Added: 4 years ago
From: mehmetogluenergy
Views: 375,198
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (163)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • what a waste

  • sieht Sceiße aus!

  • Comment removed

  • I want to buy a million of these generators!! I will be rich!! RICH!!!!!!!

  • how can that thing spin??? -_-

  • Is there a fluid visualization graphic for this design?

  • w w w diymagneticmotor com for FREE energy, anyone has tried it?

  • Dutch Windmill. The poster is Turkish.

  • I have to agree with smbor2 here. the rollers would completly destroy the way wind moves across the blades. with the larger turbans such as Vestas V100 and GE Gen10 the blades need to rotate in order to match the outside wind speed. the blade design here would not work at all for serious power generating wind turbans.

  • I like this idea in theory. However you would be relying on viscous flow over the cylinders to rotate them and contribute to the magnus effect. The magnus effect will not be optimised the way a propeller is due to your design not accounting for vaiable pitch. Furthermore you completely destroy the profile of the aerofoil on the propeller with the inclusing of the cylinders. The magnus effect is inferior for thrust and hence why engines use blades rather than rotating cylinders!

  • Before you get to carried away, read about how many wind power generators are already built, and how little they operate, and how little power they actually contribute. 

  • CHROME IS THE WAY TO GO! :D

  • Its so easy to make things work in a CGI program.

    Just like the flying cars in the star wars movies.

  • @MrHobiecat Then see the other video's off the poster.

  • @m1aws couldnt he get all the bullKwrap in one video?!

  • @m1aws there are NO real prototypes of this POS in any of the poster's other videos.

  • @MrHobiecat

    /watch?v=RC8Qe--wB1c

    /watch?v=xC9DYd_LVaQ

    I guess these are CGI too.

  • @m1aws again, those are NOT the configuration shown in this video, and apparently they are being spun by hand or by a motor, because a cylinder blade is NOT self starting.

  • @MrHobiecat There are no sizable "self starting" turbines, anywhere.

    You complained they did not exist outside cgi.

    The power would be leeched from the main rotor. And??? Everything is in within an infrastructure.

    These are simulations to assess real world efficiency.

  • @m1aws ALL the three blade wind generators used all over the world are self starting.

    what is your part of the action in this scam video? these people are all the same, they are not trying to SELL windmills, they are looking for suckers to 'invest' in their great new idea

    and by 'invest' I mean you give them your money and you never see it again.

    The dynamics of wind generators has been well understood for HUNDREDS OF YEARS. The POS simulated in this video is BS!

  • @MrHobiecat

    Scam? This was is Dutch University experiment.

    Now you are beginning to sound like an idiot. Stop it!

    Yes, they are all self starting after application of electricity. Try knocking down the control tower of a wind turbine farm and they cease to function. Shut down. Simple as.

    Oh, here's an irony for you. Installation of turbines like state funded bomb making factories, errr, nuke plants. ARE expensive! But in this case the fuel is free. Don't you want your crippling debts paid for?

  • @m1aws Oh geeze, My BAD!

    I didnt realize Holland and TURKEY are the same country!

  • me and my friends went under a windmill last night, they are f***ing big!!! you know how big these blades would have to be

  • So it's a self-starting with self turning Flettner rotor in each blade?

  • the cylinder turn without energy band produce no energy, that is very important scientific advance. Are we yet ready for this out of this world technologie? 

  • i'd like a bird to go in there..

  • thats pretty damn cool

  • this would not work!!! the spinning mechanisims on each blade would act as a gyro and wouldent like to spin

  • Comment removed

  • @brownbrve Maybe that's why there hasn't been an update since 2007!

  • @brownbrve

    Bro, you're right it wouldn't work...Now if you filled up those spinning watchajiblets with gerbils then it would have no other choice but to work.

  • too loud :)

  • does it produce more energy than a regular turbine, is it worth the extra cost, too many moving parts, seems heavy, not safe for birds,

  • I would think they'd still have the same problems as other turbines with the blade design (Ice throw, flicker, blades breaking due to high wind stress, etc)

  • that must be what chuck norris shaves with

  • OHHHHHHH

  • When shit hits the- ummm how do you even describe this thing?!?!

  • siiiiick

  • WRONG

  • I would be surprised if this even turned. The centrifugal forces generated by the spinning 'cones' would cause havoc for the 'blades'.

  • It would be funny if one of those broke...

  • I can't find enough words to describe how stupid it is... Moving parts inside blades... A mouse with a brick in the a*s will generate more wind energy than this turbine...

  • what would happen if someone put a lazer on the windmill tho.

  • Brilliant concept..It is encouraging to see innovations related to wind energy and other alternate sources of energy.  Increasing demand for energy has opened up markets for the renewable energy sector. Solar, wind, geothermal, and hydropower are the alternate energy sources that the world is recognizing, in order to cut down greenhouse gas emissions. Transformer Company, Pacific Crest Transformers has many articles and whitepapers on this emerging area.

  • thumbs up if u thought this looked badass from the picture but when u got here it was gay looking...

  • "Everyone who is related in this field is invited to share your thoughts and ideas with us."

    Im thinking about joining this field just so that i can let you know i think your a homosexual....

  • Annyoning thing ;l

  • thumbs down. You need to study aerodynamics.

  • I have a feeling this one's contrasting rotations will act like dampers on bridge contructions and bring the whole thing to a stop or at least kill its presumed efficiency. That's just from a first look. Maybe a prototype has already been made that disproves my belief.

  • why are does it need to be spinning 2 ways?

  • @MadHatterTruth why are does u not know how to spell ya retard?

  • Magnus effect

  • wonderful; circles within a circle...

  • alot of moving parts= alot of repairs

  • watch out for the VIBRATIONS

  • CG, next time use a refraction and reflexion map on your turbineblades, put a noise modifier on the tree's(as you did on the clouds)!!

    and dim the radiosity on the blades.... _0_

  • I have built a non wind turbine belt conveyor turbine cog driver it may sound a bit complicated but it's very similar to having a dog and still barking yourself abit pointless but don't be deterred alot of people spend hours and hours a day building absolute worthless rubbish and you never know by some miracle something might look good or even work, but please don't get too optimistic it might lead to much dissapointment :)

  • Must be SUPER windy there to get that huge thing to turn so fast o.o

  • Don't write off this idea. It has more moving parts, but these parts move slowly compared to a turbine blade and take up less space. Making turbines safer so they can be put in more places is important.

  • too much complex structure and can't be energy efficient imho

  • It looks like there is such a disconnect between the actual wind energy and the horizontal axis. There's no direct force.. correct? If so, you could maybe hold this turbine shaft down with an index finger. It's definitely a work of art in design and thought, but mecanically it loses all its torque I think? Unless maybe I don't understand it. The cylinders, are they geared to the horizontal shaft? It's allot of moving parts, more parts equal more failure, friction, maintenance. Cool Look.

  • Seems like more moving parts than conventional turbines, may be harder to maintain and service.

  • Once perpetual motion has a way to be made possible, the energy crisis will be solved. That would probably need some chamber with absolutely no gravity... SOMEONE GET WORKING

  • mezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzmerizing....­..........

  • Gillette... the best a man can have!!!

  • "can get".....Gillette, the best a man can get

  • @jheredi84 hehehehe

  • @jheredi84 LOL what!?

  • i prefer, the normal one, they loo

    k less ugly

  • Comment removed

  • Looks like a francy Shaver...YOU TAKE ONE STROKE..IT TAKES THREE!

  • its neat but creepy at the same time lol and its waay to bulky.. get it to slice through the air without making a sword out of the blasted thing...

  • Kids would find that scary

  • Nuclear power costs have been artificially inflated due to politics in most countries. The actual cost to the end user, including a comfortable profit for the power company, comes to less than $0.02 per kilowatt-hour, and there's NOTHING on Earth that can compete with that, either now or in the foreseeable future. You're the ignorant one, baur02: Wind power has been used for thousands of years, but has been largely abandoned since more reliable sources were developed in the Industrial Age.

  • Actually large scale hydro has been the cheapest source of electricity for last 100 years. A hydro plant repays its investment cost within 10 years and then gives nearly free power for another 90 at least. Plus it is dispatchable. The main drawback is the very limited number of acceptable sites for large hydro dams. China had to move 1.2 million people out of the way to make room for Three Gorges. They can do that in China. No way in the US.

  • It's even worse than you say. In California, land of Luddite loonies, they're dismantling hydro projects and preventing construction of new ones or even upgrades of existing ones to protect some species of non-native fish, frog or whatever. The push is for wind and solar, so our lights go out at night and when the wind stops blowing. Now the nuts complain that windmills are "too loud" and that they "kill birds". Madness.

  • It's like David MacKay says in his video and book: if people want the lights to go on, they cannot be against every single form of power generation.

    The Chinese don't seem to have a problem with wind-NIMBYs. They more than doubled their installed wind power capacity each year from 2005 through 2008 and will nearly double it again this year to over 20 GW.

  • No matter how fancy the wind turbine is, it stops generating when the wind stops blowing. I like my lights, my computer, my entertainment systems and my electric appliances to work even at night when there's no sun and no wind. Germany is seriously reconsidering their foray into wind power now due to cost and reliability problems. The only solution for the long term is nuclear power.

  • alright then you pay a premium for your electricity. the only thing holding wind power back is ignorant people who dont like change. every form of power came through these phases, even your precious nuclear. so relax, step back and appreciate that people are trying to make a difference for the now and futur.

  • It looks like a good idea, but I wouldn't be surprised if the math involved proved it to be less energy efficient than a regular turbine with straight blades.

  • Only retards fall for this shit

  • Well some of the best ideas came from the failures of others. So take it easy.

  • I suggest that you build one yourself. Building your own wind turbine is actually a lot easier than one could imagine. You can contact me if you have any questions.

  • Just 1 problem...

    Birds.

  • Careful! It seems you've been drinking just a little too much of that environmentalist Kool Aid!

  • Who is talking about enviroment?

    Birs + gears (or something rotating like a turbine) = problem ;)

    And no... the nuclear power it´s only amazing for my grandma.

    2 super sources of energy:

    Hydrogen and Heat...

    (yes, heat, and Im not planning to explain the concept)

    Ta Ta

  • attach those flashlight shake generators to the dominant arm of each teenage boy in America and you have your energy problems solved, with a lot leftover for turd world countries.

  • goyherder I like your thinking! A whole lot of wasted energy. Could set up a college fund for them if you gave them a % kickback on what is sold to the grid.

    2 problems solved!

  • HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

  • damn straight XD

  • @goyherder hahahahaha

  • @goyherder LMFAO, good one man!

  • @goyherder LOL Did you actually intend to type "turd world" ?

  • Yeah...heh. You come out with that giant razor and gilette is going to sue your ass...

  • Wow.... Now we have a windmill that puts out more energy.

  • i dnt under stand the spinging turbines within the blades. they lead no where and are just obstructions to the wind and break it before the wind hits the blades slowing it down

  • the turbines within the blades generate electricity too, they get whatever energy the wind produces

  • That thing looks cool can I get some gasoline powered ones for decorations at my ranch?

  • LOL

  • name of song?

  • lol

  • era un video en el que nos muestra como tres latas de aquarius pueden ser usadas utilmente

  • k koño era eso?

  • nice animation but if it was to be put into practice and have more use than a roast dinner at the local vegetarian convention. it would need much bigger blades. "too much going on in such a small area"

  • Getting as much energy efficiency as possible from renewable sources will mean that there's likely to be a lot going on in a small area. The aim of it being small is likely to mean that more of them can be installed on the same site. If it works, it's good!

  • if you don't understand why a wind turbine covering a small area is a bad thing w.r.t getting energy from the wind...... wow

  • As I understand, the large wind turbines have brakes that prevent them from spinning too fast. You've probably seen the videos of the failing on here. If large w.t.s need slowing down, maybe there's quite an energy gain using smaller turbines in the same area. If that's right, it's just an issue of cost isn't it?

  • it looks good, but there is no audio explantion of whats going on or words on the screen

  • Note the summary at the upper right of your screen, then look up "Magnus effect" in Wikipedia.

  • magnus effect also known as spindrift

  • How could the rotating cylinders be an advantage or improvement?

  • more energy

  • at least it caused me to wiki magnus effect...

  • All that's missing on this one are three coloured spheres extending vertically from the mast and bobbing up and down at varying heights. Whistles could also be attached to the blades for added absurdity.

  • looks cool, but i am sure this installation cost a lot of money. Hey we need cheap and affordable wind power!! that possibly can be used also in 3rd world countries

  • this is like when they came out with the battery powered mach 3 razor and tried to convince us that our regular ones were not giving a close enough shave? or is it a lot more efficient?

  • why Flettner rotors?

  • Many parts imply break-downs and high up-keep costs.

  • Many moving parts with high kinetic energy. Cool idea, though.

  • How does that work?

  • Magnus Effect is also known as "spindrift"

  • Looks cool, but I have no clue how it works!

  • check out my wind power vids...

  • It's like a gyroscope on steroids.

  • sorry...but that was my initial reaction.

    Could this really work?

  • they can't even keep the current ones from spontaneously exploding from high speed winds. D:

  • It's like a gyroscope on crack.

  • It does seem like a good idea, although, the surface area of the cylinders need to be increased to make it more efficient. So the useful wind energy is putting in, is effectively pushing it round, but the cylinders need a slightly bigger surface area to get more for for a greater distance.

    I'm not entirely sure though, you may have already done the maths to find that size is most efficient. It seems like a good idea seeing as how many catch on fire! the cylinders will slow it down slightly.

  • Mehmetoglu birader bizim Turkler youtube'un gereksiz videolarinda birbirlerine sovuyorlar su anda ama seni farkedememisler.insallah yabancilara kaptirmadan patentini alabilirsin. bir elektrik muhendisi olarak soyleyebilirim ki eger bahsettigin gibi %30 luk bir iyilestirme yapmissan ruzgar teknolojisini tamamen degistirebilirsin.

    Calismalarinda basarilar

  • Its huge nd would have a visual impact.

  • not to mention kill every bird in 100 square miles, endangered and all. These windmills are a blight; ugly, inefficient and raining hell on the avian population. Just wait to see what happens to the ecosystem when all the birds are dead at the base of these ridiculous windmills..

  • you re right ! we should take down all those windmills ... and since we re at it ... stop all oil production ! as you know it does kill sea animals too! stop driving renault, citroens, fords and those vw beetles ... they re ugly, inefficient and killing all kind of mammals crossing highways !!!

  • Fair comment. These are both environmental issues, so a balance has to be found. I think that generating more electricity in the same area as larger turbines would reduce the amount of wind farms required. Are simple ideas like caging around the turbine proven failures?

  • A beautiful machine in it's complexity, but hard to beat the old Aeromotors.

  • Looks like an add for Norelco Shavers, 100 blades to give you a close shave. The first blade fakes the whisker out, the second blade splits it at the atomic level, the third blade...

  • at least he's old enough to shave you cunt

  • What's the point?

  • Umm... It is not possible to have perpetual motion.

  • Its not perpetual motion. Its the Magnue Effect, causes by pressure differetial. It only lasts as long as there is wong. This is an energy generating machine, not a perpetual motion machine.

  • Meh... Gyroscopic action would stop it cold.

  • Too many moving parts. I'ld predict this concept will not find wide adaption in the industry since maintainability seems to be costly.

  • How much more efficient is this than a regular wind turbine?

  • It would be great to have some specs....weight...output...mov­ing parts...cost...comparisons etc..

  • This would seam to be on the same principal as a windmill. although I believe a windmill would be more effecient. Can we have some specs on this mill.

  • they proberbly fixed to a gear .thus when the whole thing turnes round one axis they spin i think.

  • Nope, its the Magnus effect. Someone read!

  • how the hell do the axes turn without any external power?

  • this is a new design that made me say "WOW" but whether it will produce energy or not, it's a different story

  • If It turns it will produce electric power.Spirals are very efficient our

    Milky Way galaxy is evidence of this

    genius.

  • so the milky way is a gind wind mill?

    uh boy thank you, i was thinking there was no air in space!

  • This will not produce any power

  • Man, you are dumb, this type of concept has already been made by the Germans decades ago and proven that it works.

  • to complicated...

  • Computer modeled?

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more