I know if you look up "hypocrite" in the dictionary KO's picture is next to the definition (with a smaller pic of Dean there as well) but.... whatever happened to Keith?
Olbermann is a puppet of George Soros, nothing more, and Soros is a Marxist Communist, which is quite like a Fascist. Big government controlled by big business, this is what we have now. Soon it will be Communist USSA if Obama has his way, with the spill as an excuse to push through CAP and TAX. His job creation program has been limited to government jobs, zero private sector. This is a clear sign of things to come, and they don't look good.
@Zaxxon2008 ......."EVERYTHING is BUSH's fault!!!!
it rained yesterday.... BUSH DID IT! BUSH DROWNS WORMS WITH EVIL Right-wing rains!! BUSH hates puppies and gives people CANCER! BUSH rapes trees and cuts down women!!"
@Zaxxon2008 ......."EVERYTHING is BUSH's fault!!!!
it rained yesterday.... BUSH DID IT! BUSH DROWNS WORMS WITH EVIL Right-wing rains!! BUSH hates puppies and gives people CANCER! BUSH rapes trees and cuts down women!!"
The difference between olberman and the republicans is that he is not paid to be a state representative, where the decorum for language and behavior is supposed to be professional.
with that said.............i say fuck it,.,.lol. politics abroad is way more entertaining.
Wow, quote-mining to make your point, seriously? At least Keith would do so with reason, he doesn't throw those words around, Faux News on the other hand, they have called Obama both a Nazi, a fascist, and a communist.
Hint: You can't both be a Nazi and a communist.
Keith responds to policies and statements, Fixed News does it as a matter of habit. Which is ironic, considering fascism is right-winged extremism.
Your instinct to vote my post down or mark it as spam just proves my point.
@F3YR3 .. I know it's been a month , you probably googled this by now and found out that you are wrong, but please show proof that FOX news EVER called obama a nazi, a fascist , or communist.. nevermind, don't bother you'll be wasting your time because it didn't, it never happened and it simply doesn't exist..
@F3YR3 How about commenting about how Howard Dean is saying what not to do and Olbermann does exactly the opposite! Wow! Talk about worshiping an idiot! This guy is a liberal, coummunist. He would love nothing more then the government to run everything and take all rights away (except his, of course)
if only MSNBC had shown Olbys slimey fat face when Howie Dean was saying that stuff... he must have had the biggest shit-eating grin on his fat slimey face
so Olby thinks Bush is a facist for things like rendition, the patriot act, fisa, and holding terrorists indefinitely. Well now that his messiah is president everything has been put right. Except for the small fact that Obama has continued those practices. I wonder why dolbermann never talks about that
@ars21689 Olbermann has express strong disappointment as have many others that Obama has NOT reversed many of the most odious, fascist policies and NOT directed the Justice department to gather evidence to arrest them and try them for treason. I know that I am very disappointed that Obama has not exposed the fact that Alberto Gonzales, the BUSH AG, in charge of the ENRON prosecution was himself an ENRON lawyer. Secrecy is the friend of Tyranny.
@ars21689 I have heard many negative comments from Olbermann about Obama on many issues, not just FISA. There is a strong sense of disappointment among progressives. He promised change and we have not seen much change. He has been too nice.
I'm not saying he hasn't criticized Obama at all, but that Obama has continued all of the Bush policies that caused Olbermann to say he was a nazi facist and he constantly criticized Bush night after night. I wasn't talking about Olbermann's position on health care and afghanistan
@ars21689 ANY repeat or continuation of ANY politician who continues the fascist poiicies of BUSH SHOULD be criticized. There is NO DOUBT that BUSH was as close to being a fascist as you can be without wearing a swastika. When I worked at ENRON, who was BUSH's NUMBER ONE supporter in 2000, I heard STRONG support of EUGENICS aka social darwinism aka the final solution aka the holocaust.
@Zaxxon2008 I see that you have been mislead in many ways. Since HITLER was the number one fascist of his day, can you explain why all his followers wore and displayed the Swastika?
The BUSH Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales who was in charge of the Enron prosecution was HIMSELF a former ENRON lawyer working for Vinson & Elkins exclusively on the ENRON account. Ken Lay recommended him to his good friend and ally, George BUSH, then TX gov. for appointment to the TX supreme court. His did.
and it was the early 1990's when - "Congress passed legislation to open up electricity sales to marketers... ENRON became one of the first companies to receive govt approval to sell electricity at market rate... In 94 ENRON... quickly dominated the US market" (New York Times)
that falls under both Democrat Congress, and the Clinton administration
btw, Alberto Gonzalez was also a board director at the United Way Gulf Coast division. that make him responsible for Katrina as well?
SO it took Ken Lay a little while to deceive the CA legislature and buy enough votes to get deregulation passed. It was REPUBLICANS who made that happen. Were you aware that the BUSH Sec. of the Army who let the NO BID contracts to Halliburton was Tom White, a former Enron exec. Robert Mosbacher, just died & he was an ENRON director and served as Sec of Commerce for BUSH 41.Wendy Gramm was making a million/year as an ENRON director & his husband PHIL (R-TX) wrote the ENRON loophole. UNHOLY GOP.
so basically what you are saying is... its all a conspiracy traced back to John Wilkes Boothe?!?!?!!!!
DAMN THEIR REBEL HIDES!!!!!
or are you saying Ruby didnt really kill Oswald & that it was really RUBY in the Tex School Book Depo!!!!!?!
let me submit this theory -
it was Professor Plum who killed Colonel Mustard, in the Library, with the lead pipe! and all this as Miss Scarlet watched on in GLEE! FOR SHAME madam, for shame.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@Zaxxon2008 So when fascist lose all hope and credibility, when they have no evidence and no reliability left, they run for the hills of sarcasm.
The facts are that I worked at Enron directly with the senior executives and I met and witnessed the events that I testify about. Now if you want to play some stupid board game, I suggest you find some kid to play with. I work with adults to tell the truth and improve the nation.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@Zaxxon2008 WRONG! The facts are the facts. You can live in your own dillusional world but you cannot have your own facts.
What makes ME weep is that your fantasies may be contagious. I do not care if you hide in your closet repeating your lies to yourself over and over, but I WILL NOT allow you to spew them on the net without challenge.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@Zaxxon2008 So let me get your rant straight. YOU say that because Hitler caused the holocaust we should NOT have executed the right wing terrorists that blew up the Oklahoma City Federal building? Please explain your total disregard of the facts in trying to use the mass murders of Mao and Stalin to excuse the crimes of BUSH?
Clearly you are a waste of bandwidth and I ONLY respond to show the other people who view this how stupid you are.
i am not using the crimes of Mao & Stalin to "excuse the crimes of BUSH" you fool
it is quite clear from everything you have stated.....
EVERYTHING is BUSH's fault!!!!
it rained yesterday.... BUSH DID IT! BUSH DROWNS WORMS WITH EVIL Right-wing rains!! BUSH hates puppies and gives people CANCER! BUSH rapes trees and cuts down women!!!
@Zaxxon2008 ......."EVERYTHING is BUSH's fault!!!!
it rained yesterday.... BUSH DID IT! BUSH DROWNS WORMS WITH EVIL Right-wing rains!! BUSH hates puppies and gives people CANCER! BUSH rapes trees and cuts down women!!"
@Zaxxon2008 I have done work with the Gulf Coast United Way and Gonzales was a NO SHOW, only there for poltiical purposes. Don't you remember that the TORTURE Attorney General was in line for a BUSH Supreme Court appointment? What a nightmare THAT would be.
@Zaxxon2008 The crimes at ENRON began NOT in 1996 as you claim but almost immediately after Ken Lay seized power there in 1985. I was in the room when the BOD voted him in power. Lay's first crime was covering up the $400 billion dollar fraud by Belco petroleum. Second was the $180 million dollar embezzlement of the Enron trading company in Valhalla, NY. BOTH during the REAGAN DEREGULATION of business and his failed economic policies. For YOU, DENIAL is far, FAR MORE than a river in Egypt.
Hitler led the National Socialists (NAZI) ergo, swastika is a socialist symbol, not a fascist one. Benito Mussolini was a fascist. Hitler was a socialist
i did NOT claim ENRONs crimes started in 96, i said 96 was when they first began overstating their income by $600bil
it was AG John Ashcroft who began proceedings against ENRON, not Gonzalez
tho Gonzalez WAS AG in 2006, when Ken Lay was convicted, but not in 04 when he was indicted
@Zaxxon2008 It was Gonzales who gave HUNDREDS of Enron executives a pass on the crimes of ENRON. TWO examples are Tom White, the BUSH SEC. of the Army who let the Halliburton NO BID contracts AND Rich Kinder who was BUSH #2 contributor in 2000 behind Ken Lay who was #1. Most of the TX politicians owe their success to ENRON STOLEN MONEY such as Tom DeLay, Phil Gramm, Kay Bailey Hutchinson, John Cornyn and Dick Armey. AND Gonzales was influential in ruling the Cliff Baxter MURDER, a suicide.
@Zaxxon2008 Cliff Baxter was found in his car a block from his house dead. Shot with untraceable bird shot, with a UNSIGNED hand printed suicide note, the day before he was to be deposed by the Gonzales Justice Department. The autopsy says that to cause the wound pattern that he had, Baxter held the gun five feet from his head. Baxter had a asphalt brush on his arm as if he had fallen on the pavement. He was murdered in Tom DeLay's hometown. Baxter was the ONLY Enron exec to have remorse.
@ars21689 You need to be listening to be able to hear Olbermanns MANY criticism of the failure of Obama to reverse the fascist policies of BUSH and to arrest and try the BUSHIES for TREASON.
Olbermann can't even debate his hero because he was not reading from the teleprompter supplied from the White House. Just a mumbling, stumbling mashed up bag of human fat.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"If you're going to call someone a fascist, lay out your case." Funny how Olbermann's case was conveniently cut out of this video. Bush was creating a corporate state, which is the definition of fascism.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
His defense was left out of this video, I've seen the original. This video makes it appear that Olbermann is just a rabid hater of Bush, with no justification. And he wasn't in that video.
Give me a fucking break. Makes it look like Olbermann is just a rabid hater of Bush? Well that is what he is, douchebag. He has claimed Bush is worse than the terrorists. There is no fucking defense for it. Hell, he has even claimed that Fox News has done more damage than the Taliban. No amount of video in the fucking world can explain that away asshole, regardless of how many of Keith's ten viewers claim it can.
You are a complete fucking moron. So according to you, Bush was a fascist because he was making the US a corporate state, but the guy who initiated a government takeover of multiple banks, GM and Chrysler is not a fascist? Nice to see intellectual consistency isn't your strong suit. Of course, I knew that the second you said you were a libertarian voting for Obama. Because, obviously, a libertarian would support the most statist presidential candidate since FDR, and maybe ever.
ah yes the corporate state, well at least you realize that that is a key element of fascism which so few on the left, right, and center realize but alas it has been obama who has done even larger gov't intrusions into private banks and most fascist like of all is the gov't taking partial ownership of GM. if by bush's fascism you mean accepting corp donations and being friendly to donors that is age old and even obambi does that just look at his donor records.
We intruded in those companies because we bailed them out, and basically owned them. Take for example AIG, we own the majority of it, therefor we can make the rules. This is commonplace in a capitalist system that the majority holders of a company make the rules.
it is commonplace in capitalism for PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS to own parts of corps and make "the rules" which of course would have to comply with gov't rules like sec regs but the gov't should never own part of private companies. if you've noticed the AIG corps are making profits again and still paying large bonuses to their CEOs and pple are mad about it but we should be surprised since banks give heavily to many candidates such as barney frank and chris dodd. lets break that unholy bond.
you do make a good point that we took a majority stake in the company but i will say that we should never have done that in the first place. gov'ts like soviet russia that owned/operated almost all industries produced sh** products like the car yugo and despite the USSR having way more natural resources than a place like Japan, they simply couldn't produce near the output for the same amount of input. The inherent problem is that gov't is insulated from market forces bc it need not make profits
I agree, we shouldn't have bailed them out in the first place. I'm not here to defend Obama, I am a libertarian. While I did vote for Obama, it was because I couldn't vote for Ron Paul because he wasn't on the ticket. There are systems in place for dealing with insolvent banks, which we did not use.
You are a libertarian? You couldn't vote for Ron Paul so you voted for Obama? You are a libertarian? Because when I can't vote for Paul, I am obviously going to vote for the most far-left, statist candidate in United States history. Here is a tip saiochi, no one fucking believes you are a libertarian.
Yes, because being a libertarian means if your candidate doesn't get the republican nomination, that you should just vote for the one who does. Right? Oh wait, that's not how it works. I voted for Obama because I am a LEFT-LEANING libertarian. Yes, we exist. Now shut the fuck up, please.
Hey dipshit, you are either a libertarian or you support a candidate who calls for a vast expansion of the power of the state. What are you going to do next, claim you are a capitalist who believes in a centralized economy?
These two fucking clowns on name-calling? This is a joke right? These are actors right? They've been calling people names for years in Michigan, in Montana, in Iowa, in Delaware, in Nevada, in Kansas, and Washington DC, weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee-oooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhh !!!!!!!!
This mindless robot reads and reports garbage from left wing blogs as fact from a teleprompter. Bring in a "live" person with an opposing point of view, cut the teleprompter and see how Olbermann handles it. Oh wait, you just saw what happened...he is totally out of his element and could not defend any of his statements. I bet he went home and sat in the bath tub for days weeping about what a HACK he really is.
Olbermann got owned. One of his buddies makes an excellent point and Olby can't defend his actions...just stumbles over his words. That's why he doesn't debate anyone...because you can't debate while reading from a teleprompter. What a joke!!!!
Dean was correct. We should remember that we are all Americans first. You can disagree without being disagreeable. Keith has not figured that out yet. The CEO of GE, Jerry Zucker, must like him. Obama and Zucker have close ties in the new cap and trade business model.
Was Dean commenting on Olby's statements, or was it just a coincidence? In other words, was Dean trying to destroy Olby or did it just remind OlbyWatch of things that Olby had said in the past ("fascism" etc...)?
@brad90956 HGWT5763. 02/10/25/2010 A.D. HOWARD DEAN DID NO SUCH THING-K.O. JUST CALLED THEM AS HE SAW THEM-GEORGE WALKER BUSH,WARMONGER,THE THIEF THAT STOLE THE WHITE HOUSE-APPARENTLY WHAT WEJUST SAW WAS SPLICED AND EDITED SIDEWAYS,SORT OF,WAY TO GO,K.O.!
Are you serious?! Under President Obamas proposed budget, our deficit will hit $1.8 trillion this year — quadrupling the 2008 record shortfall and amounting to 13.1 percent of the countrys entire economic output. The CBO has projected $9.3 trillion in deficits over the next 10 yrs. That is $2.3 trillion worse than the Obama administrations early predictions, $1 trillion per year until 2019, 4 times as much as President Bushs deficits.
o Israel has killed Americans (eg. Sailors on USS Liberty, Rachel Corrie, etc...)
o Israel spies on this country.
o Israel blackmails our corrupt politicians.
o Israel steals our taxes.
o Israel uses our country as their toilet.
For more info, click my UsedID then browse my informative Israel playlist.
Please distribute this post and tell your Senator and/or Representative about Israel's killing Americans, heinous crimes, stealing our taxes, and its spying on USA. Peace!
What does he mean, "If somebody had called President Bush dreadful names like that, I would have said 'Look, we disagree with President Bush - strongly - and he's wrong about the war in Iraq, for example, or the huge deficits that he ran up, but he is the President and we are going to be respectful of him." He's one to be talking about "huge deficits" - Obama has surpassed everyone, and President Bush was called every name in the book - and some new ones. Besides, Obama is a fascist.
OK, let me see if I can explain.....this was about Olby being made to look like a fool by Howard Dean. I pointed out that Dean had shown class and mentioned that this was a trait obviously foreign to Olby. I didn't mention opinion or say the shows shouldn't have opinion etc.....please read the lead up to what another person and I were discussing and you will see that you are way out of line. It only takes a few minutes...start from the beginning OK?
To believe there is a significant difference between the antics, legal and otherwise, of the two parties is to simply label yourself as suffering from selective memory. From the beginning of the two party system, the actions of those in power have served, at times, to amuse and at other times sicken. Two sides of the same coin is a great way to sum it up.
Either find Democratic legal transgressions that compare to those I listed for the Republicans, or go back to watching South Park.
Republicans and Democrats are not the same parties they were in the 1800s so any discussion that inclued "from the beginning of the two party system" is a different (though valid and interesting) discussion. Let's talk since 1964, an appropriate watershed year for both parties.
What is "SouthPark"? Haven't had the pleasure. Anyway........all that you list are simply opinion. Oh there have been many that maintained just what you say but again, more opinion. When someone of legitimate stature (and I don't mean some liberal, left wing writer or talking head) proves your statements then you will have my apology. Lets use the Supreme Court as a standard huh? This posting was about KO and more importantly, the words of the former head of the DNC. Not Bush.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This would be funny and appropriate if Republicans and Democrats were two sides of the same coin. They're not. Republicans really did pursue unitary power for the (Republican) executive, they really did trample Constitutional rights, and they really did rig elections. Democrats have done none of these things. Thus Keith is correct to apply the "fascist" label to Republicans, and those who address Democrats with that perjorative really ought to rethink their positions.
You have to give Dean his due in this one. He showed "Class" in this instance if not always. "...he is the President and we're going to be respectful of him"
Good Idea and a concept that Olby can't seem to understand.
man he seems to be obsessed with glen beck and bill oreilly. why doesnt he stop advertising people like oreilly and hannity and start having people in his program who can bring the other point of view. atleast chris mathews tries to bring the people who disagrees with him
so now that democrats are in office , they cant call the republicans or Bush any more names, but also they forbid any at Obama.. ha! boy are they syupid.. i call olberman a fucking douchebag on zanex
After all this chattering bullshit and pathetic talking points (lol Clinton rode the Reagan boom while we had a recession in 91-92... riiiiight, LBJ rode JFK tax cuts that weren't even implemented under JFK presidency? WTF!).
You idiots can't explain the fact that FDR had 8% average growth, JFK-LBJ 5.5% and Clinton 3.6%? The only post war Democrat to do worse than Reagan's 3.4% was Carter (at 3.3% hardly worse) and Truman's elected term (he did have massive growth in his first 'term' though).
Reagans tax cuts gave rise to the R&D that led to the tech boom that fueled the economy in the 90s' Clinton had nothing to do with it except for slowing it down with tax increases in 1993 and then speeding it up with tax cuts (a conservative approach) in 1997 with the help of the GOP Congress.
"LBJ rode JFK tax cuts that weren't even implemented under JFK presidency? WTF!)."
They were passed in 1962 and went into full effect in 1964, right as LBJ's presidency was beginning. LBJ rode the wave.
You said it yourself it's a post recession bounce. JFk had 5.5% growth which again is twice what Reagan had.
And for the last time WHAT IS IT ABOUT WW2 THAT PRODUCED AN ECONOMIC BOOM? It's almost uncanny how systematically you two dolts have avoided that question.
"You said it yourself it's a post recession bounce."
That started WELL BEFORE JFK's term started. He had nothing to do with a bounce that happened two years before he took office. And not to nitpick but JFK averaged 5.1% growth.
"And for the last time WHAT IS IT ABOUT WW2 THAT PRODUCED AN ECONOMIC BOOM?"
Are you kidding me? Wars are economic boons. Seriously, are you so stupid that you have to ask this question?
And who PAYS for those jobs? Oh yes THE GOVERNMENT! You idiot. Bullets are not magic in fact FDR could have created a wartime economy without a war. It would haver had the same economic effect (an economic boom and giant deficits). It is in principle an admission by you that conservatism has failed. Thank you.
Of course without a war it makes more sense to create things that have some utility and economic value. Like roads and infrastructure. Note: this only works in a depressed economy.
Sorry, skippy....You walked right into the admission. What we have said all along. WW2 was the recovery. Not his failed policies for the previous years. You Lose. As always.
"None of this changes the facts that FDR's new deal produced stronger growth than any president since. "
That's just it, his New Deal didn't produce any economic growth. 6 years later and unemployment was still in the stratosphere and the economy was in another recession. The New Deal leveraged us to the hilt.
Public debt in 1933: 22.5 Billion
Public debt in 1941: 48.9 Billion
Even FDR's own Treasury Secretay admitted that the New Deal was a huge boondoggle.
"That's just it, his New Deal didn't produce any economic growth. 6 years later and unemployment was still in the stratosphere and the economy was in another recession. The New Deal leveraged us to the hilt."
5.5% GDP growth pear year you idiot. You can yap your trap all you want nothing changes that. FDR makes Reagan look like the b-list actor he was. And so did Kennedy, LBJ and Clinton.
"Still what do you have to say for the fact that FDR had 8% average growth, JFK-LBJ 5.5% and Clinton 3.6%?"
FDR averaged 8% because of WWII, JFK had 5.5% because of his tax cuts. LBJ just road off of that tidal wave. Reagan's 3.5% growth was miraculous considering the mess Carter left him. Remember Carter? His admin. gave us the term "Misery Index".
Clinton rode off of the tech boom created by Reagan's tax cuts. Crediting Clinton for the economy is like crediting a rooster for the sunrise.
FDR had 8% average growth, JFK-LBJ 5.5% and Clinton 3.6%? The only post war Democrat to do worse than Reagan's 3.4% was Carter (at 3.3% hardly worse) and Truman's elected term (he did have massive growth in his first 'term' though).
JFK's tax cuts, the Vietnam War and the post 1958 recession boom. Check GDP growth for 1959 and 1960. It's actually higher than 1961 and 1962.
" Clinton 3.6%? "
We already went over this. Repeating the same bullshit stat without examining the reasons behind it does you no good.
Reagan's 3.4% was amazing considering the mess that was handed to him by Carter. It was only 3.4% in REAL dollars is because inflation was so high (thanks to Carter).
"Reagan's 3.4% was amazing considering the mess that was handed to him by Carter. It was only 3.4% in REAL dollars is because inflation was so high (thanks to Carter)."
That Carter figure of 3.3% growth was also inflation adjusted.
Reagan economic program took effect in 1982, the economy took off , growing at an average annual rate of 4.3%. As a comparison, average annual growth for the twelve years from 1990-2001 (since Reagan) was 2.95%, for 1991-2001 (previous trough to peak) it was 3.05% and for 1992-2001 (the last expansion) it was 3.4%.
The average growth for the eight Clinton years was 3.55%, and it was part of the last expansion period.
Olberman is a JOKE! look at the ratings! Just released! FOX RULES!
Fox remains on a mountain above its two closest competitors, with its prime-time audience in March more than that of MSNBC and CNN combined. "The O'Reilly Factor" has done particularly well, keeping more of its postelection audience than anything else on CNN and MSNBC.
Through Wednesday, Fox was averaging 2.73 million prime-time viewers in March. MSNBC had 1.16 million and CNN had 1.14 million.
olberdouche! lol! what an idiot. our cable network in NY has a blackout at 8PM on MSNBC every Mon-Fri so I can't see this on tv---and i'm not complaining.
Good point. Olbermann's entire show is misinformation, deception, & misleading his audience. He seems unstable psychologically and is filled with hate with anyone that disagrees with him. He is a radical and is totally incapable of any thoughtful dialogue. One has to wonder why MSNBC and NBC keeps this guy on the air with his extremely low ratings? But more importantly- Olbermann is dangerous. There are naive , young, impressionable people out there that actually listen & believe his rantings.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
what a pathetic editing job... that is all this robert cox moron does in his videos when he obsesses over olbermann.
if anything, i think this proves the point of olbermann's guests disagreeing with him. the last part of the segment where they were talking about calling bush a fascist, it was obvious dean didnt agree with him, and he laid it out simply without attacking keith. im sure he knows keith said that about bush, but its an opinion, so there would be no reason to attack him on it.
Editing job ? Sorry--save that for MediaMatters. And Center for American progress. (A group who saw fit last week to harass a rape victim just because Bill O supported her- after Bill's words were taken out of context)
Guess Keith didn't say those things ? Whom was he calling a fascist? Seems like you admitted it in your last paragraph.
The former HEAD of the DNC disagrees with him on "fascist" -and you lump that into ALL guests disagreeing with him.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
yeah thats right... robert cox linked the beg of the interview with the end when keith brought up calling a pres. fascist. media matters has never pulled the shit cox does in his fucking videos... they show full video context. can you prove otherwise? please... are you a fucking moron? took oreilly out of context? lmao... what because terkel didnt mention the mel gibson part? that doesnt even do anything to prove the point. and how did they harass the rape victim? they didnt even bring up alexa.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i never said keith didnt call bush a fascist... its obvious he did, and im sure dean knows he did. so wtf are you talking about? there is nothing to admit.
no, i dont lump that into all of his guests disagreeing with him... that is one of many, many times that guests have disagreed with him. just because they arent yelling back at him, doesnt mean there is no disagreement.
basically, you are an idiot who believes the bullshit that oreilly tells you complaining he got smeared. lol so typical.
That's Olby's favorite technique, leading the witness. His ego can't handle being challenged, so he tries to lead his guests to safe turf.
But Dean didn't follow Keith's lead, and that's what made this interview so great. For once, we got some candor, and Keith was shown as the tool he is.
Nice. Just very nice.
dbsommers1 3 months ago
Even Glenn Beck is open to debate. That's really saying something.
Dondarhosen 5 months ago
I know if you look up "hypocrite" in the dictionary KO's picture is next to the definition (with a smaller pic of Dean there as well) but.... whatever happened to Keith?
romanticwarrior97 6 months ago
I never thought I would say this, but I agree with ole Dean here. Olby's a fucking douche.
orangeblood307 6 months ago
@Boostnitup, since you mention it, so, who the fv(#ing you?!
CaraC3xDPPxWbless 7 months ago
what's funnier? Olby saying fascist or Dean's scream?
ChargersFan08 1 year ago
Keith Overbite: "Is there something of a double standard here?"
Oh, gosh...ya THINK?
RushLimborg 1 year ago
Douche
bobbelafonte 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
two assholes
REXROTH61 1 year ago
HAHAHAHAH Kettle calling Pot "BLACK" right?
This is why "BATH Tub Boy" is irrelevent.
Boostnitup 1 year ago
Really great clip resonating a core insane over-the-top side of Olbermann. This should be the front page of Huffington Post.
FritzOmnibus 1 year ago
This is hillarious. Olby is dying here.
agnostaxian 1 year ago 4
Olbermann is a puppet of George Soros, nothing more, and Soros is a Marxist Communist, which is quite like a Fascist. Big government controlled by big business, this is what we have now. Soon it will be Communist USSA if Obama has his way, with the spill as an excuse to push through CAP and TAX. His job creation program has been limited to government jobs, zero private sector. This is a clear sign of things to come, and they don't look good.
TheKickerboy99 1 year ago 5
@TheKickerboy99 You're dead right about that.
orangeblood307 6 months ago
Ok now what do you call the Oliely and the rest of the hate mongers of the far right
1961arnie 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Zaxxon2008 ......."EVERYTHING is BUSH's fault!!!!
it rained yesterday.... BUSH DID IT! BUSH DROWNS WORMS WITH EVIL Right-wing rains!! BUSH hates puppies and gives people CANCER! BUSH rapes trees and cuts down women!!"
DONT YOU FORGET IT BITCH
nrgetick 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Zaxxon2008 ......."EVERYTHING is BUSH's fault!!!!
it rained yesterday.... BUSH DID IT! BUSH DROWNS WORMS WITH EVIL Right-wing rains!! BUSH hates puppies and gives people CANCER! BUSH rapes trees and cuts down women!!"
AND DONT YOU FORGET IT BITCH
nrgetick 1 year ago
The difference between olberman and the republicans is that he is not paid to be a state representative, where the decorum for language and behavior is supposed to be professional.
with that said.............i say fuck it,.,.lol. politics abroad is way more entertaining.
nrgetick 1 year ago
Wow, quote-mining to make your point, seriously? At least Keith would do so with reason, he doesn't throw those words around, Faux News on the other hand, they have called Obama both a Nazi, a fascist, and a communist.
Hint: You can't both be a Nazi and a communist.
Keith responds to policies and statements, Fixed News does it as a matter of habit. Which is ironic, considering fascism is right-winged extremism.
Your instinct to vote my post down or mark it as spam just proves my point.
F3YR3 1 year ago
@F3YR3 .. I know it's been a month , you probably googled this by now and found out that you are wrong, but please show proof that FOX news EVER called obama a nazi, a fascist , or communist.. nevermind, don't bother you'll be wasting your time because it didn't, it never happened and it simply doesn't exist..
nockuout1 1 year ago
@F3YR3 How about commenting about how Howard Dean is saying what not to do and Olbermann does exactly the opposite! Wow! Talk about worshiping an idiot! This guy is a liberal, coummunist. He would love nothing more then the government to run everything and take all rights away (except his, of course)
rocsalt 1 year ago 2
LMFAO,This is great.Olberman is such a hypocritical fucking moron.
jays2474 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Well Dick Cheney is a fascist... Bush was not, he was just a puppet. In fact each time he did not heard Cheney's idea, he made the right choice.
Melpheos1er 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
those are classic cut-ins. you could be editing segments for fixed news.
12esinlung 1 year ago
Bathtub boy has the biggest crush on Bill O'reilly. He can't get through a single show without mentioning his name.
nhenry87 1 year ago 7
no matter what tho, exenrontexas, you avoid the content of this video in preference for your BDS
Olbermann gets OWNED, EXPOSED, PLAYED, FILLETED
BDS is contagious!!! to avoid contracting BDS, maintain intelligence, avoid liberal propaganda & idiocy, and wash your hands frequently
Zaxxon2008 2 years ago 5
this video is priceless
if only MSNBC had shown Olbys slimey fat face when Howie Dean was saying that stuff... he must have had the biggest shit-eating grin on his fat slimey face
Zaxxon2008 2 years ago 3
you don't reach reach the moderate middle by calling those who disagree with obama racist
DICK DEAN
SHAMSHAM1090 2 years ago 2
so Olby thinks Bush is a facist for things like rendition, the patriot act, fisa, and holding terrorists indefinitely. Well now that his messiah is president everything has been put right. Except for the small fact that Obama has continued those practices. I wonder why dolbermann never talks about that
ars21689 2 years ago 4
@ars21689 Olbermann has express strong disappointment as have many others that Obama has NOT reversed many of the most odious, fascist policies and NOT directed the Justice department to gather evidence to arrest them and try them for treason. I know that I am very disappointed that Obama has not exposed the fact that Alberto Gonzales, the BUSH AG, in charge of the ENRON prosecution was himself an ENRON lawyer. Secrecy is the friend of Tyranny.
exenrontexas 2 years ago
I've only heard him say one thing about FISA and Obama and it was before he was elected
ars21689 2 years ago 4
@ars21689 I have heard many negative comments from Olbermann about Obama on many issues, not just FISA. There is a strong sense of disappointment among progressives. He promised change and we have not seen much change. He has been too nice.
exenrontexas 2 years ago
I'm not saying he hasn't criticized Obama at all, but that Obama has continued all of the Bush policies that caused Olbermann to say he was a nazi facist and he constantly criticized Bush night after night. I wasn't talking about Olbermann's position on health care and afghanistan
ars21689 2 years ago 4
@ars21689 ANY repeat or continuation of ANY politician who continues the fascist poiicies of BUSH SHOULD be criticized. There is NO DOUBT that BUSH was as close to being a fascist as you can be without wearing a swastika. When I worked at ENRON, who was BUSH's NUMBER ONE supporter in 2000, I heard STRONG support of EUGENICS aka social darwinism aka the final solution aka the holocaust.
exenrontexas 2 years ago
the swastika was a socialist symbol, not a fascist one
for being Bush's "number one supporter in 2000" it was Bush's Justice Dept. and SEC that brought the case against Enron
and it was 1996-2001 when Enron overstated its earnings by almost $600bil
but those facts are a minor nuisance to those suffering from BDS
Zaxxon2008 2 years ago 3
@Zaxxon2008 I see that you have been mislead in many ways. Since HITLER was the number one fascist of his day, can you explain why all his followers wore and displayed the Swastika?
The BUSH Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales who was in charge of the Enron prosecution was HIMSELF a former ENRON lawyer working for Vinson & Elkins exclusively on the ENRON account. Ken Lay recommended him to his good friend and ally, George BUSH, then TX gov. for appointment to the TX supreme court. His did.
exenrontexas 2 years ago
and it was the early 1990's when - "Congress passed legislation to open up electricity sales to marketers... ENRON became one of the first companies to receive govt approval to sell electricity at market rate... In 94 ENRON... quickly dominated the US market" (New York Times)
that falls under both Democrat Congress, and the Clinton administration
btw, Alberto Gonzalez was also a board director at the United Way Gulf Coast division. that make him responsible for Katrina as well?
LOL @ U
Zaxxon2008 2 years ago 5
SO it took Ken Lay a little while to deceive the CA legislature and buy enough votes to get deregulation passed. It was REPUBLICANS who made that happen. Were you aware that the BUSH Sec. of the Army who let the NO BID contracts to Halliburton was Tom White, a former Enron exec. Robert Mosbacher, just died & he was an ENRON director and served as Sec of Commerce for BUSH 41.Wendy Gramm was making a million/year as an ENRON director & his husband PHIL (R-TX) wrote the ENRON loophole. UNHOLY GOP.
exenrontexas 2 years ago
@exenrontexas
so basically what you are saying is... its all a conspiracy traced back to John Wilkes Boothe?!?!?!!!!
DAMN THEIR REBEL HIDES!!!!!
or are you saying Ruby didnt really kill Oswald & that it was really RUBY in the Tex School Book Depo!!!!!?!
let me submit this theory -
it was Professor Plum who killed Colonel Mustard, in the Library, with the lead pipe! and all this as Miss Scarlet watched on in GLEE! FOR SHAME madam, for shame.
it makes me weep :''( :''(''''
Zaxxon2008 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Zaxxon2008 So when fascist lose all hope and credibility, when they have no evidence and no reliability left, they run for the hills of sarcasm.
The facts are that I worked at Enron directly with the senior executives and I met and witnessed the events that I testify about. Now if you want to play some stupid board game, I suggest you find some kid to play with. I work with adults to tell the truth and improve the nation.
Goodbye, moron.
exenrontexas 2 years ago
more like when all else fails, and all you have is conspiracy theories & self loathing, you end up mocked and resort to name calling
it almost makes me weep :''(
almost
Olbermann gets PWND!!!
Zaxxon2008 2 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Zaxxon2008 WRONG! The facts are the facts. You can live in your own dillusional world but you cannot have your own facts.
What makes ME weep is that your fantasies may be contagious. I do not care if you hide in your closet repeating your lies to yourself over and over, but I WILL NOT allow you to spew them on the net without challenge.
exenrontexas 2 years ago
ROFL
'WRONG!'
also LOL @ copying 'weep'
blame Bush blame Bush blame Bush!!!
Mao killed millions, Stalin killed millions, Jack the Ripper killed women... BLAME BUSH!!!
AAAAAaaarrrrrgggghhhhhh!!! i just cant blame Bush enough because i'm so ignorantly liberal!!!! its like halitosis of the mind
bwahahahahaaaa
Zaxxon2008 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Zaxxon2008 So let me get your rant straight. YOU say that because Hitler caused the holocaust we should NOT have executed the right wing terrorists that blew up the Oklahoma City Federal building? Please explain your total disregard of the facts in trying to use the mass murders of Mao and Stalin to excuse the crimes of BUSH?
Clearly you are a waste of bandwidth and I ONLY respond to show the other people who view this how stupid you are.
exenrontexas 2 years ago
@exenrontexas
i am not using the crimes of Mao & Stalin to "excuse the crimes of BUSH" you fool
it is quite clear from everything you have stated.....
EVERYTHING is BUSH's fault!!!!
it rained yesterday.... BUSH DID IT! BUSH DROWNS WORMS WITH EVIL Right-wing rains!! BUSH hates puppies and gives people CANCER! BUSH rapes trees and cuts down women!!!
i mock you openly and with aplomb
Zaxxon2008 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Zaxxon2008 Your are only showing your own stupidity and lack of shame.
But I am not surprised since the followers of Bush used the same logic to get American into two unwinnable, expensive wars. Let's see how he did it:
Osama attacks America so we invade Iraq. Large corporations rape America so we give them money.
THAT is your idea of logic and the whole GOP worships him.
You are a deceiver and a fool and haven't got the brains that God gave a goose.
exenrontexas 2 years ago
i'm not a deciever
i'm the decider
fool me once, shame on you
fool me twice... you dont get to fool me again
and you fool noone
you are an epic failure
isnt it past your nap time, grandpa
Zaxxon2008 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
@Zaxxon2008 ......."EVERYTHING is BUSH's fault!!!!
it rained yesterday.... BUSH DID IT! BUSH DROWNS WORMS WITH EVIL Right-wing rains!! BUSH hates puppies and gives people CANCER! BUSH rapes trees and cuts down women!!"
AND DONT YOU FORGET IT BITCH
nrgetick 1 year ago
@Zaxxon2008 I have done work with the Gulf Coast United Way and Gonzales was a NO SHOW, only there for poltiical purposes. Don't you remember that the TORTURE Attorney General was in line for a BUSH Supreme Court appointment? What a nightmare THAT would be.
exenrontexas 2 years ago
@Zaxxon2008 The crimes at ENRON began NOT in 1996 as you claim but almost immediately after Ken Lay seized power there in 1985. I was in the room when the BOD voted him in power. Lay's first crime was covering up the $400 billion dollar fraud by Belco petroleum. Second was the $180 million dollar embezzlement of the Enron trading company in Valhalla, NY. BOTH during the REAGAN DEREGULATION of business and his failed economic policies. For YOU, DENIAL is far, FAR MORE than a river in Egypt.
exenrontexas 2 years ago
@exenrontexas
where to start on your ignorance?
Hitler led the National Socialists (NAZI) ergo, swastika is a socialist symbol, not a fascist one. Benito Mussolini was a fascist. Hitler was a socialist
i did NOT claim ENRONs crimes started in 96, i said 96 was when they first began overstating their income by $600bil
it was AG John Ashcroft who began proceedings against ENRON, not Gonzalez
tho Gonzalez WAS AG in 2006, when Ken Lay was convicted, but not in 04 when he was indicted
Zaxxon2008 2 years ago 2
@Zaxxon2008 It was Gonzales who gave HUNDREDS of Enron executives a pass on the crimes of ENRON. TWO examples are Tom White, the BUSH SEC. of the Army who let the Halliburton NO BID contracts AND Rich Kinder who was BUSH #2 contributor in 2000 behind Ken Lay who was #1. Most of the TX politicians owe their success to ENRON STOLEN MONEY such as Tom DeLay, Phil Gramm, Kay Bailey Hutchinson, John Cornyn and Dick Armey. AND Gonzales was influential in ruling the Cliff Baxter MURDER, a suicide.
exenrontexas 2 years ago
@Zaxxon2008 Cliff Baxter was found in his car a block from his house dead. Shot with untraceable bird shot, with a UNSIGNED hand printed suicide note, the day before he was to be deposed by the Gonzales Justice Department. The autopsy says that to cause the wound pattern that he had, Baxter held the gun five feet from his head. Baxter had a asphalt brush on his arm as if he had fallen on the pavement. He was murdered in Tom DeLay's hometown. Baxter was the ONLY Enron exec to have remorse.
exenrontexas 2 years ago
@ars21689 You need to be listening to be able to hear Olbermanns MANY criticism of the failure of Obama to reverse the fascist policies of BUSH and to arrest and try the BUSHIES for TREASON.
exenrontexas 2 years ago
lool funny vid:)
dantebezze 2 years ago 2
Olbermann can't even debate his hero because he was not reading from the teleprompter supplied from the White House. Just a mumbling, stumbling mashed up bag of human fat.
Priceless!!!
brad90956 2 years ago 2
it seems as if even Howard Dead doesn't watch Olbermann.. lol!
tflst5 2 years ago 5
The sky is blue, sun rises in the east, death, taxes and Keith Olbermann is batshit crazy.
Purple Fury on October 14, 2009 at 8:17 AM
TheSaturnV 2 years ago 6
".......you maybe crazy or you maybe wrong but at least put some meat on the Bone "
LOL
LOL
LOL
There are SO many jokes in there !!
Olberman is the Biggest Joke of ALL !!!
Damn, I swear that guy is getting Fatter by the day !
53dumey 2 years ago 4
Man I can't wait to see Jon Stewart do a piece on all of Olbermann's BS. Oh yeah I forgot, Stewart only does that to conservatives.
jbm0745 2 years ago 7
They did call Br. Bush names & you said nothing, Howard.
solly7 2 years ago 7
And Obama is Creating ................. ????
Crazy Liberals forget how they called Bush every name in the Book !
BathTub Boy does'nt have a case, he just wants to Whine !!!!!!
53dumey 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"If you're going to call someone a fascist, lay out your case." Funny how Olbermann's case was conveniently cut out of this video. Bush was creating a corporate state, which is the definition of fascism.
saiochi 2 years ago
Blah blah blah....
His case wasn't cut out--watch the video again.
Don't defend Olbermann. He is clearly, clearly a hypocrite!
maverick1819 2 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
His defense was left out of this video, I've seen the original. This video makes it appear that Olbermann is just a rabid hater of Bush, with no justification. And he wasn't in that video.
saiochi 2 years ago
Give me a fucking break. Makes it look like Olbermann is just a rabid hater of Bush? Well that is what he is, douchebag. He has claimed Bush is worse than the terrorists. There is no fucking defense for it. Hell, he has even claimed that Fox News has done more damage than the Taliban. No amount of video in the fucking world can explain that away asshole, regardless of how many of Keith's ten viewers claim it can.
masanf 2 years ago 5
@masanf
You are a complete fucking moron. So according to you, Bush was a fascist because he was making the US a corporate state, but the guy who initiated a government takeover of multiple banks, GM and Chrysler is not a fascist? Nice to see intellectual consistency isn't your strong suit. Of course, I knew that the second you said you were a libertarian voting for Obama. Because, obviously, a libertarian would support the most statist presidential candidate since FDR, and maybe ever.
masanf 9 months ago
ah yes the corporate state, well at least you realize that that is a key element of fascism which so few on the left, right, and center realize but alas it has been obama who has done even larger gov't intrusions into private banks and most fascist like of all is the gov't taking partial ownership of GM. if by bush's fascism you mean accepting corp donations and being friendly to donors that is age old and even obambi does that just look at his donor records.
umrmecheman 2 years ago
We intruded in those companies because we bailed them out, and basically owned them. Take for example AIG, we own the majority of it, therefor we can make the rules. This is commonplace in a capitalist system that the majority holders of a company make the rules.
saiochi 2 years ago
it is commonplace in capitalism for PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS to own parts of corps and make "the rules" which of course would have to comply with gov't rules like sec regs but the gov't should never own part of private companies. if you've noticed the AIG corps are making profits again and still paying large bonuses to their CEOs and pple are mad about it but we should be surprised since banks give heavily to many candidates such as barney frank and chris dodd. lets break that unholy bond.
umrmecheman 2 years ago 2
you do make a good point that we took a majority stake in the company but i will say that we should never have done that in the first place. gov'ts like soviet russia that owned/operated almost all industries produced sh** products like the car yugo and despite the USSR having way more natural resources than a place like Japan, they simply couldn't produce near the output for the same amount of input. The inherent problem is that gov't is insulated from market forces bc it need not make profits
umrmecheman 2 years ago 2
I agree, we shouldn't have bailed them out in the first place. I'm not here to defend Obama, I am a libertarian. While I did vote for Obama, it was because I couldn't vote for Ron Paul because he wasn't on the ticket. There are systems in place for dealing with insolvent banks, which we did not use.
saiochi 2 years ago
You are a libertarian? You couldn't vote for Ron Paul so you voted for Obama? You are a libertarian? Because when I can't vote for Paul, I am obviously going to vote for the most far-left, statist candidate in United States history. Here is a tip saiochi, no one fucking believes you are a libertarian.
masanf 2 years ago 2
Yes, because being a libertarian means if your candidate doesn't get the republican nomination, that you should just vote for the one who does. Right? Oh wait, that's not how it works. I voted for Obama because I am a LEFT-LEANING libertarian. Yes, we exist. Now shut the fuck up, please.
saiochi 2 years ago
@saiochi
Hey dipshit, you are either a libertarian or you support a candidate who calls for a vast expansion of the power of the state. What are you going to do next, claim you are a capitalist who believes in a centralized economy?
masanf 9 months ago
This tool needs to be on medication.
brad90956 2 years ago
Olberman see's things in the Today since !
Do Not Call Obama a Facist !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Although he called Bush a Facist, Tyrant, EVIL, Traitor etc... Risign NOW !!
He spent most of time during the Clinton trials in the Bath-Tub smoking weed and crack !!
Hence the name Bathtub Boy !!!
He thinks O'Reilly should be Fired ! LOL
53dumey 2 years ago 2
Olberman is quite literally insane.
mustangman37360 2 years ago 5
You are a fascist for saying that!
;)
blogegog 2 years ago 2
So even though Olbermann is too scared to debate a conservative on his show, he still managed to lose a a debate with hard-left Howard Dean!
grmaster10 2 years ago 5
These two fucking clowns on name-calling? This is a joke right? These are actors right? They've been calling people names for years in Michigan, in Montana, in Iowa, in Delaware, in Nevada, in Kansas, and Washington DC, weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee-oooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhh !!!!!!!!
demslibssuck 2 years ago 2
Olberdork is always good for a laugh from the hypocritical left wing. Good stuff though. Nice work Olbywatch.
doctorcane 2 years ago 3
This mindless robot reads and reports garbage from left wing blogs as fact from a teleprompter. Bring in a "live" person with an opposing point of view, cut the teleprompter and see how Olbermann handles it. Oh wait, you just saw what happened...he is totally out of his element and could not defend any of his statements. I bet he went home and sat in the bath tub for days weeping about what a HACK he really is.
brad90956 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
cut the teleprompter thing.. everyone reads from teleprompters nowadays.. doesn't make them less intelligent if they're reading from one
cimed8085 2 years ago
Olbermann got owned. One of his buddies makes an excellent point and Olby can't defend his actions...just stumbles over his words. That's why he doesn't debate anyone...because you can't debate while reading from a teleprompter. What a joke!!!!
brad90956 2 years ago 5
Olbermann is a joke!! He needs to be taken off T.V.
hughess3 2 years ago 4
Great Video!!!! You are spot on!!
reddoogan 2 years ago 2
Dean was correct. We should remember that we are all Americans first. You can disagree without being disagreeable. Keith has not figured that out yet. The CEO of GE, Jerry Zucker, must like him. Obama and Zucker have close ties in the new cap and trade business model.
bertly71 2 years ago
Was Dean commenting on Olby's statements, or was it just a coincidence? In other words, was Dean trying to destroy Olby or did it just remind OlbyWatch of things that Olby had said in the past ("fascism" etc...)?
hockeyfan3394 2 years ago
Rolling on the ground laughing!!!
conservativeco 2 years ago 2
Awesome!
ObamAtheist 2 years ago 2
Olberwoman is a pervert.
And he is shaped like a pear.
mmhmaster 2 years ago 4
Olbermann is such a faggy puke.
LizzyxDarcy 2 years ago 3
I cant believe I would ever say this but...thanks Howard Dean
THE74MALDITO 2 years ago 16
Great video...Dean just fucked Olbermann up and he couldn't defend himself. That's why he doesn't EVER debate anyone. LOL
brad90956 2 years ago 17
@brad90956 HGWT5763. 02/10/25/2010 A.D. HOWARD DEAN DID NO SUCH THING-K.O. JUST CALLED THEM AS HE SAW THEM-GEORGE WALKER BUSH,WARMONGER,THE THIEF THAT STOLE THE WHITE HOUSE-APPARENTLY WHAT WEJUST SAW WAS SPLICED AND EDITED SIDEWAYS,SORT OF,WAY TO GO,K.O.!
HORSE1492 1 year ago
Haha I love this.
fallstoofar 2 years ago 3
Keith Obamann?
NiemandBinich 2 years ago 3
Keith Ooberfail or Keith Boogeymann?
conservativeco 2 years ago 2
he should get his head out of obamas ass,but maybe he also gets tingles up and down his leg like that other ass.
2skibutch 2 years ago 3
I see Dean's meds seem to work very well, maybe they should give some to Olby.
bittergunowner12 2 years ago 7
great video!! send olberman to Afghanistan .. then lets see how really brave is the punk ass
noliberalzone 2 years ago 5
VERY GOOD POINT!
gokufievel 2 years ago
I didn't even know Olberman was still on TV. How can a show go on with no ratings?
lebmasv 2 years ago 5
Who's Olberman?
KarlUshanka 2 years ago 3
Exactly, nobody watches him.
bittergunowner12 2 years ago
"huge deficits that he [Bush] ran up"........So if Obama has spent more in 2 months than Bush did in 8 years, what would that be??!
danimal9579 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
But.. he hasn't spend more in 2 months than Bush did in 8 years... not really defending the spending, but it's really not even clsoe.
lcswoosh 2 years ago
Are you serious?! Under President Obamas proposed budget, our deficit will hit $1.8 trillion this year — quadrupling the 2008 record shortfall and amounting to 13.1 percent of the countrys entire economic output. The CBO has projected $9.3 trillion in deficits over the next 10 yrs. That is $2.3 trillion worse than the Obama administrations early predictions, $1 trillion per year until 2019, 4 times as much as President Bushs deficits.
danimal9579 2 years ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
o Israel has killed Americans (eg. Sailors on USS Liberty, Rachel Corrie, etc...)
o Israel spies on this country.
o Israel blackmails our corrupt politicians.
o Israel steals our taxes.
o Israel uses our country as their toilet.
For more info, click my UsedID then browse my informative Israel playlist.
Please distribute this post and tell your Senator and/or Representative about Israel's killing Americans, heinous crimes, stealing our taxes, and its spying on USA. Peace!
HateAllNazis 2 years ago
What does he mean, "If somebody had called President Bush dreadful names like that, I would have said 'Look, we disagree with President Bush - strongly - and he's wrong about the war in Iraq, for example, or the huge deficits that he ran up, but he is the President and we are going to be respectful of him." He's one to be talking about "huge deficits" - Obama has surpassed everyone, and President Bush was called every name in the book - and some new ones. Besides, Obama is a fascist.
MiaZgra 2 years ago
This is like watching two squirls fuking! Funny!
LiberalshateAmerica 2 years ago 3
Olbermann is one of the biggest douche bags on tv.
ronpaul101789 2 years ago 23
OK, let me see if I can explain.....this was about Olby being made to look like a fool by Howard Dean. I pointed out that Dean had shown class and mentioned that this was a trait obviously foreign to Olby. I didn't mention opinion or say the shows shouldn't have opinion etc.....please read the lead up to what another person and I were discussing and you will see that you are way out of line. It only takes a few minutes...start from the beginning OK?
Sanbar4 2 years ago 4
To believe there is a significant difference between the antics, legal and otherwise, of the two parties is to simply label yourself as suffering from selective memory. From the beginning of the two party system, the actions of those in power have served, at times, to amuse and at other times sicken. Two sides of the same coin is a great way to sum it up.
Sanbar4 2 years ago 4
Either find Democratic legal transgressions that compare to those I listed for the Republicans, or go back to watching South Park.
Republicans and Democrats are not the same parties they were in the 1800s so any discussion that inclued "from the beginning of the two party system" is a different (though valid and interesting) discussion. Let's talk since 1964, an appropriate watershed year for both parties.
jos0531 2 years ago
What is "SouthPark"? Haven't had the pleasure. Anyway........all that you list are simply opinion. Oh there have been many that maintained just what you say but again, more opinion. When someone of legitimate stature (and I don't mean some liberal, left wing writer or talking head) proves your statements then you will have my apology. Lets use the Supreme Court as a standard huh? This posting was about KO and more importantly, the words of the former head of the DNC. Not Bush.
Sanbar4 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This would be funny and appropriate if Republicans and Democrats were two sides of the same coin. They're not. Republicans really did pursue unitary power for the (Republican) executive, they really did trample Constitutional rights, and they really did rig elections. Democrats have done none of these things. Thus Keith is correct to apply the "fascist" label to Republicans, and those who address Democrats with that perjorative really ought to rethink their positions.
jos0531 2 years ago
acorn
JockamoGoon 2 years ago 6
LOL. This whole video is gold
Repoman23 2 years ago 7
You have to give Dean his due in this one. He showed "Class" in this instance if not always. "...he is the President and we're going to be respectful of him"
Good Idea and a concept that Olby can't seem to understand.
Sanbar4 2 years ago 2
man he seems to be obsessed with glen beck and bill oreilly. why doesnt he stop advertising people like oreilly and hannity and start having people in his program who can bring the other point of view. atleast chris mathews tries to bring the people who disagrees with him
maharajakal 2 years ago 2
"Is there a little bit of a double standard here or am I being overly sensitive" Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Olbermann you're a dork! Ha ha ha
prrolg 2 years ago 2
so now that democrats are in office , they cant call the republicans or Bush any more names, but also they forbid any at Obama.. ha! boy are they syupid.. i call olberman a fucking douchebag on zanex
custardpie40 2 years ago 2
"In May of 1939, with FDR's socialist New Deal then six years old, Morganthau
testified before the House Ways and Means Committee just how absolute a
disaster Roosevelt's socialist big spending, taxing and heavy regulating
policies were . Speaking for Roosevelt's government Morganthau confessed:
"We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent
before and it does not work. And I have just one interest, and if I am wrong"
decypher3 2 years ago 2
somebody else can have my job. I want to see this country prosperous. I want
to see people get a job. I want to see people get enough to eat. We have
never made good on our promises ...I say after eight years of this
Administration we have just as much employment as when we started ...and an
enormous debt to boot".
decypher3 2 years ago 2
After all this chattering bullshit and pathetic talking points (lol Clinton rode the Reagan boom while we had a recession in 91-92... riiiiight, LBJ rode JFK tax cuts that weren't even implemented under JFK presidency? WTF!).
You idiots can't explain the fact that FDR had 8% average growth, JFK-LBJ 5.5% and Clinton 3.6%? The only post war Democrat to do worse than Reagan's 3.4% was Carter (at 3.3% hardly worse) and Truman's elected term (he did have massive growth in his first 'term' though).
jpbalkenende 2 years ago
Reagans tax cuts gave rise to the R&D that led to the tech boom that fueled the economy in the 90s' Clinton had nothing to do with it except for slowing it down with tax increases in 1993 and then speeding it up with tax cuts (a conservative approach) in 1997 with the help of the GOP Congress.
"LBJ rode JFK tax cuts that weren't even implemented under JFK presidency? WTF!)."
They were passed in 1962 and went into full effect in 1964, right as LBJ's presidency was beginning. LBJ rode the wave.
decypher3 2 years ago
"They were passed in 1962 and went into full effect in 1964, right as LBJ's presidency was beginning. LBJ rode the wave."
Then HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THE JFK GROWTH? God damn it use your damn brain!
jpbalkenende 2 years ago
The post 1958 recession boom. GDP growth for 1959-60 was actually higher than 1961-62. GDP growth was slowing until JFK cut taxes.
decypher3 2 years ago
You said it yourself it's a post recession bounce. JFk had 5.5% growth which again is twice what Reagan had.
And for the last time WHAT IS IT ABOUT WW2 THAT PRODUCED AN ECONOMIC BOOM? It's almost uncanny how systematically you two dolts have avoided that question.
jpbalkenende 2 years ago
"You said it yourself it's a post recession bounce."
That started WELL BEFORE JFK's term started. He had nothing to do with a bounce that happened two years before he took office. And not to nitpick but JFK averaged 5.1% growth.
"And for the last time WHAT IS IT ABOUT WW2 THAT PRODUCED AN ECONOMIC BOOM?"
Are you kidding me? Wars are economic boons. Seriously, are you so stupid that you have to ask this question?
"
decypher3 2 years ago 3
"WHAT IS IT ABOUT WW2 THAT PRODUCED AN ECONOMIC BOOM? "
You can't be serious?
Do you understand pre WW2 our military was no where near prepared for any kind of war? Gee.......that means you have to PRODUCE !
Andddddd factories need people to produce.....and they get things called "JOBS" !
Those things called "jobs" pay useful barter units called "money" for people. Those people then spend the "money"...growing an economy !
hoganfader 2 years ago 4
And who PAYS for those jobs? Oh yes THE GOVERNMENT! You idiot. Bullets are not magic in fact FDR could have created a wartime economy without a war. It would haver had the same economic effect (an economic boom and giant deficits). It is in principle an admission by you that conservatism has failed. Thank you.
Of course without a war it makes more sense to create things that have some utility and economic value. Like roads and infrastructure. Note: this only works in a depressed economy.
jpbalkenende 2 years ago
Sorry, skippy....You walked right into the admission. What we have said all along. WW2 was the recovery. Not his failed policies for the previous years. You Lose. As always.
hoganfader 2 years ago 3
"None of this changes the facts that FDR's new deal produced stronger growth than any president since. "
That's just it, his New Deal didn't produce any economic growth. 6 years later and unemployment was still in the stratosphere and the economy was in another recession. The New Deal leveraged us to the hilt.
Public debt in 1933: 22.5 Billion
Public debt in 1941: 48.9 Billion
Even FDR's own Treasury Secretay admitted that the New Deal was a huge boondoggle.
decypher3 2 years ago
In May of 1939, with FDR's socialist New Deal then six years old, Morganthau
testified before the House Ways and Means Committee just how absolute a
disaster Roosevelt's socialist big spending, taxing and heavy regulating
policies were . Speaking for Roosevelt's government Morganthau confessed:
"We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent
before and it does not work. And I have just one interest, and if I am wrong....
decypher3 2 years ago 2
continued:
"somebody else can have my job. I want to see this country prosperous. I want
to see people get a job. I want to see people get enough to eat. We have
never made good on our promises ...I say after eight years of this
Administration we have just as much employment as when we started ...and an
enormous debt to boot". (p.2 "New Deal or Raw Deal"?)"
decypher3 2 years ago
"That's just it, his New Deal didn't produce any economic growth. 6 years later and unemployment was still in the stratosphere and the economy was in another recession. The New Deal leveraged us to the hilt."
5.5% GDP growth pear year you idiot. You can yap your trap all you want nothing changes that. FDR makes Reagan look like the b-list actor he was. And so did Kennedy, LBJ and Clinton.
jpbalkenende 2 years ago
"5.5% GDP growth pear year you idiot. "
That had nothing to do with the New Deal, even FDR's own Treasury Secretary admitted that. What do you know that he doesn't?
decypher3 2 years ago
"Still what do you have to say for the fact that FDR had 8% average growth, JFK-LBJ 5.5% and Clinton 3.6%?"
FDR averaged 8% because of WWII, JFK had 5.5% because of his tax cuts. LBJ just road off of that tidal wave. Reagan's 3.5% growth was miraculous considering the mess Carter left him. Remember Carter? His admin. gave us the term "Misery Index".
Clinton rode off of the tech boom created by Reagan's tax cuts. Crediting Clinton for the economy is like crediting a rooster for the sunrise.
decypher3 2 years ago
"JFK had 5.5% because of his tax cuts"
Wrong the tax cuts came after JFK, LBJ invoked his name to pass them though.
"Reagan's 3.5% growth was miraculous considering the mess Carter left him. Remember Carter? His admin. gave us the term "Misery Index"."
lol Carter growth was 3.3% soundly beating Nixon/Ford and both Bushes.
Come on admit it you are making some pathetic excuses here. Your arguments have zero intellectual grounding and are 100% ideological.
jpbalkenende 2 years ago
"Wrong the tax cuts came after JFK"
Wrong, idiot. The cuts came in 1962. Nice try but you fail again. LBJ rode the wave JFK created.
"Carter growth was 3.3%"
13% unemployment, 21% inflation, stagflation, gas lines, hostages. Carter's presidency was a mess and Reagan cleaned it up.
"Come on admit it you are making some pathetic excuses here."
Translation: Don't bother me with facts!
decypher3 2 years ago
"Translation: Don't bother me with facts!"
Here you go:
FDR had 8% average growth, JFK-LBJ 5.5% and Clinton 3.6%? The only post war Democrat to do worse than Reagan's 3.4% was Carter (at 3.3% hardly worse) and Truman's elected term (he did have massive growth in his first 'term' though).
jpbalkenende 2 years ago
"FDR had 8% average growth"
WWII
"JFK-LBJ 5.5%"
JFK's tax cuts, the Vietnam War and the post 1958 recession boom. Check GDP growth for 1959 and 1960. It's actually higher than 1961 and 1962.
" Clinton 3.6%? "
We already went over this. Repeating the same bullshit stat without examining the reasons behind it does you no good.
Reagan's 3.4% was amazing considering the mess that was handed to him by Carter. It was only 3.4% in REAL dollars is because inflation was so high (thanks to Carter).
decypher3 2 years ago
"Reagan's 3.4% was amazing considering the mess that was handed to him by Carter. It was only 3.4% in REAL dollars is because inflation was so high (thanks to Carter)."
That Carter figure of 3.3% growth was also inflation adjusted.
jpbalkenende 2 years ago
"That Carter figure of 3.3% growth was also inflation adjusted."
So what? Inflation didn't hit until into Carter's term,
decypher3 2 years ago 2
Reagan economic program took effect in 1982, the economy took off , growing at an average annual rate of 4.3%. As a comparison, average annual growth for the twelve years from 1990-2001 (since Reagan) was 2.95%, for 1991-2001 (previous trough to peak) it was 3.05% and for 1992-2001 (the last expansion) it was 3.4%.
The average growth for the eight Clinton years was 3.55%, and it was part of the last expansion period.
hoganfader 2 years ago 2
Not to mention the economy went south when LBJ was President.
bittergunowner12 2 years ago
Olberman is a JOKE! look at the ratings! Just released! FOX RULES!
Fox remains on a mountain above its two closest competitors, with its prime-time audience in March more than that of MSNBC and CNN combined. "The O'Reilly Factor" has done particularly well, keeping more of its postelection audience than anything else on CNN and MSNBC.
Through Wednesday, Fox was averaging 2.73 million prime-time viewers in March. MSNBC had 1.16 million and CNN had 1.14 million.
republicansrule 2 years ago 2
olberdouche! lol! what an idiot. our cable network in NY has a blackout at 8PM on MSNBC every Mon-Fri so I can't see this on tv---and i'm not complaining.
teltelamont 2 years ago 3
Bathtub Boy Olbermann asks if there's a double standard???? LMAO
The Mad Hatter (umm.. Hater) strikes again.
IslandSpiceDreamin 2 years ago 4
And back to topic. Olbermann is bonkers lol
hoganfader 2 years ago 4
Olbermann is the voice of yellow journalism in our day.
TexasMirth 2 years ago 5
Good point. Olbermann's entire show is misinformation, deception, & misleading his audience. He seems unstable psychologically and is filled with hate with anyone that disagrees with him. He is a radical and is totally incapable of any thoughtful dialogue. One has to wonder why MSNBC and NBC keeps this guy on the air with his extremely low ratings? But more importantly- Olbermann is dangerous. There are naive , young, impressionable people out there that actually listen & believe his rantings.
mythexposer 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what a pathetic editing job... that is all this robert cox moron does in his videos when he obsesses over olbermann.
if anything, i think this proves the point of olbermann's guests disagreeing with him. the last part of the segment where they were talking about calling bush a fascist, it was obvious dean didnt agree with him, and he laid it out simply without attacking keith. im sure he knows keith said that about bush, but its an opinion, so there would be no reason to attack him on it.
GstateBALLER925 2 years ago
Editing job ? Sorry--save that for MediaMatters. And Center for American progress. (A group who saw fit last week to harass a rape victim just because Bill O supported her- after Bill's words were taken out of context)
Guess Keith didn't say those things ? Whom was he calling a fascist? Seems like you admitted it in your last paragraph.
The former HEAD of the DNC disagrees with him on "fascist" -and you lump that into ALL guests disagreeing with him.
Well that's 1........in 8 years Congrats.
hoganfader 2 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yeah thats right... robert cox linked the beg of the interview with the end when keith brought up calling a pres. fascist. media matters has never pulled the shit cox does in his fucking videos... they show full video context. can you prove otherwise? please... are you a fucking moron? took oreilly out of context? lmao... what because terkel didnt mention the mel gibson part? that doesnt even do anything to prove the point. and how did they harass the rape victim? they didnt even bring up alexa.
GstateBALLER925 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i never said keith didnt call bush a fascist... its obvious he did, and im sure dean knows he did. so wtf are you talking about? there is nothing to admit.
no, i dont lump that into all of his guests disagreeing with him... that is one of many, many times that guests have disagreed with him. just because they arent yelling back at him, doesnt mean there is no disagreement.
basically, you are an idiot who believes the bullshit that oreilly tells you complaining he got smeared. lol so typical.
GstateBALLER925 2 years ago
Ha....Olberman busted. What a fuck bag.
pubstar2432 2 years ago 4
Great video. So true.
1300miles 2 years ago 3
luls
gsurlak 2 years ago
As a partisan R, I wonder why the Ds abandoned Howard Dean. He's a sharp dude. Has been very effective in his role as chair of the DNC.
The "Dean Scream" was much ado about nothing. What was his sin? Too much enthusiasm? That's a good thing.
Yeah, I never would've praised him when he was the leading Democrat candidate for Prez in '04. Guilty.
Don't like either of these guys. Olby's a harmless blowhard. Dean's smart to disown the lame "fascist" label. Olby would be wise to follow suit.
HuellsJewels 2 years ago
hilarious. no matter what Keith did to try to lead Dean into giving an agreeable answer nothing worked. he must've been so pissed after this.
pulsar00815 2 years ago 4
Good call pulsar,
That's Olby's favorite technique, leading the witness. His ego can't handle being challenged, so he tries to lead his guests to safe turf.
But Dean didn't follow Keith's lead, and that's what made this interview so great. For once, we got some candor, and Keith was shown as the tool he is.
klrdotorg 2 years ago 5
Keith, run into your office.........hide under your desk........... and stay there!
We'll let you know when it's safe to come out.
klrdotorg 2 years ago 2