thank god the germans back then did not know what they had with the panther. If they put the limited resources they had in improving the Panther instead of develloping the Tiger 1-2 & King tiger. WW2 would have probably lasted a few years longer. The Panther was the best tank of ww2. And the basis of the best battlefield tank today. The Leopard 2. The leopard might not be the most sofisticated tank today. But it beats every tank out there in reliability, battlefield maintanence and operation.
It's really good tanks but I don't like the engine of it. It sounds like some kind of fucking engine you have in a racing car... They should went diesel or a turbine for the Panther
die amys haben bis mitte - ende der 70er jahre, begeistert an der kanonenleistung des panters herumgespielt. weil ihre schrott-panzer-flinten nicht die leistung erbrachten.
ja ja wir deutschen sind schon hunde! nur zuwenige! wir haben schon immer die tollsten sachen gebaut und die welt ins staunen versetzt. zum glück war werner von braun auch deutscher, sonst hätten die amys heute noch keine rakete ins orbit gebracht. :-D
Die Amis hätte nicht nur keine Raketen sondern nocch viel viel weniger...
Sie haben uns Deutschen über 300.000 Patente nach dem Krieg geklaut...ohne den 2ten Weltkrieg wären die Amis noch in der Steinzeit.
zB:
Mikrowelle 1943/1944 von den deutschen erfunden um die Wehrmachtsrtrupp zu versorgen, bloss man hatte festgestellt das das Essen durch Mikrowellenstrahlung schädlich wurde und hat es eingestellt.
Forscht weit, was alles ehmalige deutsche Patente sind.
das mit der mikrowelle stimmt nur zum teil. sie war die ausbeute aus einem ufo, welches 1939 im schwarzwald abgestürzt war und von den nazis gefunden und geborgen wurde. die mikrowelle war dort als strahlenwaffe verbaut. 2 jahre später startete die erste deutsche flugscheibe. angetrieben von einem verbrennungsmotor. die antigravitation funktionierte aber sie wurde mit kleinen triebwerken angetrieben. kurze zeit darauf flog die haunebuh
No they wouldn't have been, at least not Russia. The German "Wehrmacht" was neither equipped nortrained for such a campaign and Hitler wanted to expand quickly and not wait until his troops had the proper training...
@gunner9081 We know but you Americans weren't in sight until 1944. You weren't in Africa with the British, you weren't in Egypt with the British were was your navy in the north Atlantic?
@Master91474 actually the U.S. was in Africa because Patton (a U.S. General) beat Montgomery, and the U.S. practiced landings for Overload in North Africa. You're right though the U.S. Navy was not in the North Atlantic, just U.S. cargo ships transporting goods, ammo, equipment and tanks to England with only 2 to 3 escort destroyers. The U.S. Navy was too busy with the U.S. Marines fighting a Second war in the Pacific. Please at least try to look at some history and dates, you fool
Однозначно, что танк скопирован с Т-34, возможно "Пантера" по некоторым параметрам на определенном отрезке времени и превосходил его, однако последующие разработки советских танкостроителей свели на нет все усилия фашистской Германии, на которых работала вся Европа
Ta saloperie a semé la mort, la terreur et la misère dans toute l'Europe. On vous a foutu dehors et détruit tes "légendes", bon débarras. Merci encore d'être venu et de nous avoir laissé des souvenirs impérissables....
It was one hell of a tall tank. But it's presence was always noted by both German troops and their opposition, alas there were too few to be sufficient in quantity, and as one documentary said, turret rotation speed was fairly slow, for what it had situations of disadvantage..
@SlavaSvarogu "Because of USA inexpert troops, the war in Africa was delayed 2 years"..."Because of the fail of Operation Market Garden, the war in Europe was delayed 1 year"....Need me to go on?
yes, the world-wide know king tiger and the other WW2 german tanks were very powerfull, thats why the alies (USSR and USA) relied on numbers and on ambushes to destroy such an powerfull tanks.
The Leopard series is one of the most sold and reliable tanks in the world so many countries use them today.
Somehow i am feeling sad that we Germans have a lot of trouble with a lot of things but still are able to build top rated war material like tanks, submarines and more at such a high quality...
It seems like the best we can is to build war related material, even after years :/
My brother Markus Bott had been tortured during 5.5 years by the German BND,the former GESTAPO. I recorded more than 100 videotapes which ended up in the legal system. My brother was tortured during 1.5 years despite several legal procedures pending. He was assassinated on July 11th 2009 because of our homepage, linked on my channel, and our book Der Totalitäre Staat. If my homepage disappears,the BND will have assassinated me as well
Thumbs up if you want the BND to stop torturing my parents
Awesome, but at beginning it was called "ein Sorgenkind" from German commander because of its tech problems at its appeareance on front, then resolved.
M Wittmann was a Tiger commander, IIRC, and died in the web of antitank gunfire that were generated by antitank tactics of that day. Flanking fire against enemy tanks is the most efficient way of stopping a tank attack. McNair's TDs were good at that, but the concept was flawed: US strategic goals required offensive action, and thin armor on TDs made them ineffective while attacking.
Too bad for the nazis the Panther got the Hitler-changes-design-last-minute-upgrade-of-armor just before hitting production. After that, the engine, gears and suspension were too weak for it.
@RattytheSecond Panther should look right: it was copied in several important features from T-34. By contrast US tanks had sloped front hull since 1928...
@tropicthunder332 -That is total crap that you are saying the gun was one of the most powerful and The tank had all...armor, speed,agility and german quality...please educate yourself....and sherman is known for selfdestruction-germans called it 'tommy kocher'because it burst into flames after it get hit by a panzer...U.S tanks are inferior to german and russian tanks!word
@TheDARIEN54321 ---the making of Abrams is coordinated with german engineers...It is easy to say we have this ,we have that but when war occurs it's the heart and resolve that make a difference,...
@TheStormtrooper00 Yes, that is why you have the Panther, which could be the worlds best tank because it is pretty much the same next to the Abrams except for a few more peices of technology and a less learning curve.
@TheStormtrooper00 The King tiger cost as much as a US Navy Destroyer, and was much less effective. Germany didn't have that much manufacturing to waste.
@TheStormtrooper00 Abrams also coordinated with British Engineers to add Chobham armor. The Abrams gun was designed by Rhinemetall. The Turbine was US. I think the Wehrmacht had plenty of will and resolve, and still ended up as the 4th best army in Germany in 1945. Strategy counts, as if you attack both neutrals and allies (as German attacked Poland, USSR, and Italy, and declared war on US) you get outnumbered. Tactics count, as the Wehrmacht never had a tactical answer to US TDs.
@DonMeaker ----yes they had too much enemies and few allies...But they have displayed unseen valor and fought until the end...and terror doctrine...they were feared and still is today.the wehrmacht is replaced with Bundeswehr
@TheStormtrooper00 Of course they had allies: Poland was a German ally against Czechoslovakia, until Germany invaded. USSR was German ally against Poland, until Germany invaded. Italy was German ally against France, until Germany abandoned them on the battlefield. No they did not fight to the end, the hard corps Nazis showed cowardice, and escaped down 'rat lines'. The SS veterans meetings were too well attended for the Germans to have fought to the last.
@TheStormtrooper00 Ok you right about durability speed agillity and power BUT its weakness was its INTERNAL design.The rubber of the turret was needed replace oftenly and the electronical firring mechanism was a pain some times! Shermans were tin cans in mass production,T-34's were faster and more manuverable but light.And now in our days Germany prodused THE best tank for combat in mass production the LEOPARD 2.With other words Panther showed germans how to make tanks(through some mistakes)!!!!
oh yeah !, the sherman is the counter of the PanzerIV, wtf are u talking about ?!, i think u everyday u fucking ur self with a nazi dildo !.
i dont know how many stupid are german that a fucking piece of crap of sherman firefly can fuck off to a tiger !, if u not have idea about tanks germans so STFU !.
tu me hagas desde las profundidades de tus sueños, no solo existe el IS y el T-34, existen muchos tanques como el KV, como los SU.
Rusia siempre fue mejor que Alemania, pero los Estadounidenses hacen pensar que los tanques nazis eran los mejores, para que piensen que ganaron a los mejores, pero no fue así.
Un claro el king Tiger, nunca fue destruido, es verdad, pero entraron poco al campo de batalla por no funcionar bien.
You do not know what you are talking about. The 7,5-cm-KwK 42 L/70 of the Panther was even more powerful than that of the Tiger 1 .Power to weight ratio was excellent. 15 HP/1 The M4 does not stood a chance against a Panther in open warfare. Just refer to wikipedia.
The tank has increased by so much that the tank just fall out of the category of medium tanks. He was only 1 ton easier to Joseph Stalin - 2 (iS-2) tank, which had a 122 mm cannon. Armor-piercing shell this gun from a distance of 1500 m was making frontal armor of Panther, so that the bouncing rear sheet. Panther tank had a lot of interesting mechanisms, really modern at that time and instructive today.
How do you raise the center of gravity, reducing the reservation, to increase the visibility of the battlefield and others that can not be attributed to the merits.
Here's the thing. The standard layout of a German tank provided the location of the drive wheels in front. This had its advantages. Gearbox, too, was in the front. But through the whole body of the car held the shaft from the engine to the gearbox. Because of this, the German engineers have housing above. This led to an increase in weight of the machine with all the attendant problems
Doesn't matter which tank was better, Tiger or Panther. The allies ruled the air, and the P-47 and Typhoon were nightmares to the panzers. P-47 and Typhoon had little to fear from the panzers. USAAF and RAF brought the war to Germany long before land forces arrived. Germany's real hope was the Type 21 submarine, which could have blockaded the Atlantic if it had showed up a year earlier, and possibly postponed or prevented the Normandy landing. Tiger tank was a poor use of limited resources.
There is no way that a fleet of submarines , no matter how advanced it was , could stop the Americans and the Royal Navy forceing an invasion . Germany had virtually no surface fleet , and only the Luftwaffe could effectivelly counter the Royal Navy . Only way to defeat the land invasion of Normandy , without air domination, was at the bridgeheads with armoured counterattacks , even tho that too would be vulnerable to the massive firepower of allied ships .
Actually the vehicle at 3:26 is not a command version of the Panther, panzerbefehlswagen Panther actually retained it's main gun.
The vehicle is what the germans call panzerbeobachtungswagen Panther, armoured observation vehicle Panther and it's an artillery observation vehicle with the main gun and ammo removed to make room for stereoscopic range-finder, range-plotting table and other instruments for artillery observation.
Tiger 1 max speed 37-38 km/h while the Panther does 46km/h in the ausf. A and G, earlier version seemed to have an even higher topspeed managing close to 55km/h.
When you have a pain in the ass you just want to act that would remove it. This has become a thorn in the 1941 T-34. Hi Dreachon:). However, your hasty action is not always the best solution. Especially engineered solution, although it may be effective to some degree. This story could not be more suitable for Panther tank. This tank had a gun with a good penetrating armor. Although he had a lot of engineering problems. Some of which have remained unresolved until the end of the war.
@TheStormtrooper00 truth is, most US tanks was destroyed by panther.. US soldiers didn´t see the difference between tiger and a panther. The germans had the most effective crews, best training and was used to fight in 4/1 ratio to their disadvantage
@Asgaardfighter der Tiger ist nicht besser als der Panther, da der Panther schneller und wendiger war, was ihn in der Tat gefährlicher macht. Ich würde eher sagen, dass beide Panzer gleich gut sind, da der Tiger gute Panzerung hat. Zusammen wären se nicht zu verachten.
@Asgaardfighter Der Panther war tatsaechlich dem Tiger ueberlegen. Die 75mm Hochgeschwindigkeitskanone besass mehr Durschlagskraft als die 88er des Tigers und wurde nur von dem 88/L71 Geschuetz des Koenigstigers uebertroffen. Die Panzerung des Panthers war zwar duenner, aber vergleichbar effektiv da sie angewinkelt war.
Da die Panzerung des Tigers nicht angewinkelt, richtete man ihn nicht mit der Front zum Gegner sondern immer mit einer Ecke des Tigers zum Gegner, so konnte man den Nachteil ausgleichen
Aufgrund der schlechteren Kanone und der dickeren Panzerung wurde er auch eher auf dem offenen Schlachtfeld eingesetzt als der Panther
@Asgaardfighter die kanone vom tiger ist aber auch keine anständige panzerkanone
es ist eine modifizierte mehrzweck flugabwehr kanone
die 75mm kanone des panthers ist eine speziell auf panzerbekämpfung entwickelte hochgeschwindigkeitskanone mit hoher reichweite, kadenz und mündungsgeschwindigkeit
die 88er vom tiger hatte zwar eine große reichweite aber nicht die vernichtungskraft einer kwk vom panther
@spyguybuy Panther couldn't shoot on the move (and have a chance of hitting). Neither could Tiger, and both depended on their armor to withstand enemy shots until they could slow, stop, stop rocking, rev their engine to engage their hydraulic turret traverse, then fire. In the ambush, German tanks would run their engines, making them easier to spot.
By contrast, Sherman had stabilized gun, so they could shoot and hit on the move. In Ambush Shermans could traverse off batteries.
@spyguybuy Sorry, only US tanks were stabiliZed in WWII, and those provided to Soviets, French and Brits through Lend Lease. And Panther could turn turret quickly, if the engine was at high revs, meaning in neutral... and not providing motive power. They did have throat mikes which cut down on noise transmitted over the radio.
@spyguybuy Stabilization on M-2, M-3, M-4, M-3 Light, M-5 Light and M-24 was in vertical plane. M-2 was never sent to war (had some odd features like deflector plates, so that when crossing trenches it could fire MGs down into the trench, and sponson machine guns to fire to the sides into a trench line). All the rest went to war, and did very well. Stabilizers don't solve all your problems, but do help you get your first hit a bit sooner. US tactics: advance past enemy tanks for flank shots
@DonMeaker However nearly all documentation I have read refere to the Stabilizers as not really helping in combat. The aim was still handy-capped when moving at full speed or over very rough ground. The prime fact that a Sherman 75 had to close to within 200M to get past the Panthers front armour whereas the Panther's 7.5 cm KwK 42 L/70 was one of the best guns of WW2.
@Skringly The thickness of the Panther (and other tanks) armor was why US tactics emphasized shots from the flank. Segment lengths on the western front were short, so the 500 meter range of stabilized Sherman was normally adequate, or could be made so. The excellence of the Panther gun and sights were degraded by White Phosporous smoke that the Sherman 75mm guns could fire. Panther was an excellent antitank gun, but cost about 4 times as much as the Stu-3, another excellent antitank gun.
@DonMeaker Well the Panther had a larger and better gun than the Stug 3 (I believe that is what you were refering too) and had the added advantage of a turret. I truely think that Panther was as a fighting machine one of the best tanks of WW2. The only thing it lack was the numbers however they made 6000 only 1000 less than they made Panzer 4's. The only thing the Sherman had going was it's numbers and only T-34 challenges the panther for best tank in my mind.
@Skringly The great thing Sherman had going for it was the 75mm gun which had a very good HE round which was effective against cheap antitank guns. That meant Germans couldn't successfully defend with many cheap antitank guns, rather chose to field a few, overpriced antitank guns housed in heavy tanks. Sherman was narrower, so could penetrate towns and forests, and had higher P/W, for more agility, better hill climbing, and greater reliability so after penetrating, could drive on and on
@Skringly Panther had no more armor to shoot through than the Stu-III or Hetzer. Panther copied features from T-34, and those were indeed good features. Its torsion bar suspension added to height and weight. Panther's suspension filled with mud. Its transmission had a life of only 1000 hours, similar to its final drives and engine. Put the three together and you get a reliability of only 333 hours. Because of that, Germans had to deploy by train, limiting where they could attack
@DonMeaker Panther had 80mm of armour like the Stug 3 however it was sloped at a 55 degree angle. This had the effect of almost tripling the protection it provided and even the 85mm of the T-34-85 could not penertrate the Panther's frontal armour. The same suspension allowed the Panther to travel at high speed across very un-even terrain, allowing the tanks to re face their armour in a hurry in the case that they got flanked.
@Skringly The 76mm gun of the M-18 or Sherman, or the 3 inch gun of the M-10 had better armor penetration than the 85mm gun of the T-34/85. To compensate for not having neutral steer US tanks had faster turret traverse than German tanks. Panther was indeed able to move at high speed across rough or soft ground, but it could not shoot on the move. German regulations recognized that, and forbade shooting on the move. US tankers could, and could hit from a 'slow' rather than from a full stop.
@DonMeaker Sherman 76. The M10 was better but the main shortcoming of the M-10'x 3 inch cannon was its APHE round, which was the round most commonly used for engaging tanks. The 3 inch APHE round was based on the naval 3 inch round and had a small charge in the rear of the round which was supposed to explode after penetration of the targeted tank's armor plating. Unfortunately it was discovered that it exploded on impact or shortly thereafter, causing the round not to penetrate.
@Skringly M-10's 3 inch gun and M-18 76mm gun fired the same shell from different casings. Both had 135mm of penetration with High Vel Composite Rigid (RHS @ 30 degrees) at 1000 yards. The M1A1 used in M-18 and M-4 was lighter. It is true that early versions had that problem, but after it was discovered, they made it without the tail charge. both TDs and US tanks shot a lot more HE rounds than AP rounds and TDs in particular would supplement artillery waiting for the Germans armor to show.
@Skringly Panther's 80mm of armor weighed more than Stu III because Panther suspension took up volume behind the armor. That added armor was Hitlers touch, added against the recommendation of military professionals who wanted a mobile attacking tank, not a pillbox with thin sides. With the transmission in the front along with the armor, the Panther was always nose heavy, and so would 'bounce' going over uneven terrain, slowing engagement times.
Comparing german ww2 tanks with the allies tanks is like to compare a piece of gold with a piece of stinky shit. German 1940 tanks are not too far from modern tanks, nazi or comunist, with or vs the german, aryan or jew, you got to admit that the german ww2 tanks kicked ass more than any fucking other tank in that years...
The M4 Sherman wasn't the best tank of WWII, but probably the finest because it could be modified in many ways. How about a M4 Sherman FlameThrower/Calliope/dozer? :D
@PantherDanny na ja --- will ja nicht viel sagen : aber dein deutsch - solltest Du auch erst mal selber verbessern - bevor du dich soweit aus dem fenster lehnst etzend - ??? - heißt -- ätzend stinckt - ??? - heißt --- stinkt nun ja """ legasniker""" :-) oder anal phabet :-) ? oder??? und zudem sagt man - minder -b e - mitteltes --- was auch immer...zb. stück und gegen den wind - nicht dem so - und nun können wir alle lachen - und machen jetzt einen deutschkurs ok???
Slide shows still are not, and still have never been videos.
BunrakukenIII 3 weeks ago
thank god the germans back then did not know what they had with the panther. If they put the limited resources they had in improving the Panther instead of develloping the Tiger 1-2 & King tiger. WW2 would have probably lasted a few years longer. The Panther was the best tank of ww2. And the basis of the best battlefield tank today. The Leopard 2. The leopard might not be the most sofisticated tank today. But it beats every tank out there in reliability, battlefield maintanence and operation.
gilibran 1 month ago
It's really good tanks but I don't like the engine of it. It sounds like some kind of fucking engine you have in a racing car... They should went diesel or a turbine for the Panther
SMGJohn 1 month ago
die amys haben bis mitte - ende der 70er jahre, begeistert an der kanonenleistung des panters herumgespielt. weil ihre schrott-panzer-flinten nicht die leistung erbrachten.
naabtalschmied 1 month ago 5
ja ja wir deutschen sind schon hunde! nur zuwenige! wir haben schon immer die tollsten sachen gebaut und die welt ins staunen versetzt. zum glück war werner von braun auch deutscher, sonst hätten die amys heute noch keine rakete ins orbit gebracht. :-D
naabtalschmied 2 months ago 4
@naabtalschmied
Die Amis hätte nicht nur keine Raketen sondern nocch viel viel weniger...
Sie haben uns Deutschen über 300.000 Patente nach dem Krieg geklaut...ohne den 2ten Weltkrieg wären die Amis noch in der Steinzeit.
zB:
Mikrowelle 1943/1944 von den deutschen erfunden um die Wehrmachtsrtrupp zu versorgen, bloss man hatte festgestellt das das Essen durch Mikrowellenstrahlung schädlich wurde und hat es eingestellt.
Forscht weit, was alles ehmalige deutsche Patente sind.
Grabgrub73 1 month ago 2
@Grabgrub73
das mit der mikrowelle stimmt nur zum teil. sie war die ausbeute aus einem ufo, welches 1939 im schwarzwald abgestürzt war und von den nazis gefunden und geborgen wurde. die mikrowelle war dort als strahlenwaffe verbaut. 2 jahre später startete die erste deutsche flugscheibe. angetrieben von einem verbrennungsmotor. die antigravitation funktionierte aber sie wurde mit kleinen triebwerken angetrieben. kurze zeit darauf flog die haunebuh
naabtalschmied 1 month ago
@Grabgrub73 absolut richtig ! - haben einfach alles geklaut...
ralle247 1 week ago
パンターはやっぱカッコイイな。
atsushi1945 2 months ago
porsche engine und kruppsteel, who can defeat it?
ONeill45 2 months ago in playlist Liked
AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH ICH LIEBE DIESE MEDAL OF HONOR MUSIK !!!!!
therockjterror 3 months ago
I love to listen to this song when I'm renaming all of our gaming videos.
TheAstonishingJosh 3 months ago in playlist TheAstonishingJosh's favorites
No they wouldn't have been, at least not Russia. The German "Wehrmacht" was neither equipped nortrained for such a campaign and Hitler wanted to expand quickly and not wait until his troops had the proper training...
LegionaryCohort480 3 months ago
Without americas help in ww2 russia would have been totaly taken over and england too
gunner9081 3 months ago
@gunner9081 We know but you Americans weren't in sight until 1944. You weren't in Africa with the British, you weren't in Egypt with the British were was your navy in the north Atlantic?
Master91474 3 months ago 10
@Master91474
Nice list of errors, the US arrivied in NA in november 1942.
The british received lend-lease armour already in 1941, like the stuart light tanks and in 1942 tanks like the Lee/grant and the sherman.
Dreachon 2 months ago
Comment removed
Master91474 2 months ago
@Master91474
And another set of errors.
US troops landed like I already said in NA in november 1942.
US volunteers also fought alognside you in the battle of brittain.
And America declared war on Germany on 11 december 1941, you really should go back and read your history books.
Dreachon 2 months ago
@Master91474 your stupid ,moving on.
hailfire101 1 month ago
Comment removed
TheIRONSPQR 1 week ago
Comment removed
TheIRONSPQR 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Master91474 actually the U.S. was in Africa because Patton (a U.S. General) beat Montgomery, and the U.S. practiced landings for Overload in North Africa. You're right though the U.S. Navy was not in the North Atlantic, just U.S. cargo ships transporting goods, ammo, equipment and tanks to England with only 2 to 3 escort destroyers. The U.S. Navy was too busy with the U.S. Marines fighting a Second war in the Pacific. Please at least try to look at some history and dates, you fool
TheIRONSPQR 1 week ago
Однозначно, что танк скопирован с Т-34, возможно "Пантера" по некоторым параметрам на определенном отрезке времени и превосходил его, однако последующие разработки советских танкостроителей свели на нет все усилия фашистской Германии, на которых работала вся Европа
legatumseverus 3 months ago
German tank vs amy tank
the german shoot one on the army an he down
KATANA784 4 months ago
Yeah nice tank. But come on, look at the Russian T-34, dirt cheap to build, and was the only tank that could challenge a Tiger II, and win!
KorruptFeaR 4 months ago
@KorruptFeaR Are you fucking stupid? The T-34 couldn't touch a Tiger II. Point plank it couldn't even scratch the frontal armor.
PkayerZxz2 4 months ago
@KorruptFeaR WHAT? there is no evidences of a shoot that perforates a tiger II armour... WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW?
sepaol 4 months ago
Everyone is a World War 2 expert
barraki150 5 months ago 37
@barraki150 the cant not more as 1000 kilometers drive than the mootor over
bundeswehrsammler 2 months ago
@barraki150 no not everyone our history teacher doesnt no more than our Class about the WWII
Lukas4186 2 months ago
75mm L/70 ?
KonigTigerPorsche 5 months ago
@KonigTigerPorsche Yes, 75mm KwK 42 L/70.
jeebateeba56 4 months ago
Ta saloperie a semé la mort, la terreur et la misère dans toute l'Europe. On vous a foutu dehors et détruit tes "légendes", bon débarras. Merci encore d'être venu et de nous avoir laissé des souvenirs impérissables....
toto70sas 5 months ago
It was one hell of a tall tank. But it's presence was always noted by both German troops and their opposition, alas there were too few to be sufficient in quantity, and as one documentary said, turret rotation speed was fairly slow, for what it had situations of disadvantage..
Egodraco 5 months ago
This is my favourite tank of all time, and one hell of a tank 2 drive!
Thanks 4 Vid!
RaulMeatFactorys 5 months ago
im only watching this becouse of the game company of heroes to see if they look like! :D xD good vidoe
UkiKuki877 5 months ago
DIE LEGENDE OF LOOSERS:)))
SlavaSvarogu 6 months ago
@SlavaSvarogu "Because of USA inexpert troops, the war in Africa was delayed 2 years"..."Because of the fail of Operation Market Garden, the war in Europe was delayed 1 year"....Need me to go on?
excl0213 5 months ago
@SlavaSvarogu
Halt die Fresse du hund
ShabbasEy 5 months ago
yes, the world-wide know king tiger and the other WW2 german tanks were very powerfull, thats why the alies (USSR and USA) relied on numbers and on ambushes to destroy such an powerfull tanks.
sjkcm2 6 months ago
Comment removed
sjkcm2 6 months ago
Not only had but still have.
The Leopard series is one of the most sold and reliable tanks in the world so many countries use them today.
Somehow i am feeling sad that we Germans have a lot of trouble with a lot of things but still are able to build top rated war material like tanks, submarines and more at such a high quality...
It seems like the best we can is to build war related material, even after years :/
isard99 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My brother Markus Bott had been tortured during 5.5 years by the German BND,the former GESTAPO. I recorded more than 100 videotapes which ended up in the legal system. My brother was tortured during 1.5 years despite several legal procedures pending. He was assassinated on July 11th 2009 because of our homepage, linked on my channel, and our book Der Totalitäre Staat. If my homepage disappears,the BND will have assassinated me as well
Thumbs up if you want the BND to stop torturing my parents
wwwtotalitaerde 6 months ago
Germans had some of the best tanks- ever
Airsoftdude1403 6 months ago
someone knows a good ducumentation about the panther, which is on german?
dastotalebroetchen 6 months ago
sure is one of the best looking tanks of all time
Ialocin1985 6 months ago
i love this music !!! MEDAL OF HONOR *****/*****
Allcaponexx 6 months ago
Awesome, but at beginning it was called "ein Sorgenkind" from German commander because of its tech problems at its appeareance on front, then resolved.
HorizonDelta 6 months ago
да, пантера сочетает в себе так же хреновую черту загораться и выходить из строя по техническим причинам
Kremler0777 7 months ago
M Wittmann was a Tiger commander, IIRC, and died in the web of antitank gunfire that were generated by antitank tactics of that day. Flanking fire against enemy tanks is the most efficient way of stopping a tank attack. McNair's TDs were good at that, but the concept was flawed: US strategic goals required offensive action, and thin armor on TDs made them ineffective while attacking.
DonMeaker 7 months ago
lol its a baby king tiger love the panthers
dabezt1234 7 months ago
wenn de meinst ich finde den tieger immernoch überlegen da er eine sehr hohe reichweite hat jedem dass seine
Asgaardfighter 8 months ago
but T34 win second war...
losik01 8 months ago
танки победы....ураааааааа
stas19689889 8 months ago
гитлер давно капуп...ностальжи по русским танкам ...как хорошо...
stas19689889 8 months ago
Too bad for the nazis the Panther got the Hitler-changes-design-last-minute-upgrade-of-armor just before hitting production. After that, the engine, gears and suspension were too weak for it.
nkristianschmidt 8 months ago
like someoane said before it just look right. i think it whose the best on his time.another one said if it look right it will work whright
moldovanliviu 8 months ago
like someoane said before it just look right. i think it whose the best on his time.
moldovanliviu 8 months ago
For me the Panther looks like a tank should. It just looks "right".
RattytheSecond 8 months ago
@RattytheSecond Panther should look right: it was copied in several important features from T-34. By contrast US tanks had sloped front hull since 1928...
DonMeaker 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DonMeaker The Panther Design was developed before the T-34 had been seen on the Battlefield.
Oberst1985 7 months ago
ah that was a great ending clip with the panther cat
Atvor 8 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
totally crap tank.. unreliable and gun is even weaker than shermans
tropicthunder332 9 months ago
@tropicthunder332 -That is total crap that you are saying the gun was one of the most powerful and The tank had all...armor, speed,agility and german quality...please educate yourself....and sherman is known for selfdestruction-germans called it 'tommy kocher'because it burst into flames after it get hit by a panzer...U.S tanks are inferior to german and russian tanks!word
TheStormtrooper00 8 months ago 36
@TheStormtrooper00 Is that we own todays most technologicaly advanced tanks, the Abrams?
TheDARIEN54321 7 months ago
@TheDARIEN54321 ---the making of Abrams is coordinated with german engineers...It is easy to say we have this ,we have that but when war occurs it's the heart and resolve that make a difference,...
TheStormtrooper00 7 months ago
@TheStormtrooper00 Yes, that is why you have the Panther, which could be the worlds best tank because it is pretty much the same next to the Abrams except for a few more peices of technology and a less learning curve.
TheDARIEN54321 7 months ago
@TheStormtrooper00 ---King tiger was the crown of german engineering...now is leopard!
TheStormtrooper00 7 months ago
@TheStormtrooper00 The King tiger cost as much as a US Navy Destroyer, and was much less effective. Germany didn't have that much manufacturing to waste.
DonMeaker 6 months ago
@TheStormtrooper00 Abrams also coordinated with British Engineers to add Chobham armor. The Abrams gun was designed by Rhinemetall. The Turbine was US. I think the Wehrmacht had plenty of will and resolve, and still ended up as the 4th best army in Germany in 1945. Strategy counts, as if you attack both neutrals and allies (as German attacked Poland, USSR, and Italy, and declared war on US) you get outnumbered. Tactics count, as the Wehrmacht never had a tactical answer to US TDs.
DonMeaker 7 months ago
@DonMeaker ----yes they had too much enemies and few allies...But they have displayed unseen valor and fought until the end...and terror doctrine...they were feared and still is today.the wehrmacht is replaced with Bundeswehr
TheStormtrooper00 7 months ago
@TheStormtrooper00 Of course they had allies: Poland was a German ally against Czechoslovakia, until Germany invaded. USSR was German ally against Poland, until Germany invaded. Italy was German ally against France, until Germany abandoned them on the battlefield. No they did not fight to the end, the hard corps Nazis showed cowardice, and escaped down 'rat lines'. The SS veterans meetings were too well attended for the Germans to have fought to the last.
DonMeaker 6 months ago
@TheStormtrooper00 yeah your right but we hadn't enough from such tanks like Tiger and Panther
Chiller302 6 months ago
@TheStormtrooper00 I would rather say that german tanks are superior to EVERY other.
Uni0nDirect0r 5 months ago
@TheStormtrooper00 Ok you right about durability speed agillity and power BUT its weakness was its INTERNAL design.The rubber of the turret was needed replace oftenly and the electronical firring mechanism was a pain some times! Shermans were tin cans in mass production,T-34's were faster and more manuverable but light.And now in our days Germany prodused THE best tank for combat in mass production the LEOPARD 2.With other words Panther showed germans how to make tanks(through some mistakes)!!!!
TonyMcDark 4 months ago
@TheStormtrooper00 .
the true is:
France < USA < German < Russia
oh yeah !, the sherman is the counter of the PanzerIV, wtf are u talking about ?!, i think u everyday u fucking ur self with a nazi dildo !.
i dont know how many stupid are german that a fucking piece of crap of sherman firefly can fuck off to a tiger !, if u not have idea about tanks germans so STFU !.
The tiger is a piece of crap vs Pershing !
0puest0 4 months ago
@0puest0 a stupid american asshole!pershing tank is for homos!her mouth is bigger than you can.
MrTYPE97 4 months ago
@MrTYPE97 .
jajajajaa oh i see, u not have any idea what are u talking about.
0puest0 4 months ago
@MrTYPE97 -Tell this bastard...pershing looks nice but was chewed by tha big Cats!!
TheStormtrooper00 2 months ago
@0puest0 if it would give us not German, then the stupid ami would still ride on his mule.
MrTYPE97 4 months ago
@0puest0 Russia, France, UK and USA < Germany
barraki150 3 months ago
@barraki150 .
who the fuck say Russia is < of Germany ?
DeutschLand < CCCP Russia. !!!
0puest0 3 months ago
@0puest0 keep dreaming man
ExtremelyFlamable100 3 months ago
@ExtremelyFlamable100 .
?, entonces por que russia gano la guerra ?
tu me hagas desde las profundidades de tus sueños, no solo existe el IS y el T-34, existen muchos tanques como el KV, como los SU.
Rusia siempre fue mejor que Alemania, pero los Estadounidenses hacen pensar que los tanques nazis eran los mejores, para que piensen que ganaron a los mejores, pero no fue así.
Un claro el king Tiger, nunca fue destruido, es verdad, pero entraron poco al campo de batalla por no funcionar bien.
0puest0 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@0puest0 i only speak english and german
ExtremelyFlamable100 3 months ago
@TheStormtrooper00
... The Pershing was quite good, though
sk1llblack 3 months ago
@tropicthunder332
You do not know what you are talking about. The 7,5-cm-KwK 42 L/70 of the Panther was even more powerful than that of the Tiger 1 .Power to weight ratio was excellent. 15 HP/1 The M4 does not stood a chance against a Panther in open warfare. Just refer to wikipedia.
westhoefer 8 months ago
German Steel and good Engines who can take us down lol
OddjobHut 9 months ago
The tank has increased by so much that the tank just fall out of the category of medium tanks. He was only 1 ton easier to Joseph Stalin - 2 (iS-2) tank, which had a 122 mm cannon. Armor-piercing shell this gun from a distance of 1500 m was making frontal armor of Panther, so that the bouncing rear sheet. Panther tank had a lot of interesting mechanisms, really modern at that time and instructive today.
Imprudentman 9 months ago
How do you raise the center of gravity, reducing the reservation, to increase the visibility of the battlefield and others that can not be attributed to the merits.
Imprudentman 9 months ago
Перевод: русский > английский
Here's the thing. The standard layout of a German tank provided the location of the drive wheels in front. This had its advantages. Gearbox, too, was in the front. But through the whole body of the car held the shaft from the engine to the gearbox. Because of this, the German engineers have housing above. This led to an increase in weight of the machine with all the attendant problems
Imprudentman 9 months ago
Doesn't matter which tank was better, Tiger or Panther. The allies ruled the air, and the P-47 and Typhoon were nightmares to the panzers. P-47 and Typhoon had little to fear from the panzers. USAAF and RAF brought the war to Germany long before land forces arrived. Germany's real hope was the Type 21 submarine, which could have blockaded the Atlantic if it had showed up a year earlier, and possibly postponed or prevented the Normandy landing. Tiger tank was a poor use of limited resources.
TaliskerLaphroaig 9 months ago
@TaliskerLaphroaig
There is no way that a fleet of submarines , no matter how advanced it was , could stop the Americans and the Royal Navy forceing an invasion . Germany had virtually no surface fleet , and only the Luftwaffe could effectivelly counter the Royal Navy . Only way to defeat the land invasion of Normandy , without air domination, was at the bridgeheads with armoured counterattacks , even tho that too would be vulnerable to the massive firepower of allied ships .
Cosmin1511 9 months ago
@TaliskerLaphroaig -that's true but luftwaffe's stuka is far more maneuverable and faster,.,
TheStormtrooper00 9 months ago
der panther ist ein klasse panzer
toetjetoe 10 months ago
Comment removed
Fliegeraas 10 months ago
this is the music from MOH:Frontline lol
erichhartman 11 months ago
@cartmangsxr
schön --das du einer der alles besser wisser bist
aber keine ahnung hast!-
-
und-- ? würde es dich freuen- wenn mein höschen feucht ist- >
schwuchtel--->>>
Und? - das würde dir wohl gefallen - oder ???
osnajo 11 months ago
panther - tiger --- beide sind sie allen panzern des 2 wk `s überlegen
und das sogar bis in die 1960er jahre
erst ab 1964 gab es ein annähernd gleichwertigen panzer der us - army
den (M48A3)
kurz danach hatten wir schon den leopard 1 (1965 - leo1)
und wieder hatten wir den besten :-)
jetzt haben wir den leo 2 (A5/A6)
was soll ich sagen -> schon wieder der beste
also - die besten panzer kommen seid 1918 - eigentlich immer aus deutschland
- nur für die , die sich immer fragen!
osnajo 11 months ago
@osnajo
geht dir gerade einer ab oder hast nur ne feuchte Hose.
cartmangsxr 11 months ago
chuck norris has more firepower mobility and armor in one finger than thousand tigers :D
branko2301 11 months ago
name song?
esvilen 11 months ago
WHats going on at 3:26 !?
Did they stick an American gun on the turret or somethin?
jimmyxx3 11 months ago
@jimmyxx3 No, this is a Command-tank without a cannon... the one you see is a dummy. In german this Tank called "Befehlspanzerwagen" Panther.
TheGunnar68 11 months ago
@jimmyxx3
Actually the vehicle at 3:26 is not a command version of the Panther, panzerbefehlswagen Panther actually retained it's main gun.
The vehicle is what the germans call panzerbeobachtungswagen Panther, armoured observation vehicle Panther and it's an artillery observation vehicle with the main gun and ammo removed to make room for stereoscopic range-finder, range-plotting table and other instruments for artillery observation.
Dreachon 11 months ago
@Dreachon
Oh, i see XD
Thankyou for that, i never knew about it.
jimmyxx3 11 months ago
Musik????
SoltRash 11 months ago
sorry, konnte mir nicht sagen, dass über die Musik in diesem Video zu spielen?
SoltRash 11 months ago
My most favourite tank ever!
Tubercollosal 1 year ago
der beste Panzer des gesamten Krieges
MrLegolasegal 1 year ago
@PantherDanny What song did You use here I absolutely Love it!! Great combination between music and Video!!
lamamepper 1 year ago
@lamamepper its a medal of honor video game theme song if you want to know.
mrbrunopolska 1 year ago
panther is the best tank ever.because he is the perfect mix of speed,armor and firepower.
spyguybuy 1 year ago 29
@spyguybuy M1 Abrams is the best tank ever because it is a perfect mix... panther is just good
Americanrebel13 10 months ago
@Americanrebel13 Why are you comparing a modern tank with a ww2 tank, no shit the Abrams is going to be better.
Tiburone15 10 months ago
@Americanrebel13 leopard 2 A6 is the best tank.
Schneiderbeck2 10 months ago
@Americanrebel13 Comparing modern tank with a ww2 era tank = Fail.
Perilix 8 months ago
@spyguybuy not fire power, it could have used a larger round
FullM3tal7ack3t 10 months ago
@FullM3tal7ack3t:
he is the perfect MIX!
of course he got not the biggest fire power.
but the best firepower for that speed and amor.(MIX)
spyguybuy 10 months ago
@spyguybuy yes but it could still take a bigger gun, with more punch
FullM3tal7ack3t 10 months ago
@FullM3tal7achmm no.only if he lose armor and speed :-)
spyguybuy 10 months ago
@spyguybuy
And it looks good to boot.
NaneaAigee 10 months ago
@spyguybuy
thats not the truth!!!!
Tiger had a better armor
A 88mm Gun!!!!!!!!
and was faster than Panther!
AlexAlexno 10 months ago
@AlexAlexno:
he got the better gun and amor.and this bigger amor anf gun make him slow.
spyguybuy 10 months ago
@AlexAlexno
The tiger was slower than the Panther,
Tiger 1 max speed 37-38 km/h while the Panther does 46km/h in the ausf. A and G, earlier version seemed to have an even higher topspeed managing close to 55km/h.
Dreachon 9 months ago
@Dreachon
Tiger IV was the best Tank in the History of WWII !!!!
he gets 63km/h on short distance :)
He had 2-3 Board MGs (MG-42) !!
Hes the perfect warmashine!
AlexAlexno 9 months ago
@AlexAlexno
Really you need to get your facts straight.
Max roadspeed of the Tiger I is 37-38 km/h, Mg were 2 and 2 only one in the hull and the other co-axial, they were MG-34 not MG-42
Dreachon 9 months ago
When you have a pain in the ass you just want to act that would remove it. This has become a thorn in the 1941 T-34. Hi Dreachon:). However, your hasty action is not always the best solution. Especially engineered solution, although it may be effective to some degree. This story could not be more suitable for Panther tank. This tank had a gun with a good penetrating armor. Although he had a lot of engineering problems. Some of which have remained unresolved until the end of the war.
Imprudentman 9 months ago
@Dreachon -true but tiger is a fear factor for enemies
TheStormtrooper00 9 months ago
@TheStormtrooper00
Indeed, Tiger-phobia was there for a reason.
Dreachon 9 months ago
@spyguybuy -yes but i love tiger more bcs he's a horror for other tanks especially U.S.tanks!
TheStormtrooper00 9 months ago
@TheStormtrooper00 truth is, most US tanks was destroyed by panther.. US soldiers didn´t see the difference between tiger and a panther. The germans had the most effective crews, best training and was used to fight in 4/1 ratio to their disadvantage
Skari60 8 months ago
@spyguybuy thats why they still use its chaise, engine, and rifle -on different vehicles though :(-
inailboards 9 months ago
@spyguybuy es gibt einen besseren und zwar den tiger der is vllt nicht so schnell, jedoch er hat eine höhere reichweite
Asgaardfighter 8 months ago 3
@Asgaardfighter der Tiger ist nicht besser als der Panther, da der Panther schneller und wendiger war, was ihn in der Tat gefährlicher macht. Ich würde eher sagen, dass beide Panzer gleich gut sind, da der Tiger gute Panzerung hat. Zusammen wären se nicht zu verachten.
DerGeistDesKriegers 8 months ago
@Asgaardfighter Der Panther war tatsaechlich dem Tiger ueberlegen. Die 75mm Hochgeschwindigkeitskanone besass mehr Durschlagskraft als die 88er des Tigers und wurde nur von dem 88/L71 Geschuetz des Koenigstigers uebertroffen. Die Panzerung des Panthers war zwar duenner, aber vergleichbar effektiv da sie angewinkelt war.
peri2502 5 months ago
@peri2502
Da die Panzerung des Tigers nicht angewinkelt, richtete man ihn nicht mit der Front zum Gegner sondern immer mit einer Ecke des Tigers zum Gegner, so konnte man den Nachteil ausgleichen
Aufgrund der schlechteren Kanone und der dickeren Panzerung wurde er auch eher auf dem offenen Schlachtfeld eingesetzt als der Panther
PhonierDeluxe 5 months ago
@Asgaardfighter die kanone vom tiger ist aber auch keine anständige panzerkanone
es ist eine modifizierte mehrzweck flugabwehr kanone
die 75mm kanone des panthers ist eine speziell auf panzerbekämpfung entwickelte hochgeschwindigkeitskanone mit hoher reichweite, kadenz und mündungsgeschwindigkeit
die 88er vom tiger hatte zwar eine große reichweite aber nicht die vernichtungskraft einer kwk vom panther
TheLordZhufor 5 months ago
@spyguybuy Panther couldn't shoot on the move (and have a chance of hitting). Neither could Tiger, and both depended on their armor to withstand enemy shots until they could slow, stop, stop rocking, rev their engine to engage their hydraulic turret traverse, then fire. In the ambush, German tanks would run their engines, making them easier to spot.
By contrast, Sherman had stabilized gun, so they could shoot and hit on the move. In Ambush Shermans could traverse off batteries.
DonMeaker 8 months ago
@DonMeaker:
most of that about the panther is just wrong.
panther was stabilized.he can hit you 100% from 500 meters away.and drive(very fast) while shooting.
thats why the tank is great.he can move the gun tower 360 ° in 18 seconds.
but anyway.i talk about the best MIX of everything.
of course you can have a big ass amor like the tiger.but you lost speed.
spyguybuy 8 months ago
@spyguybuy Sorry, only US tanks were stabiliZed in WWII, and those provided to Soviets, French and Brits through Lend Lease. And Panther could turn turret quickly, if the engine was at high revs, meaning in neutral... and not providing motive power. They did have throat mikes which cut down on noise transmitted over the radio.
DonMeaker 8 months ago
@DonMeaker:
but only in horizontally way :-P
spyguybuy 8 months ago
@spyguybuy Stabilization on M-2, M-3, M-4, M-3 Light, M-5 Light and M-24 was in vertical plane. M-2 was never sent to war (had some odd features like deflector plates, so that when crossing trenches it could fire MGs down into the trench, and sponson machine guns to fire to the sides into a trench line). All the rest went to war, and did very well. Stabilizers don't solve all your problems, but do help you get your first hit a bit sooner. US tactics: advance past enemy tanks for flank shots
DonMeaker 8 months ago
@DonMeaker:
i want say vertical.sorry.
its only vertical,not horizontal.
spyguybuy 8 months ago
@DonMeaker u just have a look at the clips about M wittman. I rest my case...
TROAN73 7 months ago
@DonMeaker However nearly all documentation I have read refere to the Stabilizers as not really helping in combat. The aim was still handy-capped when moving at full speed or over very rough ground. The prime fact that a Sherman 75 had to close to within 200M to get past the Panthers front armour whereas the Panther's 7.5 cm KwK 42 L/70 was one of the best guns of WW2.
Besides it's all over now.
Skringly 7 months ago
@Skringly The thickness of the Panther (and other tanks) armor was why US tactics emphasized shots from the flank. Segment lengths on the western front were short, so the 500 meter range of stabilized Sherman was normally adequate, or could be made so. The excellence of the Panther gun and sights were degraded by White Phosporous smoke that the Sherman 75mm guns could fire. Panther was an excellent antitank gun, but cost about 4 times as much as the Stu-3, another excellent antitank gun.
DonMeaker 7 months ago
@DonMeaker Well the Panther had a larger and better gun than the Stug 3 (I believe that is what you were refering too) and had the added advantage of a turret. I truely think that Panther was as a fighting machine one of the best tanks of WW2. The only thing it lack was the numbers however they made 6000 only 1000 less than they made Panzer 4's. The only thing the Sherman had going was it's numbers and only T-34 challenges the panther for best tank in my mind.
Skringly 6 months ago
@Skringly The great thing Sherman had going for it was the 75mm gun which had a very good HE round which was effective against cheap antitank guns. That meant Germans couldn't successfully defend with many cheap antitank guns, rather chose to field a few, overpriced antitank guns housed in heavy tanks. Sherman was narrower, so could penetrate towns and forests, and had higher P/W, for more agility, better hill climbing, and greater reliability so after penetrating, could drive on and on
DonMeaker 6 months ago
@Skringly Panther had no more armor to shoot through than the Stu-III or Hetzer. Panther copied features from T-34, and those were indeed good features. Its torsion bar suspension added to height and weight. Panther's suspension filled with mud. Its transmission had a life of only 1000 hours, similar to its final drives and engine. Put the three together and you get a reliability of only 333 hours. Because of that, Germans had to deploy by train, limiting where they could attack
DonMeaker 6 months ago
@DonMeaker Panther had 80mm of armour like the Stug 3 however it was sloped at a 55 degree angle. This had the effect of almost tripling the protection it provided and even the 85mm of the T-34-85 could not penertrate the Panther's frontal armour. The same suspension allowed the Panther to travel at high speed across very un-even terrain, allowing the tanks to re face their armour in a hurry in the case that they got flanked.
Skringly 6 months ago
@Skringly The 76mm gun of the M-18 or Sherman, or the 3 inch gun of the M-10 had better armor penetration than the 85mm gun of the T-34/85. To compensate for not having neutral steer US tanks had faster turret traverse than German tanks. Panther was indeed able to move at high speed across rough or soft ground, but it could not shoot on the move. German regulations recognized that, and forbade shooting on the move. US tankers could, and could hit from a 'slow' rather than from a full stop.
DonMeaker 6 months ago
@DonMeaker Sherman 76. The M10 was better but the main shortcoming of the M-10'x 3 inch cannon was its APHE round, which was the round most commonly used for engaging tanks. The 3 inch APHE round was based on the naval 3 inch round and had a small charge in the rear of the round which was supposed to explode after penetration of the targeted tank's armor plating. Unfortunately it was discovered that it exploded on impact or shortly thereafter, causing the round not to penetrate.
Skringly 6 months ago
@Skringly M-10's 3 inch gun and M-18 76mm gun fired the same shell from different casings. Both had 135mm of penetration with High Vel Composite Rigid (RHS @ 30 degrees) at 1000 yards. The M1A1 used in M-18 and M-4 was lighter. It is true that early versions had that problem, but after it was discovered, they made it without the tail charge. both TDs and US tanks shot a lot more HE rounds than AP rounds and TDs in particular would supplement artillery waiting for the Germans armor to show.
DonMeaker 6 months ago
@Skringly Panther's 80mm of armor weighed more than Stu III because Panther suspension took up volume behind the armor. That added armor was Hitlers touch, added against the recommendation of military professionals who wanted a mobile attacking tank, not a pillbox with thin sides. With the transmission in the front along with the armor, the Panther was always nose heavy, and so would 'bounce' going over uneven terrain, slowing engagement times.
DonMeaker 6 months ago
@spyguybuy and a nightmare for every wehrmacht mechanic
livadi9 6 months ago
Ein weiteres Beispiel großer deutscher Ingenieurskunst!
LotrFC 1 year ago
Une très belle machine....le made in Germany !!!.....
laulam8369 1 year ago
My favorite tank!
kanefriessner 1 year ago
great tank! come drive it in World of Tanks ;)
love that beast
paganarh 1 year ago
Comparing german ww2 tanks with the allies tanks is like to compare a piece of gold with a piece of stinky shit. German 1940 tanks are not too far from modern tanks, nazi or comunist, with or vs the german, aryan or jew, you got to admit that the german ww2 tanks kicked ass more than any fucking other tank in that years...
TheRevenantGhost 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Der Panther war ein ausgezeichneter panzer. Der Sherman war kein Spiel für sie.
xXwakingthecadaverXx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Der Panther war ein ausgezeichneter panzer. Der Sherman war kein Spiel für sie.
xXwakingthecadaverXx 1 year ago
Comment removed
xXwakingthecadaverXx 1 year ago
What's the name of the song?
TheSonOfDumb 1 year ago
@TheSonOfDumb
Nevermind.
TheSonOfDumb 1 year ago
@TheSonOfDumb
Michael Giacchino - Sturmgeist's Armored Train.mp3
ggvw 1 year ago
If the Panther was your car, you could text while driving and still be safe.
TheSonOfDumb 1 year ago
Voll der Nazischeis ey rote armee hat den krieg gewonen nicht die vollblöden nazi Knüppelbumser!
SmashFascism93 1 year ago
true monsters of the past
KnotsOfWonders 1 year ago
The M4 Sherman wasn't the best tank of WWII, but probably the finest because it could be modified in many ways. How about a M4 Sherman FlameThrower/Calliope/dozer? :D
KokoaLover1 1 year ago
osnajo 1 year ago
@PantherDanny
versuche du erst mal dein deutsch zu verbesern
osnajo 1 year ago
True monsters O_O Thats Scary to Watch coming at you O_o
ColdRegina 1 year ago
One of my favourite tanks of WWII. 75mm KwK L/70 was one of the best cannons used in WWII. A bigger caliber doesnt mean better cannon.
Ixtzalit 1 year ago