@Jakearoo14 How she ever got voted in is a miracle itself was she running against a retard, yep she said unemployment checks were the fastest way to create new jobs and when askedabout the new health bill she said well we will just have to see whats in it! What a ding bat Research it if you think Im pulling your legg you and me should have run were smarter and what is so wrong is just 4 seving 4 year term she gets her 186k + for life plus her blue ribbion health care CA please vote her out!
Hard to get all of that in when you are only given enough time to make a few blurbs. The average American has the attention span of a gnat and the education of an 11 year old when it comes to politics and economics.
Agreed with the previous poster that Nick needs a wardrobe expansion. Possibly even with clothing that is not black.
Red leather is never acceptable on a man, now on a hot woman it's great. Just saying if he is going to be the main face for the publication/organization perhaps a wardrobe person is called for.
As far as politics, social issues, economics, and journalism in general Reason is head and shoulders above the pack. It's tragic that Libertarianism is not acceptable to 95% of people and likely never will be. Move a healthy chunk of GOP voters away from Cop/Mil worship and you'll open the door.
I have been reading, not just subscribing to, Reason for 20 years. One thing I don't do is read it with my guns, their chambers open waiting for the civil war to occur. Kooks give Libertarians a bad name. You night want to work on your presentation.
Because you can see I own a few guns via looking at my page you assume I am a kook? Way to stereotype! Can i safely assume you are are doper do not shower regularly since you seem to be a Libertarian?
Hayek and Friedman were heart surgeons where Keynesians are homeopaths: their pills are placebos so when the arteries clog, they're as good as useless.
Most brilliant political move I have seen in along time is the "We saved _____ amount of jobs." Because you can't prove they did or didn't and it sounds like they did :(
I actually saved 20 lives on my way to work this morning by consciously making the decision to not run them over with my car. How many lives did you save today?
Cavuto is a tool. Nick, aside from Napolitano, nobody at Fox actually gives a crap about you. They're just acting like your friend because they are in "bitch about Democrats" mode. Once Republicans get back in power, you'll still be saying the same thing and they'll treat you like you're a raving lunatic.
Don't pander to these guys. All they care about is their own agenda.
Who is pandering? It's obvious from my previous comment.
Fox only cares about "limited government" at the moment because of the Democratic majority in government. Fox doesn't ACTUALLY support the things that Nick talks about, they just pretend to in order to bitch about Democrats. Nick can't be stupid enough not to realize this; he's pandering to their agenda by coming on their shows just so he can get some exposure.
Now whether you think this pandering is a good or bad idea is another topic of discussion, but I would have to say that I think it's a bad idea. Fox is going to kick him to the curb when the Republicans become the majority again. Napolitano is the only person at Fox that actually says what he believes and has meaningful discussions with guests like Nick, and Fox limits him to a web show that nobody watches.
I just don't see any positive angle to Nick appearing on these TV shows.
Fox News gets way more ratings than any of the other national news stations. Not only that but they are the only national news station that isn't liberal. So regardless of whether or not Fox News will "kick him to the curb" if he wants to get his message out there to even more viewers Fox is a great way to do it. If you can't see the advantage of Gillespie getting his point of view out to more people and i'll add, people that will listen to him, than you need to open your eyes.
Only national news station (I think you mean channel) that isn't liberal? What are you smoking? I guess you've never watched MSNBC before.
Not that it matters, because "liberal" and "conservative" when it comes to the media are meaningless terms. They're just distractions created to keep people from noticing the blatant corporatism.
Nick isn't getting his point out, there's not enough time. Instead, he's coming off as if he's just another Fox News parrot.
I had put news "organization" but i ran out of space so i put station lol.. but MSNBC are you serious? They are the biggest liberals in the media.
Its funny how liberals or democrats don't see just how biased things have become. i guess maybe if you were on the other side you would have to notice. But in all seriousness, yes fox news is the only right leaning news national news station on tv. Olbermann, Maddow and Schultz all liberals all msnbc..
I can tell when i'm talking to a liberal or dem because they are always clueless.. Seriously if you didn't know MSNBC was a liberal news station then trust me your clueless.
lol black and white, i'm not a republican either i may lean towards the right but i'm still a libertarian.
Gillespie doesn't need Fox News anyways he has Reason Magazine and YouTube.
My guess is that there's a growing market for libertarian ideas and Fox is responding like any self interested organization. Red Eye is a libertarian friendly show on Fox News and they have Nick Gillespie on quite often.
Thorbie The reason for libertarians being on Fox is also because when it comes to economy there is virtually no difference between conservatives and libertarians. (Please dont bring up Bush, he was conservative, like Im a fluffy kitten)
While that tends to be the case, conservatives often don't go as far as libertarians do in terms of focusing on the importance of limited government on all fronts and I think few conservative commentators have made the case against the Fed and returning to the gold standard, as opposed to libertarians. In my opinion, specifically libertarian ideas are coming into fashion with the growing tea party movement and the past year's rise in sales of Atlas Shrugged. Just my view though.
Thorbie You are correct on the Fed, but I think that has to do more with knowledge rather than point of view. Some people (libertarian included) just dont comprehend the fact that FED is the root of many if not all financial problems.
The reason why we aren't losing 500k jobs a month is because it would be mathematically impossible to continue at that rate. Bring that up next time! :)
Money spent by government comes from the productive people and projects. It is then spent on unproductive people and projects. This doesn't create jobs, it just moves them from positions of freedom and capitalism to control by the socialist government.
It might be more efficient if they just robbed us with guns. I am sure that it will become obvious to them at some point, then the velvet glove will come off.
you're right and you mark my words, if this all turns to shit and it is headed that way they will come for everything you've got. The new dealers took the gold from Americans, and they gave it up thinking they would get it back.. The gov't will empty 401ks this time, including the gold you possess.
Unemployment checks are the fastest way to create jobs-Nancy Pelosi
125,00 jobs lost this month over 3 million Americans lost jobs since stm bill
2010 more than 400,000 Americans gave up looking for work. Almost 1 million since Obama took office*Goverment Hiring is 2 to 1 over the private sector
8 people left the work force for each 1 created in pri sector
The average time needed to find a job rose to 35.2 weeks
I'm going on welfare, foodstamps and umemployment Oh Shit I'm white!
lv2surf 1 year ago
@lv2surf wait did nancy really say "Unemployment checks are the fastest way to create jobs?"
Jakearoo14 1 year ago
@Jakearoo14 How she ever got voted in is a miracle itself was she running against a retard, yep she said unemployment checks were the fastest way to create new jobs and when askedabout the new health bill she said well we will just have to see whats in it! What a ding bat Research it if you think Im pulling your legg you and me should have run were smarter and what is so wrong is just 4 seving 4 year term she gets her 186k + for life plus her blue ribbion health care CA please vote her out!
lv2surf 1 year ago
Derek Dzvirko
cokehorse 2 years ago
F#$% your free shit hippy! get a job!
joeevil 2 years ago
Free clove cigarettes! Liberate my little black crutches.
SpaceMoxie 2 years ago
Yeah... lets waste time talking about his wardrobe instead of shit that matters.
servedwithlemon 2 years ago
Economy sucks . . . jobs plan sucks . . . Obama sucks
VoxLibertari 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
everyone revolt don't pay your taxes or shut down the shops and business for a 5 days!!
we should call it the 5 day revolt against the royalties of the federal government!! On January 15 2010
Let them know who the real bosses of government are! spread the word.
Rangersarrow 2 years ago 2
Fox are part of the system
njedinjedi 2 years ago
Thinking of this stimulus package, Im reminded of my father in law's general advice: "When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging."
rbairos1 2 years ago
Does nick have any other clothes???
standj21 2 years ago 3
that's his super hero costume
takerdust 2 years ago
Nick forgot to mention Cap and trade, and VAT tax
samuils 2 years ago
Hard to get all of that in when you are only given enough time to make a few blurbs. The average American has the attention span of a gnat and the education of an 11 year old when it comes to politics and economics.
Agreed with the previous poster that Nick needs a wardrobe expansion. Possibly even with clothing that is not black.
AKlover 2 years ago
@AKlover I don't think red leather would be a wise idea, even if the economy gets better.
plasticjesus108 2 years ago
Red leather is never acceptable on a man, now on a hot woman it's great. Just saying if he is going to be the main face for the publication/organization perhaps a wardrobe person is called for.
As far as politics, social issues, economics, and journalism in general Reason is head and shoulders above the pack. It's tragic that Libertarianism is not acceptable to 95% of people and likely never will be. Move a healthy chunk of GOP voters away from Cop/Mil worship and you'll open the door.
AKlover 2 years ago 2
I have been reading, not just subscribing to, Reason for 20 years. One thing I don't do is read it with my guns, their chambers open waiting for the civil war to occur. Kooks give Libertarians a bad name. You night want to work on your presentation.
plasticjesus108 2 years ago
Because you can see I own a few guns via looking at my page you assume I am a kook? Way to stereotype! Can i safely assume you are are doper do not shower regularly since you seem to be a Libertarian?
AKlover 2 years ago
man, you're a self righteous dick. flippin' cosmotarians. no perspective. as always w/ libertarians, the perfect is the enemy of the good.
ransom147 2 years ago
Hayek and Friedman were heart surgeons where Keynesians are homeopaths: their pills are placebos so when the arteries clog, they're as good as useless.
fomastephanovitch 2 years ago 2
Most brilliant political move I have seen in along time is the "We saved _____ amount of jobs." Because you can't prove they did or didn't and it sounds like they did :(
benjaminbartholomew 2 years ago 3
I actually saved 20 lives on my way to work this morning by consciously making the decision to not run them over with my car. How many lives did you save today?
hrosemd 2 years ago 18
What a brilliant example. BTW I plan on stealing it and using it as much as possible! TY
benjaminbartholomew 2 years ago
About five.
Z14LDO 2 years ago
Whatever motovates Fox is fine with me so along as their audience continues to be introduced to the ideas of freedom.
InTheSticks1881 2 years ago 6
Does Gillespie only own one set of clothes? He wears the same thing every time he's interviewed....
TheAustrian08 2 years ago 5
Cavuto is a tool. Nick, aside from Napolitano, nobody at Fox actually gives a crap about you. They're just acting like your friend because they are in "bitch about Democrats" mode. Once Republicans get back in power, you'll still be saying the same thing and they'll treat you like you're a raving lunatic.
Don't pander to these guys. All they care about is their own agenda.
787Bisurdaddy 2 years ago 2
@787Bisurdaddy Agree, just look how many of them support war with Iran
chevydriver1123 2 years ago
@787Bisurdaddy All anyone ever cares about is their own agenda. No big surprise there. Who is pandering?? Can you turn off a vid, change a channel??
imrnlil 2 years ago
Who is pandering? It's obvious from my previous comment.
Fox only cares about "limited government" at the moment because of the Democratic majority in government. Fox doesn't ACTUALLY support the things that Nick talks about, they just pretend to in order to bitch about Democrats. Nick can't be stupid enough not to realize this; he's pandering to their agenda by coming on their shows just so he can get some exposure.
787Bisurdaddy 2 years ago
Now whether you think this pandering is a good or bad idea is another topic of discussion, but I would have to say that I think it's a bad idea. Fox is going to kick him to the curb when the Republicans become the majority again. Napolitano is the only person at Fox that actually says what he believes and has meaningful discussions with guests like Nick, and Fox limits him to a web show that nobody watches.
I just don't see any positive angle to Nick appearing on these TV shows.
787Bisurdaddy 2 years ago
@787Bisurdaddy
Fox News gets way more ratings than any of the other national news stations. Not only that but they are the only national news station that isn't liberal. So regardless of whether or not Fox News will "kick him to the curb" if he wants to get his message out there to even more viewers Fox is a great way to do it. If you can't see the advantage of Gillespie getting his point of view out to more people and i'll add, people that will listen to him, than you need to open your eyes.
blurbum9 1 year ago
Only national news station (I think you mean channel) that isn't liberal? What are you smoking? I guess you've never watched MSNBC before.
Not that it matters, because "liberal" and "conservative" when it comes to the media are meaningless terms. They're just distractions created to keep people from noticing the blatant corporatism.
Nick isn't getting his point out, there's not enough time. Instead, he's coming off as if he's just another Fox News parrot.
787Bisurdaddy 1 year ago
@787Bisurdaddy
I had put news "organization" but i ran out of space so i put station lol.. but MSNBC are you serious? They are the biggest liberals in the media.
Its funny how liberals or democrats don't see just how biased things have become. i guess maybe if you were on the other side you would have to notice. But in all seriousness, yes fox news is the only right leaning news national news station on tv. Olbermann, Maddow and Schultz all liberals all msnbc..
blurbum9 1 year ago
It's funny how you think I'm a liberal or a democrat, since I'm neither. Maybe you should stop examining things in such black and white terms.
787Bisurdaddy 1 year ago
@787Bisurdaddy
I can tell when i'm talking to a liberal or dem because they are always clueless.. Seriously if you didn't know MSNBC was a liberal news station then trust me your clueless.
lol black and white, i'm not a republican either i may lean towards the right but i'm still a libertarian.
Gillespie doesn't need Fox News anyways he has Reason Magazine and YouTube.
blurbum9 1 year ago
I was specifically thinking of Cramer when I made the statement; yes, MSNBC has it's "liberal" shills but fake liberalism is exactly that.
If you want to insist that I'm a liberal, I have no problem with that. After all, libertarianism embraces classical liberalism.
I'm not sure why you assumed I wasn't a libertarian, but I am. Actually, I prefer the term "anti-statist" because I'm not a minarchist.
787Bisurdaddy 1 year ago
"Gillespie doesn't need Fox News anyways"
That's exactly the point I was making in the first place.
787Bisurdaddy 1 year ago
Man, Fox is really taking a more libertarian point of view, aren't they? Glad they're bringing NIck into the fold, I suppose.
theneedledrop 2 years ago 2
@theneedledrop
My guess is that there's a growing market for libertarian ideas and Fox is responding like any self interested organization. Red Eye is a libertarian friendly show on Fox News and they have Nick Gillespie on quite often.
Thorbie 2 years ago
Thorbie The reason for libertarians being on Fox is also because when it comes to economy there is virtually no difference between conservatives and libertarians. (Please dont bring up Bush, he was conservative, like Im a fluffy kitten)
samuils 2 years ago
@samuils
While that tends to be the case, conservatives often don't go as far as libertarians do in terms of focusing on the importance of limited government on all fronts and I think few conservative commentators have made the case against the Fed and returning to the gold standard, as opposed to libertarians. In my opinion, specifically libertarian ideas are coming into fashion with the growing tea party movement and the past year's rise in sales of Atlas Shrugged. Just my view though.
Thorbie 2 years ago
Thorbie You are correct on the Fed, but I think that has to do more with knowledge rather than point of view. Some people (libertarian included) just dont comprehend the fact that FED is the root of many if not all financial problems.
samuils 2 years ago
Nick,
The reason why we aren't losing 500k jobs a month is because it would be mathematically impossible to continue at that rate. Bring that up next time! :)
strongbadXCP 2 years ago 4
Some of the stimulus is a slush fund of buying votes to pass the socialist bills in Congress.
oilhammer04 2 years ago 7
Money spent by government comes from the productive people and projects. It is then spent on unproductive people and projects. This doesn't create jobs, it just moves them from positions of freedom and capitalism to control by the socialist government.
XCritonX 2 years ago 14
@XCritonX It would be more honest of government agents stuck a gun in your back and marched you to an ATM.
arcanekrusader 2 years ago 7
Honesty from the government? Hahhahhahhah!
It might be more efficient if they just robbed us with guns. I am sure that it will become obvious to them at some point, then the velvet glove will come off.
Turns out the real Red Dawn comes from within!
XCritonX 2 years ago 5
you're right and you mark my words, if this all turns to shit and it is headed that way they will come for everything you've got. The new dealers took the gold from Americans, and they gave it up thinking they would get it back.. The gov't will empty 401ks this time, including the gold you possess.
imrnlil 2 years ago
Before they get my gold they have to take my lead.
XCritonX 2 years ago
Damn right.
MagnusIan 2 years ago
Great vid.
I'd like to see a lot more conversations between these guys.
Both are articulate Libertarian/Conservative advocates.
averagejoe040 2 years ago
Its good to see well spoken advocates of liberty holding their own on mainstream news outlets. Kudos Nick.
Knightmixer 2 years ago