Maybe. But I think it's important to ask those questions.
GMSkel 2 years ago
the majority of news pilots job is to "get the shot" they often risk alot for the better angle and or better position. Could be a manuever to a better location...
m1sterh0tsauc3 2 years ago
What do u wanna proof with that video?
Melonemelo 3 years ago
That the world around us is this big fake matrix we all think is real. And every piece of news footage is fake because planes did not fly into the twin towers. These big plane shaped holes just miraculously appeared in the buildings from some top secret cold fusion weapons. And if you believe any of this I got a building to sell you. Oh wait, the building is fake too....
freedomfan0801 3 years ago
another question...why did it just leave?
millionmom1 3 years ago
Uhhhh why would it stay? The guy had someplace to be....
freedomfan0801 3 years ago
Who cares if its real or not? a chopper flew by. big whoop.
08cagles 3 years ago 14
@08cagles haha seriously
stuwasraisedbywolves 1 year ago
I vote for NOT A REAL HELICOPTER / TV FAKERY TEST~! 5) Is it even a real helicopter, or is it a CGI insert testing out camera positioning before the 2nd hit grand finale?
bunny1hemp 3 years ago
Watch the white cirrus cloud the chopper flies in front of on the left of the screen.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Why are they there? Who is flying it? What did they have for breakfast? Why don't they tow a giant neon sign stating exactly what they're up to? Why don't they land on my front porch and bring me a bowl of Jell-o? Could they be going to the beach to meet with Elvis? If not - why? Was the smoke nerve gas called "Purple Nurple?" Why? Is it a CIA birdman meant to look like a helicopter? WhatWhenWhereHowWhy? If you deny any of the facts that I clearly stated hear THEN YOU ARE SHEEPLE IN DENIAL!
Darmesis 3 years ago 18
all i can say is... LOL
burnmuthafucka 3 years ago
why doesn't the helicopter blades disturb the smoke?
squibfreud 3 years ago
because there were too much smoke
XFrostFireX72 3 years ago
could be a press helicopter.
highway234 3 years ago