Added: 2 years ago
From: DimaAMG
Views: 27,359
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 4 wheel drive vs 2 wheel drive duh of course the merc is gonna be faster from a stop, try from 40 or sthg they would prob be equal.

  • @alaslawi cry !

  • @NimaSomeh awww lol cute

  • wow, an american muscle car, doing what it was built to do and getting beaten by a truck....AMG tuned or not the SUV should not have won, I feel sorry for the owner of the challenger

  • AWD makes a big difference doesn't it

  • your paying like an extra 50 000 dollars so u dont have to look at plastic and your seats are slightly more comfortable ahahahahahahahah

  • is Challenger , not Callager ;)

  • NOW IF IT WAS THE SRT CHEROKEE, THE MERCEDES WOULD OF BEEN LEFT IN THE DUST!

  • list of bad ass suvs!!! trailblazer ss 6.0 ls2 jeep srt8 6.1 hemi mercedes ml63 6.3 v8 porsche cayenne turbo bmw x6 vw toureg w12 bmw x5 4.8liter shelby durango 5.9 supercharged saleen explorer 5.0 supercharged if theres any im forgeting please speak up! if its bang for the buck you want the trailblazer ss is the clear winner.
  • @BLACKLACDTS the trailblazer is an absolute shit car compared to the rest you listed...

  • @TheDynoSoar what do you base that statement off of?

  • @BLACKLACDTS my knowledge of automobiles...

  • @TheDynoSoar please explain.

  • @BLACKLACDTS

    trailblazer ss - 6.0 liter v8

    about 385hp

    0-60 - 6 seconds

    trailblazer ss probably has the worst interior except for the shelby and ford explorer. most of it is just plastic and crappy leather seats.

    the best car that you listed would be IMO the ml63 amg or the porsche cayenne turbo. (the 2st generation cayenne because the most recent generation is just disgusting and reminds me of its ugly brother, the touareg.)

  • @TheDynoSoar lol i actually own a trailblazer ss all wheel drive 3lt with heated leather and suede seats,moonroof,dvd/navigation, digital ac/heat controls front and rear. rated at 395hp and stock 0-60 times of 5.6 sec with the awd. with a cold air intake,programer and mild converter my times are 4.8 0-60 and 13.40@101mph 1/4 mile time with a 1.8 60ft. .i agree its not as nice as the merc or porsche but for the price it cant be beat. and i will run door to door with any of them.

  • @BLACKLACDTS price-wise i would agree, but chevy still could have put more horses in it. like at least 425-450 hp i think.

  • @TheDynoSoar oh yea im not goin to dis agree with that one my friend! lol of course a 438hp vette sourced ls3 would of been nice! it runs good for what it is. im doin the headers,electric fans and a real tune and should be in the 12s @5200lbs. the best thing about the tbss is performance parts! thats where the ss shines compared to the other suvs.

  • Id hope the AMG would win considering its got 500 hp to the SRT8s 425. A better match would have been the Jeep SRT8 with 4WD.

  • It shut be a Brabus ME63 biturbo that's a real car :D

  • Challenger SRT8 ?? 6.4L V8 ?? Wouldn't it better be a 4.0 biturbo ?? Would be much more reasonable.

  • NO chance for the SRT

  • amg 4wd .. it will win by nature .. try with srt8 grandcherokee 4wd ...

  • Who ever said that the Challenger would catch up, doesn't know that top speeds, "Mercedes always wins." 

  • so fake the benz accelerates way aster then that

  • AMG POWER !!!!!!

    Best SUV EVER

  • mercedes is the best

  • american piece of shit

  • @aleksandarfriscic Take it easy my man. Im German from Berlin,I live in America and I drive a CHALLENGER R/T 2011. I get more compliments about the Challenger then my friend in a BMW or Benz. ;)

  • the ml63 is not awd. and it is the king of all suv's; now there something to talk about

  • hahahahahahahahahahaha.

    the fourbie killed the dodge

  • that just Callenger dream,,,,,,, that all ( that combination is never ever going to be work out)

  • People, the SUV is AWD so all the driver has to do is floor it from a dig and it will hook up. The Challenger has to leen into it. The driver did a good job not spinning the tires much. As you can see the Challenger was catching up...

  • the funny thing is that the challenger is even heavier than the 4x4...

    anyway, the challenger is automatic, so it loses. next time try to pass a manual!

  • I dont know where you're getting your facts, but the ml63 weighs almost 1000lbs heavier than the challenger, and with or without a manual the challenger will have its ass handed to it by the ml63. Get your facts straight.

  • the challenger weights about 2500kgand the mercedes 1900 to 2100, depending on model. i got the facts from my challenger and my friend's ml.

    and the acceleration gets about 3 seconds better with manual, and even more if you turn off the ESP and TCS.

  • Comment removed

  • I love ml 63 amg

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more