@StopSpamming1 Yeah Right. You guys are hopeless. No matter how much ever proof is given for the existence of a creator, Manufacturer or an architect of the Universe, people like you are never going to believe.
It doesn't change anything. 1.5 billion Muslims are not going to listen to you.
@StopSpamming1 Give me your e-mail ID and I will give you proof after proof after proof for the existence of a Creator.
If you believe in the baseless theory of Evolution then put all necessary elements for life together and sit besides it for 1 billion years and find out if some thing happens. If you can make a frog out of it, then I will believe there is no God. If you can't then shut up and find out who can make such a thing and better than it.
When will you get it into your head that there is an opinion, there is evidence and then you have proof?
Can't you even get the basics right? And then you claim that you, yes you, a nobody here on YouTube can falsify something the biggest and best brains on this planet would give their left arm for - to falsify the Theory of Evolution.
@StopSpamming1 My dear good friend, yes I'm a nobody to comment about anything but its not my opinion that I will give you. Some in the scientific community also have the same opinion that Evolution Theory has come to a dead end.
(2) Apart from the general fallacy of these pseudo-scientific claims, individual claims for scientific knowledge in the Quran invariably rest on two fallacies:
1. The verse does not verily describe what is claimed: the claim is false.
2. The claimed knowledge was already known long before Muhammad: the claim is ignorant.
There is no verse in the Quran, for which scientific insight is claimed, which does not fall under either one or both fallacies. There is no science in the Quran!
Then please instead of wasting our time with your objections, bring us forward your proof about the so called knowledge that was known before the Prophet(PBUH) , for i can tell you , many people know how to spell and write False! and There is No!! There is No!!
Migoush, instead of firing of for no reason, dont waste your own time and quickly read my next comment, which you seem to have overlooked.
Just an example; there is an abundance of debunking this gullible belief in scientific signs in the Quran. And, consequently, there are no scientific miracles in the Quran. I understand that believing in miracles gives a great personal satisfaction, but it is based on exactly nothing.
Otherwise, the general proof is already in my first comment.
(1) Of course, Ibrahms, if you were really interested in such information, you certainly would have done some research and have found it. Now you demand me to give you that info and I fear that your demand is purely rhetorical.
However, if you really want to know, I refer you to the Greek physician Claudius Galen, who lived in the 2nd century CE.
(2) Galens account of embryology is found in his work De Semine (On the semen) dated around AD 150, and he perceived 4 stages of foetal development and describes these in significantly more detail than provided by Sura 23:13-14. The 4 stages mentioned in 23:13-14 mirror Galens description. So, these verses do not mention anything new and it is ignorant to attribute miraculous scientific knowledge to them. Furthermore, Galen was wrong, and so is the Quran and thus the claim is false.
(3) Finally, Ibrahms, there is nothing staggering in the Quranic pseudo-scientific analogies, that have become a hype recently. None of these analogies holds, either historically or scientifically or both. They have all been refuted and clinging to this myth of miracles by devoted Muslims seriously degrades the image of Islam. Modern Islamic scholars acknowledge this and have pinpointed the logical flaws in this hype. Do you really need these pseudo-miracles to remain faithful?
(4) Ibrahims, if you lean on Keith Moores publication in the 1986 JIMA, Reference to Embryology in the Quran, I advise you to critically read it. It is a stereotypic example of reading modern facts into obscure ancient texts. German has a great word for this: hineininterpretieren. This pseudo-scientific article is a shameful example of pasting unrelated matter together in order to conclude something that was predetermined to begin with. This is pseudo-science!
(1) Science observes phenomena and develops natural theories explaining them in such a manner that these theories have a reliable predictive value. No verse in the Quran meets this characteristic of modern science. What do you expect? It is an ancient medieval text!
This debunks all pseudo-scientific claims about the Quran, all based on reading modern science into ancient texts (hinein-interpretieren). These claims are therefore meaningless logical fallacies. There is no science in the Quran!
what the !
STOPSPAMING and evonutter the 2 s utub shills got nothing else to do,
j400wel 1 year ago
There is no science in the Koran!
Why does not a single Muslim take one example and prove it point by point?
A 14 year old girl in a non-Islamic state knows more about embryology than the Koran.
At last: the angel! I was waiting for the cute angel. At 04.00 we finally get the scientific proof!
Menstruation is an illness! Avoid contact with women during menstruation. Why am I not dead?
Avoid sex! It can be lethal. Drive a car or jump out of a plane without a parachute, it is much safer.
StopSpamming1 2 years ago
Comment removed
saramelad 8 months ago
@StopSpamming1 Yeah Right. You guys are hopeless. No matter how much ever proof is given for the existence of a creator, Manufacturer or an architect of the Universe, people like you are never going to believe.
It doesn't change anything. 1.5 billion Muslims are not going to listen to you.
ahamedali1981 4 months ago
@ahamedali1981
What proof? If there is proof I would be wrong and will shut up.
And were the 1.5 billion Christians right who thought Galileo was wrong and Earth was the centre of the Universe?
You guys are funny. Repeating a claim does not make it any more right. Do you believe in my double-headed red dragon I have in the garden?
StopSpamming1 4 months ago
@StopSpamming1 Give me your e-mail ID and I will give you proof after proof after proof for the existence of a Creator.
If you believe in the baseless theory of Evolution then put all necessary elements for life together and sit besides it for 1 billion years and find out if some thing happens. If you can make a frog out of it, then I will believe there is no God. If you can't then shut up and find out who can make such a thing and better than it.
ahamedali1981 4 months ago
@ahamedali1981
When will you get it into your head that there is an opinion, there is evidence and then you have proof?
Can't you even get the basics right? And then you claim that you, yes you, a nobody here on YouTube can falsify something the biggest and best brains on this planet would give their left arm for - to falsify the Theory of Evolution.
I feel sorry for people like you. It is so sad!
StopSpamming1 4 months ago
@StopSpamming1 My dear good friend, yes I'm a nobody to comment about anything but its not my opinion that I will give you. Some in the scientific community also have the same opinion that Evolution Theory has come to a dead end.
ahamedali1981 4 months ago
@ahamedali1981
Oh dear!
} "Some in the scientific community"
Who would that be?
What is the scientific community?
No, Sir, you are gullible and believe nonsense. But if that is what you want, it's fine.
StopSpamming1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(3) And if this logic does not convince you, do some research yourself; there is ample scientific evidence that there is no science in the Quran.
Just an example:
Does the Qur'an Have any scientific Miracles?
w w w. mukto-mona. com /Articles /avijit /Quran_miracle. htm
w w w. mukto-mona. com /Articles /avijit /Quran_miracle2. htm
(remove blank spaces)
There is no science in the Quran!
evospecies 2 years ago
(2) Apart from the general fallacy of these pseudo-scientific claims, individual claims for scientific knowledge in the Quran invariably rest on two fallacies:
1. The verse does not verily describe what is claimed: the claim is false.
2. The claimed knowledge was already known long before Muhammad: the claim is ignorant.
There is no verse in the Quran, for which scientific insight is claimed, which does not fall under either one or both fallacies. There is no science in the Quran!
evospecies 2 years ago
There is No... There is No... There is No...
Then please instead of wasting our time with your objections, bring us forward your proof about the so called knowledge that was known before the Prophet(PBUH) , for i can tell you , many people know how to spell and write False! and There is No!! There is No!!
migoush121 2 years ago
Migoush, instead of firing of for no reason, dont waste your own time and quickly read my next comment, which you seem to have overlooked.
Just an example; there is an abundance of debunking this gullible belief in scientific signs in the Quran. And, consequently, there are no scientific miracles in the Quran. I understand that believing in miracles gives a great personal satisfaction, but it is based on exactly nothing.
Otherwise, the general proof is already in my first comment.
evospecies 2 years ago
First: give us one example of embryologic knowledge before Muhammad revelation that remotely resembles what the Quran describes.
Second: the analogy between the Quran facts and today's facts is staggering.
ibrahms 2 years ago
(1) Of course, Ibrahms, if you were really interested in such information, you certainly would have done some research and have found it. Now you demand me to give you that info and I fear that your demand is purely rhetorical.
However, if you really want to know, I refer you to the Greek physician Claudius Galen, who lived in the 2nd century CE.
evospecies 2 years ago
(2) Galens account of embryology is found in his work De Semine (On the semen) dated around AD 150, and he perceived 4 stages of foetal development and describes these in significantly more detail than provided by Sura 23:13-14. The 4 stages mentioned in 23:13-14 mirror Galens description. So, these verses do not mention anything new and it is ignorant to attribute miraculous scientific knowledge to them. Furthermore, Galen was wrong, and so is the Quran and thus the claim is false.
evospecies 2 years ago
(3) Finally, Ibrahms, there is nothing staggering in the Quranic pseudo-scientific analogies, that have become a hype recently. None of these analogies holds, either historically or scientifically or both. They have all been refuted and clinging to this myth of miracles by devoted Muslims seriously degrades the image of Islam. Modern Islamic scholars acknowledge this and have pinpointed the logical flaws in this hype. Do you really need these pseudo-miracles to remain faithful?
evospecies 2 years ago
(4) Ibrahims, if you lean on Keith Moores publication in the 1986 JIMA, Reference to Embryology in the Quran, I advise you to critically read it. It is a stereotypic example of reading modern facts into obscure ancient texts. German has a great word for this: hineininterpretieren. This pseudo-scientific article is a shameful example of pasting unrelated matter together in order to conclude something that was predetermined to begin with. This is pseudo-science!
evospecies 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(1) Science observes phenomena and develops natural theories explaining them in such a manner that these theories have a reliable predictive value. No verse in the Quran meets this characteristic of modern science. What do you expect? It is an ancient medieval text!
This debunks all pseudo-scientific claims about the Quran, all based on reading modern science into ancient texts (hinein-interpretieren). These claims are therefore meaningless logical fallacies. There is no science in the Quran!
evospecies 2 years ago