I just saw a documentary on tv of a guy in germany who rebuilt a wood fuel car.and said it can reach up to 80km/hr downhill and can go for approx 200km on a load of wood ,which looked roughly the size of this car you show.are your numbers simular?also is it legal to register this type of car in sweden,usa and australia?i think a car like this in moderation,and proving you have your own farmland to supply wood etc for a permit,might be ok as a alternative.provided there aren't health issues smoke
Fossil fuels of any kind are obsolete. Electric cars outperform internal combustion.
WE ALL NEED TO STOP USING FOSSIL FUELS NOW! The rest of the world knows this, even China, Iran, Germany & the Saudi's. They are all building wind & solar plants as fast as they can.
Massive public works programs got us out of the depression. America needs a massive green energy program now. Upgrade the grid, re-employ fossil fuel workers in OUR green sector.
@9999RuneScape999 thanks for the reply. I just finished an article on my blog you might like. It is called "Where will we get all of this electricity from?"
Same thing happened here in NZ durring WW2. The gasifier was mounted on a trailer and towed behind the vehicle, some had a flexible bag on the roof to act as a gas storage buffer. The trailers were mounted behind taxis, buses, trucks etc.
Lots of interesting stuff like this, wood alcohol is also pretty interesting. All the crazies talking about hydrogen fuel cells are on the right track, they just have the wrong fuel. Wood alcohol fuels cells are great. I'm also with ChrisP, i think biodiesel from Algae will be a major fuel.
Here's some interesting facts: Sweden Produces more wood than it takes down, and burning wood completely like his releases no more co2 than it would if it decomposes in the forrest, ergo co2 neutral, unlike fossil fules.
Wood is not viable but Algae is. It doubles its biomass in under 24 hours and due to the fact it is made up of single celled organisms its available surface area to take up atmospheric carbon is ideal. Nothing can exceed its ability to capture the suns energy to produce the hydrocarbon fuels we need to run our society. Best of all is that it is carbon neutral, able to absorb atmosmspheric carbon in real time at rates that could one day equal its release into the environment.
The major problem. Wood is not a viable fuel, not because it won't work but because we just don't have enough of it in the world to use. We see this in the third world is they start chopping down all the trees to use them for fuel. This is why rocket stoves are pushed to 3rd world to lower burn rates of wood. Wood gas can work but it can't replace oil, coal and natural gas. Why? because the BTU content is to low and the BTU burn rate to high. Wood even chicken crap can run a car.
Agree Firecatgreg. Transportation with wood gas must come with great responsibility in several areas. Most important task in the world is cuting down on energy consumption.
we are all carbon based and no matter wat you do every tree will die at somepoint and release "pollutants" into the atmosphere.....so why not use it for energy?!
Some of these comments demonstrate the instinctive "no" we all are trained to think and say. Our Swedish brothers are trying to show us that the technology can work not that we have to cut down all of our trees to do it. Where do you think wood scraps from Home Depot are going right now? How about tires or coffee grinds or yard clippings you so conveniently throw away into your trash bins and get to forget until next week? Please educate yourself before knocking people and their inventions.
Good point TommyKickslt. I do beleve that the most important task is cuting down on energy consumption. Then it's possible to use alternative fuels. We have several generations coming ahead and they have the right to have a stable climate and a living earth.
yeah ok, they ran it on wood. this is just a demonstration of principle. but that same setup could easily run on any relatively dry biomass. (corn stalks, wheat chaff, garbage, grass clippings, leftover breakfast.)
so no, the forests won't be gone in short order, but if we play our cards right the landfills could!
simply cool. But wood gas is not the most efficient way to turn wood into usable fuel. i wound if possable to make a make michaine to make biooil. Then your car all you need to do is boil the biooil and burn the biooil vapor.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
you have to dry the wood first in a kiln or naturally, a fresh tree, dry or not is going to be far too wet to burn with any success. so i can safely say that you sir are the idiot...
Now is this carbonizing the wood. So its not releasing the carbon into the air. If that is the case then it is environmentally friendly. This is turning wood into a hydrogen type gas for the engine to burn.
Which is no CO2, which is what the process of burning the wood at extremely high heat does. If you burn almost anything at 1000°C(1832°F) it will have virtually no carbon entering the air, and forms charcoal. Which if put back into the ground is extremely useful for plant life.
It is environmental friendly as long as you don´t cut down all wood. It lets out CO2. But becouse its not from oil, it does not add extra CO2 to the environment.
The gas contains 20% CO and 20% H2. When it passes the engine, it becomes energy and CO2 + H2O.
Ya budy just like the population growing to 10 billion will be regulated by the planet until the banker, war profiteer, oil moguls, reptile swine you listen to can figure out how to profit from the final judgment day. The gas that should be comming out of the other end of your body is natural too.
the ONLY disinformation is the climate change HOAX ..its sad that so many of you are ignorant and believe anything the so called elites tell you ..man CANNOT harm the earth to the point they say ..they are LIARS ..their agenda is simple...to take away freedom and quality of life for everyone but themselves ..and i said CO2 not CO ...do some research
So that layer of smog that sits over NYC is healthy? CO2, CO is contributing to these same effects on peoples health. Kids have an alarming rate of asthma, and still increasing. These are facts, not lies. Cancer is at an all time high, you think these levels produced from cars is not doing this? Must be fake, hoax, etc. Yea, sure. Its all a lie.
What you see are sulfides. Either way sirhoax is right. Cancer is off the charts and there was almost no cancer many years ago and there is almost no cancer in cultures that have no industry. Using wood/syn/producer gas is not a bad idea. No chemical additives, co neutral. BTW, speaking of cancer, have you heard what they add to jet fuel now?
wow, fantastic job guys, just out of interest is the power output the same more, or less than petrol (gas) ?
sasop117 3 weeks ago
I just saw a documentary on tv of a guy in germany who rebuilt a wood fuel car.and said it can reach up to 80km/hr downhill and can go for approx 200km on a load of wood ,which looked roughly the size of this car you show.are your numbers simular?also is it legal to register this type of car in sweden,usa and australia?i think a car like this in moderation,and proving you have your own farmland to supply wood etc for a permit,might be ok as a alternative.provided there aren't health issues smoke
Bluewolf2028 2 months ago
Even though it's a Volvo (politics) I favorited this anyway lol
Begbucks 8 months ago
Fossil fuels of any kind are obsolete. Electric cars outperform internal combustion.
WE ALL NEED TO STOP USING FOSSIL FUELS NOW! The rest of the world knows this, even China, Iran, Germany & the Saudi's. They are all building wind & solar plants as fast as they can.
Massive public works programs got us out of the depression. America needs a massive green energy program now. Upgrade the grid, re-employ fossil fuel workers in OUR green sector.
BadGasGoodWind 1 year ago
@BadGasGoodWind "WE ALL NEED TO STOP USING FOSSIL FUELS NOW!"
That's not realistic for some of us...
thedarkone2134 10 months ago
@thedarkone2134 neither is killing off the planet
BadGasGoodWind 7 months ago
@BadGasGoodWind Yes, but it's hard to just stop in a sec.
9999RuneScape999 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@9999RuneScape999 thanks for the reply. I just finished an article on my blog you might like. It is called "Where will we get all of this electricity from?"
you can read it at
htp://badgasgoodwind.blogspot.com
BadGasGoodWind 5 months ago
How far dose it run on a sack full of wood?
eyechubcunt 1 year ago
you can also run it on dried manure, right?
psycopathicmind 1 year ago
Ypou can use horse dung any organic material can be used.
osrojw 1 year ago
Welcome to the 1940s. Australia was another country where this technology was embraced during wartime fuel rationing.
JBofBrisbane 1 year ago
So basicly this is a steam car now?
cyberlord64 1 year ago
you wanna see my wood ? GAS CAR! LOL
Skid00everest340 1 year ago
it sounds like a diesel engine. i did not know that a diesel would run on wood gas!
wow
MrCurtispedersen 1 year ago
Fan va fräckt !
För jävla kul !
Ska också kolla in i denna problematik :)
mvh
Anders
syncro16se 2 years ago
Same thing happened here in NZ durring WW2. The gasifier was mounted on a trailer and towed behind the vehicle, some had a flexible bag on the roof to act as a gas storage buffer. The trailers were mounted behind taxis, buses, trucks etc.
EnigmaNZ1 2 years ago
This is a great idea i've heard about people in south africa who during ww2 had there car runing on wood gas because oil was being used for tanks
jacosci 2 years ago
If car makers ever make a car that runs on wood as an alternative fuel, the cost of wood would skyrocket.
hackmattr 2 years ago 3
then start cutting those trees in your back yard xD
jonyrock 2 years ago
They already have engines that run on compressed air, oxygen, and methane. I don't think they really care about that whole alt fuel
Biggofwi 2 years ago
lol yea. in a way that would be a bad thing because if they made cars that run on wood then everyone would be cutting trees down.
jkauffman990 1 year ago
Lots of interesting stuff like this, wood alcohol is also pretty interesting. All the crazies talking about hydrogen fuel cells are on the right track, they just have the wrong fuel. Wood alcohol fuels cells are great. I'm also with ChrisP, i think biodiesel from Algae will be a major fuel.
Swansen03 2 years ago
what about shit gas? I reckon that would be better than woodgas
sarcophyllus 2 years ago
hay i saw this guy on national geographic in planet mechanics episode it is great concept to run car on wood gas
codehasbeenbroken 2 years ago
Fred Flintsone WOOD be prooud of you!
Wallabydam 3 years ago 3
Here's some interesting facts: Sweden Produces more wood than it takes down, and burning wood completely like his releases no more co2 than it would if it decomposes in the forrest, ergo co2 neutral, unlike fossil fules.
Sofie72 3 years ago 7
Wood is not viable but Algae is. It doubles its biomass in under 24 hours and due to the fact it is made up of single celled organisms its available surface area to take up atmospheric carbon is ideal. Nothing can exceed its ability to capture the suns energy to produce the hydrocarbon fuels we need to run our society. Best of all is that it is carbon neutral, able to absorb atmosmspheric carbon in real time at rates that could one day equal its release into the environment.
ChrisPCrunchy 3 years ago 2
I like it.... time to build big algae skywells!
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
That garage looks like a fire station from the 60s
msw1000 3 years ago
The major problem. Wood is not a viable fuel, not because it won't work but because we just don't have enough of it in the world to use. We see this in the third world is they start chopping down all the trees to use them for fuel. This is why rocket stoves are pushed to 3rd world to lower burn rates of wood. Wood gas can work but it can't replace oil, coal and natural gas. Why? because the BTU content is to low and the BTU burn rate to high. Wood even chicken crap can run a car.
firecatgreg 3 years ago
Agree Firecatgreg. Transportation with wood gas must come with great responsibility in several areas. Most important task in the world is cuting down on energy consumption.
vedbil 3 years ago
would that thing work if we used other plant matter such as dried grass, sugar cane husk, wheat stalks, rice stalks, corn stalks, dried leaves, ect.
emancoy 3 years ago
@vedbil
said "Most important task in the world is cuting down on energy consumption."
That and finding renewable sources of energy. Sadly so far solar panels are too inefficent with our current technology.
1NX9 11 months ago
It isn't necessary to use wood, since wood gas generators can gasify almost any type of combustible material.
Like garbage.
aarondewindt 3 years ago
I bet we could find alot of fuel in our garbage dumps.
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
we are all carbon based and no matter wat you do every tree will die at somepoint and release "pollutants" into the atmosphere.....so why not use it for energy?!
basssisst 3 years ago
I would love to pull up to a rest stop, pop the lid and stuff in the tire that I just blew out. Imagine the looks! A+ video
disgruntldtoad 3 years ago
Some of these comments demonstrate the instinctive "no" we all are trained to think and say. Our Swedish brothers are trying to show us that the technology can work not that we have to cut down all of our trees to do it. Where do you think wood scraps from Home Depot are going right now? How about tires or coffee grinds or yard clippings you so conveniently throw away into your trash bins and get to forget until next week? Please educate yourself before knocking people and their inventions.
TommyKicksIt 3 years ago 10
Good point TommyKickslt. I do beleve that the most important task is cuting down on energy consumption. Then it's possible to use alternative fuels. We have several generations coming ahead and they have the right to have a stable climate and a living earth.
vedbil 3 years ago
crazy?no!the only sane people on the planet!
tomterahedrob 3 years ago
soon we won't have any wood
MarioFreestyle 3 years ago
Yes we still need to only utilize this sytem for essential motor vehicle services not mass motoring as the forest will be gone in short order.
carstars 3 years ago
yeah ok, they ran it on wood. this is just a demonstration of principle. but that same setup could easily run on any relatively dry biomass. (corn stalks, wheat chaff, garbage, grass clippings, leftover breakfast.)
so no, the forests won't be gone in short order, but if we play our cards right the landfills could!
L33TFooMaster 3 years ago 5
please help me with my gasifier y tried several time to fire the gas but i cant... help me please...
kawayl 3 years ago
bio gas makes the same amount of pollution
basssisst 3 years ago
Yes, but the bio gas comes from a renewable source (in this case wood), and when a new tree grows up it will absorb all the "pollution" again.
Jojoz0 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you are cool, guys, but this is not green energy. we have to avoid pollution. I recomend you read about biogas.
ZAPI2003 3 years ago
simply cool. But wood gas is not the most efficient way to turn wood into usable fuel. i wound if possable to make a make michaine to make biooil. Then your car all you need to do is boil the biooil and burn the biooil vapor.
spark300c 3 years ago
have you tried to use cardboard to make woodgas?
It seems to produce a lot of combustible gas and it starts quickly. for short trips.should be interesting.
josephdupont 3 years ago
men va fan... alla jävla jenkar har alltid nåt i mot oss. vilka va d som uppteckte usa igentligen ? va d inte eroper?
volvo240flak 4 years ago
My Torino had fire in the back, but it didn't have a stove there.
TheDudeJeffLebowski 4 years ago 4
When you were refuelling at the end of the movie, can you do this with the engine still running?
bjddavies 4 years ago
Yes
vedbil 4 years ago
Seems like a lot of work! And that would be bad if you were out driving and ran out of wood..
Bigjohnnywad 4 years ago
You go chop down a damn tree! If you run out of gas you can't go refine oil all by yourself
spongah 4 years ago 2
And burn wet wood?? Are you a fricken idiot?
Bigjohnnywad 4 years ago
Did I say chop down a wet ass tree? Are YOU an idiot? hah
spongah 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you have to dry the wood first in a kiln or naturally, a fresh tree, dry or not is going to be far too wet to burn with any success. so i can safely say that you sir are the idiot...
jtriffo 3 years ago
Haha...fattiga norrlänningar!
pihop 4 years ago
That's great, well done! How long did it take to build it and do the modification?
rockets2space 4 years ago
Two mounths for the first testdrive on woodgas. Four mounths more to get it all completed for the trip around Sweden.
vedbil 4 years ago
whats the consumption?how far does a 100 pounds of wood take you at 50mph?great stuff.thanks.
tomterahedrob 4 years ago
Now is this carbonizing the wood. So its not releasing the carbon into the air. If that is the case then it is environmentally friendly. This is turning wood into a hydrogen type gas for the engine to burn.
Which is no CO2, which is what the process of burning the wood at extremely high heat does. If you burn almost anything at 1000°C(1832°F) it will have virtually no carbon entering the air, and forms charcoal. Which if put back into the ground is extremely useful for plant life.
sirHOAX 4 years ago
It is environmental friendly as long as you don´t cut down all wood. It lets out CO2. But becouse its not from oil, it does not add extra CO2 to the environment.
The gas contains 20% CO and 20% H2. When it passes the engine, it becomes energy and CO2 + H2O.
vedbil 4 years ago
CO2 is CO2..doesn't matter where it comes from..the earth naturally regulates it
DNM35 4 years ago
Ya budy just like the population growing to 10 billion will be regulated by the planet until the banker, war profiteer, oil moguls, reptile swine you listen to can figure out how to profit from the final judgment day. The gas that should be comming out of the other end of your body is natural too.
wiscokiddd 4 years ago
Russia still converts this mix into methanol using catalyst.
cheaphardwarez 4 years ago
Hi sirHOAX , If burn coal or coal powder at 1000 C create any carbon into air? Thanks
fdoca 4 years ago
this is NO carbon crisis...it all a hoax..CO2 is a NATURAL part of the atmosphere...man cant do anything to change that
DNM35 4 years ago
Why don't you go into NYC and tell me carbon monoxide is a natural part of the environment.
Are you really that sheltered? We now know for a fact that water can be used as fuel, and we are still using fossil fuels.
The only hoax is people like yourself spreading disinformation.
sirHOAX 4 years ago
the ONLY disinformation is the climate change HOAX ..its sad that so many of you are ignorant and believe anything the so called elites tell you ..man CANNOT harm the earth to the point they say ..they are LIARS ..their agenda is simple...to take away freedom and quality of life for everyone but themselves ..and i said CO2 not CO ...do some research
DNM35 4 years ago
So that layer of smog that sits over NYC is healthy? CO2, CO is contributing to these same effects on peoples health. Kids have an alarming rate of asthma, and still increasing. These are facts, not lies. Cancer is at an all time high, you think these levels produced from cars is not doing this? Must be fake, hoax, etc. Yea, sure. Its all a lie.
sirHOAX 4 years ago
What you see are sulfides. Either way sirhoax is right. Cancer is off the charts and there was almost no cancer many years ago and there is almost no cancer in cultures that have no industry. Using wood/syn/producer gas is not a bad idea. No chemical additives, co neutral. BTW, speaking of cancer, have you heard what they add to jet fuel now?
cheaphardwarez 4 years ago
Heja heja! Fantastic how far does your car go on a standard log? :-P
No, I seriously think it is really good what you've done there.
kode1303 4 years ago
Thanks! It uses 10 litres of wood / 10 km.
vedbil 4 years ago
10 litres of wood 10km!pretty good!whats the vehicle weight?
tomterahedrob 3 years ago
Explain to me again how this is environmentally responsible.
zapwatt 4 years ago
Since the car runs on renewable fuel - wood - No fossil fuels are used to fuel the car.
So it does not add extra CO2 into the atmosphere, it does not contribute to the greenhouse effect.
roidroid 4 years ago
My Corvette is much faster than that Volvo; I mean it wood be no contest if we race. Good try though!
kennethj1956 4 years ago
Does your Corvette run on wood? 'Cause that's what this film is about, not speed, hp and torque.
rourin 4 years ago
Nice work! In the early 80's I made a gasifier for my IHC truck and drove about 2400 miles on wood.
jimmeyroad 4 years ago
That sounds really nice! Do you have a picture of the truck and gassifier?
vedbil 4 years ago