I have to agree with smbor2 here. the rollers would completly destroy the way wind moves across the blades. with the larger turbans such as Vestas V100 and GE Gen10 the blades need to rotate in order to match the outside wind speed. the blade design here would not work at all for serious power generating wind turbans.
I like this idea in theory. However you would be relying on viscous flow over the cylinders to rotate them and contribute to the magnus effect. The magnus effect will not be optimised the way a propeller is due to your design not accounting for vaiable pitch. Furthermore you completely destroy the profile of the aerofoil on the propeller with the inclusing of the cylinders. The magnus effect is inferior for thrust and hence why engines use blades rather than rotating cylinders!
Before you get to carried away, read about how many wind power generators are already built, and how little they operate, and how little power they actually contribute.
Great Video! Anyone wanting to purchase your own wind turbine DIY kit or parts for your Sovereign independence. Don't be a slave to the electric companies. 1500 Watt all inclusive turbine kit for about $1,500. Go Soveriegn! We have everything from charge controllers to Inverters. Buy one today! visit Sovereign's Depot @ sovdepot.com
@m1aws again, those are NOT the configuration shown in this video, and apparently they are being spun by hand or by a motor, because a cylinder blade is NOT self starting.
@m1aws ALL the three blade wind generators used all over the world are self starting.
what is your part of the action in this scam video? these people are all the same, they are not trying to SELL windmills, they are looking for suckers to 'invest' in their great new idea
and by 'invest' I mean you give them your money and you never see it again.
The dynamics of wind generators has been well understood for HUNDREDS OF YEARS. The POS simulated in this video is BS!
Now you are beginning to sound like an idiot. Stop it!
Yes, they are all self starting after application of electricity. Try knocking down the control tower of a wind turbine farm and they cease to function. Shut down. Simple as.
Oh, here's an irony for you. Installation of turbines like state funded bomb making factories, errr, nuke plants. ARE expensive! But in this case the fuel is free. Don't you want your crippling debts paid for?
the cylinder turn without energy band produce no energy, that is very important scientific advance. Are we yet ready for this out of this world technologie?
I would think they'd still have the same problems as other turbines with the blade design (Ice throw, flicker, blades breaking due to high wind stress, etc)
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But the Oil coporations life depends on covering this up,Get a motor that needs no gas or electric input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
I can't find enough words to describe how stupid it is... Moving parts inside blades... A mouse with a brick in the a*s will generate more wind energy than this turbine...
Brilliant concept..It is encouraging to see innovations related to wind energy and other alternate sources of energy. Increasing demand for energy has opened up markets for the renewable energy sector. Solar, wind, geothermal, and hydropower are the alternate energy sources that the world is recognizing, in order to cut down greenhouse gas emissions. Transformer Company, Pacific Crest Transformers has many articles and whitepapers on this emerging area.
I invented a breakthrough source of energy, which contradicts the law of conservation of energy. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena which contradict the law of energy conservation. It will cost about $1200 to make a 6 kW generator in mass production. Value of the energy produced yearly about $5400. I am looking for $300 000 for a prototype and for $3M for patents.
I have a feeling this one's contrasting rotations will act like dampers on bridge contructions and bring the whole thing to a stop or at least kill its presumed efficiency. That's just from a first look. Maybe a prototype has already been made that disproves my belief.
I have built a non wind turbine belt conveyor turbine cog driver it may sound a bit complicated but it's very similar to having a dog and still barking yourself abit pointless but don't be deterred alot of people spend hours and hours a day building absolute worthless rubbish and you never know by some miracle something might look good or even work, but please don't get too optimistic it might lead to much dissapointment :)
Don't write off this idea. It has more moving parts, but these parts move slowly compared to a turbine blade and take up less space. Making turbines safer so they can be put in more places is important.
It looks like there is such a disconnect between the actual wind energy and the horizontal axis. There's no direct force.. correct? If so, you could maybe hold this turbine shaft down with an index finger. It's definitely a work of art in design and thought, but mecanically it loses all its torque I think? Unless maybe I don't understand it. The cylinders, are they geared to the horizontal shaft? It's allot of moving parts, more parts equal more failure, friction, maintenance. Cool Look.
Once perpetual motion has a way to be made possible, the energy crisis will be solved. That would probably need some chamber with absolutely no gravity... SOMEONE GET WORKING
Hey, check out my website at ScientificallyGreener(Dot) com and get all the new and improved Equipments to build or buy your own solar and wind energy systems ScientificallyGreener(Dot) com is a website that sells the most modern environmental products available
Nuclear power costs have been artificially inflated due to politics in most countries. The actual cost to the end user, including a comfortable profit for the power company, comes to less than $0.02 per kilowatt-hour, and there's NOTHING on Earth that can compete with that, either now or in the foreseeable future. You're the ignorant one, baur02: Wind power has been used for thousands of years, but has been largely abandoned since more reliable sources were developed in the Industrial Age.
Actually large scale hydro has been the cheapest source of electricity for last 100 years. A hydro plant repays its investment cost within 10 years and then gives nearly free power for another 90 at least. Plus it is dispatchable. The main drawback is the very limited number of acceptable sites for large hydro dams. China had to move 1.2 million people out of the way to make room for Three Gorges. They can do that in China. No way in the US.
It's even worse than you say. In California, land of Luddite loonies, they're dismantling hydro projects and preventing construction of new ones or even upgrades of existing ones to protect some species of non-native fish, frog or whatever. The push is for wind and solar, so our lights go out at night and when the wind stops blowing. Now the nuts complain that windmills are "too loud" and that they "kill birds". Madness.
It's like David MacKay says in his video and book: if people want the lights to go on, they cannot be against every single form of power generation.
The Chinese don't seem to have a problem with wind-NIMBYs. They more than doubled their installed wind power capacity each year from 2005 through 2008 and will nearly double it again this year to over 20 GW.
No matter how fancy the wind turbine is, it stops generating when the wind stops blowing. I like my lights, my computer, my entertainment systems and my electric appliances to work even at night when there's no sun and no wind. Germany is seriously reconsidering their foray into wind power now due to cost and reliability problems. The only solution for the long term is nuclear power.
alright then you pay a premium for your electricity. the only thing holding wind power back is ignorant people who dont like change. every form of power came through these phases, even your precious nuclear. so relax, step back and appreciate that people are trying to make a difference for the now and futur.
It looks like a good idea, but I wouldn't be surprised if the math involved proved it to be less energy efficient than a regular turbine with straight blades.
I suggest that you build one yourself. Building your own wind turbine is actually a lot easier than one could imagine. You can contact me if you have any questions.
attach those flashlight shake generators to the dominant arm of each teenage boy in America and you have your energy problems solved, with a lot leftover for turd world countries.
goyherder I like your thinking! A whole lot of wasted energy. Could set up a college fund for them if you gave them a % kickback on what is sold to the grid.
i dnt under stand the spinging turbines within the blades. they lead no where and are just obstructions to the wind and break it before the wind hits the blades slowing it down
nice animation but if it was to be put into practice and have more use than a roast dinner at the local vegetarian convention. it would need much bigger blades. "too much going on in such a small area"
Getting as much energy efficiency as possible from renewable sources will mean that there's likely to be a lot going on in a small area. The aim of it being small is likely to mean that more of them can be installed on the same site. If it works, it's good!
As I understand, the large wind turbines have brakes that prevent them from spinning too fast. You've probably seen the videos of the failing on here. If large w.t.s need slowing down, maybe there's quite an energy gain using smaller turbines in the same area. If that's right, it's just an issue of cost isn't it?
All that's missing on this one are three coloured spheres extending vertically from the mast and bobbing up and down at varying heights. Whistles could also be attached to the blades for added absurdity.
looks cool, but i am sure this installation cost a lot of money. Hey we need cheap and affordable wind power!! that possibly can be used also in 3rd world countries
this is like when they came out with the battery powered mach 3 razor and tried to convince us that our regular ones were not giving a close enough shave? or is it a lot more efficient?
It does seem like a good idea, although, the surface area of the cylinders need to be increased to make it more efficient. So the useful wind energy is putting in, is effectively pushing it round, but the cylinders need a slightly bigger surface area to get more for for a greater distance.
I'm not entirely sure though, you may have already done the maths to find that size is most efficient. It seems like a good idea seeing as how many catch on fire! the cylinders will slow it down slightly.
Mehmetoglu birader bizim Turkler youtube'un gereksiz videolarinda birbirlerine sovuyorlar su anda ama seni farkedememisler.insallah yabancilara kaptirmadan patentini alabilirsin. bir elektrik muhendisi olarak soyleyebilirim ki eger bahsettigin gibi %30 luk bir iyilestirme yapmissan ruzgar teknolojisini tamamen degistirebilirsin.
not to mention kill every bird in 100 square miles, endangered and all. These windmills are a blight; ugly, inefficient and raining hell on the avian population. Just wait to see what happens to the ecosystem when all the birds are dead at the base of these ridiculous windmills..
you re right ! we should take down all those windmills ... and since we re at it ... stop all oil production ! as you know it does kill sea animals too! stop driving renault, citroens, fords and those vw beetles ... they re ugly, inefficient and killing all kind of mammals crossing highways !!!
Fair comment. These are both environmental issues, so a balance has to be found. I think that generating more electricity in the same area as larger turbines would reduce the amount of wind farms required. Are simple ideas like caging around the turbine proven failures?
Looks like an add for Norelco Shavers, 100 blades to give you a close shave. The first blade fakes the whisker out, the second blade splits it at the atomic level, the third blade...
Its not perpetual motion. Its the Magnue Effect, causes by pressure differetial. It only lasts as long as there is wong. This is an energy generating machine, not a perpetual motion machine.
This would seam to be on the same principal as a windmill. although I believe a windmill would be more effecient. Can we have some specs on this mill.
what a waste
diegofacundouri 1 week ago
sieht Sceiße aus!
zdfshjg 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Anything that's not a 400 foot tall eyesore is more welcome than more 400 foot tall eyesores.
4aSteadyStateEconomy 1 month ago
Comment removed
4aSteadyStateEconomy 1 month ago
I want to buy a million of these generators!! I will be rich!! RICH!!!!!!!
sok8888 2 months ago
how can that thing spin??? -_-
matijasajko1 3 months ago
Is there a fluid visualization graphic for this design?
ChrisjayH1 3 months ago
w w w diymagneticmotor com for FREE energy, anyone has tried it?
kesto444 5 months ago
Dutch Windmill. The poster is Turkish.
m1aws 5 months ago
I have to agree with smbor2 here. the rollers would completly destroy the way wind moves across the blades. with the larger turbans such as Vestas V100 and GE Gen10 the blades need to rotate in order to match the outside wind speed. the blade design here would not work at all for serious power generating wind turbans.
john101477 5 months ago
I like this idea in theory. However you would be relying on viscous flow over the cylinders to rotate them and contribute to the magnus effect. The magnus effect will not be optimised the way a propeller is due to your design not accounting for vaiable pitch. Furthermore you completely destroy the profile of the aerofoil on the propeller with the inclusing of the cylinders. The magnus effect is inferior for thrust and hence why engines use blades rather than rotating cylinders!
smbor2 6 months ago
Before you get to carried away, read about how many wind power generators are already built, and how little they operate, and how little power they actually contribute.
homskoult 7 months ago
CHROME IS THE WAY TO GO! :D
J88Wolf 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Great Video! Anyone wanting to purchase your own wind turbine DIY kit or parts for your Sovereign independence. Don't be a slave to the electric companies. 1500 Watt all inclusive turbine kit for about $1,500. Go Soveriegn! We have everything from charge controllers to Inverters. Buy one today! visit Sovereign's Depot @ sovdepot.com
indibry 8 months ago
Its so easy to make things work in a CGI program.
Just like the flying cars in the star wars movies.
MrHobiecat 9 months ago
@MrHobiecat Then see the other video's off the poster.
m1aws 5 months ago
@m1aws couldnt he get all the bullKwrap in one video?!
MrHobiecat 5 months ago
@m1aws there are NO real prototypes of this POS in any of the poster's other videos.
MrHobiecat 5 months ago
@MrHobiecat
/watch?v=RC8Qe--wB1c
/watch?v=xC9DYd_LVaQ
I guess these are CGI too.
m1aws 5 months ago
@m1aws again, those are NOT the configuration shown in this video, and apparently they are being spun by hand or by a motor, because a cylinder blade is NOT self starting.
MrHobiecat 5 months ago
@MrHobiecat There are no sizable "self starting" turbines, anywhere.
You complained they did not exist outside cgi.
The power would be leeched from the main rotor. And??? Everything is in within an infrastructure.
These are simulations to assess real world efficiency.
m1aws 5 months ago
@m1aws ALL the three blade wind generators used all over the world are self starting.
what is your part of the action in this scam video? these people are all the same, they are not trying to SELL windmills, they are looking for suckers to 'invest' in their great new idea
and by 'invest' I mean you give them your money and you never see it again.
The dynamics of wind generators has been well understood for HUNDREDS OF YEARS. The POS simulated in this video is BS!
MrHobiecat 5 months ago
@MrHobiecat
Scam? This was is Dutch University experiment.
Now you are beginning to sound like an idiot. Stop it!
Yes, they are all self starting after application of electricity. Try knocking down the control tower of a wind turbine farm and they cease to function. Shut down. Simple as.
Oh, here's an irony for you. Installation of turbines like state funded bomb making factories, errr, nuke plants. ARE expensive! But in this case the fuel is free. Don't you want your crippling debts paid for?
m1aws 5 months ago
@m1aws Oh geeze, My BAD!
I didnt realize Holland and TURKEY are the same country!
MrHobiecat 5 months ago
me and my friends went under a windmill last night, they are f***ing big!!! you know how big these blades would have to be
18rubiks 9 months ago
So it's a self-starting with self turning Flettner rotor in each blade?
tsbrownie 9 months ago
the cylinder turn without energy band produce no energy, that is very important scientific advance. Are we yet ready for this out of this world technologie?
nononsenseinrational 10 months ago
i'd like a bird to go in there..
MrLillejeppe 10 months ago
thats pretty damn cool
jakubpauch 10 months ago
this would not work!!! the spinning mechanisims on each blade would act as a gyro and wouldent like to spin
brownbrve 11 months ago
Comment removed
astrialkil 11 months ago
@brownbrve Maybe that's why there hasn't been an update since 2007!
astrialkil 11 months ago
@brownbrve
Bro, you're right it wouldn't work...Now if you filled up those spinning watchajiblets with gerbils then it would have no other choice but to work.
CaptCrewSock 10 months ago
too loud :)
redible 11 months ago
does it produce more energy than a regular turbine, is it worth the extra cost, too many moving parts, seems heavy, not safe for birds,
omarabs 1 year ago
I would think they'd still have the same problems as other turbines with the blade design (Ice throw, flicker, blades breaking due to high wind stress, etc)
anoniab 1 year ago
that must be what chuck norris shaves with
fintogive 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But the Oil coporations life depends on covering this up,Get a motor that needs no gas or electric input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
intermitrj 1 year ago
OHHHHHHH
kerkukli67 1 year ago
When shit hits the- ummm how do you even describe this thing?!?!
DJstagen 1 year ago
siiiiick
100grapes 1 year ago
WRONG
omgwowface 1 year ago
I would be surprised if this even turned. The centrifugal forces generated by the spinning 'cones' would cause havoc for the 'blades'.
noreplyism 1 year ago 2
It would be funny if one of those broke...
Hedeskog89 1 year ago
I can't find enough words to describe how stupid it is... Moving parts inside blades... A mouse with a brick in the a*s will generate more wind energy than this turbine...
lu4wiy 1 year ago
what would happen if someone put a lazer on the windmill tho.
wesley2348 1 year ago
Brilliant concept..It is encouraging to see innovations related to wind energy and other alternate sources of energy. Increasing demand for energy has opened up markets for the renewable energy sector. Solar, wind, geothermal, and hydropower are the alternate energy sources that the world is recognizing, in order to cut down greenhouse gas emissions. Transformer Company, Pacific Crest Transformers has many articles and whitepapers on this emerging area.
pacificcresttrans 1 year ago
thumbs up if u thought this looked badass from the picture but when u got here it was gay looking...
freakofnature1974 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I invented a breakthrough source of energy, which contradicts the law of conservation of energy. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena which contradict the law of energy conservation. It will cost about $1200 to make a 6 kW generator in mass production. Value of the energy produced yearly about $5400. I am looking for $300 000 for a prototype and for $3M for patents.
H. Tomasz Grzybowski
tel. +48-512-933-540
henrykay01 1 year ago
"Everyone who is related in this field is invited to share your thoughts and ideas with us."
Im thinking about joining this field just so that i can let you know i think your a homosexual....
myjizzureye 1 year ago
Annyoning thing ;l
herojohan88 1 year ago
thumbs down. You need to study aerodynamics.
walperstyle 1 year ago
I have a feeling this one's contrasting rotations will act like dampers on bridge contructions and bring the whole thing to a stop or at least kill its presumed efficiency. That's just from a first look. Maybe a prototype has already been made that disproves my belief.
WhoDoYouWant 1 year ago
why are does it need to be spinning 2 ways?
MadHatterTruth 1 year ago
@MadHatterTruth why are does u not know how to spell ya retard?
KODAKGUYNUMBER1 1 year ago
Magnus effect
MadHatterTruth 1 year ago
wonderful; circles within a circle...
NOCOMPLACENCYCOM 1 year ago
alot of moving parts= alot of repairs
tmg996 1 year ago 11
watch out for the VIBRATIONS
thankyou0 1 year ago
CG, next time use a refraction and reflexion map on your turbineblades, put a noise modifier on the tree's(as you did on the clouds)!!
and dim the radiosity on the blades.... _0_
TomB455 1 year ago
I have built a non wind turbine belt conveyor turbine cog driver it may sound a bit complicated but it's very similar to having a dog and still barking yourself abit pointless but don't be deterred alot of people spend hours and hours a day building absolute worthless rubbish and you never know by some miracle something might look good or even work, but please don't get too optimistic it might lead to much dissapointment :)
fingerspies 1 year ago
Must be SUPER windy there to get that huge thing to turn so fast o.o
ipodchik 1 year ago
Don't write off this idea. It has more moving parts, but these parts move slowly compared to a turbine blade and take up less space. Making turbines safer so they can be put in more places is important.
wildblue2 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
FAKE!!!
phantom1000A 2 years ago
too much complex structure and can't be energy efficient imho
chrach 2 years ago 3
It looks like there is such a disconnect between the actual wind energy and the horizontal axis. There's no direct force.. correct? If so, you could maybe hold this turbine shaft down with an index finger. It's definitely a work of art in design and thought, but mecanically it loses all its torque I think? Unless maybe I don't understand it. The cylinders, are they geared to the horizontal shaft? It's allot of moving parts, more parts equal more failure, friction, maintenance. Cool Look.
HomeWindTurbines7 2 years ago
Seems like more moving parts than conventional turbines, may be harder to maintain and service.
tantpwei 2 years ago 2
Once perpetual motion has a way to be made possible, the energy crisis will be solved. That would probably need some chamber with absolutely no gravity... SOMEONE GET WORKING
Flarrm09 2 years ago
mezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzmerizing..............
MrWalleye 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey, check out my website at ScientificallyGreener(Dot) com and get all the new and improved Equipments to build or buy your own solar and wind energy systems ScientificallyGreener(Dot) com is a website that sells the most modern environmental products available
scientificallygreene 2 years ago
Gillette... the best a man can have!!!
jheredi84 2 years ago 54
"can get".....Gillette, the best a man can get
IIB20VTEC 2 years ago
@jheredi84 hehehehe
w4seem 1 year ago
@jheredi84 LOL what!?
presbarkeep 10 months ago
i prefer, the normal one, they loo
k less ugly
MrMusician100 2 years ago
Comment removed
bbaker904 2 years ago
Looks like a francy Shaver...YOU TAKE ONE STROKE..IT TAKES THREE!
PornFlakes21 2 years ago 3
its neat but creepy at the same time lol and its waay to bulky.. get it to slice through the air without making a sword out of the blasted thing...
ccalvinn27 2 years ago
Kids would find that scary
StapledNote 2 years ago
Nuclear power costs have been artificially inflated due to politics in most countries. The actual cost to the end user, including a comfortable profit for the power company, comes to less than $0.02 per kilowatt-hour, and there's NOTHING on Earth that can compete with that, either now or in the foreseeable future. You're the ignorant one, baur02: Wind power has been used for thousands of years, but has been largely abandoned since more reliable sources were developed in the Industrial Age.
upajos 2 years ago
Actually large scale hydro has been the cheapest source of electricity for last 100 years. A hydro plant repays its investment cost within 10 years and then gives nearly free power for another 90 at least. Plus it is dispatchable. The main drawback is the very limited number of acceptable sites for large hydro dams. China had to move 1.2 million people out of the way to make room for Three Gorges. They can do that in China. No way in the US.
Teratornis 2 years ago
It's even worse than you say. In California, land of Luddite loonies, they're dismantling hydro projects and preventing construction of new ones or even upgrades of existing ones to protect some species of non-native fish, frog or whatever. The push is for wind and solar, so our lights go out at night and when the wind stops blowing. Now the nuts complain that windmills are "too loud" and that they "kill birds". Madness.
upajos 2 years ago
It's like David MacKay says in his video and book: if people want the lights to go on, they cannot be against every single form of power generation.
The Chinese don't seem to have a problem with wind-NIMBYs. They more than doubled their installed wind power capacity each year from 2005 through 2008 and will nearly double it again this year to over 20 GW.
Teratornis 2 years ago
No matter how fancy the wind turbine is, it stops generating when the wind stops blowing. I like my lights, my computer, my entertainment systems and my electric appliances to work even at night when there's no sun and no wind. Germany is seriously reconsidering their foray into wind power now due to cost and reliability problems. The only solution for the long term is nuclear power.
upajos 2 years ago
alright then you pay a premium for your electricity. the only thing holding wind power back is ignorant people who dont like change. every form of power came through these phases, even your precious nuclear. so relax, step back and appreciate that people are trying to make a difference for the now and futur.
baur02 2 years ago
It looks like a good idea, but I wouldn't be surprised if the math involved proved it to be less energy efficient than a regular turbine with straight blades.
velveetaslingshot 2 years ago 2
Only retards fall for this shit
TelfLad 2 years ago
Well some of the best ideas came from the failures of others. So take it easy.
chavenor 2 years ago
I suggest that you build one yourself. Building your own wind turbine is actually a lot easier than one could imagine. You can contact me if you have any questions.
GreenEnergyToday 2 years ago
Just 1 problem...
Birds.
drcaos 2 years ago
Careful! It seems you've been drinking just a little too much of that environmentalist Kool Aid!
upajos 2 years ago
Who is talking about enviroment?
Birs + gears (or something rotating like a turbine) = problem ;)
And no... the nuclear power it´s only amazing for my grandma.
2 super sources of energy:
Hydrogen and Heat...
(yes, heat, and Im not planning to explain the concept)
Ta Ta
drcaos 2 years ago
attach those flashlight shake generators to the dominant arm of each teenage boy in America and you have your energy problems solved, with a lot leftover for turd world countries.
goyherder 2 years ago 70
goyherder I like your thinking! A whole lot of wasted energy. Could set up a college fund for them if you gave them a % kickback on what is sold to the grid.
2 problems solved!
canonphoto 2 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
DominickBlack 2 years ago
damn straight XD
dudemanguyperson42 2 years ago
@goyherder hahahahaha
caboolturescumbag 11 months ago
@goyherder LMFAO, good one man!
HostileHST 7 months ago
@goyherder LOL Did you actually intend to type "turd world" ?
photokanellos 7 months ago
Yeah...heh. You come out with that giant razor and gilette is going to sue your ass...
dontsend36 2 years ago
Wow.... Now we have a windmill that puts out more energy.
TheAnderson1996 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That's truly amazing! I slashed my electric bill in half! look here: solar.xfollow.me (Copy to your browser's address bar)
iknowyoux 2 years ago
i dnt under stand the spinging turbines within the blades. they lead no where and are just obstructions to the wind and break it before the wind hits the blades slowing it down
RockingMinors 2 years ago
the turbines within the blades generate electricity too, they get whatever energy the wind produces
r3inhout 2 years ago
That thing looks cool can I get some gasoline powered ones for decorations at my ranch?
freddytk421 2 years ago
LOL
atillathehun3 2 years ago 2
name of song?
Kentuxi 2 years ago 3
lol
disndat11 2 years ago 4
era un video en el que nos muestra como tres latas de aquarius pueden ser usadas utilmente
albertone100 2 years ago
k koño era eso?
Kentuxi 2 years ago
nice animation but if it was to be put into practice and have more use than a roast dinner at the local vegetarian convention. it would need much bigger blades. "too much going on in such a small area"
YZFR1mart 2 years ago
Getting as much energy efficiency as possible from renewable sources will mean that there's likely to be a lot going on in a small area. The aim of it being small is likely to mean that more of them can be installed on the same site. If it works, it's good!
hungrygit 2 years ago
if you don't understand why a wind turbine covering a small area is a bad thing w.r.t getting energy from the wind...... wow
daviclond 2 years ago
As I understand, the large wind turbines have brakes that prevent them from spinning too fast. You've probably seen the videos of the failing on here. If large w.t.s need slowing down, maybe there's quite an energy gain using smaller turbines in the same area. If that's right, it's just an issue of cost isn't it?
hungrygit 2 years ago
it looks good, but there is no audio explantion of whats going on or words on the screen
lculliver 2 years ago 3
Note the summary at the upper right of your screen, then look up "Magnus effect" in Wikipedia.
upajos 2 years ago
magnus effect also known as spindrift
MondoMedia7 2 years ago
How could the rotating cylinders be an advantage or improvement?
middletech 3 years ago 3
more energy
hotwheel4live 3 years ago
at least it caused me to wiki magnus effect...
ewmegoolies 3 years ago
All that's missing on this one are three coloured spheres extending vertically from the mast and bobbing up and down at varying heights. Whistles could also be attached to the blades for added absurdity.
wingman63 3 years ago 3
looks cool, but i am sure this installation cost a lot of money. Hey we need cheap and affordable wind power!! that possibly can be used also in 3rd world countries
danielkoepf 3 years ago
this is like when they came out with the battery powered mach 3 razor and tried to convince us that our regular ones were not giving a close enough shave? or is it a lot more efficient?
lutherdriggers 3 years ago 4
why Flettner rotors?
tomterahedrob 3 years ago
Many parts imply break-downs and high up-keep costs.
Pecherin72 3 years ago 6
Many moving parts with high kinetic energy. Cool idea, though.
WarAgainstFutility 3 years ago
How does that work?
Zovex11 3 years ago
Magnus Effect is also known as "spindrift"
dobermans4you2 3 years ago
Looks cool, but I have no clue how it works!
Random1800 3 years ago
check out my wind power vids...
windpowerrocks 3 years ago
It's like a gyroscope on steroids.
dipper64 3 years ago 2
sorry...but that was my initial reaction.
Could this really work?
dipper64 3 years ago
they can't even keep the current ones from spontaneously exploding from high speed winds. D:
Mokurentate 3 years ago
It's like a gyroscope on crack.
BrooklynNYC777 3 years ago
It does seem like a good idea, although, the surface area of the cylinders need to be increased to make it more efficient. So the useful wind energy is putting in, is effectively pushing it round, but the cylinders need a slightly bigger surface area to get more for for a greater distance.
I'm not entirely sure though, you may have already done the maths to find that size is most efficient. It seems like a good idea seeing as how many catch on fire! the cylinders will slow it down slightly.
mgray7777 3 years ago
Mehmetoglu birader bizim Turkler youtube'un gereksiz videolarinda birbirlerine sovuyorlar su anda ama seni farkedememisler.insallah yabancilara kaptirmadan patentini alabilirsin. bir elektrik muhendisi olarak soyleyebilirim ki eger bahsettigin gibi %30 luk bir iyilestirme yapmissan ruzgar teknolojisini tamamen degistirebilirsin.
Calismalarinda basarilar
hackercanavar 3 years ago
Its huge nd would have a visual impact.
khanz004 3 years ago
not to mention kill every bird in 100 square miles, endangered and all. These windmills are a blight; ugly, inefficient and raining hell on the avian population. Just wait to see what happens to the ecosystem when all the birds are dead at the base of these ridiculous windmills..
sonick808 3 years ago
you re right ! we should take down all those windmills ... and since we re at it ... stop all oil production ! as you know it does kill sea animals too! stop driving renault, citroens, fords and those vw beetles ... they re ugly, inefficient and killing all kind of mammals crossing highways !!!
zozolelapin 3 years ago
Fair comment. These are both environmental issues, so a balance has to be found. I think that generating more electricity in the same area as larger turbines would reduce the amount of wind farms required. Are simple ideas like caging around the turbine proven failures?
hungrygit 2 years ago
A beautiful machine in it's complexity, but hard to beat the old Aeromotors.
mbrouss151 3 years ago
Looks like an add for Norelco Shavers, 100 blades to give you a close shave. The first blade fakes the whisker out, the second blade splits it at the atomic level, the third blade...
KarasCyborg 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
^^^...the third blades slices ur lips off so u shut the fuck up?
mookixox 3 years ago
at least he's old enough to shave you cunt
yahoopig 3 years ago
What's the point?
jigglesnap 3 years ago
Umm... It is not possible to have perpetual motion.
phylumkingdom 3 years ago
Its not perpetual motion. Its the Magnue Effect, causes by pressure differetial. It only lasts as long as there is wong. This is an energy generating machine, not a perpetual motion machine.
xiangyik 3 years ago
Meh... Gyroscopic action would stop it cold.
zaphodb777 4 years ago 4
Too many moving parts. I'ld predict this concept will not find wide adaption in the industry since maintainability seems to be costly.
fn132788 4 years ago 3
How much more efficient is this than a regular wind turbine?
jizzmonger 4 years ago 2
It would be great to have some specs....weight...output...moving parts...cost...comparisons etc..
bellaggio1770 4 years ago
This would seam to be on the same principal as a windmill. although I believe a windmill would be more effecient. Can we have some specs on this mill.
gibsonrockin247 4 years ago
they proberbly fixed to a gear .thus when the whole thing turnes round one axis they spin i think.
andybrad69 4 years ago
Nope, its the Magnus effect. Someone read!
xiangyik 3 years ago
how the hell do the axes turn without any external power?
Phoenykilla 4 years ago
this is a new design that made me say "WOW" but whether it will produce energy or not, it's a different story
PoconoPlaces 4 years ago
If It turns it will produce electric power.Spirals are very efficient our
Milky Way galaxy is evidence of this
genius.
SlydeInfinityUK 4 years ago
so the milky way is a gind wind mill?
uh boy thank you, i was thinking there was no air in space!
gabberch 4 years ago
This will not produce any power
seshkanuri 4 years ago
Man, you are dumb, this type of concept has already been made by the Germans decades ago and proven that it works.
bellaggio1770 4 years ago
to complicated...
nahuelito2007 4 years ago
Computer modeled?
oscarian 4 years ago