it looks like a church outing with christian rock music in the background.
this is americanised atheism. Atheism is not special, it doesnt need to be preached or put onto reality shows it is completely normal behaviour. This is like sending a nasty rapper hate-mail, or persuading your dealer to give up drugs - a waste of time, and hypocritical.
dont preach the absence of something. don't preach at all! As far as I'm concerned, the stupider they are the quicker they'll die out.
JESUS CHRIST, HIS CATHOLIC-UNIVERSAL-APOSTOLIC CHURCH, SACRAMENTS, THE BIBLE, MIRACLES, HEALINGS, ST. MARY APPARITIONS, MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN, SIGNS IN 2011 ARE NOT A MYTHOLOGY BUT THE REALITY !!!
When we all die, we won't see God. It'll either be all blackness or a god that nobody ever knew about. So Christians, maybe you've been worshiping the wrong god all these years. It's just better to not believe in anything than to find out you've been worshiping the wrong dude. Hopefully this god isn't the jealous type Christians.
Wow.... That last comment was funny. I have to go to the "bull shit" museum tomorrow, so I figured I'd watch a video or two about it before I get drug in there...
I actually think this is wrong. Creationism shouldn't be tolerated, it should be ridiculed and rejected at every opportunity. I couldn't give a rats ass what people believe. Facts are facts, truth is truth and to spread such idiotic, misguided and misinformed lies is a crime.
It's shameful, Atheist or not, that people would come with such a disrespectful attitude towards other's beliefs. I think that is the main problem with Atheism... I've never met one who is respectful to someone who has any kind of faith.
@AHundredButterflies Ah... so not only are you an Atheist, but by your statement you are also admittedly a fascist. Sorry, but I'm pretty sure Atheism does not include a complete lack of morality.
@SuperDZproductions If you can name one significant area of your life which needs you to approach it using "faith" I'm all ears. Such compromises to reasoning won't bode well for anyone which is why if you could name one thing (which you can't) I'll stop believing it...
@AHundredButterflies Is not faith the same as trust? I can name a million instances in life where you must put your trust in something or someone. Do you have children? Do you put your faith in the school system to educate them to a certain degree? Simple reasoning can logically dictate the fact that a degree of faith is a part of everyone's life. But that isn't even what I was originally saying. Respect others. Very simple creed.
@SuperDZproductions Trust by definition is: a firm belief in the demonstrable reliability of someone or something. So that debunks your argument about it being "the same" as faith and the validity of your hypothetical situation, I wouldn't have "faith". Once employed the school system has an obligation to be inclusive of all children and that includes education. Your intellectual shortcomings are nice correspondence as to why you are an ignorant theist. Now go pray to your imaginary friend.
@AHundredButterflies As usual. The angry and short tempered Atheist ends his rant with an ignorant quip and further makes himself and his chosen philosophy appear to be the product of nothing more than a product of an impatient and undisciplined mind. Your assumptions provide a good look into exactly how your mind reacts to intelligent process. Your statement on education was moot and completely off topic. No connection to what I said.
@AHundredButterflies -continued... Assuming I am a theist is hilarious and only provided you with what you craved the most... The opportunity for a quick little quip at the end of a sentence. The escape route that most uneducated Atheists need when backed into a corner and don't have the intellectual clout to actually -speak- their way out of conversation. Thanks for the entertainment. Someday I hope for a real discussion on this topic with someone who can actually read.
@SuperDZproductions I am amused as to how you falsely associate "a million" things to "faith" only for me to debunk your only example so far and if I quote correctly "Such compromises to reasoning won't bode well for anyone which is why if you could name one thing (which you can't) I'll stop believing it..." that is the nature of a rational mind. You shouldn't/cannot base anything on faith. I will get to that later but first I made the assumption you were a theist because of how you...
@SuperDZproductions pathetically claim to be able to associate "a million" things with "faith" that carry significant value. Only a theist with an I.Q consisting of a single digit would make such an assertion. Burden of proof is on you to back that claim with tangible evidence which so far has not been met. Now time to administer the coup de grace on this argument I haven't got all day. Previously I mentioned how you cannot base anything on faith well here is why...
@SuperDZproductions Because there is no apparent evidence for the existence of God you have to look at it in terms of probability.
1 represents the number of ways in which theists claim the Universe came to be, that "God/s did it!".
Infinity represents the number of incomprehensible and comprehensible ways in which the Universe came to be.
1/Infinity = 0 for all practical purposes and as you may know 0 in terms of probability is an impossibility. I don't even study Mathematics yet I know this
@AHundredButterflies Who cares? Respect other people's beliefs. It's a common principal. Obviously only a fascist would support otherwise. That was my main point. You eluded that point and went on to a bunch of pointless rambling. Have fun with your life.
@SuperDZproductions It is not fascism if science has contradictory evidence to the popular belief, that is the difference between fact and opinion. Facts are indisputable. Why would I want to respect someone's faith that warrants monstrosities? Whilst the whole time parading as humility? Asserting that if you don't do the same you will doomed to an afterlife of eternal torment? On a side note, how do you expect me to argue if I don't reply?... and you have yet...
@AHundredButterflies In your arrogance, you succeeded only in turning a statement about respecting others beliefs into an argument of Creationism vs. Atheism. Bravo for staying on topic. I applaud your attention span. You are fascist because in this country we are given the freedom to worship or believe as we please. If you actually believe (as you said you do) that people should be denied this right, then perhaps you should try voicing your opinions in another country.
@SuperDZproductions At what point did I get anywhere near insinuating that people be deprived of this right? What I did imply was that in no area of life, of civilization, is abandoning reasoning for faith a viable solution. Yet religion demands this compromise of logic and because there is not a scrap of evidence you look at it in terms of probability. Why? Because there is no logical pathway that suggests; because we have no grasp on the workings of a certain thing/s, this must be true...
@SuperDZproductions yet religion does this. So in the absence of evidence and a probability comprising of 0, an impossibility, when approached with a skeptical mind as you would anything religion falls apart. Yet your asking me to regard it with respect? Especially after taking into account the monstrosities it is accountable for, the worst of which in my opinion is the close-mindedness of generations and the oppression of free-thinking, and the hate it incites? I am sorry, but for me to grant..
@SuperDZproductions you any kind of respect is to give you a platform. On par with doing the same to known pedophiles to which no person with any kind of grasp on morality has no intention. Good day to you.
@AHundredButterflies Man... you do love to ramble on don't you? Perhaps you should donate your time to something more productive like spreading your fascist views on another video. I am finished with your lack of focus.
@SuperDZproductions Such pathetic rebuttals saturated in woeful ignorance. I'll tell you what I'll give you another shot at pulling your argument from beneath the rubble and presenting it to me. I can safely say, with no sense of egotism whatsoever, it's over for you.
@SuperDZproductions By the way, the use of ellipsis doesn't warrant the use of capital letters. Your illiterate use of punctuation only exemplifies what I said about your... intellectual shortcomings. I think that warrants a high-five. I did it again! UNBE-FUCKING-LIEVEABLE!
@AHundredButterflies Once again, more rambling. Nothing exemplified other than your continued need to rant. You missed the point completely. I won't reply anymore, but I highly doubt your insatiable need to have the last word will allow you to do the same. Goodnight.
Fortunatley..we have magnificent TRUE science museums! it's really just a matter of choice to be ignorant willfully I geuss..but what a farce! They spent the money to build it and that's their right, but they are making children ignorant and it's a shame.
I wonder how many kids they could have fed with the money that went into this museum. Hell, even spending that money on science books would have been better!
It's nice that they can be light-hearted about it, but in all reality, the existence of this place should be a crime. Yes I know, free-speech and so forth - but taking children to this "museum" as a form of their education (indoctrination) should be considered contributing to the delinquency of minors.
It makes me seriously depressed, because I actually believe in the potential of humanity, and shit like this is like a ball and chain making forward momentum exceedingly difficult.
This is absolute shit and it's disappointing that people believe it. What else is so insulting is that the "museum" people discredit and put down brilliant scientists and paleontologists who discovered dinosaurs decades before technology. They say that they were atheists therefore they shouldnt be acknowledged, but Creationists back then were scrutinized by scientists bc they were Christians and told the truth. Uh no, they were criticized bc they were idiots and preaching this bullshit!
I don't understand at ALL the comparison between Descartes's "I think therefor I am" and God's "I am that I am". The former was Descartes's conclusion that he could be absolutely certain that he was thinking, and latter was God stating that he was uncased. The two have nothing to do with one another and aren't alike in any way.
@standinstann Sounds like the creationists are saying 1) "Don't think for yourself, just accept this" and 2) "Quit being so self-centered". I remember the commercials in the 70s that ended with "A mind is a terrible thing to waste", and this museum is the disposal unit.
@toAdmiller I am just so sick of these people quoting great philosophers without knowing anything about what they were saying. They seem to think that people like Renee Descartes and Thomas Aquinas were just spitting out catch phrases. Renee Descartes and Thomas Aquinas were some of the most brilliant minds in human history and they deserve better than to be a blurb in there little dogma diagram.
Surely the title is wrong. "Skeptic" implies that Creationism is somehow the accepted view, which is crazy - it isn't. Why bother to even debate....Would you try a reasoned debate with somebody who said the Earth was flat? Ideas like this do not deserve respect or consideration or discussion - it just gives them credibilty they don't deserve.
@novadrian That's true in the scientific community. But here in America, in the common community, to be a "skeptic" is a minority and to be a creationist puts one amongst around 40% of the population and being a christian about 80%. The sad truth is most people are stupid.
@philster611 Yes, science is actually based up from multiple independent sources of evidence which when researched all point to the same picture of what happened.
There is no reason to rely on only one piece of evidence so that any errors in method or equipment can be picked up on.
I can only imagine the cloak of stupidity as a Human approaches this dehumanizing house of lies, death, oppression and misinformation. It is a pillar of subhumanity.
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
@sebc2s it is not idiocy. it is the Truth! you want idiocy go talk to stephen hawkings or go to a science museum that promotes evolution and bilions of years thats idiocy. its ignorance.
And listen to the "strained confusion" where they are working overtime to misunderstand. If these people are trying to convince anyone of anything, they are convincing me they cannot even get a story straight before they cross-examine it. Wow.
Do these people realize that Isaac Newton, James Clerk Maxwell, Blaise Pascal, Galileo, Michael Faraday, Louis Pasteur and many other founding fathers of science were EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS? These people have the most absurd notion of what evangelicals believe that they haven't a clue as to what they are criticizing. Never mind that scientists from Montana State found heme in red cells from Suzy the T-Rex. They aren't going to change their belief system just because some evidence came along.
@357MagnumBob "Do these people realize that Isaac Newton, James Clerk Maxwell, Blaise Pascal, Galileo, Michael Faraday, Louis Pasteur and many other founding fathers of science were EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS? "
Actually Galileo was imprisoned by the Catholic Church( he was NOT an evangelical Christian) because he knew that the sun was the center of our galaxy. so he had already challenged the religious authority. Galileo is regarded as the father of modern science BTW...
These Atheists are even lamer than the museum itselt. I hate how they put tons of buttons on their clothing to make it clear to everyone "duurrrrr I'm an Atheist alright!"
I can't help wondering why people announce that they are an athiest as though it was somekind of achievement. Its just another belief. It doesn't take any effort at all. On that note, is creationism really Christian? Jesus never mentioned it once. Not ever. At least not in the Bible. Mocking people's faith, oh what fun, lol.
@uknowispeaksense yes thats what I said! The belief that God does not exist, so there Mr Facepalm. Wow you guys are a bunch of pretentious psuedo intellectual nitwits. Putting everyone down, for everything, will not replace your self esteem, or the lunch money that the bigger kids took from you while you were in school.
@DarthTroller I know its just a few words but atheism is by definition a non-belief. There is a difference and it is important because "belief" suggests faith. Its funny that you, a theist, thinks I have a self esteem problem. I don't need to invent an imaginary overseer to guide my insecure little mind. Oh, I also made my own lunch. Even from a very young age I was in control of my own destiny.
@uknowispeaksense Atheism is by definition the belief that there is no God. The denial of God is a belief! I could be wrong about your self esteem, though its been my observation that most pseudo intellectuals who have to mock others to feel good about themselves, usually are compensating for low self esteem. You think I'm a theist? Oh how presumptuous you are, lol! So sad that you will never know the joys of objective thinking, lol!
@DarthTroller No, I figured you for a troll before I noticed your moniker and I know figured you probably weren't a theist. You're nowhere near rampant enough and you type very succinctly. I don't consider myself a pseudo intellectual but just someone who is passionate about stamping out scientific illiteracy. I know the raving creationists are hard nuts to crack but I've got to start somewhere. Nice chatting with you. Take it easy.
@DarthTroller To deny the existance for a god is based on a lack of evidence for such beings. Therfore how ca it be a belief in the religous use of the term?
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that undirected natural laws can bring about an airplane or a living cell. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all its is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
Nope; attempting to understand religion in terms of world sociology and history, and/or studying it from an objective approach is fine, even interesting. It's when you start to believe in it that you might as well start hitting the pipe...bitemyass
@jerico641 ...Whats worst is when you spend all your time getting angry and emotional about something you don't believe exists. Posting comments and trolling channels....LOL...#wackotrolls
@jerico641 ...Whats worst is when you spend all your time getting angry and emotional about something you don't believe exists. Posting comments and trolling channels LMAO #wackotrolls
2:22 ah yes,humans and dinosaurs.Remember that time in the bible,where jesus enters the city on top of a t-rex? and then he unleashed him on the pharisees,because they thought dinosaurs did not exist at that time,and then an apostle of jesus ,i think it was Tomas, said "HOLY SHIT.A dinosaur from the triassic period"
I agree with what the atheists are doing here, but what a piss poor representation - a bunch of pierced, tattooed, ill spoken degenerates. There are much better people to have doing this imo.
Makes me sad for this country. We're so far behind in intellect it's just embarrassing. Seeing these brainwashed, sad people shuffle along and soak up this unscientific dreck is depressing.
@rmaynard626 If God regrets man's poor choices, then it must logically follow that He regrets the design of man that enabled man to make such poor choices. Since He is the designer, He, Himself regrets his own creation... kind of a weak God eh?
@Radetzky19 Would your parents regret having you as their child, based upon poor choices that you may have made? You don't disassociate from someone you truly love, based upon poor decision making. Stop thinking like a borg, and think it terms of HUMAN BEINGS in a loving parental relationship.
@rmaynard626 You automatically assume that no parent regrets having children. It is a logical fallacy. Unfortunately there are some cases in which that occurs even though you may find it ideal that instances of that do not happen at all. It is also besides the point. I'm not acting like a borg, I'm using logic that you seem not to like but too bad that's reality.
@Radetzky19 You are referring to multiple instances where that could be the case. I'm asking you (a singular instance) would your parents regret having you? As a parent, the answer is NO, because the love that you have for your child greatly outweighs anything that child could say or do. Its not that I don't recognize logic, I just don't see it in this instance.
@rmaynard626 You are missing the point. Your analogy is fallacious because you are using that parent analogy to reflect your God's "love" or whatever you are trying to prove. It's not the same, esp when your God has attributes such as omnipotence and "omni-benevolence". If you say your God regrets the poor choices men make (another question arises what is considered "poor" cause there is no objective of morality), then he himself is also at fault..thats how logic works.
@rmaynard626 I know you are trying to counter me saying that God regrets HOW He designed his own creation, is like saying my parents regret having me. This is not a proper analogy. First of all my parents can only fornicate me. Your god, however, "designs" each and every one of us so more of our capabilities are in "His control". You still automatically assume all parents are all loving of their children which is not the case.
@rmaynard626 3) LOL you cannot ask me of a "singular instance" of my parents regretting for having me when you come up with an answer of NO due to ASSUMING that everyone's "thoughts of how they view their children as a parent" are the same as yours. FALLACY. You failed at asking the correct question. Anyway, parents are mortal human beings only capable of fornicating offspring and have no say in how the baby is predestined by your God. However, you God knowing the future and being
@rmaynard626 4) all powerful ceases to change anything even though he knows the exact "poor choices" a certain human is going to make even though he is all powerful and supposedly all good. It does not make sense. With those characteristics attributed to such a being, it logically follows that he must regret how designs everyone in certain ways since he is the "grand designer" and can choose to not regret anything and make sure a being does not make those "poor choices".
@Radetzky19 Again, you're trying to rationalize God's decision, which are based in love. Love does necessarily take a logical approach, because a major component to love is free will from both sides.
@rmaynard626 Yes it is important to rationalize another person's actions. that's the way of the world. so why aren't you? You try to make it about love but I just proved the opposite. At this point, you writing only a few sentences after me breaking down to you the problem in 5 paragraphs is very menial and ignorant on your part. You have yet to give me something that you are trying to argue for.
@rmaynard626 2) an omnipotent and all loving God would not regret a man's "poor decisions". 1) because He is all powerful he can easily never make Himself regret (esp since he is supposed to never make mistakes). 2) if he is all loving he would not dare jeopardize the possibility of a man making poor decisions, for it is a reflection on He as the creator as well as He being the "caretaker" of man. If your God regrets, then He made a mistake CASE CLOSED
A commentary on an other video made me think about this, people leading this museum are merchants. They are merchants of religion. They're are the same kind of merchants that their own god, Jesus, kicked away from the temple.
What makes me sad is that creationnists have done it. They made talk about themselves, about their ideas, they built a pseudo-museum and have reached their goal : make money. Not even Christians come into this museum but also atheists and agnostics. And the more we'll talk about them, the more publicity they'll have and the more money they'll earn.
Personally I feel weird when people say they were X years religious. Like membership duration actually mattered. Quantity not quality. It is hard to stop myself from asking questions like. Did you talk to theologians before you made your decision? -Often not- and so, how "believing" were you, if you just slipped through the cracks without even addressing the questions past a theologian? I wonder how they lived their lives as "christians" often i ask. Where you involved in charity work+giving?
"how do you know the bible is true" is like saying "how do you know your birth certificate is true". The issue of "True or False" Is not easily tossed on to a document. As if a typographical error on your birth certificate automatically proves everything else is false (or w/e).
Also, the bible is a library of multiple books. Does anyone actually go to a library and as " how do you know if this library is true". as you can see- it does not even work right if you ask it that way.
When you have the childish explanation of "god did it" you don't need evidence or reality. And clearly, "god did it" is the ONLY explanation that the creation "museum" needs.
Some of my wife's relatives from Kentucky are visiting us this week. They live relatively close to this place, and while they are pretty blue-collar individuals, they're not particularly religious. So far I haven't asked them about the place or if they've ever been there (they have daughters and grand kids), but I'm dying to.
Comment removed
TasteOfVengeance5 6 days ago
9:36 Best of pals
TasteOfVengeance5 6 days ago
Like WHY would you VOLUNTARILY go to that place!
TheFrizzyfreak 2 weeks ago
@TheFrizzyfreak I'd go. I'd laugh my head off.
zeldaofarel 1 week ago
WHY WOULD YOU PUT YOURSELF THROUGH THAT!
TheFrizzyfreak 2 weeks ago
it looks like a church outing with christian rock music in the background.
this is americanised atheism. Atheism is not special, it doesnt need to be preached or put onto reality shows it is completely normal behaviour. This is like sending a nasty rapper hate-mail, or persuading your dealer to give up drugs - a waste of time, and hypocritical.
dont preach the absence of something. don't preach at all! As far as I'm concerned, the stupider they are the quicker they'll die out.
DanzaBarr1 2 weeks ago
HA!! At 5:10 the bald guy, " i dont go the science rout". You mean like when they fixed your hand lol!!
gotnatas 3 weeks ago
lol 5:12 It looks like that guy trusted Christ to make sure his hand didn't get hurt O.o
b33p3rz 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
JESUS CHRIST, HIS CATHOLIC-UNIVERSAL-APOSTOLIC CHURCH, SACRAMENTS, THE BIBLE, MIRACLES, HEALINGS, ST. MARY APPARITIONS, MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN, SIGNS IN 2011 ARE NOT A MYTHOLOGY BUT THE REALITY !!!
GET READY FOR THE GREAT WARNING NOW!!!
thewarningsecondcoming . com
JezusSlave 4 weeks ago
When we all die, we won't see God. It'll either be all blackness or a god that nobody ever knew about. So Christians, maybe you've been worshiping the wrong god all these years. It's just better to not believe in anything than to find out you've been worshiping the wrong dude. Hopefully this god isn't the jealous type Christians.
XxI3ioHazardxX 1 month ago
Wow.... That last comment was funny. I have to go to the "bull shit" museum tomorrow, so I figured I'd watch a video or two about it before I get drug in there...
thisistommy662 1 month ago
I actually think this is wrong. Creationism shouldn't be tolerated, it should be ridiculed and rejected at every opportunity. I couldn't give a rats ass what people believe. Facts are facts, truth is truth and to spread such idiotic, misguided and misinformed lies is a crime.
jameslondon74 1 month ago
The huge claws, talons, and teeth are just in case the plants try to make a fast get-away.
LOGICandREAS0N 1 month ago
i grew up in a christian household, i never was a creationist, thanks to bbc prehistory series and fascination with prehistoric life, i knew better
ContextofSalad58 1 month ago
It's shameful, Atheist or not, that people would come with such a disrespectful attitude towards other's beliefs. I think that is the main problem with Atheism... I've never met one who is respectful to someone who has any kind of faith.
SuperDZproductions 1 month ago
@SuperDZproductions Mainly because faith by definition is: belief in things without evidence. Such idiocy doesn't deserve any "respect".
AHundredButterflies 1 month ago
@AHundredButterflies Ah... so not only are you an Atheist, but by your statement you are also admittedly a fascist. Sorry, but I'm pretty sure Atheism does not include a complete lack of morality.
SuperDZproductions 1 month ago
@SuperDZproductions If you can name one significant area of your life which needs you to approach it using "faith" I'm all ears. Such compromises to reasoning won't bode well for anyone which is why if you could name one thing (which you can't) I'll stop believing it...
AHundredButterflies 1 month ago
@AHundredButterflies Is not faith the same as trust? I can name a million instances in life where you must put your trust in something or someone. Do you have children? Do you put your faith in the school system to educate them to a certain degree? Simple reasoning can logically dictate the fact that a degree of faith is a part of everyone's life. But that isn't even what I was originally saying. Respect others. Very simple creed.
SuperDZproductions 1 month ago
@SuperDZproductions Trust by definition is: a firm belief in the demonstrable reliability of someone or something. So that debunks your argument about it being "the same" as faith and the validity of your hypothetical situation, I wouldn't have "faith". Once employed the school system has an obligation to be inclusive of all children and that includes education. Your intellectual shortcomings are nice correspondence as to why you are an ignorant theist. Now go pray to your imaginary friend.
AHundredButterflies 1 month ago
@AHundredButterflies As usual. The angry and short tempered Atheist ends his rant with an ignorant quip and further makes himself and his chosen philosophy appear to be the product of nothing more than a product of an impatient and undisciplined mind. Your assumptions provide a good look into exactly how your mind reacts to intelligent process. Your statement on education was moot and completely off topic. No connection to what I said.
SuperDZproductions 1 month ago
@AHundredButterflies -continued... Assuming I am a theist is hilarious and only provided you with what you craved the most... The opportunity for a quick little quip at the end of a sentence. The escape route that most uneducated Atheists need when backed into a corner and don't have the intellectual clout to actually -speak- their way out of conversation. Thanks for the entertainment. Someday I hope for a real discussion on this topic with someone who can actually read.
SuperDZproductions 1 month ago
@SuperDZproductions I am amused as to how you falsely associate "a million" things to "faith" only for me to debunk your only example so far and if I quote correctly "Such compromises to reasoning won't bode well for anyone which is why if you could name one thing (which you can't) I'll stop believing it..." that is the nature of a rational mind. You shouldn't/cannot base anything on faith. I will get to that later but first I made the assumption you were a theist because of how you...
AHundredButterflies 1 month ago
@SuperDZproductions pathetically claim to be able to associate "a million" things with "faith" that carry significant value. Only a theist with an I.Q consisting of a single digit would make such an assertion. Burden of proof is on you to back that claim with tangible evidence which so far has not been met. Now time to administer the coup de grace on this argument I haven't got all day. Previously I mentioned how you cannot base anything on faith well here is why...
AHundredButterflies 1 month ago
@SuperDZproductions Because there is no apparent evidence for the existence of God you have to look at it in terms of probability.
1 represents the number of ways in which theists claim the Universe came to be, that "God/s did it!".
Infinity represents the number of incomprehensible and comprehensible ways in which the Universe came to be.
1/Infinity = 0 for all practical purposes and as you may know 0 in terms of probability is an impossibility. I don't even study Mathematics yet I know this
AHundredButterflies 1 month ago
@AHundredButterflies could have came to be*
AHundredButterflies 1 month ago
@AHundredButterflies Who cares? Respect other people's beliefs. It's a common principal. Obviously only a fascist would support otherwise. That was my main point. You eluded that point and went on to a bunch of pointless rambling. Have fun with your life.
SuperDZproductions 1 month ago
@SuperDZproductions It is not fascism if science has contradictory evidence to the popular belief, that is the difference between fact and opinion. Facts are indisputable. Why would I want to respect someone's faith that warrants monstrosities? Whilst the whole time parading as humility? Asserting that if you don't do the same you will doomed to an afterlife of eternal torment? On a side note, how do you expect me to argue if I don't reply?... and you have yet...
AHundredButterflies 1 month ago
@AHundredButterflies be*
AHundredButterflies 1 month ago
@SuperDZproductions to come up with any kind of example highlighting an area of people's lives that require faith. Little clue, there isn't.
AHundredButterflies 1 month ago
@AHundredButterflies In your arrogance, you succeeded only in turning a statement about respecting others beliefs into an argument of Creationism vs. Atheism. Bravo for staying on topic. I applaud your attention span. You are fascist because in this country we are given the freedom to worship or believe as we please. If you actually believe (as you said you do) that people should be denied this right, then perhaps you should try voicing your opinions in another country.
SuperDZproductions 1 month ago
@SuperDZproductions At what point did I get anywhere near insinuating that people be deprived of this right? What I did imply was that in no area of life, of civilization, is abandoning reasoning for faith a viable solution. Yet religion demands this compromise of logic and because there is not a scrap of evidence you look at it in terms of probability. Why? Because there is no logical pathway that suggests; because we have no grasp on the workings of a certain thing/s, this must be true...
AHundredButterflies 1 month ago
@SuperDZproductions yet religion does this. So in the absence of evidence and a probability comprising of 0, an impossibility, when approached with a skeptical mind as you would anything religion falls apart. Yet your asking me to regard it with respect? Especially after taking into account the monstrosities it is accountable for, the worst of which in my opinion is the close-mindedness of generations and the oppression of free-thinking, and the hate it incites? I am sorry, but for me to grant..
AHundredButterflies 1 month ago
@SuperDZproductions you any kind of respect is to give you a platform. On par with doing the same to known pedophiles to which no person with any kind of grasp on morality has no intention. Good day to you.
AHundredButterflies 1 month ago
@AHundredButterflies Man... you do love to ramble on don't you? Perhaps you should donate your time to something more productive like spreading your fascist views on another video. I am finished with your lack of focus.
SuperDZproductions 1 month ago
@SuperDZproductions Such pathetic rebuttals saturated in woeful ignorance. I'll tell you what I'll give you another shot at pulling your argument from beneath the rubble and presenting it to me. I can safely say, with no sense of egotism whatsoever, it's over for you.
AHundredButterflies 1 month ago
@AHundredButterflies Boring.
SuperDZproductions 1 month ago
@SuperDZproductions By the way, the use of ellipsis doesn't warrant the use of capital letters. Your illiterate use of punctuation only exemplifies what I said about your... intellectual shortcomings. I think that warrants a high-five. I did it again! UNBE-FUCKING-LIEVEABLE!
AHundredButterflies 1 month ago
@AHundredButterflies Once again, more rambling. Nothing exemplified other than your continued need to rant. You missed the point completely. I won't reply anymore, but I highly doubt your insatiable need to have the last word will allow you to do the same. Goodnight.
SuperDZproductions 1 month ago
Holy shit, is that timeline trying to claim that the world was created 6,000 years ago? It is complete idiocy if that is the case.
bobbycathey 1 month ago
The girl at 7:40 looks beautiful, btw, What a shame
PatrixCR 1 month ago
@PatrixCR She looked like Natalie Portman
Astorianadventurer 1 month ago
Or maybe in time this will be a "Museum of Human gullibility"
flioink 2 months ago
I am enjoying every bit of this! I wish I went went them...looks lie a good ol time
mjbailey25 2 months ago
Fortunatley..we have magnificent TRUE science museums! it's really just a matter of choice to be ignorant willfully I geuss..but what a farce! They spent the money to build it and that's their right, but they are making children ignorant and it's a shame.
Lennon4ever1 2 months ago
I wonder how many kids they could have fed with the money that went into this museum. Hell, even spending that money on science books would have been better!
TheHobbsicle 2 months ago
in the beginning there was Scuttlebutton by Stevie Ray Vaaauuuughn haha
smooshmagoosh 2 months ago
At 6:45--IS THAT MEL BROOKS?
grumpyotter 2 months ago
It's nice that they can be light-hearted about it, but in all reality, the existence of this place should be a crime. Yes I know, free-speech and so forth - but taking children to this "museum" as a form of their education (indoctrination) should be considered contributing to the delinquency of minors.
It makes me seriously depressed, because I actually believe in the potential of humanity, and shit like this is like a ball and chain making forward momentum exceedingly difficult.
TheWanderingPrimate 2 months ago 8
Let them make fools of themselves for future generations to laugh about.
tkathryyn 2 months ago
I wish I was there
shaneanthonypitts 2 months ago
This is absolute shit and it's disappointing that people believe it. What else is so insulting is that the "museum" people discredit and put down brilliant scientists and paleontologists who discovered dinosaurs decades before technology. They say that they were atheists therefore they shouldnt be acknowledged, but Creationists back then were scrutinized by scientists bc they were Christians and told the truth. Uh no, they were criticized bc they were idiots and preaching this bullshit!
8azile8 2 months ago
obviously its in kentucky (shake head)
tryhard117 3 months ago
I hope they snuk in without paying.
leffehoegaarden 3 months ago
I don't understand at ALL the comparison between Descartes's "I think therefor I am" and God's "I am that I am". The former was Descartes's conclusion that he could be absolutely certain that he was thinking, and latter was God stating that he was uncased. The two have nothing to do with one another and aren't alike in any way.
standinstann 3 months ago
@standinstann Sounds like the creationists are saying 1) "Don't think for yourself, just accept this" and 2) "Quit being so self-centered". I remember the commercials in the 70s that ended with "A mind is a terrible thing to waste", and this museum is the disposal unit.
toAdmiller 2 months ago 2
@toAdmiller I am just so sick of these people quoting great philosophers without knowing anything about what they were saying. They seem to think that people like Renee Descartes and Thomas Aquinas were just spitting out catch phrases. Renee Descartes and Thomas Aquinas were some of the most brilliant minds in human history and they deserve better than to be a blurb in there little dogma diagram.
standinstann 2 months ago
@standinstann Agreed.
toAdmiller 2 months ago
Loving the Stevie Ray Vaughan
deanosumo 3 months ago
Of course Science will prevail over religious thought in the long run.
mbagouty69 3 months ago
@mbagouty69 Why is it either/or?
stallion4life 3 months ago
WOw sorry to say but it is hardcore how retarded that old guy is. It's a shame.
Sincerely from Hungary
sujoms 3 months ago
wait a minute the creation museum get grants from the gvernment thats unconstitutional seperation of church and state
thearbiter221 3 months ago
creation museum : where education has a completely different meaning
Samura1gamer 3 months ago
@7:45 Natalie Portman look-alike. Brains and beauty, I think I'm in love :')
VC106893 3 months ago
Its a CHURCH,not a museum!
kafkazinho 3 months ago in playlist Liked
Surely the title is wrong. "Skeptic" implies that Creationism is somehow the accepted view, which is crazy - it isn't. Why bother to even debate....Would you try a reasoned debate with somebody who said the Earth was flat? Ideas like this do not deserve respect or consideration or discussion - it just gives them credibilty they don't deserve.
novadrian 3 months ago
@novadrian That's true in the scientific community. But here in America, in the common community, to be a "skeptic" is a minority and to be a creationist puts one amongst around 40% of the population and being a christian about 80%. The sad truth is most people are stupid.
haohyou12 3 months ago
4.26. "How do you know the bible is true? " How do you know evolution is true? ...
Its called evidence..........Evolution has literally mountains of evidence.....The Bible can hardly stand up to basic scrutiny...
philster611 3 months ago 11
@philster611 Yes, science is actually based up from multiple independent sources of evidence which when researched all point to the same picture of what happened.
There is no reason to rely on only one piece of evidence so that any errors in method or equipment can be picked up on.
<3 science.
MeakerSE 2 weeks ago
they kicked me out for laughing at the exibit at 2:25
CallmeAffiliated 3 months ago
I can only imagine the cloak of stupidity as a Human approaches this dehumanizing house of lies, death, oppression and misinformation. It is a pillar of subhumanity.
699backstab 3 months ago 2
Was August E. Brunsman going through puberty before our very eyes?
CaptainAwesomeoh13 3 months ago
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 3 months ago
i like how most of the people there go for the lulz
PUSPUSinthaBUSHBUSH 3 months ago
They should change the name to the Flintstones Museum
metaldave08096 3 months ago 25
@metaldave08096 Yabbadabbadoo!!!
ghm011301 3 months ago
@metaldave08096 Yes.
LOGICandREAS0N 1 month ago
Every time I see the Creation Museum, I am always astounded at how much time, work and MONEY, was put into propagating such idiocy.
sebc2s 3 months ago 43
@sebc2s it is not idiocy. it is the Truth! you want idiocy go talk to stephen hawkings or go to a science museum that promotes evolution and bilions of years thats idiocy. its ignorance.
OddDude21 1 month ago
@sebc2s well it is a business
mauriciohavok 1 month ago
whats that awesome song?! :D great vid otherwise
Jaskarsis 4 months ago
And listen to the "strained confusion" where they are working overtime to misunderstand. If these people are trying to convince anyone of anything, they are convincing me they cannot even get a story straight before they cross-examine it. Wow.
357MagnumBob 4 months ago
Do these people realize that Isaac Newton, James Clerk Maxwell, Blaise Pascal, Galileo, Michael Faraday, Louis Pasteur and many other founding fathers of science were EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS? These people have the most absurd notion of what evangelicals believe that they haven't a clue as to what they are criticizing. Never mind that scientists from Montana State found heme in red cells from Suzy the T-Rex. They aren't going to change their belief system just because some evidence came along.
357MagnumBob 4 months ago
@357MagnumBob "Do these people realize that Isaac Newton, James Clerk Maxwell, Blaise Pascal, Galileo, Michael Faraday, Louis Pasteur and many other founding fathers of science were EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS? "
Actually Galileo was imprisoned by the Catholic Church( he was NOT an evangelical Christian) because he knew that the sun was the center of our galaxy. so he had already challenged the religious authority. Galileo is regarded as the father of modern science BTW...
philster611 3 months ago
@philster611~ U clearly dont know the history of the Catholic church!
The Catholic church killed Christians for being Christians!!!
marek0086 3 months ago
@357MagnumBob isaac newton also believed in alchemy.
numbersCH31vs17 1 month ago
loved the ending in the first part.
TonPappa 4 months ago
It takes a rational mind to be an atheist.
Against logic there is no armor like ignorance.
Laurence J. Peter
4r7f3e 4 months ago
Comment removed
4r7f3e 4 months ago
if adam named every species, why do we discover thousands every year?
kelbykross1 4 months ago
These Atheists are even lamer than the museum itselt. I hate how they put tons of buttons on their clothing to make it clear to everyone "duurrrrr I'm an Atheist alright!"
RappelKarton 4 months ago
I can't help wondering why people announce that they are an athiest as though it was somekind of achievement. Its just another belief. It doesn't take any effort at all. On that note, is creationism really Christian? Jesus never mentioned it once. Not ever. At least not in the Bible. Mocking people's faith, oh what fun, lol.
DarthTroller 4 months ago
@DarthTroller ummmmmm atheism=belief? facepalm
uknowispeaksense 4 months ago
@uknowispeaksense yes thats what I said! The belief that God does not exist, so there Mr Facepalm. Wow you guys are a bunch of pretentious psuedo intellectual nitwits. Putting everyone down, for everything, will not replace your self esteem, or the lunch money that the bigger kids took from you while you were in school.
DarthTroller 4 months ago
@DarthTroller I know its just a few words but atheism is by definition a non-belief. There is a difference and it is important because "belief" suggests faith. Its funny that you, a theist, thinks I have a self esteem problem. I don't need to invent an imaginary overseer to guide my insecure little mind. Oh, I also made my own lunch. Even from a very young age I was in control of my own destiny.
uknowispeaksense 4 months ago
@uknowispeaksense Atheism is by definition the belief that there is no God. The denial of God is a belief! I could be wrong about your self esteem, though its been my observation that most pseudo intellectuals who have to mock others to feel good about themselves, usually are compensating for low self esteem. You think I'm a theist? Oh how presumptuous you are, lol! So sad that you will never know the joys of objective thinking, lol!
DarthTroller 4 months ago
@DarthTroller " The mental act, condition, or habit of placing trust or confidence in another: My belief in you is as strong as ever.
Mental acceptance of and conviction in the truth, actuality, or validity of something: His explanation of what happened defies belief.
Something believed or accepted as true, especially a particular tenet or a body of tenets accepted by a group of persons. "
wowamonn 4 months ago
@DarthTroller No, I figured you for a troll before I noticed your moniker and I know figured you probably weren't a theist. You're nowhere near rampant enough and you type very succinctly. I don't consider myself a pseudo intellectual but just someone who is passionate about stamping out scientific illiteracy. I know the raving creationists are hard nuts to crack but I've got to start somewhere. Nice chatting with you. Take it easy.
uknowispeaksense 4 months ago
@DarthTroller How is it possible to have a belief in Atheisim?
wowamonn 4 months ago
@wowamonn Simple! It is the belief that there is no God. How is it possible that you did not already know that?
DarthTroller 4 months ago
@DarthTroller To deny the existance for a god is based on a lack of evidence for such beings. Therfore how ca it be a belief in the religous use of the term?
wowamonn 4 months ago
I wonder if they have shirts that say "now's your chance to dry hump a mormon." Or for Muslims: "Cop a feel (my husband's not looking)"
wickerspin1119 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that undirected natural laws can bring about an airplane or a living cell. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all its is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
Mogley52 4 months ago
Its not even funny how many facepalm moments are in this video.
Airsoftattack123 4 months ago
Only in America!
...and probably in Somalia...
and Saudi Arabia...
and Iran..
and Rwanda
and...
well, you know what I mean.
DonKacunko1 4 months ago
I hope it`s the only museum in the world!
paul262674 4 months ago
9:02 "All of the dinosaurs were vegetarians." That's right folks, those huge teeth and razor-sharp claws were for nibbling on leaves and berries.
ColdSteelandBlood 4 months ago
the atheists will prove that everything in the museum came from a soup.
ikawpipa 4 months ago
Comment removed
ikawpipa 4 months ago
There is no spoon :D
OctoberGrimm 4 months ago
Recovering Catholic....more like recovering crack head
Drebln893 4 months ago
@Drebln893
Well, if you ant to understand and agree with religion, it probably helps to be whacked out of your skull most of the time...
jerico641 4 months ago
@jerico641 ....Yeah, guess those that study courses in philosophy and religion are wackos huh!!!?... #bequietnoob
Drebln893 4 months ago
@Drebln893
Nope; attempting to understand religion in terms of world sociology and history, and/or studying it from an objective approach is fine, even interesting. It's when you start to believe in it that you might as well start hitting the pipe...bitemyass
jerico641 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jerico641 ...Whats worst is when you spend all your time getting angry and emotional about something you don't believe exists. Posting comments and trolling channels....LOL...#wackotrolls
Drebln893 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jerico641 ...Whats worst is when you spend all your time getting angry and emotional about something you don't believe exists. Posting comments and trolling channels LMAO #wackotrolls
Drebln893 4 months ago
2:22 ah yes,humans and dinosaurs.Remember that time in the bible,where jesus enters the city on top of a t-rex? and then he unleashed him on the pharisees,because they thought dinosaurs did not exist at that time,and then an apostle of jesus ,i think it was Tomas, said "HOLY SHIT.A dinosaur from the triassic period"
Samura1gamer 4 months ago
Recovering Catholic.... I love it. Good video.
brewerbrian420 4 months ago
we can prove nothing...discard your believes...
shadow479 4 months ago
Interesting and amusing
Xatasha6611 4 months ago
I agree with what the atheists are doing here, but what a piss poor representation - a bunch of pierced, tattooed, ill spoken degenerates. There are much better people to have doing this imo.
MrGrevy 4 months ago
Makes me sad for this country. We're so far behind in intellect it's just embarrassing. Seeing these brainwashed, sad people shuffle along and soak up this unscientific dreck is depressing.
MrGrevy 4 months ago
Accept Jesus into your life and you will believe lies!
TBlenx1995 4 months ago
No.... God does not regret His actions. He regrets mans poor choices.
rmaynard626 4 months ago
@rmaynard626 If God regrets man's poor choices, then it must logically follow that He regrets the design of man that enabled man to make such poor choices. Since He is the designer, He, Himself regrets his own creation... kind of a weak God eh?
Radetzky19 4 months ago
@Radetzky19 Would your parents regret having you as their child, based upon poor choices that you may have made? You don't disassociate from someone you truly love, based upon poor decision making. Stop thinking like a borg, and think it terms of HUMAN BEINGS in a loving parental relationship.
rmaynard626 4 months ago
@rmaynard626 You automatically assume that no parent regrets having children. It is a logical fallacy. Unfortunately there are some cases in which that occurs even though you may find it ideal that instances of that do not happen at all. It is also besides the point. I'm not acting like a borg, I'm using logic that you seem not to like but too bad that's reality.
Radetzky19 4 months ago
@Radetzky19 You are referring to multiple instances where that could be the case. I'm asking you (a singular instance) would your parents regret having you? As a parent, the answer is NO, because the love that you have for your child greatly outweighs anything that child could say or do. Its not that I don't recognize logic, I just don't see it in this instance.
rmaynard626 4 months ago
@rmaynard626 You are missing the point. Your analogy is fallacious because you are using that parent analogy to reflect your God's "love" or whatever you are trying to prove. It's not the same, esp when your God has attributes such as omnipotence and "omni-benevolence". If you say your God regrets the poor choices men make (another question arises what is considered "poor" cause there is no objective of morality), then he himself is also at fault..thats how logic works.
Radetzky19 4 months ago
@rmaynard626 I know you are trying to counter me saying that God regrets HOW He designed his own creation, is like saying my parents regret having me. This is not a proper analogy. First of all my parents can only fornicate me. Your god, however, "designs" each and every one of us so more of our capabilities are in "His control". You still automatically assume all parents are all loving of their children which is not the case.
Radetzky19 4 months ago
@rmaynard626 3) LOL you cannot ask me of a "singular instance" of my parents regretting for having me when you come up with an answer of NO due to ASSUMING that everyone's "thoughts of how they view their children as a parent" are the same as yours. FALLACY. You failed at asking the correct question. Anyway, parents are mortal human beings only capable of fornicating offspring and have no say in how the baby is predestined by your God. However, you God knowing the future and being
Radetzky19 4 months ago
@rmaynard626 4) all powerful ceases to change anything even though he knows the exact "poor choices" a certain human is going to make even though he is all powerful and supposedly all good. It does not make sense. With those characteristics attributed to such a being, it logically follows that he must regret how designs everyone in certain ways since he is the "grand designer" and can choose to not regret anything and make sure a being does not make those "poor choices".
Radetzky19 4 months ago
@Radetzky19 Again, you're trying to rationalize God's decision, which are based in love. Love does necessarily take a logical approach, because a major component to love is free will from both sides.
rmaynard626 4 months ago
@rmaynard626 Yes it is important to rationalize another person's actions. that's the way of the world. so why aren't you? You try to make it about love but I just proved the opposite. At this point, you writing only a few sentences after me breaking down to you the problem in 5 paragraphs is very menial and ignorant on your part. You have yet to give me something that you are trying to argue for.
Radetzky19 4 months ago
@rmaynard626 2) an omnipotent and all loving God would not regret a man's "poor decisions". 1) because He is all powerful he can easily never make Himself regret (esp since he is supposed to never make mistakes). 2) if he is all loving he would not dare jeopardize the possibility of a man making poor decisions, for it is a reflection on He as the creator as well as He being the "caretaker" of man. If your God regrets, then He made a mistake CASE CLOSED
Radetzky19 4 months ago
Stop even trying to argue with the creationists. It's like arguing with a dead dog. You're not going to change their minds. :P
Fablefiend 4 months ago
A commentary on an other video made me think about this, people leading this museum are merchants. They are merchants of religion. They're are the same kind of merchants that their own god, Jesus, kicked away from the temple.
Paradox ?
fwine19 4 months ago
What makes me sad is that creationnists have done it. They made talk about themselves, about their ideas, they built a pseudo-museum and have reached their goal : make money. Not even Christians come into this museum but also atheists and agnostics. And the more we'll talk about them, the more publicity they'll have and the more money they'll earn.
I vomit their "religion", for good.
fwine19 4 months ago
What the hell is that place!? It looks more like a "Flintstones" theme park than a museum!
benthejrporter 5 months ago
Personally I feel weird when people say they were X years religious. Like membership duration actually mattered. Quantity not quality. It is hard to stop myself from asking questions like. Did you talk to theologians before you made your decision? -Often not- and so, how "believing" were you, if you just slipped through the cracks without even addressing the questions past a theologian? I wonder how they lived their lives as "christians" often i ask. Where you involved in charity work+giving?
Bagsy84 5 months ago
Regret in genesis:
1 God was grieved, and some translations do use that word.
2 God was not grieved because of himself but because of humans.
3 someone can mention that their relative passed away and you say "I'm Sorry
".. Why are you sorry? Are you the one who killed that person?----- Exactly the point.
Bagsy84 5 months ago
"how do you know the bible is true" is like saying "how do you know your birth certificate is true". The issue of "True or False" Is not easily tossed on to a document. As if a typographical error on your birth certificate automatically proves everything else is false (or w/e).
Also, the bible is a library of multiple books. Does anyone actually go to a library and as " how do you know if this library is true". as you can see- it does not even work right if you ask it that way.
Bagsy84 5 months ago
Are all atheists spoiled college aged brats with an axe to grind?
jimthebaptist67 5 months ago
They have museums in America filled with this mess? So glad I live in England where nobody cares enough about stupid myths to even take it seriously.
boosie007666 5 months ago
@boosie007666 i live in america and ive never seen one untill now...
garbadgeman2012 5 months ago
Is there an animatronic human snorting coke off a dinosaur's ass?
Nilguiri 5 months ago
God said "I am that I am"? I thought popeye said that. lol
lhurien 5 months ago
the athiest are funny, the creationists won, their whole point is and always was, was to get their money lol.
marklvrd 5 months ago
When you have the childish explanation of "god did it" you don't need evidence or reality. And clearly, "god did it" is the ONLY explanation that the creation "museum" needs.
Blacksmith1964 5 months ago
u dont need to be that much intelligent to go inside that museum and get out laughing
cadonuno 5 months ago
anyone else notice that only religious groups use terms like 'opposition' to describe atheists?
optimisticjames 5 months ago
What an absolute monument to ignorance this museum is! I'm ashamed to live in this country because of this.
Lennon4ever1 5 months ago 6
@Lennon4ever1
Some of my wife's relatives from Kentucky are visiting us this week. They live relatively close to this place, and while they are pretty blue-collar individuals, they're not particularly religious. So far I haven't asked them about the place or if they've ever been there (they have daughters and grand kids), but I'm dying to.
jerico641 4 months ago
Respond to this video...
Paddle faster, I hear banjo music!
jerico641 4 months ago
Respond to this video...
Flintstones, meet the Flintstones...
jerico641 4 months ago