Stupid religious nuts. Slowing down scientific progress that could've save many lives. But no, it's so inhumane. I would like to point out their hypocrisy when they say doctors who do abortion must die. It's OK for a fully grown human to die but not an embryo that hasn't even grown a single organ yet?
a brainless sac filled with 12 cells is not a human! It is no more important than a plant! if u have ever burned urself or gotten hurt EVER!!!! U have killed many many cells wich according to crazy fundies are people? wtf?!
@fishontuesday it's human, but not a human being which is all that matters. i think republicans are against abortion because their brains have no more then 12 brain cells so they want to save anything with as many.
that'sthe same thing nazi researchers thought when they experimented with jews: we can save millions of people by using concentration camp jews for a good cause. they are going in the gas chamber anyways.
Are you seriously comparing living human beings to cells in tubes? Or did the Jews in your opinion also have to be fertilized with a sperm and implanted in a woman's womb to have a chance at life? This is either manipulation or sheer stupidity.
yes lacountess. i'm comparing them because embryo stem cells are taken from EMBRYOS -a fertilized egg that becomes a human being- who have to be implanted in a woman's womb (or in a test tube) to have the conditions food,water,warmth- to develop and PROSECUTE their life, the same way a lil baby needs those conditions (and someone that provides him with them) to grow up.
embryos who haven't had that chance because they were born in inhuman conditions in a lab that has no respect for their life, can perfectly be compared with the jews in the concentration camps, with the only difference that those jews had families and people who loved them, and who could defend them and claim for their rights.
Really? That's the ONLY difference those Jews have with the embryos? The fact that they had families and loved ones?
I'm speechless. Unless this is a joke or your only reference of Jews in concentration camps is a twisted WWII movie where the Nazis kept a bunch of single cell organisms with friends and families in captivity I am talking to a total idiot.
i mean they have no difference in their DIGNITY as human beings, with its consecuent right to live. the difference is that the jews have lived enough to have people who RESPECTS and CARES FOR THEIR LIFE, people who can pressure authorities, organisms, etc to make that right be respected. all human beings, no matter how grown-up or how many cells they have, have a dignity that everybody gots to respect, but in the case of the embryos nobody is caring for it.
A lot of people don't think of those embryos as human beings. That's were the heart of the argument lies, isn't it? If I thought of a single cell as more than just a cell that doesn't have consciousness and doesn't feel pain maybe I would have joined your camp. But to me a butterfly that fights for its survival and feels agony when killed deserves more attention than these cells.
u know what? in the 18th or 19th century many people (especially the powerful ones) didn't think of black people as human beings. maybe some of them were not sure if they were human or not, and they didn't care, but they preferred stating they were not so slavery was supported. other people really thought they were just animals, and cared more about butterflies than of slavery's abolition. it seems unlikely nowadays, but in the 16th century it was reality. do u think they behaviour was less
u know what? I just realized discussing this with you is hopeless. First you compare embryos to Jews in camps, now to black people. It seems to completely fly over your head that those examples, regardless of what was THOUGHT, were PEOPLE, with feelings, memories, ideas, families, friends, thoughts and speech, or at the very least a sense of pain, heat, cold, comfort, fatigue, and love. I've given up trying to underline these differences for you so I leave you to your world of crazy parallels.
Agreed. Stem Cells are the way of the future that will greatly improve the lives and health of millions of people around the world. All those that oppose it take their good health for granted, just imagine your view if you were paralysed and stem cells often the only hope for a normal life
Yeah because government mandates have been holding it down. There is technology called protein robotics, it's a nanotechnology that regenerates cells. Which means if you have cancer you could get injected with good cells and get rid of the cancer, in a brief description. but, the government won't let any further research. So, yes there COULD be cures from stem cells but religion and government. the dumb shits they are say it's inhumane.
@captainscorpo Religious people are retarded and that's why they are against it. Government wants retarded votes because they form majority and that's why they are against it. In meanwhile millions of people are still dying because of religion... Like in crusades, inquisitions and witchhunts... I thought this was 21st century.
wtf this speech is completely bullshit talks for thirty two seconds and he uses cheap crappy inspiring words that don't m mean any thing prolife community ? skin cell research? academic one? struggle wtf mcain you don't say anything about the struggles of stem cell research or skincell research what are your opinions ect ect this is the reason nobody should vote for mcain and and several other
wtf this speech is completely bullshit talks for thirty two seconds and he uses cheap crappy inspiring words that don't m mean any thing prolife community ? skin cell research? academic one? struggle wtf mcain you don't say anything about the struggles of stem cell research or skincell research what are your opinions ect ect this is the reason nobody should vote for mcain and and several other
The 9/11 play of destroying WTC was played by Bush and his allies for capturing the global fuel reserves as has been exposed by media a no of times. But unluckily he isnt able to get to these fuel reserves as easily as he thought. Rather the fuel prices have jumped up above $ 110 a barrel which was around $ 40 a barrel before this U.S barbarism. Having McCain succeed as president in the U.S election 2008 is a part of this barbarism which Bush wants to be continued destroying US economy totally.
religion in terms of what? morality? govt should take morality (particularly the morals of its constituents) into account when making laws. for example based on a particular moral code (which may be from a religion), some people believe its wrong to steal. should the govt remove that moral code when making laws about stealing? applied to stem cell, the question becomes whose morality wins? whose morality do we go with as americans? thats why this issue (or any issue really) is so controversial.
"your an idiot"? you mean YOU'RE an idiot. it helps to not make idiotic mistakes when you're calling someone else out. idiot.
i'm not saying lack of religion equals lack of morality. i'm saying MOST people derive their morality from the religion they ascribe to. in that sense, gov't should take religious beliefs into account.
also you cant use dead cells to make any organs. if the fetus is dead so are the cells. to use the cells you have to destroy the fetus, thats why people dont like it.
because it's not a typo. it's evidence that algea07 didn't know the difference between your and you're. which, if you're calling someone an idiot, casts doubt on the possibility you'd have anything intelligent to say in the rest of the comment. a typo is like when you left out the "l" in obviously. we know you don't think the word is spelled "obviousy" so that kind of error is no big deal. youtube is not really the forum to debate the rest of your comment, due partially to the character limit.
It also describes the scenario in which you think "I'll type you're" but you type your. It's happened to me sometimes and I definitely know the difference.
hmmm. seems your EXTREMELY PRO STEM CELLS in that new ad of yours sssenator, ? isn't this true.? quite a quandary on eh whyyy ah yoou may have swiched on such aayy HOT TOPIC?....??
Stupid religious nuts. Slowing down scientific progress that could've save many lives. But no, it's so inhumane. I would like to point out their hypocrisy when they say doctors who do abortion must die. It's OK for a fully grown human to die but not an embryo that hasn't even grown a single organ yet?
HORRORTV1 6 months ago
I wish I was american so I could go out and vote for obama i think he is making the states a better place to live.
sleepwalking73 9 months ago
a brainless sac filled with 12 cells is not a human! It is no more important than a plant! if u have ever burned urself or gotten hurt EVER!!!! U have killed many many cells wich according to crazy fundies are people? wtf?!
fishontuesday 1 year ago 3
@fishontuesday it's human, but not a human being which is all that matters. i think republicans are against abortion because their brains have no more then 12 brain cells so they want to save anything with as many.
FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 1 year ago
that'sthe same thing nazi researchers thought when they experimented with jews: we can save millions of people by using concentration camp jews for a good cause. they are going in the gas chamber anyways.
tducci 3 years ago
Are you seriously comparing living human beings to cells in tubes? Or did the Jews in your opinion also have to be fertilized with a sperm and implanted in a woman's womb to have a chance at life? This is either manipulation or sheer stupidity.
lacountess 3 years ago
yes lacountess. i'm comparing them because embryo stem cells are taken from EMBRYOS -a fertilized egg that becomes a human being- who have to be implanted in a woman's womb (or in a test tube) to have the conditions food,water,warmth- to develop and PROSECUTE their life, the same way a lil baby needs those conditions (and someone that provides him with them) to grow up.
tducci 3 years ago
embryos who haven't had that chance because they were born in inhuman conditions in a lab that has no respect for their life, can perfectly be compared with the jews in the concentration camps, with the only difference that those jews had families and people who loved them, and who could defend them and claim for their rights.
tducci 3 years ago
Really? That's the ONLY difference those Jews have with the embryos? The fact that they had families and loved ones?
I'm speechless. Unless this is a joke or your only reference of Jews in concentration camps is a twisted WWII movie where the Nazis kept a bunch of single cell organisms with friends and families in captivity I am talking to a total idiot.
lacountess 3 years ago
i mean they have no difference in their DIGNITY as human beings, with its consecuent right to live. the difference is that the jews have lived enough to have people who RESPECTS and CARES FOR THEIR LIFE, people who can pressure authorities, organisms, etc to make that right be respected. all human beings, no matter how grown-up or how many cells they have, have a dignity that everybody gots to respect, but in the case of the embryos nobody is caring for it.
tducci 3 years ago
A lot of people don't think of those embryos as human beings. That's were the heart of the argument lies, isn't it? If I thought of a single cell as more than just a cell that doesn't have consciousness and doesn't feel pain maybe I would have joined your camp. But to me a butterfly that fights for its survival and feels agony when killed deserves more attention than these cells.
lacountess 3 years ago
u know what? in the 18th or 19th century many people (especially the powerful ones) didn't think of black people as human beings. maybe some of them were not sure if they were human or not, and they didn't care, but they preferred stating they were not so slavery was supported. other people really thought they were just animals, and cared more about butterflies than of slavery's abolition. it seems unlikely nowadays, but in the 16th century it was reality. do u think they behaviour was less
tducci 3 years ago
reprehensible because they thought blacks weren't human, or because they didn't care, being comfortable in their position?
tducci 3 years ago
u know what? I just realized discussing this with you is hopeless. First you compare embryos to Jews in camps, now to black people. It seems to completely fly over your head that those examples, regardless of what was THOUGHT, were PEOPLE, with feelings, memories, ideas, families, friends, thoughts and speech, or at the very least a sense of pain, heat, cold, comfort, fatigue, and love. I've given up trying to underline these differences for you so I leave you to your world of crazy parallels.
lacountess 3 years ago
Agreed. Stem Cells are the way of the future that will greatly improve the lives and health of millions of people around the world. All those that oppose it take their good health for granted, just imagine your view if you were paralysed and stem cells often the only hope for a normal life
jpmahone 3 years ago
but i thought that the strides they are making or going to make with stem cells could be done with skin cells.
i know that sounds silly. but what is he talking about, "skin cell research"?
zakfmt 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
did you know that embryo stem cell research has given no help to any causes...it has not even done a single damn thing...
mohomadali 3 years ago
Yeah because government mandates have been holding it down. There is technology called protein robotics, it's a nanotechnology that regenerates cells. Which means if you have cancer you could get injected with good cells and get rid of the cancer, in a brief description. but, the government won't let any further research. So, yes there COULD be cures from stem cells but religion and government. the dumb shits they are say it's inhumane.
captainscorpo 3 years ago 3
@captainscorpo Religious people are retarded and that's why they are against it. Government wants retarded votes because they form majority and that's why they are against it. In meanwhile millions of people are still dying because of religion... Like in crusades, inquisitions and witchhunts... I thought this was 21st century.
MrWsad 10 months ago
im a nigger :)
pktrickz 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The religious right wing extremist cultists who believe that the earth is only 2,000 years old have hijacked the Republican party.
This is not the Republican party of Reagan, it seems to me something more of a religious cult whom do not believe in evolution and loath science"
- Nancy Reagan (Sept. 2008 Financial Times)
twistandcrawl 3 years ago 2
McPain is a moron about everything, including stem cells.
McPain is a clone of George Bush. Four more years? Hell no!
maphound 3 years ago
wtf this speech is completely bullshit talks for thirty two seconds and he uses cheap crappy inspiring words that don't m mean any thing prolife community ? skin cell research? academic one? struggle wtf mcain you don't say anything about the struggles of stem cell research or skincell research what are your opinions ect ect this is the reason nobody should vote for mcain and and several other
davidzysk 3 years ago
like the ecomonic problems which are all in our head.
shadowravenz 3 years ago
He said he came down on the side of stem cell research, moron.
kolchak33 3 years ago
wtf this speech is completely bullshit talks for thirty two seconds and he uses cheap crappy inspiring words that don't m mean any thing prolife community ? skin cell research? academic one? struggle wtf mcain you don't say anything about the struggles of stem cell research or skincell research what are your opinions ect ect this is the reason nobody should vote for mcain and and several other
davidzysk 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The 9/11 play of destroying WTC was played by Bush and his allies for capturing the global fuel reserves as has been exposed by media a no of times. But unluckily he isnt able to get to these fuel reserves as easily as he thought. Rather the fuel prices have jumped up above $ 110 a barrel which was around $ 40 a barrel before this U.S barbarism. Having McCain succeed as president in the U.S election 2008 is a part of this barbarism which Bush wants to be continued destroying US economy totally.
yahoovisitor 3 years ago
Religion should have no place in government policies!!!!!
Stem cell research is the most promising line of research since anti biotics.
McCain is a joke...he would be funny if he and his ideas weren't so frightening.
Obama 08
jadegreenall 3 years ago
religion in terms of what? morality? govt should take morality (particularly the morals of its constituents) into account when making laws. for example based on a particular moral code (which may be from a religion), some people believe its wrong to steal. should the govt remove that moral code when making laws about stealing? applied to stem cell, the question becomes whose morality wins? whose morality do we go with as americans? thats why this issue (or any issue really) is so controversial.
lhs04 3 years ago
your an idiot
a lack of religion doesn't mean a lack of morality,
if a fetus is dead and discarded why shouldn't it be used to help save lives
algea07 3 years ago
"your an idiot"? you mean YOU'RE an idiot. it helps to not make idiotic mistakes when you're calling someone else out. idiot.
i'm not saying lack of religion equals lack of morality. i'm saying MOST people derive their morality from the religion they ascribe to. in that sense, gov't should take religious beliefs into account.
also you cant use dead cells to make any organs. if the fetus is dead so are the cells. to use the cells you have to destroy the fetus, thats why people dont like it.
lhs04 3 years ago
Okay, just let the foetus get binned or something then, don't use the foetus for stem cell research.
And Religious views should have no place in Politics whatsoever, morality maybe, but not religion.
Btw, who cares if the guy you're replying to made a typo? You don't use capital letters so you're obviousy a RETARD OLOL (sarcasm btw).
Iarehascheeseburger 3 years ago
because it's not a typo. it's evidence that algea07 didn't know the difference between your and you're. which, if you're calling someone an idiot, casts doubt on the possibility you'd have anything intelligent to say in the rest of the comment. a typo is like when you left out the "l" in obviously. we know you don't think the word is spelled "obviousy" so that kind of error is no big deal. youtube is not really the forum to debate the rest of your comment, due partially to the character limit.
lhs04 3 years ago
It also describes the scenario in which you think "I'll type you're" but you type your. It's happened to me sometimes and I definitely know the difference.
I probably spelt definitely incorrectly though.
Iarehascheeseburger 3 years ago
hmmm. seems your EXTREMELY PRO STEM CELLS in that new ad of yours sssenator, ? isn't this true.? quite a quandary on eh whyyy ah yoou may have swiched on such aayy HOT TOPIC?....??
HerschelKrustofski 3 years ago