Half-ass Solution- say the robots going to eat the cupcakes, then let the robot take more than one of them to eat.
Since the robot never specified which cupcakes, as long as it takes more than one you still guessed correctly, and it will be required to return the others.
Instead of "it's a trap, her reply should have been something along the lines of "That's right, you can't eat them if you give them back. However, since you said you'd give them back if I guessed right, and you admit that I guessed right, you have no choice but to not eat, and return, those cupcakes."
And don't trust that a robot's logic is always infallible. ;)
@kainthedestroyer yeah but if the robot returns the cupcakes then molly is wrong, and the robot shall not return the cupcakes... the paradox is apparent.
That's why I chose 'the robot will return the cupcakes' when I first did this, hoping that I'd be right and it would return them... but I guess I was wrong. The other way was a lose-lose situation, or a paradoxical situation.
@Dragon0007 If Molly was right, and the robot was going to eat the cupcakes, then Molly wouldn't be wrong when the robot returned them- the robot still intends to eat the cupcakes, they're just back in Molly's hands again. A paradox represents a situation that causes an issue/problem to repeat or that has no end. This clearly does have an end- Molly's right, the robot gives them back, and then eats Molly AND the Cupcakes.
@kainthedestroyer I see what you mean. But I think that giving them back and then eating molly and the cupcakes was not one of the original options. Obviously, the crocodile paradox is not something which has real life applications, its just a game of semantics, and in this particular case 'giving back the cupcakes' is meant to mean 'the robot does not eat the cupcakes' even after giving them back. So, giving back the cupcakes and then eating them is not part of the problem. Nice try though.
But it's not a legitimate paradox: The robot promised to return the cupcakes "if" it's intentions were predicted- Molly got it right, therefor the robots original intent cannot be followed through. It must return the cupcakes.
@theendofit You missed my point. It said "If you guess what I will do I will give them back" Providing two distinct results: If she guesses that it's intent was to eat the cupcakes, she would be correct and receive them back- because the robot hadn't already eaten the cupcakes, and assuming it can keep it's word, it has no choice but to return them.
@kainthedestroyer if he gives them back, she was wrong, she said he was going to eat them
no where in it did it say intent it said will do
think of it this
bob trys to kill someone and fails bob will not go to jail for murder because it was what they intended bob will go to jail for attempted murder caus it is what they did.
if a psychic says you will do something.. but instead someone stops you
making the psychic wrong, you only almost
you were asked to be the the psychic but doing stops it
BUT, if the robot gives them back, it would not have eaten them, so then she would have been wrong an the robot would have kept and eaten them, but then she would be correct, and that loops over and over
@kainthedestroyer true... she guessed what the robot's intentions were... so, technically, she was right, the robot had intentions of eating the cupcakes. the robot should give them back, and that's it. i win!
@kainthedestroyer Yeah, maybe, BUT its intentions were to eat them, therefore causing a paradox. But, instead of getting confused and blowing up, the robot decides to eat both the cupcakes and molly's head
@kainthedestroyer The paradox is: If she guessed correctly about what the robot would do with the cupcakes, it would return them to her "unharmed", so to speak. But since it was gonna eat the cupcakes, it could not return them to her, and since it could not eat the cupcakes since she guessed correctly, then her guess was NOT correct, so it gets to eat the cupcakes. But if it eats the cupcakes then she was right... Ect.
@kainthedestroyer not the robots intentions, but it's future. it could either a) give it or b) keep it. if it were b, the robot would have to give it away but that would mean that molly guessed wrong and would therefore not be given the cupcakes.
technically this is the one you dont fail at, because, it has the explanasion while the other, it does not, making the other one the real fail. epic fail on rocketboom's fault.
I don't get it, the obvious solution is to go get some water and seek vengence and stomp the fuck out of that robot. Thumbs up if you would use that solution.
but in paradoxes, there isn't a obvious solution. like with a crocodile, you kill it and take the babies, or in this situation, you dismantle the robot or somehow destroy it and take the cupcakes back... its not a choice, but meta-logic indicates there are more than one option, they just aren't shown
Why the hell would this usually involve crocodiles and stolen babies? Do people make deals with crocodiles saying that if they can predict what the crocodile will do with their baby they have to give it back? O_o
or there isn't a obvious solution. like with a crocodile, you kill it and take the babies, or in this situation, you dismantle the robot or somehow destroy it and take the cupcakes back...
If he wanted to eat cupcakes there is no paradox so he has to take them back, no matter he cant eat them because girl predicted what does he wanted to do.
@marcus10 he did not say tell me what i want to do he said tell me what i WILL do witch means it has to be 100% right. so if she said youll rub them in the dirt. and then the robot rubed them in the dirt he has to give them back after doing it.
in this case she said he would eat them . and she was right but after he eats them he cant give them back.
if she said he was going to give them to her she would be just plane wrong and he would then eat them
no..the robot is lying because he believes he wants to eat it so the terms of the agreement of giving it back was not applicable...its like putting a gun to someone's face and saying if you guess what im about to do, i wont shoot you. The person says you're going to shoot me. Then you shoot the person.
@sawsee28 he is not lieing becuse he did not say tell me what i want to do he said tell me what i WILL do witch means it has to be 100% right. so if she said youll rub them in the dirt. and then the robot rubed them in the dirt he has to give them back after doing it.
in this case she said he would eat them . and she was right but after he eats them he cant give them back.
if she said he was going to give them to her she would be just plane wrong and he would then eat them
Woops, just created a paradox. I was going to say wrong, but because you guesed correctly, I had to say right. Making the correct answer false, which makes it an impossible situation.
Catch 22 is basically a "you're screwed no matter what you do" kind of thing. It's based on a book. In it this guy didn't want to fly a dangerous military mission and there was a clause saying you didn't have to fly if you were crazy. Then there was catch 22 that said if you didn't want to fly for fear of your own safety you were sane and thus had to fly.
A man hires a teacher to help him become a lawyer, and agrees to pay the teacher after he wins his first case. Some time passes and he hasn't won a case and the teacher sues to get his money. What happens? (presumably if the lawyer wins, then he's won a case and thus has to pay the teacher yet the verdict just said he didn't).
@FatherTime89 he did not say tell me what i want to do he said tell me what i WILL do witch means it has to be 100% right. so if she said youll rub them in the dirt. and then the robot rubed them in the dirt he has to give them back after doing it.
in this case she said he would eat them . and she was right but after he eats them he cant give them back.
if she said he was going to give them to her she would be just plane wrong and he would then eat them
@FatherTime89 he did not say tell me what i want to do he said tell me what i WILL do witch means it has to be 100% right. so if she said youll rub them in the dirt. and then the robot rubed them in the dirt he has to give them back after doing it.
in this case she said he would eat them . and she was right but after he eats them he cant give them back.
if she said he was going to give them to her she would be just plane wrong and he would then eat them
@theboredone he did not say tell me what i would do with them he said tell me what i WILL do witch means it has to be 100% right. so if she said youll rub them in the dirt. and then the robot rubed them in the dirt he has to give them back after doing it.
in this case she said he would eat them . and she was right but after he eats them he cant give them back.
if she said he was going to give them to her she would be just plane wrong and he would then eat them
This actually fails the requirements of being a paradox. For it to be one, all of the premises need to be true, and oppose each other. This statement made by the robot, however, is not true:
"If you can predict what I am going to do with your cupcakes, I will give them back to you."
It's not a paradox, just a robot that lies to little girls to make itself feel better about eating them.
But what if its programming stated that it HAD to tell the truth? Then it'd be a paradox. But I suppose then that it wouldn't be able to say 'that's right, I'm going to eat them'.
@mvandemar he did not say tell me what i want to do he said tell me what I am going to do witch means it has to be 100% right. so if she said youll rub them in the dirt. and then the robot rubed them in the dirt he has to give them back after doing it.
in this case she said he would eat them . and she was right but after he eats them he cant give them back.
if she said he was going to give them to her she would be just plane wrong and he would then eat them
But this doesn't make sense. He only said to guess what he's going to do with them, that doesn't mean he has to do it.. he can still give them back right?
Nope. Because if he gave them back, it means he didn't eat them. If he didn't eat them, it means she guessed wrong. Which means he has to eat them. Which means she guessed right and he has to give them back. Rinse, repeat.
@theendofit She shouldn't have said anything in the first place. He only said to guess what he's going to do with them, that doesn't mean he has to do it.. she could've even guessed without speaking, in her mind. As long as she guesses, she should be safe, and the robot should just give them back.
I don't normally think in prejudices, but I think I have figured out why this stupid shit is here...
BLONDE!
She probably has this trick played on her all the time. It's not an interesting paradox. It's fucking stupid. Sorry, this just annoys the shit out of me. Shame on you, rocketboom.
If she guesses that the robot will eat them, her guess could be wrong by the robot's programming to give it back to her if she says those certain words.
Even tho its impossible to term with the agreement, it would help you stall time for a moment.
MrBrannfjell 2 months ago
Comment removed
MrBrannfjell 2 months ago
More like a paradox its like a legal loophole.
CalVoFrK6532 2 months ago
KILL THE ROBOT!!!! WE NEED A PULSE PLASMA RIFLE!
calistman222 3 months ago
There really is no paradox here. The Robot is lying and has no intention of returning the cupcakes.
1962mrpaul 3 months ago
how do you know that a robot witch likely does not digest human food cant give the cupcakes back afeter it eats them.
mafuyashi 4 months ago
id eat her ; )
TwistedMentality089 7 months ago 12
god damn it!
she gets nomnommed whatever i do!
this makes me feel powerless..
guys, dont play
OmfgItsHenu 8 months ago 2
A1 special effects! sarcasm paradox...:)
MrJmazing1 9 months ago
IT'S A TRAP!
Alexfantastico26 9 months ago
ENGLISH PLEASE
Ruldolphmaker 10 months ago
Here's a good paradox: THIS GAME.
griifster99 10 months ago
you are losing and winning at your own game there is no paradox
90AIMDOPE00 10 months ago
what?
mintoo2cool 11 months ago
he can return them if he throws up the cupcakes
DrMeh3 1 year ago
@DrMeh3 or shits them out.
gstanz67 10 months ago
I guessed he would return it to avoid a paradox.
webherring 1 year ago
The cake is a lie.
wargunnerguy 1 year ago
This chic should get together with Alanis Morisette so they can misunderstand things we learned in middle school together.
Being a robot, it's not possible for him to digest the cupcakes- which would be the real problem.
And even if he 'ate' them, he could give them back.
And there's no cupcakes in that box.
Why didn't she just do the baby and crocodile?
BenjaminTLaing 1 year ago
Half-ass Solution- say the robots going to eat the cupcakes, then let the robot take more than one of them to eat.
Since the robot never specified which cupcakes, as long as it takes more than one you still guessed correctly, and it will be required to return the others.
NoukonGlobal 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
omg I just saw molly topless!
ConradW 1 year ago
All her cupcakes are belong to the robot
PDLobster 1 year ago
IT'S A TRAP!
scubamax222 1 year ago
ROBOT IS A SPY!!!
Stupidproductions5 1 year ago
The robot eats the cupcakes and because it is not human (like a fridge or something) it gives them back to molly.That way the paradox is solved.
asdwsws 1 year ago 7
fail editing at 0:40 and the sound at 0:46 is from the Ibeer application for the Iphone
991woot119 1 year ago
wat
Peachtenders 1 year ago
IT'S A TRAP!
FluffyBunniesOnFire 1 year ago
It's a trap!
kaptainkarnage69 1 year ago
molly goes down on the robot
billyhkc 1 year ago
PS: That is to say, he can't give them back if he eats them, but he can still eat them if he gives them back.
kainthedestroyer 1 year ago
SIT A PART
LamentOfInnocence1 1 year ago
If the robot eats her first then eating the cupcakes would reunite the cupcakes with Molly, giving them back to her. Problem solved.
SpectralSpiral 1 year ago
this thing repeats again and again...
shahherwan93 1 year ago
@shahherwan93 That's THE paradox
phantasMoon69 1 year ago
@phantasMoon69 oh no.... :D
shahherwan93 1 year ago
funny I looked up paradoxes the other day
ps
I wish I could eat molly ;D
thegodofs 1 year ago
dumb
crash6871 1 year ago
Instead of "it's a trap, her reply should have been something along the lines of "That's right, you can't eat them if you give them back. However, since you said you'd give them back if I guessed right, and you admit that I guessed right, you have no choice but to not eat, and return, those cupcakes."
And don't trust that a robot's logic is always infallible. ;)
kainthedestroyer 1 year ago
@kainthedestroyer yeah but if the robot returns the cupcakes then molly is wrong, and the robot shall not return the cupcakes... the paradox is apparent.
That's why I chose 'the robot will return the cupcakes' when I first did this, hoping that I'd be right and it would return them... but I guess I was wrong. The other way was a lose-lose situation, or a paradoxical situation.
Dragon0007 1 year ago
@Dragon0007 If Molly was right, and the robot was going to eat the cupcakes, then Molly wouldn't be wrong when the robot returned them- the robot still intends to eat the cupcakes, they're just back in Molly's hands again. A paradox represents a situation that causes an issue/problem to repeat or that has no end. This clearly does have an end- Molly's right, the robot gives them back, and then eats Molly AND the Cupcakes.
Not a paradox, just a really cruel game.
kainthedestroyer 1 year ago
@kainthedestroyer I see what you mean. But I think that giving them back and then eating molly and the cupcakes was not one of the original options. Obviously, the crocodile paradox is not something which has real life applications, its just a game of semantics, and in this particular case 'giving back the cupcakes' is meant to mean 'the robot does not eat the cupcakes' even after giving them back. So, giving back the cupcakes and then eating them is not part of the problem. Nice try though.
Dragon0007 1 year ago
You can't have your (cup)cake and (let a robot) eat it, too.
conkt 1 year ago
i want to eat molly....out.....at a nice restaurant!
DeeperBlueX16 1 year ago
jealous of the robot ... i want to eat molly :(
Selo79 1 year ago
Woah =D Refrain from playing, and you win xD
NOSFERATUalu 1 year ago 2
lol crocodiles stealing babies!!Ahhh everyone to the party van o.O
shawzie1916 1 year ago
._.
fangbunneh 1 year ago
ITS A TRAP!!!
wowandmeatal 1 year ago
I thought these things were called "J-RPG"
Jeru3 1 year ago
she got eaten! NO!
samuraisharp3 1 year ago
watch?v=piVnArp9ZE0
King0fSand 1 year ago
If I were a Crocodile, I would EAT Molly's Robot baby like a big ol Cake!
chancho48 1 year ago
ITS A TARP!!
xylitol88 1 year ago
I say this is all a trap to increase rocketbooms views
unorthodoxJ 1 year ago
The robot shall return the cupcakes after it has eaten them.
NinjaCrane31 1 year ago
But it's not a legitimate paradox: The robot promised to return the cupcakes "if" it's intentions were predicted- Molly got it right, therefor the robots original intent cannot be followed through. It must return the cupcakes.
kainthedestroyer 1 year ago 48
@kainthedestroyer it did not say what he intends to do it says what will he do if he gives them back then she was wrong
theendofit 1 year ago
@theendofit You missed my point. It said "If you guess what I will do I will give them back" Providing two distinct results: If she guesses that it's intent was to eat the cupcakes, she would be correct and receive them back- because the robot hadn't already eaten the cupcakes, and assuming it can keep it's word, it has no choice but to return them.
kainthedestroyer 1 year ago
@kainthedestroyer if he gives them back, she was wrong, she said he was going to eat them
no where in it did it say intent it said will do
think of it this
bob trys to kill someone and fails bob will not go to jail for murder because it was what they intended bob will go to jail for attempted murder caus it is what they did.
if a psychic says you will do something.. but instead someone stops you
making the psychic wrong, you only almost
you were asked to be the the psychic but doing stops it
theendofit 1 year ago
@kainthedestroyer
Glad someone other than myself caught that.
dc9192 1 year ago
@kainthedestroyer
BUT, if the robot gives them back, it would not have eaten them, so then she would have been wrong an the robot would have kept and eaten them, but then she would be correct, and that loops over and over
shadow11479 1 year ago
@kainthedestroyer true... she guessed what the robot's intentions were... so, technically, she was right, the robot had intentions of eating the cupcakes. the robot should give them back, and that's it. i win!
MrDerby2u 1 year ago
@kainthedestroyer Yeah, maybe, BUT its intentions were to eat them, therefore causing a paradox. But, instead of getting confused and blowing up, the robot decides to eat both the cupcakes and molly's head
raheelandleon 1 year ago
@kainthedestroyer he*
DenialGuys 1 year ago
@kainthedestroyer The paradox is: If she guessed correctly about what the robot would do with the cupcakes, it would return them to her "unharmed", so to speak. But since it was gonna eat the cupcakes, it could not return them to her, and since it could not eat the cupcakes since she guessed correctly, then her guess was NOT correct, so it gets to eat the cupcakes. But if it eats the cupcakes then she was right... Ect.
icantfindaacc 9 months ago
@kainthedestroyer not the robots intentions, but it's future. it could either a) give it or b) keep it. if it were b, the robot would have to give it away but that would mean that molly guessed wrong and would therefore not be given the cupcakes.
youkeylaylee 8 months ago
technically this is the one you dont fail at, because, it has the explanasion while the other, it does not, making the other one the real fail. epic fail on rocketboom's fault.
DDTPZX 1 year ago
Mind = Blown
bangNL94 1 year ago
The cake is a lie!
HateNeverCeasesHate 1 year ago 2
IT'S A TRAP! BOTH OF THEM ANSWERS ARE FAIL!
jason24568 1 year ago
google searches for "crocodile paradox" just went up by 10000%
webber332 1 year ago
I don't get it, the obvious solution is to go get some water and seek vengence and stomp the fuck out of that robot. Thumbs up if you would use that solution.
ChinoMasFino 1 year ago 3
The cupcake, it's a lie!
gulllars 1 year ago
So evil of rocketboom to make a loop like this on the internet. DOn't they know what happens when you divide by zero?!
selvmordspilot 1 year ago
That proves it: Molly is a cupcake.
arad7613 1 year ago 47
Molly is so adorable :)
DustyNovaStars 1 year ago 3
Wait, What do I do Now, in both of them I fail? Is it game over?
Davey9449NEW 1 year ago
In Truth, the Robot could never eat Molly, Because she IS a Robot!
fenrisilver 1 year ago
What would happen if Pinocchio said "My nose will now grow"?
JaffarDS 1 year ago
when she was bouncing up and down and saying "your going to eat them" ...
I was looking at her boobs and thinking "I want to eat them"
Quusboy 1 year ago
Remove the Robots powerpack and you don't have a problem.
CaptKundalini 1 year ago
it doesn't matter if they are in cup form, the cake is still a lie
dravarian26 1 year ago
NOM!
BlackJeopardy 1 year ago
This sort of reminds me of the first Pirates Of The Caribbean movie where they were never specific enough when making a deal with Barbossa.
AussieImitator 1 year ago
THE ROBOTS A JACKASS!!!
but in paradoxes, there isn't a obvious solution. like with a crocodile, you kill it and take the babies, or in this situation, you dismantle the robot or somehow destroy it and take the cupcakes back... its not a choice, but meta-logic indicates there are more than one option, they just aren't shown
Stupidproductions5 1 year ago
Actually, the robot could give the cupcakes back after eating them. Robots do not digest.
TinyFlix 1 year ago 3
you fail it no matter how you go
xxcurnuxx 1 year ago
Catch-22
pieman128 1 year ago
ITS A TARP
sammygee17 1 year ago 3
ITS A TRAP
Pendragondnd 2 years ago
Why the hell would this usually involve crocodiles and stolen babies? Do people make deals with crocodiles saying that if they can predict what the crocodile will do with their baby they have to give it back? O_o
Spironic 2 years ago
@Spironic
only in america
Stupidproductions5 1 year ago
@Stupidproductions5 Elaborate...
Spironic 1 year ago
@Spironic its an old wize tale even 100's of years ago pepole understood this paradox
theendofit 1 year ago
He ate the wrong HALF!
RuitSpy 2 years ago
Are you sure?
How about a nice game of Chess?
Narrator007 2 years ago
damn, I can't belive some people find this as a new thing they have never seen in their lives...
I always got it...
I mean, this situation already happened in my life and the first time it happened, I knew this stuff
catadeluxe 2 years ago
A paradox is a paradox and it doesnt have any solution!!! even if you try the other options you'll lose anyway!
Mak3Th3Darkn3ssRoCk 2 years ago
@Mak3Th3Darkn3ssRoCk
or there isn't a obvious solution. like with a crocodile, you kill it and take the babies, or in this situation, you dismantle the robot or somehow destroy it and take the cupcakes back...
Stupidproductions5 1 year ago
@Stupidproductions5 so you are fast enof to take the babies away from a croc befor it closes its mouth.... yah right
theendofit 1 year ago
No I fail it D:
JLtheking2 2 years ago
the robot keeps on eating her head
deathbyplutonium 2 years ago
however i've fall in love with this girl !
LEADable 2 years ago
it's very frustrating
LEADable 2 years ago
What about you eat them and then the robot eats you, hence eating the cup cakes inside you.
Perhaps not even digested... totaly...
cocoesteves 2 years ago
it's a trap!
Katami83 2 years ago
i cant win!!! ahhh!!!!
humy12 2 years ago
oh i see, damn it!!....
it's just a homicidal robot!! - eating cupcakes was not enough, i guess he thought molly's head looked sweet enough, so chomp!!
KoRnDuDe19886 2 years ago 2
There is no win?! What is the point? This is unreasonable....
Travst357 2 years ago
i want to eat Molly's "cupcakes"
teddirez 2 years ago
If he wanted to eat cupcakes there is no paradox so he has to take them back, no matter he cant eat them because girl predicted what does he wanted to do.
marcus10 2 years ago
@marcus10 he did not say tell me what i want to do he said tell me what i WILL do witch means it has to be 100% right. so if she said youll rub them in the dirt. and then the robot rubed them in the dirt he has to give them back after doing it.
in this case she said he would eat them . and she was right but after he eats them he cant give them back.
if she said he was going to give them to her she would be just plane wrong and he would then eat them
theendofit 1 year ago
@theendofit Oh please... We all know that robot cant eat anything!
marcus10 1 year ago
she's screwed in any case!
MrMoneyclips 2 years ago
Comment removed
R5dashandahalf 2 years ago
...
I don't like robots anymore.
voiceofopinion 2 years ago
no..the robot is lying because he believes he wants to eat it so the terms of the agreement of giving it back was not applicable...its like putting a gun to someone's face and saying if you guess what im about to do, i wont shoot you. The person says you're going to shoot me. Then you shoot the person.
Its not a paradox...you just lied
sawsee28 2 years ago
@sawsee28 he is not lieing becuse he did not say tell me what i want to do he said tell me what i WILL do witch means it has to be 100% right. so if she said youll rub them in the dirt. and then the robot rubed them in the dirt he has to give them back after doing it.
in this case she said he would eat them . and she was right but after he eats them he cant give them back.
if she said he was going to give them to her she would be just plane wrong and he would then eat them
theendofit 1 year ago
*cry* nooooo! bad robot!
hvglaser 2 years ago
@MedicoreProductions so no matter how you play this game, molly gets her head eaten by the robot anyway?
KoRnDuDe19886 2 years ago 2
oMG! MOLLY NO!!
hellokittycuddleclub 2 years ago
Actually it's neither... They'll come out someday and then can give em to her.
Jarrettmonty99 2 years ago
ITS A TRAP!
M4N1F3570R 2 years ago 85
@M4N1F3570R Echoing memes makes you popular apparently...
Spironic 1 year ago
DaAce96: you are going to say: "WRONG"
Am I right or wrong?
sirscutter 2 years ago
@sirscutter Right
Woops, just created a paradox. I was going to say wrong, but because you guesed correctly, I had to say right. Making the correct answer false, which makes it an impossible situation.
DaAce96 2 years ago
@sirscutter Wrong! You were right!
Zaltor2 1 year ago
Wait what how's this a paradox? She predicted what the robot was planning to do so the robot must return them.
FatherTime89 2 years ago
If he eats the box he can't return them so he can't fulfill the agreement hence the paradox.
EmperorKagato 2 years ago
but if he is going to do it then he must do it it and hence he can not give them back. confusing i know :/
JesusGirlz09 2 years ago
No now because of the deal he has to change his plans and give them to her. She predicted what the robot was going to do.
Man why couldn't they do the courtroom paradox it's less confusing and a better catch 22.
FatherTime89 2 years ago
What's courtroom paradox and catch 22? Sorry if I commented this twice ^^
JesusGirlz09 2 years ago
Catch 22 is basically a "you're screwed no matter what you do" kind of thing. It's based on a book. In it this guy didn't want to fly a dangerous military mission and there was a clause saying you didn't have to fly if you were crazy. Then there was catch 22 that said if you didn't want to fly for fear of your own safety you were sane and thus had to fly.
FatherTime89 2 years ago
Courtroom paradox goes like this.
A man hires a teacher to help him become a lawyer, and agrees to pay the teacher after he wins his first case. Some time passes and he hasn't won a case and the teacher sues to get his money. What happens? (presumably if the lawyer wins, then he's won a case and thus has to pay the teacher yet the verdict just said he didn't).
FatherTime89 2 years ago
Thx :)
JesusGirlz09 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FatherTime89 he did not say tell me what i want to do he said tell me what i WILL do witch means it has to be 100% right. so if she said youll rub them in the dirt. and then the robot rubed them in the dirt he has to give them back after doing it.
in this case she said he would eat them . and she was right but after he eats them he cant give them back.
if she said he was going to give them to her she would be just plane wrong and he would then eat them
theendofit 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FatherTime89 he did not say tell me what i want to do he said tell me what i WILL do witch means it has to be 100% right. so if she said youll rub them in the dirt. and then the robot rubed them in the dirt he has to give them back after doing it.
in this case she said he would eat them . and she was right but after he eats them he cant give them back.
if she said he was going to give them to her she would be just plane wrong and he would then eat them
theendofit 1 year ago
She predicted what he would have done with the cupcakes. So by the terms of the agreement, he should give them back.
If he ate the cupcakes, and asked her to guess what he did with them to get them back... then he'd just be a jerk.
theboredone 2 years ago
@theboredone he did not say tell me what i would do with them he said tell me what i WILL do witch means it has to be 100% right. so if she said youll rub them in the dirt. and then the robot rubed them in the dirt he has to give them back after doing it.
in this case she said he would eat them . and she was right but after he eats them he cant give them back.
if she said he was going to give them to her she would be just plane wrong and he would then eat them
theendofit 1 year ago
was our reward jiggle?
insertfunnyusername9 2 years ago 2
(reply to this) what is the next word I'm going to say?
DaAce96 2 years ago
cookie
thespoofarthurchanel 2 years ago
@thespoofarthurchanel wrong
DaAce96 2 years ago
Light: ITZ A TRAP
CantHoldDownLeeFan13 2 years ago
Molly D:
NorProductions 2 years ago
But... why does the robot have to bite her head off at the end??? Now there's the real paradox.
LaborHours 2 years ago
This actually fails the requirements of being a paradox. For it to be one, all of the premises need to be true, and oppose each other. This statement made by the robot, however, is not true:
"If you can predict what I am going to do with your cupcakes, I will give them back to you."
It's not a paradox, just a robot that lies to little girls to make itself feel better about eating them.
mvandemar 2 years ago
What Molly says is true. Never question Molly.
obeyme3 2 years ago
This girl fails "it".
eggkunt 2 years ago
But what if its programming stated that it HAD to tell the truth? Then it'd be a paradox. But I suppose then that it wouldn't be able to say 'that's right, I'm going to eat them'.
Tenfrente 2 years ago
@mvandemar he did not say tell me what i want to do he said tell me what I am going to do witch means it has to be 100% right. so if she said youll rub them in the dirt. and then the robot rubed them in the dirt he has to give them back after doing it.
in this case she said he would eat them . and she was right but after he eats them he cant give them back.
if she said he was going to give them to her she would be just plane wrong and he would then eat them
theendofit 1 year ago
Isn't that a catch 22
Tempust 2 years ago
I kept Molly safe by pressing pause.
Not much however.
Probewitch 2 years ago 2
IT'S A TRAP!!
gartini 2 years ago 25
Guess what, it's a trap!
kamilfreeman 2 years ago 3
I have no idea what's going on.
kazzansky 2 years ago
But this doesn't make sense. He only said to guess what he's going to do with them, that doesn't mean he has to do it.. he can still give them back right?
PsyberKayos 2 years ago
I think its along the lines that...
What is he going to do? Going to eat them
If he returns them before he eats them then the above will become false since it changes to return them. ... ? Maybe?
I had the same doubt as you...
MrAizakku 2 years ago
Nope. Because if he gave them back, it means he didn't eat them. If he didn't eat them, it means she guessed wrong. Which means he has to eat them. Which means she guessed right and he has to give them back. Rinse, repeat.
Penguiroo 2 years ago
@PsyberKayos but then he would not have done what she said he was going to do meaning he could then eat them
theendofit 1 year ago
@theendofit She shouldn't have said anything in the first place. He only said to guess what he's going to do with them, that doesn't mean he has to do it.. she could've even guessed without speaking, in her mind. As long as she guesses, she should be safe, and the robot should just give them back.
PsyberKayos 1 year ago
Its a TRAP!!
tanker58p 2 years ago
:O Oh Noooos!!
DemonGod20 2 years ago
I don't normally think in prejudices, but I think I have figured out why this stupid shit is here...
BLONDE!
She probably has this trick played on her all the time. It's not an interesting paradox. It's fucking stupid. Sorry, this just annoys the shit out of me. Shame on you, rocketboom.
alexmigda 2 years ago
ITS A TARP!
Alkarin11 2 years ago
IT'S A TRAP!
poptarttoshi 2 years ago 2
Nooo, is there no way to save Molly? :(
Stupid molly-eating robot.
TechnoHeroine 2 years ago
@TechnoHeroine molly is cute. (: we should band up and make a anti-molly eating robot group.
fossilpro 2 years ago
yo, answer you are going to keep the cupcakes. The robot must satisfy A, then immediatly satisfy B. victory!
wizkidme 2 years ago
This game is H4X0R3D! (lol...)
meele1110 2 years ago
Wait... you can't even win it!
AngryRantingNerd 2 years ago
YOU ALWAYS FAIL!!!
Mylenthes 2 years ago
ITS A TRAP
JoeytheGrape 2 years ago 2
I would prefer getting to watch a baby get eaten. I understand where you're coming from but it's not the best example.
IhaveCombosia 2 years ago 2
If she guesses that the robot will eat them, her guess could be wrong by the robot's programming to give it back to her if she says those certain words.
findyourintelligence 2 years ago
You guys are more fun than a barrel of robots
chopsddy3 2 years ago
Bounce more pls :D
islandboy2510 2 years ago 54
D: you keep playing till you die!
cascas2284 2 years ago
@cascas2284 Yes, because it's a paradox. How is it a game if you can't win? But they call it a game. It's a crocodile paradox.
Molbyn15 2 years ago