fuck cod fanboys who said that the m14 isnt fully auto like my stupid friend who said that the m14 was a ww2 gun that was a single shot and had no recoil at all XD
Correct me if I'm wrong but this is an m14a1 with the pistol grip vertical grip and heavier barrel. They added these features to make full auto fire more controllable
i'm looking at these comments and see alot of people don't know what they are talking about, i know it's History and just so no-one gets confused. the m14 can't be used as a LMG. there was a Version of it that was Tested as a how he put it a "LMG" but there were critical problems with it and it went no-where.
@appa609 You can't see what he's shooting at though. In official army reports they even said the M14 had poor full auto performance, so I'll go by them.
@esh325 The weapon wasnt meant to be fired at the rate that was in this video. Its gas operated which cuts down on the recoil and if you fire 3 to 5 round burst like your supose to there is no way anyone can truthfuly say that. You couldnt spray and pray with it because of its size, you could with the M16 but the M16 doesnt have the stoping power especialy at 200 out. If your in the bush theres nothing to compare. Ammo wt. did it in ,not the weapon. 65 "66 67" 68 69 USMC
i didnt know it could go Full-Auto!!! from what ive read on wikipedia it said that it was just a improved version of the M1 Garand so i thought it was semi! but i saw that it said it had absurd recoil during full auto so i was like whaaatt? so i looked it up on youtube cause it has everything and this came up nice video
I looked at the specs for the AK and M-14 and (on paper) the M-14 is just as good if not better then the AK in range, Rate of fire, accuracy, etc. The only place the AK is better is in amount of ammo.
@BRIANROX1 The M14 has far better range. The M14 fires a 7.62x51, which flies a lot faster and has superior ballistics then to the AK's 7.62x39. Then again, the extra range is not needed of the M14 for regular combat engagements, as most are 300m's or less. The M14 is more suitable as a DM rifle then an infantry rifle imo. The M14 has a slightly higher rate of fire then the M14, but it doesn't matter as it has poor full auto performance.
@zerocker45 1 We did, between 1950 and 1964/65. The M16 replaced it as the primary assult rifle because it was lighter and each indivisual soldier could carry more ammunintion. the M14 is still being used for marksmen and snipers.
@gooyzit I know i meant to still use it as our main assault rifle cause it is a super powerfull rifle.. I would rather use this in a jungle against vietnames than the M16... I bet that when our soldiers M16 broke in the middle of a firefight they wish they were using an M14 instead....
@TroopperFoFo Actually the M-14 is a Garand with a detachable magazine, shorter round, select fire and an enhanced gas system. The Garand had the en-bloc clip.
@Marine17inlove Well, I HAVE a real M14, selector switch and all. Yes, it IS legally ownable, at least here in WI. I don't fire it too often, don't want it to wear out and don't wanna attract too much attention.
@FIFA07Addicted Soviet weapons are still made of cheap, shitty parts. The M14 is, by military definition, an assault rifle, even though it fires the big boy round, and it was carefully designed and all parts cut and machined to precision. Look at the action of a '47, and you'll notice that there's a lot of free play between parts.
Oh and since when do 'spray-n-pray' and 'accuracy' go together?
Also, 7.62x54R isn't necessarily more powerful than the N.A.T.O. round.
@kuhn19 I've fired an M14, a regular rifle style stock M14, in fully automatic. All you gotta do was had your arm 90 degree, or perpendicular, off your hip, and bay all cost, ALL COST, try and pull the barrel downward. Fire the weapon in short burst did hep the accuracy, combines with a short accurate spray of 3, 4, maybe 5 rounds is enough to punch through almost anything.
@FIFA07Addicted It IS true. ALL AKs from ALL eras are still made out of shitty, cheap, stamped steel parts. Sure, they're tough and reliable, but I thought you and I had already established that? And there is no underrating a '47's accuracy, because it just ISN'T THERE!!! And incredibly powerfull??? You'd better study up on ballistics before you come and say something like that, because 7.62x39mm doesn't compare to 7.62x51mm N.A.T.O. Get your facts straight, then come talk to me.
@kuhn19 lol once again you´re wrong. the M14 cant be compared with an AK47 like I said in my post, and the rounds they fire cant be compared aswell. the M14 is an Automatic Rifle used for precision, and sniping many times. assault rifles are supposed to spray and still have a bit of accuracy. the M16 is the weapon you have to compare to the AK. and the M14 with the Dragunov. which has a more powerful round, 7.62x54. and the AK rounds are more powerful than M16s. in terms of power soviet guns own
@kuhn19 of course than you can argue that the dragunov M14 comparison isnt fair, because the dragunov coudlnt be fired automatically, but the "regular" version of the M14 is usually fired in semi-automatic mode, as it is more accurate that way.
@FIFA07Addicted You're displaying a Soviet Sickle and Hammer. That tell me all I need to know about YOU.
If you wanna start throwing political names around, that's fine by me, Commie.
And that was Vietnam. 40-some years ago. AKs might be tough, but that's all they really have, there's no quality to them. American weapons all the way. I'll outshoot you with my own M14 against your shitty AK rifles any day.
@Marine17inlove like you did in vietnam? oh yeah you crapped your pants and ran away thats right. and never had the balls to attack the soviets, pussies.
@Marine17inlove I meant the USA as whole, not you personally. and the marines are soldiers like any others in the US. you obey orders from above, and you get brainwashed to think that a communist is some sort of psychopatical anti-christ.
@FIFA07Addicted We do not hate russian, we do not hate any of the North or South Vietnamese. But indeed I do hate communist. I am a Saigon born south Vietnamese. And I DO live in Vietnam. And I will tell you something : Communist was really a son of a bitch.
But I also gonna tell ya something, if that Lyndon B Johnson-of-a-bitch didn't send us Marines to 'Nam like that, there wouldn't be a war going on, and by that, the NVA could have come & start a war, & we would just have to keep peace.
@FIFA07Addicted We were Marines, assholes. And we fight wars with guns and munitions. We don't fight for seats. We don't fight for tickets. And yet we ain't no general asshole who work for goddamn politicians.
@kuhn19 lol no just no, you know thats not true. and both cold war era and modern AK´s are quality, they´re reliable, tough and incredibly powerful. and their accuracy is underrated. no M14 can compete with an AK as an assault rifle. the M16 can.
I have always read that the M-14 was uncontrollable under full-auto fire, but doesn't seem to be the case here....and I would think a compensator would help keep muzzle rise down....I got to shoot a buddy's M-1 in .308.... a big, clunky rifle....
@kuhn19 ahahaha dont make me laugh retard the AK is better than any american rifle. no wonder why the americans always grabbed AK47s in vietnam whenever they could. but you´re a republican so I wont ask much from your intellect.
@FIFA07Addicted Go act like a douche elsewhere. Nobody cares about your crappy AK-47. If you had approached it differently instead of acting like an asshole I'm sure you would have gotten different responses from everyone.
I don't see how an M-14 ( EBR/ whatever ) could be heavier than an M-16 variant with a 203 stuck on it or how the M-14 variant could be any heavier than a 240 etc. I was expecting way more muzzle climb in the video. I wonder how many surplus M-14s or taking up space in government armories. Considering their shortlived service life several of them are most likely in better shape than the majority of issued M16 variants. At least they had enough sense to field some of them.
@oeyesea If I am not mistaken, some m14s were sold off to police depts in the 60s after the adoption of the m16. Some remaining in govt stock were destroyed in the 70s, and the Clinton administration sold/gave away some more to the Croatians and the Haitians in the 90s. I guess there are still enough around to rearsenal and press into service, plus I imagine that some are being manufactured again for the Govt or perhaps just the parts.
@Anthrax92007 Not to be a Smart ass but it was "officially" designated M14A1 in 1966. M14E2 was its experimental designation in 1963. That's what the E stands for ;-)
ok I was really confused for a second.. after a quick search I'm guessing this is an M14A1 (the pistol grip really threw me off.. I almost thought it was a BAR for a second)
@afroman452 While it depends on the gun, you need generally need different, bolts, trigger/selector groups, auto-seers, and firing pins, as well as whatever other odd parts particular guns may need. A spring doesn't do anything except return the bolt to it's rest position. Swapping it out would only change the speed at which the bolt moves during a single cycle, but it can't make a gun fire full-auto.
@mobius1aic True but man they still like to climb because of the stock design. I see your point though it does add a bit more control. Check out the JAE-100 stock. Awsome but they want a paycheck for it. Its the cure for many of this rifles problems.
The stock is an original USGI E2 stock. It was issued with the rifles that remained full-auto. Check out my other videos at azskidotcom here on Youtube. Bill (The shooter in this video) I have one that shows me shootng the same weapon with the standard USGI stock. I wish I had kept that weapon! I sold it a while back along with all my other company full-auto weapons when I closed my FFL/SOT shop.
@LOLNOOBCAKES A couple reasons actually, ones the weight, the M14 is about 4 pounds heavier unloaded, .308s are twice the price of .223s...and theres something else about field stripping but I'm not sure
I've never seen or heard of jams with proper cleaning...but places like Iraq or anywhere with alot of sand generally I'd say it might be likely. Dunno, I've personally never seen a comparison between the two according to failure rates
@DodgeViperACRX well its a pretty long gun not really for CQB, but i totally agree with you if they use the gun mainly for field. its so accurate and it uses a big ass round
@devildiver6411 m16 is a long rifle, thats why only the marines use it now. everyone else uses the m4, but the m16 is better than the m4, and the M14 is better than the m16
@DodgeViperACRX How so with a person's skill any gun can just be as good.All guns have their flaws is just all im saying and its just up to the owner on how to use it, where to use it, and when to use it.All guns break, rust, and jam without cleaning it either way im pretty sure almost all guns are on the same level depending on what class like a rifle or carbine or pistol.
@DodgeViperACRX so ur saying the m14 that weighs more, has more expensive ammo, less reliable, and an old design should be our rifle still? the m16 loaded weighs around 8 pounds while the m14 weighs about 15 pounds loaded because of the wooden body and the heavy cast barrel. m16 is shorter and has a faster ROF.
I don't buy this "which one is better" fanboy crap.
They are different weapons for different purposes.
The M-14 is essentially a specialist weapons platform where as the M-16 platform is so universally adaptable there are variations for every need (usually passable performance as DM, LMG)
The M-14 is really only viable as a DM or LMG, the M-16 fills the middle ground of what the M-14 can't do. They are both excellent weapons, just different.
@PrepSurvivor It strikes me that the effective range and penetration power of the M14 is superior to M16.
M14 would be particularly better suited to desert warfare, in the bald open topography in Central Asia, or in the long range 3 dimensional gun battles from city high rises down to street level.
M16 variants ought to be the odd man out specialty weapon, for close contact assaults.
such an amasing and unique weapon. totaly better than the ebr inmy opinion. but everyone likes different styles of guns and it realy depends on whos using it i guess lol
Look how much the operatpr benefits from a forward grip. Assuming that is firing the 7.62 round, there is very little recoil when compared to the original M14. Could have had a greater service length if they came with one originally
LOVE the M14. I don't care too much for the AR-10 or AR-15 variants, though I like the 416 and 417, but the classic rifles are the best. M1918, Garand, M14...
What was he even talking about?
BigZurfer 2 weeks ago
fuck cod fanboys who said that the m14 isnt fully auto like my stupid friend who said that the m14 was a ww2 gun that was a single shot and had no recoil at all XD
lol999999ful 3 weeks ago
@lol999999ful Dude, your friend is a fucking retard for saying something like that.
WASPfreak 3 days ago
@WASPfreak i know right XD
HoneyBadger1337 2 days ago
.308 recoil ain't that bad guys, even with a short barrel. That foregrip is keeping his muzzle down too.
Shoot my old German Mauser or my lever-action .45-70 and tell me that the .308 hurts your shoulder....
HptmSteinhauer 3 weeks ago
Correct me if I'm wrong but this is an m14a1 with the pistol grip vertical grip and heavier barrel. They added these features to make full auto fire more controllable
nlevine1988 1 month ago
now only if they had fully atuo m14s in world war II
JDMowerGuy1998 2 months ago
two things can really aid controlling automatic fire on anyweapon:
1. proper firing technique and stance
2. a vertical foregrip, it's not even funny how much of a difference and FVG makes
maxrocks19 5 months ago
No Cod nerds saying m14 isn't selective fire? YAY!!! ^_^
Mrboombastic266 5 months ago 2
i'm looking at these comments and see alot of people don't know what they are talking about, i know it's History and just so no-one gets confused. the m14 can't be used as a LMG. there was a Version of it that was Tested as a how he put it a "LMG" but there were critical problems with it and it went no-where.
codycody44 5 months ago
@codycody44
An M14 sounds like a terrible base for an LMG.
0neDoomedSpaceMarine 3 months ago
This just proves the soldiers who reported the M-14 was uncontrollable on full auto were pussies.
appa609 5 months ago
@appa609 You can't see what he's shooting at though. In official army reports they even said the M14 had poor full auto performance, so I'll go by them.
esh325 5 months ago
@esh325 The weapon wasnt meant to be fired at the rate that was in this video. Its gas operated which cuts down on the recoil and if you fire 3 to 5 round burst like your supose to there is no way anyone can truthfuly say that. You couldnt spray and pray with it because of its size, you could with the M16 but the M16 doesnt have the stoping power especialy at 200 out. If your in the bush theres nothing to compare. Ammo wt. did it in ,not the weapon. 65 "66 67" 68 69 USMC
215jami 3 months ago
@215jami 100% correct. .223 was much friendlier to airlift than .308.
johntvette 2 months ago
@appa609 It takes a lot of excess concentration and control to fire it on full auto.
johntvette 2 months ago
Hot damn. You man-handled that like a champ.
hacker7305 6 months ago
Cawadooty fans just learned something today
tenklop 6 months ago
i didnt know it could go Full-Auto!!! from what ive read on wikipedia it said that it was just a improved version of the M1 Garand so i thought it was semi! but i saw that it said it had absurd recoil during full auto so i was like whaaatt? so i looked it up on youtube cause it has everything and this came up nice video
laughy38247357075834 7 months ago
I looked at the specs for the AK and M-14 and (on paper) the M-14 is just as good if not better then the AK in range, Rate of fire, accuracy, etc. The only place the AK is better is in amount of ammo.
BRIANROX1 7 months ago
@BRIANROX1 Just get a 100 round mag for the M-14 and you'll have plenty of ammo. You can also mount a grip to improve stability.
Quintapus 6 months ago
@BRIANROX1 The M14 has far better range. The M14 fires a 7.62x51, which flies a lot faster and has superior ballistics then to the AK's 7.62x39. Then again, the extra range is not needed of the M14 for regular combat engagements, as most are 300m's or less. The M14 is more suitable as a DM rifle then an infantry rifle imo. The M14 has a slightly higher rate of fire then the M14, but it doesn't matter as it has poor full auto performance.
esh325 6 months ago
Dang took the recoil like a champ
DjNurSpek 7 months ago
for those who think its something different from other m14s its not m14s are full auto and semi
VFXGroup 8 months ago
Jesus, this guy ran a freakin' M14 like it's a .22...
globalforce 8 months ago 6
was that the 308
guitarplayer11234 8 months ago
To any of those pussies who say the m-14 has to much recoil, watch this video.
a2redneck 8 months ago
@a2redneck 308 kicks like a mule man go fire one
larkin540 7 months ago
@larkin540 i know i did, but ya get used to it after a while.
a2redneck 7 months ago
I would't been a bad idea to use this in our armed forces...
zerocker45 8 months ago
@zerocker45 1 We did, between 1950 and 1964/65. The M16 replaced it as the primary assult rifle because it was lighter and each indivisual soldier could carry more ammunintion. the M14 is still being used for marksmen and snipers.
gooyzit 8 months ago
@gooyzit I know i meant to still use it as our main assault rifle cause it is a super powerfull rifle.. I would rather use this in a jungle against vietnames than the M16... I bet that when our soldiers M16 broke in the middle of a firefight they wish they were using an M14 instead....
zerocker45 8 months ago
they shoulda had this atachment in blackops
jonahsa2000 8 months ago
If im not mistaking thats the m14a1 am I correct?
MrSilver497 9 months ago
@MrSilver497 yes, thats right
GunMaker91 9 months ago
@GunMaker91 other than the bipod in the back what else is different from the other m14 model.
MrSilver497 9 months ago
@MrSilver497 the differentce is that the a1 gots a pistol grip, the m14 is gripstocked
GunMaker91 9 months ago
Makes the ak47 look like a piece of shit
4570dylan 9 months ago 15
@4570dylan no it makes the m16 piece of shit
MrGlock4me 3 months ago 2
m-14 m1 Garand with a clip and fully auto option =)
TroopperFoFo 9 months ago
@TroopperFoFo Actually the M-14 is a Garand with a detachable magazine, shorter round, select fire and an enhanced gas system. The Garand had the en-bloc clip.
the308capital 9 months ago
@360jarhead
M16s weren't made for combat. They were made for Air Force Personnel. Not your best choice in battle.
(Soldiers use M4A1s now)
UmbraMooh 9 months ago
@UmbraMooh No, the air force just happened to invest in them first, silly.
p79wub 9 months ago
got to be a shock the first time
TheAlexagius 10 months ago
เจ๋งงงงงง
BiyAza 10 months ago
amazing !!!! one of the best rifle ever
99STRUCKL99 10 months ago
Props to that guy for not going anti-air with the M14. That rifle is monster of a weapon.
notagoodsitrep 10 months ago
wow you handled the recoil fine! respect xD
MrManson94 11 months ago
this is how a porno is started lol
TheSuperpaco2 11 months ago 2
That's MY Rifle!
M1A heavy-barrel in an E2 McMillan
Blago6actual 11 months ago
Beautiful wepon!
VitaminE6SS 1 year ago
@Marine17inlove Well, I HAVE a real M14, selector switch and all. Yes, it IS legally ownable, at least here in WI. I don't fire it too often, don't want it to wear out and don't wanna attract too much attention.
kuhn19 1 year ago
@FIFA07Addicted Soviet weapons are still made of cheap, shitty parts. The M14 is, by military definition, an assault rifle, even though it fires the big boy round, and it was carefully designed and all parts cut and machined to precision. Look at the action of a '47, and you'll notice that there's a lot of free play between parts.
Oh and since when do 'spray-n-pray' and 'accuracy' go together?
Also, 7.62x54R isn't necessarily more powerful than the N.A.T.O. round.
kuhn19 1 year ago
@kuhn19 I've fired an M14, a regular rifle style stock M14, in fully automatic. All you gotta do was had your arm 90 degree, or perpendicular, off your hip, and bay all cost, ALL COST, try and pull the barrel downward. Fire the weapon in short burst did hep the accuracy, combines with a short accurate spray of 3, 4, maybe 5 rounds is enough to punch through almost anything.
Marine17inlove 1 year ago
@FIFA07Addicted It IS true. ALL AKs from ALL eras are still made out of shitty, cheap, stamped steel parts. Sure, they're tough and reliable, but I thought you and I had already established that? And there is no underrating a '47's accuracy, because it just ISN'T THERE!!! And incredibly powerfull??? You'd better study up on ballistics before you come and say something like that, because 7.62x39mm doesn't compare to 7.62x51mm N.A.T.O. Get your facts straight, then come talk to me.
kuhn19 1 year ago
@kuhn19 lol once again you´re wrong. the M14 cant be compared with an AK47 like I said in my post, and the rounds they fire cant be compared aswell. the M14 is an Automatic Rifle used for precision, and sniping many times. assault rifles are supposed to spray and still have a bit of accuracy. the M16 is the weapon you have to compare to the AK. and the M14 with the Dragunov. which has a more powerful round, 7.62x54. and the AK rounds are more powerful than M16s. in terms of power soviet guns own
FIFA07Addicted 1 year ago
@kuhn19 of course than you can argue that the dragunov M14 comparison isnt fair, because the dragunov coudlnt be fired automatically, but the "regular" version of the M14 is usually fired in semi-automatic mode, as it is more accurate that way.
FIFA07Addicted 1 year ago
@FIFA07Addicted A regular M14 was selector firing, whereas a civvies model fires semi only.
Marine17inlove 1 year ago
Less recoil than the rifle stock version.
Marine17inlove 1 year ago
@FIFA07Addicted You're displaying a Soviet Sickle and Hammer. That tell me all I need to know about YOU.
If you wanna start throwing political names around, that's fine by me, Commie.
And that was Vietnam. 40-some years ago. AKs might be tough, but that's all they really have, there's no quality to them. American weapons all the way. I'll outshoot you with my own M14 against your shitty AK rifles any day.
kuhn19 1 year ago
@kuhn19 Come on man, we don't speak languages with those communist piece of shits. We speak with 'em by leads and flat polymer.
Marine17inlove 1 year ago
@Marine17inlove like you did in vietnam? oh yeah you crapped your pants and ran away thats right. and never had the balls to attack the soviets, pussies.
FIFA07Addicted 1 year ago
@FIFA07Addicted Oh, really, we were the only unit that survive the war almost being without a cut, asshole. Fuck off communist piece of shit.
Marine17inlove 1 year ago
@Marine17inlove I meant the USA as whole, not you personally. and the marines are soldiers like any others in the US. you obey orders from above, and you get brainwashed to think that a communist is some sort of psychopatical anti-christ.
FIFA07Addicted 1 year ago
@FIFA07Addicted We do not hate russian, we do not hate any of the North or South Vietnamese. But indeed I do hate communist. I am a Saigon born south Vietnamese. And I DO live in Vietnam. And I will tell you something : Communist was really a son of a bitch.
But I also gonna tell ya something, if that Lyndon B Johnson-of-a-bitch didn't send us Marines to 'Nam like that, there wouldn't be a war going on, and by that, the NVA could have come & start a war, & we would just have to keep peace.
Marine17inlove 1 year ago
@FIFA07Addicted We were Marines, assholes. And we fight wars with guns and munitions. We don't fight for seats. We don't fight for tickets. And yet we ain't no general asshole who work for goddamn politicians.
Marine17inlove 1 year ago
@kuhn19 lol no just no, you know thats not true. and both cold war era and modern AK´s are quality, they´re reliable, tough and incredibly powerful. and their accuracy is underrated. no M14 can compete with an AK as an assault rifle. the M16 can.
FIFA07Addicted 1 year ago
I have always read that the M-14 was uncontrollable under full-auto fire, but doesn't seem to be the case here....and I would think a compensator would help keep muzzle rise down....I got to shoot a buddy's M-1 in .308.... a big, clunky rifle....
xzqzq 1 year ago
wow that recoil looks totally controllable
HARVSTO 1 year ago
pistol grips look gay on the M14
jwat072 1 year ago
@jwat072 guns arent all about looks... and dont call things gay unless you see two guys sucking eachothers dicks... if not it makes no sense :D
a7xfanboylolololol 8 months ago 2
Dear Santa........
zline18 1 year ago
i thinks ita bm59
jam9297 1 year ago
I DON'T WANT NO TEENAGE QUEEN, I JUST WANT MY EM FOURTEEN
capnhands 1 year ago 41
@skaterofcb It's not MY fault that commie rifles suck.
kuhn19 1 year ago
@kuhn19 ahahaha dont make me laugh retard the AK is better than any american rifle. no wonder why the americans always grabbed AK47s in vietnam whenever they could. but you´re a republican so I wont ask much from your intellect.
FIFA07Addicted 1 year ago
@FIFA07Addicted Go act like a douche elsewhere. Nobody cares about your crappy AK-47. If you had approached it differently instead of acting like an asshole I'm sure you would have gotten different responses from everyone.
thing503 1 year ago
I want that rifle. How did you aquire this?
elithebrute 1 year ago
OO HOO
doente5 1 year ago
11 AK-47s didn't like being out-performed by the M14. :)
kuhn19 1 year ago 3
@kuhn19 just stop
skaterofcb 1 year ago
nothin like a hill billy
SuperCrazyJunk 1 year ago
wow modded controller
ghostavenger1988 1 year ago
@ghostavenger1988 wow, video game reference. cant watch real vids without at least 1
sweetswantonbombs 1 year ago
$10 worth of ammo in a couple seconds!
:)
CanadianReich 1 year ago
@CanadianReich Hey. Still ten big ones well spent.
RRVCrinale 1 year ago
I don't see how an M-14 ( EBR/ whatever ) could be heavier than an M-16 variant with a 203 stuck on it or how the M-14 variant could be any heavier than a 240 etc. I was expecting way more muzzle climb in the video. I wonder how many surplus M-14s or taking up space in government armories. Considering their shortlived service life several of them are most likely in better shape than the majority of issued M16 variants. At least they had enough sense to field some of them.
oeyesea 1 year ago
@oeyesea If I am not mistaken, some m14s were sold off to police depts in the 60s after the adoption of the m16. Some remaining in govt stock were destroyed in the 70s, and the Clinton administration sold/gave away some more to the Croatians and the Haitians in the 90s. I guess there are still enough around to rearsenal and press into service, plus I imagine that some are being manufactured again for the Govt or perhaps just the parts.
GirlsGamesGunsGuitar 1 year ago
I want one!!
First semi-auto rifle im gonna get is a M-14.
The1FastGP 1 year ago
@The1FastGP You are only gonna get a semi auto rifle
thskater 1 year ago
@thskater Fine with me, i love this rifle.
The1FastGP 1 year ago
what states can you have fully automatic weapons
KoTORfAN3 1 year ago
@KoTORfAN3 i think texas is the only state
bigpig1900 1 year ago
@bigpig1900 I thought new mexico and nevada could too? i might be wrong though
cevune 1 year ago
sure that isn't airsoft......
tudilautaru 1 year ago
the only thing m16 has over m14 is m16 is a lot easier to clean if you ask me
dumfart21 1 year ago
Thats a M-14E2 the Light machine gun variant of the m-14
Anthrax92007 1 year ago 29
@Anthrax92007 how do you know its just not a full auto m14 with a different stock?
1airplane21 1 year ago
@1airplane21
I don't. But, it has the correct stock, bipod, vertical grip and flash hider, so I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that it is.
Anthrax92007 1 year ago
@Anthrax92007 the stock could also be a dmr stock
1airplane21 1 year ago
@Anthrax92007 Not to be a Smart ass but it was "officially" designated M14A1 in 1966. M14E2 was its experimental designation in 1963. That's what the E stands for ;-)
murpheysmuskets 1 year ago
I'd like to know were he got that Beauty...It is gorgeous
murpheysmuskets 1 year ago
@Anthrax92007 thats why it has the pistol grip
00machinima 10 months ago
ok I was really confused for a second.. after a quick search I'm guessing this is an M14A1 (the pistol grip really threw me off.. I almost thought it was a BAR for a second)
DaFlyinSkwirl 1 year ago
@DaFlyinSkwirl How did you confuse with BAR? The BAR doesn't have a pistol grip either.
csmybuttt 1 year ago
wow...is this a DMR? I noticed not a bad recoil to it.
ybrik5 1 year ago
recoil control!!!
DenKulesteSomFins 1 year ago
@isajeep is that a lmg stock?
SuperNoob200 1 year ago
in the 60's, I had a toy one of these. operated on batteries. what's the deal with the handle this guy is using?
rocksmeller99 1 year ago
Drool....
illsignificunt 1 year ago
Now that, is a proper gun with a proper calibre!
7.62 beats 5.56 by a long shot!
BOT101st 1 year ago
i think you can convert most semi auto fire arms to fully automatic. but its about the sear release i think not the spring.
boobsmaster 1 year ago
@boobsmaster the M14 is an Automatic firearm to begin with anyway...
BARRACULA94 1 year ago
@BARRACULA94 not all of them! it could be said that the semi auto one is just an M1A but still.
boobsmaster 1 year ago
nice control of that weapon
international1256 1 year ago
OOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHH. That makes a nice sound.
FunVanDriver 1 year ago
Gssssss Gorgeousssssssss...
CazHattrick11 1 year ago
Explain how i'm wrong
afroman452 1 year ago
@afroman452 While it depends on the gun, you need generally need different, bolts, trigger/selector groups, auto-seers, and firing pins, as well as whatever other odd parts particular guns may need. A spring doesn't do anything except return the bolt to it's rest position. Swapping it out would only change the speed at which the bolt moves during a single cycle, but it can't make a gun fire full-auto.
ch0k1ngh4z4rd 1 year ago
dude you can convert any gun to full auto all you do is take out a certain spring
afroman452 1 year ago
@afroman452 you really no nothing about guns do you?
armypenguin 1 year ago
fag u have a modded controller...=D
Stomp204 1 year ago
Cool!
ROUGEBLOCK 1 year ago
I wonder if you can convert a M14 semi into auto? hmmm Well, I guess, If not, Ill just pull the trigger really fast....right? lol
somedirtyangel 1 year ago
@somedirtyangel A full auto conversion? Physically, yes if you know what you're doing and can get your hands on the parts. Legally, no.
csmybuttt 1 year ago
@somedirtyangel or bump fire
armypenguin 1 year ago
It's like BAR :D
Estonianboy123 1 year ago
@Estonianboy123 other than a bar is 7.62x54 or 30-06 well this is 7.62x51 or .308
armypenguin 1 year ago
@armypenguin Ok smartass, but apparance of BAR is very similar of this rifle
Estonianboy123 1 year ago
@Estonianboy123 I don't think so.
Thebestever441 1 year ago
I loved my m14 both in "tha stan and raq".Mine was a semi that was fine m4/16's are pee shooters.
mullyscans 1 year ago
How are you keeping muzzle rise down. I have an M1A and it really like to climb in Semi-Auto.
DobermansRock 1 year ago
@DobermansRock There is a front grip.
mobius1aic 1 year ago
@mobius1aic True but man they still like to climb because of the stock design. I see your point though it does add a bit more control. Check out the JAE-100 stock. Awsome but they want a paycheck for it. Its the cure for many of this rifles problems.
DobermansRock 1 year ago
thats a beautiful sound
octaviom85 1 year ago
the beginning sounds like Lt. Kerrigan from starcraft
pze94 1 year ago
@pze94 ahaha ur right man lol
HuntingAwaller 1 year ago
The stock is an original USGI E2 stock. It was issued with the rifles that remained full-auto. Check out my other videos at azskidotcom here on Youtube. Bill (The shooter in this video) I have one that shows me shootng the same weapon with the standard USGI stock. I wish I had kept that weapon! I sold it a while back along with all my other company full-auto weapons when I closed my FFL/SOT shop.
azskidotcom 1 year ago
too bad the military uses the m-16 more,this gun would save more lives
MrBubzLover 1 year ago
Makes you ask why the M14 got replaced by the M16.
LOLNOOBCAKES 1 year ago
@LOLNOOBCAKES A couple reasons actually, ones the weight, the M14 is about 4 pounds heavier unloaded, .308s are twice the price of .223s...and theres something else about field stripping but I'm not sure
R5H4D0W 1 year ago
@R5H4D0W Yea I know, even though the M16 is lighter, it jammed more and the soldiers wern't used to it as much as the m14. Tell me if, I'm wrong.
LOLNOOBCAKES 1 year ago
@LOLNOOBCAKES M16s jamming is news to me :)
I've never seen or heard of jams with proper cleaning...but places like Iraq or anywhere with alot of sand generally I'd say it might be likely. Dunno, I've personally never seen a comparison between the two according to failure rates
R5H4D0W 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Now that's manly
knigthfigth 1 year ago
u.s. army shoulda stuck with this rifle instead of the m16, much better of a gun
DodgeViperACRX 1 year ago 14
@DodgeViperACRX well its a pretty long gun not really for CQB, but i totally agree with you if they use the gun mainly for field. its so accurate and it uses a big ass round
devildiver6411 1 year ago
@devildiver6411 m16 is a long rifle, thats why only the marines use it now. everyone else uses the m4, but the m16 is better than the m4, and the M14 is better than the m16
DodgeViperACRX 1 year ago
@DodgeViperACRX How so with a person's skill any gun can just be as good.All guns have their flaws is just all im saying and its just up to the owner on how to use it, where to use it, and when to use it.All guns break, rust, and jam without cleaning it either way im pretty sure almost all guns are on the same level depending on what class like a rifle or carbine or pistol.
DroPShoTShArPShOoTeR 1 year ago
@DodgeViperACRX i dunno. its too overpowered and heavy to be a standard weapon, but it should have been retained a little more than it is now.
bigredonedday 1 year ago
@DodgeViperACRX is better ,but is also heavyer and longer than the m16,and the ammo too ..is heavy,it's a awsome weapon but not for an entire army...
tudilautaru 1 year ago
@DodgeViperACRX if only it were that simple
riseld4 1 year ago
@DodgeViperACRX so ur saying the m14 that weighs more, has more expensive ammo, less reliable, and an old design should be our rifle still? the m16 loaded weighs around 8 pounds while the m14 weighs about 15 pounds loaded because of the wooden body and the heavy cast barrel. m16 is shorter and has a faster ROF.
sweetswantonbombs 1 year ago
@sweetswantonbombs
Less Reliable?
Don't think so.
I don't buy this "which one is better" fanboy crap.
They are different weapons for different purposes.
The M-14 is essentially a specialist weapons platform where as the M-16 platform is so universally adaptable there are variations for every need (usually passable performance as DM, LMG)
The M-14 is really only viable as a DM or LMG, the M-16 fills the middle ground of what the M-14 can't do. They are both excellent weapons, just different.
PrepSurvivor 1 year ago 50
@PrepSurvivor Direct impingement is still crap.
baronofcheese 10 months ago
@baronofcheese
Indeed it is.
This is fact.
PrepSurvivor 10 months ago
@PrepSurvivor Well said..
oldawgnewtrikz 9 months ago
@PrepSurvivor At least some one gets it. thank you sir.
TwinklesPussMaster61 8 months ago
@PrepSurvivor hmmm.....
billymayer1000 7 months ago
@PrepSurvivor It strikes me that the effective range and penetration power of the M14 is superior to M16.
M14 would be particularly better suited to desert warfare, in the bald open topography in Central Asia, or in the long range 3 dimensional gun battles from city high rises down to street level.
M16 variants ought to be the odd man out specialty weapon, for close contact assaults.
centurion180ad 7 months ago
@DodgeViperACRX you're right, this a rifle with a bigger round, more acurate and easy to use !!!
pocholin505 1 year ago
such an amasing and unique weapon. totaly better than the ebr inmy opinion. but everyone likes different styles of guns and it realy depends on whos using it i guess lol
blastcampairsofter 1 year ago
Oh shit, Zipperhead with an M14, let's get to running fellas.
luckyCINEMAHD 1 year ago
werent m14 eventually set to single shot due to heavy recoil?
shankapottamas 1 year ago
@shankapottamas
no, but there's a switch for single shot
TheInevitableTaunt 1 year ago
Great shooting! i would probably fail miserably.
Robbaz 1 year ago
Holy Fuck!
shadowsai3 1 year ago
Look how much the operatpr benefits from a forward grip. Assuming that is firing the 7.62 round, there is very little recoil when compared to the original M14. Could have had a greater service length if they came with one originally
keithbontrager 1 year ago
LOVE the M14. I don't care too much for the AR-10 or AR-15 variants, though I like the 416 and 417, but the classic rifles are the best. M1918, Garand, M14...
kazetehskylord 1 year ago
the pistol grip and the fore grip reduced the recoil.
helldude90 1 year ago
i was like holy shit y duznt it have any kick then i realized ti was an E2 stock
pieinaboxproductions 1 year ago
The M-14 is to me the greatest killing tool.
alexanderthewraith 1 year ago
There is no way that thing is shooting rifle rounds. Way too little recoil.
unluky14 1 year ago