Deceive the kids! How evolution is pawned off as science!

[AenimaDerZeitgeist]

What a joke.

[alyosha24601]

@AenimaDerZeitgeist No, I'll tell you what is far more humorous: It's when grown adults ignore & twist scientific results in order to continue supporting a RELIGIOUS faith in a failed 19th century theory - all because they are terrified there might be a God who holds them accountable. I say, just hate God if you like, but stop pretending we "evolved". DNA does nothing but degrade today. All we actually observe is mutation and extinction. Evolution is quack science; most of the world knows it.

[AenimaDerZeitgeist]

@alyosha24601 First of all, science is not made of dogmas and loopholes, it allows "ignoramus" when something cannot be proved at the moment, and no one writes a scientific law "because God told them"...

This is how it works: you get an idea, you see if it applies, if not you reformulate it, if so then you have a possible, I repeat, POSSIBLE explanation for something. If you think science is just a load of crap, go back in your cave and ask God for fire and food.

[alyosha24601]

@AenimaDerZeitgeist Creationists have the greatest respect for science. We believe in the scientific method and in natural selection. What we don't believe in is a fairy tale called "evolution" because what we actually observe today is DNA degeneration - EVERYTHING IN NATURE RUNS DOWNWARDS TOWARD MORE DISORDER. The 2nd law is a mathematical law and we see it everywhere, except the mythical theory. Now see my newest video called "The Funniest Moment in Science" for how evolutionists twist science

[geoffr57]

I think you are seriously deluded to think that evolution is a religion. I worry about fundamentalists taking over the world.

[alyosha24601]

@geoffr57 Evolution is indeed a religion. Its name is "scientism". Evolution uses scientific language but ignores the conclusions of experiment. It is actually based on an unscientific naturalistic presupposition. If you remove the requirement that a naturalistic origin is required, the science itself leads you to creation. Actual observation reveals rapid DNA degeneration, mutation, and extinction today - not "evolution". The evolution myth is quack science! Does that make me "dangerous"?

[pen64]

God is Dead - HAIL SATAN!!!!

[alyosha24601]

@pen64 See my video about the 7 Characteristics of Hell. You should find out about just how dead that God you mock really is before you meet him. Cheers!

[philgrinspoon]

Lol evolutions preposterous but I suppose the bible isnt

[alyosha24601]

@philgrinspoon You mean, "Evolution is preposterous, but I suppose the Bible isn't" Yes, you have supposed correctly!

[novakjohn5]

Assholes

[alyosha24601]

@novakjohn5 Go to your mommy to learn some manners, then come back to me to learn some science!

[CreationismMirrored]

@alyosha24601 You've made it abundantly clear that your aim is antithetical to science.

[1spiders1]

Evolution is a fairy tale for grownups with scientific vocabulary.

The Chinese scientists have criticised evolution and said that the Americans have left science and turned it into a religion.. And the “mainstream science” is big time bullshiting and bullies in suites with a complete herd type mentality and behaviour. It’s just a fuckin joke now

[CreationismMirrored]

@1spiders1 Incorrect, evolution is the backbone of modern biology and the only empirical explanation for biodiversity. Try learning anything about anything before making a comment, you'll save yourself embarrassment

[1spiders1]

@CreationismMirrored

No its not, it’s actually useless.

[alyosha24601]

@1spiders1 How is it you can worship King Darwin when what we observe today is rapid DNA degeneration in every species? How can we have evolved if we're devolving today? I'll tell you how: "Evolution is my religion and Darwin is my priest! Do confuse me with science that doesn't fit into my Darwin-religion. If you object to this theory you're fired. You can't be right, despite the science! Hail Darwin! Hail Holy Darwin!" Sorry all - this particular commentator is my number one pest.

[ScienceOfTheMovies]

@alyosha24601 Incorrect, as I pointed out to you before, Sanford's work on genetic entropy, which he was unable to get published by the way, completely failed to take into account 1: Processes which add genetic information and 2: The fact that selection is non-random.

So no, your inability to comprehend actual genetics is not an argument against evolution.

[alyosha24601]

@ScienceOfTheMovies Any potentially beneficial mutation is absolutely overwhelmed by the damage of the typical mutations. You better watch this video again. "Non-random"? You're saying mutating DNA chains have a mind of their own? That's religious thinking Mr. Evolutionist! Watch out!

[Kaopsis]

@alyosha24601 Incorrect, selection is non-random. This means beneficial mutations are selected for and move through the population.

[alyosha24601]

@Kaopsis Of course selection is non-random. Unfortunately, mutations are totally random and deleterious mutations outnumber good ones a million to one. DNA only degrades, it does not "evolve". This is why evolution is a fairy tale. Natural selection happens, we see it. We never see evolution - except in the textbooks! It's a lie.

[narceron]

proof dispels ignorance, except in the face of faith...which both sides assume is well placed.

I say let the proof speak.

[alyosha24601]

@narceron You are correct and may find it very interesting to watch a typical debate on origins & evolution. You'll find that the creationists talk science, while the evolutionists prefer to speak about philosophy and religion. It's comical. Spend a day and research it. Then please do consider the implications!

[CreationismMirrored]

@alyosha24601 If you think any creationist at any point has ever offered science for their position, you need to research the basics of epistemology yourself as bare assertion and pure fallacy is not evidence but is all the creationists offer.

[brickwall911]

all at once happens via Alpha-Male, one father that has 1000s of offspring. dont see that today cause everyone is a sucka...

[flangeup]

If you ever get the time (between making stupid videos) you should spend a few days going through the archeology / paleontology sections of the Smithsonian museum.

[DarthElius]

When it comes to willfiull ignorance of facts and a complete lack of intelligence you need look no further than the people that think sceince is "a joke" or "quack science" and yet these are the same people that believe there is a guy sitting on CLOUD that knows all, sees all, and yet you still have to pray to "him" in order for "him" to know what you want and need... REALLY??? Oh and yeah it also makes sense that all humans came from ONLY TWO PEOPLE... Again, REALLY???

[alyosha24601]

@DarthElius I want everyone to notice that this fellow's reply is essentially religious - not scientific. Why? Like most of my commentators, there really are no answers to the approx. fifty problems with old earth/evolution, so he just insults, mocks, and expresses his "faith". By the way, we discovered in the 1970s through analyzing the mitochondrial DNA that every single human is descended from one woman. Everyone. It was even on the front cover of TIme magazine! (then quickly ignored)

[DarthElius]

@alyosha24601 Please explain how my reply was in any way religious. Science is the opposite of religion in pretty much EVERY sence of the word. I'm also interested to know what these "fifty problems with old earth vs evolution". Please enlighten me, if you will. Actually I have heard about the one woman decendence theory. Even if that is true that still would mean there would of had to have been alot of "Adams" running around. Because SCEINCE has shown what inbreeding does...

[alyosha24601]

@DarthElius The religion is called "scientism" - putting science at the center of ones worldview. Evolution involves a naturalistic precondition that rules out supernatural intervention by definition. But if that precondition is discarded, the science will point to no evolution and a young earth. I would be happy to take you through it, but honestly, I'm tired. I get a dozen attacks here a day. Just ridicule. If you would like to watch my videos for an hour I can answer science questions. Cheers

[ABriefHistoryOfTime]

@alyosha24601 Science is the exact opposite of a belief, beliefs are held in spite of complete lack of evidence while science hinges tentatively on the empirical data.

It doesn't rule out anything, it's just that everything found thus far completely and exclusively supports a naturalistic explanation. If you disagree I would ask what supernatural evidence has been ignored?

[MaeNotEast]

And this anti-science vid relates to the coked up egg vid how? Anyway, evolution is not a religion any more than cricket is. Just so you know, there are millions of "Christians" who believe in evolution and not in that Young Earth crap. I am one of them.

It's sad but I've come to loathe using the word "Christian" because of all the zealots spreading their insanity.  They seem to have gained some ground during G.W.'s reign - maybe it was his claims that Jesus wanted him to be president.

[alyosha24601]

@MaeNotEast Evolution is basically religious, it is not supported by evidence. Do you really think Stalin & Pol Pot had no religion? They were priests of atheism. You don't agree with the Bible, which is the source material for Christianity, so you have made up your OWN religion. As for the young earth, why do we find C-14 in diamonds? Atmospheric Helium still increasing? Why isn't the sea saturated with salt? Magnetic field fallen 14% in two centuries? Moon's orbit? "Old earth" = quack science.

[ABriefHistoryOfTime]

@alyosha24601 'why do we find C-14 in diamonds?'

Because of Uranium-Thorium series decay, this has been pointed out to you at least once before.

[unknown3333333333333]

@alyosha24601 What?

[Woostercat]

I wonder where you get your sources for these "mind-boggling statistics." Hopefully not from some incredibly biased religious website.

[alyosha24601]

@Woostercat My favorite number is from Carl Sagan, he understood the mind-boggling math. I think you need to learn more about evolution - not just the theory, learn the scientific facts they do not teach you in school. They don't come from Christian sources, but somehow only creation scientists openly discuss them. You need to learn more about the many many problems with evolution. It is total 100% quack science based on one thing: a naturalistic presupposition. Drop that, and it falls apart.

[ABriefHistoryOfTime]

@alyosha24601 That's because creation 'scientists' are the only ones scientifically illiterate enough to buy into them.

When someone begins rambling about 'this is impossible based on odds from pure chance' in regards to a process that isn't chance-based, you can be assured they have no idea what they're talking about.

[alyosha24601]

@ABriefHistoryOfTime So, random chemicals have a mind of their own? Who doesn't know what they're talking about? Tell me, how did sexual reproduction arise - millions of exact, dominant, complimentary mutations - all in one generation!!?? I'm surprised evolutionists don't play the lottery more, they don't seem to act on what they "believe". Evolution is quack science! Bye bye now!

[AffairWithGravity]

@alyosha24601 Strawman, you're confusing natural with random. Hydrogen has no mind of its own, the process of fusion has no mind of its own, yet they continually produce helium and other heavier elements through non-random processes.

In the same sense, peptide bonding etc. are not chance based processes.

The cowardice of your censorship tells me that you know your position is unable to stand up to scrutiny.

[alyosha24601]

@AffairWithGravity Stop trying to monopolize my channel. Please go bug someone else. You don't offer scrutiny, just mockery. Take your religion that says hydrogen self-assembles into people after 14 billion years and be happy. You can face God and explain how smart you are, as for me, let me be. Please don't make it your mission to make trouble here. Read Darwin somewhere and have fun. Bye bye!

[AffairWithGravity]

@alyosha24601 As long as you keep posting such utter retardation, I'm going to keep correcting it.

[alyosha24601]

@AffairWithGravity This is your religious mission. Don't tell me you don't have faith - you're at war with God.

Go bug the Muslims.

[Woostercat]

Haaa. At least I don't believe in a book that was written by desert savages about two thousand years ago.

[alyosha24601]

@Woostercat 2-4000 years ago. Those "savages" included 300+ accurate prophecies of the future, an amazing numeric system a computer can't design today, accurate science not known at the time, hidden messages under the text, and an amazing coherence over 2000 years with 40 authors - everything is linked. It is the foundation of western civilization. But you're best not think about it, if you were to read it, you might start to feel like you need to change. Maybe fear! Better to live for fun now.

[acedovick]

There are a lot of transitional fossils. I'm not sure how you got the idea there arent. You can watch the progression of dinosaurs to birds quite easily with fossils.

It's not quack science. It's the most widely accepted description of how we came to be.

We didnt evolve recently from apes. We split off from their genome long ago. Once our ancestors started using tools we named them sapiens. that was recent. however our genome goes way back

[alyosha24601]

@acedovick Colin Paterson, the curator of the British Museum of Natural History - the largest fossil collection in the world - said a while back he was not aware of ANY transitional fossil. The whole discipline of taxonomy assumes no transitions. Today we observe extinction, DNA degeneration, and mutation - not evolution. To go from an ape to a man in 2.3 M yrs takes a perfect 1200 base pair mutations 150,000 times in a row! Evolution is a religious belief, not a scientific one. Quack science!

[ABriefHistoryOfTime]

@alyosha24601 Actually that's an ignorance of genetics, not that it wasn't expected. There is no such thing as a 'perfect' mutation. The dissimilarity between humans and chimps derives from the continual accumulation of mutation over the past 5-7 million years of divergence.

No, ignorance of evolution does not constitute it being 'quack science'

[alyosha24601]

@ABriefHistoryOfTime I am relatively ignorant of genetics, but my math is pretty good! Let's see, 2.3 million years of divergence, 6% difference in the genome. That's a "perfect" mutation chain of 1200 base pairs every generation 150,000 times in a row. No recessive mutations (80% are recessive today) and each offspring must find the exact mate. Of course irreducible complexity must be ignored. Also, DNA is DEGRADING today, and fast. I think we both know evolution never happened. It's religion.

[ABriefHistoryOfTime]

@alyosha24601 Again there is no such thing as a 'perfect' mutation, there are mutations and they accumulate, approximately 125 to the zygote in primates. 125 per zygote, averaging 10 years per generation for 5-6 million years, yes that's well within the range of divergence.

Single mutations do not result in speciation, so both partners do not have to share the gene and irreducible complexity isn't ignored, it's dismissed because it's an argument from ignorance and incredulity.

[unknown3333333333333]

@acedovick Oh, here goes Mr Darwin... Again.

[alyosha24601]

@unknown3333333333333 Please - watch your language!

[alyosha24601]

Evolution is the national "creation myth". A scientist can criticize the government without fear - but he can never never criticize evolution.

And yes, Carl Sagan "believed" in it, despite being well aware of the mind-boggling statistics against it. Let's be realistic. With all we know today, it takes RELIGIOUS devotion to continue to endorse "evolution". Be honest and hate God if you like, but let's stop twisting science: evolution never happened.

[DarthElius]

@alyosha24601 I'm sorry but I just have to ask... Do you actually believe that drivel you just spouted or are you trying to be funny... Either way, You are the closest thing there is to proving evolution wrong... After all chimps have shown to be more intelligent than that... Hmm, maybe you are right... God made Adam, Adam got bored, god took a rib from Adam and made Eve (wait, why did he need to take a rib from Adam if he just made Adam out of nothing?) After that the human race was born...

[alyosha24601]

@DarthElius I will be happy to discuss science with you, but there is no science here, just the usual insults. I recommend you learn a few of the facts you've never heard before mocking something you know nothing about. Take a day and look at the main 20 arguments of creation scientists. There are even eight subjects on my channel covered by various professors. If you're just putting your trust in the establishment, you've bought into a religion called "scientism". Evolution is quack science.

[DarthElius]

@alyosha24601 You are right and I'm sorry. I should not have been so mean. However are the things about what YOU believe an insult too? I only ask because you simplely must let me know what year you think this is. You have no proof behind your argument. Where SCEINCE is not a religion because it is about PROVING things to be true or false. And RELIGION is about not questioning what you are told and being blind to the world around you. You seem smart, read something NEW and learn REAL truth.