I think if the semi trucks actually hit square and not off center of each other and the car, look closely, cause the car is off center by about 2-3 feet. (notice how part of that car is compacted perfectly). that its possible. Not to mention if you slow down those semis a bit you reduce the amount of impact thus making pancaking more possible, instead of an explosion of metal.
I once threw a cigarette butt down on the pavement and it landed standing up. its about odds, anything is possible
Busted huh? So they didn't do it the same, had a ton of variables that allowed it to mess up, and said its busted. I'd say its plausable if done properly.
To achieve a similar result to the commercial (which obviously faked the set-up) would be very difficult to set up accurately. For a start, you'd need at least two identical cars to drop - the first would be used purely for timing purposes. You'd also have to rig up a 4,000ft cable (or possibly several) to ensure it fell directly down rather than veer off course.
whats the dif between the US and the UK in this experiment A the US spend a million dollers proving newtons law UK spends fuck all have a short guy of a motor show ACTUALLY DRIVING THE CAR AND NOT R BLOODY C car and they get the same result
@xxkil Yeah, Hamster lost too =( I'm always shocked by how much the Mythbusters (Adam and Jamie) are not allowed to do themselves since I'm a big fan of Top Gear.
@xxkil Yeah, you Brits are so lucky you have a TV show about a guy driving a car... We're all frightfully jealous of you, all we've got is cars dropped from helicopters and cement mixers packed with 800 pounds of TNT. But we'd trade it all to see that obnoxious twit drive around in circles.... *Sigh*....
Clearly, its not about seeing whether or not Newton was right, the myths are scarecrows to hang science and experimentation on. Did you really think anyone cared about that car commercial?
@samten10a What do those things matter to anything? They were never trying to PROVE anything, it was just a car commercial for chrissake! Its about science and experimentation, quit nitpicking!
Thank you for uploading this special episode. I had a blast watching it. I love the Mythbusters, and this "Demolition Derby" special episode was fantastic!
The vehicles used in the demolition derby should be entered together in a modern art competition, provide a catchy name like Man’s Inhumanity toward the Machine. You never know you might start a new art form. (Of course Sky net will probably send Terminators after you, but still we must suffer for our art)
@jmmtcidc Ha! I was literally just thinking "Shit, just crunch the numbers, see if the car will hit the ground before the other crosses the X. I could do that with the stuff I learned back in 11th." Then I scrolled down & saw your comment lol.
so ya the helicopter was at 4000 feet but the car was lower than that so does that make a difference? Was the car at 4000 feet in the commercial or was the car at 3000 something feet?
Viewer gripe!! Okay, car started and maintained a constant velocity of 105mph travelling on the x. car 2 started at 0mph and accelerated to terminal velocity in the air. They're comparing a constant velocity vs an acceleration, and they still couldn't beat the falling car. This myth is completely impossible (I'd be skeptical even with an F-1). They should do these kinds of problems and explain the math before doing the experiment for the viewers and THEN prove why they won't work. ROCKET SLED!!!
Please. if you want to debate Newtonian Physics, don't swear, because it makes you look unproffessional, and makes people who know a decent amount about physics shake their heads and laugh.
@Sunaarashii dude... You seriously disn't listen in physics class when you were at school... More weight does NOT make you fall faster... Basic newtonian physics...
@ieshghi You seriously only listen to some bad tv shows. 2 objects will fall only at the same speed if there would be NO friction. Like in vacuum. In air a stone would fall FASTER then a feather. Why? Cause of the friction. That's why a falling car would stop accelerating at some point, if the friction slows it down the same amount as the gravity accelerate it. More weight = higher top speed. Back to school dude.
@Sunaarashii Well, that IS correct, but in this case (car beig dropped from helicopter) the weight difference is negligable. the important thing is the position and the surface area of the object falling, because of the air resistance. Air resistance isn't much influenced by the weight of the object, since I can take a feather and a small stone of the SAME weight, and the feather wil still fall much slower than the stone, since it has a much larger surface area. Sorry to dissapoint you dude.....
@ieshghi like i told kafre before, you could take 2 balloons, one filled with water the other with air. Both balloons have the same size and shape. But the one with water will drop faster. Same here. With the same surface area a heavier car can reach a higher falling speed. The air friction is the same, but the heavier object has more power. Your turn dude.
@Sunaarashii Correct, but negligable since the terminal velocity difference is not going to be very high.
The other thing to take into account in your example is the difference between the specific weight of water ant specific weight of air. A 1 litre ballon full of air weighs only a few grams, while a litre of water weighs a kilogram. that is about (not actual numbers) 500% weight difference. A car that weighs 10 tons (only an example) and one that weighs 10.5 is not comparable(5% difference)
@ieshghi Yeah, water is much heavier than air, sure. But the waterfilled balloon drops MUCH faster then the one filled with air. A car weight 0.6 - 2 tons. I don't know how much extra weight they put into the car, but it still "some" more. Even if it only 5% difference, that makes the falling speed higher. I don't know if it is a 5% speed increase or less/more. Don't ask me.
Weight does induce faster falling in a NON-VACUUM environment, because of the higher amount of friction it causes. however it is negligible in this case since the speed difference is very small. We were both kind of right after all... Nice discussing this with you. ;)
@Sunaarashii No, a balloon doesn't fall "faster". It might reach it's terminal velocity faster, but it will NOT fall "faster" than the balloon filled with air. There is only a certain speed at which an object can fall, and that speed is the SAME for all objects in a vacuum. The ONLY thing wind shear does is slow down the rate at which an object reaches its terminal velocity. An object of the same size and shape, but different weight, will fall at the SAME speed.
@kafre67151 i cant believe, that someone like kafre still exist in this world... maybe he should drop himself with a rubber doll designed by himself and filled with helium out of a helicopter. hey you wouldnt die, because you have the same shape! you could do the world a great favor, if you would test this for us ;-D
My problem with this is they did not compensate for the shorter distance of the car on the groud being closer the helicopter drop height was the same.
@otfphotography they shorten the distance, because the car on the ground was SLOWER. But the falling the car had the same gravity, so the same speed. But... they add some weight to the car to balance it. More weight = faster fall. Also did they add the length of the rope to the height?
@Sunaarashii More weight does NOT equal a faster fall. Basic Newtonian laws state that all objects fall at the same rate in a vacuum. The ONLY reason an object would fall faster than another object is wind shear. Meaning more friction from wind makes it fall slower. The same car with 5,000,000,000,000,000,000 (I know it's overdoing it, but it's a point) would fall at the SAME approximate speed as the original car.
@kafre67151 You answered it for yourself. Basic Newton laws works only in vacuum. Not in air. If we take the friction into account, more weight allows us to reach a higher top speed. Best example: take 2 baloons. Fill one with air, another with water. Drop both of them. They don't drop at the same speed. The heavier waterbaloon can accelerate to a higher top speed. Same in this video, the "balanced" car could reach a higher topspeed, so it were faster.
@Sunaarashii No, it can't you dumbass. If you were to take a marble and bowling ball and drop them at the EXACT moment, they would land at the EXACT SAME TIME. And, guess what, a bowling ball is THOUSANDS of times heavier than a marble. Guess what? They fall at the same speed! Learn your basic Newtonian Laws, you fucking retard!
@FlankTank Newtonian Laws apply in all situations, even in an uncontrolled environment. Right now, go push on your wall. Guess what? You got pushed back because the wall was firmly held in place. Guess what? Newtonian Law: for every action, there is an equal an opposite reaction. Go put a ball on a table. Guess what? It stays still. Newtonian Law: An object at rest tends to stay at rest unless acted upon by an unbalanced force. All in an UNCONTROLLED environment.
@otfphotography Yes, they did. The shorter distance was to ONLY make up for the fact that the car couldn't go as fast. The fall from the helicopter would have fallen at the same approximate speed regardless of how far they dropped it from. Meaning, if they lowered the car, it would have hit upwards of 10 seconds sooner, giving entirely inaccurate results.
This is the first time I've seen this. I watched the last race probably a dozen times now...it's crazy! They did an awesome job making it feel like you were there
@faxepl That is due to the fact that the sound traveling through the air is significantly faster than the force of the explosion traveling through the ground creating the visible shockwave.
@wouldyounot11 You're saying that sound travels faster through air then solid materials? That's a joke, right? Of course the sound is edited - sound of the explosion should be heard at the time that the shock wave moves the grass near the camera.
@faxepl actually what causes the "shockwave" is not sound. it is the explosive force traveling through the ground. the sound is an entirely different matter and it does travel faster than the explosive force traveling through the ground... Basic Physics...and if you have ever actuallbeen near a significant explosion or sutdied basic science you would probably know that.
Don't be so bitter, Adam. Sure the fans bitched the first time, but you got to see a two stage rocket sled, and a 500lb HE steel-fusing blast because of it.
@antihwman I agre with you, I don't why you are getting thumbs down votes. They are making fun out of it. As a matter of fact, take a close look 'In memorium' is incorrect. In memoriam is the right one.
Only the Mythbusters can get away with that. I love them.
I think if the semi trucks actually hit square and not off center of each other and the car, look closely, cause the car is off center by about 2-3 feet. (notice how part of that car is compacted perfectly). that its possible. Not to mention if you slow down those semis a bit you reduce the amount of impact thus making pancaking more possible, instead of an explosion of metal.
I once threw a cigarette butt down on the pavement and it landed standing up. its about odds, anything is possible
PaladoreEric 7 hours ago
Who do i have to talk to when i want to see Adams or Jamies life instead of my own when i die?
erikmuench 1 week ago 2
0:43 best blast everrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
ESHWANTH1 3 weeks ago in playlist More videos from iLuk4z
I love mythbusters but if they stopped repeating everything that they have already said this whole show would be like15 mins long...
rzlosty 3 weeks ago
Busted huh? So they didn't do it the same, had a ton of variables that allowed it to mess up, and said its busted. I'd say its plausable if done properly.
xPyroxx 4 weeks ago
next time use aspahalt instead of dirt i thnik that is gonna make a difference
hooftcommandantstijn 1 month ago
@boibo1 me to man high five yeah :)
kaceron21 1 month ago
what is at 0:39 ??
theluca9500 1 month ago
To achieve a similar result to the commercial (which obviously faked the set-up) would be very difficult to set up accurately. For a start, you'd need at least two identical cars to drop - the first would be used purely for timing purposes. You'd also have to rig up a 4,000ft cable (or possibly several) to ensure it fell directly down rather than veer off course.
mittfh 1 month ago
@mittfh Plus the commercial speed was 142 not 105. So for me it's plausible.
ggglllllll 3 weeks ago
what did you do today? oh nothing I just dropped a car from 4000 feet.
devonverrydt 2 months ago 2
LOL asian saying its dangerous for Caucasian to drive? lololol im asian :D
boibo1 2 months ago 3
the haning car was way below 4000 feet because its hanging a hundred feet under it
Ihdc1 3 months ago
@Ihdc1 im pretty sure they were accommodating for it...lol
TheAndroidNerd 3 months ago
@Ihdc1 even if they were 100 feet under it wouldnt take 2 sec to drop 100 feet at terminal velocity
SnoFreaxx 2 months ago
Rest in Pieces. Hahahaha!!!
anymous1997 4 months ago
whats the dif between the US and the UK in this experiment A the US spend a million dollers proving newtons law UK spends fuck all have a short guy of a motor show ACTUALLY DRIVING THE CAR AND NOT R BLOODY C car and they get the same result
xxkil 5 months ago
@xxkil Yeah, Hamster lost too =( I'm always shocked by how much the Mythbusters (Adam and Jamie) are not allowed to do themselves since I'm a big fan of Top Gear.
toree117 5 months ago
@xxkil Yeah, you Brits are so lucky you have a TV show about a guy driving a car... We're all frightfully jealous of you, all we've got is cars dropped from helicopters and cement mixers packed with 800 pounds of TNT. But we'd trade it all to see that obnoxious twit drive around in circles.... *Sigh*....
Clearly, its not about seeing whether or not Newton was right, the myths are scarecrows to hang science and experimentation on. Did you really think anyone cared about that car commercial?
Stillwater900 4 months ago
but the car landed past the x. so if it were exactly on target... it would be a tie
oOWinterNightOo 5 months ago
@oOWinterNightOo But it would have still hit the floor first because its the same height
TimotheosPrice 4 months ago in playlist More videos from iLuk4z
@TimotheosPrice yes but the x is closer the the car of the road.
oOWinterNightOo 4 months ago
I was going to try this at home but they told me not to. Dang!
gpost2800 5 months ago
Two problems;
How do they know it was 4000 ft and not 3700 ft?
.
How do they know the car was released exactly when the car crossed the start line?
.
Their systems left too much to chance called human err .
samten10a 5 months ago
@samten10a What do those things matter to anything? They were never trying to PROVE anything, it was just a car commercial for chrissake! Its about science and experimentation, quit nitpicking!
Stillwater900 4 months ago
"And once Jamie stepped out of the crater, the fierce battle with desert overlord Chuck Norris began, then... meh I can't be bothered.
sachamun 6 months ago
Thank you for uploading this special episode. I had a blast watching it. I love the Mythbusters, and this "Demolition Derby" special episode was fantastic!
IamMagPie 6 months ago
Cool !
myselfpatte 7 months ago
@jmmtcidc But it won't be as much fun that way. :D
fewsecondstoolate 7 months ago
such a waste of cars :(:(:(
eizlez 7 months ago
The vehicles used in the demolition derby should be entered together in a modern art competition, provide a catchy name like Man’s Inhumanity toward the Machine. You never know you might start a new art form. (Of course Sky net will probably send Terminators after you, but still we must suffer for our art)
TimberwolfC14 7 months ago
This problem could be solved with 11th grade physics with a lot less effort.
jmmtcidc 8 months ago
@jmmtcidc Ha! I was literally just thinking "Shit, just crunch the numbers, see if the car will hit the ground before the other crosses the X. I could do that with the stuff I learned back in 11th." Then I scrolled down & saw your comment lol.
randomperson300145 8 months ago
@randomperson300145
Never scroll down on comments before watching the vids, spec if theyre exciting and awsome as these been.
ppl just spoil.
Also like to thank the uploader :D
Maxen89 6 months ago
@jmmtcidc Yeah great idea! Lets film Grant in a room with a calculator figuring out which car would hit the X first!....
Oh wait.. there never was any "problem" TO be solved, it was just about science and experimentation. Its a freakin car commercial for chrissake.
Stillwater900 4 months ago
is it just me or is adam starting to turn into Doc Brown from Back to the Future?
daveman2k 9 months ago
Best. explosion. ever. Thank you for sharing it was AWESOME! ^-^
lizzybug1234 9 months ago
How about a nitpick that has nothing to do with physics?
It's "memoriAM," not "memoriUM"
(Brought to you by your friendly neighborhood former Latin minor.)
aeternamente13 10 months ago 20
so ya the helicopter was at 4000 feet but the car was lower than that so does that make a difference? Was the car at 4000 feet in the commercial or was the car at 3000 something feet?
niplapla 10 months ago
@niplapla it would but the distance was maybe 100 feet at most that would be a 1.5 second diffence still busted
seanpirwin 10 months ago
Song at 00:9?
cobolt13 10 months ago
It beat the driving car by only two seconds. I'd say that was close enough.
DavidUmstattd 10 months ago
Viewer gripe!! Okay, car started and maintained a constant velocity of 105mph travelling on the x. car 2 started at 0mph and accelerated to terminal velocity in the air. They're comparing a constant velocity vs an acceleration, and they still couldn't beat the falling car. This myth is completely impossible (I'd be skeptical even with an F-1). They should do these kinds of problems and explain the math before doing the experiment for the viewers and THEN prove why they won't work. ROCKET SLED!!!
steveecker 1 year ago
We didn't start the flame war~!
Please. if you want to debate Newtonian Physics, don't swear, because it makes you look unproffessional, and makes people who know a decent amount about physics shake their heads and laugh.
In an unrelated note, thanks for cheering me up.
w1q2e3r4t5 1 year ago
kari was so emotional because she was 1 month pregnant when this was happening
soccerkidtrevor 1 year ago
that rocket sled impacting with the red car makes me want to piss my pants with laughter!
metal666micky 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2 people are married to dogs
Ukairsoft4u 1 year ago
2 people are married to dogs
Ukairsoft4u 1 year ago
Comment removed
OroTod 1 year ago
@Sunaarashii dude... You seriously disn't listen in physics class when you were at school... More weight does NOT make you fall faster... Basic newtonian physics...
ieshghi 1 year ago
@ieshghi Gallilei proved this :)
3harderstyles 1 year ago
@ieshghi You seriously only listen to some bad tv shows. 2 objects will fall only at the same speed if there would be NO friction. Like in vacuum. In air a stone would fall FASTER then a feather. Why? Cause of the friction. That's why a falling car would stop accelerating at some point, if the friction slows it down the same amount as the gravity accelerate it. More weight = higher top speed. Back to school dude.
Sunaarashii 1 year ago
@Sunaarashii Well, that IS correct, but in this case (car beig dropped from helicopter) the weight difference is negligable. the important thing is the position and the surface area of the object falling, because of the air resistance. Air resistance isn't much influenced by the weight of the object, since I can take a feather and a small stone of the SAME weight, and the feather wil still fall much slower than the stone, since it has a much larger surface area. Sorry to dissapoint you dude.....
ieshghi 1 year ago
@ieshghi like i told kafre before, you could take 2 balloons, one filled with water the other with air. Both balloons have the same size and shape. But the one with water will drop faster. Same here. With the same surface area a heavier car can reach a higher falling speed. The air friction is the same, but the heavier object has more power. Your turn dude.
Sunaarashii 1 year ago
@Sunaarashii Correct, but negligable since the terminal velocity difference is not going to be very high.
The other thing to take into account in your example is the difference between the specific weight of water ant specific weight of air. A 1 litre ballon full of air weighs only a few grams, while a litre of water weighs a kilogram. that is about (not actual numbers) 500% weight difference. A car that weighs 10 tons (only an example) and one that weighs 10.5 is not comparable(5% difference)
ieshghi 1 year ago
@ieshghi Yeah, water is much heavier than air, sure. But the waterfilled balloon drops MUCH faster then the one filled with air. A car weight 0.6 - 2 tons. I don't know how much extra weight they put into the car, but it still "some" more. Even if it only 5% difference, that makes the falling speed higher. I don't know if it is a 5% speed increase or less/more. Don't ask me.
Sunaarashii 1 year ago
@Sunaarashii OK. So let's just leave it at this:
Weight does induce faster falling in a NON-VACUUM environment, because of the higher amount of friction it causes. however it is negligible in this case since the speed difference is very small. We were both kind of right after all... Nice discussing this with you. ;)
ieshghi 1 year ago
@ieshghi I'm still thinking, that it MAY be fast enough to give 1-2 seconds to win the race. But that's a lot of math.
Well, thanks for using the brain in this discussion ( *points @kafer67151* ). Let's call it a day then :)
Sunaarashii 1 year ago
@Sunaarashii No, a balloon doesn't fall "faster". It might reach it's terminal velocity faster, but it will NOT fall "faster" than the balloon filled with air. There is only a certain speed at which an object can fall, and that speed is the SAME for all objects in a vacuum. The ONLY thing wind shear does is slow down the rate at which an object reaches its terminal velocity. An object of the same size and shape, but different weight, will fall at the SAME speed.
kafre67151 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kafre67151 i cant believe, that someone like kafre still exist in this world... maybe he should drop himself with a rubber doll designed by himself and filled with helium out of a helicopter. hey you wouldnt die, because you have the same shape! you could do the world a great favor, if you would test this for us ;-D
OroTod 1 year ago
Death toll:
10 cars
2 trucks
3 truck trailers
1 rv trailer
1 bus
unihara 1 year ago
@unihara Sure was hard to flip that bus. Greyhound and Trailways make it look so easy.
alpha18412 1 year ago
Now that these cars have had a good life, may they now rest in pieces.
Awesome Show, I wish I had it on Blueray
Geoffr524 1 year ago
A moment of silence please for the cars who bravely gave their lives ....Especially the red car hit by the rocket sled...
theotheo12 1 year ago
That rocket was fast!!!! epic fast!
TheMusic2599 1 year ago
I'm finding what the junior team does kind of silly. Donno why.
str8out 1 year ago
@racedemon89 I was her first sexual experience. She can't talk about that now because even just thinking about it gives her a massive orgasm.
DVDluvr123 1 year ago
I do love all those super natural Jamie jokes...
DarkvindFromIllier 1 year ago
I'm a big Mythbusters fan. My most favorite show. But you guys can't do the German Precision
type25sti 1 year ago
"Rest in pieces" xD
iPODtouchUSER1995 1 year ago 11
What if the falling car was stripped of the interior and engine?
metalguitar1011 1 year ago
That shadow of the shock wave is AWESOME!!
"You're right, it is a little potato chippy" xD
TasteOfTorment 1 year ago
It would of been awesome if one car landed on the other
zhzhzh5 1 year ago
My problem with this is they did not compensate for the shorter distance of the car on the groud being closer the helicopter drop height was the same.
otfphotography 1 year ago
@otfphotography they shorten the distance, because the car on the ground was SLOWER. But the falling the car had the same gravity, so the same speed. But... they add some weight to the car to balance it. More weight = faster fall. Also did they add the length of the rope to the height?
Sunaarashii 1 year ago
@Sunaarashii More weight does NOT equal a faster fall. Basic Newtonian laws state that all objects fall at the same rate in a vacuum. The ONLY reason an object would fall faster than another object is wind shear. Meaning more friction from wind makes it fall slower. The same car with 5,000,000,000,000,000,000 (I know it's overdoing it, but it's a point) would fall at the SAME approximate speed as the original car.
kafre67151 1 year ago
@kafre67151 You answered it for yourself. Basic Newton laws works only in vacuum. Not in air. If we take the friction into account, more weight allows us to reach a higher top speed. Best example: take 2 baloons. Fill one with air, another with water. Drop both of them. They don't drop at the same speed. The heavier waterbaloon can accelerate to a higher top speed. Same in this video, the "balanced" car could reach a higher topspeed, so it were faster.
Sunaarashii 1 year ago
@Sunaarashii No, it can't you dumbass. If you were to take a marble and bowling ball and drop them at the EXACT moment, they would land at the EXACT SAME TIME. And, guess what, a bowling ball is THOUSANDS of times heavier than a marble. Guess what? They fall at the same speed! Learn your basic Newtonian Laws, you fucking retard!
kafre67151 1 year ago
@kafre67151 you should calm down. Newtonian Laws don't apply in a non-controlled environment. Learn your basics before spewing out bullshit.
FlankTank 1 year ago
@FlankTank Newtonian Laws apply in all situations, even in an uncontrolled environment. Right now, go push on your wall. Guess what? You got pushed back because the wall was firmly held in place. Guess what? Newtonian Law: for every action, there is an equal an opposite reaction. Go put a ball on a table. Guess what? It stays still. Newtonian Law: An object at rest tends to stay at rest unless acted upon by an unbalanced force. All in an UNCONTROLLED environment.
kafre67151 1 year ago
@FlankTank guess what, thanks for proving my point
FlankTank 1 year ago
@otfphotography Yes, they did. The shorter distance was to ONLY make up for the fact that the car couldn't go as fast. The fall from the helicopter would have fallen at the same approximate speed regardless of how far they dropped it from. Meaning, if they lowered the car, it would have hit upwards of 10 seconds sooner, giving entirely inaccurate results.
kafre67151 1 year ago
I was hoping that one car would land on the other
AVeryIronicGoose 1 year ago
Most awesome special!
Eagle4Delta 1 year ago
0:56 xD hahahaha!
Sindrio2 1 year ago 11
sweet
sajenmoeller 1 year ago
This is the first time I've seen this. I watched the last race probably a dozen times now...it's crazy! They did an awesome job making it feel like you were there
ckd04 1 year ago 2
Thats one huge remote control car :D I would like to have one like that!!! :D
chrisstudio2006 1 year ago
How come on every video u can hear the explosion BEFORE the shockwave even gets to the camera?
faxepl 1 year ago
@faxepl That is due to the fact that the sound traveling through the air is significantly faster than the force of the explosion traveling through the ground creating the visible shockwave.
wouldyounot11 1 year ago
@wouldyounot11 You're saying that sound travels faster through air then solid materials? That's a joke, right? Of course the sound is edited - sound of the explosion should be heard at the time that the shock wave moves the grass near the camera.
faxepl 1 year ago
@faxepl actually what causes the "shockwave" is not sound. it is the explosive force traveling through the ground. the sound is an entirely different matter and it does travel faster than the explosive force traveling through the ground... Basic Physics...and if you have ever actuallbeen near a significant explosion or sutdied basic science you would probably know that.
wouldyounot11 1 year ago
RIP Grant's trailer
kenji0771synkro 1 year ago
Mythbusters the greatest show EVER!!!
blarghonk25 2 years ago 15
Yeah, busted. AGAIN, busted.
Don't be so bitter, Adam. Sure the fans bitched the first time, but you got to see a two stage rocket sled, and a 500lb HE steel-fusing blast because of it.
chenalos 2 years ago 5
Stop the Vid at 0:14 there is a red light ball before the white pulver explode ?! what the hack is that ?
Laplathechoosenone 2 years ago
I think it might have been a weird lense flare.
DeltaPhi79 2 years ago 3
lens flare. happens.
Buuub08 2 years ago 3
weird
mariobrothersmakers 2 years ago
thanks, loads more please!!!!
systemofadown8ks 2 years ago
Thanks SO MUCH for uploading these. I'm a big fan who can't afford to pay cable right now.
Best episode ever. :0)
Flecha57 2 years ago 65
thanks for the uploads!
BLSooo1 2 years ago 14
This has been flagged as spam show
can you please reupload this?
schwarg 2 years ago
Why??
iLuk4z 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
grants a homo
DEFOAIO 2 years ago
thank you so much for sharing this with us!Mythbusters for life dude!! :D i wish, i could work with them....:)
ottlik86 2 years ago 67
from 7:10-7:37 is the best
antihwman 2 years ago 2
@antihwman I agre with you, I don't why you are getting thumbs down votes. They are making fun out of it. As a matter of fact, take a close look 'In memorium' is incorrect. In memoriam is the right one.
Only the Mythbusters can get away with that. I love them.
Cheers. :0)
Flecha57 2 years ago 5
Comment removed
antihwman 2 years ago
Love Mythbusters!
salesairtech 2 years ago 11