hairyshitter - apart from loving that name i also agree with your point. but apple is the porsche of the computer world. their stuff just looks like you can do work faster. i use both pc and mac and linux. they're just a tool for getting what you need done at the end of the day.
I use all three systems myself, apple I specifically use for video editing/post processing, windows I use for general tasks, diagnostics, data logging, patching and play, linux is used for general tasks, file serving (FreeNAS), web serving (apache) and as a media centre (XBMC), and the best thing is now they can all co-exist and share files and resources with each other, I'd say use the best tool for the best.
The only negative I have to say about apple is hardware cost, essentially you are buying PC hardware at a heavy mark-up, I could understand before when they used PowerPC hardware, but the price doesn't justify the cost of components and chassy, you might argue R&D for the chassy design but as for the hardware its all pretty much standard equipment, maybe a 30-50% mark-up but some of the systems are well over the double mark for the same hardware.
my 12" PB boots leopard alot faster than that...hard drive speed also plays into it. Plus, OSX wasn't meant to run on a screen THAT small...i thought the 12" was small sheesh
What version of OSX are you running, Tiger is considerably faster then Leopard on PowerPC architecture, plus the Dell has a Solid State Disk installed.
The SSD has an impact on the loading times, but I think the kernel for Leopard and above have been optimised for Intel over PowerPC architecture. If Tiger was running on both machines then results might be different.
The powerbook is still a fairly capable computer for doing video editing and other tasks. The main thing wrong with apple is they charge too much for their hardware which is of a fairly standard specification.
hairyshitter - apart from loving that name i also agree with your point. but apple is the porsche of the computer world. their stuff just looks like you can do work faster. i use both pc and mac and linux. they're just a tool for getting what you need done at the end of the day.
jimjimthehumanbin 1 year ago 3
@jimjimthehumanbin
I use all three systems myself, apple I specifically use for video editing/post processing, windows I use for general tasks, diagnostics, data logging, patching and play, linux is used for general tasks, file serving (FreeNAS), web serving (apache) and as a media centre (XBMC), and the best thing is now they can all co-exist and share files and resources with each other, I'd say use the best tool for the best.
hairyshitter 1 year ago
The only negative I have to say about apple is hardware cost, essentially you are buying PC hardware at a heavy mark-up, I could understand before when they used PowerPC hardware, but the price doesn't justify the cost of components and chassy, you might argue R&D for the chassy design but as for the hardware its all pretty much standard equipment, maybe a 30-50% mark-up but some of the systems are well over the double mark for the same hardware.
hairyshitter 1 year ago
my 12" PB boots leopard alot faster than that...hard drive speed also plays into it. Plus, OSX wasn't meant to run on a screen THAT small...i thought the 12" was small sheesh
macuse2008 1 year ago
Why does the hacintosh load faster than the original Macintosh computer ? I like Apple's operating system but hate their computers.
gunthermeyer 1 year ago
@gunthermeyer Well the Netbook has a faster processor, more ram, and most importantly, an SSD drive.
Chintendoeddman 7 months ago
dude i got a 12¨powerbook g4 867 mhz. 1.12 ram and is not as slow as this one.
chumays 1 year ago
@chumays
What version of OSX are you running, Tiger is considerably faster then Leopard on PowerPC architecture, plus the Dell has a Solid State Disk installed.
hairyshitter 1 year ago
@hairyshitter
youre right dude its tiger, well now i know why it boots faster thanks, guess im sticking to tiger but really wanted to try gamesalad. n n
chumays 1 year ago
I think the boot time difference is based on the ssd
lovecrycrystal 1 year ago
@lovecrycrystal
The SSD has an impact on the loading times, but I think the kernel for Leopard and above have been optimised for Intel over PowerPC architecture. If Tiger was running on both machines then results might be different.
hairyshitter 1 year ago
lol that hackintosh beat that G4... yay intel CPU's
c0rrupts3ct0r555 1 year ago
The powerbook is still a fairly capable computer for doing video editing and other tasks. The main thing wrong with apple is they charge too much for their hardware which is of a fairly standard specification.
hairyshitter 2 years ago
Wasn't expecting anything more from the powerbook, still pretty neat looking computer!
Naousaios26 2 years ago